Filed Pursuant to Rule 497(c)
Registration No. 333-164270
$500,000,000
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
Common
Stock
Preferred
Stock
Debt
Securities
Warrants
We
may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, together or
separately, up to $500,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt
securities or rights to purchase shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities, collectively, the Securities, to provide us with additional capital.
Securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more
supplements to this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the
applicable prospectus supplement carefully before you invest in our
Securities.
We
may offer shares of common stock at a discount to net asset value per share in
certain circumstances. Sales of common stock at prices below net asset value per
share dilute the interests of existing stockholders, have the effect of reducing
our net asset value per share and may reduce our market price per
share.
Our
Securities may be offered directly to one or more purchasers, or through agents
designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers.
The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will disclose any
applicable purchase price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between us
and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which
such amount may be calculated. See "Plan of Distribution." We may not sell any
of our Securities through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of
the prospectus and a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of
the offering of such Securities. Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol "PSEC." As of February 25, 2010, the last
reported sales price for our common stock was $11.66.
Prospect
Capital Corporation, or the Company, is a company that lends to and invests in
middle market privately-held companies. Prospect Capital Corporation, a Maryland
corporation, has been organized as a closed-end investment company since April
13, 2004 and has filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act,
and is a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940
Act.
Prospect
Capital Management LLC, our investment adviser, manages our investments and
Prospect Administration LLC, our administrator, provides the administrative
services necessary for us to operate.
Investing
in our Securities involves a heightened risk of total loss of investment and is
subject to risks. Before buying any Securities, you should read the discussion
of the material risks of investing in our Securities in "Risk Factors" beginning
on page 9 of this prospectus.
This
prospectus contains important information about us that you should know before
investing in our Securities. Please read it before making an investment decision
and keep it for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information about us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC. You may make inquiries or obtain this information free
of charge by writing to Prospect Capital Corporation at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, or by calling 212-448-0702. Our Internet address
is http://www.prospectstreet.com. You may also obtain information about us from
our website and the SEC's website (http://www.sec.gov).
The
SEC has not approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete.
Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This
prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of securities unless accompanied
by a prospectus supplement.
The
date of this Prospectus is March 4, 2010
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
About
This Prospectus
|
1
|
|
Prospectus
Summary
|
2
|
|
Selected
Condensed Financial Data
|
8
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
27
|
|
Report
of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
47
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
47
|
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
|
48
|
|
Distributions
|
50
|
|
Senior
Securities
|
52
|
|
Price
Range of Common Stock
|
53
|
|
Business
|
54
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Transactions
|
79
|
|
Control
Persons and Principal Stockholders
|
79
|
|
Portfolio
Companies
|
81
|
|
Determination
of Net Asset Value
|
85
|
|
Sales
of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value
|
86
|
|
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
|
90
|
|
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
|
91
|
|
Description
of Our Capital Stock
|
97
|
|
Description
of Our Preferred Stock
|
104
|
|
Description
of our Debt Securities
|
105
|
|
Description
of Our Warrants
|
106
|
|
Regulation
|
107
|
|
Custodian,
Transfer and Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar
|
113
|
|
Brokerage
Allocation and Other Practices
|
113
|
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
113
|
|
Legal
Matters
|
115
|
|
Independent
Registered accounting Firm
|
115
|
|
Available
Information
|
115
|
|
Index
to Financial Statements
|
116
|
This
prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the SEC,
using the "shelf" registration process. Under the shelf registration process, we
may offer, from time to time on a delayed basis, up to $500,000,000 of our
common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing rights
to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities on
the terms to be determined at the time of the offering. The Securities may be
offered at prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this
prospectus. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the
Securities that we may offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer
Securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific
information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also
add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. Please carefully
read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement together with any exhibits
and the additional information described under the heading "Available
Information" and the section under the heading "Risk Factors" before you make an
investment decision.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
The
following summary contains basic information about this offering. It does not
contain all the information that may be important to an investor. For a more
complete understanding of this offering, we encourage you to read this entire
document and the documents to which we have referred.
Information
contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus may contain
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are statements about the future that may be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will,"
"expect," "intend," "plans," "anticipate," "estimate" or "continue" or the
negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. These
forward-looking statements do not meet the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements pursuant to Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act. The matters described in "Risk Factors" and certain other
factors noted throughout this prospectus and in any exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, constitute cautionary statements
identifying important factors with respect to any such forward-looking
statements, including certain risks and uncertainties, that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. The
Company reminds all investors that no forward-looking statement can be relied
upon as an accurate or even mostly accurate forecast because humans cannot
forecast the future.
The
terms "we," "us," "our," and "Company" refer to Prospect Capital Corporation;
"Prospect Capital Management" or the "Investment Adviser" refers to Prospect
Capital Management LLC, our investment adviser; "Prospect Administration" or the
"Administrator" refers to Prospect Administration LLC, our administrator; and
"Prospect" refers to Prospect Capital Management LLC, its affiliates and its
predecessor companies.
The
Company
We
are a financial services company that lends to and invests in middle market
privately-held companies.
We
were originally organized under the name "Prospect Street Energy Corporation"
and we changed our name to "Prospect Energy Corporation" in June 2004. We
changed our name again to "Prospect Capital Corporation" in May 2007 and at the
same time terminated our policy of investing at least 80% of our net assets in
energy companies. While we expect to be less focused on the energy industry in
the future, we will continue to have significant holdings in the energy and
energy related industries. On December 2, 2009, we completed our
previously announced acquisition of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc., or Patriot,
under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2009, by and
among, us and Patriot. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we
acquired Patriot for approximately $200 million comprised of our common stock
and cash to repay all of Patriot’s outstanding debt, which amounted to $107.3
million. In the merger, each outstanding share of Patriot common
stock was converted into the right to receive 0.363992 shares of common stock of
Prospect, representing 8,444,068 shares of the Company’s common stock, and the
payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares of Prospect common stock of less
than $200 resulting from the application of the foregoing exchange
ratio.
We
have been organized as a closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004 and
have filed an election to be treated as a business development company under the
1940 Act. We are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
Our headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY
10016, and our telephone number is (212) 448-0702.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect
Capital Management, an affiliate of the Company, manages our investment
activities. Prospect Capital Management is an investment adviser that has been
registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Advisers Act, since
March 31, 2004. Under an investment advisory and management agreement between us
and
Prospect
Capital Management, or the Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay
Prospect Capital Management investment advisory fees, which will consist of an
annual base management fee based on our gross assets, which we define as total
assets without deduction for any liabilities, as well as a two-part incentive
fee based on our performance.
The
Offering
We
may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, together or
separately, up to $500,000,000 of our Securities, which we expect to use
initially to maintain balance sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under
our credit facility, investment in high quality short-term debt instruments or a
combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term investments in accordance
with our investment objectives.
Our
Securities may be offered directly to one or more purchasers, through agents
designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers.
The prospectus supplement relating to a particular offering will disclose the
terms of that offering, including the name or names of any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities by us, the purchase price,
and any fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or
underwriters or among our underwriters, or the basis upon which such amount may
be calculated. See "Plan of Distribution." We may not sell any of our Securities
through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus
supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of our
Securities.
We
may sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common
stock, at a price below the current net asset value of our common stock upon
approval of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, in
certain circumstances. See "Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value" in this
prospectus and in the prospectus supplement, if applicable. Sales of common
stock at prices below net asset value per share dilute the interests of existing
stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net asset value per share and may
reduce our market price per share.
Set
forth below is additional information regarding the offering of our
Securities:
|
Use
of proceeds
|
Unless
otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend to use the net
proceeds from selling Securities pursuant to this prospectus initially to
maintain balance sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under our
credit facility, investments in high quality short-term debt instruments
or a combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term investments in
accordance with our investment objective. See "Use of
Proceeds."
|
|
Distributions
|
We
have paid quarterly distributions to the holders of our common stock and
generally intend to continue to do so. The amount of the quarterly
distributions is determined by our Board of Directors and is based on our
estimate of our investment company taxable income and net short-term
capital gains. Certain amounts of the quarterly distributions may from
time to time be paid out of our capital rather than from earnings for the
quarter as a result of our deliberate planning or accounting
reclassifications. Distributions in excess of our current or accumulated
earnings or profits constitute a return of capital and will reduce the
stockholder's adjusted tax basis in such stockholder's common stock. After
the adjusted basis is reduced to zero, these distributions will constitute
capital gains to such stockholders. Certain additional amounts may be
deemed as distributed to stockholders for income tax purposes. Other types
of Securities will likely pay distributions in accordance with their
terms. See "Price Range of Common Stock," "Distributions" and "Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations."
|
|
Taxation
|
We
have qualified and elected to be treated for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes as a regulated investment company, or a RIC, under Subchapter M
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code. As a RIC, we generally
do not have to pay corporate-level U.S. Federal income taxes on any
ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as
dividends. To maintain our qualification as a RIC and obtain RIC tax
treatment, we must maintain specified source-of-income and asset
diversification requirements and distribute annually at least 90% of our
ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of
realized net long-term capital losses, if any. See "Distributions" and
"Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations."
|
|
Dividend
reinvestment plan
|
We
have a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. This is an "opt
out" dividend reinvestment plan. As a result, when we declare a dividend,
the dividends are automatically reinvested in additional shares of our
common stock, unless a stockholder specifically "opts out" of the dividend
reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. Stockholders who
receive distributions in the form of stock are subject to the same U.S.
Federal, state and local tax consequences as stockholders who elect to
receive their distributions in cash. See "Dividend Reinvestment
Plan."
|
|
The
NASDAQ Global Select Market Symbol
|
PSEC
|
|
Anti-takeover
provisions
|
Our
charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and regulatory
requirements, contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging
a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These
anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances
that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize
a premium over the market price of our common stock. See "Description Of
Our Capital Stock."
|
|
Management
arrangements
|
Prospect
Capital Management serves as our investment adviser. Prospect
Administration serves as our administrator. For a description of Prospect
Capital Management, Prospect Administration and our contractual
arrangements with these companies, see "Management — Management Services —
Investment Advisory Agreement," and "Management — Management Services —
Administration Agreement."
|
|
Risk
factors
|
Investment
in our Securities involves certain risks relating to our structure and
investment objective that should be considered by prospective purchasers
of our Securities. In addition, investment in our Securities involves
certain risks relating to investing in the energy sector, including but
not limited to risks associated with commodity pricing, regulation,
production, demand, depletion and expiration, weather, and valuation. We
have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business.
In addition, as a business development company, our portfolio primarily
includes securities issued by privately-held companies. These investments
generally involve a high degree of business and financial risk, and are
less liquid than public securities. We are required to mark the carrying
value of our investments to fair value on a quarterly basis, and economic
events, market conditions and events affecting individual portfolio
companies can result in quarter-to-quarter mark-downs and mark-ups of the
value of individual investments that collectively can materially affect
our net asset value, or NAV. Also, our determinations of fair value of
privately-held securities may differ materially from the values that would
exist if there was a ready market for these investments. A large
number
|
|
|
of
entities compete for the same kind of investment opportunities as we do.
Moreover, our business requires a substantial amount of capital to operate
and to grow and we seek additional capital from external sources. In
addition, the failure to qualify as a RIC eligible for pass-through tax
treatment under the Code on income distributed to stockholders could have
a materially adverse effect on the total return, if any, obtainable from
an investment in our Securities. See "Risk Factors" and the other
information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you
should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our
Securities.
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
of distribution
|
We
may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of our common stock,
preferred stock, debt securities or rights to purchase shares of our
common stock, preferred stock or debt securities on the terms to be
determined at the time of the offering. Securities may be offered at
prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this
prospectus directly to one or more purchasers, through agents designated
from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The
supplement to this prospectus relating to the offering will identify any
agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will
set forth any applicable purchase price, fee and commission or discount
arrangement or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. We may
not sell Securities pursuant to this prospectus without delivering a
prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of
such Securities. For more information, see "Plan of
Distribution."
|
Fees
and Expenses
The
following tables are intended to assist you in understanding the costs and
expenses that an investor in this offering will bear directly or indirectly. We
caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are
estimates and may vary. In these tables, we assume that we have borrowed $195
million under our credit facility, which is the maximum amount available under
the credit facility. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this
prospectus contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by "you" or "us" or
that "we" will pay fees or expenses, the Company will pay such fees and expenses
out of our net assets and, consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees or
expenses as an investor in the Company. However, you will not be required to
deliver any money or otherwise bear personal liability or responsibility for
such fees or expenses.
|
Stockholder
transaction expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
load (as a percentage of offering price)(1)
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
Offering
expenses borne by us (as a percentage of offering
price)(2)
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
Dividend
reinvestment plan expenses(3)
|
|
None
|
|
|
Total
stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering
price)(4)
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
Annual
expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common
stock)(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
Fees(5)
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
Incentive
fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital
gains and 20% of pre-incentive fee net investment
income)(6)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
Interest
payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
|
Acquired
Fund Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
0.02
|
%(7)
|
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
1.99
|
%(8)
|
|
Total
annual expenses
|
|
|
8.89
|
%(6)(8)
|
Example
The
following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of cumulative expenses
we would pay out of net assets and that you would indirectly bear over various
periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In
calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed we would have
borrowed all $195 million available under our line of credit, that our annual
operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above and
that we would pay the costs shown in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You
would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5%
annual return
|
|
$
|
117.33
|
|
|
$
|
239.02
|
|
|
$
|
356.86
|
|
|
$
|
635.38
|
|
While
the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance
will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The income
incentive fee under our Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital
Management would be zero at the 5% annual return assumption, as required by the
SEC for this table, since no incentive fee is paid until the annual return
exceeds 7%. This illustration assumes that we will not realize any capital gains
computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation
in any of the indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an
incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors
after such expenses, would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes
reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at NAV, participants in our
dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock,
determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a
participant by the market price per share of our common stock at the close of
trading on the valuation date for the dividend. See "Dividend Reinvestment Plan"
for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment
plan.
This
example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a
representation of our future expenses. Actual expenses (including the cost of
debt, if any, and other expenses) may be greater or less than those
shown.
|
|
(1
|
)
|
In
the event that the Securities to which this prospectus relates are sold to
or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will
disclose the estimated applicable sales load.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
The
related prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated amount of
offering expenses, the offering price and the estimated offering expenses
borne by us as a percentage of the offering price.
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
The
expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in "other
expenses."
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
The
related prospectus supplement will disclose the offering price and the
total stockholder transaction expenses as a percentage of the offering
price.
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Our
base management fee is 2% of our gross assets (which include any amount
borrowed, i.e., total assets without deduction for any liabilities).
Although no plans are in place to borrow the full amount under our line of
credit, assuming that we borrowed $195 million, the 2% management fee of
gross assets equals approximately 2.74% of net assets. See "Management —
Management Services — Investment Advisory Agreement" and footnote 6
below.
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Th
e
incentive
fee payable to our Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisory
Agreement is based on our performance and will not be paid unless we
achieve certain goals. Under the assumption of a 5% return required in the
example, no incentive fee would be payable. For a more detailed discussion
of the calculation of the two-part incentive fee, see "Management —
Management Services — Investment Advisory Agreement."
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
The
Company's stockholders indirectly bear the expenses of underlying
investment companies in which the Company invests. This amount includes
the fees and expenses of investment companies in which the Company is
invested in as of December 31, 2009. When applicable, fees and expenses
are based on historic fees and expenses for the investment companies and
for those investment companies with little or no operating history, fees
and expenses are based on expected fees and expenses stated in the
investment companies' prospectus or other similar communication without
giving effect to any performance. Future fees and expenses for certain
investment companies may be substantially higher or lower because certain
fees and expenses are based on the performance of the investment
companies, which may fluctuate over time. The amount of the Company's
average net assets used in calculating this percentage was based on
average monthly net assets of approximately $637 million for the six
months ended December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
(
8
|
)
|
"Other
expenses" are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year. The
amount shown above represents annualized expenses during our six months
ended December 31, 2009 representing all of our estimated recurring
operating expenses (except fees and expenses reported in other items of
this table) that are deducted from our operating income and reflected as
expenses in our Statement of Operations. The estimate of our overhead
expenses, including payments under an administration agreement with
Prospect Administration, or the Administration Agreement, based on our
projected allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by
Prospect Administration in performing its obligations under the
Administration Agreement. "Other expenses" does not include non-recurring
expenses. See "Management — Management Services — Administration
Agreement."
|
SELECTED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
You
should read the condensed financial information below with the Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included in this prospectus. Financial information
below for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005
has been derived from the financial statements that were audited by our
independent registered public accounting firm. The selected consolidated
financial data at and for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 have
been derived from unaudited financial data, but in the opinion of our
management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the results for such interim
periods. Interim results at and for the six months ended December 31, 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending June 30, 2010. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior
period financial information to conform to the current period presentation. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" starting on page 27 for more information.
|
|
|
For
the Six Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
For
the Year/Period Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands except data relating to shares, per share and number of
portfolio companies)
|
|
|
Performance
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
33,374
|
|
|
$
|
34,797
|
|
|
$
|
62,926
|
|
|
$
|
59,033
|
|
|
$
|
30,084
|
|
|
$
|
13,268
|
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
Dividend
income
|
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
|
9,388
|
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
|
|
12,033
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
14,762
|
|
|
|
8,336
|
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Total
investment income
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
58,012
|
|
|
|
100,481
|
|
|
|
79,402
|
|
|
|
40,681
|
|
|
|
16,869
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
Interest
and credit facility expenses
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
|
|
(3,483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
|
|
(6,318
|
)
|
|
|
(1,903
|
)
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Investment
advisory expense
|
|
|
(13,696
|
)
|
|
|
(14,628
|
)
|
|
|
(26,705
|
)
|
|
|
(20,199
|
)
|
|
|
(11,226
|
)
|
|
|
(3,868
|
)
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
(4,092
|
)
|
|
|
(4,439
|
)
|
|
|
(8,452
|
)
|
|
|
(7,772
|
)
|
|
|
(4,421
|
)
|
|
|
(3,801
|
)
|
|
|
(3,874
|
)
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
(21,157
|
)
|
|
|
(22,550
|
)
|
|
|
(41,318
|
)
|
|
|
(34,289
|
)
|
|
|
(17,550
|
)
|
|
|
(8,311
|
)
|
|
|
(5,682
|
)
|
|
Net
investment income
|
|
|
29,243
|
|
|
|
35,462
|
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
45,113
|
|
|
|
23,131
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
Realized
and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
(52,474
|
)
|
|
|
(14,940
|
)
|
|
|
(24,059
|
)
|
|
|
(17,522
|
)
|
|
|
(6,403
|
)
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
|
|
6,340
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
Per
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets from operations(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
Distributions
declared per share
|
|
$
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
Average
weighted shares outstanding for the period
|
|
|
53,709,197
|
|
|
|
29,569,571
|
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
Assets
and Liabilities Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
648,135
|
|
|
$
|
555,661
|
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
$
|
497,530
|
|
|
$
|
328,222
|
|
|
$
|
133,969
|
|
|
$
|
55,030
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
40,945
|
|
|
|
32,316
|
|
|
|
119,857
|
|
|
|
44,248
|
|
|
|
48,280
|
|
|
|
4,511
|
|
|
|
48,879
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
689,080
|
|
|
|
587,977
|
|
|
|
667,025
|
|
|
|
541,778
|
|
|
|
376,502
|
|
|
|
138,480
|
|
|
|
103,909
|
|
|
Amount
drawn on credit facility
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
138,667
|
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
|
91,167
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Amount
owed to related parties
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
|
|
6,713
|
|
|
|
6,641
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
34,191
|
|
|
|
15,195
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
14,347
|
|
|
|
71,616
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
51,603
|
|
|
|
160,174
|
|
|
|
134,429
|
|
|
|
112,155
|
|
|
|
76,454
|
|
|
|
30,210
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
Net
assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
Investment
Activity Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No.
of portfolio companies at period end
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
(2)
|
|
|
24
|
(2)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
216,504
|
|
|
$
|
84,020
|
|
|
$
|
98,305
|
|
|
$
|
311,947
|
|
|
$
|
167,255
|
|
|
$
|
83,625
|
|
|
$
|
79,018
|
|
|
Sales,
repayments, and other disposals
|
|
$
|
69,735
|
|
|
$
|
13,077
|
|
|
$
|
27,007
|
|
|
$
|
127,212
|
|
|
$
|
38,407
|
|
|
$
|
9,954
|
|
|
$
|
32,083
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Yield at end of period(3)
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Per
share data is based on average weighted shares for the
period.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
a net profits interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading LLC ("Charlevoix"),
remaining after loan was paid.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
dividends from certain equity
investments.
|
RISK
FACTORS
Investing
in our Securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider
the risks described below, together with all of the other information included
in this prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in our
Securities. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face. If any of
the adverse events or conditions described below occur, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In
such case, our NAV, and the trading price of our common stock could decline, or
the value of our preferred stock, debt securities, and warrants, if any are
outstanding, may decline, and you may lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks
Relating To Our Business
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to
manage our future growth effectively.
