AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 10-Q filed on 8/9/2018
Quarterly Report
v3.10.0.1
Document And Entity Information - shares
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jul. 31, 2018
Entity Information [Line Items]    
Entity Registrant Name Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  
Trading Symbol AMRX  
Entity Central Index Key 0001723128  
Current Fiscal Year End Date --12-31  
Entity Filer Category Non-accelerated Filer  
Document Type 10-Q  
Document Period End Date Jun. 30, 2018  
Document Fiscal Year Focus 2018  
Document Fiscal Period Focus Q2  
Amendment Flag false  
Common Class A    
Entity Information [Line Items]    
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding   114,878,213
Common Class B    
Entity Information [Line Items]    
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding   171,260,707
Common Class B-1    
Entity Information [Line Items]    
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding   12,328,767
v3.10.0.1
Consolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($)
shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Income Statement [Abstract]        
Net revenue $ 413,787 $ 259,871 $ 688,976 $ 485,552
Cost of goods sold 235,492 136,138 366,086 245,803
Gross profit 178,295 123,733 322,890 239,749
Selling, general and administrative 53,003 26,938 78,124 54,640
Research and development 50,335 47,184 94,544 86,603
Intellectual property legal development expenses 4,047 4,926 8,623 11,093
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses 207,507 82 214,642 82
Restructuring expenses 44,465 0 44,465 0
Operating (loss) income (181,062) 44,603 (117,508) 87,331
Foreign exchange (loss) gain        
Interest expense, net (36,622) (17,726) (57,673) (31,887)
Foreign exchange (loss) gain (25,946) 15,332 (17,381) 29,929
Loss on extinguishment of debt (19,667) (2,531) (19,667) (2,531)
Other income (expense) 791 (78) 1,739 22
Total other expense, net (81,444) (5,003) (92,982) (4,467)
(Loss) income before income taxes (262,506) 39,600 (210,490) 82,864
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes (12,416) 1,852 (12,052) 2,855
Net (loss) income (250,090) 37,748 (198,438) 80,009
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC pre-Combination 200,341 (37,446) 148,806 (79,299)
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests 31,885 (302) 31,768 (710)
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. before accretion of redeemable non-controlling interest (17,864) 0 (17,864) 0
Accretion of redeemable non-controlling interest (1,240) 0 (1,240) 0
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $ (19,104) $ 0 $ (19,104) $ 0
Net loss per share attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s common stockholders:        
Basic and diluted (in dollars per share) $ (0.15)   $ (0.15)  
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:        
Basic and diluted (in shares) 127,112 0 127,112 0
v3.10.0.1
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Statement of Other Comprehensive Income [Abstract]        
Net (loss) income $ (250,090) $ 37,748 $ (198,438) $ 80,009
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC pre-Combination (200,341) 37,446 (148,806) 79,299
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests (31,885) 302 (31,768) 710
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. before accretion of redeemable non-controlling interest (17,864) 0 (17,864) 0
Accretion of redeemable non-controlling interest (1,240) 0 (1,240) 0
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (19,104) 0 (19,104) 0
Other comprehensive income (loss):        
Foreign currency translation adjustment 8,932 (11,749) (1,025) (10,944)
Less: Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC pre-Combination (11,678) 11,749 (1,721) 10,944
Less: Other comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests 1,576 0 1,576 0
Other comprehensive loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1,170) 0 (1,170) 0
Comprehensive loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $ (20,274) $ 0 $ (20,274) $ 0
v3.10.0.1
Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Current assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents $ 61,521 $ 74,166
Restricted cash 7,069 3,756
Trade accounts receivable, net 626,491 351,367
Inventories 512,479 284,038
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 139,596 42,396
Related party receivables 738 16,210
Total current assets 1,347,894 771,933
Property, plant and equipment, net 569,328 486,758
Goodwill 386,475 26,444
Intangible assets, net 1,788,533 44,599
Deferred tax asset, net 373,705 898
Other assets 78,653 11,257
Total assets 4,544,588 1,341,889
Current liabilities:    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 555,634 194,779
Note payable-related party 77,549 0
Current portion of financing obligations 251 311
Revolving credit facility 0 75,000
Current portion of long-term debt, net 21,427 14,171
Related-party payables 14,875 12,622
Total current liabilities 669,736 296,883
Long-term debt, net 2,641,305 1,355,274
Long-term portion of financing obligations 39,220 39,987
Deferred income taxes 2,491 2,491
Liabilities under tax receivable agreement 194,825 0
Other long-term liabilities 45,667 7,793
Related-party payable- long term 0 15,043
Total long-term liabilities 2,923,508 1,420,588
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 & 17)
Redeemable non-controlling interest 11,858 0
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 & 17)    
Members' equity, 189,000 units authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017   2,716
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding at June 30, 2018 0  
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000 shares authorized; 171,261 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2018 517,122 8,562
Stockholders' / Members' accumulated deficit (19,104) (382,785)
Additional paid-in capital (6,502) (14,232)
Members' Equity   (385,739)
Members' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest   10,157
Limited Liability Company (LLC) Members' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest   (375,582)
Total Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. stockholders' 494,501  
Stockholders' accumulated other comprehensive loss 444,985  
Total stockholders' 939,486  
Non-controlling interests 4,544,588 $ 1,341,889
Common Class A    
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 & 17)    
Common stock 1,149  
Common Class B    
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 & 17)    
Common stock 1,713  
Common Class B-1    
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 5 & 17)    
Common stock $ 123  
v3.10.0.1
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical)
Jun. 30, 2018
$ / shares
shares
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in shares) 2,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in shares) 0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in shares 0
Common Class A  
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares) 900,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares) 114,859,000
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares) 114,859,000
Common Class B  
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares) 300,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares) 171,261,000
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares) 171,261,000
Common Class B-1  
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares) 18,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares) 12,329,000
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares) 12,329,000
v3.10.0.1
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' / Members’ Deficit - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Total
Members' Equity
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Common Class A
Common Stock
Common Class B
Common Stock
Common Class B-1
Additional Paid-in Capital
Stockholders' Accumulated Deficit
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Non-Controlling Interests
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]                    
Cumulative-effective adjustment from adoption of ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606) $ 4,977             $ 4,977    
Members' equity beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2017 (375,582) $ 2,716         $ 8,562 (382,785) $ (14,232) $ 10,157
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]                    
Net (loss) income (198,438)                  
Foreign currency translation adjustment $ (1,025)                  
Exercise of stock options (in shares) 163,857                  
Stockholders' equity ending balance at Jun. 30, 2018 $ 939,486   $ 0 $ 1,149 $ 1,713 $ 123   (19,104) $ (6,502) $ 444,985
Shares ending balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2018     0 114,859,000 171,260,707 12,328,767 517,122,000      
Members' equity ending balance at Jun. 30, 2018   $ 0           $ 0    
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2017 0                  
Ending balance at Jun. 30, 2018 $ 11,858                  
v3.10.0.1
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities [Abstract]    
Net (loss) income $ (198,438) $ 80,009
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities [Abstract]    
Depreciation and amortization 46,897 21,136
Unrealized foreign currency loss (gain) 17,032 (33,089)
Amortization of debt issuance costs 2,577 2,463
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt 19,667 2,531
Gain termination of lease (3,524) 0
Deferred tax provision (14,993) 244
Inventory provision 17,426 2,047
Allowance for doubtful accounts provision (7) 124
Stock-based compensation and PPU expense 160,401 0
Other 934 0
Changes in assets and liabilities:    
Trade accounts receivable, net (60,051) 28,065
Inventories (71,655) (10,890)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 711 (5,955)
Related-party receivables 11,017 3,583
Other assets (5,818) (320)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 15,299 (3,811)
Other liabilities 4,331 (1,791)
Related-party payables (13,356) 11,063
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (71,550) 95,409
Investing activities:    
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (36,600) (54,612)
Acquisition of product rights and licenses (3,000) 0
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (321,324) 0
Net cash used in investing activities (360,924) (54,612)
Financing activities:    
Payments of deferred financing costs and debt extinguishment costs (54,955) (4,889)
Proceeds from issuance of debt 1,325,383 250,000
Payments on capital leases (8) (45)
Payments on financing obligations (121) (130)
Payments borrowings on revolving credit line (75,000)  
Proceeds borrowings on revolving credit line   25,000
Payments on debt (603,543) (6,448)
Exercise of stock options 1,977 0
Equity contributions 27,742 40
Capital contribution from non-controlling interest 360 0
Distributions to members (182,998) (295,265)
Repayment of related party note (14,842) 0
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 423,995 (31,737)
Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash (853) 5,238
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash (9,332) 14,298
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash - beginning of period 77,922 37,546
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash - end of period 68,590 51,844
Cash and cash equivalents 61,521 48,217
Restricted cash - end of period 7,069 3,627
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:    
Cash paid for interest 50,391 30,291
Income taxes paid 0 0
Noncash Investing and Financing Items [Abstract]    
Acquisition of product rights and licenses 10,000 19,500
Distribution to members $ 8,562 $ 0
v3.10.0.1
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly known as Atlas Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), was formed along with its wholly owned subsidiary, K2 Merger Sub Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), on October 4, 2017, for the purpose of facilitating the combination of Impax Laboratories, Inc. (now Impax Laboratories, LLC), a Delaware corporation then listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Impax") and Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Amneal").

Amneal was formed during 2002 and operates through various subsidiaries. Amneal is a vertically-integrated developer, manufacturer, and seller of generic pharmaceutical products. Amneal’s pharmaceutical research includes analytical and formulation development and stability. Amneal has operations in the United States, Switzerland, India, Ireland and the United Kingdom, and certain other countries, primarily in Western Europe. Amneal sells to wholesalers, distributors, hospitals, chain pharmacies and individual pharmacies, either directly or indirectly.

On October 17, 2017, Amneal and Impax entered into the Business Combination Agreement dated October 17, 2017, as amended on November 21, 2017 and December 16, 2017 (the "BCA") with the Company, Merger Sub, and Amneal.

On May 4, 2018 (the "Closing"), pursuant to the BCA, Impax and Amneal combined the generics and specialty pharmaceutical business of Impax with the generic drug development and manufacturing business of Amneal to create the Company as a new generics company, through the following transactions (together the "Combination"): (i) Merger Sub merged with and into Impax, with Impax surviving as a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of New Amneal, (ii) each share of Impax’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Impax Common Stock"), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Impax merger, other than Impax Common Stock held by Impax in treasury, by the Company or by any of their respective subsidiaries, was converted into the right to receive one fully paid and non-assessable share of Class A common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share ("Class A Common Stock"), (iii) Impax converted to a Delaware limited liability company, (iv) the Company contributed to Amneal all of the Company’s equity interests in Impax, in exchange for Amneal common units ("Amneal Common Units"), (v) the Company issued an aggregate number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share ("Class B Common Stock," and collectively, with the Class A Common Stock and Class B-1 common stock of the Company, par value $0.01, ("Class B-1 Common Stock"), the "Company Common Stock" to APHC Holdings, LLC, (formerly Amneal Holdings, LLC), the parent entity of Amneal ("Holdings"), and (vi) the Company became the managing member of Amneal.

Immediately upon the Closing of the Combination, holders of Impax Common Stock prior to the Closing collectively held approximately 25% of the Company and Holdings held a majority interest in the Company with an effective voting interest of approximately 75% on a fully diluted and as converted basis through their ownership of Class B Common Stock. Holdings also held a corresponding number of Amneal Common Units, which entitled it to approximately 75% of the economic interests in the combined businesses of Impax and Amneal. The Company owned an interest in Amneal of approximately 25% and is its managing member.

In connection with the Combination on May 4, 2018, Holdings entered into definitive purchase agreements which provided for a private placement of certain shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B-1 Common Stock (the "PIPE Investment") with select institutional investors (the "PIPE Investors"). Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreements, upon the Closing, Holdings exercised its right to cause the Company to redeem approximately 15% of its ownership interests in the Company in exchange for 34.5 million shares of Class A Common Stock and 12.3 million unregistered shares of Class B-1 Common Stock (the "Redemption"). The shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B-1 Common Stock received in the Redemption were sold immediately following the Closing by Holdings to the PIPE Investors at a per share purchase price of $18.25 for gross proceeds of $855.0 million. Following the PIPE Investment, the PIPE Investors owned collectively approximately 15% of the Company Common Stock on a fully diluted and as converted basis. On May 4, 2018, Holdings also caused Amneal to redeem (the "Closing Date Redemption") 6.9 million of Amneal Common Units held by Holdings for a like number of shares of Class A Common Stock, for future distribution to certain direct and indirect members of Holdings who were or are employees of the Company and to whom were previously issued (prior to the Closing) profit participation units ("PPUs") in Amneal. As a result of the PIPE Investment and Closing Date Redemption, the voting and economic interest of approximately 75% held by Holdings immediately upon Closing, was reduced by approximately 18%. As such, the overall interest percentage held by non-controlling interest holders upon the consummation of the Combination, PIPE Investment and Closing Date Redemption was approximately 57%. The Company is a holding company with its principal assets consisting of Amneal Common Units.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Amneal’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 included in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2018. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. ("U.S. GAAP") have been omitted from the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of its financial position as of June 30, 2018, and its results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and changes in stockholders'/ members’ deficit and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017 was derived from audited annual financial statements but does not contain all of the footnote disclosures from the annual financial statements.
v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

Although the Company has a minority economic interest in Amneal, it is Amneal’s sole managing member, having the sole voting power to make all of Amneal’s business decisions and control its management. Therefore, the Company consolidates the financial statements of Amneal and its subsidiaries. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are a continuation of Amneal’s financial statements, with adjustments to equity to reflect the Combination, the PIPE and non-controlling interests for the portion of Amneal’s economic interests that is not held by the Company. Prior to the closing of the Combination and PIPE, the Company did not conduct any activities other than those incidental to the formation of it and Merger Sub and the matters contemplated by the BCA and had no operations and no material assets or liabilities.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported financial position at the date of the financial statements and the reported results of operations during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The following are some, but not all, of such estimates: the determination of chargebacks, sales returns, rebates, bill backs, allowances for accounts receivable, accrued liabilities, valuation of inventory balances, the determination of useful lives for product rights and the assessment of expected cash flows used in evaluating goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers and associated ASUs (collectively "Topic 606"), which sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific sections of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed.

When assessing its revenue recognition, the Company performs the following five steps in accordance with Topic 606: (i) identify the contract with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligation. The Company recognizes revenue when it transfers control of its products to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those products. For further details on the Company’s revenue recognition policies under Topic 606, refer to Note 4. Revenue Recognition.

A rollforward of the major categories of sales-related deductions for the six months ended June 30, 2018 is as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Contract Charge-backs and Sales Volume Allowances
 
Cash Discount Allowances
 
Accrued Returns Allowance
 
Accrued Medicaid and Commercial Rebates
January 1, 2018
 
$
453,703

 
$
20,408

 
$
45,175

 
$
12,911

Liabilities assumed from acquisitions

221,561


11,781


91,704


49,743

Provision related to sales recorded in the period
 
1,401,440

 
47,607

 
24,717

 
33,546

Credits issued during the period
 
(1,360,391
)
 
(49,495
)
 
(25,163
)
 
(26,002
)
Balance at June 30, 2018
 
$
716,313

 
$
30,301

 
$
136,433

 
$
70,198



Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation consists of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) awarded to employees and non-employee directors. Stock options are measured at their fair value on the grant date or date of modification, as applicable. RSUs are measured at the stock price on the grant date or date of modification, as applicable. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service and/or performance period, as applicable. Forfeitures of awards are accounted for as a reduction in stock-based compensation expense in the period such awards are forfeited. The Company's policy is to issue new shares upon option exercises and RSUs vesting.

Foreign Currencies

The Company has operations in the U.S., Switzerland, India, the U.K., Ireland, and other international jurisdictions. The results of its non-U.S. dollar based operations are translated to U.S. Dollars at the average exchange rates during the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the balance sheet date. Investment accounts are translated at historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments are accumulated in a separate component of stockholders’/ members’ deficit in the consolidated balance sheet and are included in the determination of comprehensive income. Transaction gains and losses are included in the determination of net income in the Company consolidated statements of operations as a component of foreign exchange gains and losses. Such foreign currency transaction gains and losses include fluctuations related to long term intercompany loans that are payable in the foreseeable future.

Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method, the acquiring entity in a business combination records the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition at their fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related costs, primarily professional fees, are expensed as incurred.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. A portion of the Company’s cash flows are derived outside the U.S. As a result, the Company is subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company maintains cash balances at both U.S. based and foreign based commercial banks. At various times during the year, cash balances in the U.S. may exceed amounts that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Restricted Cash

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, the Company had restricted cash balances of $7.1 million and $3.8 million in its bank accounts primarily related to the purchase of certain land and equipment.






Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is management’s best estimate of the amount of probable collection losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Management determines the allowance based on historical experience along with the present knowledge of potentially uncollectible accounts. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management believes it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to customers.

Inventories

Inventories consist of finished goods held for sale, raw materials, and work in process. Inventories are stated at net realizable value, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. Adjustments for excess and obsolete inventories are established based upon historical experience and management’s assessment of current product demand. These assessments include inventory obsolescence based on its expiration date, damaged or rejected product, and slow-moving products.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows:
Asset Classification
 
Estimated Useful Life
Buildings
 
30 years
Computer equipment
 
5 years
Furniture and fixtures
 
7 years
Leasehold improvements
 
Shorter of asset's useful life or remaining life of lease
Machinery and equipment
 
7 years
Vehicles
 
5 years


Upon retirement or disposal, the cost of the asset disposed and the accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is reflected as part of operating income in the period of disposal. Expenditures that significantly increase value or extend useful lives of property, plant, and equipment are capitalized, whereas those for normal maintenance and repairs are expensed. The Company capitalizes interest on borrowings during the construction period of major capital projects as part of the related asset and amortizes the capitalized interest into earnings over the related asset’s remaining useful life.

In-Process Research and Development

The fair value of in-process research and development ("IPR&D") acquired in a business combination is determined based on the present value of each research project’s projected cash flows using an income approach. Revenues are estimated based on relevant market size and growth factors, expected industry trends, individual project life cycles and the life of each research project’s underlying marketability. In determining the fair value of each research project, expected cash flows are adjusted for certain risks of completion, including technical and regulatory risk.

The value attributable to IPR&D projects at the time of acquisition is capitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset and tested for impairment until the project is completed or abandoned. Upon completion of the project, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is then accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset and amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. If the project is abandoned, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is charged to expense.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives including IPR&D are tested for impairment if impairment indicators arise and, at a minimum, annually. However, an entity is permitted to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test consists of a one-step analysis that compares the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company considers many factors in evaluating whether the value of its intangible assets with indefinite lives may not be recoverable, including, but not limited to, expected growth rates, the cost of equity and debt capital, general economic conditions, the Company's outlook and market performance of the Company's industry and recent and forecasted financial performance.

Goodwill

Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, is carried at cost. Goodwill is not amortized; rather, it is subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. The Company reviews goodwill for possible impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The impairment model prescribes a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. However, an entity is permitted to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the two-step goodwill impairment test is necessary. The qualitative factors considered by the Company may include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, the Company’s outlook, market performance of the Company’s industry and recent and forecasted financial performance. Further testing is only required if the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. In the first step, the Company determines the fair value of its reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the net book value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company then performs the second step of the impairment test, which requires allocation of the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities using the acquisition method prescribed under authoritative guidance for business combinations with any residual fair value being allocated to goodwill. An impairment charge is recognized when the implied fair value of the Company’s reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount.

Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation of impairment may affect the carrying value of long-lived assets, which could result in impairment charges in future periods. Such assumptions include projections of future cash flows and the current fair value of the asset.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (Including Intangible Assets with Finite Lives)

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company evaluates assets for potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted net cash flows to the carrying amount of the asset. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and fair value which is generally an expected present value cash flow technique. Management’s policy in determining whether an impairment indicator exists comprises measurable operating performance criteria as well as other qualitative measures.

Intangible assets, other than indefinite-lived intangible assets, are amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset based on the pattern in which the economic benefits are expected to be consumed or otherwise used up or, if that pattern is not readily determinable, on a straight-line basis. The useful life is the period over which the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. Intangible assets are not written-off in the period of acquisition unless they become impaired during that period.

The Company regularly evaluates the remaining useful life of each intangible asset that is being amortized to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. If the estimate of the intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires the recognition of tax benefits or expenses on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of its assets and liabilities by applying the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Such net tax effects on temporary differences are reflected on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when the Company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

ASC 740-10 prescribes a two-step approach for the recognition and measurement of tax benefits associated with the positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. The Company has reviewed and will continue to review the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions, which may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on ongoing analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. To the extent that the Company’s assessment of the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions changes as a result of the evaluation of new information, such change in estimate will be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. The Company reports income tax-related interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions, if applicable, as a component of income tax expense.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes net income and all changes in equity for cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the consolidation of foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements.

Research and Development

Research and development ("R&D") activities are expensed as incurred. Primarily R&D costs consist of direct and allocated expenses incurred with the process of formulation, clinical research, and validation associated with new product development. Upfront and milestone payments made to third parties in connection with R&D collaborations are expensed as incurred up to the point of regulatory approval or when there is no alternative future use. Payments made to third parties subsequent to regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the respective intangible asset. Amounts capitalized for such payments are included in intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization.

Intellectual Property Legal Development Expenses

The Company expenses external intellectual property legal development expenses as incurred. These costs relate to legal challenges of innovator’s patents for invalidity or non-infringement, which are customary in the generic pharmaceutical industry, and are incurred predominately during development of a product and prior to regulatory approval. Associated costs include, but are not limited to, formulation assessments, patent challenge opinions and strategy, and litigation expenses to defend the intellectual property supporting the Company' regulatory filings.

Shipping Costs

The Company records the costs of shipping product to its customers as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses as incurred. Shipping costs were $4.6 million, and $8.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Shipping costs were $1.5 million, and $3.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, including combining depreciation and amortization expense into the respective cost of goods sold, selling, general and administrative and research and development expense presentation on the statement of operations as well as combining accounts payable and accrued expenses in the balance sheet presentation.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The guidance will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), to clarify how entities should present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The guidance requires entities to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows.

As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The guidance should be applied retrospectively and is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company early adopted ASU 2016-18 on January 1, 2018. This guidance was applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts have been revised.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, that will require companies to account for the income tax effects of intercompany transfers of assets other than inventory (e.g., intangible assets) when the transfer occurs. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period (i.e., early adoption is permitted only in the first interim period). The Company early adopted ASU 2016-16 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have an effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), to clarify how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The guidance will be applied retrospectively and is effective for the Company for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Subsequent to the issuance of Topic 606, the FASB clarified the guidance through several Accounting Standard Updates. This guidance represents a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which that company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. This update sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed.

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and associated ASU's (collectively "Topic 606"), using the modified retrospective method, applied to all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. This method requires the cumulative effect of the adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption.

The Company recorded a $5.0 million reduction to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adoption Topic 606. There is an acceleration of revenue for certain product sale arrangements which are designed to include profit share payments upon the customer’s sell-through of certain products purchased from the Company. Previously under Topic 605, the Company deferred revenue until its customers sold the product through to their end customers, at which point the Company considered the profit share payments to be earned and collection reasonably assured. Under Topic 606, an estimate of the profit share payments is included in the transaction price as variable consideration and is recognized at the time the Company transfers control of the product to its customer. This change resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment upon adoption of the ASU as of January 1, 2018 which was not material to the financial statements. In the second quarter of 2018, the Company made a correction to the cumulative impact adjustment as of January 1, 2018 by reducing accumulated deficit by $1.7 million. The Company does not believe that this adjustment is material to its financial statements and it had no impact on any prior periods. Refer to Note 4. Revenue Recognition for additional disclosures required by Topic 606.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment that eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value (i.e., measure the charge based on today’s Step 1). The standard will be applied prospectively and is effective for the Company’s annual and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, guidance that changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost and require entities to record allowances for available-for-sale debt securities rather than reduce the carrying amount, as they do today under the other-than-temporary impairment model. It also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The guidance is effective for the Company for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
Acquisitions
Acquisitions

Impax Acquisition

On May 4, 2018, the Company completed the Combination, as described in Note 1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, transaction costs associated with the Impax acquisition of $16.4 million and $23.3 million, respectively, were recorded in acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses.

The Impax acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, with Amneal as the accounting acquirer of Impax. Amneal was identified as the accounting acquirer because: (i) Amneal exchanged Amneal Common Units with the Company for the Company’s interest in Impax, (ii) Holdings held a majority interest in the Company with an effective voting interest of approximately 75% on a fully diluted and as converted basis through their ownership of Class B Common Stock, and (iii) a majority of the directors on the Company's current board of directors were designated by Holdings. As such, the cost to acquire Impax was allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the closing date of the Combination.

The measurement of the consideration transferred by Amneal for its interest in Impax is based on the fair value of the equity interest that Amneal would have had to issue to give the Impax shareholders the same percentage equity interest in the Company, which is equal to approximately 25% of Amneal on May 4, 2018. However, the fair value of Impax's common stock was used to calculate the consideration for the Combination because Impax's common stock had a quoted market price and the Combination involved only the exchange of equity.

