IQVIA HOLDINGS INC., DEF 14A filed on 2/27/2026
Proxy Statement (definitive)
v3.25.4
Cover
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Document Information [Line Items]  
Document Type DEF 14A
Amendment Flag false
Entity Information [Line Items]  
Entity Registrant Name IQVIA HOLDINGS INC.
Entity Central Index Key 0001478242
v3.25.4
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
The following table reports the compensation of our Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and the average compensation of the other Named Executive Officers (Other NEOs) as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the past five fiscal years, as well as their “compensation actually paid” as calculated pursuant to SEC rules and certain performance measures required by the rules.
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO
($)(1)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
($)(2)(3)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Other NEOs
($)(1)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs
($)(2)(3)
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On(4):
Company-Selected Measure(5)
YearIQVIA’s Total Stockholder Return
($)
Peer Group Total Stockholder Return
($)
Net Income
($ millions)
Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth
(%)(6)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)
2025
28,128,245
36,068,712
8,869,621
11,081,528
125.81
186.82
1,360
7.1 
2024
26,732,998
11,450,139
6,575,714
4,095,455
109.68
158.83
1,373
9.1
2023
29,151,752
42,292,899
4,523,047
4,103,793
129.14
147.52
1,358
0.4
2022
30,135,029
5,961,064
5,007,016
1,702,449
114.36
137.91
1,091
12.5
2021
28,615,851
88,421,980
4,395,745
10,062,332
157.47
136.17
966
40.7
       
Company Selected Measure Name Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote Ari Bousbib was our PEO for each year presented. The individuals comprising the Other NEOs for each year presented are listed below:
20212022202320242025
Ronald E. Bruehlman
Ronald E. Bruehlman
Ronald E. Bruehlman
Ronald E. Bruehlman
Ronald E. Bruehlman
W. Richard Staub, III
Costa Panagos
W. Richard Staub, III
W. Richard Staub, III
W. Richard Staub, III
Kevin C. Knightly
Kevin C. Knightly
Kevin C. Knightly
Bhavik Patel
Alistair R. Grenfell
Eric M. Sherbet
Eric M. Sherbet
Eric M. Sherbet
Eric M. Sherbet
Eric M. Sherbet
Costa Panagos
       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote The compensation peer group for each listed fiscal year consists of the companies listed as our compensation benchmarking peer group in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis. For 2025, the companies included AbbVie Inc., Accenture plc, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Amgen Inc., Avantor, Inc., Biogen Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Danaher Corporation, Eli Lilly & Co., Gartner, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc., International Business Machines Corp., ICON Plc, Laboratory Corp of America Holdings, Merck & Co., Inc., Moderna, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Zoetis Inc.        
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 28,128,245 $ 26,732,998 $ 29,151,752 $ 30,135,029 $ 28,615,851
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 36,068,712 11,450,139 42,292,899 5,961,064 88,421,980
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEO and the Other NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO
($)
Exclusion of Change in Pension Value for PEO
($)
Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards for PEO
($)
Inclusion of Pension Service Cost for PEO
($)
Inclusion of Equity Values for PEO
($)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
($)
2025
28,128,245
(689,848)
(20,278,274)
270,289
28,638,300
36,068,712
2024
26,732,998
(707,772)
(20,238,983)
279,972
5,383,924
11,450,139
2023
29,151,752
(844,991)
(21,157,852)
258,365
34,885,625
42,292,899
2022
30,135,029
(420,742)
(21,388,958)
296,785
(2,661,050)
5,961,064
2021
28,615,851
(535,539)
(18,534,470)
314,052
78,562,087
88,421,980
The amounts for Messrs. Grenfell and Patel have been converted from GBP to U.S. dollars using the average of the monthly average exchange rates for 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:
YearYear-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for PEO
($)
Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for PEO
($)
Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for PEO
($)
Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for PEO
($)
Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for PEO
($)
Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Included for PEO
($)
Total - Inclusion of Equity Values for PEO
($)
2025
24,951,534
3,156,942
529,824
28,638,300
2024
17,350,975
(6,450,390)
(3,738,897)
(1,777,764)
5,383,924
2023
22,020,972
1,379,297
11,485,356
34,885,625
2022
16,869,138
(15,553,971)
(3,976,217)
(2,661,050)
2021
34,647,149
25,065,538
18,849,400
78,562,087
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 8,869,621 6,575,714 4,523,047 5,007,016 4,395,745
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 11,081,528 4,095,455 4,103,793 1,702,449 10,062,332
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote
YearAverage Summary Compensation Table Total for Other NEOs
($)
Average Exclusion of Change in Pension Value for Other NEOs
($)
Average Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards for Other NEOs
($)