Prospect
Capital Management has been registered as an investment adviser since March 31,
2004, and we have been organized as a closed-end investment company since April
13, 2004. Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability
to grow, which depends, in turn, on our Investment Adviser's ability to continue
to identify, analyze, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment
criteria. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a
function of our Investment Adviser's structuring of investments, its ability to
provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to
financing on acceptable terms. As we continue to grow, Prospect Capital
Management will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new
employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a
materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We
are dependent upon Prospect Capital Management's key management personnel for
our future success.
We
depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior
management of our Investment Adviser. We also depend, to a significant extent,
on our Investment Adviser's access to the investment professionals and the
information and deal flow generated by these investment professionals in the
course of their investment and portfolio management activities. The senior
management team of the Investment Adviser evaluates, negotiates, structures,
closes, monitors and services our investments. Our success depends to a
significant extent on the continued service of the senior management team,
particularly John F. Barry III and M. Grier Eliasek. The departure of any of the
senior management team could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to
achieve our investment objective. In addition, we can offer no assurance that
Prospect Capital Management will remain our investment adviser or that we will
continue to have access to its investment professionals or its information and
deal flow.
We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities.
A
large number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that
we make in target companies. We compete with other business development
companies, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks and
commercial financing companies. Additionally, because competition for investment
opportunities generally has increased among alternative investment vehicles,
such as hedge funds, those entities have begun to invest in areas they have not
traditionally invested in, including investments in middle-market companies. As
a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities at
middle-market companies has intensified, a trend we expect to
continue.
Many
of our existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do.
For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to
funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our
competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which
could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more
or fuller relationships with borrowers and sponsors than us. Furthermore, many
of
our
competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act
imposes on us as a business development company. We cannot assure you that the
competitive pressures we face will not have a materially adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of
existing and increasing competition and our competitors ability to provide a
total package solution, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive
investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that
we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our
investment objective.
We
do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates that we offer, and
we believe that some of our competitors make loans with interest rates that are
comparable to or lower than the rates we offer. We may lose investment
opportunities if we do not match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure.
If we match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure, we may experience
decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss.
Most
of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as determined in good
faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty as to the
value of our portfolio investments.
A
large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of securities of privately
held companies. Hence, market quotations are generally not readily available for
determining the fair values of such investments. The determination of fair
value, and thus the amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year, is to
a degree subjective, and the Investment Adviser has a conflict of interest in
making the determination. We value these securities quarterly at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based on input from our
Investment Adviser, a third party independent valuation firm and our audit
committee. Our Board of Directors utilizes the services of an independent
valuation firm to aid it in determining the fair value of any securities. The
types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair values of our
investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the
portfolio company's ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in
which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded
companies, discounted cash flow, current market interest rates and other
relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of
private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, the
valuations may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time due to changes
in current market conditions. The determinations of fair value by our Board of
Directors may differ materially from the values that would have been used if an
active market and market quotations existed for these investments. Our net asset
value could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value
of our investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately
realize upon the disposal of such securities.
Senior
securities, including debt, expose us to additional risks, including the typical
risks associated with leverage.
We
currently use our revolving credit facility to leverage our portfolio and we
expect in the future to borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks
and other lenders and may securitize certain of our portfolio
investments.
With
certain limited exceptions, as a BDC we are only allowed to borrow amounts such
that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after such
borrowing. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Investment
Adviser's and our Board of Directors' assessment of market conditions and other
factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. There is no assurance that a
leveraging strategy will be successful. Leverage involves risks and special
considerations for stockholders, including:
|
|
·
|
A
likelihood of greater volatility in the net asset value and market price
of our common stock;
|
|
|
·
|
Diminished
operating flexibility as a result of asset coverage or investment
portfolio composition requirements required by lenders or investors that
are more stringent than those imposed by the 1940
Act;
|
|
|
·
|
The
possibility that investments will have to be liquidated at less than full
value or at inopportune times to comply with debt covenants or to pay
interest or dividends on the leverage;
|
|
|
·
|
Increased
operating expenses due to the cost of leverage, including issuance and
servicing costs;
|
|
|
·
|
Convertible
or exchangeable securities issued in the future may have rights,
preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock;
and
|
|
|
·
|
Subordination
to lenders' superior claims on our assets as a result of which lenders
will be able to receive proceeds available in the case of our liquidation
before any proceeds are distributed to our
stockholders.
|
For
example, the amount we may borrow under our revolving credit facility is
determined, in part, by the fair value of our investments. If the fair value of
our investments declines, we may be forced to sell investments at a loss to
maintain compliance with our borrowing limits. Other debt facilities we may
enter into in the future may contain similar provisions. Any such forced sales
would reduce our net asset value and also make it difficult for the net asset
value to recover. Our Investment Adviser and our Board of Directors in their
best judgment nevertheless may determine to use leverage if they expect that the
benefits to our stockholders of maintaining the leveraged position will outweigh
the risks.
Illustration.
The
following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment
in our common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses. The
calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be
higher or lower than those appearing below. The calculation assumes
(i) $667 million in total assets, (ii) an average cost of funds
of 7.0%, (iii) $124.8 million in debt outstanding and (iv) $532.6
million of shareholders’ equity.
|
Assumed
Return on Our Portfolio (net of expenses)
|
-10%
|
-5%
|
0%
|
5%
|
10%
|
|
Corresponding
Return to Stockholder
|
(14.2)%
|
(7.9)%
|
(1.6)%
|
4.6%
|
10.9%
|
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment
income.
A
significant portion of the debt investments we make bears interest at fixed
rates and the value of these investments could be negatively affected by
increases in market interest rates. In addition, as the interest rate on our
revolving credit facility is at a variable rate based on an index, an increase
in interest rates would make it more expensive to use debt to finance our
investments. As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates could
both reduce the value of our portfolio investments and increase our cost of
capital, which would reduce our net investment income.
We
need to raise additional capital to grow because we must distribute most of our
income.
We
need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. A reduction in the
availability of new capital could limit our ability to grow. We must distribute
at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in
excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our shareholders to
maintain our RIC status. As a result, such earnings are not available to fund
investment originations. We have sought additional capital by borrowing from
financial institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity
securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from other sources
to fund our investments, we could be limited in our ability to grow, which may
have an adverse effect on the value of our common stock. In addition, as a
business development company, we are generally required to maintain a ratio of
total assets to total borrowings of at least 200%, which may restrict our
ability to borrow in certain circumstances.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We
generally make investments in private companies. Substantially all of these
securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are
otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our
investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need
arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our
portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we
have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other
restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to
the extent that we or our Investment Adviser has material non-public information
regarding such portfolio company.
We
may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We
could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number
of factors, including the interest or dividend rates payable on the debt or
equity securities we hold, the default rate on debt securities, the level of our
expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and
unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our
markets, the seasonality of the energy industry, weather patterns, changes in
energy prices and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors,
results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of
performance in future periods.
Our
most recent net asset value was calculated on December 31, 2009 and our NAV when
calculated effective March 31, 2010 may be higher or lower.
Our
most recently estimated NAV per share is $10.07 on an as adjusted basis solely
to give effect to our issuance of common shares on January 25, 2010 in
connection with our dividend reinvestment plan, versus $10.06 determined by us
as of December 31, 2009. NAV as of March 31, 2010 may be higher or lower than
$10.07 based on potential changes in valuations and earnings for the quarter
then ended. Our Board of Directors has not yet determined the fair value of
portfolio investments subsequent to December 31, 2009. Our Board of Directors
determines the fair value of our portfolio investments on a quarterly basis in
connection with the preparation of quarterly financial statements and based on
input from an independent valuation firm, our Investment Advisor and the audit
committee of
our
Board of Directors.
Potential
conflicts of interest could impact our investment returns.
Our
executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of our Investment
Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, may serve as officers, directors or
principals of entities that operate in the same or related lines of business as
we do or of investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they may
have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might
not be in our best interests or those of our stockholders. Nevertheless, it is
possible that new investment opportunities that meet our investment objective
may come to the attention of one of these entities in connection with another
investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such opportunity might not be
offered, or otherwise made available, to us. However, as an investment adviser,
Prospect Capital Management has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best
interests of its clients, including us. To that end, if Prospect Capital
Management or its affiliates manage any additional investment vehicles or client
accounts in the future, Prospect Capital Management will endeavor to allocate
investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner over time so as not to
discriminate unfairly against any client. If Prospect Capital Management chooses
to establish another investment fund in the future, when the investment
professionals of Prospect Capital Management identify an investment, they will
have to choose which investment fund should make the investment.
In
the course of our investing activities, under the Investment Advisory Agreement
we pay base management and incentive fees to Prospect Capital Management, and
reimburse Prospect Capital Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a
result of the Investment Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the senior
management team of Prospect Capital Management has interests that differ from
those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.
Prospect
Capital Management receives a quarterly income incentive fee based, in part, on
our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, for the immediately
preceding calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a fixed
quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive fee return to the
Investment Adviser. This fixed hurdle rate was determined when then current
interest rates were relatively low on a historical basis. Thus, if interest
rates rise, it would become easier for our investment income to exceed the
hurdle rate and, as a result, more likely that our Investment Adviser will
receive an income incentive fee than if interest rates on our investments
remained constant or decreased. Subject to the receipt of any requisite
stockholder approval under the 1940 Act, our Board of Directors may adjust the
hurdle rate by amending the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The
income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on income that may
include interest that has been accrued but not yet received in cash. If a
portfolio company defaults on a loan that has a deferred interest feature, it is
possible that interest accrued under such loan that has previously been included
in the calculation of the income incentive fee will become uncollectible. If
this happens, our Investment Adviser is not required to reimburse us for any
such income incentive fee payments. If we do not have sufficient liquid assets
to pay this incentive fee or distributions to stockholders on such accrued
income, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to do so. This fee
structure could give rise to a conflict of interest for our Investment Adviser
to the extent that it may encourage the Investment Adviser to favor debt
financings that provide for deferred interest, rather than current cash payments
of interest.
We
have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with Prospect Capital
Management. Under this agreement, Prospect Capital Management agrees to grant us
a non-exclusive license to use the name "Prospect Capital." Under the license
agreement, we have the right to use the "Prospect Capital" name for so long as
Prospect Capital Management or one of its affiliates remains our Investment
Adviser. In addition, we rent office space from Prospect Administration, an
affiliate of Prospect Capital Management, and pay Prospect Administration our
allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations as Administrator under the
Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs
of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective
staffs. This may create conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors
monitors.
Our
incentive fee could induce Prospect Capital Management to make speculative
investments.
The
incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management may create an
incentive for our Investment Adviser to make investments on our behalf that are
more speculative or involve more risk than would be the case in the absence of
such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable is
determined (calculated as a percentage of the return on invested capital) may
encourage the Investment Adviser to use leverage to increase the return on our
investments. Increased use of leverage and this increased risk of replacement of
that leverage at maturity, would increase the likelihood of default, which would
disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because the Investment Adviser
will receive an incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on
our investments, the Investment Adviser may invest more than would otherwise be
appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield capital gains, as
compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our
investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which
could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic
downturns.
The
incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management could create an
incentive for our Investment Adviser to invest on our behalf in instruments,
such as zero coupon bonds, that have a deferred interest feature. Under these
investments, we would accrue interest income over the life of the investment but
would not receive payments in cash on the investment until the end of the term.
Our net investment income used to calculate the income incentive fee, however,
includes accrued interest. For example, accrued interest, if any, on our
investments in zero coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our
incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest payments in
respect of payment on the bond until its maturity date. Thus, a portion of this
incentive fee would be based on income that we may not have yet received in cash
in the event of default may never receive.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our
business.
We
and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local,
state and U.S. Federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their
interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these
laws or regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our business. For
additional information regarding the regulations we are subject to, see
"Regulation."
Recent
developments may increase the risks associated with our business and an
investment in us.
The
U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high level of volatility,
disruption and distress, which was exacerbated by the failure of several major
financial institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the U.S.
economy has been in a recession , the aftermath of which may be severe and
prolonged. Similar conditions have occurred in the financial markets
and economies of numerous other countries and could worsen, both in the U.S. and
globally. These conditions have raised the level of many of the risks described
in this document and could have an adverse effect on our portfolio companies as
well as on our business, financial condition, results of operations, dividend
payments, credit facility, access to capital, valuation of our assets, NAV and
our stock price.
Risks
Relating To Our Operation As A Business Development Company
Our
Investment Adviser and its senior management team have limited experience
managing a business development company under the 1940 Act.
The
1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of business development
companies. For example, business development companies are, with narrow
exceptions, required to invest at least 70% of their total assets in securities
of certain privately held, thinly traded or distressed U.S. companies, cash,
cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less. Our Investment Adviser's and its
senior management team's limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets
under such constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of attractive
investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve our investment objective. In
addition, our investment strategies differ in some ways from those of other
investment funds that have been managed in the past by investment
professionals.
A
failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company
would significantly reduce our operating flexibility.
If
we do not continue to qualify as a business development company, we might be
regulated as a registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act; our
failure to qualify as a BDC would make us subject to additional regulatory
requirements, which may significantly decrease our operating flexibility by
limiting our ability to employ leverage.
If
we fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on our
income, and our income available for distribution would be reduced.
To
maintain our qualification for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under
Subchapter M of the Code, and obtain RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain
source of income, asset diversification and annual distribution
requirements.
The
source of income requirement is satisfied if we derive at least 90% of our
annual gross income from interest, dividends, payments with respect to certain
securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or
options thereon or foreign currencies, or other income derived with respect to
our business of investing in such securities or currencies, and net income from
interests in "qualified publicly traded partnerships," as defined in the
Code.
The
annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least
90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess
of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an
annual basis. Because we use debt financing, we are subject to certain asset
coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants that
could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions
necessary to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we are unable to obtain cash from
other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and, thus, may be
subject to corporate-level income tax.
To
maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset
diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to
meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain investments
quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our
investments are in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at
disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses.
If
we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason or become subject to corporate income
tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets,
the amount of income available for distribution, and the actual amount of our
distributions. Such a failure would have a materially adverse effect on us and
our stockholders. For additional information regarding asset coverage ratio and
RIC requirements, see "Regulation — Senior Securities" and "Material U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations".
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to
raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital.
We
have incurred indebtedness under our revolving credit facility and, in the
future, may issue preferred stock and/or borrow additional money from banks or
other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as "senior
securities," up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the
provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to incur indebtedness or
issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined
in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities.
If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test,
which would prohibit us from paying dividends and could prohibit us from
qualifying as a RIC. If we cannot satisfy this test, we may be required to sell
a portion of our investments or sell additional shares of common stock at a time
when such sales may be disadvantageous in order to repay a portion of our
indebtedness. In addition, issuance of additional common stock could dilute the
percentage ownership of our current stockholders in us.
As
a BDC regulated under provisions of the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to
issue and sell our common stock at a price below the current net asset value per
share. If our common stock trades at a discount to net asset value, this
restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise capital. We may,
however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our
common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of our common stock
in certain circumstances, including if (i)(1) the holders of a majority of our
shares (or, if less, at least 67% of a quorum consisting of a majority of our
shares) and a similar majority of the holders of our shares who are not
affiliated persons of us approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is
less than the current net asset value, and (2) a majority of our Directors who
have no financial interest in the transaction and a majority of our independent
Directors (a) determine that such sale is in our and our stockholders' best
interests and (b) in consultation with any underwriter or underwriters of the
offering, make a good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior
to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase
such shares, or immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price
at which such shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely
approximates the market value of such shares, less any distributing commission
or discount or if (ii) a majority of the number of the beneficial holders of our
common stock entitled to vote at our annual meeting, without regard to whether a
majority of such shares are voted in favor of the proposal, approve the sale of
our common stock at a price that is less than the current net asset value per
share. At our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on February 12, 2009, and
our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, we obtained
the first method of approval from our shareholders. See "If we sell
common stock at a discount to our net asset value per share, stockholders who do
not participate in such sale will experience immediate dilution in an amount
that may be material" discussed below.
To
generate cash for funding new investments, we pledged a substantial portion of
our portfolio investments under our revolving credit facility. These assets are
not available to secure other sources of funding or for securitization. Our
ability to obtain additional secured or unsecured financing on attractive terms
in the future is uncertain.
Alternatively,
we may securitize our future loans to generate cash for funding new investments.
To securitize loans, we may create a wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a
pool of loans to such subsidiary. This could include the sale of interests in
the loans by the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers who we would
expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest in investment
grade loan pools. We would retain a portion of the equity in the securitized
pool of loans. An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could
limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our business strategy,
and could decrease our earnings, if any. Moreover, the successful securitization
of our loan portfolio exposes us to a risk of loss for the equity we retain in
the securitized pool of loans and might expose us to losses because the residual
loans in which we do not sell interests may tend to be those that are riskier
and more likely to generate losses. A successful securitization may also impose
financial and operating covenants that restrict our business activities and may
include limitations that could hinder our ability to finance additional loans
and investments or to make the distributions required to maintain our status as
a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The 1940 Act may also impose restrictions
on the structure of any securitizations.
Our
common stock may trade at a discount to our net asset value per
share.
Common
stock of BDCs, like that of closed-end investment companies, frequently trades
at a discount to current net asset value, which could adversely affect the
ability to raise capital. In the past, our common stock has traded at a discount
to our net asset value. However, we have been able to periodically
raise capital pursuant to authority granted by our stockholders at our 2008 and
2009 annual meetings to sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock
at any level of discount from net asset value during the 12 month period
following such approval. The risk that our common stock may continue to trade at
a discount to our net asset value is separate and distinct from the risk that
our net asset value per share may decline.
If
we sell common stock at a discount to our net asset value per share,
stockholders who do not participate in such sale will experience immediate
dilution in an amount that may be material.
At
our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our
stockholders approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of our
common stock at any level of discount from net asset value per share during the
12 month period following the December 11, 2009 approval in accordance with the
exception described above in "— Regulations governing our operation as a
business development company affect our ability to raise, and the way in which
we raise, additional capital." The issuance or sale by us of shares of our
common stock at a discount to net asset value poses a risk of dilution to our
stockholders. In particular, stockholders who do not purchase additional shares
at or below the discounted price in proportion to their current ownership will
experience an immediate decrease in net asset value per share (as well as in the
aggregate net asset value of their shares if they do not participate at all).
These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately greater decrease in
their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than the
increase we experience in our assets, potential earning power and voting
interests from such issuance or sale. They may also experience a reduction in
the market price of our common stock. For additional information and
hypothetical examples of these risks, see "Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset
Value" and the prospectus supplement pursuant to which such sale is
made.
We
may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income
before or without receiving cash representing such income.
For
U.S. Federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain amounts that we
have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise
if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in
other circumstances, or payment-in-kind interest, which represents contractual
interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such
original issue discount, which could be significant relative
to
our overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as a result of
payment-in-kind arrangements, are included in our taxable income before we
receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in
taxable income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash. While we
focus primarily on investments that will generate a current cash return, our
investment portfolio currently includes, and we may continue to invest in,
securities that do not pay some or all of their return in periodic current cash
distributions.
The
income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on income that may
include interest that has been accrued but not yet received in cash. If a
portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued
interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the
calculation of the income incentive fee will become uncollectible.
Since
in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or without receiving cash
representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the tax requirement to
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to
maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our
investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt
or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these
distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources,
we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus become subject to
corporate-level income tax. See "Regulation — Senior Securities" and "Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations".
Our
ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is
restricted.
We
are prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain
transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent
directors. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our
outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act and
we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security or other
property from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent
directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits "joint" transactions with an affiliate,
which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the
same or different times), without prior approval of our independent directors.
We are prohibited from buying or selling any security or other property from or
to our Investment Adviser and its affiliates and persons with whom we are in a
control relationship, or entering into joint transactions with any such person,
absent the prior approval of the SEC.
The
Company may be unable to realize the benefits anticipated by the merger with
Patriot or may take longer than anticipated to achieve such
benefits.
On
December 2, 2009, we completed our previously announced acquisition of Patriot
under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2009, by and
among, us and Patriot. The realization of certain benefits
anticipated as a result of the merger will depend in part on the integration of
Patriot's investment portfolio with the Company and the successful inclusion of
Patriot's investment portfolio in the Company's financing operations. There can
be no assurance that Patriot's business can be operated profitably or integrated
successfully into the Company's operations in a timely fashion or at all. The
dedication of management resources to such integration may detract attention
from the day-to-day business of the Company and there can be no assurance that
there will not be substantial costs associated with the transition process or
that there will not be other material adverse effects as a result of these
integration efforts. Such effects, including but not limited to, incurring
unexpected costs or delays in connection with such integration and failure of
Patriot's investment portfolio to perform as expected, could have a material
adverse effect on the financial results of the Company.
Risks
Relating To Our Investments
We
may not realize gains or income from our investments.
We
seek to generate both current income and capital appreciation. However, the
securities we invest in may not appreciate and, in fact, may decline in value,
and the issuers of debt securities we invest in may default on interest and/or
principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our
investments, and any gains that we do realize may not be sufficient to offset
any losses we experience. See "Business — Our Investment Objective and
Policies".
Our
portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies,
particularly those in the energy industry, which subject us to a risk of
significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any
of the securities that we hold or if the energy industry experiences a
downturn.
