1. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared by TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (the “Company,” “Treehouse,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applicable to quarterly reporting on Form 10-Q. In our opinion, these statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of all interim periods reported herein. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual results.

The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to use our judgment to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

A detailed description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date, clarifying how entities are required to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements and outlining the required disclosures around these liabilities. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. See Note 11, Long-Term Debt, for related disclosures. The Company adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2014, the impact of which was not significant.

3. Restructuring

Soup restructuring — In August of 2012, following a strategic review of the soup category, the Company announced a restructuring plan that included reductions to the cost structure of the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania facility by reorganizing and simplifying the soup business there and the closure of its Mendota, Illinois soup plant. The restructuring is expected to reduce manufacturing costs by streamlining operations and transferring production from the Mendota plant to the Pittsburgh plant. Production at the Mendota facility was primarily related to the North American Retail Grocery segment and ended as of December 31, 2012, with full plant closure in the second quarter of 2013. Total costs of the restructuring are expected to be approximately $27.8 million as detailed below, of which $5.2 million is expected to be in cash. Expenses associated with the restructuring plan are primarily aggregated in the Other operating expense, net line of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, with the exception of accelerated depreciation, which is recorded in Cost of sales.

Seaforth, Ontario, Canada — On August 7, 2012, the Company announced the closure of its salad dressing plant in Seaforth, Ontario, Canada and the transfer of production to facilities where the Company has lower production costs. Production at the Seaforth, Ontario facility was primarily related to the North American Retail Grocery segment and ended in the fourth quarter of 2013, with full plant closure occurring in the first quarter of 2014. Total costs to close the Seaforth facility are expected to be approximately $13.2 million as detailed below, of which $6.2 million is expected to be in cash. Expenses incurred associated with the facility closure are primarily aggregated in the Other operating expense, net line of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain costs, primarily accelerated depreciation, are recorded in Cost of sales.

Below is a summary of the restructuring costs:

4. Acquisitions

The Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Associated Brands Management Holdings Inc., Associated Brands Holdings Limited Partnership, Associated Brands GP Corporation and 6726607 Canada Ltd. (collectively, “Associated Brands”) from TorQuest Partners LLC and other shareholders in October of 2013. Associated Brands is a privately owned Canadian company and a private label manufacturer of powdered drinks, specialty teas, and sweeteners. The purchase price, after adjusting for working capital, was approximately CAD $191 million. The acquisition was financed through cash on hand and borrowings under the Company’s existing $750 million credit facility. The acquisition of Associated Brands strengthened the Company’s retail presence in the private label dry grocery segment and introduced a line of specialty tea products to complement its single serve coffee business, and is being accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. At the date of acquisition, the purchase price was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon fair market values, and is subject to adjustments, primarily for taxes. During the first quarter of 2014, the working capital adjustment was finalized and resulted in a CAD $1.4 million reduction to goodwill.

On July 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of Cains Foods, L.P. (“Cains”), a privately owned Ayer, Massachusetts based manufacturer of shelf stable mayonnaise, dressings, and sauces. The Cains product portfolio offers retail and foodservice customers a wide array of packaging sizes, sold as private label and branded products. The purchase price was approximately $35 million, net of acquired cash, after adjusting for working capital and taxes. The acquisition was financed through borrowings under the Company’s existing $750 million credit facility. The acquisition expanded the Company’s footprint in the Northeast United States, enhanced its foodservice presence, and enriched its packaging capabilities. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting and the results of operations are included in our financial statements from the date of acquisition. There have been no changes to the purchase price allocation in 2014.

5. Investments

We determine the appropriate classification of our investments at the time of purchase and reevaluate such designation as of each balance sheet date. The Company accounts for investments in debt and marketable equity securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading, depending on their classification. The investments held by the Company are classified as trading securities and are stated at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as a component of the Interest income line on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash flows from purchases, sales and maturities of trading securities are included in cash flows from investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows based on the nature and purpose for which the securities were acquired.

Our investments include U.S. equity, non-U.S. equity and fixed income securities that are classified as short-term investments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The U.S. equity, non-U.S. equity, and fixed income securities are classified as short-term investments as they have characteristics of other current assets and are actively managed.

We recognized insignificant unrealized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and $0.4 million of unrealized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The unrealized gains are included in Interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. When securities are sold, their cost is determined based on the first-in, first-out method.

We consider temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $10.6 million and $19.3 million, respectively, represent cash and equivalents held in Canada, in local currency, and is convertible into other currencies. The cash and equivalents held in Canada are expected to be used for general corporate purposes in Canada, including capital projects and acquisitions.

