Pay vs Performance Disclosure
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
Dec. 31, 2020
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
Pay versus performance The following section has been prepared in accordance with the SEC’s pay versus performance (“PvP”) disclosure rule. The PvP rule requires public companies to disclose information reflecting the relationship between the company’s financial performance and a new definition of pay, referred to as “Compensation Actually Paid.” The Compensation Actually Paid amounts shown below do not reflect actual compensation paid to or earned by our NEOs, and Compensation Actually Paid was not used by the Compensation Committee to make any compensation decisions. The table below includes the required PvP disclosures for the Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and the average non-PEO NEO for fiscal years 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Detailed information on the calculation of the Compensation Actually Paid amounts for the applicable year can be found in footnote (2) below. 2023 | | | 15,924,194 | | | 21,050,577 | | | 5,576,098 | | | 6,457,863 | | | 199 | | | 216 | | | 1,406 | | | 3.54 | 2022 | | | 14,477,875 | | | 15,281,897 | | | 3,457,622 | | | 2,196,543 | | | 172 | | | 183 | | | 1,253 | | | 3.17 | 2021 | | | 13,770,306 | | | 26,766,637 | | | 3,956,450 | | | 7,555,268 | | | 188 | | | 193 | | | 1,246 | | | 3.01 | 2020 | | | 11,987,312 | | | 17,995,581 | | | 4,508,897 | | | 5,098,198 | | | 144 | | | 160 | | | 906 | | | 2.52 |
(1)
| The PEO for each year shown in this table is Ms. Marks. |
(2)
| The year-over-year variation in the amounts reported is highly correlated with changes in our stock price. In 2023, Otis hired Ms. Embree and Mr. Miñarro Viseras. They contributed to the higher “Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs” amount reported for 2023 due to their sign-on awards. In contrast, in 2022, our former CFO left employment and forfeited certain equity awards granted to him. His departure contributed to the lower “Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs” amount reported for 2022.The following tables set forth the adjustments made from the Summary Compensation Table total for the PEO and the Average Summary Compensation Table total for the non-PEO NEOs to determine the Compensation Actually Paid to the PEO and Average Compensation Actually Paid to the non-PEO NEOs under the rule. |
Deduction for amounts reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table | | | -11,672,600 | Increase based on fair value of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end, determined as of year-end(8) | | | 12,222,301 | Increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end(8) | | | 2,971,889 | Increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year(8) | | | 1,072,146 | Increase based on dividends or other earnings paid during year prior to vesting date of award | | | 532,647 | Total Adjustments | | | 5,126,383 |
Average deduction for change in actuarial present values reported under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column in the Summary Compensation Table(7) | | | -890 | Average increase for service cost of pension plans(7) | | | 2,250 | Average deduction for amounts reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table | | | -3,881,172 | Average increase based on fair value of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end, determined as of year-end(8) | | | 4,400,944 | Average increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end(8) | | | 192,372 | Average increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year(8) | | | 105,847 | Average deduction of fair value of awards granted prior to year that were forfeited during year(8) | | | – | Average increase based on dividends or other earnings paid during year prior to vesting date of award | | | 62,414 | Total Adjustments | | | 881,765 |
(3)
| The names of the non-PEO NEOs in each fiscal year are listed in the table below. |
A. Maheshwari | | | A. Maheshwari | | | R. Ghai | | | R. Ghai | P. Zheng | | | R. Ghai | | | P. Zheng | | | P. Zheng | T. Embree | | | P. Zheng | | | N. LaFreniere | | | N. LaFreniere | E. Miñarro Viseras | | | N. LaFreniere | | | S. de Montlivault | | | S. de Montlivault | | | | S. de Montlivault | | | | | | M. Eubanks |
(4)
| Otis became an independent publicly traded company on April 3, 2020. The TSR calculations for Otis and the Peer Group are based on a fixed $100 investment from April 3, 2020, through the end of 2023, assuming reinvestment of dividends until the last day of each reporting fiscal year. The Peer Group, for purpose of this table, is the S&P 500 Industrials Sector Index. |
(5)
| This represents Otis’ net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. |
(6)
| The Compensation Committee has made the assessment that adjusted earnings per share (“adjusted EPS”), which is calculated on a diluted basis, represents the most important financial measure used by Otis to link Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs for 2023 to our performance. Adjusted EPS is the performance measure that has the greatest weighting under our PSUs. We grant 50% of each NEO’s LTI opportunity as PSUs. See Appendix A on pages 98-101 for information on how adjusted EPS is calculated from our audited financial statements. |