As
of February 25, 2010, we had invested in a number of companies in the energy and
energy related industries. A consequence of this lack of diversification is that
the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly and adversely affected if
a small number of such investments perform poorly or if we need to write down
the value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax diversification
requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our
investments are concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. In addition,
to date we have concentrated on making investments in the energy industry. While
we expect to be less focused on the energy and energy related industries in the
future, we anticipate that we will continue to have significant holdings in the
energy and energy related industries. As a result, a downturn in the energy
industry could materially and adversely affect us.
The
energy industry is subject to many risks.
We
have a significant concentration in the energy industry. Our definition of
energy, as used in the context of the energy industry, is broad, and different
sectors in the energy industry may be subject to variable risks and economic
pressures. As a result, it is difficult to anticipate the impact of changing
economic and political conditions on our portfolio companies and, as a result,
our financial results. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of energy
companies can fluctuate suddenly and dramatically due to any one or more of the
following factors:
|
|
·
|
Commodity Pricing
Risk
. Energy companies in general are directly affected
by energy commodity prices, such as the market prices of crude oil,
natural gas and wholesale electricity, especially for those that own the
underlying energy commodity. In addition, the volatility of commodity
prices can affect other energy companies due to the impact of prices on
the volume of commodities transported, processed, stored or distributed
and on the cost of fuel for power generation companies. The volatility of
commodity prices can also affect energy companies' ability to access the
capital markets in light of market perception that their performance may
be directly tied to commodity prices. Historically, energy commodity
prices have been cyclical and exhibited significant volatility. Although
we generally prefer risk controls, including appropriate commodity and
other hedges, by certain of our portfolio companies, if available, some of
our portfolio companies may not engage in hedging transactions to minimize
their exposure to commodity price risk. For those companies that engage in
such hedging transactions, they remain subject to market risks, including
market liquidity and counterparty creditworthiness. In addition, such
companies may also still have exposure to market prices if such companies
do not produce volumes or other contractual obligations in accordance with
such hedging contracts.
|
|
|
·
|
Regulatory
Risk
. The profitability of energy companies could be
adversely affected by changes in the regulatory environment. The
businesses of energy companies are heavily regulated by federal, state and
local governments in diverse ways, such as the way in which energy assets
are constructed, maintained and operated and the prices energy companies
may charge for their products and services. Such regulation can change
over time in scope and intensity. For example, a particular by-product of
an energy process may be declared hazardous by a regulatory agency, which
can unexpectedly increase production costs. Moreover, many state and
federal environmental laws provide for civil penalties as well as
regulatory remediation, thus adding to the potential liability an energy
company may face. In addition, the deregulation of energy markets and the
unresolved regulatory issues related to
some
|
|
|
|
power
markets such as California create uncertainty in the regulatory
environment as rules and regulations may be adopted on a transitional
basis. We cannot assure you that the deregulation of energy markets will
continue and if it continues, whether its impact on energy companies'
profitability will be positive.
|
|
|
·
|
Production
Risk
. The profitability of energy companies may be
materially impacted by the volume of crude oil, natural gas or other
energy commodities available for transporting, processing, storing,
distributing or power generation. A significant decrease in the production
of natural gas, crude oil, coal or other energy commodities, due to the
decline of production from existing facilities, import supply disruption,
depressed commodity prices, political events, OPEC actions or otherwise,
could reduce revenue and operating income or increase operating costs of
energy companies and, therefore, their ability to pay debt or
dividends.
|
|
|
·
|
Demand
Risk
. A sustained decline in demand for crude oil,
natural gas, refined petroleum products and electricity could materially
affect revenues and cash flows of energy companies. Factors that could
lead to a decrease in market demand include a recession or other adverse
economic conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying
commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that increase costs,
or a shift in consumer demand for such products.
|
|
|
·
|
Depletion and Exploration
Risk
. A portion of any one energy company's assets may
be dedicated to natural gas, crude oil and/or coal reserves and other
commodities that naturally deplete over time. Depletion could have a
materially adverse impact on such company's ability to maintain its
revenue. Further, estimates of energy reserves may not be accurate and,
even if accurate, reserves may not be fully utilized at reasonable costs.
Exploration of energy resources, especially of oil and gas, is inherently
risky and requires large amounts of capital.
|
|
|
·
|
Weather
Risk
. Unseasonable extreme weather patterns could result
in significant volatility in demand for energy and power. In addition,
hurricanes, storms, tornados, floods, rain, and other significant weather
events could disrupt supply and other operations at our portfolio
companies as well as customers or suppliers to such companies. This
volatility may create fluctuations in earnings of energy
companies.
|
|
|
·
|
Operational
Risk
. Energy companies are subject to various
operational risks, such as failed drilling or well development,
unscheduled outages, underestimated cost projections, unanticipated
operation and maintenance expenses, failure to obtain the necessary
permits to operate and failure of third-party contractors (for example,
energy producers and shippers) to perform their contractual obligations.
In addition, energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing cash
flow, including increasing utilization of existing facilities, expanding
operations through new construction, expanding operations through
acquisitions, or securing additional long-term contracts. Thus, some
energy companies may be subject to construction risk, acquisition risk or
other risk factors arising from their specific business
strategies.
|
|
|
·
|
Competition
Risk
. The progress in deregulating energy markets has
created more competition in the energy industry. This competition is
reflected in risks associated with marketing and selling energy in the
evolving energy market and a competitor's development of a lower-cost
energy or power source, or of a lower cost means of operations, and other
risks arising from competition.
|
|
|
·
|
Valuation
Risk
. Since mid-2001, excess power generation capacity
in certain regions of the United States has caused substantial decreases
in the market capitalization of many energy companies. While such prices
have recovered to some extent, we can offer no assurance that such
decreases in market capitalization will not recur, or that any future
decreases in energy company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary
in nature.
|
|
|
·
|
Terrorism
Risk
. Since the September 11th attacks, the United
States government has issued public warnings indicating that energy
assets, specifically those related to pipeline infrastructure, production
facilities and transmission and distribution facilities, might be specific
targets of terrorist activity.
The
|
|
|
|
continued
threat of terrorism and related military activity will likely increase
volatility for prices of natural gas and oil and could affect the market
for products and services of energy companies. In addition, any future
terrorist attack or armed conflict in the United States or elsewhere may
undermine economic conditions in the United States in
general.
|
|
|
·
|
Financing
Risk
. Some of our portfolio companies rely on the
capital markets to raise money to pay their existing obligations. Their
ability to access the capital markets on attractive terms or at all may be
affected by any of the risks associated with energy companies described
above, by general economic and market conditions or by other factors. This
may in turn affect their ability to satisfy their obligations with
us.
|
|
|
·
|
Climate
Change.
There is evidence of global
climate change.
Climate change
creates physical and financial
risk
and some of our portfolio companies may be adversely affected by climate
change. For example, customers of energy companies needs vary
with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity. To
the extent weather conditions are affected by
climate change, energy use could
increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any
changes. Increased energy use due to weather changes may
require additional investments by our portfolio companies in more
pipelines and other infrastructure to serve increased demand. A
decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect our portfolio
companies financial condition, through decreased
revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more
system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system
stresses, including service interruptions. Energy companies
could also be affected by the potential for lawsuits against or taxes or
other regulatory costs imposed on greenhouse gas emitters, based on links
drawn between greenhouse gas emissions and
climate
change.
|
Our
investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky and we could lose
all or part of our investment.
Some
of our portfolio companies have relatively short or no operating histories.
These companies are and will be subject to all of the business risk and
uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including the risk
that these companies may not reach their investment objective and the value of
our investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
In
addition, investment in the middle market companies that we are targeting
involves a number of other significant risks, including:
|
|
·
|
these
companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet
their obligations under their securities that we hold, which may be
accompanied by a deterioration in the value of their securities or of any
collateral with respect to any securities and a reduction in the
likelihood of our realizing on any guarantees we may have obtained in
connection with our investment;
|
|
|
·
|
they
may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller
market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more
vulnerable to competitors' actions and market conditions, as well as
general economic downturns;
|
|
|
·
|
because
many of these companies are privately held companies, public information
is generally not available about these companies. As a result, we will
depend on the ability of our Investment Adviser to obtain adequate
information to evaluate these companies in making investment decisions. If
our Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information about
these companies, it may not make a fully informed investment decision, and
we may lose money on our investments;
|
|
|
·
|
they
are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small
group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or
termination of one or more of these persons could have a materially
adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us;
|
|
|
·
|
they
may have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be
parties to litigation, may be engaged in changing businesses with products
subject to a risk of obsolescence and may require substantial additional
capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their
competitive position;
|
|
|
·
|
they
may have difficulty accessing the capital markets to meet future capital
needs; and
|
|
|
·
|
increased
taxes, regulatory expense or the costs of changes to the way they conduct
business due to the effects of climate change may adversely affect their
business, financial structure or
prospects.
|
In
addition, our executive officers, directors and our Investment Adviser could, in
the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising
from proposed investments or from our investments in the portfolio
companies.
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our
operating results.
The
U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high level of volatility,
disruption and distress, which was exacerbated by the failure of several major
financial institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the U.S.
economy has been in a recession , the aftermath of which may be severe and
prolonged. Similar conditions have occurred in the financial markets
and economies of numerous other countries and could worsen, both in the U.S. and
globally. Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by the
conditions and overall strength of the national, regional and local economies,
including interest rate fluctuations, changes in the capital markets and changes
in the prices of their primary commodities and products. These factors also
impact the amount of residential, industrial and commercial growth in the energy
industry. Additionally, these factors could adversely impact the customer base
and customer collections of our portfolio companies.
As
a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic
slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans or meet other
obligations during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets are
likely to increase, and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during
these periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of
collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments.
Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio
and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic
conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the
capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us.
These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating
results.
A
portfolio company's failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed
by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of
its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company's
ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity securities that we
hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon
default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain
financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if one of
our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have structured
our interest as senior debt or preferred equity, depending on the facts and
circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided managerial
assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize
our debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to
those of other creditors.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We
make investments in private companies. A portion of these investments may be
subject to legal and other restrictions on resale, transfer, pledge or other
disposition or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities.
The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such
investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all
or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than
the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we
face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a business
entity to the extent that we or our Investment Adviser has or could be deemed to
have material non-public information regarding such business
entity.
We
may have limited access to information about privately held companies in which
we invest.
We
invest primarily in privately-held companies. Generally, little public
information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on the
ability of our Investment Adviser's investment professionals to obtain adequate
information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies.
These companies and their financial information are not subject to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies. If we are
unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not
make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our
investment.
We
may not be in a position to control a portfolio investment when we are a debt or
minority equity investor and its management may make decisions that could
decrease the value of our investment.
We
make both debt and minority equity investments in portfolio companies. As a
result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business
decisions with which we disagree, and the management of such company, as
representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or
otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests. As a result, a portfolio
company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio
holdings.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally
with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
We
may invest in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity securities issued by our
portfolio companies. Our portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted
to incur, other debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with,
or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms, such
instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of
dividends, interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled
to receive payments in respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in
the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy
of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment
in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full
before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying
the senior security holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining
assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of securities
ranking equally with securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an
equal basis any distributions with other security holders in the event of an
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the
relevant portfolio company.
We
may not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral securing our debt
investments.
Although
a substantial amount of our debt investments are protected by holding security
interests in the assets of the portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully
realize the value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or more
of the following factors:
|
|
·
|
our
debt investments are primarily made in the form of mezzanine loans,
therefore our liens on the collateral, if any, are subordinated to those
of the senior secured debt of the portfolio companies, if any. As a
result, we may not be able to control remedies with respect to the
collateral;
|
|
|
·
|
the
collateral may not be valuable enough to satisfy all of the obligations
under our secured loan, particularly after giving effect to the repayment
of secured debt of the portfolio company that ranks senior to our
loan;
|
|
|
·
|
bankruptcy
laws may limit our ability to realize value from the collateral and may
delay the realization process;
|
|
|
·
|
our
rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the failure to
perfect security interests in the
collateral;
|
|
|
·
|
the
need to obtain regulatory and contractual consents could impair or impede
how effectively the collateral would be liquidated and could affect the
value received; and
|
|
|
·
|
some
or all of the collateral may be illiquid and may have no readily
ascertainable market value. The liquidity and value of the collateral
could be impaired as a result of changing economic conditions,
competition, and other factors, including the availability of suitable
buyers.
|
Our
investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to
the risks inherent in U.S. investments.
Our
investment strategy contemplates potential investments in securities of foreign
companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not
typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include
changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less
available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher
transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and
issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price
volatility.
Although
currently most of our investments are, and we expect that most of our
investments will be, U.S. dollar-denominated, investments that are denominated
in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular
currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the
factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of
short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in
different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital
appreciation, and political developments.
We
may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.
We
may employ hedging techniques to minimize certain investment risks, such as
fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, but we can offer no
assurance that such strategies will be effective. If we engage in hedging
transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such
transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency
options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge
against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from
changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging against a
decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the
possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if
the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other
positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the
decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may
also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio positions
should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange
rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are
not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable
price.
The
success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability to correctly predict
movements, currencies and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into
such transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate
risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may
result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in
any such hedging transactions. The degree of correlation between price movements
of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the
portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons,
we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging
instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect
correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to
risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly
against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in
non-U.S. currencies.
Our
Board of Directors may change our operating policies and strategies without
prior notice or stockholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse to us
and could impair the value of our stockholders' investment.
Our
Board of Directors has the authority to modify or waive our current operating
policies and our strategies without prior notice and without stockholder
approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating
policies and strategies would have on our business, financial condition, and
value of our common stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could
negatively impact our ability to pay dividends and cause stockholders to lose
all or part of their investment.
Risks
Relating To Our Securities
Investing
in our securities may involve a high degree of risk.
The
investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a
higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and volatility or loss
of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and
aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not be suitable for
someone with low risk tolerance.
The
market price of our securities may fluctuate significantly.
The
market price and liquidity of the market for our securities may be significantly
affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not
be directly related to our operating performance. These factors
include:
|
|
·
|
significant
volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of
business development companies or other companies in the energy industry,
which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of these
companies;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to
RICs or business development companies;
|
|
|
·
|
loss
of RIC qualification;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
·
|
any
shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels
expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
·
|
departure
of one or more of Prospect Capital Management's key
personnel;
|
|
|
·
|
operating
performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
·
|
changes
in prevailing interest rates;
|
|
|
·
|
litigation
matters;
|
|
|
·
|
general
economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
·
|
loss
of a major funding source.
|
Sales
of substantial amounts of our securities in the public market may have an
adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
As
of February 25, 2010, we have 63,586,731 shares of common stock outstanding.
Sales of substantial amounts of our securities or the availability of such
securities for sale could adversely affect the prevailing market price for our
securities. If this occurs and continues it could impair our ability to raise
additional capital through the sale of securities should we desire to do
so.
There
is a risk that you may not receive distributions or that our distributions may
not grow over time.
We
have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a quarterly basis to
our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. We cannot
assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that
will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year
increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to the asset coverage test
applicable to us as a business development company, we may be limited in our
ability to make distributions.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could
deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common
stock.
Our
charter and bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law contain provisions
that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a
change in control that might involve a premium price for our stockholders or
otherwise be in their best interest. These provisions may prevent shareholders
from being able to sell shares of its common stock at a premium over the current
of prevailing market prices.
Our
charter provides for the classification of our Board of Directors into three
classes of directors, serving staggered three-year terms, which may render a
change of control or removal of our incumbent management more difficult.
Furthermore, any and all vacancies on our Board of Directors will be filled
generally only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors
in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any
director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term
until a successor is elected and qualifies.
Our
Board of Directors is authorized to create and issue new series of shares, to
classify or reclassify any unissued shares of stock into one or more classes or
series, including preferred stock and, without stockholder approval, to amend
our charter to increase or decrease the number of shares of common stock that we
have authority to issue, which could have the effect of diluting a stockholder's
ownership interest. Prior to the issuance of shares of common stock of each
class or series, including any reclassified series, our Board of Directors is
required by our governing documents to set the terms, preferences, conversion or
other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each
class or series of shares of stock.
Our
charter and bylaws also provide that our Board of Directors has the exclusive
power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of our bylaws, and to make new
bylaws. The Maryland General Corporation Law also contains certain provisions
that may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, such
as:
|
|
·
|
The
Maryland Business Combination Act, which, subject to certain limitations,
prohibits certain business combinations between us and an "interested
stockholder" (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or
more of the voting power of the common stock or an affiliate thereof) for
five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an
interested stockholder and, thereafter, imposes special minimum price
provisions and special stockholder voting requirements on these
combinations; and
|
|
|
·
|
The
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, which provides that "control
shares" of a Maryland corporation (defined as shares of common stock
which, when aggregated with other shares of common stock controlled by the
stockholder, entitles the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing
ranges of voting power in electing directors, as described more fully
below) acquired in a "control share acquisition" (defined as the direct or
indirect acquisition of ownership or control of "control shares") have no
voting rights except to the extent approved by stockholders by the
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares of common
stock.
|
The
provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act will not apply, however, if
our Board of Directors adopts a resolution that any business combination between
us and any other person will be exempt from the provisions of the Maryland
Business Combination Act. Although our Board of Directors has adopted such a
resolution, there can be no assurance that this resolution will not be altered
or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If the resolution is altered or
repealed, the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act may discourage
others from trying to acquire control of us.
As
permitted by Maryland law, our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of
our common stock. Although our bylaws include such a provision, such a provision
may also be amended or eliminated by our Board of Directors at any time in the
future, provided that we will notify the Division of Investment Management at
the SEC prior to amending or eliminating this provision.
We
may in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which case our
shareholders may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash they
receive.
We
may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in part in our stock. Under
IRS Revenue Procedure 2010-12, which extended and modified Revenue
Procedure 2009-15, up to 90% of any such taxable dividend for 2009, 2010, and
2011 could be payable in our stock. The IRS has also issued (and where Revenue
Procedure 2009-15 or 2010-12 is not currently applicable, the IRS continues to
issue) private letter rulings on cash/stock dividends paid by regulated
investment companies and real estate investment trusts using a 20% cash standard
(instead of the 10% cash standard of Revenue Procedures 2009-15 and 2010-12) if
certain requirements are satisfied. Taxable stockholders receiving such
dividends would be required to include the full amount of the dividend as
ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is
properly designated as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of its current and
accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal income tax purposes.
As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such
dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock
it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, it may be subject to
transaction fees (e.g. broker fees or transfer agent fees) and the sales
proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the
dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale.
Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be
required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in
respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock. In
addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares
of its stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward
pressure on the trading price of our stock. It is unclear whether and to what
extent we will be able to pay dividends in cash and our stock (whether pursuant
to Revenue Procedure 2009-15 or 2010-12, a private letter ruling, or
otherwise.
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(All
figures in this section are in thousands except share, per share and other
data)
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements
and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and
other parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking information that involves
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed
under “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” appearing elsewhere
herein.
Note
on Forward Looking Statements
Some
of the statements in this report constitute forward-looking statements, which
relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The
forward-looking statements contained herein involve risks and uncertainties,
including statements as to:
|
|
·
|
our
future operating results;
|
|
|
·
|
our
business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio
companies;
|
|
|
·
|
the
impact of investments that we expect to make;
|
|
|
·
|
our
contractual arrangements and relationships with third
parties;
|
|
|
·
|
the
dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on
the industries in which we invest;
|
|
|
·
|
the
ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their
objectives;
|
|
|
·
|
our
expected financings and investments;
|
|
|
·
|
the
adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and
|
|
|
·
|
the
timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio
companies.
|
We
generally use words such as "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "intends" and
similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results
could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements
for any reason, including the factors set forth in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere
in this prospectus.
These forward-looking
statements do not meet the safe harbor for forward-looking statements pursuant
to Section 27A of the Securities Act.
We
have based the forward-looking statements included herein on information
available to us on the date of this document, and we assume no obligation to
update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation
to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any
additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that
we in the future may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"),
including any annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and
current reports on Form 8-K.
General
We
are a financial services company that primarily lends to and invests in middle
market privately-held companies. We are a closed-end investment company that has
filed an election to be treated as a business development company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. We invest primarily in senior
and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project financing and
recapitalization. We work with the management teams or financial sponsors to
seek investments with historical cash flows, asset collateral or contracted
pro-forma cash flows.
We
seek to be a long-term investor with our portfolio companies. Since the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2007, we have invested primarily in industries related to
the industrial/energy economy. Since then, we have widened our strategy to focus
in other sectors of the economy and continue to diversify our portfolio
holdings.
Patriot
Acquisition
On
December 2, 2009, we acquired the outstanding shares of Patriot Capital Funding,
Inc. ("Patriot") common stock for $201,083. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, Patriot common shareholders received 0.363992 shares of our common
stock for each share of Patriot common stock, resulting in 8,444,068 shares of
common stock being issued by us. In connection with the transaction, we repaid
all the outstanding borrowings of Patriot, in compliance with the merger
agreement.