6. Inventories

Approximately $61.4 million and $84.6 million of our inventory was accounted for under the Last-in, First-out (“LIFO”) method of accounting at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

7. Property, Plant and Equipment

Depreciation expense was $17.0 million and $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are as follows:

The Company has not incurred any goodwill impairments since its inception.

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets other than goodwill as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Amortization expense on intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $10.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense on intangible assets for 2014 and the next four years is as follows:

9. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

10. Income Taxes

Income tax expense was recorded at an effective rate of 28.5% and 31.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate is favorably impacted by an intercompany financing structure entered into in conjunction with the E.D. Smith Foods, Ltd. (“E.D. Smith”) acquisition in 2007. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to 2013 is attributable to the settlement of unrecognized tax benefits associated with the Company’s 2011 examination by the United States Internal Revenue Services (“IRS”).

The IRS completed its examination of TreeHouse’s 2011 tax year during the first quarter of 2014, resulting in a small cash payment by the Company. The Canadian Revenue Agency (“CRA”) is currently examining the 2008, 2009, and 2010 tax years of E.D. Smith. The E.D. Smith examinations are expected to be completed in 2014 or 2015. The Company also has examinations in process with various state taxing authorities, which are expected to be completed in 2014 or 2015.

Management estimates that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by as much as $8.5 million within the next 12 months, primarily as a result of the resolution of audits currently in progress and the lapsing of statutes of limitations.

11. Long-Term Debt

Revolving Credit Facility — As of March 31, 2014, the Company was party to an unsecured revolving credit facility with an aggregate commitment of $750 million, of which $344.2 million was available. The revolving credit facility had a maturity date of September 23, 2016. In addition, as of March 31, 2014, there were $10.8 million in letters of credit under the revolving credit facility that were issued but undrawn. The revolving credit facility contained various financial and other restrictive covenants and required that the Company maintained certain financial ratios, including a leverage and interest coverage ratio. The Company’s average interest rate on debt outstanding under its revolving credit facility for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was 1.38%.

2018 Notes — The Company previously issued 7.75% notes in aggregate principal amount of $400 million due on March 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). As of March 31, 2014, the 2018 Notes were guaranteed, jointly and severally, by the Company’s 100 percent owned subsidiary Bay Valley Foods, LLC (“Bay Valley”) and Bay Valley’s 100 percent owned subsidiaries EDS Holdings, LLC, Sturm Foods, Inc. (“Sturm Foods”), and S.T. Specialty Foods. The 2018 Notes were senior unsecured obligations of the Company.

On February 25, 2014, the Company commenced a tender offer and consent solicitation to repurchase and extinguish $400 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the tender offer, the Company offered to repurchase the 2018 Notes at a price of 104.275% of the principal amount (plus any accrued but unpaid interest to, but excluding the payment date), for any 2018 Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the consent expiration time on March 10, 2014. As of the consent expiration time, the holders had tendered approximately $298 million in aggregate principal amount of 2018 Notes, and the Company accepted all such 2018 Notes tendered for purchase and extinguishment on March 11, 2014. The remaining holders had until March 24, 2014 to tender their 2018 Notes at a reduced rate of 101.275% of the principal amount; no additional 2018 Notes were tendered prior to the final expiration of the tender offer and consent solicitation. During the quarter, the Company incurred a loss on extinguishment of the 2018 Notes totaling $16.7 million that included the write-off of $3.9 million in deferred financing costs.

On March 11, 2014, the Company issued a redemption notice for all of its remaining outstanding 2018 Notes. On April 10, 2014, all remaining outstanding 2018 Notes, or approximately $101.8 million in aggregate principal amount, were redeemed at a price of 103.875% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest. Accordingly, no 2018 Notes remain outstanding as of the date of this Report.

2022 Notes — On March 11, 2014, the Company completed its underwritten public offering of $400 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.875% notes due March 15, 2022 (the “2022 Notes”). The net proceeds of $394 million ($400 million less underwriting discount of $6 million, providing an effective interest rate of 4.99%) were used to extinguish $298 million of the 2018 Notes with the balance of the proceeds being used to temporarily pay down the revolving credit facility. The Company issued the 2022 Notes pursuant to an Indenture, dated March 2, 2010 (the “Base Indenture”), between the Company, the 100% owned subsidiary guarantors (which, as of March 31, 2014, were comprised of its 100% owned direct and indirect subsidiaries Bay Valley, EDS Holdings, LLC, Sturm Foods, and S.T. Specialty Foods, known collectively as the “Guarantors”) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as trustee (the “Trustee”), as supplemented by the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 11, 2014, (the “Supplemental Indenture” and, together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”), among the Company, the Guarantors, and the Trustee.