The purchase price, net of cash acquired, is calculated as follows (in thousands, except share amount and price per share):

Fully diluted Impax share number (1)
 
73,288,792

Closing quoted market price of an Impax common share on May 4, 2018
 
$
18.30

Equity consideration - subtotal
 
$
1,341,185

Add: Fair value of Impax stock options as of May 4, 2018 (2)
 
22,610

Total equity consideration
 
1,363,795

Add: Extinguishment of certain Impax obligations, including accrued and unpaid interest
 
320,290

Less: Cash acquired
 
(37,907
)
Purchase price, net of cash acquired
 
$
1,646,178

(1) Represents shares of Impax Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Combination
 
 
(2) Represents the fair value of 3.0 million fully vested Impax stock options valued using the Black-Scholes options pricing model.
 
 


The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price allocation for the Impax acquisition (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
As of June 30, 2018
Trade accounts receivable, net
 
$
206,749

Inventories
 
182,546

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
91,415

Property, plant and equipment
 
87,472

Goodwill
 
358,813

Intangible assets
 
1,606,642

Other
 
57,084

   Total assets acquired
 
2,590,721

Accounts payable
 
47,912

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
262,838

Long-term debt
 
600,000

Other long-term liabilities
 
33,793

   Total liabilities assumed
 
944,543

Net assets acquired
 
$
1,646,178



Intangible Assets

The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
 
Weighted Average Useful Life (Years)
Marketed product rights
 
$
1,063,040

 
12.9


In addition to the amortizable intangible assets noted above, $543.6 million was allocated to IPR&D, which is currently not subject to amortization.

The estimated fair value of the in-process research and development and identifiable intangible assets was determined using the “income approach,” which is a valuation technique that provides an estimate of the fair value of an asset based on market participant expectations of the cash flows an asset would generate over its remaining useful life. The assumptions, including the expected projected cash flows, utilized in the preliminary purchase price allocation and in determining the purchase price were based on management's best estimates as of the closing date of the Combination on May 4, 2018.

Some of the more significant assumptions inherent in the development of those asset valuations include the estimated net cash flows for each year for each asset or product (including net revenues, cost of sales, research and development costs, selling and marketing costs and working capital / contributory asset charges), the appropriate discount rate to select in order to measure the risk inherent in each future cash flow stream, the assessment of each asset’s life cycle, the potential regulatory and commercial success risks, competitive trends impacting the asset and each cash flow stream, as well as other factors. No assurances can be given that the underlying assumptions used to prepare the discounted cash flow analysis will not change. For these and other reasons, actual results may vary significantly from estimated results.

Goodwill

Of the total goodwill acquired in connection with the Impax acquisition, approximately $346 million has been allocated to the Company’s Specialty Pharma segment and approximately $13 million allocated to the Generic Segment. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the expected revenue and cost synergies of the combined company. Factors that contributed to the Company’s recognition of goodwill include the Company’s intent to expand its generic and specialty product portfolios and to acquire certain benefits from the Impax product pipelines, in addition to the anticipated synergies that the Company expects to generate from the acquisition.

Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition

On May 7, 2018, the Company acquired 98.0% of the outstanding equity interests in Gemini Laboratories, LLC ("Gemini") for total consideration of $119.5 million, net of $3.9 million cash acquired. At closing, the acquisition was funded by a $42.9 million up-front cash payment (including $2.9 million related to a preliminary working capital adjustment) from cash on hand and a $77.2 million unsecured promissory note. The note payable bears interest at 3% annually and is due on November 7, 2018. Additionally, at June 30, 2018, the Company recorded a liability in related-party payables of $3.3 million for a payment due in August 2018 related to the final working capital adjustment. In connection with the acquisition of Gemini, the Company recorded an amount representing the non-controlling interest of Gemini of $3.0 million.

Gemini is a pharmaceutical company with a portfolio that includes licensed and owned, niche and mature branded products, and a pipeline of 505(b)(2) products for niche therapeutic areas. Gemini was a related party of the Company; refer to Note 20. Related-Party Transactions for further details.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, transaction costs associated with the Gemini acquisition of $0.4 million were recorded in acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses. The Gemini acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.

The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price allocation for the Gemini acquisition (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
As of June 30, 2018
Trade accounts receivable, net
 
$
8,158

Inventories
 
1,851

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
3,713

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
11

Goodwill
 
2,527

Intangible assets
 
142,740

Other
 
465

   Total assets acquired
 
159,465

 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
1,764

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
15,189

License liability
 
20,000

   Total liabilities assumed
 
36,953

Net assets acquired
 
$
122,512



The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
 
Weighted Average Useful Life
Product rights for licensed / developed technology
 
$
110,350

 
10 years
Product rights for developed technologies
 
5,500

 
9 years
Product rights for out-licensed generics royalty agreement
 
390

 
2 years
 
 
$
116,240

 
 


In addition to the amortizable intangibles noted above, $26.5 million was allocated to IPR&D, which is currently not subject to amortization.

The goodwill recognized of $2.5 million is allocated to the Company's Specialty Pharma segment.

The Company's consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 include the results of operations of Impax and Gemini subsequent to May 4, 2018 and May 7, 2018, respectively. Impax contributed to net revenue of $118.3 million and losses of $55.9 million and Gemini contributed net revenue of $5.0 million and income of $1.0 million for the period from each respective acquisition date to June 30, 2018.

The Company makes an initial allocation of the purchase price at the date of acquisition based upon its understanding of the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities.  The Company obtains this information during due diligence and through other sources.  In the months after closing, as the Company obtains additional information about these assets and liabilities and learns more about the newly acquired business, it is able to refine the estimates of fair value and more accurately allocate the purchase price.  Only items identified as of the acquisition date are considered for subsequent adjustment.  The Company is continuing to evaluate certain pre-acquisition contingencies associated with its 2018 acquisitions. The Company will make appropriate adjustments to the purchase price allocation prior to completion of the measurement period, as required.

The unaudited pro forma combined results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (assuming the closing of the Combination occurred on January 1, 2017) are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
2017
 
2018
2017
Net revenue
 
$
447,524

$
461,953

 
$
865,068

$
872,037

Net loss
 
$
(86,621
)
$
(4,197
)
 
$
(161,050
)
$
(340,311
)
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 
$
(19,759
)
$
(1,957
)
 
$
(28,454
)
$
(141,691
)


The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the closing of the Combination taken place on January 1, 2017. Furthermore, the pro forma results do not purport to project the future results of operations of the Company.

The unaudited pro forma information reflects primarily the following non-recurring adjustments (all of which were adjusted for the applicable tax impact):
Adjustments to costs of goods sold related to the inventory acquired; and
Adjustments to selling, general and administrative expense related to transaction costs directly attributable to the transactions.
v3.10.0.1
Revenue Recognition
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]  
Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition

Performance Obligations

The Company’s performance obligation is the supply of finished generic pharmaceutical products to its customers. The Company’s customers consist primarily of major wholesalers, retail pharmacies, managed care organizations, purchasing co-ops, hospitals, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies. The Company’s customer contracts generally consist of both a master agreement, which is signed by the Company and its customer, and a customer submitted purchase order, which is governed by the terms and conditions of the master agreement. Customers purchase product by direct channel sales from the Company or by indirect channel sales through various distribution channels.

Revenue is recognized when the Company transfers control of its products to the customer, which typically occurs at a point-in-time, upon delivery. Substantially all of the Company’s net revenues relate to products which are transferred to the customer at a point-in-time.

The Company offers standard payment terms to its customers and has elected the practical expedient to not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing, since the period between when the Company transfers the product to the customer and when the customer pays for that product is one year or less. Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues. The consideration amounts due from customers as a result of product sales are subject to variable consideration, as described further below.

The Company offers standard product warranties which provide assurance that the product will function as expected and in accordance with specifications. Customers cannot purchase warranties separately and these warranties do not give rise to a separate performance obligation.

The Company permits the return of product under certain circumstances, mainly upon product expiration, instances of shipping errors or where product is damaged in transit. The Company accrues for the customer’s right to return as part of its variable consideration. See below for further details.

Variable Consideration

The Company includes an estimate of variable consideration in its transaction price at the time of sale, when control of the product transfers to the customer. Variable consideration includes but is not limited to: chargebacks, rebates, group purchasing organization ("GPO") fees, prompt payment (cash) discounts, consideration payable to the customer, billbacks, Medicaid and other government pricing programs, price protection and shelf stock adjustments, sales returns, and profit shares.

The Company estimates its variable consideration using the expected value method, which is the sum of probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts, and represents the method that best predicts the amount of consideration to which the Company will be entitled to for transferring its products to its customers. The Company assesses whether or not an estimate of its variable consideration is constrained and has determined that the constraint does not apply, since it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue will not occur in the future when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The Company’s estimates for variable consideration are adjusted as required at each reporting period for specific known developments that may result in a change in the amount of total consideration it expects to receive.

Chargebacks

In the case an indirect customer purchases product from their preferred wholesaler instead of directly from the Company, and the contract price charged to the indirect customer is lower than the wholesaler pricing, the Company pays the direct customer (wholesaler) a chargeback for the price differential. The Company estimates its chargeback accrual based on its estimates of the level of inventory of its products in the distribution channel that remain subject to chargebacks and historical chargeback rates. The estimate of the level of products in the distribution channel is based primarily on data provided by key customers.

Rebates

The Company pays fixed or volume-based rebates to its customers based on a fixed amount, fixed percentage of product sales or based on the achievement of a specified level of purchases. The Company’s rebate accruals are based on actual net sales, contractual rebate rates negotiated with customers, and expected purchase volumes / corresponding tiers based on actual sales to date and forecasted amounts.

Group Purchasing Organization Fees

The Company pays fees to GPOs for administrative services that the GPOs perform in connection with the purchases of product by the GPO participants who are the Company’s customers. The Company’s GPO fee accruals are based on actual net sales, contractual fee rates negotiated with GPOs and the mix of the products in the distribution channel that remain subject to GPO fees.

Prompt payment (cash) discounts

The Company provides customers with prompt payment discounts which may result in adjustments to the price that is invoiced for the product transferred, in the case that payments are made within a defined period. The Company’s prompt payment discount accruals are based on actual net sales and contractual discount rates.

Consideration payable to the customer

The Company pays administrative and service fees to its customers based on a fixed percentage of the product price. These fees are not in exchange for a distinct good or service and therefore are recognized as a reduction of the transaction price. The Company accrues for these fees based on actual net sales, contractual fee rates negotiated with the customer and the mix of the products in the distribution channel that remain subject to fees.

Billbacks

In the case an indirect customer purchases product from their preferred wholesaler instead of directly from the Company, and the contract price charged to the indirect customer is higher than contractual pricing, the Company pays the indirect customer a billback for the price differential. The Company estimates its billback accrual based on its estimates of the level of inventory of its products in the distribution channel that remain subject to billbacks and historical billback rates. The estimate of the level of products in the distribution channel is based primarily on data provided by key customers.

Medicaid and other government pricing programs

The Company complies with required rebates mandated by law under Medicaid and other government pricing programs. The Company estimates its government pricing accruals based on monthly sales, historical experience of claims submitted by the various states and jurisdictions, historical rates and estimated lag time of the rebate invoices.

Price protection and shelf stock adjustments

The Company provides customers with price protection and shelf stock adjustments which may result in an adjustment to the price charged for the product transferred, based on differences between old and new prices which may be applied to the customer’s on-hand inventory at the time of the price change. The Company accrues for these adjustments when its expected value of an adjustment is greater than zero, based on contractual pricing, actual net sales, accrual rates based on historical average rates, and estimates of the level of inventory of its products in the distribution channel that remain subject to these adjustments. The estimate of the level of products in the distribution channel is based primarily on data provided by key customers.

Sales returns

The Company permits the return of product under certain circumstances, mainly upon product expiration, instances of shipping errors or where product is damaged in transit, and occurrences of product recalls. The Company’s product returns accrual is primarily based on estimates of future product returns based generally on actual net sales, estimates of the level of inventory of its products in the distribution channel that remain subject to returns, estimated lag time of returns and historical return rates. The estimate of the level of products in the distribution channel is based primarily on data provided by key customers.

Profit Shares

For certain product sale arrangements, the Company earns a profit share upon the customer’s sell-through of the product purchased from the Company. The Company estimates its profit shares based on actual net sales, estimates of the level of inventory of its products in the distribution channel that remain subject to profit shares, and historical rates of profit shares earned. The estimate of the level of products in the distribution channel is based primarily on data provided by key customers.

Concentration of Revenue

The Company's three largest customers account for approximately 82% of total gross sales of products for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 80% for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The Company's three largest customers account for approximately 79% of total gross sales of products for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 82% of total gross sales of products for the six months ended June 30, 2017
v3.10.0.1
Alliance and Collaboration
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Alliance and Collaboration
Alliance and Collaboration

The Company has entered into several alliance, collaboration, license and distribution agreements, and similar agreements with respect to certain of its products and services, with third-party pharmaceutical companies. The consolidated statements of operations include revenue recognized under agreements the Company has entered into to develop marketing and/or distribution relationships with its partners to fully leverage the technology platform and revenue recognized under development agreements which generally obligate the Company to provide research and development services over multiple periods.  The Company's significant arrangements are discussed below.

Biosimilar Licensing and Supply Agreement

On May 7, 2018, the Company entered into a licensing and supply agreement, with Mabxience S.L., for its biosimilar candidate for Avastin® (bevacizumab). The Company will be the exclusive partner in the U.S. market. The Company will pay up-front, development and regulatory milestone payments as well as commercial milestone payments on reaching pre-agreed sales targets in the market to Mabxience, up to $71.8 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company expensed a milestone payment of $0.5 million in research and development expense.

License and Commercialization Agreement
On October 1, 2017, Amneal and Adello Biologics, LLC (“Adello”), a related party, entered into a license and commercialization agreement. Adello granted Amneal an exclusive license, under its New Drug Application, to distribute and sell two bio-similar products in the U.S. Adello is responsible for development, regulatory filings, obtaining FDA approval, and manufacturing, and Amneal is responsible for marketing, selling and pricing activities. The term of the agreement is 10-years from the respective product’s launch date.
In connection with the agreement, Amneal paid an upfront amount of $1.5 million in October 2017 for execution of the agreement which was expensed in research and development expenses. The agreement also provides for potential future milestone payments to Adello of (i) up to $21.0 million relating to regulatory approval, (ii) up to $43.0 million for successful delivery of commercial launch inventory, (iii) between $20.0 million and $50.0 million relating to number of competitors at launch for one product, and (iv) between $15 million and $67.5 million for the achievement of cumulative net sales for both products. The milestones are subject to certain performance conditions which may or may not be achieved, including FDA filing, FDA approval, launch activities and commercial sales volume objectives. In addition, the agreement provides for Amneal to pay a profit share equal to 50% of net profits, after considering manufacturing and marketing costs. The research and development expenses for payments made to Adello during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were immaterial.
Distribution, License, Development and Supply Agreement with AstraZeneca UK Limited

In January 2012, the Impax entered into an agreement with AstraZeneca UK Limited to distribute branded products under the terms of a Distribution, License, Development and Supply Agreement ("AZ Agreement"). The parties subsequently entered into a First Amendment to the AZ Agreement dated May 31, 2016 (as amended, the "AZ Amendment"). Under the terms of the AZ Agreement, AstraZeneca granted to Impax an exclusive license to commercialize the tablet, orally disintegrating tablet and nasal spray formulations of Zomig® (zolmitriptan) products for the treatment of migraine headaches in the United States and in certain U.S. territories, except during an initial transition period when AstraZeneca fulfilled all orders of Zomig® products on Impax’s behalf and AstraZeneca paid to Impax the gross profit on such Zomig® products. Under the terms of the AZ Amendment, under certain conditions and depending on the nature and terms of the study agreed to with the FDA, Impax agreed to conduct, at its own expense, the juvenile toxicity study and pediatric study required by the FDA under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”) for approval of the nasal formulation of Zomig® for the acute treatment of migraine in pediatric patients ages six through eleven years old, as further described in the study protocol mutually agreed to by the parties (the “PREA Study”). In consideration for Impax conducting the PREA Study at its own expense, the AZ Amendment provides for the total royalty payments payable by Impax to AstraZeneca on net sales of Zomig® products under the AZ Agreement to be reduced by certain specified amounts beginning from the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and through the quarter ended December 31, 2020, with such reduced royalty amounts totaling an aggregate amount of $30.0 million. In the event the royalty reduction amounts exceed the royalty payments payable by Impax to AstraZeneca pursuant to the AZ Agreement in any given quarter, AstraZeneca will be required to pay Impax an amount equal to the difference between the royalty reduction amount and the royalty payment payable by Impax to AstraZeneca. Impax’s commitment to perform the PREA Study may be terminated, without penalty, under certain circumstances as set forth in the AZ Amendment.

In May 2013, Impax’s exclusivity period for branded Zomig® tablets and orally disintegrating tablets expired and Impax launched authorized generic versions of those products in the United States. As discussed above, pursuant to the AZ Amendment, the total royalty payments payable by Impax to AstraZeneca on net sales of Zomig® products under the AZ Agreement is reduced by certain specified amounts beginning from the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and through the quarter ended December 31, 2020, with such reduced royalty amounts totaling an aggregate amount of $30.0 million. The Company recorded cost of sales for royalties under this agreement of $1.0 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
v3.10.0.1
Restructuring and Other Charges
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]  
Restructuring and Other Charges
Restructuring and Other Charges

Restructuring Charges

During the second quarter of 2018, in connection with the Combination, the Company committed to a restructuring plan to achieve cost savings. The Company expects to integrate its operations and reduce its combined cost structure through workforce reductions that eliminate duplicative positions and the consolidation of certain administrative, manufacturing and research and development facilities. In connection with this plan, the Company announced on May 10, 2018 that it will close its Hayward, California based operations (the "Plan"). Employee separation charges include the cost of benefits provided pursuant to the Company’s severance programs for employees at the Company's Hayward facility and other facilities. 

The Company recorded charges for restructuring as follows (in thousands):


Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017
Employee separation charges
$
44,465


$


$
44,465


$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The charges related to restructuring impacted segment earnings as follows (in thousands):


Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Generic
24,797

 
$

 
24,797

 
$

Specialty
2,421

 

 
2,421

 

Corporate
17,247

 

 
17,247

 

   Total restructuring charges
$
44,465

 
$

 
$
44,465

 
$



The following table shows the change in the employee separation-related liability associated with the Company's restructuring programs (in thousands):


Employee Separation
Balance at December 31, 2017
$

Liabilities assumed in Impax acquisition
2,199

Charges to income
44,465

Payments
(6,353
)
Balance at June 30, 2018
$
40,311



As of June 30, 2018, the Company currently estimates that it will incur additional aggregate cash expenditures of approximately $50.0 million to $60.0 million related to severance and other employee costs in connection with the Plan over the next 18 months. Since the Company is in the early stages of implementing the Plan, the amount and timing of any cash expenditures related to dismantling and asset removal and other site exit costs cannot be estimated at this time. As the Plan is implemented, the Company's management will reevaluate the estimated expenses and charges set forth above and may revise its estimates as appropriate.
v3.10.0.1
Acquisition, Transaction-Related and Integration Expenses
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
Acquisition, Transaction-Related and Integration Expenses
Acquisition, Transaction-Related and Integration Expenses

The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.


Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2018

2017

2018
 
2017
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses 1
$
21,008


$
82


$
28,143


$
82

Profit Participation Units 2
158,757




158,757



Transaction-related bonus 3
27,742




27,742



Total
$
207,507


$
82


$
214,642


$
82


1 Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses include professional service fees (e.g. legal, investment banking and accounting), information technology systems conversions, and contract termination/ renegotiation costs.
2 Profit Participation Units expense relates to the accelerated vesting of certain of Amneal's profit participation units that occurred prior to the Closing of the Combination for current and former employees of Amneal for service prior to the Combination (see additional information in the paragraph below and Note 18. Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit).
3 Transaction-related bonus is a cash bonus that was funded by Holdings for employees of Amneal for service prior to the closing of the Combination (see additional information in Note 18., Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit).

Accelerated Vesting of Profit Participation Units

Amneal’s historical capital structure included several classifications of membership and profit participation units. During the second quarter of 2018, the Board of Managers of Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC approved a discretionary modification to certain profit participation units concurrent with the Combination that immediately caused the vesting of all profit participation units that were previously issued to certain current or former employees for service prior to the Combination. The modification entitled the holders to 6,886,140 shares of Class A Common Stock with a fair value of $126.0 million on the date of the Combination and $32.8 million of cash. The cash and shares will be distributed by Holdings with no additional shares issued by the Company. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded a charge in acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and a corresponding capital contribution of $158.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
v3.10.0.1
Income taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income taxes
Income taxes

As a result of the Combination (refer to Note 1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation), the Company became the sole managing member of Amneal, with Amneal being the predecessor for accounting purposes. The operations of Amneal are conducted through a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal and for most applicable state and local income tax purposes. As a partnership, Amneal is not subject to U.S. federal and certain state and local income taxes. Any taxable income or loss generated by Amneal is passed through to and included in the taxable income or loss of its members, including the Company, on a pro rata basis subject to applicable tax regulations. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state and local income taxes, with respect to its allocable share of any taxable income or loss of Amneal, as well as any stand-alone income or loss generated by the Company. Additionally, Amneal provides for income taxes in the various foreign jurisdictions in which it operates.

In connection with the Combination, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset for its outside basis difference in its investment in Amneal which was $303.2 million at May 4, 2018. Also in connection with the Combination, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset of $54.6 million related to the net operating loss of Impax from January 1, 2018 through May 4, 2018 as well as certain federal and state credits of Impax that were attributable to the Company.

The Company records a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. As of June 30, 2018, the Company concluded, based on the weight of all available positive and negative evidence, those deferred tax assets recorded as part of the Combination are more likely than not to be realized. As such, no valuation allowance was recognized. The Company maintains a valuation allowance against Amneal's foreign jurisdiction tax attributes.

In connection with the Combination, the Company entered into a tax receivable agreement ("TRA") for which it is generally required to pay to the other holders of Amneal Common Units 85% of the applicable tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal and state income tax that the Company deemed to realize as a result of certain tax attributes of their Amneal Units sold to the Company (or exchanged in a taxable sale) and that are created as a result of (i) the sales of their Amneal Units for shares of Class A common stock and (ii) tax benefits attributable to payments made under the tax receivable agreement (including imputed interest). In connection with the exchanges which occurred as part of the PIPE Investment and the Closing Date Redemption (Note 1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation), the Company recorded a TRA liability of $194.8 million. Such amounts will be paid when such deferred tax assets are realized as a reduction to income taxes due or payable.
 
The Company’s (benefit from) provision for income taxes and effective tax rates were $(12.4) million and (4.7)% and $1.9 million and 4.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s (benefit from) provision for income taxes and effective tax rates were $(12.1) million and (5.7)% and $2.9 million and 3.4%, respectively.

The primary change in the (benefit from) provision is due to only certain limited liability company entity-level taxes and foreign taxes being recorded for Amneal prior to the Combination. Subsequent to May 4, 2018, federal income taxes were also provided related to the Company’s allocable share of income (losses) from Amneal at the prevailing U.S. federal, state, and local corporate income tax rates.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted in the United States, which significantly reforms U.S. tax legislation. In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118, which provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the enactment date for companies to complete the accounting for the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  The Company will continue to evaluate the legislative changes during the measurement period allowed under SAB 118.

Given the complexity of the global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") provisions, the Company is still evaluating the effects of the GILTI provisions and has not yet determined its accounting policy. The Company's accounting policy election with respect to the new GILTI Tax rules will depend, in part, on analyzing global income to determine whether a reasonably estimate can be made.  While the Company currently does not believe GILTI will have a material impact on its 2018 income tax provision, the Company has not completed its analysis and has not determined which method to elect. Adjustments related to the amount of GILTI tax recorded in the Company's consolidated financial statements may be required based on the outcome of this election.
v3.10.0.1
Earnings per Share
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]  
Earnings per Share
Earnings per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$
(19,104
)
 

 
$
(19,104
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A and Class B-1 basic and diluted
127,112

 

 
127,112

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss per share attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A and Class B-1 basic and diluted
$
(0.15
)
 
 
 
$
(0.15
)
 
 


The allocation of net loss to the holders of shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B-1 Common Stock began following the closing of the Combination on May 4, 2018. Therefore, the net loss per share is the same for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company excluded outstanding stock options and restricted stock units from the computation of diluted net loss per share because their effect is antidilutive.

Shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock do not share in the earnings or losses of the Company and, therefore, are not participating securities. Shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock are, however, considered potentially dilutive shares of Class A Common Stock. Under the if converted method, 171,261 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2018 were determined to be anti-dilutive and have therefore been excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per share.
v3.10.0.1
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Receivables [Abstract]  
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net

Trade accounts receivable, net is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Gross accounts receivable
$
1,375,570

 
$
827,302

Allowance for doubtful accounts
(2,465
)
 
(1,824
)
Contract charge-backs and sales volume allowances
(716,313
)
 
(453,703
)
Cash discount allowances
(30,301
)
 
(20,408
)
Subtotal
(749,079
)
 
(475,935
)
Trade accounts receivable, net
$
626,491

 
$
351,367



Receivables from customers representing 10% or more of the Company’s gross trade accounts receivable reflected three customers at June 30, 2018, equal to 31%, 31%, and 25%, respectively. Receivables from customers representing 10% or more of the Company’s gross trade accounts receivable reflected three customers at December 31, 2017, equal to 36%, 27%, and 19%, respectively.
v3.10.0.1
Inventories
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]  
Inventories
Inventories

Inventories, net of reserves, are comprised of the following (in thousands):


June 30, 2018

December 31, 2017
Raw materials
$
202,760


$
140,051

Work in process
59,156


38,146

Finished goods
250,563


105,841

Inventories
$
512,479


$
284,038

v3.10.0.1
Property, Plant, and Equipment
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]  
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Land
$
22,859

 
$
5,275

Buildings
234,756

 
227,864

Leasehold improvements
93,254

 
70,354

Machinery and equipment
305,899

 
260,637

Furniture and fixtures
10,713

 
18,415

Vehicles
1,511

 
1,517

Computer equipment
29,876

 
26,831

Construction-in-progress
49,920

 
32,235

Total property, plant, and equipment
748,788

 
643,128

    Less: Accumulated depreciation
(179,460
)
 
(156,370
)
           Property, plant, and equipment, net
$
569,328

 
$
486,758


Depreciation recognized and interest capitalized and included in property, plant, and equipment by the Company is as follows:
 
Three Months
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Depreciation
$
15,453

 
$
9,650

 
$
28,443

 
$
19,363



Interest capitalized and included in property, plant, and equipment by the Company during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was immaterial.
v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017 were are follows (in thousands):


For the six months ended June 30, 2018
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
Balance, beginning of period
$
26,444

 
$
28,441

Goodwill acquired during the period
361,340

 

Goodwill divested during the period

 
(3,895
)
Currency translation
(1,309
)
 
1,898

Balance, end of period
$
386,475

 
$
26,444



As of June 30, 2018, $348 million and $38 million of goodwill was allocated to the Specialty Pharma and Generic segments, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, all goodwill was allocated to the Generics segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 goodwill acquired was associated with the Impax and Gemini acquisitions.

Intangible assets at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Amortizing intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product rights
12.4
 
$
1,239,401

 
$
(34,765
)
 
$
1,204,636

 
$
49,700

 
$
(17,210
)
 
$
32,490

Customer relationships
14.9
 
7,264

 
(1,846
)
 
5,418

 
7,421

 
(1,072
)
 
6,349

Marketing authorizations
6.8
 
3,075

 
(118
)
 
2,957

 
76

 
(43
)
 
33

Licenses
11.5
 
3,000

 
(700
)
 
2,300

 
3,000

 
(600
)
 
2,400

Trade names
14.9
 
2,641

 
(671
)
 
1,970

 
2,699

 
(522
)
 
2,177

Total

 
$
1,255,381

 
$
(38,100
)
 
$
1,217,281

 
$
62,896

 
$
(19,447
)
 
$
43,449

In-process research and development

 
571,252

 

 
571,252

 
1,150

 

 
1,150

Total intangible assets
 
 
$
1,826,633

 
$
(38,100
)
 
$
1,788,533

 
$
64,046

 
$
(19,447
)
 
$
44,599



Amortization expense related to intangible assets recognized is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Amortization
$
16,694

 
$
886

 
$
18,454

 
$
1,773










The following table presents future amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter, excluding $571.3 million of in-process research and development intangible assets (in thousands).
 
 
Future Amortization
Remainder of 2018
 
$
52,829

2019
 
115,988

2020
 
128,101

2021
 
144,423

2022
 
147,528

2023
 
125,845

Thereafter
 
502,567

Total
 
$
1,217,281

v3.10.0.1
Other Accounts
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Other Accounts
Other Accounts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Deposits and advances
$
2,310

 
$
1,851

Prepaid insurance
8,993

 
3,154

Prepaid regulatory fees
1,621

 
5,926

Income tax receivable
68,334

 

Other current receivables
19,429

 
15,150

Other prepaid assets
38,909

 
16,315

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
$
139,596

 
$
42,396




Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):


June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 Accounts payable
$
169,046

 
$
70,013

 Accrued returns allowance
136,433

 
45,175

 Accrued compensation
85,663

 
23,954

 Accrued Medicaid and commercial rebates
70,198

 
12,911

 Accrued royalties
20,628

 
2,970

 Estimated Teva and Allergan chargebacks and rebates 1
13,277

 

 Medicaid reimbursement accrual
15,000

 
15,000

 Accrued professional fees
10,213

 
938

 Accrued other
35,176

 
23,818

Total accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
555,634

 
$
194,779



1In connection with Impax's August 2016 acquisition of certain assets from Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. ("Teva") and Allergan plc ("Allergan"), Impax agreed to manage the payment process for certain commercial chargebacks and rebates on behalf of Teva and Allergan related to products each of Teva and Allergan sold into the channel prior to Impax's acquisition of the products. On August 18, 2016, Impax received a payment totaling $42.4 million from Teva and Allergan, which represented their combined estimate of the amount of commercial chargebacks and rebates to be paid by Impax on their behalf to wholesalers who purchased products from Teva and Allergan prior to the closing. Pursuant to the agreed upon transition services, Teva and Allergan are obligated to reimburse Impax for additional payments related to chargebacks and rebates for products they sold into the channel prior to the closing and made on their behalf in excess of the $42.4 million. If the total payments made by Impax on behalf of Teva and Allergan are less than $42.4 million, Impax is obligated to refund the difference to Teva and/or Allergan. As of June 30, 2018, $13.3 million remained in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
v3.10.0.1
Debt
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]  
Debt
Debt

The following is a summary of the Company's total indebtedness (in thousands):


June 30, 2018

December 31, 2017
Senior Credit Facility – Term Loan due May 2025
$
2,699,376


$

Other
624



Senior Credit Facility – Term Loan


1,378,160

Senior Credit Facility – Revolver


75,000

Total debt
2,700,000


1,453,160

Less: debt issuance costs
(37,268
)

(8,715)

Total debt, net of debt issuance costs
2,662,732


1,444,445

Less: current portion of Senior Credit Facility – Revolver


75,000

Less: current portion of long-term debt
21,427


14,171

Total long-term debt, net
$
2,641,305


$
1,355,274




On May 4, 2018 the Company entered into a senior credit agreement that provided a term loan ("Term Loan") with a principal amount of $2.7 billion and an asset backed credit facility ("ABL") under which loans and letters of credit up to a principal amount of $500.0 million are available (principal amount of up to $25 million is available for letters of credit) (collectively, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”). The Term Loan is repayable in equal quarterly installments at a rate of 1.00% of the original principal amount annually, with the balance payable at maturity on May 4, 2025. The Term Loan bears a variable annual interest rate, which is LIBOR plus 3.5% at June 30, 2018. The ABL bears an annual interest rate of 1.5% at June 30, 2018 and matures on May 4, 2023. At June 30, 2018, the ABL had no outstanding borrowings.

The proceeds from the Term Loan were used to finance, in part, the cost of the Combination and to pay off Amneal’s debt and substantially all of Impax’s debt at the close of the Combination. In connection with the refinancing of the Amneal and Impax debt, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

The proceeds of any loans made under the Senior Secured Credit Facility can be used for capital expenditures, acquisitions, working capital needs and other general purposes, subject to covenants as described below. The Company pays a commitment fee based on the average daily unused amount of the ABL at a rate based on average historical excess availability, between 0.25% and 0.375% per annum. At June 30, 2018, the ABL commitment fee rate is 0.375% per annum.

The Company incurred costs associated with the Term Loan of $38.1 million and the ABL of $4.6 million, which have been capitalized and are being are amortized over the life of the applicable debt agreement to interest expense. The Term Loan has been recorded in the balance sheet net of issuance costs. Costs associated with the ABL have been recorded in other assets because there were no borrowings outstanding on the effective date of the ABL. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Term Loan, ABL and historical Amneal debt was $1.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, amortization of deferred financing costs related to the historical Amneal debt was $1.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, create liens on Amneal and its subsidiaries' assets. The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain certain negative covenants that, among other things and subject to certain exceptions, restrict Amneal’s and its subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or guarantees, grant liens, make loans, acquisitions or other investments, dispose of assets, merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate, pay dividends or other payments on capital stock, make optional payments or modify certain debt instruments, modify certain organizational documents, enter into arrangements that restrict the ability to pay dividends or grant liens, or enter into or consummate transactions with affiliates. The ABL Facility also includes a financial covenant whereby Amneal must maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio if certain borrowing conditions are met. The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain customary events of default, subject to certain exceptions. Upon the occurrence of certain events of default, the obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities may be accelerated and the commitments may be terminated. At June 30, 2018, Amneal was in compliance with all covenants.

The Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility requires payments of $13.5 million for the remainder of 2018, $27.0 million a year for the next five years and the balance thereafter.

On June 4, 2018, Impax completed a tender offer to repurchase all of Impax's 2.00% senior notes due 2022. Pursuant to the tender offer, $599.4 million aggregate principal amount of the senior notes was repurchased.

Financing Obligations

The Company has a non-cancelable lease agreement dated October 1, 2012, for two buildings located in Long Island, New York, that are used as an integrated manufacturing and office facility. Amneal was responsible for a portion of the renovation and construction costs, and is deemed, for accounting purposes, to be the owner of the building. As a result, the Company was required to record the property, plant, and equipment and a corresponding financing obligation. The financing obligation is reduced by rental payments through the end of the lease, June 30, 2043.
The remaining financing obligation was $39.5 million and $40.3 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The current portion of the remaining financing obligation was $0.3 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
The monthly payments required under the terms of the non-cancelable lease agreement over the next five years and thereafter as follows (in thousands):

 
  
Payments Due
Remainder of 2018
  
$
2,600

2019
  
5,200

2020
  
5,200

2021
  
5,200

2022
  
5,200

2023
 
5,200

Thereafter
  
101,400

Total
  
$
130,000

v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments

Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability. Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value should maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. To measure fair value, Amneal uses the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques and also includes instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Company evaluates its financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis to determine the appropriate level of classification for each reporting period. The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 (in thousands) (there were no material assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Based on
 
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Compensation Plan asset (1)
 
$
43,213

 
$

 
$
43,213

 
$

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities (1)
 
$
34,213

 
$

 
$
34,213

 
$


1The deferred compensation plan liabilities are non-current liabilities recorded at the value of the amount owed to the plan participants, with changes in value recognized as compensation expense. The calculation of the deferred compensation plan obligation is derived from observable market data by reference to hypothetical investments selected by the participants and is included in other long-term liabilities. The Company invests participant contributions in corporate-owned life insurance policies, for which the cash surrender value is included in other non-current assets.

There were no transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

The Company’s Term Loan falls into the Level 2 category within the fair value level hierarchy. The fair value was determined using market data for valuation. The fair value of the Term Loan at June 30, 2018 was approximately $2.70 billion.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s prior term loan (which was subsequently paid off at the closing of the Combination with the proceeds of the Term Loan) had a fair value of approximately $1.39 billion, which was based upon market data (Level 2).

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

There were no non-recurring fair value measurements during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
v3.10.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies

Contractual Obligations
The Company leases buildings and other tangible property. Rent expense under these leases was $4.3 million and $5.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. Rent expense under these leases was $4.3 million and $8.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. The table below reflects the future minimum lease payments, including reasonably assured renewals, due under these non-cancelable leases as of June 30, 2018 (in thousands):
             
 
  
Operating Leases
Remainder of 2018
  
$
11,910

2019
  
25,338

2020
  
11,840

2021
  
10,537

2022
  
9,613

2023
 
9,278

Thereafter
  
26,529

Total
  
$
105,045



Commitments

Commercial Manufacturing, Collaboration, License, and Distribution Agreements

The Company continues to seek to enhance its product line and develop a balanced portfolio of differentiated products through product acquisitions and in-licensing. Accordingly, the Company, in certain instances, may be contractually obligated to make potential future development, regulatory, and commercial milestone, royalty and/or profit sharing payments in conjunction with collaborative agreements or acquisitions that the Company has entered into with third parties. The Company has also licensed certain technologies or intellectual property from various third parties. The Company is generally required to make upfront payments as well as other payments upon successful completion of regulatory or sales milestones. The agreements generally permit the Company to terminate the agreement with no significant continuing obligation. The Company could be required to make significant payments pursuant to these arrangements. These payments are contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events and, given the nature of these events, it is unclear when, if ever, the Company may be required to pay such amounts. Further, the timing of any future payment is not reasonably estimable.

Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Company's legal proceedings are complex, constantly evolving and subject to uncertainty. As such, the Company cannot predict the outcome or impact of the legal proceedings set forth below. While the Company believes it has valid claims and/or defenses to the matters described below, the nature of litigation is unpredictable and the outcome of the following proceedings could include damages, fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies. For any proceedings where losses are probable and reasonably capable of estimation, the Company accrues for a potential loss. While these accruals have been deemed reasonable by the Company’s management, the assessment process relies heavily on estimates and assumptions that may ultimately prove inaccurate or incomplete. Additionally, unforeseen circumstances or events may lead the Company to subsequently change its estimates and assumptions. Unless otherwise indicated below, the Company is at this time unable to estimate the possible loss, if any, associated with such litigation.

The Company currently intends to vigorously prosecute and/or defend these proceedings as appropriate. From time to time, however, the Company may settle or otherwise resolve these matters on terms and conditions that it believes to be in its best interest. Resolution of any or all claims, legal proceedings or investigations could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and/or cash flow in any given accounting period, or on the Company's overall financial condition.

Additionally, the Company manufactures and derives a portion of its revenue from the sale of pharmaceutical products in the opioid class of drugs, and may therefore face claims arising from the regulation and/or consumption of such products. See "Part II, Item IA. Risk Factors - The development, manufacture and sale of our products involves the risk of product liability and other claims by consumers and other third parties, and insurance against such potential claims is expensive and may be difficult to obtain” for more information.

Although the outcome and costs of the asserted and unasserted claims is difficult to predict, based on the information presently known to management, the Company does not currently expect the ultimate liability, if any, for such matters to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Medicaid Reimbursement Accrual
The Company is required to provide pricing information to state agencies that administer federal Medicaid programs. Certain state agencies have alleged that manufacturers have reported improper pricing information, which allegedly caused them to overpay reimbursement costs. Reserves are periodically established by the Company for any potential claims or settlements of overpayment. Although the Company intends to vigorously defend against any such claims, it had a reserve of approximately $15 million at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The ultimate settlement of any potential liability for such claims may be higher or lower than estimated.

Patent Litigation

There is substantial litigation in the pharmaceutical, biological, and biotechnology industries with respect to the manufacture, use, and sale of new products which are the subject of conflicting patent and intellectual property claims. One or more patents often cover the brand name products for which the Company is developing generic versions and the Company typically has patent rights covering the Company’s branded products.

Under federal law, when a drug developer files an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") for a generic drug seeking approval before expiration of a patent, which has been listed with the FDA as covering the brand name product, the developer must certify its product will not infringe the listed patent(s) and/or the listed patent is invalid or unenforceable (commonly referred to as a “Paragraph IV” certification). Notices of such certification must be provided to the patent holder, who may file a suit for patent infringement within 45 days of the patent holder’s receipt of such notice. If the patent holder files suit within the 45 days period, the FDA can review and approve the ANDA, but is prevented from granting final marketing approval of the product until a final judgment in the action has been rendered in favor of the generic drug developer, or 30 months from the date the notice was received, whichever is sooner. The Company’s generic products division is typically subject to patent infringement litigation brought by branded pharmaceutical manufacturers in connection with the Company’s Paragraph IV certifications seeking an order delaying the approval of the Company’s ANDA until expiration of the patent(s) at issue in the litigation. Likewise, the Company’s branded products division is currently involved in patent infringement litigation against generic drug manufacturers who have filed Paragraph IV certifications to market their generic drugs prior to expiration of the Company’s patents at issue in the litigation.

The uncertainties inherent in patent litigation make the outcome of such litigation difficult to predict. For the Company’s generic products division, the potential consequences in the event of an unfavorable outcome in such litigation include delaying launch of its generic products until patent expiration. If the Company were to launch its generic product prior to successful resolution of a patent litigation, the Company could be liable for potential damages measured by the profits lost by the branded product manufacturer rather than the profits earned by the Company if is found to infringe a valid, enforceable patent. For the Company’s branded products division, an unfavorable outcome may significantly accelerate generic competition ahead of expiration of the patents covering the Company’s branded products. All such litigation typically involves significant expense.

The Company is generally responsible for all of the patent litigation fees and costs associated with current and future products not covered by its alliance and collaboration agreements. The Company has agreed to share legal expenses with respect to third-party and Company products under the terms of certain of the alliance and collaboration agreements. The Company records the costs of patent litigation as expense in the period when incurred for products it has developed, as well as for products which are the subject of an alliance or collaboration agreement with a third-party.

Patent Defense Matters

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Mometasone furoate)

In March 2015, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp filed suit against Amneal in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging patent infringement based on the filing of the Amneal’s ANDA for a generic alternative to Merck’s Nasonex® product. The District Court trial was completed on June 22, 2016. The court issued an opinion finding that Amneal’s proposed generic product did not infringe the asserted patent. Merck filed an appeal of that decision with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s opinion, denied Merck’s request for rehearing, and issued the mandate on May 11, 2018. Amneal launched its generic version of the product on April 5, 2017, prior to the appellate court decision, and continues to sell the product as of June 30, 2018.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, et. al. (Aripiprazole)

In March 2015, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. filed suit against Amneal in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging patent infringement based on the filing of Amneal’s ANDA for a generic alternative to Otsuka’s Abilify® tablet product. Otsuka filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit related to rulings from the District Court regarding some of the patents-in-suit. The District Court has not yet set a trial date for the remaining patents-in-suit. Amneal, like a number of other generic manufacturers, has launched its generic version of Otsuka’s Abilify® “at-risk,” prior to the rendering of an appellate court decision, and continues to sell the product as of June 30, 2018.


Patent Infringement Matters

Impax Laboratories, LLC, et al. v. Lannett Holdings, Inc. and Lannett Company (Zomig®)

In July 2014, Impax filed suit against Lannett Holdings, Inc. and Lannett Company (collectively, “Lannett”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging patent infringement based on the filing of the Lannett ANDA relating to Zolmitriptan Nasal Spray, 5mg, generic to Zomig® Nasal Spray. The case went to trial in September 2016. On March 29, 2017, the District Court issued a Trial Opinion finding the asserted patents valid and infringed. On April 17, 2017, the District Court entered a Final Judgment and Injunction that, inter alia, bars FDA approval of Lannett’s proposed generic product prior to May 29, 2021. On May 12, 2017, Lannett filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On June 28, 2018, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision in full. Lannett has until August 13, 2018 to request a rehearing.

Impax Laboratories, LLC, et al. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Zomig®)

On September 23, 2016, Impax filed suit against Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging patent infringement based on the filing of the Par ANDA relating to Zolmitriptan Nasal Spray, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, generic to Zomig® Nasal Spray. On October 12, 2016, the parties stipulated to stay the case pending the outcome of the related case, Impax Laboratories, LLC, et al. v. Lannett matter described above. On April 24, 2017, the parties stipulated that the stay shall remain in effect until the Impax Laboratories, LLC, et al. v. Lannett matter is fully resolved. On July 10, 2018, Par notified Impax that it had converted its Paragraph IV certification with respect to the sole patent-in-suit to a Paragraph III certification, and requested that Impax dismiss the lawsuit. The stipulation of dismissal was entered into and the lawsuit was dismissed on August 7, 2018.

Impax Laboratories, LLC., et al. v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. and Actavis Pharma Inc. (Rytary®)

In September 2015, Impax filed suit against Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. and Actavis Pharma Inc. (collectively, “Actavis”) in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,094,427; 8,377,474; 8,454,998; 8,557,283; 9,089,607; 9,089,608, based on the filing of the Actavis ANDA relating to carbidopa and levodopa extended release capsules, generic to Rytary®. Impax filed related actions alleging infringement of later-issued U.S. Patent No. 9,463,246 in December 2016 and of later-issued U.S. Patent No. 9,533,046 in May 2017. Both related actions were consolidated with the lead action. On December 15, 2017, the Patent and Trademark Office issued an Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate canceling all claims of the ‘427 patent; the parties subsequently stipulated to dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims relating to the ‘427 patent. Fact discovery and claim construction briefing have concluded and a claim construction hearing was held on April 26, 2017. On May 9, 2017, the District Court issued a decision interpreting certain claim terms in dispute in the litigation. Subject to reservation of all rights to appeal the Court’s May 9, 2017 decision, the parties stipulated to dismiss without prejudice all claims and counterclaims relating to the ‘474, ‘998, and ‘607 patents, and the Court entered an order recognizing this stipulation on June 8, 2017. The parties have completed expert discovery and Actavis filed a summary judgment motion on October 23, 2017. On March 8, 2018, the Court issued an Opinion and Order, granting in part Actavis’s motion for summary judgment. A four day trial was held in May 14, 2018. The parties reached a settlement agreement in June 2018, before post-trial briefing was complete. The case has been dismissed.

Impax Laboratories, LLC. v. Sandoz Inc. (Rytary®)

On March 31, 2017, Impax filed suit against Sandoz Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,094,427; 8,377,474; 8,454,998; 8,557,283; 9,089,607; 9,089,608; 9,463,246; and 9,533,046, based on the filing of Sandoz’s ANDA relating to carbidopa and levodopa extended release capsules, generic to Rytary®. Sandoz answered the complaint on February 28, 2018. Fact discovery has not yet commenced.

Impax Laboratories, LLC. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (Rytary®)

On December 21, 2017, Impax filed suit against Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (collectively, “Zydus”) in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,089,608, based on the filing of Zydus’s ANDA relating to carbidopa and levodopa extended release capsules, generic to Rytary®. Zydus answered the complaint on April 27, 2018, asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,094,427; 8,377,474; 8,454,998; 8,557,283; and 9,089,607. Impax answered Zydus’s counterclaims on June 1, 2018. A case schedule has been set with trial anticipated in February 2020.

Other Litigation Related to the Company’s Business

Solodyn® Antitrust Class Actions

From July 2013 to January 2016, 18 complaints were filed as class actions on behalf of direct and indirect purchasers, as well as by certain direct purchasers, against manufacturers of the brand drug Solodyn® and its generic equivalents, including Impax.

On July 22, 2013, Plaintiff United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On July 23, 2013, Plaintiff Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 1, 2013, Plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of itself and others similarly situated. On August 29, 2013, this Plaintiff withdrew its complaint from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and on August 30, 2013, re-filed the same complaint in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 9, 2013, Plaintiff Local 274 Health & Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 12, 2013, Plaintiff Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 27, 2013, Plaintiff Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 29, 2013, Plaintiff Heather Morgan, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 30, 2013, Plaintiff Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On September 9, 2013, Plaintiff Ahold USA, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On September 24, 2013, Plaintiff City of Providence, Rhode Island, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On October 2, 2013, Plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On October 7, 2013, Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On October 25, 2013, Plaintiff Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On March 13, 2014, Plaintiff Allied Services Division Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On March 19, 2014, Plaintiff NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On February 25, 2014, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered the pending actions transferred to the District of Massachusetts for coordinated pretrial proceedings, as In Re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation.

On March 26, 2015, Walgreen Co., The Kruger Co., Safeway Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., Albertson’s LLC, direct purchasers, filed a separate complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. On April 8, 2015, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ordered the action be transferred to the District of Massachusetts, to be coordinated or consolidated with the coordinated proceedings. The original complaint filed by the plaintiffs asserted claims only against defendant Medicis. On October 5, 2015, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting claims against Impax and the other generic defendants.

On April 16, 2015, Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp, direct purchasers, filed a separate complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. On May 1, 2015, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ordered the action be transferred to the District of Massachusetts, to be coordinated or consolidated with the coordinated proceedings. The original complaint filed by the plaintiffs asserted claims only against defendant Medicis. On October 5, 2015, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting claims against Impax and the other generic defendants.

On January 25, 2016, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a separate complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. On February 11, 2016, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ordered the action to be transferred to the District of Massachusetts to be coordinated or consolidated with the coordinated proceedings.

The consolidated amended complaints allege that Medicis engaged in anticompetitive schemes by, among other things, filing frivolous patent litigation lawsuits, submitting frivolous Citizen Petitions, and entering into anticompetitive settlement agreements with several generic manufacturers, including Impax, to delay generic competition of Solodyn® and in violation of state and federal antitrust laws. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and equitable relief, including disgorgement and restitution. On August 14, 2015, the District Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaints. On October 16, 2017, the Court certified the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ and End-Payor Plaintiffs’ classes. Trial began on March 12, 2018. During March 2018, Impax separately settled all claims with the direct purchaser plaintiff class, retailer plaintiffs and the end payor plaintiff class for a total settlement amount of $84.5 million prior to the Combination and the cases were dismissed.  The settlements with the class plaintiffs are subject to court approval. The settlement with the direct purchaser plaintiff class was preliminarily approved by the Court on March 12, 2018, and the settlement with the end payor plaintiff class was preliminarily approved by the Court on April 5, 2018. Both class settlements were granted final Court approval on July 18, 2018.