(7)
| Ms. LaFreniere is a participant in the PPP, and Messrs. de Montlivault and Miñarro Viseras participate in the TCN Plan and the Spanish Defined Benefit – Policy 7179, respectively. None of our other NEOs participate in an Otis-sponsored pension plan. |
(8)
| For awards granted prior to 2020, we measure the increase or decrease in fair value from April 3, 2020, the date we became an independent publicly traded company. A binomial lattice model was used to estimate the fair value of the SARs. Fair values for our PSUs, which are partly market-based awards because of the TSR multiplier, are based on a Monte Carlo valuation if the PSU TSR measurement period has not ended (i.e., for the 2022 PSUs and 2023 PSUs). Both models are consistent with the grant-date valuation models used for valuations under FASB ASC 718. Below is a description of the assumptions made for the valuations of the SARs and 2022 and 2023 PSUs. |
PSUs | | | | Range of Weighted Financial Metric Multipliers | | | 90 – 100% | TSR Realized Performance (percentile) | | | 45th – 51st | Historical Volatility | | | 19% – 23% | Risk-Free Interest Rate | | | 4.13% – 4.67% |
SARs | | | | Expected Term (years) | | | 2.3 – 5.2 | Exercise Price | | | $51.81 – $85.23 | Blended Volatility | | | 26% – 30% | Dividend Yield | | | 1.4% – 1.6% | Risk-Free Interest Rate | | | 3.6% – 4.7% |
Expected term estimates for measurements in the current fiscal year were calculated by taking the difference between (i) the expected term as of the grant date of the SARs and (ii) the time since grant. This difference was then divided by the stock-to-exercise price ratio as of the applicable measurement date, therefore, shortening the term for the SARs since all the SARs are in-the-money at the applicable measurement date. The Blended Volatility is calculated as an average of the peer and historical volatility on the measurement date. Historical Volatility is calculated from daily Otis stock prices, term matched for the expected term (consistent with the approach used for the grant-date valuation of options). Peer volatility is calculated based on the average of the volatility of the peer group within the industry. Dividend Yield is calculated as the quarterly dividend amount divided by the three-month average stock price on the valuation date, annualized and continuously compounded. Risk-free interest rate is the continuously compounded, term-matching, zero-coupon rate from applicable measurement date. Estimated fair values of the unvested PSU awards which vest based upon financial performance metrics and a relative TSR modifier, were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation as of December 31, 2023: 2023 PSU | | | $91.00 | | | 101.71% | 2022 PSU | | | $89.15 | | | 99.64% |
As the TSR performance period for the 2021 PSUs was completed as of December 31, 2023, no TSR modifier was calculated for the relevant 2023 valuations. To calculate total PSU fair value as of each measurement date for each NEO, the TSR modifier fair value shown in the table above was multiplied by (i) the corresponding expected payout from the performance goals described on pages 54-57 and (ii) the number of target performance units unvested and outstanding plus dividend equivalent units accrued at the time. (a)
| Target shares are defined as a payout of 100%, such that the maximum payout is 120% given the TSR multiplier. |
|
|
|
|
Company Selected Measure Name |
adjusted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
(1)
| The PEO for each year shown in this table is Ms. Marks. |
(3)
| The names of the non-PEO NEOs in each fiscal year are listed in the table below. |
A. Maheshwari | | | A. Maheshwari | | | R. Ghai | | | R. Ghai | P. Zheng | | | R. Ghai | | | P. Zheng | | | P. Zheng | T. Embree | | | P. Zheng | | | N. LaFreniere | | | N. LaFreniere | E. Miñarro Viseras | | | N. LaFreniere | | | S. de Montlivault | | | S. de Montlivault | | | | S. de Montlivault | | | | | | M. Eubanks |
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote |
(4)
| Otis became an independent publicly traded company on April 3, 2020. The TSR calculations for Otis and the Peer Group are based on a fixed $100 investment from April 3, 2020, through the end of 2023, assuming reinvestment of dividends until the last day of each reporting fiscal year. The Peer Group, for purpose of this table, is the S&P 500 Industrials Sector Index. |
|
|
|
|
PEO Total Compensation Amount |
$ 15,924,194
|
$ 14,477,875
|
$ 13,770,306
|
$ 11,987,312
|
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
$ 21,050,577
|
15,281,897
|
26,766,637
|
17,995,581
|
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
(2)