Average Inclusion of Pension Service Cost for Other NEOs
($)
Average Inclusion of Equity Values for Other NEOs
($)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs
($)
2025
8,869,621
(44,456)
(6,999,883)
16,601
9,239,646
11,081,528
2024
6,575,714
(40,796)
(4,937,350)
15,913
2,481,974
4,095,455
2023
4,523,047
(73,164)
(3,228,937)
17,778
2,865,069
4,103,793
2022
5,007,016
(46,106)
(3,363,826)
22,217
83,148
1,702,449
2021
4,395,745
(45,384)
(2,548,372)
23,204
8,237,139
10,062,332
YearAverage Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Other NEOs
($)
Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Other NEOs
($)
Average Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for Other NEOs
($)
Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Other NEOs
($)
Average Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Other NEOs
($)
Average Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Included for Other NEOs
($)
Total - Average Inclusion of Equity Values for Other NEOs
($)
2025
8,317,047
828,084
94,514
9,239,646
2024
4,043,003
(844,438)
(484,051)
(232,541)
2,481,974
2023
2,411,696
153,127
1,274,065
(973,819)
2,865,069
2022
2,660,228
(2,066,942)
(510,138)
83,148
2021
4,763,789
2,005,653
1,467,697
8,237,139
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance Measures
In light of the significant weighting of long-term stock-based incentives in our pay mix due to the intended alignment between our named executive officers and stockholders, the Compensation Actually Paid values are significantly influenced by the value of IQVIA’s stock price. The table below reflects the relationship between the PEO and the average Other NEO compensation actually paid and the performance measures shown in the pay versus performance table from 2021 to 2025:
PeriodCompensation Actually Paid to PEO
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs
IQVIA’s TSR
Peer Group TSR
Net Income
Adj. Diluted EPS Growth
2021 to 2025
(59)
%
â
10
%
á
26
%
á
87
%
á
41
%
á
86
%
á
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Cumulative TSR. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 26% increase in our TSR over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Net Income. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 41% increase in our Net Income over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 86% increase in our Adjusted Diluted EPS over the same time period.
Relationship Between the Company’s TSR and the Peer Group TSR. The TSR for the peer group disclosed in the table above increased by 87% from 2021 to 2025 as compared to the Company’s TSR, which increased by 26% over the same time period.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance Measures
In light of the significant weighting of long-term stock-based incentives in our pay mix due to the intended alignment between our named executive officers and stockholders, the Compensation Actually Paid values are significantly influenced by the value of IQVIA’s stock price. The table below reflects the relationship between the PEO and the average Other NEO compensation actually paid and the performance measures shown in the pay versus performance table from 2021 to 2025:
PeriodCompensation Actually Paid to PEO
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs
IQVIA’s TSR
Peer Group TSR
Net Income
Adj. Diluted EPS Growth
2021 to 2025
(59)
%
â
10
%
á
26
%
á
87
%
á
41
%
á
86
%
á
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Cumulative TSR. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 26% increase in our TSR over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Net Income. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 41% increase in our Net Income over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 86% increase in our Adjusted Diluted EPS over the same time period.
Relationship Between the Company’s TSR and the Peer Group TSR. The TSR for the peer group disclosed in the table above increased by 87% from 2021 to 2025 as compared to the Company’s TSR, which increased by 26% over the same time period.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance Measures
In light of the significant weighting of long-term stock-based incentives in our pay mix due to the intended alignment between our named executive officers and stockholders, the Compensation Actually Paid values are significantly influenced by the value of IQVIA’s stock price. The table below reflects the relationship between the PEO and the average Other NEO compensation actually paid and the performance measures shown in the pay versus performance table from 2021 to 2025:
PeriodCompensation Actually Paid to PEO
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs
IQVIA’s TSR
Peer Group TSR
Net Income
Adj. Diluted EPS Growth
2021 to 2025
(59)
%
â
10
%
á
26
%
á
87
%
á
41
%
á
86
%
á
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Cumulative TSR. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 26% increase in our TSR over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Net Income. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 41% increase in our Net Income over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 86% increase in our Adjusted Diluted EPS over the same time period.
Relationship Between the Company’s TSR and the Peer Group TSR. The TSR for the peer group disclosed in the table above increased by 87% from 2021 to 2025 as compared to the Company’s TSR, which increased by 26% over the same time period.