On
December 2, 2009, Patriot made a final dividend equal to its undistributed net
ordinary income and capital gains of $0.38 per share. In accordance with a
recent IRS revenue procedure, the dividend was paid 10% in cash and 90% in newly
issued shares of Patriot's common stock. The exchange ratio was adjusted to give
effect to the tax distribution.
The
merger has been accounted for as an acquisition of Patriot by Prospect Capital
Corporation ("Prospect") in accordance with acquisition method of accounting as
detailed in ASC 805,
Business
Combinations
("ASC 805"). The fair value of the consideration paid was
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair
values as the date of acquisition. As described in more detail in ASC 805,
goodwill, if any, would have been recognized as of the acquisition date, if the
consideration transferred exceeded the fair value of identifiable net assets
acquired. As of the acquisition date, the fair value of the identifiable net
assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the consideration transferred, and we
recognized the excess as a gain. A gain of $5,714 was recorded by Prospect in
the quarter ended December 31, 2009 related to the acquisition of Patriot. The
acquisition of Patriot was negotiated in July 2009 with the purchase agreement
being signed on August 3, 2009. Between July 2009 and December 2, 2009, our
valuation of certain of the investments acquired from Patriot increased due to
market improvement, which resulted in the recognition of the gain at
closing.
The
purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values as summarized in the following
table:
|
Cash
(to repay Patriot debt)
|
|
$
|
107,313
|
|
|
Cash
(to fund purchase of restricted stock from former Patriot
employees)
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
Common
stock issued
(1)
|
|
|
92,800
|
|
|
Total
purchase price
|
|
|
201,083
|
|
|
Assets
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
(2)
|
|
|
207,126
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
Assets
acquired
|
|
|
212,682
|
|
|
Other
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
Net
assets acquired
|
|
|
206,797
|
|
|
Preliminary
gain on Patriot acquisition
(3)
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
value of the shares of common stock exchanged with the Patriot common
shareholders was based upon the closing price of our common stock on
December 2, 2009, the price immediately prior to the closing of the
transaction.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The
fair value of Patriot's investments were determined by the Board of
Directors in conjunction with an independent valuation agent. This
valuation resulted in a purchase price which was $98,150 below the
amortized cost of such investments. For those assets which are performing,
Prospect will record the accretion to par value in interest income over
the remaining term of the investment.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The
preliminary gain has been determined based upon the estimated value of
certain liabilities which are not yet settled. Any changes to such
accruals will be recoded in future periods as an adjustment to such gain.
We do not believe such adjustments will be
material.
|
During
the period from the acquisition of Patriot on December 2, 2009 to December 31,
2009, we recognized $7,495 of interest income from the assets acquired from
Patriot. Included in this amount is $4,560 resulting from the acceleration of
purchase discounts from the early repayments of three loans, three revolving
lines of credit and the sale of one investment position.
Market
Conditions
In
2008 and 2009, the financial services industry has been negatively affected by
turmoil in the global capital markets. What began in 2007 as a deterioration of
credit quality in subprime residential mortgages has spread rapidly to other
credit markets. Market liquidity and credit quality conditions continue to
remain weaker today than two years ago.
We
believe that Prospect Capital is well positioned to navigate through these
adverse market conditions. As a business development company, we are limited to
a maximum 1 to 1 debt to equity ratio, and as of December 31, 2009, we had
$62,914 available under our credit facility, of which $10,000 was outstanding.
In addition, we had $105,050 of eligible assets from the Patriot acquisition in
the process of being pledged to the facility which will generate an additional
$67,086 of availability. Further, as we make additional investments that are
eligible to be pledged under the credit facility, we will generate additional
availability. The revolving period for the extended credit facility continues
until June 25, 2010, with an amortization running to June 25, 2011.
We
also continue to generate liquidity through public and private stock offerings.
On July 7, 2009 we completed a public stock offering for 5,175,000 shares of our
common stock at $9.00 per share, raising $46,575 of gross proceeds. On August
20, 2009 and September 24, 2009, we issued 3,449,686 shares and 2,807,111
shares, respectively, of our common stock at $8.50 and $9.00 per share,
respectively, in private stock offerings, raising $29,322, and $25,264 of gross
proceeds, respectively. Concurrent with the sale of these shares, we entered
into a registration rights agreement in which we granted the purchasers certain
registration rights with respect to the shares. Under the terms and conditions
of the registration rights agreement, we filed with the SEC a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement on Form N-2 on November 6, 2009. Such
amendment was declared effective by the SEC on November 9, 2009.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the economic
environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining
these estimates could cause actual results to differ.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Changes in the economic environment,
financial markets and any other parameters used in determining such estimates
could cause actual results to differ materially. In addition to the discussion
below, our critical accounting policies are further described in the notes to
the financial statements.
Basis
of Consolidation
Under
the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X, and
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Audit and Accounting
Guide for Investment Companies, we are precluded from consolidating any entity
other than another investment company or an operating company which provides
substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009 financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of
Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, our only wholly-owned, closely-managed subsidiary
that is also an investment company. All intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investment
Classification
We
are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. We classify
our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control
investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a
controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is
generally deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has the
right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial ownership of 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and
affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed
to exist through the possession outright or via the right to acquire within 60
days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting
securities of another person.
Investments
are recognized when we assume an obligation to acquire a financial instrument
and assume the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument. Investments
are derecognized when we assume an obligation to sell a financial instrument and
forego the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument. Specifically,
we record all security transactions on a trade date basis. Investments in other,
non-security financial instruments are recorded on the basis of subscription
date or redemption date, as applicable. Amounts for investments recognized or
derecognized but not yet settled are reported as Receivables for investments
sold and Payables for investments purchased, respectively, in the Consolidated
Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Investment
Valuation
Our
Board of Directors has established procedures for the valuation of our
investment portfolio. These procedures are detailed below.
Investments
for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market
quotations.
For
most of our investments, market quotations are not available. With respect to
investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such
market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of Directors
has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described
below:
1)
Each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our investment professionals
with the independent valuation firm engaged by our Board of
Directors;
2)
the independent valuation firm conducts independent appraisals and makes their
own independent assessment;
3)
the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews and discusses the
preliminary valuation of our Investment Adviser and that of the independent
valuation firm; and
4)
the Board of Directors discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of
each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of our
Investment Adviser, the independent valuation firm and the audit
committee.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC" or "Codification") 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures
("ASC 820"). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. We adopted ASC 820 on a prospective basis beginning in the
quarter ended September 30, 2008.
ASC
820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following
hierarchy:
Level 1
:
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible
by the Company at the measurement date.
Level 2
:
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level
3
:
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
In
all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to each
investment.
The
changes to generally accepted accounting principles from the application of ASC
820 relate to the definition of fair value, framework for measuring fair value,
and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to
fair value measurements already required or permitted by other
standards.
In
accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of our investments is defined as the
price that we would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction
to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market in which
that investment is transacted.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820-10-65,
Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
("ASC
820-10-65"). This update provides further clarification for ASC 820 in markets
that are not active and provides additional guidance for determining when the
volume of trading level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. ASC 820-10-65 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10-65 for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009, did not have any effect on our net asset value,
financial position or results of operations as there was no change to the fair
value measurement principles set forth in ASC 820.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements
("ASC 2010-06"). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820-10 and clarifies
and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and
non-recurring fair value measurements and employers' disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Our management does
not believe that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC 820-10 will have a
significant effect on our financial statements.
Federal
and State Income Taxes
We
have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company and intend to
continue to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(the "Code"), applicable to regulated investment companies. We are required to
distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend to
distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of our investment
company taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore, we have
made no provision for income taxes. The character of income and gains that we
will distribute is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to stockholder
dividends and distributions and other permanent book and tax differences are
reclassified to paid-in capital.
If
we do not distribute (or are not deemed to have distributed) at least 98% of our
annual taxable income in the calendar year earned, we will generally be required
to pay an excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our annual
taxable income exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for the year.
To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year annual taxable
income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions from
such taxable income, we accrue excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable
income as taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax rate.
The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by dividing the estimated
annual excise tax by the estimated annual taxable income.
We
adopted FASB ASC 740,
Income
Taxes
("ASC 740"). ASC 740 provides guidance for how uncertain tax
positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the
financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in the course of preparing our tax returns to determine
whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the
applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the
more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the
current year. Adoption of ASC 740 was applied to all open tax years as of July
1, 2007. The adoption of ASC 740 did not have an effect on our net asset value,
financial condition or results of operations as there was no liability for
unrecognized tax benefits and no change to our beginning net asset value. As of
December 31, 2009 and for the three and six months then ended, we did not have a
liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. Management's determinations
regarding ASC 740 may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based
upon factors including, but not limited to, an on-going analysis of tax laws,
regulations and interpretations thereof.
Revenue
Recognition
Realized
gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific
identification method.
Interest
income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is
recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, closing and/or commitment fees
associated with investments in portfolio companies are accreted into interest
income over the respective terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of
a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as interest
income.
Loans
are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past
due 90 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest
will be collected. Unpaid accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is
placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans
may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management's
judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due
principal and interest is paid and in management's judgment, are likely to
remain current. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 5.7% of our net assets
are in non-accrual status.
Dividend
income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Structuring
fees and similar fees are recognized as income as earned, usually when paid.
Structuring fees, excess deal deposits, net profits interests and overriding
royalty interests are included in other income.
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities Overview
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, net assets have increased by $104,881
from $532,596 as of June 30, 2009 to $637,477 as of December 31, 2009. This net
increase in assets primarily resulted from $195,833 of capital share
transactions including 8,444,068 of shares issued in conjunction with the
Patriot Acquisition, offset by $67,721 in dividends declared to our
stockholders. During this six month period we recognized net investment income
of $29,243, a decrease in net assets due to realized losses of $51,229 and a
decrease in net assets due to changes in unrealized depreciation of investments
of $1,245.
The
aggregate fair value of our portfolio investments was $648,135 and $547,168 as
of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. During the six months
ended December 31, 2009, our net cost of investments increased by $102,212, or
19.2%, primarily from the acquisition of Patriot. At December 31, 2009, we were
invested in 55 long-term portfolio investments.
Investment
Activity
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, we acquired $207,126 of investments from
Patriot, completed follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies
totaling approximately $7,321, and recorded PIK interest of $2,059, resulting in
gross investment originations with a cost basis of $216,506. The more
significant of these investments are described briefly in the
following:
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, we made follow-on secured debt
investments of $1,423 in Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. ("Iron Horse") in
support of the build out of additional equipment and to fund working capital
requirements.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, we provided additional fundings of
$3,376 to Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc. ("Yatesville") to fund ongoing
operations.
On
October 5, 2009 we purchased an additional secured debt investment of $1,675 in
Resco Products, Inc. ("Resco") at a discount of $670, increasing our cost basis
by $1,005 in this investment.
On
October 30, 2009, we made a follow-on secured subordinated debt investment of
$500 in Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine ("Ajax").
On
December 2, 2009, we acquired portfolio investments with a face amount of
$289,030 for $207,126 from Patriot.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, we closed-out six positions which are
briefly described below.
On
August 31, 2009, C&J Cladding, LLC ("C&J") repaid the $3,150 loan
receivable to us and we received an additional 5% prepayment penalty totaling
$158. We continue to hold warrants for common units in this
investment.
On
September 4, 2009, Peerless Manufacturing Co. repaid the $20,000 loan receivable
to us.
On
December 4, 2009, CS Operating, LLC repaid the $4,460 loan receivable to
us.
On
December 10, 2009, Resco repaid the $11,425 loan receivable to us.
On
December 17, 2009, ADAPCO, Inc. ("ADAPCO") repaid the $7,466 loan receivable to
us. We continue to hold warrants for common stock in this
investment.
On
December 18, 2009, Quartermaster, Inc. ("Quartermaster") repaid the $11,274 loan
receivable to us.
On
December 31, 2009, we sold our investment in Aylward Enterprises, LLC
("Aylward") for net amount of $4,775.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, we also received principal amortization
payments of $7,184 on several loans.
On
September 30, 2008, we settled our net profits interests ("NPIs") in IEC Systems
LP ("IEC") and Advanced Rig Services LLC ("ARS") with the companies for a
combined $12,576. IEC and ARS originally issued the NPIs to us when we loaned a
combined $25,600 to IEC and ARS on November 20, 2007. In conjunction with the
NPI realization, we recognized other income of $12,576 simultaneously reinvested
the $12,576 as incremental senior secured debt in IEC and ARS. The incremental
debt will amortize over the period ending November 20, 2010.
The
following is a quarter-by-quarter summary of our investment
activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
$
|
210,438
|
|
|
$
|
45,494
|
|
|
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
6,066
|
|
|
|
24,241
|
|
|
June
30, 2009
|
|
|
7,929
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
6,356
|
|
|
|
10,782
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
70,456
|
|
|
|
10,949
|
|
|
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
118,913
|
|
|
|
61,148
|
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
31,794
|
|
|
|
28,891
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
120,846
|
|
|
|
19,223
|
|
|
September
30, 2007
|
|
|
40,394
|
|
|
|
17,949
|
|
|
June
30, 2007
|
|
|
130,345
|
|
|
|
9,857
|
|
|
March
31, 2007
|
|
|
19,701
|
|
|
|
7,731
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
62,679
|
|
|
|
17,796
|
|
|
September
30, 2006
|
|
|
24,677
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
June
30, 2006
|
|
|
42,783
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
March
31, 2006
|
|
|
15,732
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
December
31, 2005
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
|
|
25,342
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
June
30, 2005
|
|
|
17,544
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
|
|
23,771
|
|
|
|
32,083
|
|
|
September
30, 2004
|
|
|
30,371
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Since
inception
|
|
$
|
1,027,033
|
|
|
$
|
304,377
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
new deals, additional fundings, refinancings and PIK
interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
scheduled principal payments, prepayments and
refinancings.
|
Investment
Holdings
As
of December 31, 2009, we continue to pursue our investment strategy. Despite our
name change to "Prospect Capital Corporation" and the termination of our policy
to invest at least 80% of our net assets in energy companies in May 2007, we
currently have a concentration of investments in companies in the energy and
energy related industries. This concentration continues to decrease as we make
investments outside of the energy and energy related industries. Some of the
companies in which we invest have relatively short or no operating histories.
These companies are and will be subject to all of the business risk and
uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including the risk
that these companies may not reach their investment objective or the value of
our investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
Our
portfolio had an annualized current yield of 15.6% and 16.0% across all our
long-term debt and certain equity investments as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2009, this yield includes
interest from all of our long-term investments as well as dividends from Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc. ("GSHI") and NRG Manufacturing, Inc. ("NRG"). We expect
the current yield to decline over time as add to the portfolio. Monetization of
other equity positions that we hold is not included in this yield calculation.
In each of our portfolio companies, we hold equity positions, ranging from
minority interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to contribute
to our investment returns. Some of these equity positions include features such
as contractual minimum internal rates of returns, preferred distributions, flip
structures and other features expected to generate additional investment
returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over junior equity,
in addition to the yield and security offered by our cash flow and collateral
debt protections.
We
classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act,
control investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a
controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is
generally deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has the
right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial ownership of 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and
affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed
to exist through the possession outright or via the right to acquire within 60
days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting
securities of another person.
As
of December 31, 2009, we own controlling interests in Ajax, AWCNC, LLC, C&J,
Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. ("CCEHI"), Coalbed, Inc./Coalbed, LLC
(formerly Conquest Cherokee, LLC) ("Coalbed"), Fischbein, LLC ("Fischbein"),
Freedom Marine Services LLC ("Freedom Marine"), GSHI, Integrated Contract
Services, Inc. ("ICS"), Iron Horse, NRG, Nupla Corporation ("Nupla"), R-V
Industries, Inc. ("R-V"), Sidump'r Trailer Company, Inc. ("Sidump'r") and
Yatesville. We also own an affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings,
LLC ("AEH"), Biotronic NeuroNetwork ("Biotronic"), Boxercraft Incorporated
("Boxercraft"), KTPS Holdings, LLC ("KTPS"), Miller Petroleum, Inc. ("Miller"),
Smart, LLC ("Smart") and Sport Helmets Holdings, LLC ("Sport
Helmets").
The
following is a summary of our investment portfolio by level of
control:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
$
|
165,867
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
187,105
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
68,052
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
|
|
|
399,717
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
|
|
389,758
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
%
|
|
|
310,775
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
%
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The
following is our investment portfolio presented by type of investment at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
$
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
Revolving
Line of Credit
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt
|
|
|
306,009
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
|
|
281,321
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
|
232,534
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
|
220,993
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
Secured Debt
|
|
|
272,320
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
239,968
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
251,292
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
194,547
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
Unsecured Debt
|
|
|
15,185
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|
|
11,484
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
10,432
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,139
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
18,713
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
82,213
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
16,310
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
89,278
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
Membership
Interests
|
|
|
5,124
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
7,270
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
Overriding
Royalty Interests
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Net
Profit Interests
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
7,243
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
8,566
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The
following is our investment portfolio presented by geographic location of the
investment at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
$
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Midwest
US
|
|
|
115,332
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
122,125
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
77,681
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
84,097
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
Northeast
US
|
|
|
61,171
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
53,823
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
44,875
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
47,049
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
Southeast
US
|
|
|
189,313
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
152,209
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
164,652
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
101,710
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
Southwest
US
|
|
|
183,428
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
245,792
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
178,993
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
%
|
|
|
253,615
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
Western
US
|
|
|
63,675
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
61,868
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
45,879
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
48,091
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
Total
Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The
following is our investment portfolio presented by industry sector of the
investment at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace
and Defense
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Biomass
Power
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Construction
Services
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Contracting
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
Ecological
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Electronics
|
|
|
14,910
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
14,994
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Financial
Services
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
Food
Products
|
|
|
34,634
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
37,412
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
27,413
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
29,416
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
Gas
Gathering and Processing
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
|
88,217
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
92,253
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
57,535
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
60,293
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
Home
and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Machinery
|
|
|
26,952
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
27,088
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
80,590
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
83,112
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
90,978
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
110,929
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
Metal
Services and Minerals
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
12,180
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
Mining,
Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal Production
|
|
|
10,527
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
10,705
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
48,890
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
104,469
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
93,904
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
104,183
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
104,806
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
Oilfield
Fabrication
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
34,247
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
34,931
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
Personal
and Nondurable Consumer Products
|
|
|
28,705
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
28,845
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Printing
and Publishing
|
|
|
7,640
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
7,803
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Production
Services
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
14,670
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
Shipping
Vessels
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
Specialty
Minerals
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
17,806
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
Technical
Services
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Textiles
and Leather
|
|
|
20,171
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
19,566
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
Total
Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Investment
Valuation
In
determining the fair value of our portfolio investments at December 31, 2009,
the Audit Committee considered valuations from the independent valuation firm
and from management having an aggregate range of $604,614 to $680,622, excluding
money market investments.
In
determining the range of value for debt instruments, management and the
independent valuation firm generally shadow rated the investment and then based
upon the range of ratings, determined appropriate yields to maturity for a loan
rated as such. A discounted cash flow analysis was then prepared using the
appropriate yield to maturity as the discount rate, yielding the ranges. For
equity investments, the enterprise value was determined by applying EBITDA
multiples for similar recent investment sales. For stressed equity investments,
a liquidation analysis was prepared.
The
Board of Directors looked at several factors in determining where within the
range to value the asset including: recent operating and financial trends for
the asset, independent ratings obtained from third parties and comparable
multiples for recent sales of companies within the industry. The composite of
all these analysis, applied to each investment, was a total valuation of
$648,135, excluding money market investments.
Our
investments are generally lower middle market companies, outside of the
financial sector, with less than $30,000 of annual EBITDA. We believe our market
has experienced less volatility than others because we believe there are more
buy and hold investors who own these less liquid investments.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, there has been a general improvement in
the markets in which we operate and market rates of interest demanded for middle
market loans have decreased. The fair value is limited on the high side to the
loans par value, plus any prepayment penalties that would be imposed. Many of
the debt investments in this category have not seen a significant change in
value as they were previously valued at or near par value. In comparison to
assets held as of June 30, 2009, these assets include: American Gilsonite
Company, Biotronic, Castro Cheese Company, Inc., IEC/ARS, Maverick Healthcare,
LLC, Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Regional Management Corp., Shearer's
Foods, Inc., Stryker Energy, LLC, TriZetto Group and Unitek. Such assets
acquired from Patriot include: Aircraft Fasteners International, LLC,
Boxercraft, Copernicus Group, EXL Acquisition Corp., Fairchild Industrial
Products Co., Hudson Products Holdings, Inc., KTPS, Label Corp Holdings, Inc.,
LHC Holdings Corp., Northwestern Management Services LLC, R-O-M Corporation and
Sport Helmets.
Nine
debt investments were made to companies that are not performing in line with
budget expectations as of December 31, 2009 and have seen a diminution of value
since June 30, 2009 (Ajax, Coalbed, Deb Shops, Inc., H&M Oil & Gas, LLC,
Iron Horse, NRG, R-V, Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp. and
Yatesville). The valuation of these assets is further stressed by declining
market demand within their respective industries, primarily retail, industrial
and energy-related. For these assets, we have increased the market interest
rates to take into account the increased credit risk, illiquidity and general
changes in current interest rates for similar assets to determine their fair
value.