| The year-over-year variation in the amounts reported is highly correlated with changes in our stock price. In 2023, Otis hired Ms. Embree and Mr. Miñarro Viseras. They contributed to the higher “Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs” amount reported for 2023 due to their sign-on awards. In contrast, in 2022, our former CFO left employment and forfeited certain equity awards granted to him. His departure contributed to the lower “Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs” amount reported for 2022.The following tables set forth the adjustments made from the Summary Compensation Table total for the PEO and the Average Summary Compensation Table total for the non-PEO NEOs to determine the Compensation Actually Paid to the PEO and Average Compensation Actually Paid to the non-PEO NEOs under the rule. |
Deduction for amounts reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table | | | -11,672,600 | Increase based on fair value of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end, determined as of year-end(8) | | | 12,222,301 | Increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end(8) | | | 2,971,889 | Increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year(8) | | | 1,072,146 | Increase based on dividends or other earnings paid during year prior to vesting date of award | | | 532,647 | Total Adjustments | | | 5,126,383 |
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
$ 5,576,098
|
3,457,622
|
3,956,450
|
4,508,897
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
$ 6,457,863
|
2,196,543
|
7,555,268
|
5,098,198
|
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
(2)
| The year-over-year variation in the amounts reported is highly correlated with changes in our stock price. In 2023, Otis hired Ms. Embree and Mr. Miñarro Viseras. They contributed to the higher “Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs” amount reported for 2023 due to their sign-on awards. In contrast, in 2022, our former CFO left employment and forfeited certain equity awards granted to him. His departure contributed to the lower “Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs” amount reported for 2022.The following tables set forth the adjustments made from the Summary Compensation Table total for the PEO and the Average Summary Compensation Table total for the non-PEO NEOs to determine the Compensation Actually Paid to the PEO and Average Compensation Actually Paid to the non-PEO NEOs under the rule. |
Average deduction for change in actuarial present values reported under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column in the Summary Compensation Table(7) | | | -890 | Average increase for service cost of pension plans(7) | | | 2,250 | Average deduction for amounts reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table | | | -3,881,172 | Average increase based on fair value of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end, determined as of year-end(8) | | | 4,400,944 | Average increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end(8) | | | 192,372 | Average increase/deduction for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year(8) | | | 105,847 | Average deduction of fair value of awards granted prior to year that were forfeited during year(8) | | | – | Average increase based on dividends or other earnings paid during year prior to vesting date of award | | | 62,414 | Total Adjustments | | | 881,765 |
|
|
|
|
Equity Valuation Assumption Difference, Footnote |
(8)
| For awards granted prior to 2020, we measure the increase or decrease in fair value from April 3, 2020, the date we became an independent publicly traded company. A binomial lattice model was used to estimate the fair value of the SARs. Fair values for our PSUs, which are partly market-based awards because of the TSR multiplier, are based on a Monte Carlo valuation if the PSU TSR measurement period has not ended (i.e., for the 2022 PSUs and 2023 PSUs). Both models are consistent with the grant-date valuation models used for valuations under FASB ASC 718. Below is a description of the assumptions made for the valuations of the SARs and 2022 and 2023 PSUs. |
PSUs | | | | Range of Weighted Financial Metric Multipliers | | | 90 – 100% | TSR Realized Performance (percentile) | | | 45th – 51st | Historical Volatility | | | 19% – 23% | Risk-Free Interest Rate | | | 4.13% – 4.67% |
SARs | | | | Expected Term (years) | | | 2.3 – 5.2 | Exercise Price | | | $51.81 – $85.23 | Blended Volatility | | | 26% – 30% | Dividend Yield | | | 1.4% – 1.6% | Risk-Free Interest Rate | | | 3.6% – 4.7% |
Expected term estimates for measurements in the current fiscal year were calculated by taking the difference between (i) the expected term as of the grant date of the SARs and (ii) the time since grant. This difference was then divided by the stock-to-exercise price ratio as of the applicable measurement date, therefore, shortening the term for the SARs since all the SARs are in-the-money at the applicable measurement date. The Blended Volatility is calculated as an average of the peer and historical volatility on the measurement date. Historical Volatility is calculated from daily Otis stock prices, term matched for the expected term (consistent with the approach used for the grant-date valuation of options). Peer volatility is calculated based on the average of the volatility of the peer group within the industry. Dividend Yield is calculated as the quarterly dividend amount divided by the three-month average stock price on the valuation date, annualized and continuously compounded. Risk-free interest rate is the continuously compounded, term-matching, zero-coupon rate from applicable measurement date. Estimated fair values of the unvested PSU awards which vest based upon financial performance metrics and a relative TSR modifier, were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation as of December 31, 2023: 2023 PSU | | | $91.00 | | | 101.71% | 2022 PSU | | | $89.15 | | | 99.64% |