       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance Measures
In light of the significant weighting of long-term stock-based incentives in our pay mix due to the intended alignment between our named executive officers and stockholders, the Compensation Actually Paid values are significantly influenced by the value of IQVIA’s stock price. The table below reflects the relationship between the PEO and the average Other NEO compensation actually paid and the performance measures shown in the pay versus performance table from 2021 to 2025:
PeriodCompensation Actually Paid to PEO
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs
IQVIA’s TSR
Peer Group TSR
Net Income
Adj. Diluted EPS Growth
2021 to 2025
(59)
%
â
10
%
á
26
%
á
87
%
á
41
%
á
86
%
á
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Cumulative TSR. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 26% increase in our TSR over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Net Income. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 41% increase in our Net Income over the same time period.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the Average of the Compensation Actually Paid to the Other NEOs and the Company’s Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth. From 2021 to 2025, the compensation actually paid to our PEO decreased by 59% and the average of the compensation actually paid to the Other NEOs increased by 10%, compared to a 86% increase in our Adjusted Diluted EPS over the same time period.
Relationship Between the Company’s TSR and the Peer Group TSR. The TSR for the peer group disclosed in the table above increased by 87% from 2021 to 2025 as compared to the Company’s TSR, which increased by 26% over the same time period.
       
Tabular List, Table
Performance Metrics
Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 57)
Relative Total Stockholder Return (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation— Long-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 60)
Revenue (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 57)
Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 57)
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 125.81 109.68 129.14 114.36 157.47
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 186.82 158.83 147.52 137.91 136.17
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,360,000,000 $ 1,373,000,000 $ 1,358,000,000 $ 1,091,000,000 $ 966,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 0.071 0.091 0.004 0.125 0.407
PEO Name Ari Bousbib        
Additional 402(v) Disclosure The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v)(2)(iii) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized or received by the PEO or Other NEOs. The amounts for Messrs. Grenfell and Patel have been converted from GBP to U.S. dollars using the average of the monthly average exchange rates for 2025 and 2024, respectively. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table Total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below.        
Measure:: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 57)        
Non-GAAP Measure Description The Company has identified Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth as the company-selected measure for the pay versus performance disclosure, as it represents the most important financial performance measure used to link compensation actually paid to the PEO and the Other NEOs in 2025 to the Company’s performance. See Appendix A in this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of Adjusted Diluted EPS Growth, a non-GAAP measure, to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.        
Measure:: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Relative Total Stockholder Return (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation— Long-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 60)        
Measure:: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Revenue (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 57)        
Measure:: 4          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Awards,” described on page 57)        
PEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (689,848) $ (707,772) $ (844,991) $ (420,742) $ (535,539)
PEO | Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 270,289 279,972 258,365 296,785 314,052
PEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (20,278,274) (20,238,983) (21,157,852) (21,388,958) (18,534,470)
PEO | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 28,638,300 5,383,924 34,885,625 (2,661,050) 78,562,087
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 24,951,534 17,350,975 22,020,972 16,869,138 34,647,149
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 3,156,942 (6,450,390) 1,379,297 (15,553,971) 25,065,538
PEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0 0
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 529,824 (3,738,897) 11,485,356 (3,976,217) 18,849,400
PEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 (1,777,764) 0 0 0
PEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (44,456) (40,796) (73,164) (46,106) (45,384)
Non-PEO NEO | Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 16,601 15,913 17,778 22,217 23,204
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (6,999,883) (4,937,350) (3,228,937) (3,363,826) (2,548,372)
Non-PEO NEO | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 9,239,646 2,481,974 2,865,069 83,148 8,237,139
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 8,317,047 4,043,003 2,411,696 2,660,228 4,763,789
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 828,084 (844,438) 153,127 (2,066,942) 2,005,653
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 94,514 (484,051) 1,274,065 (510,138) 1,467,697
Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 (232,541) (973,819) 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
v3.25.4
Award Timing Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Award Timing Disclosures [Line Items]  
Award Timing MNPI Disclosure
Annual grants of SARs to our named executive officers are currently made pursuant to our 2017 Incentive and Stock Award Plan and are recommended by the LDC Committee at its first regularly scheduled meeting of the fiscal year and then approved by the Board. Annual grants of SARs to other eligible employees are made on the same grant date as those to the named executive officers. For any SAR grants, the LDC Committee recommends, and the Board approves, without regard to the timing of IQVIA’s fourth quarter earnings release or the planned issuance of any other material nonpublic information. It is the Company’s practice not to time the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
Award Timing Method For any SAR grants, the LDC Committee recommends, and the Board approves, without regard to the timing of IQVIA’s fourth quarter earnings release or the planned issuance of any other material nonpublic information. It is the Company’s practice not to time the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
Award Timing Predetermined false
Award Timing MNPI Considered false
Award Timing, How MNPI Considered not to time
MNPI Disclosure Timed for Compensation Value false
v3.25.4
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures [Line Items]  
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures Adopted true