Five
portfolio companies (ADAPCO, C&J, Diamondback, Miller and R-V) are equity
investments for which the previously outstanding debt has been
repaid.
Control
investments offer increased risk and reward over straight debt investments.
Operating results and changes in market multiples can result in dramatic changes
in values from quarter to quarter. Significant downturns in operations can
further result in our looking to recoveries on sales of assets rather than the
enterprise value of the investment. Several control investments in our portfolio
are under enhanced scrutiny by our senior management and our Board of Directors
and are discussed below.
Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine, Inc.
We
acquired a controlling equity interest in Ajax in a recapitalization of the
company that was closed on April 4, 2008. We funded $22,000 of senior secured
term debt, $11,500 of subordinated term debt and $6,300 of equity as of that
closing. As of December 31, 2009, we control 78.1% of the fully-diluted common
and preferred equity.
Ajax
forges seamless steel rings sold to various customers. The rings are used in a
range of industrial applications, including in construction equipment and wind
power turbines. Ajax's business is cyclical, and the business suffered in light
of the global macroeconomic crisis of the past several quarters. 2008 was
relatively strong for Ajax, but in the first half of 2009, Ajax experienced
massive cuts in ordering of steel rings by its key customers. The second half of
2009 showed steady improvement versus very weak performance in the first half of
the year and despite improvement in the second half of the year, Ajax's overall
performance in 2009 was well below that of 2008. At December 31, 2009, Ajax had
a backlog of new business that would indicate continued improvement through
2010.
The
Board of Directors wrote-down the fair value of our investment in Ajax to
$25,802 as of December 31, 2009, a reduction of $14,059 from its amortized cost,
compared to the $7,581 unrealized loss recorded at June 30, 2009.
Change
Clean Energy Holdings Inc. and Change Clean Energy, Inc., f/k/a Worcester Energy
Partners, Inc.
Change
Clean Energy, Inc. ("CCEI") is an investment that we originated in September
2005 which owns and operated a bio-mass energy plant. In March 2009 CCEI ceased
operations temporarily as it was not economically feasible to make a profit
based on the cost of materials and the price being paid for electricity. During
that quarter, we determined that it was appropriate to institute foreclosure
proceedings against the co-borrowers of our debt to take full control of the
assets. In anticipation of such proceedings CCEHI was established and on March
11, 2009, the foreclosure was completed and the assets were assigned to a wholly
owned subsidiary of CCEHI. During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we
provided additional funding of $296 to CCEHI to fund ongoing operations. CCEI
currently has no material operations. At June 30, 2009 we determined that the
impairment at both CCEI and CCEHI was other than temporary and recognized a
realized loss of $41,134, which was the amount by which the amortized cost
exceeded the fair value. At December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors, under
recommendation from senior management, has set the value of the CCEHI investment
at $1,976, a reduction of $849 from its amortized cost.
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.
GSHI
is an investment that we made in September 2004 in which we own 100% of the
equity. GSHI is a midstream gathering and processing business located in East
Texas. GSHI has improved its operations and we have experienced an increase in
revenue, gross margin, and EBITDA (the later two metrics on both an absolute and
a percentage of revenues basis) over the past five years.
During
the past two years, we have been in discussions with multiple interested
purchasers for Gas Solutions. While we wish to unlock the value in Gas
Solutions, we do not wish to enter into any agreement at any time that does not
recognize the long term value we see in Gas Solutions. As a well hedged
midstream asset, which will generate predictable and consistent cash flows to
us, Gas Solutions is a valuable asset that we wish to sell at a value-maximizing
price, or not at all. We continue discussions with interested parties, but have
a patient approach toward the process. In addition, a sale of the assets, rather
than the stock of GSHI, might result in a significant tax liability at the GSHI
level which will need to be paid prior to any distribution to us.
In
early May 2008, Gas Solutions II Ltd purchased a series of propane puts at $0.10
out of the money and at prices of $1.53 per gallon and $1.394 per gallon
covering the periods May 1, 2008, through April 30, 2009, and May 1, 2009,
through April 30, 2010, respectively. These hedges were executed at close to the
highest market propane prices ever achieved on an historical basis; such hedges
preserve the upside of Gas Solutions II Ltd to benefit from potential future
increases in commodity prices. GSHI generated approximately $26,172 of EBITDA
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, an increase of 67% from 2007
results. Despite the volatility in commodity prices over the last year, GSHI
generated approximately $25,816 of EBITDA for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2009.
In
determining the value of GSHI, we have utilized several valuation techniques to
determine the value of the investment. These techniques offer a wide range of
values. Our Board of Directors has determined the value to be $85,187 for our
debt and equity positions at December 31, 2009 based upon a combination of a
discounted cash flow analysis and a public comparables analysis. At December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009, GSHI was valued $50,184 above its amortized
cost.
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.
ICS
is an investment that we made in April 2007. Prior to January 2009, ICS owned
the assets of ESA Environmental Specialists, Inc. ("ESA") and 100% of the stock
of The Healing Staff ("THS"). ESA originally defaulted under our contract
governing our investment in ESA, prompting us to commence foreclosure actions
with respect to certain ESA assets in respect of which we have a priority lien.
In response to our actions, ESA filed voluntarily for reorganization under the
bankruptcy code on August 1, 2007. On September 20, 2007, the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court approved a Section 363 Asset Sale from ESA to us. To complete this
transaction, we contributed
our
ESA debt to a newly-formed entity, ICS, and provided funds for working capital
on October 9, 2007. In return for the ESA debt, we received senior secured debt
in ICS of equal amount to our ESA debt, preferred stock of ICS, and 49% of the
ICS common stock. ICS subsequently ceased operations and assigned the collateral
back to us. ICS is in default of both payment and financial covenants. During
September and October 2007, we provided $1,170 to THS for working
capital.
In
January 2009, we foreclosed on the real and personal property of ICS. Through
this foreclosure process, we gained 100% ownership of THS and certain ESA
assets. Based upon an analysis of the liquidation value of the ESA assets and
the enterprise value of THS, our Board of Directors affirmed the fair value of
our investment in ICS at $5,275 at December 31, 2009, a reduction of $11,377
from its amortized cost, compared to the $11,652 unrealized loss recorded at
June 30, 2009.
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
Iron
Horse is an investment that we made in April 2006. Iron Horse had been a
provider of coiled tubing subcontractor services prior to making a strategic
decision in late 2007 to directly service natural gas and oil producers in the
Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin ("WCSB") as a fracturing services provider.
As a result of the business transition, the Company's 2008 financial performance
declined significantly from 2007 levels. Iron Horse completed its transition
from a subcontractor to a direct service provider in 2009, but natural gas
prices fell to trough levels due to the recession and heightened natural gas
inventory levels. Since November 2009, Iron Horse has seen increased activity in
the WCSB and is now completing wells for several large producers in the
WCSB.
Prior
to December 31, 2007, we owned 8.5% of the common stock in Iron Horse. On
December 31, 2007, we received an additional 50.3% of the common stock in Iron
Horse, which increased our total ownership to 58.8%. Through a series of
subsequent loans that were used to construct equipment and facilitate the
transition from a subcontractor to a direct service provider, we secured an
additional 21.0% of the common stock in Iron Horse in September 2008, which
increased our total ownership to 79.8% of the common stock in Iron
Horse.
The
Board of Directors wrote-down the fair value of our investment in Iron Horse to
$12,318 as of December 31, 2009, a reduction of $8,399 from its amortized cost,
compared to the $6,738 unrealized loss recorded at June 30, 2009.
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.
All
of our coal holdings have been consolidated under common management in
Yatesville. Yatesville began to show improvement after the consolidation of the
coal holdings, but the company exhausted its permitted reserves in December 2008
and has not had any meaningful revenue stream since. We continue to evaluate
strategies for Yatesville such as soliciting indications of interest regarding a
transaction involving part or all of recoverable reserves. During the six months
ended December 31, 2009, we provided additional funding of $3,376 to Yatesville
to fund ongoing operations including new permitting. During the quarter, we
discontinued operations at Yatesville. As of December 31, 2009, our Board of
Directors determined that consistent with the decision to discontinue
operations, the impairment of Yatesville was other than temporary and we
recorded a realized loss of $51,228 which was the amount that the amortized cost
exceeded the fair value at December 31, 2009. Our Board of Directors set the
value of the remaining Yatesville investment at $1,035, which represents the
residual value of recoverable reserves, as of December 31, 2009, a reduction of
$12,062 from its value as of June 30, 2009.
Capitalization
Our
investment activities are capital intensive and the availability and cost of
capital is a critical component of our business. We capitalize our business with
a combination of debt and equity. Our debt currently consists of a
revolving
credit facility availing us of the ability to borrow debt subject to borrowing
base determinations and our equity capital is currently comprised entirely of
common equity.
On
June 25, 2009, we completed a first closing on an expanded $250,000 syndicated
revolving credit facility (the "Facility"). The new Facility, for which six
lenders have closed on $210,000 to date, includes an accordion feature which
allows the Facility to accept up to an aggregate total of $250,000 of
commitments for which we continue to solicit additional commitments from other
lenders for the additional $40,000. The revolving period of the Facility extends
through June 2010, with an additional one year amortization period after the
completion of the revolving period. As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009,
we had $10,000 and $124,800 of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility,
respectively.
Interest
on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month Libor plus 400 basis
points, subject to a minimum Libor floor of 200 basis points after that date.
The maintenance of this facility requires us to pay a fee for the amount not
drawn upon. This fee assessed at the rate of 100 basis points per annum. The
following table shows the facility amounts and outstanding borrowings at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
124,800
|
|
The
following table shows the contractual maturity of our revolving credit facility
at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
Payments
Due By Period
|
|
|
|
Less
Than
1
Year
|
|
|
1
- 3 Years
|
|
More
Than
3
Years
|
|
Credit
Facility Payable
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, we completed public and private
offerings and raised $97,675 of additional equity by issuing 11,431,797 shares
of our common stock below net asset value diluting shareholder value by $0.75
per share. We also issued 8,444,068 shares to acquire Patriot increasing net
asset value to shareholders by $0.03 per share. The following table shows the
calculation of net asset value per share as of December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009:
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
As
of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Net
Assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
Shares
of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
Net
asset value per share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
At
December 31, 2009, we had 63,349,746 of our common stock issued and
outstanding.
Results
of Operations
For
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations was ($16,853) and
$6,524, respectively, representing ($0.29) and $0.22 per share, respectively. We
experienced a net realized and unrealized loss of $33,778 or approximately $0.59
per share in the three months ended December 31, 2009. This compares with the
net realized and unrealized loss of $5,436 during the three months ended
December 31, 2008 or approximately $0.18 per share.
For
the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the net (decrease)
increase in net assets resulting from operations was ($23,231) and $20,522,
respectively, representing ($0.43) and $0.69 per share, respectively. We
experienced a net realized and unrealized loss of $52,474 or approximately $0.98
per share in the six months ended December 31, 2009. This compares with the net
realized and unrealized loss of $14,940 during the six months ended December 31,
2008 or approximately $0.51 per share.
While
we seek to maximize gains and minimize losses, our investments in portfolio
companies can expose our capital to risks greater than those we may anticipate
as these companies are typically not issuing securities rated investment grade,
have limited resources, have limited operating history, are generally private
companies with limited operating information available and are likely to depend
on a small core of management talents. Changes in any of these factors can have
a significant impact on the value of the portfolio company.
Investment
Income
We
generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt securities that we
own, dividend income on any common or preferred stock that we own, and amortized
loan origination fees on the structuring of new deals. Our investments, if in
the form of debt securities, will typically have a term of one to ten years and
bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the extent achievable, we will
seek to collateralize our investments by obtaining security interests in our
portfolio companies' assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity
interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or in-kind dividends on
a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis. In addition, we may generate revenue
in other forms including prepayment penalties and possibly consulting fees. Any
such fees generated in connection with our investments are recognized as
earned.
Investment
income consists of interest income, including accretion of loan origination fees
and prepayment penalty fees, dividend income and other income, including net
profits interest, overriding royalties interest and structuring fees. The
following table details the various components of investment income and the
related levels of debt investments for the three months ended December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
For
The Three Months Ended
December
31,
|
|
|
For
The Six Months Ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
18,539
|
|
|
$
|
17,241
|
|
|
$
|
33,374
|
|
|
$
|
34,797
|
|
|
Dividend
income
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
|
9,388
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
Total
investment income
|
|
$
|
28,883
|
|
|
$
|
22,213
|
|
|
$
|
50,400
|
|
|
$
|
58,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
debt principal of investments
|
|
$
|
571,809
|
|
|
$
|
537,101
|
|
|
$
|
535,069
|
|
|
$
|
517,421
|
|
|
Weighted-average
interest rate earned
|
|
|
12.86
|
%
|
|
|
12.74
|
%
|
|
|
12.37
|
%
|
|
|
13.34
|
%
|
Total
investment income increased significantly from $22,213 for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 to $28,883 for the six months ended December 31, 2009.
This $6,670 increase is primarily due to the Patriot acquisition, for which we
recognized a gain from the acquisition of $5,714 and purchase discount accretion
of $5,320 during the three months ended December 31, 2009. The discount
accretion includes $4,560 of accelerated accretion from early repayments of
ADAPCO, Quartermaster and Aylward. Total investment income has decreased for the
six months ended December 31, 2009 from the amount reported for the six months
ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to a decrease in other income. This $7,189
decrease in other income is primarily due to the settlement of our net profit
interests in IEC/ARS for $12,576 during the six months ended December 31, 2008,
partially offset but gain from the acquisition of Patriot.
Average
principal balances of debt investments have increased from $537,101 for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 to $571,809 for the three months ended
December 31, 2009. For the six months ended December 31, 2008
and
2009, average principal balances of debt investments increased from $517,421 to
$535,069, respectively. These increases are primarily due to the Patriot
acquisition which resulted in an additional $289,030 of debt principal to our
portfolio.
The
weighted-average interest rate earned increased from 12.74% for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 to 12.86% for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
This increase is primarily the result of purchase discount accretion of $5,320
from the Patriot acquisition. For the six months ended December 31, 2008 and
2009, weighted-average interest rate earned decreased from 13.34% to 12.37%,
respectively. This decrease is primarily the result of Patriot acquisition
purchase discount accretion, offset by foregone interest on non-accrual loans.
During the six month period ended December 31, 2009, interest of $12,510 was
foregone on non-accrual debt investments compared to $4,983 of forgone interest
for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Without adjustments for foregone
interest and purchase discount accretion from the Patriot acquisition, the
weighted average interest rates earned on debt investments would have been 15.0%
and 15.3% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Operating
Expenses
Our
primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory fees (base management
and income incentive fees), credit facility costs, legal and professional fees
and other operating and overhead-related expenses. These expenses include our
allocable portion of overhead under the Administration Agreement with Prospect
Administration under which Prospect Administration provides administrative
services and facilities for us. Our investment advisory fees compensate our
Investment Adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing
and monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses of our
operations and transactions in accordance with our Administration Agreement with
Prospect Administration. Operating expenses were $11,958 and $10,253 for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Operating expenses were $21,157 and $22,550 for the six months ended December
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The
base management fee was $3,176 and $2,940 for the three months ended December
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The base management fee was $6,385
and $5,763 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The increase in this expense for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 is directly related to our growth in total
assets.
For
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we incurred
$4,231 and $2,990, respectively, of income incentive fees. The $1,241 increase
in the income incentive fee for the respective three-month period is driven by
an increase in pre-incentive fee net investment income from $14,950 for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 to $21,156 for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, primarily the result of additional investment income from the
Patriot acquisition. For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, we incurred $7,311 and $8,865, respectively, of income incentive fees. The
$1,554 decrease in the income incentive fee for the respective six-month period
is driven by a decrease in pre-incentive fee net investment income from $44,327
for the six months ended December 31, 2008 to $36,554 for the six months ended
December 31, 2009, primarily the result of the settlement of net profits
interest in IEC/ARS in the 2008 period offset by the income from the Patriot
acquisition. No capital gains incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to
the Investment Advisory Agreement.
During
the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, we incurred $1,995 and $3,369
of expenses related to our credit facility. This compares with expenses of
$1,965 and $3,483 incurred during the three and six months ended December 31,
2008. These expenses are related directly to the leveraging capacity put into
place for each of those periods and the levels of indebtedness actually
undertaken during those quarters. The table below describes the various credit
facility expenses and the related indicators of leveraging capacity and
indebtedness during these periods.
|
|
|
For
The Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For
The Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
on borrowings
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
2,942
|
|
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
Commitment
and other fees
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,995
|
|
|
$
|
1,965
|
|
|
$
|
3,369
|
|
|
$
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
debt outstanding
|
|
$
|
17,609
|
|
|
$
|
137,525
|
|
|
$
|
13,003
|
|
|
$
|
125,845
|
|
|
Weighted-average
interest rate on borrowings
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.94
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
|
Facility
amount at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
The
increase in our interest rate incurred is primarily due to an increase of 150
basis points in our current borrowing rate effective June 25, 2009.
As
our asset base has grown and we have added complexity to our capital raising
activities, due, in part, to our assumption of the sub-administration role from
Vastardis, we have commensurately increased the size of our administrative and
financial staff, accounting for a significant increase in the overhead
allocation from Prospect Administration. Over the last year, Prospect
Administration has added several additional staff members, including a senior
finance professional, a controller, two corporate counsels and other finance
professionals. As our portfolio continues to grow, we expect to continue to
increase the size of our administrative and financial staff on a basis that
provides increasing returns to scale. However, initial investments in
administrative and financial staff may not provide returns to scale immediately,
perhaps not until the portfolio increases to a greater size. Other allocated
expenses from Prospect Administration have, as expected, increased alongside
with the increase in staffing and asset base.
Legal
costs increased from $184 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 to $390
for the three months ended December 31, 2009 primarily due to the increased size
of our portfolio. Legal costs decreased from $483 for the six months ended
December 31, 2008 to $390 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 as there
were legal matters in the prior year that are no longer active.
Net
Investment Income, Net Realized (Loss) Gains, (Decrease) Increase in Net Assets
from Net Change in Unrealized Depreciation/Appreciation and Net (Decrease)
Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
Net
investment income was $16,925 and $11,960 for the three months ended December
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. This $4,965 increase was due
primarily to the Patriot acquisition, for we recognized a gain from the
acquisition and purchase discount accretion, partially offset by increased
advisory fees and forgone interest related to Iron Horse. Net investment income
was $29,243 and $35,462 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. This $6,219 decrease is due primarily to the settlement
of our net profit interests in IEC/ARS during the six months ended December 31,
2008, offset by the Patriot acquisition, increased advisory fees and forgone
interest related to Iron Horse for the six months ended December 31,
2009.
Net
realized (loss) gains were ($51,229) and $16 for the three months ended December
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Net realized (loss) gains were
($51,229) and $1,661 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. The net realized loss of $51,229 for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009 was due primarily to the impairment of
Yatesville. See
Investment
Valuations
for further discussion.
Net
increase (decrease) in net assets from changes in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation was $17,451 and ($5,452) for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. For the three months
ended
December
31, 2009, the $17,451 increase in net assets from the net change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation was driven primarily by our impairment of Yatesville
which resulted in $40,856 being reversed out of unrealized, partially offset by
write-downs of our investments in Ajax, H&M, NRG and R-V. For the three
months ended December 31, 2008, the $5,452 decrease in net assets from the net
change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation was driven primarily by
write-downs to our investments in Deb Shops, Iron Horse, Qualitest, RMC, Resco,
WEPI, and Yatesville which were partially offset by unrealized appreciation of
our investment in GSHI.
Net
decrease in net assets from changes in unrealized appreciation/depreciation was
$1,245 and $16,601 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. The $1,245 decrease occurring during the six months ended
December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to unrealized depreciation
recognized for our investments in Ajax, Coalbed, Deb Shops, H&M, NRG, and
R-V partially offset by the impairment of our investment in Yatesville of
$51,228. The $16,601 decrease occurring during the six months ended December 31,
2008 was attributable to unrealized depreciation recognized for our investments
in Deb Shops, Iron Horse, Qualitest, RMC, Resco, WEPI, and Yatesville partially
offset by a write-up of our investment in GSHI.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
For
the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our operating
activities provided (used) $155,128 and ($23,126) of cash, respectively.
Investing activities for the Patriot acquisition used $106,586 and zero for the
six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Financing activities provided $54,640 and $25,009 of cash during the six months
ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, which included the
payments of dividends of $36,469 and $22,221, during the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Our
primary uses of funds have been to continue to invest in our investments in
portfolio companies, to add new companies to our investment portfolio, acquire
Patriot, repay outstanding borrowings and to make cash distributions to holders
of our common stock.
We
have and may continue to fund a portion of our cash needs through borrowings
from banks, issuances of senior securities or secondary offerings. We may also
securitize a portion of our investments in mezzanine or senior secured loans or
other assets. Our objective is to put in place such borrowings in order to
enable us to expand our portfolio. At December 31, 2009, we had $10,000
outstanding borrowings on our $195,000 revolving credit facility. Subsequent to
December 31, 2009, we completed a closing for an additional $15,000 commitment
to the revolving credit facility, increasing total commitments to
$210,000.
On
September 6, 2007, our Registration Statement on Form N-2 was declared effective
by the SEC. At December 31, 2009, under the Registration Statement, we had
remaining availability to issue up to approximately $147,500 of our equity
securities over the next eight months.