As the TSR performance period for the 2021 PSUs was completed as of December 31, 2023, no TSR modifier was calculated for the relevant 2023 valuations. To calculate total PSU fair value as of each measurement date for each NEO, the TSR modifier fair value shown in the table above was multiplied by (i) the corresponding expected payout from the performance goals described on pages 54-57 and (ii) the number of target performance units unvested and outstanding plus dividend equivalent units accrued at the time. (a)
| Target shares are defined as a payout of 100%, such that the maximum payout is 120% given the TSR multiplier. |
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
Pay versus performance relationships The graphs below illustrate the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid and • | Cumulative TSR for Otis and the Peer Group |

|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income |
Pay versus performance relationships The graphs below illustrate the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid and 
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure |
Pay versus performance relationships The graphs below illustrate the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid and 
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group |
Pay versus performance relationships The graphs below illustrate the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid and • | Cumulative TSR for Otis and the Peer Group |

|
|
|
|
Tabular List, Table |
Most important financial performance measures In our assessment, the most important financial performance measures used to link Compensation Actually Paid to our NEOs in 2023 to our performance are those used in our 2023 STI and LTI programs: • Adjusted EPS(1)
• Adjusted net income(1)
• Free cash flow(1) | | | • Organic sales growth(1)
• New Equipment orders growth(1)
• Relative TSR |
For more information on these measures, see the “STI compensation” section on pages 50- 53 and “LTI compensation” section on pages 54- 58. (1)
| Refer to Appendix A on pages 98-101 and Appendix B on page 102 for information on what is included in these definitions. Appendix A also provides a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures. The definitions of non-GAAP measures in Appendix A may differ from the definitions of measures used for the STI program in Appendix B. |
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Amount |
$ 199
|
172
|
188
|
144
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
216
|
183
|
193
|
160
|
Net Income (Loss) |
$ 1,406,000,000
|
$ 1,253,000,000
|
$ 1,246,000,000
|
$ 906,000,000
|
Company Selected Measure Amount | $ / shares |
3.54
|
3.17
|
3.01
|
2.52
|
PEO Name |
Ms. Marks
|
Ms. Marks
|
Ms. Marks
|
Ms. Marks
|
Percentage of Each NEO’s LTI Opportunity Granted as PSUs |
50.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Weighted Financial Metric Multipliers, Minimum for Performance Share Units |
90.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Weighted Financial Metric Multipliers, Maximum for Performance Share Units |
100.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Total Shareholder Return Realized Performance (Percentile), Minimum for Performance Share Units |
45
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Total Shareholder Return Realized Performance (Percentile), Maximum for Performance Share Units |
51
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Historical Volatility Rate, Minimum for Performance Share Units |
19.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Historical Volatility Rate, Maximum for Performance Share Units |
23.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate, Minimum for Performance Share Units |
4.13%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate, Maximum for Performance Share Units |
4.67%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term, Minimum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
2 years 3 months 18 days
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term, Maximum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
5 years 2 months 12 days
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Exercise Price, Minimum for Stock Appreciation Rights | $ / shares |
$ 51.81
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Exercise Price, Maximum for Stock Appreciation Rights | $ / shares |
$ 85.23
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Blended Volatility Rate, Minimum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
26.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Blended Volatility Rate, Maximum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