The Indenture provides, among other things, that the 2022 Notes will be senior unsecured obligations of the Company. The Company’s payment obligations under the 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally, as well as jointly and severally, guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantors, in addition to any future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee or become borrowers under its credit facility, or guarantee certain other indebtedness incurred by the Company or its restricted subsidiaries. Interest is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2014. The 2022 Notes will mature on March 15, 2022.

The Company may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes at any time prior to March 15, 2017 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes redeemed, plus an applicable “make-whole” premium. On or after March 15, 2017, the Company may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes at redemption prices set forth in the Indenture. In addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2017, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes at a redemption price of 104.875% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes redeemed with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings.

Subject to certain limitations, in the event of a change of control of the Company, the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase the 2022 Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The Indenture contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and the Guarantors to: (i) pay dividends or make other restricted payments, (ii) make certain investments, (iii) incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, (iv) create liens, (v) pay dividends or make other payments (except for certain dividends and payments to the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company), (vi) merge or consolidate with other entities or sell substantially all of its assets, (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates and (viii) engage in certain sale and leaseback transactions. The foregoing limitations are subject to exceptions as set forth in the Indenture. In addition, if in the future the 2022 Notes have an investment grade credit rating by both Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, certain of these covenants will, thereafter, no longer apply to the 2022 Notes for so long as the 2022 Notes are rated investment grade by the two rating agencies.

Tax Increment Financing —The Company owes $1.8 million related to redevelopment bonds pursuant to a Tax Increment Financing Plan and has agreed to make certain payments with respect to the principal amount of the bonds through May 2019.

12. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The weighted average number of common shares used in the diluted earnings per share calculation is determined using the treasury stock method and includes the incremental effect related to the Company’s outstanding stock-based compensation awards.

The following table summarizes the effect of the share-based compensation awards on the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in calculating diluted earnings per share:

13. Stock-Based Compensation

Income before income taxes for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 includes share-based compensation expense of $4.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The tax benefit recognized related to the compensation cost of these share-based awards was approximately $1.5 million and $1.3 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Stock options are granted under our long-term incentive plan, and generally have a three year vesting schedule, which vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Stock options expire ten years from the grant date.

Compensation costs related to unvested options totaled $5.8 million at March 31, 2014 and will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of the grants, which averages 1.8 years. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value its stock option awards. The weighted average grant date fair value of awards granted during the first quarter of 2014 was $21.93. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $10.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The tax benefit recognized from stock option exercises was $4.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In addition to stock options, the Company may also grant restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance unit awards. These awards are granted under our long-term incentive plan. Employee restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards generally vest based on the passage of time. These awards generally vest one-third on each anniversary of the grant date. Director restricted stock units generally vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Certain directors have deferred receipt of their awards until their departure from the Board of Directors, or a specified date. The following table summarizes the restricted stock unit activity during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Future compensation costs related to restricted stock units are approximately $10.1 million as of March 31, 2014, and will be recognized on a weighted average basis, over the next 1.6 years. The grant date fair value of the awards granted in 2014 is equal to the Company’s closing stock price on the grant date. The fair value of vested restricted stock units was insignificant during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Performance unit awards are granted to certain members of management. These awards contain service and performance conditions. For each of the three performance periods, one third of the units will accrue, multiplied by a predefined percentage between 0% and 200%, depending on the achievement of certain operating performance measures. Additionally, for the cumulative performance period, a number of units will accrue, equal to the number of units granted, multiplied by a predefined percentage between 0% and 200%, depending on the achievement of certain operating performance measures, less any units previously accrued. Accrued units will be converted to stock or cash, at the discretion of the compensation committee, generally, on the third anniversary of the grant date. The Company intends to settle these awards in stock and has the shares available to do so. The following table summarizes the performance unit activity during the three months ended March 31, 2014:

Future compensation costs related to the performance units is estimated to be approximately $9.6 million as of March 31, 2014, and is expected to be recognized over the next 1.9 years. The grant fair value of the awards is equal to the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant.

14. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss consists of the following components all of which are net of tax, except for the foreign currency translation adjustment:

The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income lines impacted by reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss are outlined below:

15. Employee Retirement and Postretirement Benefits

Pension, Profit Sharing and Postretirement Benefits — Certain employees and retirees participate in pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Employee benefit plan obligations and expenses included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are determined based on plan assumptions, employee demographic data, including years of service and compensation, benefits and claims paid, and employer contributions.

Components of net periodic pension expense are as follows:

The Company contributed $0.4 million to the pension plans in the first three months of 2014 and expects to contribute approximately $4.1 million in 2014.

Components of net periodic postretirement expenses are as follows:

The Company expects to contribute approximately $0.2 million to the postretirement health plans during 2014.