We
also continue to generate liquidity through public and private stock offerings.
On July 7, 2009 we completed a public stock offering for 5,175,000 shares of our
common stock at $9.00 per share, raising $46,575 of gross proceeds. On August
20, 2009 and September 24, 2009, we issued 3,449,686 shares and 2,807,111
shares, respectively, of our common stock at $8.50 and $9.00 per share,
respectively, in private stock offerings, raising $29,322, and $25,264 of gross
proceeds, respectively. Concurrent with the sale of these shares, we entered
into a registration rights agreement in which we granted the purchasers certain
registration rights with respect to the shares. Under the terms and conditions
of the registration rights agreement, we filed with the SEC a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement on Form N-2 on November 6, 2009. Such
amendment was declared effective by the SEC on November 9, 2009.
On
December 2, 2009 we acquired the outstanding shares of Patriot common stock for
approximately $201,083. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Patriot common
shareholders received 0.363992 shares of our common
stock
for each share of Patriot common stock, resulting in 8,444,068 shares of common
stock being issued by us. In connection with the transaction, we repaid all the
outstanding borrowings of Patriot, in compliance with the merger
agreement.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
At
December 31, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet liabilities or other
contractual obligations that are reasonably likely to have a current or future
material effect on our financial condition, other than those which originate
from 1) the investment advisory and management agreement and the administration
agreement and 2) the portfolio companies.
Developments
Since the End of the Fiscal Quarter
On
January 25, 2010, we issued 236,985 shares of our common stock in connection
with the dividend reinvestment plan.
On
January 4, 2010, we completed a closing for an additional $15,000 commitment to
the Facility, increasing total commitments to $210,000.
Merger
Discussions with Allied Capital Corporation
On
January 14, 2010, Prospect Capital delivered a proposal letter to the Allied
Capital Board (the "First Prospect Capital Merger Offer Letter") containing an
offer to acquire each outstanding Allied Capital Corporation ("Allied Capital")
Share in exchange for 0.385 of a share of Prospect Capital Common Stock (the
"First Prospect Capital Merger Offer").
On
January 19, 2010, Allied Capital filed a Form 8-K stating that the Allied
Capital Board determined that the First Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not
constitute a "Superior Proposal" as such term is defined in the Ares Capital
Merger Agreement.
On
January 20, 2010, Prospect Capital issued a press release containing a copy of a
letter it subsequently sent to the Allied Capital Board in connection with the
First Prospect Capital Merger Offer.
On
January 26, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it delivered another letter to
the Allied Capital Board, raising its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the
"Second Prospect Capital Merger Offer Letter").
On
February 3, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed a Form 8-K stating that
the Allied Capital Board determined that the Second Prospect Capital Merger
Offer did not constitute a "Superior Proposal" as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement.
On
February 9, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it delivered another letter to
the Allied Capital Board, raising its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the
"Third Prospect Capital Merger Offer Letter")
.
On
February 11, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed a Form 8-K stating
that the Allied Capital Board determined that the Third Prospect Capital Merger
Offer did not constitute a "Superior Proposal" as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement. Prospect Capital has filed proxy materials
to solicit Allied Shareholders to vote against Allied's proposed merger with
Ares Capital Corporation. A merger with Allied would be material to
Prospect Capital and its shareholders. If Prospect Capital were to
negotiate a merger agreement with Allied, Prospect Capital would provide
extensive disclosure to its shareholders regarding the terms and conditions of
and risks regarding such transaction.
REPORT
OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. Internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Company's internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to assets of the
Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition
of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Management
performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009 based upon criteria in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Based on our assessment,
management determined that the Company's internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of June 30, 2009 based on the criteria on Internal
Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO. There were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2009
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Our
management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2009 has been audited by BDO Seidman LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which
appears in the 10-K.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
Unless
otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend to use the net
proceeds from selling Securities pursuant to this prospectus initially to
maintain balance sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under our credit
facility, investments in high quality short-term debt instruments or a
combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term investments in accordance
with our investment objective. A supplement to this prospectus relating to each
offering will provide additional detail, to the extent known at the time,
regarding the use of the proceeds from such offering including any intention to
utilize proceeds to pay expenses in order to avoid sales of long-term
assets.
We
anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds of an offering of
Securities pursuant to this prospectus will be used for the above purposes
within six months, depending on the availability of appropriate investment
opportunities consistent with our investment objective and market conditions. In
addition, we expect that there will be several offerings pursuant to this
prospectus; we expect that substantially all of the proceeds from all offerings
will be used within three years. Pending our new investments, we plan to invest
a portion of net proceeds in cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and
other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less from the
date of investment and other general corporate purposes. The management fee
payable by us will not be reduced while our assets are invested in such
securities. See "Regulation — Temporary Investments" for additional information
about temporary investments we may make while waiting to make longer-term
investments in pursuit of our investment objective.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Our
annual report on Form l0-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, any of our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K, or any other oral
or written statements made in press releases or otherwise by or on behalf of
Prospect Capital Corporation including this prospectus may contain forward
looking statements within the meaning of the Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. Forward looking statements predict or describe our future
operations, business plans, business and investment strategies and portfolio
management and the performance of our investments and our investment management
business. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather
are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry,
our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as "intends," "intend," "intended,"
"goal," "estimate," "estimates," "expects," "expect," "expected," "project,"
"projected," "projections," "plans," "seeks," "anticipates," "anticipated,"
"should," "could," "may," "will," "designed to," "foreseeable future,"
"believe," "believes" and "scheduled" and variations of these words and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual
results or outcomes may differ materially from those anticipated. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which
speak only as of the date the statement was made. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise. These forward-looking statements do
not meet the safe harbor for forward-looking statements pursuant to Section 27A
of the Securities Act. These statements are not guarantees of future performance
and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are
beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking
statements, including without limitation:
|
|
·
|
our
future operating results,
|
|
|
·
|
our
business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio
companies,
|
|
|
·
|
the
impact of investments that we expect to make,
|
|
|
·
|
the
dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on
the industries in which we invest,
|
|
|
·
|
the
ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their
objectives,
|
|
|
·
|
difficulty
in obtaining financing or raising capital, especially in the current
credit and equity environment,
|
|
|
·
|
the
level and volatility of prevailing interest rates and credit spreads,
magnified by the current turmoil in the credit markets,
|
|
|
·
|
adverse
developments in the availability of desirable loan and investment
opportunities whether they are due to competition, regulation or
otherwise,
|
|
|
·
|
a
compression of the yield on our investments and the cost of our
liabilities, as well as the level of leverage available to
us,
|
|
|
·
|
our
regulatory structure and tax treatment, including our ability to operate
as a business development company and a regulated investment
company;
|
|
|
·
|
the
adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;
|
|
|
·
|
the
timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio
companies;
|
|
|
·
|
the
ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable investments for us
and to monitor and administer our
investments,
|
|
|
·
|
authoritative
generally accepted accounting principles or policy changes from such
standard-setting bodies as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Internal Revenue Service, the New York
Stock Exchange, and other authorities that we are subject to, as well as
their counterparts in any foreign jurisdictions where we might do
business; and
|
|
|
·
|
the
risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in "Risk Factors" and
elsewhere in this prospectus and in our filings with the
SEC.
|
Although
we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are
based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and
as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also
could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new
loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the
availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties,
the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this prospectus
should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives
will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or
identified in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should not
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of
the date of this prospectus.
DISTRIBUTIONS
We
have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly distributions to our
stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. Our
distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors. Certain
amounts of the quarterly distributions may from time to time be paid out of our
capital rather than from earnings for the quarter as a result of our deliberate
planning or by accounting reclassifications.
In
order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at least 90% of our
ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized
net long-term capital losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on RICs, we are
required to distribute with respect to each calendar year by January 31 of the
following year an amount at least equal to the sum of
|
|
·
|
98%
of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
·
|
98%
of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period
ending on October 31 of the calendar year, and
|
|
|
·
|
any
ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not
distributed during such years.
|
In
December 2008, our Board of Directors elected to retain excess profits generated
in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and pay a 4% excise tax on such retained
earnings. This tax of $533,000 was paid in the quarter ending March 31,
2009.
In
addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized net capital gains
(which we define as net long-term capital gains in excess of short-term capital
losses), if any, at least annually, out of the assets legally available for such
distributions, we may decide in the future to retain such capital gains for
investment. In such event, the consequences of our retention of net capital
gains are as described under "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations."
We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the
payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we may be
prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain
the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are
limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.
We
maintain an "opt out" dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As
a result, if we declare a dividend, then stockholders' cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they
specifically "opt out" of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash
dividends. See "Dividend Reinvestment Plan." To the extent prudent and
practicable, we intend to declare and pay dividends on a quarterly
basis.
With
respect to the dividends paid to stockholders, income from origination,
structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront fees associated with
investments in portfolio companies were treated as taxable income and
accordingly, distributed to stockholders. For the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, we declared total dividends of approximately $56.1 million. For the first
and second quarters of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, we paid total
distributions of approximately $22.3 million and $25.9 million,
respectively.
Tax
characteristics of all distributions will be reported to stockholders, as
appropriate, on Form 1099-DIV after the end of the year. Our ability to pay
distributions could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
The
following table lists the quarterly distributions per share since shares of our
common stock began being regularly quoted on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2004
|
|
12/10/2004
|
|
12/30/2004
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
$
|
705,510
|
|
|
2/9/2005
|
|
3/11/2005
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
$
|
0.125
|
|
|
$
|
881,888
|
|
|
4/21/2005
|
|
6/10/2005
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
$
|
0.150
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,265
|
|
|
9/15/2005
|
|
9/22/2005
|
|
9/29/2005
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
$
|
1,411,020
|
|
|
12/12/2005
|
|
12/22/2005
|
|
12/29/2005
|
|
$
|
0.280
|
|
|
$
|
1,975,428
|
|
|
3/15/2006
|
|
3/24/2006
|
|
3/31/2006
|
|
$
|
0.300
|
|
|
$
|
2,116,530
|
|
|
6/14/2006
|
|
6/23/2006
|
|
6/30/2006
|
|
$
|
0.340
|
|
|
$
|
2,401,060
|
|
|
7/31/2006
|
|
9/22/2006
|
|
9/29/2006
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
|
$
|
4,858,879
|
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
12/29/2006
|
|
1/5/2007
|
|
$
|
0.385
|
|
|
$
|
7,263,926
|
|
|
3/14/2007
|
|
3/23/2007
|
|
3/30/2007
|
|
$
|
0.3875
|
|
|
$
|
7,666,837
|
|
|
6/14/2007
|
|
6/22/2007
|
|
6/29/2007
|
|
$
|
0.390
|
|
|
$
|
7,752,900
|
|
|
9/6/2007
|
|
9/19/2007
|
|
9/28/2007
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
|
|
$
|
7,830,008
|
|
|
12/18/2007
|
|
12/28/2007
|
|
1/7/2008
|
|
$
|
0.395
|
|
|
$
|
9,369,850
|
|
|
3/6/2008
|
|
3/31/2008
|
|
4/16/2008
|
|
$
|
0.400
|
|
|
$
|
10,468,455
|
|
|
6/19/2008
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
7/16/2008
|
|
$
|
0.40125
|
|
|
$
|
11,845,052
|
|
|
9/16/2008
|
|
9/30/2008
|
|
10/16/2008
|
|
$
|
0.4025
|
|
|
$
|
11,881,953
|
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
1/19/2009
|
|
$
|
0.40375
|
|
|
$
|
11,966,313
|
|
|
3/24/2009
|
|
3/31/2009
|
|
4/20/2009
|
|
$
|
0.405
|
|
|
$
|
12,670,882
|
|
|
6/23/2009
|
|
7/8/2009
|
|
7/20/2009
|
|
$
|
0.40625
|
|
|
$
|
19,547,972
|
|
|
9/28/2009
|
|
10/8/2009
|
|
10/19/2009
|
|
$
|
0.4075
|
|
|
$
|
22,278,903
|
|
|
12/17/2009
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
1/25/2010
|
|
$
|
0.40875
|
|
|
$
|
25,894,209
|
|
|
Total
Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
181,845,840
|
|
SENIOR
SECURITIES
Information
about our senior securities is shown in the following table as of each fiscal
year ended June 30 since the Company commenced operations and as of December 31,
2009
, unless
otherwise noted.
The report of our independent registered public
accounting firm on the senior securities table as of June 30, 2009 is attached
as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part
.
|
|
|
Total
Amount Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
Asset
Coverage per Unit(2)
|
|
|
Involuntary
Liquidating
Preference
Per
Unit(3)
|
|
|
Average
Market
Value
Per
Unit(4)
|
|
|
Credit
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 (as of December 31, 2009, unaudited)
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
64,748
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Fiscal
2009 (as of June 30, 2009)
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Fiscal
2008 (as of June 30, 2008)
|
|
|
91,167
|
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007 (as of June 30, 2007)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Fiscal
2006 (as of June 30, 2006)
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
4,799
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Fiscal
2005 (as of June 30, 2005)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Fiscal
2004 (as of June 30, 2004)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Total
amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at the end of the
period presented (in 000’s).
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
The
asset coverage ratio for a class of senior securities representing
indebtedness is calculated as our consolidated total assets, less all
liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, divided
by senior securities representing indebtedness. This asset coverage ratio
is multiplied by $1,000 to determine the Asset Coverage Per
Unit.
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
This
column is inapplicable because we have had only bank debt outstanding
during the time periods.
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
This
column is inapplicable because we have not had any preferred stock
outstanding during any of the time
periods.
|
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our
common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
"PSEC." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our net asset
value per share of common stock and the high and low sales prices per share of
our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our common
stock historically trades at prices both above and below its NAV. There can be
no assurance, however, that such premium or discount, as applicable, to NAV will
be maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
(Discount)
of
High to
|
|
|
Premium
(Discount)
of
Low to
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
15.15
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.280
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.300
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.340
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
14.86
|
|
|
$
|
16.77
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
|
|
18.79
|
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.385
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
15.18
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3875
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.390
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
15.08
|
|
|
$
|
18.68
|
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
14.58
|
|
|
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
11.22
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.395
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
14.15
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
13.55
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.400
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
16.12
|
|
|
|
13.18
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40125
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
$
|
11.12
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4025
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(56.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40375
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
14.19
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40625
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.82
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4075
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
12.31
|
|
|
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40875
|
|
|
Third
quarter (to 2/25/10)
|
|
|
(3
|
)(4)
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net
asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant
quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the
date of the high or low sales price. The NAVs shown are based on
outstanding shares at the end of each period.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
The
High/Low Stock Price is calculated as of the closing price on a given day
in the applicable quarter.
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Our
most recently determined NAV per share was $10.06 as of December 31, 2009
($10.07 on an as adjusted basis solely to give effect to our issuance of
common stock on January 25, 2010 in connection with our dividend
reinvestment plan). NAV as of March 31, 2010 may be higher or lower than
$10.07 based on potential changes in valuations as of March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
NAV
has not yet been finally determined for any day after December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
The
dividend for the third quarter of 2010 will be declared in March
2010.
|
On
February 25, 2010, the last reported sales price of our common stock was $11.66
per share. As of February 25, 2010, we had approximately 69 stockholders of
record.
BUSINESS
General
We
are a financial services company that primarily lends to and invests in middle
market privately-held companies. We are a closed-end investment company that has
filed an election to be treated as a business development company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. We invest primarily in senior
and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project financing and
recapitalization. We work with the management teams or financial sponsors to
seek investments with historical cash flows, asset collateral or contracted
pro-forma cash flows.
On
July 27, 2004, we completed our initial public offering, or IPO, and sold 7
million shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per share, less underwriting
discounts and commissions totaling $1.05 per share. An additional 55,000 shares
were issued through the exercise of an over-allotment option with respect to the
IPO on August 27, 2004. Since the IPO and the exercise of the related
over-allotment option, we have made eleven other share offerings and six related
over-allotment options resulting in the issuance of 43,493,836 shares at prices
ranging from $7.75 to $17.70. The most recent offering was completed on
September 24, 2009 pursuant to which the Company sold 2,807,111 at an
unregistered direct price of $9.00 per share.
On
December 2, 2009, we completed our previously announced acquisition of Patriot
under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2009, by and
among, us and Patriot. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we
acquired Patriot for approximately $200 million comprised of our common stock
and cash to repay all of Patriot’s outstanding debt, which amounted to $107.3
million. In the merger, each outstanding share of Patriot common
stock was converted into the right to receive 0.363992 shares of common stock of
Prospect, representing 8,444,068 shares of the Company’s common stock, and the
payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares of Prospect common stock of less
than $200 resulting from the application of the foregoing exchange
ratio.
Our
headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016,
and our telephone number is (212) 448-0702. Our investment adviser is Prospect
Capital Management LLC.
Our
Investment Objective and Policies
Our
investment objective is to generate both current income and long-term capital
appreciation through debt and equity investments. We focus on making investments
in private companies, and many of our investments are in energy companies. We
are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
Typically,
we concentrate on making investments in companies with annual revenues of less
than $500 million and enterprise values of less than $250 million. Our typical
investment involves a secured loan of less than $50 million with some form of
equity participation. From time to time, we acquire controlling interests in
companies in conjunction with making secured debt investments in such companies.
In most cases, companies in which we invest are privately held at the time we
invest in them. We refer to these companies as "target" or "middle market"
companies and these investments as "middle market investments."
We
seek to maximize returns and protect risk for our investors by applying rigorous
analysis to make and monitor our investments. While the structure of our
investments varies, we can invest in senior secured debt, senior unsecured debt,
subordinated secured debt, subordinated unsecured debt, mezzanine debt,
convertible debt, convertible preferred equity, preferred equity, common equity,
warrants and other instruments, many of which generate current yield. Our
investments primarily range between approximately $5 million and $50 million
each, although this investment size may vary as the size of our capital base
changes.
While
our primary focus is to seek current income through investment in the debt
and/or dividend-paying equity securities of eligible privately-held,
thinly-traded or distressed companies and long-term capital appreciation by
acquiring accompanying warrants, options or other equity securities of such
companies, we may invest up to 30% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments
in order to seek enhanced returns for stockholders. Such investments may include
investments in the debt and equity instruments of broadly-traded public
companies. We expect that these public companies generally will have debt
securities that are non-investment grade. Within this 30% basket, we may also
invest in debt and equity securities of companies located outside of the United
States.
Our
investments may include other equity investments, such as warrants, options to
buy a minority interest in a portfolio company, or contractual payment rights or
rights to receive a proportional interest in the operating cash flow or net
income of such company. When determined by our Investment Adviser to be in our
best interest, we may acquire a controlling interest in a portfolio company. Any
warrants we receive with our debt securities may require only a nominal cost to
exercise, and thus, as a portfolio company appreciates in value, we may achieve
additional investment return from this equity interest. We have structured, and
will continue to structure, some warrants to include provisions protecting our
rights as a minority-interest or, if applicable, controlling-interest holder, as
well as puts, or rights to sell such securities back to the company, upon the
occurrence of specified events. In many cases, we obtain registration rights in
connection with these equity interests, which may include demand and "piggyback"
registration rights.
We
plan to hold many of our investments to maturity or repayment, but will sell our
investments earlier if a liquidity event takes place, such as the sale or
recapitalization of a portfolio company, or if we determine a sale of one or
more of our investments to be in our best interest.
We
have qualified and elected to be treated for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as
a Registered Investment Company ("RIC") under Subchapter M of the Code. As a
RIC, we generally do not have to pay corporate-level U.S. Federal income taxes
on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders
as dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet
certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described
below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our
stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our "investment company
taxable income," which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our
realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital
losses.
For
a discussion of the risks inherent in our portfolio investments, see "Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to our Investments."
Industry
Sectors
We
have invested significantly in industrial and energy related companies. However,
we continue to widen our focus in other sectors of the economy to diversify our
portfolio holdings. The energy industry consists of companies in the direct
energy value chain as well as companies that sell products and services to, or
acquire products and services from, the direct energy value chain. In this
prospectus, we refer to all of these companies as "energy companies" and assets
in these companies as "energy assets." The categories of energy companies in
this chain are described below. The direct energy value chain broadly includes
upstream businesses, midstream businesses and downstream
businesses:
|
|
·
|
Upstream
businesses find, develop and extract energy resources, including natural
gas, crude oil and coal, which are typically from geological reservoirs
found underground or offshore, and agricultural
products.
|
|
|
·
|
Midstream
businesses gather, process, refine, store and transmit energy resources
and their by products in a form that is usable by wholesale power
generation, utility, petrochemical, industrial and gasoline
customers.
|
|
|
·
|
Downstream
businesses include the power and electricity segment as well as businesses
that process, refine, market or distribute hydrocarbons or other energy
resources, such as customer-ready natural gas, propane and gasoline, to
end-user customers.
|
Ongoing
Relationships with Portfolio Companies
Monitoring
Prospect
Capital Management monitors our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis.
Prospect Capital Management will continue to monitor the financial trends of
each portfolio company to determine if it is meeting its business plan and to
assess the appropriate course of action for each company.