30.00%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Dividend Yield, Minimum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
1.40%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Dividend Yield, Maximum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
1.60%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate, Minimum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
3.60%
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement by Share-Based Payment Award, Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate, Maximum for Stock Appreciation Rights |
4.70%
|
|
|
|
Target Shares Payout Percentage |
100.00%
|
|
|
|
Target Shares Maximum Payout Percentage |
120.00%
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Name |
Adjusted EPS
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measure Description |
(6)
| The Compensation Committee has made the assessment that adjusted earnings per share (“adjusted EPS”), which is calculated on a diluted basis, represents the most important financial measure used by Otis to link Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs for 2023 to our performance. Adjusted EPS is the performance measure that has the greatest weighting under our PSUs. We grant 50% of each NEO’s LTI opportunity as PSUs. See Appendix A on pages 98-101 for information on how adjusted EPS is calculated from our audited financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Name |
Adjusted net income
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 3 |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Name |
Free cash flow
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 4 |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Name |
Organic sales growth
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 5 |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Name |
New Equipment orders growth
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 6 |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Name |
Relative TSR
|
|
|
|
Two Thousand Twenty Three Performance Share Units [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Returns Modifier Fair Value (Per Target Shares) | $ / shares |
$ 91
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Modifier Fair Value Factor (as Percentage of Valuation Date Stock Price) |
101.71%
|
|
|
|
Two Thousand Twenty Two Performance Share Units [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Returns Modifier Fair Value (Per Target Shares) | $ / shares |
$ 89.15
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Modifier Fair Value Factor (as Percentage of Valuation Date Stock Price) |
99.64%
|
|
|
|
PEO |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 5,126,383
|
|
|
|
PEO | Amounts Reported Under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(11,672,600)
|
|
|
|
PEO | Fair Value of Awards Granted During Year that Remain Unvested as of Year-End, Determined as of Year-End [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
12,222,301
|
|
|
|
PEO | Change in Fair Value from Prior Year-End to Current Year-End of Awards Granted Prior to Year that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Year-End [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
2,971,889
|
|
|
|
PEO | Change in Fair Value from Prior Year-End to Vesting Date of Awards Granted Prior to Year that Vested During Year [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
1,072,146
|
|
|
|
PEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid During Year Prior to Vesting Date of Award [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
532,647
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
881,765
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Amounts Reported Under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(3,881,172)
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Value of Awards Granted During Year that Remain Unvested as of Year-End, Determined as of Year-End [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
4,400,944
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value from Prior Year-End to Current Year-End of Awards Granted Prior to Year that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Year-End [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
192,372
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value from Prior Year-End to Vesting Date of Awards Granted Prior to Year that Vested During Year [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
105,847
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid During Year Prior to Vesting Date of Award [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
62,414
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Actuarial Present Values Reported Under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” Column in the Summary Compensation Table [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(890)
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Service Cost of Pension Plans [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
2,250
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Value of Awards Granted Prior to Year that were Forfeited During Year [Member] |
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 0
|
|
|
|