Opana ER® FTC Antitrust Suit

On February 25, 2014, Impax received a Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") from the FTC concerning its investigation into the drug Opana® ER and its generic equivalents. On March 30, 2016, the FTC filed a complaint against Impax, Endo, and others in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that Impax and Endo violated antitrust laws when they entered into a June 2010 co-promotion and development agreement and a June 2010 settlement agreement that resolved patent litigation in connection with the submission of Impax’s ANDA for generic original Opana® ER. In July 2016, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, and a motion to sever the claims regarding Opana® ER from claims with respect to a separate settlement agreement that was challenged by the FTC. On October 20, 2016, the Court granted the motion to sever, formally terminating the suit against Impax, with an order that the FTC re-file no later than November 3, 2016 and dismissed the motion to dismiss as moot. On October 25, 2016, the FTC filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. On January 19, 2017, the FTC filed a Part 3 Administrative complaint against Impax with similar allegations regarding Impax’s June 2010 settlement agreement with Endo that resolved patent litigation in connection with the submission of Impax’s ANDA for generic original Opana® ER. Impax filed its answer to the Administrative Complaint on February 7, 2017. Trial concluded on November 15, 2017. On May 11, 2018, the Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of Impax and dismissed the case in its entirety. The government has appealed this ruling to the five Federal Trade Commissioners, who will review the case de novo. Briefing on the appeal to the Federal Trade Commission will conclude on August 24, 2018. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.

Opana ER® Antitrust Class Actions

From June 2014 to April 2015, 14 complaints were filed as class actions on behalf of direct and end-payor (indirect) purchasers, as well as by certain direct purchasers, against the manufacturer of the brand drug Opana ER® and Impax.

On June 4, 2014, Plaintiff Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 4, 2014, Plaintiff Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated. On June 6, 2018, Plaintiff Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss its complaint with prejudice. The court granted that motion on June 11, 2018.

On June 6, 2014, Plaintiff Value Drug Company, a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of itself and others similarly situated. On June 26, 2014, this Plaintiff withdrew its complaint from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and on July 16, 2014, re-filed the same complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff Wisconsin Masons’ Health Care Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On July 17, 2014, Plaintiff Massachusetts Bricklayers, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On August 11, 2014, Plaintiff Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On September 19, 2014, Plaintiff Meijer Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On October 3, 2014, Plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 138 Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On November 17, 2014, Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On December 12, 2014, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered the pending actions transferred to the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated pretrial proceedings, as In Re Opana ER Antitrust Litigation.

On December 19, 2014, Plaintiff Kim Mahaffay, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. On January 27, 2015, the Defendants removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

On January 12, 2015, Plaintiff Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On March 26, 2015 Walgreen Co., The Kruger Co., Safeway Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., Albertson’s LLC, direct purchasers, filed a separate complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

On April 23, 2015, Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp, direct purchasers, filed a separate complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

In each case, the complaints allege that Endo engaged in an anticompetitive scheme by, among other things, entering into an anticompetitive settlement agreement with Impax to delay generic competition of Opana ER® and in violation of state and federal antitrust laws. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and equitable relief, including disgorgement and restitution. Consolidated amended complaints were filed on May 4, 2015 by direct purchaser plaintiffs and end-payor (indirect) purchaser plaintiffs.

On July 3, 2015, defendants filed motions to dismiss the consolidated amended complaints, as well as the complaints of the “Opt-Out Plaintiffs” (Walgreen Co., The Kruger Co., Safeway Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., Albertson’s LLC, Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.).

On February 1, 2016, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The parties agreed that CVS Pharmacy, Inc. would be bound by the Court’s ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Opt-Out Plaintiffs’ complaints.

On February 10, 2016, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the end-payor purchaser plaintiffs’ consolidated amended complaint, and denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ consolidated amended complaint. The end-payor purchaser plaintiffs filed a second consolidated amended complaint and Impax moved to dismiss certain state law claims. On August 11, 2016, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the end-payor purchaser plaintiffs’ second consolidated amended complaint. Impax has filed its answer.

On February 25, 2016, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the Opt-Out Plaintiffs’ complaints, with leave to amend. The Opt-Out Plaintiffs and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. have filed amended complaints and Impax has filed its answer.

Discovery is ongoing. No trial date has been scheduled.

Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Actavis, PLC, et. al.

In August 2015, a complaint was filed against Amneal in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York involving patent litigation settlement agreements between Amneal and Forest Laboratories. Amneal was one of a number of pharmaceutical companies named in the lawsuit. The settlement agreement at issue settled the patent litigation between Forest Laboratories and Amneal regarding Namenda© immediate release tablets. On September 13, 2016, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss with respect to the federal claims and stayed the state law claims pending against Amneal and the other generic pharmaceutical company defendants until the federal claims are resolved. The court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss with respect to the state law claims without prejudice to renew the motion after the federal claims have been resolved. The court cited the interests of judicial economy and the myriad state antitrust and unfair business practices laws as the basis for severing the state law claims and placing them on the court’s inactive docket. The court’s decision places the entirety of the claims pending against Amneal and the other generic pharmaceutical companies on the court’s inactive docket, which effectively stays the litigation as to Amneal until the federal claims are resolved or until the court removes those claims from its inactive docket.

United States Department of Justice Investigations

Previously on November 6, 2014, Impax disclosed that one of its sales representatives received a grand jury subpoena from the Antitrust Division of the United States Justice Department (the “Justice Department”). In connection with this same investigation, on March 13, 2015, Impax received a grand jury subpoena from the Justice Department requesting the production of information and documents regarding the sales, marketing, and pricing of certain generic prescription medications. In particular, the Justice Department’s investigation currently focuses on four generic medications: digoxin tablets, terbutaline sulfate tablets, prilocaine/lidocaine cream, and calcipotriene topical solution. The Company has been cooperating and intends to continue cooperating with the investigation. However, no assurance can be given as to the timing or outcome of the investigation.

On April 30, 2018, Impax received a CID from the Civil Division of the Justice Department (the “Civil Division”). The CID requests the production of information and documents regarding the pricing and sale of Impax’s pharmaceuticals and Impax’s interactions with other generic pharmaceutical manufacturers. According to the CID, the investigation concerns allegations that generic pharmaceutical manufacturers, including Impax, engaged in market allocation and price-fixing agreements, paid illegal remuneration, and caused false claims to be submitted to the Federal government. The Company has been cooperating and intends to continue cooperating with the Civil Division’s investigation. However, no assurance can be given as to the timing or outcome of the investigation.

Attorney General of the State of Connecticut Interrogatories and Subpoena Duces Tecum

On July 14, 2014, Impax received a subpoena and interrogatories (the “Subpoena”) from the State of Connecticut Attorney General (“Connecticut AG”) concerning its investigation into sales of Impax's generic product, digoxin. According to the Connecticut AG, the investigation is to determine whether anyone engaged in a contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce which has the effect of (i) fixing, controlling or maintaining prices or (ii) allocating or dividing customers or territories relating to the sale of digoxin in violation of Connecticut state antitrust law. The Company has produced documents and information in response to the Subpoena. To the knowledge of the Company, no proceedings by the Connecticut AG have been initiated against the Company at this time; however, no assurance can be given as to the timing or outcome of this investigation.

Texas State Attorney General Civil Investigative Demand

On May 27, 2014, a CID was served on Amneal by the Office of the Attorney General for the state of Texas (the “Texas AG”) relating to products distributed by Amneal under a specific Amneal labeler code. Shortly thereafter, Amneal received a second CID with respect to the same products sold by Interpharm Holding, Inc. (“Interpharm”), the assets of which had been acquired by Amneal in June 2008. Amneal completed its production of the direct and indirect sales transaction data in connection with the products at issue and provided this information to the Texas AG in November 2015. In May 2016, the Texas AG delivered two settlement demands to Amneal in connection with alleged overpayments made by the State of Texas for such products under its Medicaid programs. For the Amneal and Interpharm products at issue, the Texas AG’s initial demand was for an aggregate total of $36 million based on $16.2 million in alleged overpayments. After analyzing the Texas AG’s demand, Amneal raised certain questions regarding the methodology used in the Texas AG’s overpayment calculations, including the fact that the calculations treated all pharmacy claims after 2012 for the products at issue as claims for over-the-counter (“OTC”) drugs, even though the products were prescription pharmaceuticals. This had the effect of increasing the alleged overpayment because the dispensing fee for OTC drugs was lower than that for prescription drugs. Therefore, the Texas AG’s calculations were derived by subtracting a lower (and incorrect) OTC dispensing fee from the higher (and correct) prescription dispensing fee. The Texas AG later acknowledged this discrepancy and is in the process of re-calculating the alleged overpayment.

In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation

From March 2016 to April 2017, 22 complaints were filed as class actions on behalf of direct and indirect purchasers against manufacturers of generic digoxin and doxycycline and Impax alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain and/or stabilize prices of these generic products. From January 2017 to April 2017, three complaints were filed on behalf of indirect purchasers against manufacturers of generic lidocaine/prilocaine and Impax alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain and/or stabilize prices of these generic products.

On March 2, 2016, Plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers Local 30 Benefits Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on June 9, 2016.

On March 25, 2016, Plaintiff Tulsa Firefighters Health and Welfare Trust, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On March 25, 2016, Plaintiff NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On April 4, 2016, Plaintiff Pipe Trade Services MN, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On April 25, 2016, Plaintiff Edward Carpinelli, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On April 27, 2016, Plaintiff Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On May 2, 2016, Plaintiff Nina Diamond, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On May 5, 2016, Plaintiff UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On May 6, 2016, Plaintiff Minnesota Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On May 12, 2016, Plaintiff The City of Providence, Rhode Island, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On May 18, 2016, Plaintiff KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On May 19, 2016, Plaintiff Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 8, 2016, Plaintiff United Food & Commercial Workers and Employers Arizona Health and Welfare Trust, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 17, 2016, Plaintiff Ottis McCrary, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 20, 2016, Plaintiff Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 27, 2016, Plaintiff César Castillo, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On June 29, 2016, Plaintiff Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 33 Health and Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On July 1, 2016, Plaintiff Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On July 15, 2016, Plaintiff Ahold USA, Inc., a direct purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On September 7, 2016, Plaintiff United Here Health, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On September 20, 2016, Plaintiff Valerie Velardi, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

On January 13, 2017, Plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers Local 30 Benefits Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated against manufacturers of generic lidocaine/prilocaine and the Company alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain and/or stabilize prices of this generic drug.

On April 17, 2017, Plaintiff UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated against manufacturers of generic lidocaine/prilocaine and Impax alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain and/or stabilize prices of this generic drug.

On April 25, 2017, Plaintiff Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company, an indirect purchaser, filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of itself and others similarly situated against manufacturers of generic lidocaine/prilocaine and Impax alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain and/or stabilize prices of this generic drug.

On May 19, 2016, several indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a motion with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer and consolidate the actions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Judicial Panel ordered the actions consolidated in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and ordered that the actions be renamed “In re Generic Digoxin and Doxycycline Antitrust Litigation.

On January 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed two consolidated class action complaints.

On April 6, 2017, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered the consolidation of all civil actions involving allegations of antitrust conspiracies in the generic pharmaceutical industry regarding 18 generic drugs to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The consolidated actions have been renamed In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation. Consolidated class action complaints for each of the 18 drugs were filed on August 15, 2017. Direct purchaser plaintiffs, end-payer plaintiffs, and indirect reseller plaintiffs filed consolidated class complaints against Impax for two products, digoxin and lidocaine-prilocaine.

On October 6, 2017, Impax filed a motion to dismiss the digoxin complaint. Briefing on the motion to dismiss is complete and a decision is pending. On February 9, 2018, the Court issued an order denying the discovery stay and allowing certain fact discovery to proceed.

On January 19, 2018, Plaintiffs The Kroger Co., Albertsons Companies, LLC, and H.E. Butt Grocery Company L.P., opt-outs, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against 35 companies, including Impax, alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain and/or stabilize prices of 30 drugs and specifically digoxin and lidocaine/prilocaine with respect to Impax. No schedule has been set.

On June 22, 2018, Plaintiffs Ahold USA, Inc., César Castillo, Inc., FWK Holdings, L.L.C., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., and Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. filed a complaint on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against 23 companies, including Impax, and one individual, alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain, stabilize, and/or raise prices, rig bids, and allocate markets or customers for various drugs, specifically glyburide-metformin and metronidazole with respect to Impax. No schedule has been set.

On June 27, 2018, Plaintiffs Marion Diagnostic Center, LLC and Marion Healthcare, LLC filed a motion seeking leave to file a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against seven named defendants, alleging a horizontal and vertical distributor conspiracy to fix prices and allocate sales of lidocaine products. The Court has not ruled on the Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file the new complaint and no schedule has been set.

On August 3, 2018, Plaintiff Humana Inc. filed a complaint against 37 companies, including the Company, as the successor to Impax, alleging a conspiracy to fix, maintain, stabilize, and/or raise prices, rig bids, and allocate markets or customers for various drugs, specifically digoxin and lidocaine-prilocaine with respect to Impax. No schedule has been set.

Prescription Opioid Litigation

The Company or certain of its affiliates have been named as a defendant in various matters relating to the promotion and sale of prescription opioid pain relievers. The Company is aware that other individuals and states and political subdivisions are filing comparable actions against, among others, manufacturers and parties that have promoted and sold prescription opioid pain relievers, and additional suits may be filed.

The complaints, asserting claims under provisions of different state law and, in one case, Federal law, generally contend that the defendants allegedly engaged in improper marketing of opioids, and seek a variety of remedies, including restitution, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. None of the complaints specifies the exact amount of damages at issue. The Company and its affiliates that are defendants in the various lawsuits deny all allegations asserted in these complaints and have filed or intend to file motions to dismiss where possible. Each of the opioid-related matters described below is in its early stages. The Company is cooperating with the investigations relating to these matters, which are ongoing, and intends to continue to vigorously defend these cases. In light of those facts and the inherent uncertainties of civil litigation, the Company is not in a position to predict the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or provide an estimate of the amount or range of potential loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome in any of these matters.

On August 17, 2017, plaintiff Linda Hughes, as the mother of Nathan Hughes, decedent, filed her complaint in Missouri state court naming Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC, Impax, five other pharmaceutical company defendants, and three healthcare provider defendants. Plaintiff alleges that use of defendants’ opioid medications caused the death of her son, Nathan Hughes. In her original complaint, plaintiff requested damages against the defendants and certification of a class action. Plaintiff abandoned her request for a class action in her December 22, 2017, amended complaint. In her amended complaint, plaintiff alleges causes of action against Amneal and Impax for strict product liability, negligent product liability, violation of Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and fraudulent misrepresentation. The case was removed to federal court on September 18, 2017. It was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on February 2, 2018, and is part of the multidistrict litigation pending as In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804 (the “MDL”). Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand the case to Missouri state court. That motion remains pending before the MDL court. All activity in the case is stayed by order of the MDL court.

On March 15, 2018, plaintiff Scott Ellington, purporting to represent the State of Arkansas, more than sixty counties and a dozen cities, filed his complaint naming Gemini Laboratories, LLC and fifty-one other pharmaceutical companies as defendants. Plaintiffs allege that Gemini and the other pharmaceutical company defendants improperly marketed, sold, and distributed opioid medications and failed to adequately warn about the risks of those medications. The complaint also includes claims against distributors and retailers of opioid medications. Plaintiffs allege causes of actions against Gemini and the other pharmaceutical company defendants for negligence and nuisance and alleged violations of multiple Arkansas statutes. Plaintiffs request past damages and restitution for monies allegedly spent by the State of Arkansas and the county and city plaintiffs for “extraordinary and additional services” for responding to what plaintiffs term the “Arkansas Opioid Epidemic.” Plaintiffs also seek prospective damages to allow them to “comprehensively intervene in the Arkansas Opioid Epidemic,” punitive and treble damages as provided by law, and their costs and fees. Plaintiffs’ complaint does not include any specific damage amounts alleged by plaintiffs. Gemini has filed a general denial and, on June 28, 2018, it joined the other pharmaceutical company defendants in moving to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint.

On March 27, 2018, plaintiff American Resources Insurance Company, Inc. filed its complaint against Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Impax, the Impax Generics Division, and thirty-five other pharmaceutical company defendants. Plaintiff seeks certification of a class of insurers that since January 1, 2010, allegedly have been wrongfully required to: (i) reimburse for prescription opioids that allegedly were promoted, sold, and distributed illegally and improperly by the pharmaceutical company defendants; and (ii) incur costs for treatment of overdoses of opioid medications, misuse of those medications, or addiction to them. Plaintiff’s complaint also includes claims against distributors of opioid medications. Plaintiff alleges causes of action against Amneal, Impax and the other defendants for negligence, recklessness and gross negligence, unjust enrichment, subrogation, fraud, and violations of federal RICO statutes. Plaintiff demands compensatory and punitive damages, but plaintiff’s complaint does not include any allegation of specific damage amounts. On April 18, 2018, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation conditionally transferred the case to the MDL. Two defendants opposed transfer of the case, and there has not been a final determination whether the case will be transferred. On or about May 2, 2018, the case was transferred to the MDL. All activity in the case is stayed by order of the MDL court.
On May 30, 2018, plaintiff William J. Comstock filed his complaint against Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, and four other pharmaceutical company defendants. Plaintiff alleges he became addicted to opioid medications manufactured and sold by the pharmaceutical company defendants, which plaintiff contends caused him to experience opioid-induced psychosis, prolonged hospitalizations, pain, and suffering. Plaintiff asserts causes of action against Amneal and the other pharmaceutical company defendants for negligence, fraudulent misrepresentation, and violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. Plaintiff also asserts a claim for medical malpractice against defendant Nadia Toshani, M.D. On July 12, 2018, Amneal and other defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Currently, the case is the subject of a conditional order to transfer the case to the National Prescription Opiate Litigation Multidistrict Litigation pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. An opposition to the transfer was filed by defendants who are expected to be dismissed from the case.
On June 18, 2018, a Subpoena and CID issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Kentucky, Office of Consumer Protection was served on Amneal. The CID contains eleven requests for production of documents pertaining to opioid medications manufactured and/or sold by Amneal, or for which Amneal holds an Abbreviated New Drug Application. The Company is evaluating the CID and has been in communication with the Office of the Attorney General about the scope of the CID, the response to the CID, and the timing of the response. It is unknown if the Office of the Attorney General will pursue any claim or file a lawsuit against Amneal. The Attorney General has filed six lawsuits against manufacturers and distributors of opioid medications asserting that those companies engaged in improper marketing, sales and distribution of opioid medications and failed to adequately warn about the risks of opioid medications. In those lawsuits, the Attorney General has demanded injunctive relief, civil penalties, restitution, compensatory damages, treble damages, punitive damages, and awards of attorney’s fees. If the Attorney General files a lawsuit, the Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Company's investigation relative to the CID is ongoing and there is no case or claim to evaluate at this time. Accordingly, the Company is not in a position to predict the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or provide an estimate of the amount or range of potential loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome if the Attorney General files a lawsuit.

On July 9, 2018, the Muscogee (Creek) Nation filed a First Amended Complaint in its case pending in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation Multidistrict Litigation (The Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, MDL No. 2804 (In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation), Member Case No. 1:18-op-45459-DAP) against the Company and 55 other defendants consisting of pharmaceutical companies, wholesalers, distributors, and pharmacies. Plaintiff describes itself in the First Amended Complaint as a federally recognized Indian tribe with a membership of 83,570 citizens. Plaintiff alleges it exercises sovereign governmental authority over its citizens and within its territory, which it describes as covering 4,867 square miles within the state of Oklahoma. Plaintiff alleges it has been damaged by the Company and the other pharmaceutical company defendants alleged improper marketing, including off-label marketing, failure to adequately warn of the risks of opioid medications, and failure to properly monitor and control diversion of opioid medications within the Nation. The case has been designated as a bellwether motion to dismiss case for the MDL, meaning it is a test case for arguments directed at the complaints filed by Indian tribes in the MDL cases. It is not a bellwether or test case at this juncture for any other purpose. On July 23, 2018, the MDL Court issued the following scheduling order for briefing on the motion to dismiss: (i) motions to dismiss are due by August 31, 2018; (ii) plaintiff’s oppositions are due by October 1, 2018; (iii) amicus briefs (by other Indian tribes) are due by October 8, 2018; and (iv) defendants’ reply briefs are due by November 6, 2018, assuming amicus briefs are filed October 8 (defendants’ reply briefs are due no later than 28 days after the amicus briefs are filed).
On July 18, 2018, the County of Webb Texas requested waivers of service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and the MDL Court’s CMOs from Amneal and Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, in its case pending in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation Multidistrict Litigation (County of Webb, Texas v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, MDL No. 2804 (In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation), Member Case No. 1:18-op-45175-DAP). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint filed against Amneal and forty-one other defendants consisting of pharmaceutical companies, wholesalers, distributors, and pharmacy benefit managers, contains allegations that plaintiff is a county created under the authority of the State of Texas located in southern Texas with approximately 272,000 residents. Plaintiff alleges damages as a result of Amneal’s and the pharmaceutical company defendants’ improper marketing, failure to adequately warn of the risks of opioid medications, and failure to properly monitor and control diversion of opioid medications in or affecting Webb County. Plaintiff alleges causes of action against Amneal and other pharmaceutical company defendants for negligence, negligence per se, nuisance, gross negligence, fraud, civil conspiracy, violation of Texas consumer protection and deceptive trade practice acts (Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 17.41, et. seq.), unjust enrichment, and violations of federal RICO statutes. All activity in the case is stayed by order of the MDL court.
AWP Litigation

On December 30, 2015, Plumbers’ Local Union No. 690 Health Plan and others similarly situated filed a class action against several generic drug manufacturers, including Impax, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, First Judicial District of Pennsylvania, Civil Trial Division, alleging that Impax and others violated the law, including the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection law, by inflating the Average Wholesale Price (“AWP”) of certain generic drugs. The case has since been removed to federal court in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. By virtue of an amended complaint filed on March 29, 2016, the suit has been amended to comprise a nationwide class of third party payors that allegedly reimbursed or purchased certain generic drugs based on AWP and to assert causes of action under the laws of other states in addition to Pennsylvania. On May 17, 2016, this case was stayed. On January 18, 2017, Impax, along with the other defendants, filed a joint motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 15, 2017, the Court dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The time period to file an appeal has lapsed.

On February 5, 2016, Delaware Valley Health Care Coalition filed a lawsuit based on substantially similar allegations in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, First Judicial District of Pennsylvania, Civil Trial Division that seeks declaratory judgment. On May 20, 2016, this case was stayed pending resolution of the federal court action described above.

Impax Laboratories, LLC. v. Turing Pharmaceuticals AG

On May 2, 2016, Impax filed suit against Turing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging breach of the terms of the contract by which Turing purchased from Impax the right to sell the drug Daraprim®, as well as the right to sell certain Daraprim® inventory (the “Purchase Agreement”). Specifically, Impax seeks (i) a declaratory judgment that Impax may revoke Turing’s right to sell Daraprim® under Impax's labeler code and national drug codes; (ii) specific performance to require Turing to comply with its obligations under the Purchase Agreement for past due reports and for reports going forward; and (iii) money damages to remedy Turing’s failure to reimburse Impax for chargebacks and Medicaid rebate liability when due, currently in excess of $40.9 million and for future amounts that may be due. Turing has filed its answer and a counterclaim against Impax alleging breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Discovery is closed. On October 14, 2016, Impax filed a motion for summary judgment. The District Court issued its order on September 29, 2017. The Court found that Turing breached the Purchase Agreement by failing to reimburse Impax for Medicaid rebate liability, however, the Court also found that Impax breached the Purchase Agreement by not filing a restatement with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services at Turing’s request. Therefore, Impax was not entitled to damages. On October 13, 2017, Impax filed a Motion for Clarification/Reconsideration of the Summary Judgment Order. Briefing on the motion is complete and a decision is pending. On May 29, 2018, Impax filed a letter with the Court informing it of Impax’s submission of a restatement of its Average Manufacturer Price for Daraprim for the third quarter of fiscal year 2015 and the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015 and again requesting an order granting its Motion for Summary Judgment.

Telephone Consumer Protection Act Cases

On January 31, 2017, Plaintiff Family Medicine Pharmacy LLC filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama on behalf of itself and others similarly situated against Impax alleging violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, as amended by the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005 (the "Telephone Consumer Protection Act"). On March 27, 2017, Impax filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and plaintiff filed an amended complaint on April 10, 2017. On July 18, 2017, the parties reached an agreement in principle regarding the class settlement. On September 29, 2017, the District Court preliminarily approved the proposed class settlement. The Court held a hearing on March 6, 2018 and issued an order with final approval of the proposed class settlement.