Prospect
Capital Management employs several methods of evaluating and monitoring the
performance and value of our investments, which may include, but are not limited
to, the following:
|
|
·
|
Assessment
of success in adhering to the portfolio company's business plan and
compliance with covenants;
|
|
|
·
|
Regular
contact with portfolio company management and, if appropriate, the
financial or strategic sponsor, to discuss financial position,
requirements and accomplishments;
|
|
|
·
|
Attendance
at and participation in board meetings of the portfolio company;
and
|
|
|
·
|
Review
of monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections
for the portfolio company.
|
Investment
Valuation
Our
Board of Directors has established procedures for the valuation of our
investment portfolio. These procedures are detailed below.
Investments
for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market
quotations.
For
most of our investments, market quotations are not available. With respect to
investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such
market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of Directors
has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described
below:
1)
each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our investment professionals
with the independent valuation firm engaged by our Board of
Directors;
2)
the independent valuation firm conducts independent appraisals and makes their
own independent assessment;
3)
the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews and discusses the
preliminary valuation of our Investment Adviser and that of the independent
valuation firm; and
4)
the Board of Directors discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of
each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of our
Investment Adviser, the independent valuation firm and the audit
committee.
Investments
are valued utilizing a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches,
as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation
techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a
single present value amount (discounted) calculated based on an appropriate
discount rate. The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these
approaches, the types of factors that we may take into account in fair value
pricing our investments include, as relevant: available current market data,
including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables,
applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection
provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments, its earnings and
discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business,
comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A
comparables, the principal market and enterprise values, among other
factors.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC" or "Codification") 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures
("ASC 820"). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. We adopted ASC 820 on a prospective basis beginning in the
quarter ended September 30, 2008.
ASC
820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following
hierarchy:
Level 1
: Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by the
Company at the measurement date.
Level 2
: Quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level
3
: Unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability.
In
all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to each
investment.
The
changes to generally accepted accounting principles from the application of ASC
820 relate to the definition of fair value, framework for measuring fair value,
and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to
fair value measurements already required or permitted by other
standards.
In
accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of our investments is defined as the
price that we would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction
to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market in which
that investment is transacted.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820-10-65,
Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly"
("ASC
820-10-65"). This update provides further clarification for ASC 820 in markets
that are not active and provides additional guidance for determining when the
volume of trading level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. ASC 820-10-65 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10-65 for
the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009, did not have any effect on our net
asset value, financial position or results of operations as there was no change
to the fair value measurement principles set forth in ASC 820.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements
("ASC 2010-06"). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820-10 and clarifies
and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and
non-recurring fair value measurements and employers' disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Our management does
not believe that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC 820-10 will have a
significant effect on our financial statements.
For
a discussion of the risks inherent in determining the value of securities for
which readily available market values do not exist, see "Risk Factors — Risks
relating to our business — Most of our portfolio investments are recorded at
fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a
result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments."
Valuation
of Other Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In
February 2007, FASB issued ASC Subtopic 820-10-05-1,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities
("ASC 820-10-05-1"). ASC 820-10-05-1 permits an
entity to elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute
for many of assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has been
elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using another measurement
attribute. We have adopted this statement on July 1, 2008 and have elected not
to value some assets and liabilities at fair value as would be permitted by ASC
820-10-05-1.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect
Capital Management manages our investments as our investment adviser. Prospect
Capital Management is a Delaware limited liability corporation that has been
registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act since March 31, 2004.
Prospect Capital Management is led by John F. Barry III and M. Grier Eliasek,
two senior executives with significant investment advisory and business
experience. Both Messrs. Barry and Eliasek spend a significant amount of their
time in their roles at Prospect Capital Management working on the Company's
behalf. The principal executive offices of Prospect Capital Management are 10
East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016. We depend on the diligence,
skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of our
Investment Adviser. We also depend, to a significant extent, on our Investment
Adviser's investment professionals and the information and deal flow generated
by those investment professionals in the course of their investment and
portfolio management activities. The Investment Adviser's senior management team
evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes, monitors and services our
investments. Our future success depends to a significant extent on the continued
service of the senior management team, particularly John F. Barry III and M.
Grier Eliasek. The departure of any of the senior managers of our Investment
Adviser could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to achieve our
investment objective. In addition, we can offer no assurance that Prospect
Capital Management will remain our Investment Adviser or that we will continue
to have access to its investment professionals or its information and deal flow.
Under our Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay Prospect Capital Management
investment advisory fees, which consist of an annual base management fee based
on our gross assets as well as a two-part incentive fee based on our
performance. Mr. Barry currently controls Prospect Capital Management. See
"Management — Management Services — Board of Directors approval of the
Investment Advisory Agreement."
As
a business development company, we offer, and must provide upon request,
managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. This assistance
could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our portfolio
companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and
advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and
financial guidance. We may receive fees for these
services.
Such fees would not qualify as "good income" for purposes of the 90% income test
that we must meet each year to qualify as a RIC. Prospect Administration
provides such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio companies when we
are required to provide this assistance.
Staffing
Mr.
John F. Barry III, our chairman and chief executive officer, Mr. Grier Eliasek,
our chief operating officer and president, and Mr. Brian H. Oswald, our chief
financial officer, chief compliance officer, treasurer and secretary, comprise
our senior management. Over time, we expect to add additional officers and
employees. Messrs. Barry and Eliasek each also serves as an officer of Prospect
Administration and performs his respective functions under the terms of the
Administration Agreement. Our day-to-day investment operations are managed by
Prospect Capital Management. In addition, we reimburse Prospect Administration
for our allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in performing its
obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary and their respective staffs. See "Management — Management Services —
Administration Agreement."
Properties
We
do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to
our operation. Our corporate headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, where we occupy an office space pursuant to the
Administration Agreement.
Legal
Proceedings
On
December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, L.P. ("DGP") served us with a complaint
filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division. DGP alleges that DGP was defrauded and that we breached our
fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with DGP's contract to purchase
Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection
with our alleged agreement in September 2004 to loan DGP funds with which DGP
intended to buy Gas Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The complaint
sought relief not limited to $100 million. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate
Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Texas, Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant our
Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006,
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Galveston Division issued an order granting our Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP, against us. On May 16, 2007, the
Court also granted us summary judgment on DGP's liability to us on our
counterclaim for DGP's breach of a release and covenant not to sue. On January
4, 2008, the Court, Judge Melinda Harmon presiding, granted our motion to
dismiss all DGP's claims asserted against certain of our officers and
affiliates. On August 20, 2008, Judge Harmon entered a Final Judgment dismissing
all of DGP's claims. DGP appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, which affirmed the Final Judgment on June 24, 2009. DGP has moved for
rehearing. Our damage claims against DGP remain pending.
In
May 2006, based in part on unfavorable due diligence and the absence of
investment committee approval, we declined to extend a loan for $10 million to a
potential borrower ("plaintiff"). Plaintiff was subsequently sued by its own
attorney in a local Texas court for plaintiff's failure to pay fees owed to its
attorney. In December 2006, plaintiff filed a cross-action against us and
certain of our affiliates (the "defendants") in the same local Texas court,
alleging, among other things, tortious interference with contract and fraud. We
petitioned the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (the "District Court") to compel arbitration and to enjoin the Texas
action. In February 2007, our motions were granted. Plaintiff appealed that
decision. On July 24, 2008, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the
judgment of the District Court. The arbitration commenced in July 2007 and
concluded in late November 2007. Post-hearing briefings were completed in
February 2008. On April 14, 2008, the arbitrator rendered an award in our favor,
rejecting all of plaintiff's claims. On April 18, 2008, we filed a petition
before the District Court to confirm the award. On October 8, 2008, the District
Court granted the Company's
petition
to confirm the award, confirmed the awards and subsequently entered judgment
thereon in favor of the Company in the amount of $2.3 million. After filing a
defective notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit on November 5, 2008, plaintiff's counsel resubmitted a new notice of
appeal on January 9, 2009. The plaintiff subsequently requested that the Company
agree to stipulate to the withdrawal of plaintiff's appeal to the Second
Circuit. Such a stipulation was filed with the Second Circuit on or about April
14, 2009. Based on this stipulation, the Second Circuit issued a mandate
terminating the appeal, which was transmitted to the District Court on April 23,
2009. Post-judgment discovery against plaintiff is continuing and we have filed
a motion for sanctions against plaintiff's counsel. Argument for the motion for
sanctions was held on November 19, 2009 and a decision from the court is
pending.
We
are involved in various investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise
in the ordinary course of our business. These matters may relate to intellectual
property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or other matters. The resolution
of such matters that may arise out of these investigations, claims and
proceedings will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such matters
are without merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources.
We
are not aware of any other material pending legal proceeding, and no such
material proceedings are contemplated to which we are a party or of which any of
our property is subject.
Management
Our
business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors.
Our Board of Directors currently consists of five directors, three of whom are
not "interested persons" of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the
1940 Act. We refer to these individuals as our independent directors. Our Board
of Directors elects our officers to serve for a one-year term and until their
successors are duly elected and qualify, or until their earlier removal or
resignation.
Board
Of Directors And Executive Officers
Under
our charter, our directors are divided into three classes. Directors are elected
for a staggered term of three years each, with a term of office of one of the
three classes of directors expiring each year. At each annual meeting of our
stockholders, the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at
such meeting are elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual
meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their
election. Each director holds office for the term to which he or she is elected
and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies.
Directors
and Executive Officers
Our
directors and executive officers and their positions are set forth below. The
address for each director and executive officer is c/o Prospect Capital
Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
Independent
Directors
|
|
Position(s)
Held with the Company
|
Term
of Office(1) and Length of Time Served
|
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
Number
of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director
|
Other
Directorships Held by Director(2)
|
|
Graham
D.S. Anderson, 45
|
Director
|
Class
I Director since September 2008; Term expires 2011
|
General
Partner of Euclid SR Partners from 2000 to present. From 1996 to 2000, Mr.
Anderson was a General Partner of Euclid Partners, the predecessor to
Euclid SR Partners.
|
One
|
None
|
|
Eugene
S. Stark, 52
|
Director
|
Class III
Director
since September 2008; Term expires 2010
|
Principal
Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President —
Administration of General American Investors Company, Inc. from May 2005
to present. Prior to his role with General American Investors Company,
Inc., Mr. Stark served as the Chief Financial Officer of Prospect Capital
Corporation from January 2005 to April 2005. From May 1987 to December
2004 Mr. Stark served as Senior Vice President and Vice President with
Prudential Financial, Inc.
|
One
|
None
|
|
Andrew
C. Cooper, 48
|
Director
|
Class II
Director
since February 2009; Term expires 2012
|
Mr.
Cooper is an entrepreneur, who over the last 11 years has founded,
built, run and sold three companies. He is Co-Chief Executive Officer of
Unison Site Management, Inc., a specialty finance company focusing on cell
site easements, and Executive Director of Brand Asset Digital, a digital
media marketing and distribution company. Prior to that, Mr. Cooper
focused on venture capital and investment banking for Morgan Stanley for
14 years.
|
One
|
Unison
Site Management, LLC, Brand Asset
Digital,
LLC and Aquatic Energy, LLC
|
|
(1)
|
Our
Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors serving
staggered three-year terms. Mr. Anderson is a Class I director with a term
that will expire in 2011, Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Cooper are Class II
directors with terms that will expire in 2012 and Mr. Barry and Mr. Stark
are Class III directors with terms that will expire in
2010.
|
|
(2)
|
No
director otherwise serves as a director of an investment company subject
to the 1940 Act.
|
Interested
Directors
|
|
Position(s)
Held
with
the
Company
|
Term
of
Office(1)
and
Length
of
Time
Served
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5 Years
|
Number
of
Portfolios
in
Fund
Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
Other
Directorships
Held
by
Director(2)
|
|
John
F. Barry III,(3) 57
|
Director,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Class III
Director since June 2004; Term expires 2010
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; Managing Director and Chairman
of the Investment Committee of Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration since June 2004; Managing Director of Prospect Capital
Management.
|
One
|
None
|
|
M.
Grier Eliasek,(3) 36
|
Director,
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Class II
Director since June 2004; Term expires 2012
|
President
and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Managing Director of Prospect
Capital Management and Prospect Administration
|
One
|
None
|
|
(1)
|
Our
Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors serving
staggered three-year terms. Mr. Anderson is a Class I director with a term
that will expire in 2011, Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Cooper are Class II
directors with terms that will expire in 2012 and Mr. Barry and Mr. Stark
are Class III directors with terms that will expire in
2010.
|
|
(2)
|
No
director otherwise serves as a director of an investment company subject
to the 1940 Act.
|
|
(3)
|
Messrs.
Barry and Eliasek are each considered an "interested person" under the
1940 Act by virtue of serving as one of our officers and having a
relationship with Prospect Capital
Management.
|
Information
about Executive Officers who are not Directors
|
|
Position(s)
Held with
the
Company
|
Term
of Office and
Length
of Time Served
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past Five Years
|
|
Brian
H. Oswald, 49
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
|
November
2008 to present as Chief Financial Officer and October 2008 to present as
Chief Compliance Officer
|
Joined
Prospect Administration as Managing Director in June 2008. Previously
Managing Director in Structured Finance Group at GSC Group (2006 to 2008)
and Chief Financial Officer at Capital Trust, Inc. (2003 to
2005)
|
Independent
Directors
Graham D.S.
Anderson
. Mr. Anderson has served as General Partner of Euclid
SR Partners from 1996 to present. Mr. Anderson currently serves as a member of
the Board of Directors of Acurian, Inc. (a clinical trial recruitment company),
FatWire Software Corp. (a web content management company), iJet Risk Management
(an
operational
risk management information company), Plateau Systems Limited (a human capital
management software company) and SkinMedica Inc. (a dermatology and
cosmeceuticals company).
Andrew C.
Cooper
. Mr. Cooper has 24 years of experience in growth
company management, venture investing and investment banking. He has a wide
range of operational, marketing, technology, and debt and equity capital raising
expertise. Mr. Cooper is an entrepreneur, who over the last 11 years has
founded, built, run and sold three companies. Prior to that, Mr. Cooper focused
on venture capital and investment banking for Morgan Stanley for 14 years. He is
Co-Chief Executive Officer of Unison Site Management, Inc., a specialty finance
company focusing on cell site easements, and Executive Director of Brand Asset
Digital, a digital media marketing and distribution company. His current Board
appointments include Unison Site Management, LLC, Brand Asset Digital, LLC and
Aquatic Energy, LLC.
Eugene S.
Stark
. Mr. Stark has served as Principal Financial Officer,
Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President — Administration of General American
Investors Company, Inc. from May 2005 to present. Prior to his role with General
American Investors Company, Inc., Mr. Stark served as the Chief Financial
Officer of Prospect Capital Corporation from January 2005 to April 2005. From
May 1987 to December 2004 Mr. Stark served as Senior Vice President (division
level) and Vice President (corporate level) with Prudential Financial, Inc. in
various financial management positions. Mr. Stark serves as a member of the
Board of Directors of Prospect Capital Funding LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company, and sits on the Board of Trustees and is a Member of the Finance
Committee of Mount Saint Mary Academy.
Interested
Directors
John F. Barry
III
. Mr. Barry is chairman and chief executive officer of the
Company and is a control person of Prospect Capital Management and a managing
director of Prospect Administration. Mr. Barry is chairman of Prospect's
investment committee and has been an officer of Prospect since 1990. In addition
to overseeing Prospect, Mr. Barry has served on the boards of directors of
twelve private and public Prospect portfolio companies. Mr. Barry has served on
the board of advisors of USEC Inc., a publicly-traded energy company. Mr. Barry
has served as chairman and chief executive officer of Bondnet Trading Systems.
From 1988 to 1989, Mr. Barry managed the investment bank of L.F. Rothschild
& Company, focusing on private equity and debt financings for energy and
other companies. From 1983 to 1988, Mr. Barry was a senior investment and
merchant banker at Merrill Lynch & Co., where he was a founding member of
the project finance group, executing more than $4 billion in energy and other
financings. From 1979 to 1983, Mr. Barry was a corporate securities attorney at
Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he advised energy companies and their
commercial and investment bankers. From 1978 to 1979, Mr. Barry served as law
clerk to Circuit Judge, formerly Chief Judge, J. Edward Lumbard of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City. Mr. Barry is chairman
of the board of directors of the Mathematics Foundation of America, a non-profit
foundation which enhances opportunities in mathematics education for students
from diverse backgrounds. Mr. Barry received his JD cum laude from Harvard Law
School, where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review, and his Bachelor of
Arts magna cum laude from Princeton University, where he was a University
Scholar.
M. Grier
Eliasek
. Mr. Eliasek is president and chief operating officer
of the Company and a managing director of Prospect Capital Management and
Prospect Administration. At the Company, Mr. Eliasek is responsible for various
administrative and investment management functions and leads and supervises
other Prospect professionals in origination and assessment of investments. Mr.
Eliasek has served as a senior investment professional at Prospect since 1999.
Prior to joining Prospect, Mr. Eliasek assisted the chief financial officer of
Amazon.com in 1999 in corporate strategy, customer acquisition, and new product
launches. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Eliasek served as a consultant with Bain &
Company, a global strategy consulting firm, where he managed engagements for
companies in several different industries. At Bain, Mr. Eliasek analyzed new
lines of businesses, developed market strategies, revamped sales organizations
and improved operational performance. Mr. Eliasek received his MBA from Harvard
Business School. Mr. Eliasek received his Bachelor of Science in Chemical
Engineering with Highest Distinction from the University of Virginia, where he
was a Jefferson Scholar and a Rodman Scholar.
Executive
Officer
Brian H.
Oswald
. Mr. Oswald is chief financial officer, chief
compliance officer, secretary and treasurer of the Company. He began his career
at KPMG Peat Marwick, where he held various positions over his ten-year tenure,
finishing as a Senior Manager in the financial institutions group. During his
time at KPMG, he served as the reviewing senior manager for several initial
public offerings of financial institutions. After KPMG, Mr. Oswald served as the
Executive Vice President and President of Gloversville Federal Savings and Loan
Association, served as the Director of Financial Reporting and Subsidiary
Accounting for River Bank America and served as the Corporate Controller for
Magic Solutions, Inc. In each of these positions, Mr. Oswald instituted
significant operational changes and was instrumental in raising additional
equity for River Bank America. From 2003 to 2005, Mr. Oswald led Capital Trust,
Inc., a self-managed finance and investment management REIT which specializes in
credit-sensitive structured financial products, as Chief Financial Officer. From
1997 to 2003, he served as Chief Accounting Officer for Capital Trust. Prior to
joining the Company, Mr. Oswald spent two years with the Structured Finance
Division of GSC Group, serving as Managing Director of Finance for this asset
management company. At GSC, Mr. Oswald managed the finances for a REIT, two
hedge funds and thirteen CDOs. Mr. Oswald joined the Administrator on June 16,
2008. Mr. Oswald holds a B.A. degree in Accounting from Moravian College. He is
a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the States of New York and
Pennsylvania, and is a Certified Management Accountant. Mr. Oswald also serves
as a board member of RMJ Laboratories, Inc.
For
information on the investment professionals of Prospect Capital Management, see
"Business — The Investment Adviser — Staffing."
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our
Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee and a Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, our
Board of Directors held twenty-two Board of Director meetings, eleven Audit
Committee meetings, and five Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
meeting. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings
of the Board of Directors and of the respective committees on which they served.
We require each director to make a diligent effort to attend all board and
committee meetings, as well as each annual meeting of stockholders.
The Audit
Committee
. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter
approved by the Board of Directors. The charter sets forth the responsibilities
of the Audit Committee, which include selecting or retaining each year an
independent registered public accounting firm, or the independent accountants,
to audit the accounts and records of the Company; reviewing and discussing with
management and the independent accountants the annual audited financial
statements of the Company, including disclosures made in management's discussion
and analysis, and recommending to the Board of Directors whether the audited
financial statements should be included in the Company's annual report on Form
10-K; reviewing and discussing with management and the independent accountants
the Company's quarterly financial statements prior to the filings of its
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; pre-approving the independent accountants'
engagement to render audit and/or permissible non-audit services; and evaluating
the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent accountants.
The Audit Committee is presently composed of three persons: Messrs. Anderson,
Cooper and Stark, each of whom is not an "interested person" as defined in the
1940 Act and is considered independent under the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC. The Company's Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Stark
is an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined under Item 407
of Regulation S-K and Mr. Stark serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval responsibilities to one or
more of its members. The member(s) to whom such responsibility is delegated must
report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Messrs. Stark, Anderson and Cooper were
added to the Audit Committee concurrent with their election to the Board of
Directors on September 4, 2008, September 15, 2008 and February 12, 2009,
respectively.
The
function of the Audit Committee is oversight. Our management is primarily
responsible for maintaining appropriate systems for accounting and financial
reporting principles and policies and internal controls
and
procedures that provide for compliance with accounting standards and applicable
laws and regulations. The independent accountants are primarily responsible for
planning and carrying out a proper audit of our annual financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting standards. The independent
accountants are accountable to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee,
as representatives of our stockholders. The Board of Directors and the Audit
Committee have the ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate
and, where appropriate, replace our independent accountants (subject, if
applicable, to stockholder ratification).