Net periodic pension costs are recorded in the Cost of sales and General and administrative lines of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

16. Other Operating Expense, Net

The Company incurred other operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, which consisted of the following:

17. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Non-cash financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 include the settlement of 1,242 shares and 23,713 shares, respectively, of restricted stock units and performance units, where shares were withheld to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.

18. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation, Investigations and Audits — The Company is party in the ordinary course of business to certain claims, litigation, audits and investigations. The Company believes that it has established adequate reserves to satisfy any liability that may be incurred in connection with any such currently pending or threatened matters. The settlement of any such currently pending or threatened matters is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, annual results of operations or cash flows.

19. Derivative Instruments

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by derivative instruments include interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and commodity price risk. Derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposure and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates by optimizing the use of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates, to reduce the volatility of our financing costs, and to achieve a desired proportion of fixed versus floating-rate debt, based on current and projected market conditions, with a bias toward fixed-rate debt.

Due to the Company’s operations in Canada, we are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Company enters into foreign currency contracts to manage the risk associated with foreign currency cash flows. The Company’s objective in using foreign currency contracts is to establish a fixed foreign currency exchange rate for the net cash flow requirements for purchases that are denominated in U.S. dollars. These contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in their fair value are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, with their fair value recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any foreign currency contracts outstanding.

Certain commodities we use in the production and distribution of our products are exposed to market price risk. The Company utilizes derivative contracts to manage this risk. The majority of commodity forward contracts are not derivatives, and those that are, generally qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception under the guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities, and therefore are not subject to its provisions. For derivative commodity contracts that do not qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception, the Company records their fair value on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with changes in value being recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company’s derivative commodity contracts may include contracts for diesel, oil, plastics, natural gas, electricity, and other commodity contracts that do not meet the requirements for the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception.

The Company’s diesel contracts are used to manage the Company’s risk associated with the underlying cost of diesel fuel used to deliver products. The contracts for oil and plastics are used to manage the Company’s risk associated with the underlying commodity cost of a significant component used in packaging materials. Contracts for natural gas and electricity are used to manage the Company’s risk associated with the utility costs of its manufacturing facilities, and commodity contracts that are derivatives that do not meet the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception are used to manage the price risk associated with raw material costs. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding contracts for the purchase of 30,748 megawatts of electricity, expiring throughout 2014.

The following table identifies the derivative, its fair value, and location on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:

We recorded the following gains and losses on our derivative contracts in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

20. Fair Value

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of our financial instruments as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable are financial assets with carrying values that approximate fair value. Accounts payable are financial liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value.

The fair value of the revolving credit facility, 2018 Notes, 2022 Notes, and commodity contracts are determined using Level 2 inputs. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for an asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of the revolving credit facility was estimated using present value techniques and market based interest rates and credit spreads. The fair value of the Company’s 2018 and 2022 Notes was estimated based on quoted market prices for similar instruments, where the inputs are considered Level 2, due to their infrequent trading volume.

The fair value of the commodity contracts is based on an analysis comparing the contract rates to the market rates at the balance sheet date. The commodity contracts are recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of the investments is determined using Level 1 inputs. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement dates. The investments are recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

21. Segment and Geographic Information and Major Customers

The Company manages operations on a company-wide basis, thereby making determinations as to the allocation of resources in total rather than on a segment-level basis. The Company has designated reportable segments based on how management views its business. The Company does not segregate assets between segments for internal reporting. Therefore, asset-related information has not been presented. The reportable segments, as presented below, are consistent with the manner in which the Company reports its results to the chief operating decision maker.

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on net sales dollars and direct operating income (gross profit less freight out, sales commissions and direct selling and marketing expenses). The amounts in the following tables are obtained from reports used by senior management and do not include income taxes. Other expenses not allocated include unallocated selling and distribution expenses, unallocated costs of sales and unallocated corporate expenses. The accounting policies of the Company’s segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Geographic Information — The Company had revenues to customers outside of the United States of approximately 13.0% of total consolidated net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, with 12.0% and 11.7% going to Canada, respectively.

Major Customers — Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and affiliates accounted for approximately 18.4% and 20.3% of consolidated net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales.

Product Information — The following table presents the Company’s net sales by major products for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

22. Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information

As of March 31, 2014, the Company’s 2018 and 2022 Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by its 100% owned direct and indirect subsidiaries Bay Valley, EDS Holdings, LLC, Sturm Foods, and S.T. Specialty Foods. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the parent company or any guarantor to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan. The following condensed supplemental consolidating financial information presents the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the parent company, its guarantor subsidiaries, its non-guarantor subsidiaries and the eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for the Company on a consolidated basis as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, and for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and 2013. The equity method has been used with respect to investments in subsidiaries. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.

Condensed Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheet

March 31, 2014

(In thousands)