On February 14, 2017, Plaintiff Medicine To Go Pharmacies, Inc. filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of itself and others similarly situated against Impax alleging violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. On April 17, 2017, Impax filed a motion to dismiss, transfer, or stay this case in light of the first-filed case described above. This case was transferred to the Southern District of Alabama. On September 15, 2017, the Court stayed this matter pending the final approval of the class settlement described above.

Securities Class Action

On April 17, 2017, Lead Plaintiff New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund filed an amended class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of itself and others similarly situated against Impax alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. Impax filed its motion to dismiss the amended complaint on June 1, 2017 and briefing has been completed.

Shareholder Derivative Action

On February 22, 2017, Plaintiff Ed Lippman filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the Superior Court for the State of California in the County of Alameda on behalf of Impax against former executives, a current executive, and certain current members of the board of directors alleging breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and corporate waste. This matter has been stayed pending the securities class action referenced above.

Securities Class Actions related to the Combination

On December 12, 2017 and December 14, 2017, Plaintiffs Susan Vana and David Stone, respectively, filed class action complaints in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Amneal and Impax alleging violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 generally alleging that the Registration Statement on Form S-4 related to the Combination contains false and misleading statements and/or omissions concerning the financial projections of Impax, Amneal, and the combined company; Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC’s valuation analyses and Fairness Opinions relating to Impax and Amneal; potential conflicts of interest associated with one of Impax’s financial advisors and the Combination with Amneal; and background information of the proposed business combination, including confidentiality agreements entered into by Impax in connection with the Combination. On April 4, 2018, plaintiffs filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order voluntarily dismissing the actions and on April 5, 2018, the court issued an order to dismiss the actions. Plaintiffs did not file any petition for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses by the court-ordered deadline of June 1, 2018.

Teva v. Impax Laboratories, LLC.

On February 15, 2017, Plaintiffs Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals Curacao N.V. (“Teva”) filed a Praecipe to Issue Writ of Summons and Writ of Summons (precursor to a complaint) in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas against Impax alleging that Impax breached the Strategic Alliance Agreement between the parties by not indemnifying Teva in its two litigations with GlaxoSmithKline LLC regarding Wellbutrin® XL. Impax filed a Motion to Disqualify Teva’s counsel related to the matter, and on August 23, 2017, the Court denied Impax's motion. Following the Court’s order, Teva filed its complaint. Impax filed an appeal regarding the disqualification order, and a decision is pending. The matter is currently stayed pending an appellate decision on the disqualification order.

California Wage and Hour Class Action

On August 3, 2017, Plaintiff Emielou Williams filed a class action complaint in the Superior Court for the State of California in the County of Alameda on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Impax alleging violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200 by violating various California wage and hour laws. On October 10, 2017, Impax filed a Demurrer and Motion to Strike Class Allegations. On December 12, 2017, the Court overruled Impax’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s individual claims, however, it struck all of Plaintiff’s class allegations. On March 13, 2018, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint once again including the same class allegations. The Company filed a Demurrer and Motion to Strike Class Allegations on April 12, 2018 and hearing is scheduled for August 24, 2018. Discovery is ongoing.
v3.10.0.1
Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Equity [Abstract]  
Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit
Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit

Members' Deficit Prior to the Combination
As of December 31, 2017, Amneal had 189 million units authorized, issued, and outstanding.

During 2018, the board of managers of Amneal approved a discretionary modification to the profit participation units be concurrent with the Combination that caused the vesting of all PPUs that were previously issued to certain current or former employees for service prior to the Combination. The modification entitled the holders to 6.9 million shares of Class A Common Stock with a fair value of $126.0 million on the date of the Combination and $32.8 million of cash. In July 2018, Holdings distributed the shares it received in the Redemption to settle the PPUs with no additional shares issued by the Company. Additionally, during 2018, Holdings distributed $27.7 million of cash bonuses to employees of Amneal for service prior to the Combination. As a result of these transactions, the Company recorded charges aggregating $186.5 million to acquisition, integration and transaction-related expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2018, and corresponding capital contributions of $158.8 million related to the vesting of the PPUs and $27.7 million related to the cash bonus in members' accumulated deficit. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, Amneal made distributions of $183.0 million to its members.

Pursuant to the BCA, Amneal's units prior to the Combination were canceled and the Amneal Common Units were distributed as discussed in further detail in the paragraph below.

Stockholders' Equity Subsequent to the Combination
Amended Certificate of Incorporation
In connection with the closing of the Combination, on May 4, 2018, the Company amended and restated its certificate of incorporation ("Charter") to, among other things, reflect the change of its name from Atlas Holdings, Inc. to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and provide for the authorization of (i) 900 million shares of Class A Common Stock with a par value of $0.01 per share; (ii) 300 million shares of Class B Common Stock with a par value of $0.01 per share; (iii) 18 million shares of Class B-1 Common Stock with a par value of $0.01 per share; and (iv.) 2 million shares of undesignated preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.

Voting Rights
Holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share of stock held.
Except as required by law and except in connection with the election of the Class B-1 director, holders of Class B-1 Common Stock are not entitled to vote on any matter. Holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote together as a single class on each matter submitted to a stockholder vote. Holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are not entitled to vote on any amendment to the Company's Charter that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of preferred stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote on such terms pursuant to the Company's Charter or law.

Dividend Rights
The holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B-1 Common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, payable in cash, property, or securities of the Company, as may be declared by the Company's board of directors, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends, subject to any preferential or other rights of the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock. The holders of Class B Common stock will not be entitled to receive any dividends.

Participation Rights
Under the Company's Charter, the holders of Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock and Class B-1 Common Stock have no participation rights. However, the Company's Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated as of December 31, 2017 (the "Stockholders Agreement") provides that if the Company proposes to issue any securities, other than in certain issuances, Holdings will have the right to purchase its pro rata share of such securities, based on the number of shares of common stock owned by Holdings before such issuance.

Issuance and Restrictions on Company Common Stock
Pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Amneal dated May 4, 2018 (the "Limited Liability Company Agreement"), Amneal will issue to the Company an additional Amneal common unit for each additional share of Class A Common Stock issued by the Company. Additionally, pursuant to the Charter, shares of Class B Common Stock will be issued to Holdings and its permitted transferees only to the extent necessary in certain circumstances to maintain a one-to-one ratio between the number of Amneal Common Units and the number of shares of Class B Common Stock held by such members. Shares of Class B Common Stock are transferable only for no consideration to the Company for automatic retirement or in accordance with the Stockholders Agreement and the Limited Liability Company Agreement.

Liquidation Rights
On the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B-1 Common Stock are entitled to share equally in all assets of the Company available for distribution among the stockholders of the Company after payment to all creditors and subject to any preferential or other rights of the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock. The holders of Class B Common stock are not entitled to share in such net assets.

Redemption
The Limited Liability Company Agreement provides that holders of Amneal Common Units may, from time to time, require the Company to redeem all or a portion of their interests for newly-issued shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B-1 Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. Upon receipt of a redemption request, the Company may, instead, elect to effect an exchange of Amneal Units directly with the holder. Additionally, the Company may elect to settle any such redemption or exchange in shares of Class A Common stock, Class B-1 Common Stock or in cash. In the event of a cash settlement, the Company would issue new shares of Class A Common Stock and use the proceeds from the sale of these newly-issued shares of Class A Common Stock to fund the cash settlement, which, in effect, limits the amount of the cash payments to the redeeming member. In connection with any redemption, the Company will receive a corresponding number of Amneal Units, increasing the Company's total ownership interest in Amneal. Additionally, an equivalent number of shares of Class B Common Stock will be surrendered and canceled.

Preferred Stock
Under the Charter, the Company's Board of Directors has the authority to issue preferred stock and set its rights and preferences. As of June 30, 2018, no preferred stock has been issued.

Common Stock Issued
In connection with the Combination, the Company issued 73.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock to the holders of Impax Common Stock and 225 million shares of Class B Common Stock to Holdings. In connection with the PIPE, Holdings redeemed 46.8 million shares of Class B Common Stock and an equal number of Amneal units for 34.5 million shares of unregistered Class A Common Stock and 12.3 million shares of unregistered Class B-1 Common Stock. In connection with the Redemption, Holdings redeemed an additional 6.9 million shares of Class B Common Stock and an equal number of Amneal Units for 6.9 million shares of Series A Common Stock for distribution to members of Holdings whom were previously issued PPUs. No cash was received by the Company with respect to issuances of common stock. The Combination, the PIPE and the Redemption are more fully described in Note 1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation.

Non-Controlling Interests
As discussed in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company consolidates the financial statements of Amneal and its subsidiaries and records non-controlling interests for the portion of Amneal’s economic interests that is not held by the Company. Non-controlling interests are adjusted for capital transactions that impact Holdings' economic interest in Amneal.

Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest
During July 2018, a non-controlling interest holder in one of Amneal's non-public subsidiaries notified the Company of its intent to redeem its remaining ownership interest for $11.9 million based on the contractual terms of an agreement. The Company recorded charges to stockholders' accumulated deficit and non-controlling interests of $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2018, to accrete the redeemable non-controlling interest to contract value at June 30, 2018. While the charge to stockholders' accumulated deficit did not impact net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, it did result in an increase in the net loss applicable to the Company during those periods. As of June 30, 2018, $11.9 million has been reclassified to redeemable non-controlling interest.
v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]  
Share-Based Compensation
Share-Based Compensation
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2018 Incentive Award Plan

In May 2018, the Company adopted the Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2018 Incentive Award Plan ("2018 Plan") under which the Company may grant stock options and other equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors providing services to the Company and its subsidiaries.

The aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the Company's 2018 Plan is 23 million shares. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had 18,288,353 shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan.

Exchanged Impax Options

As a result of the acquisition of Impax, on May 4, 2018, each Impax stock option outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Combination became fully vested and exchanged for a fully vested and exercisable option to purchase an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company with the same exercise price per share as the replaced options and otherwise subject to the same terms and conditions as the replaced options. Consequently, at the Closing, the Company issued 3 million fully vested stock options in exchange for the outstanding Impax options.

The Company recognizes the grant date fair value of each option and share of restricted stock unit over its vesting period. Stock options and restricted stock unit awards are granted under the Company’s 2018 Plan and generally vest over a four year period and, in the case of stock options, have a term of 10 years.

The following table summarizes all of the Company's stock option activity for the current year through June 30, 2018:

Stock Options
Number of
Shares
Under Option
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 
$

Conversion of Impax stock options outstanding on May 4, 2018
3,002,669

 
18.90

Options granted
3,391,199

 
16.48

Options exercised
(163,857
)
 
12.06

Options forfeited
(201,800
)
 
27.54

Outstanding at June 30, 2018
6,028,211

 
$
17.43

Options exercisable at June 30, 2018
2,637,012

 
$
18.66



As of June 30, 2018, stock options outstanding and exercisable had average remaining contractual lives of 7.4 years and 4.5 years, respectively. Also, as of June 30, 2018, stock options outstanding and exercisable each had aggregate intrinsic values of $10.7 million and $7.4 million, respectively, and restricted stock units outstanding had an aggregate intrinsic value of $21.7 million.

The Company grants restricted stock units to certain eligible employees as a component of its long-term incentive compensation program. The restricted stock unit award grants are made in accordance with the Company’s 2018 Plan and are subject to forfeiture if the vesting conditions are not met. A summary of the unvested restricted stock units is as follows:
Restricted Stock Units
Number of
Restricted
Stock Units
 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2017

 
$

     Granted
1,320,448

 
17.06

     Vested

 

     Forfeited

 

Non-vested at June 30, 2018
1,320,448

 
$
17.06



As of June 30, 2018, the Company had total unrecognized share-based compensation expense of $48.2 million related to all of its share-based awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.9 years. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $1.2 million.

The Company estimated the fair value of each stock option award on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, wherein expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the publicly traded common stock of a peer group of companies. The expected term calculation is based on the “simplified” method described in SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment, and SAB No. 110, Share-Based Payment, as the result of the simplified method provides a reasonable estimate in comparison to actual experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield at the date of grant for an instrument with a maturity that is commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock, and has no present intention to pay cash dividends. Options granted under each of the above plans generally vest over four years and have a term of 10 years. The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the 2018 Plan.
 
June 30, 2018
Volatility
46.5%
Risk-free interest rate
2.9%
Dividend yield
—%
Weighted-average expected life (years)
6.25
Weighted average grant date fair value
$8.06


The amount of share-based compensation expense recognized by the Company is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Cost of revenues
$
115

 
$

 
$
115

 
$

Selling, general and administrative
1,423

 

 
1,423

 

Research and development
106

 

 
106

 

Total
$
1,644

 
$

 
$
1,644

 
$

v3.10.0.1
Related-Party Transactions
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]  
Related-Party Transactions
Related-Party Transactions

The Company has various business agreements with certain third-party companies in which there is some common ownership and/or management between those entities, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand. The Company has no direct ownership or management in any of such related party companies. The related party relationships that generated income and or expense and in the respective reporting period are described below.

Kanan, LLC

Kanan, LLC ("Kanan") is an independent real estate company which owns Amneal’s manufacturing facilities located at 65 Readington Road, Branchburg, New Jersey, 131 Chambers Brook Road, Branchburg, New Jersey and 1 New England Avenue, Piscataway, New Jersey. Amneal leases these facilities from Kanan under two separate triple-net lease agreements that expire in 2027 and 2031, respectively, at an annual rental cost of approximately $2.0 million combined, subject to CPI rent escalation adjustments as provided in the lease agreements. Rent expense paid to the related party for both of the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.5 million. Rent expense paid to the related party for both of the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $1.0 million.

AE Companies, LLC

AE Companies, LLC (“AE LLC”) is an independent company which provides certain shared services and corporate type functions to a number of independent entities with respect to which, from time to time, Amneal conducts business. Amneal has ongoing professional service agreements with AE LLC for administrative and research and development services. The total amount of expense incurred from these agreements for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.1 million (none in 2018). The total amount of income earned from these agreements for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.2 million (none in 2018).

Industrial Real Estate Holdings NY, LLC

Industrial Real Estate Holdings NY, LLC (“IRE”) is an independent real estate management entity which, among other activities, is the landlord of Amneal’s leased manufacturing facilities located at 75 and 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, New York. The lease at 85 Adams Avenue expired in March 2017 while the lease for 75 Adams Avenue expires in March 2021. Rent expense paid to the related party for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Rent expense paid to the related party for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC

Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Kashiv”) is an independent contract development organization focused primarily on the development of 505(b) (2) NDA products. Amneal has various business agreements with Kashiv. In May 2013, Amneal entered into a sublease agreement with Kashiv for a portion of one of its research and development facilities. The sublease automatically renews annually if not terminated and has an annual base rent of $1.8 million. Rental income from the related-party sublease for the three months ending June 30, 2017 was $0.1 million (none in 2018). Rental income from the related-party sublease for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. On January 15, 2018, Amneal and Kashiv entered into an Assignment and Assumption of Lease Agreement. The lease was assigned to Kashiv, and Amneal was relieved of all obligations. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $0.6 million and $10.4 million of receivables were due, respectively.

Amneal has also entered into various development and commercialization arrangements with Kashiv to collaborate on the development and commercialization of certain generic pharmaceutical products. Kashiv receives a percentage of net profits with respect to Amneal’s sales of these products. The total profit share paid to Kashiv for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $1.6 million and $5.3 million, respectively. The total profit share paid to Kashiv for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $2.0 million and $9.3 million, respectively. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 payables of $1.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, were due to the related party for royalty-related transactions.

In June 2017, Amneal and Kashiv entered a product acquisition and royalty stream purchase agreement. The aggregate purchase price was $25 million on the closing, which has been paid, plus two potential future $5 million earn outs related to the Estradiol Product. The contingent earn outs will be recorded in the period in which they are earned. The first and second $5 million earn outs were recognized in March 2018 and June 2018, respectively, as an increase to the cost of the Estradiol product intangible asset and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the Estradiol intangible asset. As of June 30, 2018, the $10 million was due to Kashiv and recorded in related party payables.

Pursuant to a product development agreement, Amneal and Kashiv agreed to collaborate on the development and commercialization of Oxycodone HCI ER Oral Tablets. Under the agreement, this product is owned by Kashiv, with Amneal acting as the exclusive marketing partner and as Kashiv’s agent for filing the product ANDA. Under the agreement, Amneal was also responsible for assuming control of and managing all aspects of the patent litigation arising from the filing of the ANDA, including selecting counsel and settling such proceeding (subject to Kashiv’s consent). In December 2017, Amneal and Kashiv terminated the product development agreement and pursuant to the termination and settlement of the agreement, Kashiv agreed to pay Amneal $7.8 million, an amount equal to the legal costs incurred by Amneal related to the defense of the ANDA. The $7.8 million settlement was recorded within general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 and related-party receivables as of December 31, 2017. The cash payment was received in February 2018.

Adello Biologics, LLC

Adello is an independent clinical stage company engaged in the development of biosimilar pharmaceutical products. Amneal and Adello are parties to a master services agreement pursuant to which, from time to time, Amneal provides human resources and product quality assurance services on behalf of Adello. The parties are also party to a license agreement for parking spaces in Piscataway, NJ. The total amount of net expense paid to Adello from these agreements for both of the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was less than $0.1 million. The total amount of net expense paid to Adello from these agreements for both of the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was less than $0.1 million.

In March 2017, Amneal entered into a product development agreement with Adello. The collaboration extended the remaining development process to Adello for a complex generic product, while Amneal retained its commercial rights upon approval. Pursuant to the agreement, Adello paid Amneal $10 million for reimbursement of past development costs, which Amneal deferred as a liability and will pay royalties upon commercialization.

In October 2017, Amneal and Adello terminated their product development agreement pursuant to which Amneal and Adello had been collaborating to develop and commercialize Glatiramer Acetate products. Pursuant to the termination agreement, Amneal owed Adello $10.5 million for the up-front payment plus interest. This amount was paid in January 2018 and recognized as a related-party payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017.

On October 1, 2017, Amneal and Adello entered into a license and commercialization agreement pursuant to which the parties have agreed to cooperate with respect to certain development activities in connection with two biologic pharmaceutical products. In addition, under the agreement, Adello has appointed Amneal as its exclusive marketing partner for such products in the United States. In connection with the agreement, Amneal paid an upfront amount of $1.5 million in October 2017 which was recorded within research and development expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The agreement also provides for potential future milestone payments to Adello.

In October 2017, Amneal purchased a building from Adello in Ireland to further support its inhalation dosage form. Amneal issued a promissory note for 12.5 million euros ($14.7 million based on exchange rate as of December 31, 2017) which accrues interest at a rate of 2% per annum, due on or before July 1, 2019. As of June 30, 2018, no amounts were due under the promissory note.

PharmaSophia, LLC

PharmaSophia, LLC (“PharmaSophia”) is a joint venture formed by Nava Pharma, LLC (“Nava”) and Oakwood Laboratories, LLC for the purpose of developing certain products. Currently PharmaSophia is actively developing two injectable products. PharmaSophia and Nava are parties to a research and development agreement pursuant to which Nava provides research and development services to PharmaSophia. Nava subcontracted this obligation to Amneal, entering into a subcontract research and development services agreement pursuant to which Amneal provides research and development services to Nava in connection with the products being developed by PharmaSophia. The total amount of income earned from these agreements for both of the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.1 million. The total amount of income earned from these agreements for both of the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0.2 million. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 receivables of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were due from the related party.

Gemini Laboratories, LLC

Prior to the Company's acquisition of Gemini in May 2018 as described in Note 3. Acquisitions, Gemini was an independent specialty pharmaceuticals company focused on promoting niche branded products to endocrinologists, pediatricians, OB/GYNs and other specialist physicians. Gemini also engaged in the wholesale distribution of generic pharmaceuticals to compounding pharmacies and to directly dispensing physicians, and promoted and distributed certain branded or quasi-branded products. Gemini predominantly sold products through branded wholesalers and certain compounding pharmacies and partners that service directly dispensing physicians. Prior to the Company's acquisition of Gemini, Amneal and Gemini were parties to various agreements. Total gross profit earned from the sale of inventory to Gemini for the three months ended June 30, 2018 (through the acquisition date) and 2017 was nil and $0.3 million, respectively. Total gross profit earned from the sale of inventory to Gemini for the six months ended June 30, 2018 (through the acquisition date) and 2017 was $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The total profit share paid by Gemini for the three months ended June 30, 2018 (through the acquisition date) and 2017 was $0.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The total profit share paid by Gemini for the six months ended June 30, 2018 (through the acquisition date) and 2017 was $4.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017, receivables of $5.6 million were due from the related party.

APHC Holdings, LLC (formerly, Amneal Holdings, LLC)

APHC Holdings, LLC (formerly, Amneal Holdings, LLC) was the ultimate parent of Amneal. In connection with the Combination, Amneal is required to reimburse transaction-related costs incurred by APHC Holdings. As of June 30, 2018, no amounts were due to APHC Holdings.
v3.10.0.1
Employee Benefit Plans
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Retirement Benefits [Abstract]  
Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has voluntary defined contribution plans covering eligible employees in the United States which provide for a Company match. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company made matching contributions of $1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company made matching contributions of $4.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

The Company also has a deferred compensation plan for certain former executives of Impax. Deferred compensation liabilities are recorded at the value of the amount owed to the plan participants, with changes in value recognized as compensation expense. The calculation of the deferred compensation plan obligation is derived by reference to hypothetical investments selected by the participants and is included in other long-term liabilities. The Company invests participant contributions in corporate-owned life insurance policies, for which the cash surrender value is included in other non-current assets. Matching contributions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were immaterial.
v3.10.0.1
Segment Information
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Segment Reporting [Abstract]  
Segment Information
Segment Information

The Company has two reportable segments, the Generics business and the Specialty Pharma business. The Generics business develops, manufactures and commercializes complex oral solids, injectables, ophthalmics, liquids, topicals, softgels, inhalation products and transdermals across a broad range of therapeutic categories. The Company's retail and institutional portfolio contains approximately 200 product families, many of which represent difficult-to-manufacture products or products that have a high barrier-to-entry such as oncologics, anti-infectives and supportive care to healthcare providers.

The Specialty Pharma business delivers proprietary medicines to the U.S. market. The Company offers a growing portfolio in core therapeutic categories including central nervous system disorders, endocrinology, parasitic infections and other therapeutic areas. Our specialty products are marketed through skilled specialty sales and marketing teams, who call on neurologists, movement disorder specialists, endocrinologists and primary care physicians in key markets throughout the U.S.

The Specialty Pharma business also has a number of product candidates that are in varying stages of development.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates the financial performance of the Company’s segments based upon segment operating (loss) income. Items below income (loss) from operations are not reported by segment, since they are excluded from the measure of segment profitability reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. Additionally, general and administrative expenses, certain selling expenses, certain litigation settlements, and non-operating income and expenses are included in “Corporate and Other.” The Company does not report balance sheet information by segment since it is not reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker.

The tables below present segment information reconciled to total Company financial results, with segment operating income or loss including gross profit less direct research and development expenses and direct selling expenses as well as any litigation settlements, to the extent specifically identified by segment (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
361,770

 
$
52,017

 
$

 
$
413,787

Cost of goods sold
211,534

 
23,958

 

 
235,492

Gross profit
150,236

 
28,059

 

 
178,295

Selling, general and administrative
16,621

 
13,549

 
22,833

 
53,003

Research and development
47,206

 
3,129

 

 
50,335

Intellectual property legal development expenses
4,004

 
43

 

 
4,047

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses
114,622

 

 
92,885

 
207,507

Restructuring expenses
24,797

 
2,421

 
17,247

 
44,465

Operating (loss) income
$
(57,014
)
 
$
8,917

 
$
(132,965
)
 
$
(181,062
)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
636,959

 
$
52,017

 
$

 
$
688,976

Cost of goods sold
342,128

 
23,958

 

 
366,086

Gross profit
294,831

 
28,059

 

 
322,890

Selling, general and administrative
27,824

 
13,549

 
36,751

 
78,124

Research and development
91,415

 
3,129

 

 
94,544

Intellectual property legal development expenses
8,580

 
43

 

 
8,623

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses
114,622

 

 
100,020

 
214,642

Restructuring expenses
24,797

 
2,421

 
17,247

 
44,465

Operating income (loss)
$
27,593

 
$
8,917

 
$
(154,018
)
 
$
(117,508
)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
259,871

 
$

 
$

 
$
259,871

Cost of goods sold
136,138

 

 

 
136,138

Gross profit
123,733

 

 

 
123,733

Selling, general and administrative
14,845

 

 
12,093

 
26,938

Research and development
47,184

 

 

 
47,184

Intellectual property legal development expenses
4,926

 

 

 
4,926

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses

 

 
82

 
82

Operating income (loss)
$
56,778

 
$

 
$
(12,175
)
 
$
44,603


Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
485,552

 
$

 
$

 
$
485,552

Cost of goods sold
245,803

 

 

 
245,803

Gross profit
239,749

 

 

 
239,749

Selling, general and administrative
29,808

 

 
24,832

 
54,640

Research and development
86,603

 

 

 
86,603

Intellectual property legal development expenses
11,093

 

 

 
11,093

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses

 

 
82

 
82

Operating income (loss)
$
112,245

 
$

 
$
(24,914
)
 
$
87,331



Significant Products
The Company generally consolidates net revenue by "product family," meaning that it consolidates net revenue from products containing the same active ingredient(s) irrespective of dosage strength, delivery method or packaging size. The Company's significant product families, as determined based on net revenue, and their percentage of the Company's consolidated net revenue for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are set forth below (in thousands, except for percents):

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
31,820

8
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
30,827

7
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
27,919

7
%
Specialty Pharma
 
Rytary® family
 
$
20,520

5
%
Generics
 
Epinephrine Auto-Injector family (generic Adrenaclick®)
 
$
19,166

5
%

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
40,387

16
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
22,643

9
%
Generics
 
Ranitidine
 
$
8,678

3
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
8,742

3
%
Generics
 
Atovaquone
 
$
7,234

3
%

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
52,096

8
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
50,094

7
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
44,941

7
%
Generics
 
Oseltamivir
 
$
39,634

6
%
Specialty Pharma
 
Rytary® family
 
$
20,520

3
%

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
70,777

15
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
42,120

9
%
Generics
 
Ranitidine
 
$
16,498

3
%
Generics
 
Lidocaine
 
$
15,878

3
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
15,594

3
%
v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Principles of Consolidation
Principles of Consolidation

Although the Company has a minority economic interest in Amneal, it is Amneal’s sole managing member, having the sole voting power to make all of Amneal’s business decisions and control its management. Therefore, the Company consolidates the financial statements of Amneal and its subsidiaries. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are a continuation of Amneal’s financial statements, with adjustments to equity to reflect the Combination, the PIPE and non-controlling interests for the portion of Amneal’s economic interests that is not held by the Company. Prior to the closing of the Combination and PIPE, the Company did not conduct any activities other than those incidental to the formation of it and Merger Sub and the matters contemplated by the BCA and had no operations and no material assets or liabilities.
Use of Estimates
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported financial position at the date of the financial statements and the reported results of operations during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The following are some, but not all, of such estimates: the determination of chargebacks, sales returns, rebates, bill backs, allowances for accounts receivable, accrued liabilities, valuation of inventory balances, the determination of useful lives for product rights and the assessment of expected cash flows used in evaluating goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers and associated ASUs (collectively "Topic 606"), which sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific sections of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed.

When assessing its revenue recognition, the Company performs the following five steps in accordance with Topic 606: (i) identify the contract with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligation. The Company recognizes revenue when it transfers control of its products to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those products. For further details on the Company’s revenue recognition policies under Topic 606, refer to Note 4. Revenue Recognition.

Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation consists of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) awarded to employees and non-employee directors. Stock options are measured at their fair value on the grant date or date of modification, as applicable. RSUs are measured at the stock price on the grant date or date of modification, as applicable. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service and/or performance period, as applicable. Forfeitures of awards are accounted for as a reduction in stock-based compensation expense in the period such awards are forfeited. The Company's policy is to issue new shares upon option exercises and RSUs vesting.
Foreign Currencies
Foreign Currencies

The Company has operations in the U.S., Switzerland, India, the U.K., Ireland, and other international jurisdictions. The results of its non-U.S. dollar based operations are translated to U.S. Dollars at the average exchange rates during the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the balance sheet date. Investment accounts are translated at historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments are accumulated in a separate component of stockholders’/ members’ deficit in the consolidated balance sheet and are included in the determination of comprehensive income. Transaction gains and losses are included in the determination of net income in the Company consolidated statements of operations as a component of foreign exchange gains and losses. Such foreign currency transaction gains and losses include fluctuations related to long term intercompany loans that are payable in the foreseeable future.
Business Combinations
Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method, the acquiring entity in a business combination records the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition at their fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related costs, primarily professional fees, are expensed as incurred.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. A portion of the Company’s cash flows are derived outside the U.S. As a result, the Company is subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company maintains cash balances at both U.S. based and foreign based commercial banks. At various times during the year, cash balances in the U.S. may exceed amounts that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, the Company had restricted cash balances of $7.1 million and $3.8 million in its bank accounts primarily related to the purchase of certain land and equipment
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is management’s best estimate of the amount of probable collection losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Management determines the allowance based on historical experience along with the present knowledge of potentially uncollectible accounts. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management believes it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to customers.
Inventories
Inventories

Inventories consist of finished goods held for sale, raw materials, and work in process. Inventories are stated at net realizable value, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. Adjustments for excess and obsolete inventories are established based upon historical experience and management’s assessment of current product demand. These assessments include inventory obsolescence based on its expiration date, damaged or rejected product, and slow-moving products.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows:
Asset Classification
 
Estimated Useful Life
Buildings
 
30 years
Computer equipment
 
5 years
Furniture and fixtures
 
7 years
Leasehold improvements
 
Shorter of asset's useful life or remaining life of lease
Machinery and equipment
 
7 years
Vehicles
 
5 years


Upon retirement or disposal, the cost of the asset disposed and the accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is reflected as part of operating income in the period of disposal. Expenditures that significantly increase value or extend useful lives of property, plant, and equipment are capitalized, whereas those for normal maintenance and repairs are expensed. The Company capitalizes interest on borrowings during the construction period of major capital projects as part of the related asset and amortizes the capitalized interest into earnings over the related asset’s remaining useful life.

In Process Research and Development
In-Process Research and Development

The fair value of in-process research and development ("IPR&D") acquired in a business combination is determined based on the present value of each research project’s projected cash flows using an income approach. Revenues are estimated based on relevant market size and growth factors, expected industry trends, individual project life cycles and the life of each research project’s underlying marketability. In determining the fair value of each research project, expected cash flows are adjusted for certain risks of completion, including technical and regulatory risk.

The value attributable to IPR&D projects at the time of acquisition is capitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset and tested for impairment until the project is completed or abandoned. Upon completion of the project, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is then accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset and amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. If the project is abandoned, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is charged to expense.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives including IPR&D are tested for impairment if impairment indicators arise and, at a minimum, annually. However, an entity is permitted to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test consists of a one-step analysis that compares the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company considers many factors in evaluating whether the value of its intangible assets with indefinite lives may not be recoverable, including, but not limited to, expected growth rates, the cost of equity and debt capital, general economic conditions, the Company's outlook and market performance of the Company's industry and recent and forecasted financial performance.

Goodwill
Goodwill

Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, is carried at cost. Goodwill is not amortized; rather, it is subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. The Company reviews goodwill for possible impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The impairment model prescribes a two-step method for determining goodwill impairment. However, an entity is permitted to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the two-step goodwill impairment test is necessary. The qualitative factors considered by the Company may include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, the Company’s outlook, market performance of the Company’s industry and recent and forecasted financial performance. Further testing is only required if the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. In the first step, the Company determines the fair value of its reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the net book value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company then performs the second step of the impairment test, which requires allocation of the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities using the acquisition method prescribed under authoritative guidance for business combinations with any residual fair value being allocated to goodwill. An impairment charge is recognized when the implied fair value of the Company’s reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount.

Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation of impairment may affect the carrying value of long-lived assets, which could result in impairment charges in future periods. Such assumptions include projections of future cash flows and the current fair value of the asset.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (Including Intangible Assets with Finite Lives)
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (Including Intangible Assets with Finite Lives)

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company evaluates assets for potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted net cash flows to the carrying amount of the asset. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and fair value which is generally an expected present value cash flow technique. Management’s policy in determining whether an impairment indicator exists comprises measurable operating performance criteria as well as other qualitative measures.

Intangible assets, other than indefinite-lived intangible assets, are amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset based on the pattern in which the economic benefits are expected to be consumed or otherwise used up or, if that pattern is not readily determinable, on a straight-line basis. The useful life is the period over which the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. Intangible assets are not written-off in the period of acquisition unless they become impaired during that period.

The Company regularly evaluates the remaining useful life of each intangible asset that is being amortized to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. If the estimate of the intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life.

Income Taxes
Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires the recognition of tax benefits or expenses on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of its assets and liabilities by applying the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Such net tax effects on temporary differences are reflected on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when the Company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

ASC 740-10 prescribes a two-step approach for the recognition and measurement of tax benefits associated with the positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. The Company has reviewed and will continue to review the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions, which may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on ongoing analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. To the extent that the Company’s assessment of the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions changes as a result of the evaluation of new information, such change in estimate will be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. The Company reports income tax-related interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions, if applicable, as a component of income tax expense.

Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes net income and all changes in equity for cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the consolidation of foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements.
Research and Development/Intellectual Property Legal Development Expense
Research and Development

Research and development ("R&D") activities are expensed as incurred. Primarily R&D costs consist of direct and allocated expenses incurred with the process of formulation, clinical research, and validation associated with new product development. Upfront and milestone payments made to third parties in connection with R&D collaborations are expensed as incurred up to the point of regulatory approval or when there is no alternative future use. Payments made to third parties subsequent to regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the respective intangible asset. Amounts capitalized for such payments are included in intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization.

Intellectual Property Legal Development Expenses

The Company expenses external intellectual property legal development expenses as incurred. These costs relate to legal challenges of innovator’s patents for invalidity or non-infringement, which are customary in the generic pharmaceutical industry, and are incurred predominately during development of a product and prior to regulatory approval. Associated costs include, but are not limited to, formulation assessments, patent challenge opinions and strategy, and litigation expenses to defend the intellectual property supporting the Company' regulatory filings.
Shipping Costs
Shipping Costs

The Company records the costs of shipping product to its customers as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses as incurred.
Recent Adopted/Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The guidance will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), to clarify how entities should present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The guidance requires entities to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows.

As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The guidance should be applied retrospectively and is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company early adopted ASU 2016-18 on January 1, 2018. This guidance was applied retrospectively and, accordingly, prior period amounts have been revised.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, that will require companies to account for the income tax effects of intercompany transfers of assets other than inventory (e.g., intangible assets) when the transfer occurs. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period (i.e., early adoption is permitted only in the first interim period). The Company early adopted ASU 2016-16 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have an effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), to clarify how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The guidance will be applied retrospectively and is effective for the Company for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Subsequent to the issuance of Topic 606, the FASB clarified the guidance through several Accounting Standard Updates. This guidance represents a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which that company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. This update sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed.

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and associated ASU's (collectively "Topic 606"), using the modified retrospective method, applied to all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. This method requires the cumulative effect of the adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption.

The Company recorded a $5.0 million reduction to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adoption Topic 606. There is an acceleration of revenue for certain product sale arrangements which are designed to include profit share payments upon the customer’s sell-through of certain products purchased from the Company. Previously under Topic 605, the Company deferred revenue until its customers sold the product through to their end customers, at which point the Company considered the profit share payments to be earned and collection reasonably assured. Under Topic 606, an estimate of the profit share payments is included in the transaction price as variable consideration and is recognized at the time the Company transfers control of the product to its customer. This change resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment upon adoption of the ASU as of January 1, 2018 which was not material to the financial statements. In the second quarter of 2018, the Company made a correction to the cumulative impact adjustment as of January 1, 2018 by reducing accumulated deficit by $1.7 million. The Company does not believe that this adjustment is material to its financial statements and it had no impact on any prior periods. Refer to Note 4. Revenue Recognition for additional disclosures required by Topic 606.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment that eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value (i.e., measure the charge based on today’s Step 1). The standard will be applied prospectively and is effective for the Company’s annual and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, guidance that changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost and require entities to record allowances for available-for-sale debt securities rather than reduce the carrying amount, as they do today under the other-than-temporary impairment model. It also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The guidance is effective for the Company for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Valuation Allowance
A rollforward of the major categories of sales-related deductions for the six months ended June 30, 2018 is as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Contract Charge-backs and Sales Volume Allowances
 
Cash Discount Allowances
 
Accrued Returns Allowance
 
Accrued Medicaid and Commercial Rebates
January 1, 2018
 
$
453,703

 
$
20,408

 
$
45,175

 
$
12,911

Liabilities assumed from acquisitions

221,561


11,781


91,704


49,743

Provision related to sales recorded in the period
 
1,401,440

 
47,607

 
24,717

 
33,546

Credits issued during the period
 
(1,360,391
)
 
(49,495
)
 
(25,163
)
 
(26,002
)
Balance at June 30, 2018
 
$
716,313

 
$
30,301

 
$
136,433

 
$
70,198

Property, Plant, and Equipment
Depreciation expense is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows:
Asset Classification
 
Estimated Useful Life
Buildings
 
30 years
Computer equipment
 
5 years
Furniture and fixtures
 
7 years
Leasehold improvements
 
Shorter of asset's useful life or remaining life of lease
Machinery and equipment
 
7 years
Vehicles
 
5 years
Property, plant, and equipment is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Land
$
22,859

 
$
5,275

Buildings
234,756

 
227,864

Leasehold improvements
93,254

 
70,354

Machinery and equipment
305,899

 
260,637

Furniture and fixtures
10,713

 
18,415

Vehicles
1,511

 
1,517

Computer equipment
29,876

 
26,831

Construction-in-progress
49,920

 
32,235

Total property, plant, and equipment
748,788

 
643,128

    Less: Accumulated depreciation
(179,460
)
 
(156,370
)
           Property, plant, and equipment, net
$
569,328

 
$
486,758


Depreciation recognized and interest capitalized and included in property, plant, and equipment by the Company is as follows:
 
Three Months
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Depreciation
$
15,453

 
$
9,650

 
$
28,443

 
$
19,363

v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
Schedule of Purchase Price, Net of Cash Acquired
The purchase price, net of cash acquired, is calculated as follows (in thousands, except share amount and price per share):

Fully diluted Impax share number (1)
 
73,288,792

Closing quoted market price of an Impax common share on May 4, 2018
 
$
18.30

Equity consideration - subtotal
 
$
1,341,185

Add: Fair value of Impax stock options as of May 4, 2018 (2)
 
22,610

Total equity consideration
 
1,363,795

Add: Extinguishment of certain Impax obligations, including accrued and unpaid interest
 
320,290

Less: Cash acquired
 
(37,907
)
Purchase price, net of cash acquired
 
$
1,646,178

(1) Represents shares of Impax Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Combination
 
 
(2) Represents the fair value of 3.0 million fully vested Impax stock options valued using the Black-Scholes options pricing model.
 
 
Schedule of Purchase Price Allocation
The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price allocation for the Gemini acquisition (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
As of June 30, 2018
Trade accounts receivable, net
 
$
8,158

Inventories
 
1,851

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
3,713

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
11

Goodwill
 
2,527

Intangible assets
 
142,740

Other
 
465

   Total assets acquired
 
159,465

 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
1,764

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
15,189

License liability
 
20,000

   Total liabilities assumed
 
36,953

Net assets acquired
 
$
122,512

The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price allocation for the Impax acquisition (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
As of June 30, 2018
Trade accounts receivable, net
 
$
206,749

Inventories
 
182,546

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
91,415

Property, plant and equipment
 
87,472

Goodwill
 
358,813

Intangible assets
 
1,606,642

Other
 
57,084

   Total assets acquired
 
2,590,721

Accounts payable
 
47,912

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
262,838

Long-term debt
 
600,000

Other long-term liabilities
 
33,793

   Total liabilities assumed
 
944,543

Net assets acquired
 
$
1,646,178

Schedule of Acquired Intangible Assets
The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
 
Weighted Average Useful Life (Years)
Marketed product rights
 
$
1,063,040

 
12.9
The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Preliminary Fair Values
 
Weighted Average Useful Life
Product rights for licensed / developed technology
 
$
110,350

 
10 years
Product rights for developed technologies
 
5,500

 
9 years
Product rights for out-licensed generics royalty agreement
 
390

 
2 years
 
 
$
116,240

 
 
Schedule of Business Acquisition Pro Forma Data
The unaudited pro forma combined results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (assuming the closing of the Combination occurred on January 1, 2017) are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
2017
 
2018
2017
Net revenue
 
$
447,524

$
461,953

 
$
865,068

$
872,037

Net loss
 
$
(86,621
)
$
(4,197
)
 
$
(161,050
)
$
(340,311
)
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 
$
(19,759
)
$
(1,957
)
 
$
(28,454
)
$
(141,691
)
v3.10.0.1
Restructuring and Other Charges (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]  
Restructuring and Related Costs
The Company recorded charges for restructuring as follows (in thousands):


Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2018

2017

2018

2017
Employee separation charges
$
44,465


$


$
44,465


$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The charges related to restructuring impacted segment earnings as follows (in thousands):


Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Generic
24,797

 
$

 
24,797

 
$

Specialty
2,421

 

 
2,421

 

Corporate
17,247

 

 
17,247

 

   Total restructuring charges
$
44,465

 
$

 
$
44,465

 
$

Schedule of Restructuring Reserve
The following table shows the change in the employee separation-related liability associated with the Company's restructuring programs (in thousands):


Employee Separation
Balance at December 31, 2017
$

Liabilities assumed in Impax acquisition
2,199

Charges to income
44,465

Payments
(6,353
)
Balance at June 30, 2018
$
40,311

v3.10.0.1
Acquisition, Transaction-Related and Integration Expenses (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
Schedule of Acquisition, Transaction-Related and Integration Expenses
The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.


Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2018

2017

2018
 
2017
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses 1
$
21,008


$
82


$
28,143


$
82

Profit Participation Units 2
158,757




158,757



Transaction-related bonus 3
27,742




27,742



Total
$
207,507


$
82


$
214,642


$
82


1 Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses include professional service fees (e.g. legal, investment banking and accounting), information technology systems conversions, and contract termination/ renegotiation costs.
2 Profit Participation Units expense relates to the accelerated vesting of certain of Amneal's profit participation units that occurred prior to the Closing of the Combination for current and former employees of Amneal for service prior to the Combination (see additional information in the paragraph below and Note 18. Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit).
3 Transaction-related bonus is a cash bonus that was funded by Holdings for employees of Amneal for service prior to the closing of the Combination (see additional information in Note 18., Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit).
v3.10.0.1
Earnings per Share (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]  
Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted
Basic and diluted net loss per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$
(19,104
)
 

 
$
(19,104
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A and Class B-1 basic and diluted
127,112

 

 
127,112

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss per share attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A and Class B-1 basic and diluted
$
(0.15
)
 
 
 
$
(0.15
)
 
 
v3.10.0.1
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Receivables [Abstract]  
Schedule of Trade Accounts Receivable, Net
Trade accounts receivable, net is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Gross accounts receivable
$
1,375,570

 
$
827,302

Allowance for doubtful accounts
(2,465
)
 
(1,824
)
Contract charge-backs and sales volume allowances
(716,313
)
 
(453,703
)
Cash discount allowances
(30,301
)
 
(20,408
)
Subtotal
(749,079
)
 
(475,935
)
Trade accounts receivable, net
$
626,491

 
$
351,367

v3.10.0.1
Inventories (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]  
Schedule of Inventory, Current
Inventories, net of reserves, are comprised of the following (in thousands):


June 30, 2018

December 31, 2017
Raw materials
$
202,760


$
140,051

Work in process
59,156


38,146

Finished goods
250,563


105,841

Inventories
$
512,479


$
284,038

Schedule of Inventory, Noncurrent
Inventories, net of reserves, are comprised of the following (in thousands):


June 30, 2018

December 31, 2017
Raw materials
$
202,760


$
140,051

Work in process
59,156


38,146

Finished goods
250,563


105,841

Inventories
$
512,479


$
284,038

v3.10.0.1
Property, Plant, and Equipment (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]  
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Depreciation expense is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows:
Asset Classification
 
Estimated Useful Life
Buildings
 
30 years
Computer equipment
 
5 years
Furniture and fixtures
 
7 years
Leasehold improvements
 
Shorter of asset's useful life or remaining life of lease
Machinery and equipment
 
7 years
Vehicles
 
5 years
Property, plant, and equipment is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Land
$
22,859

 
$
5,275

Buildings
234,756

 
227,864

Leasehold improvements
93,254

 
70,354

Machinery and equipment
305,899

 
260,637

Furniture and fixtures
10,713

 
18,415

Vehicles
1,511

 
1,517

Computer equipment
29,876

 
26,831

Construction-in-progress
49,920

 
32,235

Total property, plant, and equipment
748,788

 
643,128

    Less: Accumulated depreciation
(179,460
)
 
(156,370
)
           Property, plant, and equipment, net
$
569,328

 
$
486,758


Depreciation recognized and interest capitalized and included in property, plant, and equipment by the Company is as follows:
 
Three Months
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Depreciation
$
15,453

 
$
9,650

 
$
28,443

 
$
19,363

v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Schedule of Goodwill
The changes in goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017 were are follows (in thousands):


For the six months ended June 30, 2018
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
Balance, beginning of period
$
26,444

 
$
28,441

Goodwill acquired during the period
361,340

 

Goodwill divested during the period

 
(3,895
)
Currency translation
(1,309
)
 
1,898

Balance, end of period
$
386,475

 
$
26,444

Schedule of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Intangible assets at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Amortizing intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product rights
12.4
 
$
1,239,401

 
$
(34,765
)
 
$
1,204,636

 
$
49,700

 
$
(17,210
)
 
$
32,490

Customer relationships
14.9
 
7,264

 
(1,846
)
 
5,418

 
7,421

 
(1,072
)
 
6,349

Marketing authorizations
6.8
 
3,075

 
(118
)
 
2,957

 
76

 
(43
)
 
33

Licenses
11.5
 
3,000

 
(700
)
 
2,300

 
3,000

 
(600
)
 
2,400

Trade names
14.9
 
2,641

 
(671
)
 
1,970

 
2,699

 
(522
)
 
2,177

Total

 
$
1,255,381

 
$
(38,100
)
 
$
1,217,281

 
$
62,896

 
$
(19,447
)
 
$
43,449

In-process research and development

 
571,252

 

 
571,252

 
1,150

 

 
1,150

Total intangible assets
 
 
$
1,826,633

 
$
(38,100
)
 
$
1,788,533

 
$
64,046

 
$
(19,447
)
 
$
44,599

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Intangible assets at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Amortizing intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product rights
12.4
 
$
1,239,401

 
$
(34,765
)
 
$
1,204,636

 
$
49,700

 
$
(17,210
)
 
$
32,490

Customer relationships
14.9
 
7,264

 
(1,846
)
 
5,418

 
7,421

 
(1,072
)
 
6,349

Marketing authorizations
6.8
 
3,075

 
(118
)
 
2,957

 
76

 
(43
)
 
33

Licenses
11.5
 
3,000

 
(700
)
 
2,300

 
3,000

 
(600
)
 
2,400

Trade names
14.9
 
2,641

 
(671
)
 
1,970

 
2,699

 
(522
)
 
2,177

Total

 
$
1,255,381

 
$
(38,100
)
 
$
1,217,281

 
$
62,896

 
$
(19,447
)
 
$
43,449

In-process research and development

 
571,252

 

 
571,252

 
1,150

 

 
1,150

Total intangible assets
 
 
$
1,826,633

 
$
(38,100
)
 
$
1,788,533

 
$
64,046

 
$
(19,447
)
 
$
44,599

Finite-lived Intangible Assets Amortization Expense
Amortization expense related to intangible assets recognized is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,

2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Amortization
$
16,694

 
$
886

 
$
18,454

 
$
1,773

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Future Amortization Expense
The following table presents future amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter, excluding $571.3 million of in-process research and development intangible assets (in thousands).
 
 
Future Amortization
Remainder of 2018
 
$
52,829

2019
 
115,988

2020
 
128,101

2021
 
144,423

2022
 
147,528

2023
 
125,845

Thereafter
 
502,567

Total
 
$
1,217,281

v3.10.0.1
Other Accounts (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Schedule of Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Deposits and advances
$
2,310

 
$
1,851

Prepaid insurance
8,993

 
3,154

Prepaid regulatory fees
1,621

 
5,926

Income tax receivable
68,334

 

Other current receivables
19,429

 
15,150

Other prepaid assets
38,909

 
16,315

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
$
139,596

 
$
42,396

Schedule of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):


June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 Accounts payable
$
169,046

 
$
70,013

 Accrued returns allowance
136,433

 
45,175

 Accrued compensation
85,663

 
23,954

 Accrued Medicaid and commercial rebates
70,198

 
12,911

 Accrued royalties
20,628

 
2,970

 Estimated Teva and Allergan chargebacks and rebates 1
13,277

 

 Medicaid reimbursement accrual
15,000

 
15,000

 Accrued professional fees
10,213

 
938

 Accrued other
35,176

 
23,818

Total accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
555,634

 
$
194,779



1In connection with Impax's August 2016 acquisition of certain assets from Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. ("Teva") and Allergan plc ("Allergan"), Impax agreed to manage the payment process for certain commercial chargebacks and rebates on behalf of Teva and Allergan related to products each of Teva and Allergan sold into the channel prior to Impax's acquisition of the products. On August 18, 2016, Impax received a payment totaling $42.4 million from Teva and Allergan, which represented their combined estimate of the amount of commercial chargebacks and rebates to be paid by Impax on their behalf to wholesalers who purchased products from Teva and Allergan prior to the closing. Pursuant to the agreed upon transition services, Teva and Allergan are obligated to reimburse Impax for additional payments related to chargebacks and rebates for products they sold into the channel prior to the closing and made on their behalf in excess of the $42.4 million. If the total payments made by Impax on behalf of Teva and Allergan are less than $42.4 million, Impax is obligated to refund the difference to Teva and/or Allergan. As of June 30, 2018, $13.3 million remained in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
v3.10.0.1
Debt (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]  
Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments
The following is a summary of the Company's total indebtedness (in thousands):


June 30, 2018

December 31, 2017
Senior Credit Facility – Term Loan due May 2025
$
2,699,376


$

Other
624



Senior Credit Facility – Term Loan


1,378,160

Senior Credit Facility – Revolver


75,000

Total debt
2,700,000


1,453,160

Less: debt issuance costs
(37,268
)

(8,715)

Total debt, net of debt issuance costs
2,662,732


1,444,445

Less: current portion of Senior Credit Facility – Revolver


75,000

Less: current portion of long-term debt
21,427


14,171

Total long-term debt, net
$
2,641,305


$
1,355,274

Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Payments for Capital Leases
The monthly payments required under the terms of the non-cancelable lease agreement over the next five years and thereafter as follows (in thousands):

 
  
Payments Due
Remainder of 2018
  
$
2,600

2019
  
5,200

2020
  
5,200

2021
  
5,200

2022
  
5,200

2023
 
5,200

Thereafter
  
101,400

Total
  
$
130,000

v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 (in thousands) (there were no material assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Based on
 
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Compensation Plan asset (1)
 
$
43,213

 
$

 
$
43,213

 
$

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities (1)
 
$
34,213

 
$

 
$
34,213

 
$


1The deferred compensation plan liabilities are non-current liabilities recorded at the value of the amount owed to the plan participants, with changes in value recognized as compensation expense. The calculation of the deferred compensation plan obligation is derived from observable market data by reference to hypothetical investments selected by the participants and is included in other long-term liabilities. The Company invests participant contributions in corporate-owned life insurance policies, for which the cash surrender value is included in other non-current assets.

v3.10.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Leases
The table below reflects the future minimum lease payments, including reasonably assured renewals, due under these non-cancelable leases as of June 30, 2018 (in thousands):
             
 
  
Operating Leases
Remainder of 2018
  
$
11,910

2019
  
25,338

2020
  
11,840

2021
  
10,537

2022
  
9,613

2023
 
9,278

Thereafter
  
26,529

Total
  
$
105,045

v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]  
Schedule of Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes all of the Company's stock option activity for the current year through June 30, 2018:

Stock Options
Number of
Shares
Under Option
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 
$

Conversion of Impax stock options outstanding on May 4, 2018
3,002,669

 
18.90

Options granted
3,391,199

 
16.48

Options exercised
(163,857
)
 
12.06

Options forfeited
(201,800
)
 
27.54

Outstanding at June 30, 2018
6,028,211

 
$
17.43

Options exercisable at June 30, 2018
2,637,012

 
$
18.66

Schedule of Nonvested Restricted Stock Units Activity
A summary of the unvested restricted stock units is as follows:
Restricted Stock Units
Number of
Restricted
Stock Units
 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2017

 
$

     Granted
1,320,448

 
17.06

     Vested

 

     Forfeited

 

Non-vested at June 30, 2018
1,320,448

 
$
17.06

Schedule of Weighted Average Assumptions Used in the Option Pricing Model
The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the 2018 Plan.
 
June 30, 2018
Volatility
46.5%
Risk-free interest rate
2.9%
Dividend yield
—%
Weighted-average expected life (years)
6.25
Weighted average grant date fair value
$8.06
Schedule of Employee Service Share-based Compensation
The amount of share-based compensation expense recognized by the Company is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Cost of revenues
$
115

 
$

 
$
115

 
$

Selling, general and administrative
1,423

 

 
1,423

 

Research and development
106

 

 
106

 

Total
$
1,644

 
$

 
$
1,644

 
$

v3.10.0.1
Segment Information (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Segment Reporting [Abstract]  
Schedule of Segment Reporting Information, by Segment
The tables below present segment information reconciled to total Company financial results, with segment operating income or loss including gross profit less direct research and development expenses and direct selling expenses as well as any litigation settlements, to the extent specifically identified by segment (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
361,770

 
$
52,017

 
$

 
$
413,787

Cost of goods sold
211,534

 
23,958

 

 
235,492

Gross profit
150,236

 
28,059

 

 
178,295

Selling, general and administrative
16,621

 
13,549

 
22,833

 
53,003

Research and development
47,206

 
3,129

 

 
50,335

Intellectual property legal development expenses
4,004

 
43

 

 
4,047

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses
114,622

 

 
92,885

 
207,507

Restructuring expenses
24,797

 
2,421

 
17,247

 
44,465

Operating (loss) income
$
(57,014
)
 
$
8,917

 
$
(132,965
)
 
$
(181,062
)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
636,959

 
$
52,017

 
$

 
$
688,976

Cost of goods sold
342,128

 
23,958

 

 
366,086

Gross profit
294,831

 
28,059

 

 
322,890

Selling, general and administrative
27,824

 
13,549

 
36,751

 
78,124

Research and development
91,415

 
3,129

 

 
94,544

Intellectual property legal development expenses
8,580

 
43

 

 
8,623

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses
114,622

 

 
100,020

 
214,642

Restructuring expenses
24,797

 
2,421

 
17,247

 
44,465

Operating income (loss)
$
27,593

 
$
8,917

 
$
(154,018
)
 
$
(117,508
)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
259,871

 
$

 
$

 
$
259,871

Cost of goods sold
136,138

 

 

 
136,138

Gross profit
123,733

 

 

 
123,733

Selling, general and administrative
14,845

 

 
12,093

 
26,938

Research and development
47,184

 

 

 
47,184

Intellectual property legal development expenses
4,926

 

 

 
4,926

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses

 

 
82

 
82

Operating income (loss)
$
56,778

 
$

 
$
(12,175
)
 
$
44,603


Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Generics
 
Specialty Pharma
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Total
Company
Net revenue
$
485,552

 
$

 
$

 
$
485,552

Cost of goods sold
245,803

 

 

 
245,803

Gross profit
239,749

 

 

 
239,749

Selling, general and administrative
29,808

 

 
24,832

 
54,640

Research and development
86,603

 

 

 
86,603

Intellectual property legal development expenses
11,093

 

 

 
11,093

Acquisition and transaction-related expenses

 

 
82

 
82

Operating income (loss)
$
112,245

 
$

 
$
(24,914
)
 
$
87,331

Schedules of Concentration of Risk
The Company's significant product families, as determined based on net revenue, and their percentage of the Company's consolidated net revenue for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are set forth below (in thousands, except for percents):

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
31,820

8
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
30,827

7
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
27,919

7
%
Specialty Pharma
 
Rytary® family
 
$
20,520

5
%
Generics
 
Epinephrine Auto-Injector family (generic Adrenaclick®)
 
$
19,166

5
%

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
40,387

16
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
22,643

9
%
Generics
 
Ranitidine
 
$
8,678

3
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
8,742

3
%
Generics
 
Atovaquone
 
$
7,234

3
%

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
52,096

8
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
50,094

7
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
44,941

7
%
Generics
 
Oseltamivir
 
$
39,634

6
%
Specialty Pharma
 
Rytary® family
 
$
20,520

3
%

Segment
 
Product Family
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
$
%
Generics
 
Yuvafem-Estradiol
 
$
70,777

15
%
Generics
 
Diclofenac Sodium Gel
 
$
42,120

9
%
Generics
 
Ranitidine
 
$
16,498

3
%
Generics
 
Lidocaine
 
$
15,878

3
%
Generics
 
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul
 
$
15,594

3
%
v3.10.0.1
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Millions
May 04, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Shares repurchased percentage 15.00%  
Common Class A    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) $ 0.01 $ 0.01
Stock conversion ratio 1  
Common Class B    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) $ 0.01 0.01
Common Class B-1    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) 0.01 $ 0.01
Impax Laboratories, LLC    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) $ 0.01  
PIPE Investors    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Shareholder ownership percentage 15.00%  
Private Placement    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Sale of stock price per share (in dollars per share) $ 18.25  
Gross proceeds from stock issuance $ 855.0  
Private Placement | Common Class A    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 34,500,000  
Private Placement | Common Class B-1    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 12,300,000  
PPU Holders Distribution | Common Class A    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 6,886,140  
Amneal    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Ownership percentage by noncontrolling owners 57.00%  
Amneal | Private Placement And PPU Holders Distribution    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Decrease in noncontrolling ownership interest percentage 18.00%  
Impax Acquisition | Impax Common Stock Holders    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Shareholder ownership percentage 25.00%  
Impax Acquisition | Amneal Holdings, LLC    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Shareholder ownership percentage 75.00%  
Impax Acquisition | Amneal    
Class of Stock [Line Items]    
Ownership percentage by parent 25.00%  
Ownership percentage by noncontrolling owners 75.00%  
v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Allowance (Details)
$ in Thousands
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Contract Charge-backs and Sales Volume Allowances  
SEC Schedule, 12-09, Movement in Valuation Allowances and Reserves [Roll Forward]  
January 1, 2018 $ 453,703
Liabilities assumed from acquisitions 221,561
Provision related to sales recorded in the period 1,401,440
Credits issued during the period (1,360,391)
Balance at June 30, 2018 716,313
Cash Discount Allowances  
SEC Schedule, 12-09, Movement in Valuation Allowances and Reserves [Roll Forward]  
January 1, 2018 20,408
Liabilities assumed from acquisitions 11,781
Provision related to sales recorded in the period 47,607
Credits issued during the period (49,495)
Balance at June 30, 2018 30,301
Accrued Returns Allowance  
SEC Schedule, 12-09, Movement in Valuation Allowances and Reserves [Roll Forward]  
January 1, 2018 45,175
Liabilities assumed from acquisitions 91,704
Provision related to sales recorded in the period 24,717
Credits issued during the period (25,163)
Balance at June 30, 2018 136,433
Accrued Medicaid and Commercial Rebates  
SEC Schedule, 12-09, Movement in Valuation Allowances and Reserves [Roll Forward]  
January 1, 2018 12,911
Liabilities assumed from acquisitions 49,743
Provision related to sales recorded in the period 33,546
Credits issued during the period (26,002)
Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 70,198
v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Narrative (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Dec. 31, 2017
Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition [Line Items]          
Liabilities under tax receivable agreement $ 194,825   $ 194,825   $ 0
Cumulative-effective adjustment from adoption of ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606)         4,977
Cost of goods sold 235,492 $ 136,138 366,086 $ 245,803  
Restricted cash 7,069   7,069   3,756
Shipping          
Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition [Line Items]          
Cost of goods sold $ 4,600 1,500 $ 8,600 3,300  
Stockholders' Accumulated Deficit          
Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition [Line Items]          
Cumulative-effective adjustment from adoption of ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606)         4,977
Stockholders' Accumulated Deficit | Accounting Standards Update 2014-09          
Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition [Line Items]          
Cumulative-effective adjustment from adoption of ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606)   $ 1,700   $ 1,700 $ 5,000
v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Property, Plant and Equipment (Details)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Buildings  
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]  
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 30 years
Computer equipment  
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]  
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 5 years
Furniture and fixtures  
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]  
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 7 years
Machinery and equipment  
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]  
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 7 years
Vehicles  
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]  
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 5 years
v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions - Narrative (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
2 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
May 07, 2018
May 04, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses         $ 21,008 $ 82 $ 28,143 $ 82    
Goodwill     $ 386,475 $ 386,475 386,475   386,475   $ 26,444 $ 28,441
Total consideration, net of cash acquired             321,324 0    
Related-party payable, related to final working capital adjustment     14,875 14,875 14,875   14,875   $ 12,622  
Impax Acquisition                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses         16,400 $ 23,300 18,900 $ 26,000    
Measurement consideration transferred, fair value equity interest, percentage   25.00%                
Indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired   $ 543,600                
Goodwill     358,813 358,813 358,813   358,813      
Total consideration, net of cash acquired   1,646,178                
Cash acquired from acquisition   37,907                
Liabilities incurred   $ 320,290                
Revenue of acquiree since date of acquisition     118,300              
Income (loss) of acquiree since date of acquisition     (55,900)              
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses         400   400      
Percentage of voting interests acquired 98.00%                  
Indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired             26,500      
Goodwill     2,527 2,527 2,527   2,527      
Total consideration, net of cash acquired $ 119,500                  
Cash acquired from acquisition 3,900                  
Consideration paid in cash on hand 42,900                  
Working capital settlement 2,900                  
Related-party payable, related to final working capital adjustment     3,300 3,300 3,300   3,300      
Acquisition noncontrolling interest 3,000                  
Revenue of acquiree since date of acquisition       5,000            
Income (loss) of acquiree since date of acquisition       1,000            
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition | Notes Payable                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Liabilities incurred $ 77,200                  
Stated interest rate 3.00%                  
Specialty                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Goodwill     348,000 348,000 348,000   348,000      
Specialty | Impax Acquisition                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Goodwill     346,000 346,000 346,000   346,000      
Specialty | Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Goodwill     2,500 2,500 2,500   2,500      
Generic                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Goodwill     38,000 38,000 38,000   38,000      
Generic | Impax Acquisition                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Goodwill     $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000   $ 13,000      
Amneal Holdings, LLC | Impax Acquisition                    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]                    
Shareholder ownership percentage   75.00%                
v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions - Payments to Acquire Business (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
6 Months Ended
May 04, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Business Acquisition [Line Items]      
Purchase price, net of cash acquired   $ 321,324 $ 0
Impax Acquisition      
Business Acquisition [Line Items]      
Fully diluted Impax share number (in shares) 73,288,792    
Closing quoted market price of an Impax common share on May 4, 2018 $ 18.30    
Equity consideration - subtotal $ 1,341,185    
Add: Fair value of Impax stock options as of May 4, 2018 22,610    
Total equity consideration 1,363,795    
Add: Extinguishment of certain Impax obligations, including accrued and unpaid interest 320,290    
Less: Cash acquired (37,907)    
Purchase price, net of cash acquired $ 1,646,178    
Number of shares issued 3,000,000    
v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions - Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Business Combinations [Abstract]            
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses $ 21,008 $ 82 $ 28,143 $ 82    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]            
Goodwill 386,475   386,475   $ 26,444 $ 28,441
Impax Acquisition            
Business Combinations [Abstract]            
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses 16,400 $ 23,300 18,900 $ 26,000    
Business Acquisition [Line Items]            
Trade accounts receivable, net 206,749   206,749      
Inventories 182,546   182,546      
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 91,415   91,415      
Property, plant and equipment 87,472   87,472      
Goodwill 358,813   358,813      
Intangible assets 1,606,642   1,606,642      
Other 57,084   57,084      
Total assets acquired 2,590,721   2,590,721      
Accounts payable 47,912   47,912      
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 262,838   262,838      
Long-term debt 600,000   600,000      
Other long-term liabilities 33,793   33,793      
Total liabilities assumed 944,543   944,543      
Net assets acquired 1,646,178   1,646,178      
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition            
Business Combinations [Abstract]            
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses 400   400      
Business Acquisition [Line Items]            
Trade accounts receivable, net 8,158   8,158      
Inventories 1,851   1,851      
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 3,713   3,713      
Property, plant and equipment 11   11      
Goodwill 2,527   2,527      
Intangible assets 142,740   142,740      
Other 465   465      
Total assets acquired 159,465   159,465      
Accounts payable 1,764   1,764      
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 15,189   15,189      
Other long-term liabilities 20,000   20,000      
Total liabilities assumed 36,953   36,953      
Net assets acquired $ 122,512   $ 122,512      
v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions - Acquired Intangible Assets (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
6 Months Ended
May 04, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition    
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]    
Preliminary Fair Values   $ 116,240
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition | Licenses    
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]    
Preliminary Fair Values   $ 110,350
Weighted Average Useful Life   10 years
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition | Product rights for developed technologies    
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]    
Preliminary Fair Values   $ 5,500
Weighted Average Useful Life   9 years
Gemini Laboratories, LLC Acquisition | Product rights for out-licensed generics royalty agreement    
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]    
Preliminary Fair Values   $ 390
Weighted Average Useful Life   2 years
Impax Acquisition    
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]    
Preliminary Fair Values $ 1,063,040  
Weighted Average Useful Life 12 years 10 months 24 days  
v3.10.0.1
Acquisitions - Pro Forma (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Business Combinations [Abstract]        
Net revenue $ 447,524 $ 461,953 $ 865,068 $ 872,037
Net loss (86,621) (4,197) (161,050) (340,311)
Net loss attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $ (19,759) $ (1,957) $ (28,454) $ (141,691)
v3.10.0.1
Revenue Recognition (Details) - Customer Concentration Risk - Sales Revenue, Gross
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Three Largest Customers        
Concentration Risk [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage 82.00%   80.00%  
Four Largest Customers        
Concentration Risk [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage   79.00%   82.00%
v3.10.0.1
Alliance and Collaboration (Details)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
May 07, 2018
USD ($)
Oct. 01, 2017
USD ($)
product
Jun. 30, 2016
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Research and development       $ 50,335 $ 47,184 $ 94,544 $ 86,603
Cost of sales       235,492 $ 136,138 366,086 $ 245,803
Biosimilar Licensing and Supply Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount $ 71,800            
Research and development       500   500  
Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Number of products | product   2          
Collaborative arrangement term   10 years          
Collaborative arrangement up front payment   $ 1,500          
Collaborative arrangement profit share percentage   50.00%          
Astra Zeneca              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement reduced royalty     $ 30,000        
Royalty | Astra Zeneca              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Cost of sales       $ 1,000   $ 1,000  
Regulatory Approval | Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount   $ 21,000          
Successful Delivery of Commercial Launch Inventory | Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount   43,000          
Minimum | Number of Competitors for Launch of One Product | Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount   20,000          
Minimum | Achievement of Cumulative Net Sales | Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount   15,000          
Maximum | Number of Competitors for Launch of One Product | Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount   50,000          
Maximum | Achievement of Cumulative Net Sales | Adello Biologics, LLC License and Commercialization Agreement              
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]              
Collaborative arrangement maximum contingent payments amount   $ 67,500          
v3.10.0.1
Restructuring and Other Charges - Restructuring Charges (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses $ 44,465 $ 0 $ 44,465 $ 0
Employee separation charges        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses 44,465 0 44,465 0
Operating Segments | Generic        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses 24,797   24,797  
Operating Segments | Generic | Employee separation charges        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses 24,797 0 24,797 0
Operating Segments | Specialty        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses 2,421   2,421  
Operating Segments | Specialty | Employee separation charges        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses 2,421 0 2,421 0
Corporate        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses 17,247   17,247  
Corporate | Employee separation charges        
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]        
Restructuring expenses $ 17,247 $ 0 $ 17,247 $ 0
v3.10.0.1
Restructuring and Other Charges - Restructuring Rollforward (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]        
Charges to income $ 44,465 $ 0 $ 44,465 $ 0
Employee separation charges        
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]        
Balance at December 31, 2017     0  
Liabilities assumed in Impax acquisition     2,199  
Charges to income 44,465 $ 0 44,465 $ 0
Payments     (6,353)  
Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 40,311   $ 40,311  
v3.10.0.1
Restructuring and Other Charges - Narrative (Details)
$ in Millions
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Minimum  
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]  
Restructuring expected cost $ 50.0
Maximum  
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]  
Restructuring expected cost $ 60.0
v3.10.0.1
Acquisition, Transaction-Related and Integration Expenses (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
May 04, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Class of Stock [Line Items]          
Acquisition, transaction-related and integration expenses   $ 21,008 $ 82 $ 28,143 $ 82
Profit Participation Units   158,757 0 158,757 0
Transaction-related bonus   27,742 0 27,742 0
Total   $ 207,507 $ 82 $ 214,642 $ 82
Common Class A | PPU Holders Distribution          
Class of Stock [Line Items]          
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 6,886,140        
Accelerated vesting of profit participation units, fair value $ 126,000        
Accelerated vesting cash payment $ 32,800        
v3.10.0.1
Income taxes (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
May 04, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]            
Deferred tax asset, basis difference in investment, portion attributable to acquirer prior to business combination         $ 303,200  
Deferred tax asset, net operating loss, portion attributable to acquirer prior to business combination         $ 54,600  
Liabilities under tax receivable agreement $ 194,825   $ 194,825     $ 0
Income tax provision (benefit) $ (12,416) $ 1,852 $ (12,052) $ 2,855    
Effective tax rate, percent (4.70%) 4.70% (5.70%) 3.40%    
v3.10.0.1
Earnings per Share (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]        
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders, Basic $ (19,104) $ 0 $ (19,104) $ 0
Weighted average shares outstanding:        
Class A and Class B basic and diluted (in shares) 127,112,000 0 127,112,000 0
Net loss per share attributable to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s common stockholders:        
Class A and Class B basic and diluted (in dollars per share) $ (0.15)   $ (0.15)  
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share amount (in shares)     171,261  
v3.10.0.1
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net - Schedule of Trade Accounts Receivable, Net (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Receivables [Abstract]    
Gross accounts receivable $ 1,375,570 $ 827,302
Allowance for doubtful accounts (2,465) (1,824)
Contract charge-backs and sales volume allowances (716,313) (453,703)
Cash discount allowances (30,301) (20,408)
Subtotal (749,079) (475,935)
Trade accounts receivable, net $ 626,491 $ 351,367
v3.10.0.1
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net - Narrative (Details) - Customer Concentration Risk - Accounts Receivable
6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Customer A    
Concentration Risk [Line Items]    
Concentration risk percentage 31.00% 36.00%
Customer B    
Concentration Risk [Line Items]    
Concentration risk percentage 31.00% 27.00%
Customer C    
Concentration Risk [Line Items]    
Concentration risk percentage 25.00% 19.00%
v3.10.0.1
Inventories (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]    
Raw materials $ 202,760 $ 140,051
Work in process 59,156 38,146
Finished goods 250,563 105,841
Inventories $ 512,479 $ 284,038
v3.10.0.1
Property, Plant, and Equipment - Summary of Property, Plant, and Equipment (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment $ 748,788 $ 643,128
Less: Accumulated depreciation (179,460) (156,370)
Property, plant, and equipment, net 569,328 486,758
Land    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 22,859 5,275
Buildings    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 234,756 227,864
Leasehold improvements    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 93,254 70,354
Machinery and equipment    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 305,899 260,637
Furniture and fixtures    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 10,713 18,415
Vehicles    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 1,511 1,517
Computer equipment    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment 29,876 26,831
Construction-in-progress    
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]    
Total property, plant, and equipment $ 49,920 $ 32,235
v3.10.0.1
Property, Plant, and Equipment - Depreciation (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]        
Depreciation $ 15,453 $ 9,650 $ 28,443 $ 19,363
v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Schedule of Goodwill (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Goodwill [Roll Forward]    
Balance, beginning of period $ 26,444 $ 28,441
Goodwill acquired during the period 361,340 0
Goodwill divested during the period 0 (3,895)
Currency translation (1,309) 1,898
Balance, end of period $ 386,475 $ 26,444
v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Narrative (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill [Line Items]      
Goodwill $ 386,475 $ 26,444 $ 28,441
In-process research and development 571,252 $ 1,150  
Specialty      
Goodwill [Line Items]      
Goodwill 348,000    
Generic      
Goodwill [Line Items]      
Goodwill $ 38,000    
v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Intangible Assets (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net [Abstract]    
Cost $ 1,255,381 $ 62,896
Accumulated Amortization (38,100) (19,447)
Net 1,217,281 43,449
In-process research and development 571,252 1,150
Intangible assets, cost 1,826,633 64,046
Intangible assets, net $ 1,788,533 44,599
Product rights    
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net [Abstract]    
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 12 years 4 months 24 days  
Cost $ 1,239,401 49,700
Accumulated Amortization (34,765) (17,210)
Net $ 1,204,636 32,490
Customer relationships    
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net [Abstract]    
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 14 years 10 months 24 days  
Cost $ 7,264 7,421
Accumulated Amortization (1,846) (1,072)
Net $ 5,418 6,349
Marketing authorizations    
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net [Abstract]    
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 6 years 9 months 18 days  
Cost $ 3,075 76
Accumulated Amortization (118) (43)
Net $ 2,957 33
Licenses    
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net [Abstract]    
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 11 years 6 months  
Cost $ 3,000 3,000
Accumulated Amortization (700) (600)
Net $ 2,300 2,400
Trade names    
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net [Abstract]    
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 14 years 10 months 24 days  
Cost $ 2,641 2,699
Accumulated Amortization (671) (522)
Net $ 1,970 $ 2,177
v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Amortization Expense (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]        
Amortization $ 16,694 $ 886 $ 18,454 $ 1,773
v3.10.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Future Amortization Expense (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, Maturity Schedule [Abstract]    
Remainder of 2018 $ 52,829  
2019 115,988  
2020 128,101  
2021 144,423  
2022 147,528  
2023 125,845  
Thereafter 502,567  
Net $ 1,217,281 $ 43,449
v3.10.0.1
Other Accounts (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Aug. 18, 2016
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Prepaid Expense and Other Assets, Current [Abstract]      
Deposits and advances   $ 2,310 $ 1,851
Prepaid insurance   8,993 3,154
Prepaid regulatory fees   1,621 5,926
Income tax receivable   68,334 0
Other current receivables   19,429 15,150
Other prepaid assets   38,909 16,315
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets   139,596 42,396
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Current [Abstract]      
Accounts payable   169,046 70,013
Accrued returns allowance   136,433 45,175
Accrued compensation   85,663 23,954
Accrued Medicaid and commercial rebates   70,198 12,911
Accrued royalties   20,628 2,970
Estimated Teva and Allergan chargebacks and rebates 1   13,277 0
Medicaid reimbursement accrual   15,000 15,000
Accrued professional fees   10,213 938
Accrued other   35,176 23,818
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses   555,634 $ 194,779
Teva Transaction      
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Current [Abstract]      
Acquired balances $ 42,400    
Chargeback and reserve payments   $ 13,300  
v3.10.0.1
Debt - Summary of Long-term Debt (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Total debt $ 2,700,000 $ 1,453,160
Less: debt issuance costs (37,268) (8,715)
Total debt, net of debt issuance costs 2,662,732 1,444,445
Less: current portion of Senior Credit Facility – Revolver 0 75,000
Less: current portion of long-term debt 21,427 14,171
Long-term debt, net 2,641,305 1,355,274
Other    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Total debt 624 0
Revolver    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Total debt 0 75,000
Senior Credit Facility – Term Loan due May 2025 | Term Loan    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Total debt 2,699,376 0
Senior Credit Facility – Term Loan | Term Loan    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Total debt $ 0 $ 1,378,160
v3.10.0.1
Debt - Narrative (Details) - USD ($)
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 04, 2018
May 04, 2018
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Loss on extinguishment of debt     $ 19,667,000 $ 2,531,000 $ 19,667,000 $ 2,531,000
Amortization of debt issuance costs     1,400,000 $ 1,500,000 2,577,000 $ 2,463,000
Senior Secured Credit Facilities            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Repayments of principal in remainder of fiscal year     13,500,000   13,500,000  
Repayments of principal in year two     27,000,000   27,000,000  
Repayments of principal in year three     27,000,000   27,000,000  
Repayments of principal in year four     27,000,000   27,000,000  
Repayments of principal in year five     27,000,000   27,000,000  
Repayments of principal in year six     $ 27,000,000   $ 27,000,000  
Revolver | Senior Secured Credit Facilities            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Maximum borrowing capacity   $ 500,000,000.0        
Stated interest rate     1.50%   1.50%  
Outstanding borrowings on credit facility     $ 0   $ 0  
Commitment fee percentage on unused capacity         0.375%  
Debt issuance costs, gross   $ 4,600,000        
Revolver | Senior Secured Credit Facilities | Minimum            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Commitment fee percentage on unused capacity   0.25%        
Revolver | Senior Secured Credit Facilities | Maximum            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Commitment fee percentage on unused capacity   0.375%        
Term Loan | Senior Secured Credit Facilities            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Principal amount of debt   $ 2,700,000,000.0        
Quarterly installment rate   1.00%        
Debt issuance costs, gross   $ 38,100,000        
Term Loan | Senior Secured Credit Facilities | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Basis spread on variable rate         3.50%  
Term Loan | Senior Notes Due 2022            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Stated interest rate 2.00%          
Repayments of debt $ 599,400,000          
Letter of Credit | Revolver | Senior Secured Credit Facilities            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Maximum borrowing capacity   $ 25,000,000        
v3.10.0.1
Debt - Financing Obligation Narrative (Details)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
building
Dec. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]    
Number of buildings under financing obligation | building 2  
Financing obligation $ 39,500 $ 40,300
Current portion of financing obligations $ 251 $ 311
v3.10.0.1
Debt - Financing Obligation Payments (Details)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]  
Remainder of 2018 $ 2,600
2019 5,200
2020 5,200
2021 5,200
2022 5,200
2023 5,200
Thereafter 101,400
Total $ 130,000
v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Term Loan    
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]    
Long-term debt fair value $ 2,700,000 $ 1,390,000
Recurring    
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]    
Deferred Compensation Plan asset 43,213  
Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities 34,213  
Recurring | Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)    
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]    
Deferred Compensation Plan asset 0  
Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities 0  
Recurring | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)    
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]    
Deferred Compensation Plan asset 43,213  
Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities 34,213  
Recurring | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)    
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]    
Deferred Compensation Plan asset 0  
Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities $ 0  
v3.10.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies - Future minimum payments (Details)
$ in Thousands
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Remainder of 2018 $ 11,910
2019 25,338
2020 11,840
2021 10,537
2022 9,613
2023 9,278
Thereafter 26,529
Total $ 105,045
v3.10.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies - Narrative (Details)
$ in Millions
1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 4 Months Ended 6 Months Ended 11 Months Ended 14 Months Ended 31 Months Ended
Aug. 03, 2018
company
Jun. 27, 2018
defendent
Jun. 22, 2018
company
Jun. 18, 2018
request
lawsuit
Jan. 19, 2018
company
drug
Jan. 27, 2017
complaint
May 02, 2016
USD ($)
Mar. 31, 2018
USD ($)
May 31, 2016
USD ($)
settlement_demand
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Apr. 30, 2017
complaint
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Apr. 30, 2015
complaint
Apr. 30, 2017
complaint
Jan. 31, 2016
complaint
Dec. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Apr. 06, 2017
drug
Feb. 15, 2017
litigation
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Rent expense                   $ 4.3 $ 4.3   $ 5.1 $ 8.6            
Medicaid reimbursement reserve                   $ 15.0     $ 15.0         $ 15.0    
Solodyn                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of complaints | complaint                                 18      
Total settlement amount               $ 84.5                        
Opana ER                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of complaints | complaint                             14          
Texas State Attorney General Civil Investigative Demand                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of settlement demands | settlement_demand                 2                      
Damages sought, initial demand aggregate total                 $ 36.0                      
Alleged overpayments                 $ 16.2                      
Generic Drug Pricing Class Action                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of complaints | complaint                       3       22        
Generic Digoxin and Doxycycline Antitrust Litigation                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of complaints | complaint           2                            
Number of generic drugs included in consolidation of civil actions | drug                                     18  
Number of products included in consolidation of civil actions | drug                                     2  
Number of defendants | company         35                              
Number of drugs involved | drug         30                              
Glyburide-metformin And Metronidazole Litigation                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of defendants | company     23                                  
Lidocaine Products Litigation                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of defendants | defendent   7                                    
Opiod Medications Litigation                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of CID requests | request       11                                
Lawsuits filed against manufacturers and distributors | lawsuit       6                                
Impax Laboratories, Inc VS Turing Pharmaceuticals AG                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Damages sought, initial demand aggregate total             $ 40.9                          
Teva VS Impax Laboratories, Inc.                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of litigations | litigation                                       2
Subsequent Event | Digoxin And Lidocaine-prilocaine Litigation                                        
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                                        
Number of defendants | company 37                                      
v3.10.0.1
Stockholders' Equity/ Members' Deficit (Details)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
2 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
May 04, 2018
USD ($)
$ / shares
shares
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
vote
$ / shares
shares
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
vote
$ / shares
shares
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
vote
$ / shares
shares
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2017
USD ($)
shares
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Members' equity, units outstanding (in shares)             189,000,000
Members' equity, units authorized (in shares)             189,000,000
Members' equity, units issued (in shares)             189,000,000
Transaction-related bonus | $     $ 27,742 $ 0 $ 27,742 $ 0  
Profit share and transaction related bonus expense | $     186,500        
Profit share expense | $     $ 158,757 $ 0 158,757 0  
Distributions to members | $         $ 182,998 $ 295,265  
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in shares)   2,000,000 2,000,000   2,000,000    
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares   $ 0.01 $ 0.01   $ 0.01    
Preferred stock, shares issued (in shares)   0 0   0    
Redeemable non-controlling interest | $   $ 11,858 $ 11,858   $ 11,858   $ 0
Reclassification of redeemable non-controlling interest | $   $ 11,858          
Common Class A              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)   900,000,000 900,000,000   900,000,000    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.01   $ 0.01    
Number of votes per share | vote   1 1   1    
Common Class B              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)   300,000,000 300,000,000   300,000,000    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.01   $ 0.01    
Number of votes per share | vote   1 1   1    
Common Class B-1              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)   18,000,000 18,000,000   18,000,000    
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.01   $ 0.01    
Common Stock | Common Class A              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Effect of the Combination (in shares)   73,289,000          
Common Stock | Common Class B              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Effect of the Combination (in shares)   224,996,163          
Stockholders' Accumulated Deficit              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Reclassification of redeemable non-controlling interest | $   $ 1,240          
Non-Controlling Interests              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Reclassification of redeemable non-controlling interest | $   10,618          
PPU Holders Distribution | Common Class A              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 6,886,140            
Accelerated vesting of profit participation units, fair value | $ $ 126,000            
Accelerated vesting cash payment | $ $ 32,800            
PPU Holders Distribution | Common Stock | Common Class A              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 6,900,000            
PPU Holders Distribution | Common Stock | Common Class B              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Number of shares repurchased (in shares) 6,900,000            
Private Placement | Common Class A              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 34,500,000            
Private Placement | Common Class B-1              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Sale of stock, number of shares issued in transaction 12,300,000            
Private Placement | Common Stock | Common Class B              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Number of shares repurchased (in shares) 46,800,000            
Interest Holder In Non-Public Subsidiaries | Stockholders' Accumulated Deficit              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Reclassification of redeemable non-controlling interest | $   1,200          
Interest Holder In Non-Public Subsidiaries | Non-Controlling Interests              
Class of Stock [Line Items]              
Reclassification of redeemable non-controlling interest | $   $ (1,700)          
v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation - Narrative (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Millions
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
May 31, 2018
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]    
Conversion of Impax stock options outstanding on May 4, 2018 (in shares) 3,002,669  
Options, outstanding, weighted average remaining contractual term 7 years 4 months 17 days  
Options, exercisable, weighted average remaining contractual term 4 years 6 months 7 days  
Options, outstanding, intrinsic value $ 10.7  
Options exercisable, intrinsic value 7.4  
Compensation cost not yet recognized $ 48.2  
Compensation cost not yet recognized, period for recognition 3 years 10 months 24 days  
Options, exercises in period, intrinsic value $ 1.2  
Dividend yield 0.00%  
Employee Stock Option    
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]    
Award vesting period 4 years  
Expiration period 10 years  
Dividend yield 0.00%  
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)    
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]    
Restricted Stock Units, intrinsic value, outstanding $ 21.7  
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2018 Incentive Award Plan    
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]    
Number of shares authorized (in shares)   23,000,000
Number of shares available for grant (in shares) 18,288,353  
v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation - Stock Options (Details) - $ / shares
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Number of Shares Under Option  
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 (in shares) 0
Conversion of Impax stock options outstanding on May 4, 2018 (in shares) 3,002,669
Options granted (in shares) 3,391,199
Options exercised (in shares) (163,857)
Options forfeited (in shares) (201,800)
Outstanding at June 30, 2018 (in shares) 6,028,211
Options exercisable at June 30, 2018 (in shares) 2,637,012
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share  
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 (in dollars per share) $ 0.00
Conversion of Impax stock options outstanding on May 4, 2018 (in dollars per share) 18.90
Options granted (in dollars per share) 16.48
Options exercised (in dollars per share) 12.06
Options forfeited (in dollars per share) 27.54
Outstanding at June 30, 2018 (in dollars per share) 17.43
Options exercisable at June 30, 2018 (in dollars per share) $ 18.66
v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation - Restricted Stock Units (Details) - Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
$ / shares
shares
Number of Restricted Stock Units  
Non-vested at December 31, 2017 (in shares) | shares 0
Granted (in shares) | shares 1,320,448
Vested (in shares) | shares 0
Forfeited (in shares) | shares 0
Non-vested at June 30, 2018 (in shares) | shares 1,320,448
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Nonvested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value [Abstract]  
Non-vested at December 31, 2017 (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 0.00
Granted (in dollars per share) | $ / shares 17.06
Vested (in dollars per share) | $ / shares 0.00
Forfeited (in dollars per share) | $ / shares 0.00
Non-vested at June 30, 2018 (in dollars per share) | $ / shares $ 17.06
v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation - Valuation Assumptions (Details)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
$ / shares
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]  
Dividend yield 0.00%
Employee Stock Option  
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]  
Volatility 46.50%
Risk-free interest rate 2.90%
Dividend yield 0.00%
Weighted-average expected life (years) 6 years 3 months
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share) $ 8.06
v3.10.0.1
Share-Based Compensation - Share-based Compensation Expense (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]        
Share-based compensation expense $ 1,644 $ 0 $ 1,644 $ 0
Cost of revenues        
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]        
Share-based compensation expense 115 0 115 0
Selling, general and administrative        
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]        
Share-based compensation expense 1,423 0 1,423 0
Research and development        
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]        
Share-based compensation expense $ 106 $ 0 $ 106 $ 0
v3.10.0.1
Related-Party Transactions - Narrative (Details)
€ in Millions
1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended 13 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
payment
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
lease_agreement
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Mar. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Oct. 31, 2017
EUR (€)
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Related party receivables     $ 738,000   $ 738,000   $ 16,210,000    
Kanan, LLC | Affiliated Entity                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Number of lease agreements | lease_agreement         2        
Kanan, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Annual Rental Cost                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Amounts of transaction with related party         $ 2,000,000        
Kanan, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Rent Expense                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Expenses from transactions with related party     500,000 $ 0 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000      
AE Companies, LLC | Affiliated Entity                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Income from related parties     0 100,000 0 200,000      
Industrial Real Estate Holdings NY, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Rent Expense                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Expenses from transactions with related party     200,000 300,000 500,000 600,000      
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Related party receivables     600,000   600,000   10,400,000    
Related parties payable     1,600,000   1,600,000   600,000    
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity | Annual Base Rent                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Amounts of transaction with related party         1,800,000        
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity | Rental Income                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Income from related parties     0 100,000 400,000 1,000,000      
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity | Profit Share On Various Arrangements                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Expenses from transactions with related party     1,600,000 5,300,000 2,000,000 9,300,000      
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity | Product Acquisition And Royalty Stream Purchase Agreement                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Amounts of transaction with related party   $ 25,000,000              
Related parties payable     10,000,000   10,000,000        
Number of earn out payments | payment   2              
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity | Product Acquisition And Royalty Stream Purchase Agreement, Earn-out Payment                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Amounts of transaction with related party   $ 5,000,000              
Kashiv Pharmaceuticals LLC | Affiliated Entity | Legal Cost Reimbursement                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Amounts of transaction with related party             (7,800,000)    
Adello Biologics, LLC | Affiliated Entity                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Related parties payable             10,500,000    
Face amount of related party notes receivable             14,700,000   € 12.5
Interest rate on related party notes receivable                 2.00%
Related party notes receivable     0   0        
Adello Biologics, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Human Resource And Product Quality Assurance Services And License Agreement Expense                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Expenses from transactions with related party     100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000      
Adello Biologics, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Reimbursement Of Past Development Costs                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Expenses from transactions with related party               $ 10,000,000  
Adello Biologics, LLC | Affiliated Entity | License And Commercialization Agreement Up Front Payment                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Expenses from transactions with related party $ 1,500,000                
PharmaSophia, LLC | Affiliated Entity                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Income from related parties     100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000      
Related party receivables     100,000   100,000   100,000    
Gemini Laboratories, LLC | Affiliated Entity                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Related party receivables             $ 5,600,000    
Gemini Laboratories, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Profit Share On Various Arrangements                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Income from related parties     800,000 3,300,000 4,800,000 6,100,000      
Gemini Laboratories, LLC | Affiliated Entity | Gross Profit From Sale Of Inventory                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Income from related parties     0 $ 300,000 100,000 $ 900,000      
Amneal Holdings, LLC | Parent Company                  
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                  
Related parties payable     $ 0   $ 0        
v3.10.0.1
Employee Benefit Plans - Narrative (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Millions
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Retirement Benefits [Abstract]        
Contributions to defined contribution plan $ 1.3 $ 0.6 $ 4.3 $ 1.2
v3.10.0.1
- Segment Information (Details)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2018
USD ($)
product
segment
Jun. 30, 2017
USD ($)
Segment Reporting [Abstract]        
Number of reportable segments | segment     2  
Number of product families | product     200  
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]        
Net revenue $ 413,787 $ 259,871 $ 688,976 $ 485,552
Cost of goods sold 235,492 136,138 366,086 245,803
Gross profit 178,295 123,733 322,890 239,749
Selling, general and administrative 53,003 26,938 78,124 54,640
Research and development 50,335 47,184 94,544 86,603
Intellectual property legal development expenses 4,047 4,926 8,623 11,093
Acquisition and transaction-related expenses 207,507 82 214,642 82
Restructuring expenses 44,465 0 44,465 0
Operating (loss) income (181,062) 44,603 (117,508) 87,331
Operating Segments | Generic        
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]        
Net revenue 361,770 259,871 636,959 485,552
Cost of goods sold 211,534 136,138 342,128 245,803
Gross profit 150,236 123,733 294,831 239,749
Selling, general and administrative 16,621 14,845 27,824 29,808
Research and development 47,206 47,184 91,415 86,603
Intellectual property legal development expenses 4,004 4,926 8,580 11,093
Acquisition and transaction-related expenses 114,622 0 114,622 0
Restructuring expenses 24,797   24,797  
Operating (loss) income (57,014) 56,778 27,593 112,245
Operating Segments | Specialty        
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]        
Net revenue 52,017 0 52,017 0
Cost of goods sold 23,958 0 23,958 0
Gross profit 28,059 0 28,059 0
Selling, general and administrative 13,549 0 13,549 0
Research and development 3,129 0 3,129 0
Intellectual property legal development expenses 43 0 43 0
Acquisition and transaction-related expenses 0 0 0 0
Restructuring expenses 2,421   2,421  
Operating (loss) income 8,917 0 8,917 0
Corporate        
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]        
Net revenue 0 0 0 0
Cost of goods sold 0 0 0 0
Gross profit 0 0 0 0
Selling, general and administrative 22,833 12,093 36,751 24,832
Research and development 0 0 0 0
Intellectual property legal development expenses 0 0 0 0
Acquisition and transaction-related expenses 92,885 82 100,020 82
Restructuring expenses 17,247   17,247  
Operating (loss) income $ (132,965) $ (12,175) $ (154,018) $ (24,914)
v3.10.0.1
Segment Information - Disaggregation Of Revenue (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Jun. 30, 2018
Jun. 30, 2017
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue $ 413,787 $ 259,871 $ 688,976 $ 485,552
Diclofenac Sodium Gel        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue 31,820 22,643 52,096 42,120
Yuvafem-Estradiol        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue 30,827 40,387 50,094 70,777
Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue 27,919 8,742 44,941 15,594
Rytary® family        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue 20,520   20,520  
Epinephrine Auto-Injector family (generic Adrenaclick®)        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue $ 19,166      
Ranitidine        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue   8,678   16,498
Atovaquone        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue   $ 7,234    
Oseltamivir        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue     $ 39,634  
Lidocaine        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Net revenue       $ 15,878
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Diclofenac Sodium Gel        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage 8.00% 9.00% 8.00% 9.00%
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Yuvafem-Estradiol        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage 7.00% 16.00% 7.00% 15.00%
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Aspirin;Dipyridamole ER Capsul        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage 7.00% 3.00% 7.00% 3.00%
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Rytary® family        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage 5.00%   3.00%  
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Epinephrine Auto-Injector family (generic Adrenaclick®)        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage 5.00%      
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Ranitidine        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage   3.00%   3.00%
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Atovaquone        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage   3.00%    
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Oseltamivir        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage     6.00%  
Product Concentration Risk | Revenue from Contract with Customer | Lidocaine        
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]        
Concentration risk percentage       3.00%
v3.10.0.1
Label Element Value
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions $ 1,485,472,000
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Declared us-gaap_DistributionMadeToLimitedPartnerCashDistributionsDeclared 191,560,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueStockOptionsExercised 1,977,000
Temporary Equity, Accretion to Redemption Value us-gaap_TemporaryEquityAccretionToRedemptionValue 11,858,000
Adjustments to Additional Paid in Capital, Share-based Compensation, Requisite Service Period Recognition us-gaap_AdjustmentsToAdditionalPaidInCapitalSharebasedCompensationRequisiteServicePeriodRecognitionValue 1,644,000
Partners' Capital Account, Unit-based Compensation us-gaap_PartnersCapitalAccountUnitBasedCompensation 158,757,000
Noncontrolling Interest, Increase from Business Combination us-gaap_NoncontrollingInterestIncreaseFromBusinessCombination 3,049,000
Noncontrolling Interest, Increase from Subsidiary Equity Issuance us-gaap_NoncontrollingInterestIncreaseFromSubsidiaryEquityIssuance 360,000
Stockholders' Equity, Other us-gaap_StockholdersEquityOther 3,566,000
Partners' Capital Account, Contributions us-gaap_PartnersCapitalAccountContributions 27,742,000
Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue 32,714,000
PPU Holders Distribution [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue 4,823,000
Member Units [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions (189,215,000)
Partners' Capital Account, Unit-based Compensation us-gaap_PartnersCapitalAccountUnitBasedCompensation 158,757,000
Partners' Capital Account, Contributions us-gaap_PartnersCapitalAccountContributions 27,742,000
Retained Earnings [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions 709,612,000
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Declared us-gaap_DistributionMadeToLimitedPartnerCashDistributionsDeclared 182,998,000
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest us-gaap_ProfitLoss (148,806,000)
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest us-gaap_ProfitLoss (17,864,000)
Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions 325,918,000
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Declared us-gaap_DistributionMadeToLimitedPartnerCashDistributionsDeclared 8,562,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueStockOptionsExercised 2,241,000
Adjustments to Additional Paid in Capital, Share-based Compensation, Requisite Service Period Recognition us-gaap_AdjustmentsToAdditionalPaidInCapitalSharebasedCompensationRequisiteServicePeriodRecognitionValue 1,644,000
Stockholders' Equity, Other us-gaap_StockholdersEquityOther 2,154,000
Additional Paid-in Capital [Member] | Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue 165,180,000
Additional Paid-in Capital [Member] | PPU Holders Distribution [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue 24,293,000
AOCI Attributable to Parent [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions 9,437,000
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Foreign Currency Transaction and Translation Adjustment, Net of Tax us-gaap_OtherComprehensiveIncomeLossForeignCurrencyTransactionAndTranslationAdjustmentNetOfTax 1,721,000
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Foreign Currency Transaction and Translation Adjustment, Net of Tax us-gaap_OtherComprehensiveIncomeLossForeignCurrencyTransactionAndTranslationAdjustmentNetOfTax (1,170,000)
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueStockOptionsExercised (4,000)
AOCI Attributable to Parent [Member] | Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue (1,965,000)
AOCI Attributable to Parent [Member] | PPU Holders Distribution [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue (289,000)
Noncontrolling Interest [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions 626,737,000
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Foreign Currency Transaction and Translation Adjustment, Net of Tax us-gaap_OtherComprehensiveIncomeLossForeignCurrencyTransactionAndTranslationAdjustmentNetOfTax (1,576,000)
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueStockOptionsExercised (262,000)
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest us-gaap_ProfitLoss 97,000
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest us-gaap_ProfitLoss (31,865,000)
Noncontrolling Interest, Increase from Business Combination us-gaap_NoncontrollingInterestIncreaseFromBusinessCombination 3,049,000
Noncontrolling Interest, Increase from Subsidiary Equity Issuance us-gaap_NoncontrollingInterestIncreaseFromSubsidiaryEquityIssuance 360,000
Stockholders' Equity, Other us-gaap_StockholdersEquityOther 1,412,000
Noncontrolling Interest [Member] | Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue (130,501,000)
Noncontrolling Interest [Member] | PPU Holders Distribution [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue (19,181,000)
Common Class A [Member] | Common Stock [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions 733,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueStockOptionsExercised $ 2,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercises in Period us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodSharesStockOptionsExercised 164,000
Common Class A [Member] | Common Stock [Member] | Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Shares ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodShares 34,520,000
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue $ 345,000
Common Class A [Member] | Common Stock [Member] | PPU Holders Distribution [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Shares ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodShares 6,886,000
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue $ 69,000
Common Class B [Member] | Common Stock [Member]  
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Acquisitions us-gaap_StockIssuedDuringPeriodValueAcquisitions $ 2,250,000
Common Class B [Member] | Common Stock [Member] | Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Shares ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodShares (46,849,316)
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue $ (468,000)
Common Class B [Member] | Common Stock [Member] | PPU Holders Distribution [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Shares ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodShares (6,886,140)
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue $ (69,000)
Common Class B-1 [Member] | Common Stock [Member] | Private Placement [Member]  
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Shares ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodShares 12,328,767
Stock Repurchased And Reissued During Period, Value ipxl_StockRepurchasedAndReissuedDuringPeriodValue $ 123,000