In
fulfilling their responsibilities, it is recognized that members of the Audit
Committee are not our full-time employees or management and are not, and do not
represent themselves to be, accountants or auditors by profession. As such, it
is not the duty or the responsibility of the Audit Committee or its members to
conduct "field work" or other types of auditing or accounting reviews or
procedures, to determine that the financial statements are complete and accurate
and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or to set
auditor independence standards. Each member of the Audit Committee is entitled
to rely on (a) the integrity of those persons within and outside us and
management from which it receives information; (b) the accuracy of the financial
and other information provided to the Audit Committee absent actual knowledge to
the contrary (which is required to be promptly reported to the Board of
Directors); and (c) statements made by our officers and employees, our
Investment Adviser or other third parties as to any information technology,
internal audit and other non-audit services provided by the independent
accountants to us.
The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, or the Nominating and Governance Committee, is responsible for
selecting qualified nominees to be elected to the Board of Directors by
stockholders; selecting qualified nominees to fill any vacancies on the Board of
Directors or a committee thereof; developing and recommending to the Board of
Directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;
overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors and management; and
undertaking such other duties and responsibilities as may from time to time be
delegated by the Board of Directors to the Nominating and Governance Committee.
The Nominating and Governance Committee is presently composed of three persons:
Messrs. Anderson, Cooper and Stark, each of whom is not an "interested person"
as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act and Mr. Anderson serves as the
Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Messrs. Stark, Anderson and
Cooper were added to the Nominating and Governance Committee concurrent with
their election to the Board of Directors on September 4, 2008, September 15,
2008 and February 12, 2009, respectively.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee will consider stockholder recommendations
for possible nominees for election as directors when such recommendations are
submitted in accordance with the Company's bylaws and any applicable law, rule
or regulation regarding director nominations. Nominations should be sent to the
Corporate Secretary, c/o Prospect Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th
Floor, New York, New York 10016. When submitting a nomination to the Company for
consideration, a stockholder must provide all information that would be required
under applicable SEC rules to be disclosed in connection with election of a
director, including the following minimum information for each director nominee:
full name, age and address; principal occupation during the past five years;
current directorships on publicly held companies and investment companies;
number of shares of our common stock owned, if any; and, a written consent of
the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board of Directors and
to serve if elected by the stockholders. Criteria considered by the Nominating
and Governance Committee in evaluating the qualifications of individuals for
election as members of the Board of Directors include compliance with the
independence and other applicable requirements of the Marketplace Rules of
NASDAQ and the 1940 Act and all other applicable laws, rules, regulations and
listing standards, the criteria, policies and principles set forth in the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and the ability to
contribute to the effective management of the Company, taking into account our
needs and such factors as the individual's experience, perspective, skills,
expertise and knowledge of the industries in which the Company operates,
personal and professional integrity, character, business judgment, time
availability in light of other commitments, dedication and conflicts of
interest. The Nominating and Governance Committee also may consider such other
factors as it may deem to be in our best interests and those of our
stockholders. The Board of Directors also believes it is appropriate for certain
key members of our management to participate as members of the Board of
Directors.
Corporate
Governance
Corporate Governance
Guidelines
. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance
Guidelines on behalf of the Company. These Corporate Governance Guidelines
address, among other things, the following key corporate governance topics:
director responsibilities; the size, composition, and membership criteria of the
Board of Directors; composition and responsibilities of directors serving on
committees of the Board of Directors; director access to officers, employees,
and independent advisors; director orientation and continuing education;
director compensation; and an annual performance evaluation of the Board of
Directors.
Code of
Conduct
. We have adopted a code of conduct which applies to,
among others, our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as well as all of our employees. Our code of conduct is
an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, and can be
accessed via the Internet site of the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. We intend to
disclose amendments to or waivers from a required provision of the code of
conduct on Form 8-K.
Code of
Ethics
. We, Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under
the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts
certain personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to each code may
invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are
made in accordance with the code's requirements.
Internal Reporting and Whistle
Blower Protection Policy
. The Company's Audit Committee has
established guidelines and procedures regarding the receipt, retention and
treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters, collectively, Accounting Matters, and the confidential,
anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable
accounting or auditing matters. Persons with complaints or concerns regarding
Accounting Matters may submit their complaints to our Chief Compliance Officer,
or CCO. Persons who are uncomfortable submitting complaints to the CCO,
including complaints involving the CCO, may submit complaints directly to our
Audit Committee Chairman. Complaints may be submitted on an anonymous
basis.
The
CCO may be contacted at: Prospect Capital Corporation, Chief Compliance Officer,
10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, New York 10016.
The
Audit Committee Chairman may be contacted at: Prospect Capital Corporation,
Audit Committee Chairman, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, New York
10016.
Independent
Directors
The
Board of Directors, in connection with the 1940 Act and the applicable
Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ, has considered the independence of members of the
Board of Directors who are not employed by Prospect Capital Management and has
concluded that Messrs. Anderson, Cooper and Stark are not "interested persons"
as defined by the 1940 Act and therefore qualify as independent directors under
the standards promulgated by the Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ. In reaching this
conclusion, the Board of Directors concluded that Messrs. Anderson, Cooper and
Stark had no relationships with Prospect Capital Management or any of its
affiliates, other than their positions as directors of the Company and, if
applicable, investments in us that are on the same terms as those of other
stockholders.
Proxy
Voting Policies And Procedures
We
have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Prospect Capital Management.
The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Prospect Capital Management and our
non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change. See
"Regulation — Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures."
Compensation
of Directors and Officers
The
following table sets forth information regarding the compensation received by
the directors and executive officers from the Company for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009. No compensation is paid to the interested directors by the
Company.
|
|
|
Aggregate
Compensation from the Company
|
|
Pension
or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of the Company's
Expenses(1)
|
|
Total
Compensation Paid to Director/ Officer
|
|
|
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
F. Barry(2)
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
M.
Grier Eliasek(2)
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graham
D.S. Anderson(3)
|
|
$
|
67,750
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
67,750
|
|
|
Andrew
C. Cooper(4)
|
|
$
|
32,381
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
32,381
|
|
|
Eugene
S. Stark(5)
|
|
$
|
70,500
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
70,500
|
|
|
Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
E. Vastardis(6,7)
|
|
|
—
|
|
None
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Brian
H. Oswald(2)
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
We
do not have a bonus, profit sharing or retirement plan, and directors do
not receive any pension or retirement benefits.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
We
have not paid, and we do not intend to pay, any annual cash compensation
to our executive officers for their services as executive officers.
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek are compensated by Prospect Capital Management
from the income Prospect Capital Management receives under the management
agreement between Prospect Capital Management and us. Mr. Oswald is
compensated by Prospect Administration from the income Prospect
Administration receives under the Administration
Agreement.
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Mr.
Anderson joined our Board of Directors on September 15,
2008.
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Mr.
Cooper joined our Board of Directors on February 12,
2009.
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Mr.
Stark joined our Board of Directors on September 4,
2008.
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Mr.
Vastardis is no longer employed by the Company, but served as Chief
Compliance Officer from January 4, 2005 through September 30, 2008, and
served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from April 30, 2005
through November 11, 2008. Mr. Vastardis served as Secretary from April
30, 2005 through June 6, 2008.
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
The
compensation of William E. Vastardis for his service as Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company was paid by Vastardis Fund Services
LLC, formerly our sub-administrator. Vastardis Fund Services was in turn
paid by the Company at a monthly minimum rate of $33,333.33 or annual fees
on gross assets of 0.20% on the first $250 million, 0.15% on the next $250
million, 0.10% on the next $250 million, 0.075% on the next $250 million
and 0.05% over one billion. The compensation of William E. Vastardis for
his service as Chief Compliance Officer of the Company was paid by
Vastardis Compliance Services LLC. Vastardis Compliance Services LLC was
in turn paid by the Company at a monthly rate of $6,250. In addition, the
Company paid Vastardis Compliance Services LLC for certain other services
at the rate of $270 per hour. Both Vastardis Fund Services LLC and
Vastardis Compliance Services LLC determined the compensation to be paid
to Mr. Vastardis with respect to the Company based on a case-by-case
evaluation of the time and resources that is required to fulfill his
duties to the Company. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, the
Company paid Vastardis Compliance Services LLC $25,000 for services
rendered by Mr. Vastardis as Chief
Compliance
|
|
|
Officer.
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, the Company paid Vastardis Fund
Services LLC approximately $827,083 for services required to be provided
by Prospect Administration, including, but not limited to, (a) clerical,
bookkeeping and record keeping services, (b) conducting relations with
custodians, depositories, transfer agents and other third-party service
providers and (c) furnishing reports to Prospect Administration and the
Board of Directors of the Company of its performance of obligations. In
addition, the fees paid to Vastardis Fund Service LLC cover the services
rendered by Mr. Vastardis as our Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer.
|
Effective
July 1, 2008, the independent directors received an annual fee of $90,000 plus
reimbursement of any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred. The chairman of
the Audit Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $7,500 and
the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an
additional annual cash retainer of $5,000. Effective September 15, 2008, the
independent directors who do not serve on any committees of the board receive an
annual fee of $11,250.
Effective
October 1, 2008, the independent directors who serve on a committee of the Board
receive an annual fee of $85,000 plus reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred and committee chairmen no longer receive any
additional compensation.
Effective
January 12, 2009, the independent directors who serve on both committees of the
Board receive an annual fee of $85,000 plus reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred, the independent directors who serve on one
committee of the Board receive an annual fee of $60,000 plus reimbursement of
any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred and the independent directors who
do not serve on any committees of the board receive an annual fee of $11,250. No
compensation was paid to directors who are interested persons of the Company as
defined in 1940 Act. In addition, the Company purchases directors' and officers'
liability insurance on behalf of the directors and officers. Through
December 31, 2009, each of the three independent directors has been paid $42,500
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.
Management
Services
Investment
Advisory Agreement
We
have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital
Management under which the Investment Adviser, subject to the overall
supervision of our Board of Directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and
provides investment advisory services to, us. Under the terms of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, our Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of
our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the
manner of implementing such changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates
the structure of the investments we make (including performing due diligence on
our prospective portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and monitors investments
we make.
Prospect
Capital Management's services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not
exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long
as its services to us are not impaired. For providing these services the
Investment Adviser receives a fee from us, consisting of two components: a base
management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an
annual rate of 2% on our gross assets (including amounts borrowed). For services
rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management fee is
payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is calculated based on the
average value of our gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed
calendar quarters and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current calendar quarter. Base management fees for any
partial month or quarter are appropriately prorated.
The
incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income incentive fee, which is
payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 20% of the excess, if any, of our
pre-incentive fee net investment income that exceeds a 1.75% quarterly (7%
annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a "catch up" provision measured as of the
end of each calendar
quarter.
In the three months ended December 31, 2009, we paid an incentive fee of $4.23
million (see calculation below). For this purpose, pre-incentive fee
net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other
income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and
consulting fees and other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued
during the calendar quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter
(including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Administration
Agreement described below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any
issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee).
Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments
with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt
instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued
income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or
unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net
investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets
at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
"hurdle rate" of 1.75% per quarter (7% annualized).
We
expect the incentive fees we pay to increase to the extent we earn greater
interest and dividend income through our investments in portfolio companies and,
to a lesser extent, realize capital gains upon the sale of warrants or other
equity investments in our portfolio companies and to decrease if our interest
and dividend income and capital gains decrease. The "catch-up" provision
requires us to pay 100% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but
is less than 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming an annualized hurdle rate of 7%). The catch-up provision is
meant to provide Prospect Capital Management with 20% of our pre-incentive fee
net investment income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our pre-incentive
fee net investment income exceeds 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any
calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming an annualized hurdle rate of 7%).
The income incentive fee will be computed and paid on income that may include
interest that is accrued but not yet received in cash. If interest income is
accrued but never paid, the Board of Directors would decide to write off the
accrual in the quarter when the accrual is determined to be uncollectible. The
write off would cause a decrease in interest income for the quarter equal to the
amount of the prior accrual. The Investment Adviser is not under any obligation
to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on
accrued income that we never receive as a result of a default by an entity on
the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such income.
The
net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also
included in the amount of the gross assets used to calculate the 2% base
management fee. We pay the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows:
|
|
·
|
no
incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net
investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate;
|
|
|
·
|
100.00%
of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that
portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that
exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized
hurdle rate); and
|
|
|
·
|
20.00%
of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that
exceeds 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle
rate).
|
These
calculations are appropriately prorated for any period of less than three months
and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current
quarter.
The
second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, is determined
and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination
of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20% of our realized capital gains for the calendar year, if any, computed net of
all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of
such year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee
payable
to the Investment Adviser, we calculate the aggregate realized capital gains,
aggregate realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation,
as applicable, with respect to each investment that has been in our portfolio.
For the purpose of this calculation, an "investment" is defined as the total of
all rights and claims which may be asserted against a portfolio company arising
out of our participation in the debt, equity, and other financial instruments
issued by that company. Aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum
of the differences between the aggregate net sales price of each investment and
the aggregate cost basis of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed.
Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the
aggregate net sales price of each investment is less than the aggregate cost
basis of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation equals the sum of the differences, if negative, between the
aggregate valuation of each investment and the aggregate cost basis of such
investment as of the applicable calendar year-end. At the end of the applicable
calendar year, the amount of capital gains that serves as the basis for our
calculation of the capital gains incentive fee involves netting aggregate
realized capital gains against aggregate realized capital losses on a
since-inception basis and then reducing this amount by the aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation. If this number is positive, then the capital gains
incentive fee payable is equal to 20% of such amount, less the aggregate amount
of any capital gains incentive fees paid since inception.
The
following is a calculation of the most recently paid incentive fee paid in
January 2010 (for the quarter ended December 31, 2009) (in
thousands):
|
Prior
Quarter Net Asset Value (adjusted for stock offerings during the
quarter)
|
|
$
|
637,507
|
|
|
Quarterly
Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
Current
Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
11,156
|
|
|
125%
of the Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
2.1875
|
%
|
|
125%
of the Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
13,945
|
|
|
Current
Quarter Pre Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
21,156
|
|
|
Incentive
Fee — "Catch-Up"
|
|
$
|
2,789
|
|
|
Incentive
Fee — 20% in excess of 125% of the Current Quarter
Hurdle
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
|
Total
Current Quarter Incentive Fee
|
|
$
|
4,231
|
|
The
total base management fees earned by and paid to Prospect Capital Management
during the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007
were $11.9 million, $8.9 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The total base
management fees earned by and paid to Prospect Capital Management for the six
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009 were $6.4 million and $5.7
million, respectively.
The
income incentive fees were $14.8 million, $11.3 million and $5.8 million for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively. No capital gains incentive fees were earned for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007. The total income incentive
fees for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $7.3
million and $8.9 million, respectively.
The
total investment advisory fees were $26.7 million, $20.2 million and $11.2
million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30,
2007, respectively. The total investment advisory fees for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $13.7 million and $14.6 million,
respectively.
Because
of the structure of the incentive fee, it is possible that we may have to pay an
incentive fee in a quarter where we incur a loss. For example, if we receive
pre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate for a
quarter, we will pay the applicable income incentive fee even if we have
incurred negative total return in that quarter due to realized or unrealized
losses on our investments.
Examples
of Quarterly Incentive Fee Calculation
Example
1: Income Incentive Fee(*):
Alternative
1
Assumptions
Investment
income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%
Hurdle
rate(1) = 1.75%
Base
management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other
expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) =
0.20%
(*) The
hypothetical amount of pre-incentive fee net investment income shown is based on
a percentage of total net assets.
|
|
(1
)
|
Represents
7% annualized hurdle rate
|
|
|
(2
)
|
Represents
2% annualized base management fee.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes
organizational and offering
expenses.
|
Pre-incentive
fee net investment income (investment income — (base management fee + other
expenses)) = 0.55%
Pre-incentive
net investment income does not exceed hurdle rate, therefore there is no income
incentive fee.
Alternative
2
Assumptions
Investment
income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 2.70%
Hurdle
rate(1) = 1.75%
Base
management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other
expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) =
0.20%
Pre-incentive
fee net investment income (investment income — (base management fee + other
expenses)) = 2%
Pre-incentive
net investment income exceeds hurdle rate, therefore there is an income
incentive fee payable by us to our Investment Adviser.
|
Income
incentive Fee
|
=
100% × "Catch Up" + the greater of 0% AND (20% × (pre-incentive fee net
investment income
- 2.1875%)
|
|
|
=
(100% × (2% - 1.75%)) + 0%
|
|
|
=
100% × 0.25% + 0%
|
|
|
=
0.25%
|
Alternative
3
Assumptions
Investment
income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3%
Hurdle
rate(1) = 1.75%
Base
management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other
expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) =
0.20%
Pre-incentive
fee net investment income (investment income — (base management fee + other
expenses)) = 2.30%
Pre-incentive
net investment income exceeds hurdle rate, therefore there is an income
incentive fee payable by us to our Investment Adviser.
|
Income
incentive Fee
|
=
100% × "Catch Up" + the greater of 0% AND (20% × (pre-incentive fee net
investment income - 2.1875%)
|
|
|
=
(100% × (2.1875% - 1.75%)) + the greater of 0% AND (20% × (2.30% -
2.1875%))
|
|
|
=
(100% × 0.4375%) + (20% × 0.1125%)
|
|
|
=
0.4375% + 0.0225%
|
|
|
=
0.46%
|
Example
2: Capital Gains Incentive Fee:
Alternative
1
Assumptions
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: $20
million investment made
|
|
|
·
|
Year 2
: Fair
market value, or FMV of investment determined to be $22
million
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
7% annualized hurdle rate.
|
|
(2)
|
Re
presents 2% annualized base management fee.
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes
organizational and offering expenses.
|
|
|
·
|
Year 3
: FMV
of investment determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year
4
: Investment sold for $21
million
|
The
impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the incentive fee would
be:
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: No
impact
|
|
|
·
|
Year 2
: No
impact
|
|
|
·
|
Year
3
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (unrealized capital
depreciation)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
4
: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $4 million ($1 million of realized capital
gain and $3 million reversal in unrealized capital
depreciation)
|
Alternative
2
Assumptions
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: $20
million investment made
|
|
|
·
|
Year 2
: FMV
of investment determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year 3
: FMV
of investment determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year 4
: FMV
of investment determined to be $21 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year 5
: FMV
of investment determined to be $18 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year
6
: Investment sold for $15
million
|
The
impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the incentive fee would
be:
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: No
impact
|
|
|
·
|
Year
2
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (unrealized capital
depreciation)
|
|
|
·
|
Year 3
: No
impact
|
|
|
·
|
Year
4
: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (reversal in unrealized capital
depreciation)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
5
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $2 million (unrealized capital
depreciation)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
6
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million ($5 million of realized capital
loss offset by a $2 million reversal in unrealized capital
depreciation)
|
Alternative
3
Assumptions
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: $20
million investment made in company A, or Investment A, and $20 million
investment made in company B, or Investment B
|
|
|
·
|
Year 2
: FMV
of Investment A is determined to be $21 million, and Investment B is sold
for $18 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year
3
: Investment A is sold for $23
million
|
The
impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the incentive fee would
be:
|
|
·
|
Year
2
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $2 million (realized capital loss on
Investment B)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
3
: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (realized capital gain on
Investment A)
|
Alternative
4
Assumptions
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: $20
million investment made in company A, or Investment A, and $20 million
investment made in company B, or Investment B
|
|
|
·
|
Year 2
: FMV
of Investment A is determined to be $21 million, and FMV of Investment B
is determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year 3
: FMV
of Investment A is determined to be $18 million, and FMV of Investment B
is determined to be $18 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year 4
: FMV
of Investment A is determined to be $19 million, and FMV of Investment B
is determined to be $21 million
|
|
|
·
|
Year
5
: Investment A is sold for $17 million, and Investment
B is sold for $23 million
|
The
impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the incentive fee would
be:
|
|
·
|
Year 1
: No
impact
|
|
|
·
|
Year
2
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (unrealized capital depreciation
on Investment B)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
3
: Decrease base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $1 million ($2 million in unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment A and $1 million recovery in unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
4
: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million ($1 million recovery in
unrealized capital depreciation on Investment A and $2 million recovery in
unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
·
|
Year
5
: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $1 million ($3 million realized capital
gain on Investment B offset by $3 million realized capital loss on
Investment A plus a $1 million reversal in unrealized capital depreciation
on Investment A from Year 4)
|
Payment
of our expenses
All
investment professionals of the Investment Adviser and its staff, when and to
the extent engaged in providing investment advisory and management services, and
the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to
such services, will be provided and paid for by the Investment Adviser. We bear
all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including those
relating to: organization and offering; calculation of our net asset value
(including the cost and expenses of any independent valuation firm); expenses
incurred by Prospect Capital Management payable to third parties, including
agents, consultants or other advisers (such as independent valuation firms,
accountants and legal counsel), in monitoring our financial and legal affairs
and in monitoring our investments and performing due diligence on our
prospective portfolio companies; interest payable on debt, if any, and dividends
payable on preferred stock, if any, incurred to finance our
investments;
offerings
of our debt, our preferred shares, our common stock and other securities;
investment advisory fees; fees payable to third parties, including agents,
consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with, evaluating and
making investments; transfer agent and custodial fees; registration fees;
listing fees; taxes; independent directors' fees and expenses; costs of
preparing and filing reports or other documents with the SEC; the costs of any
reports, proxy statements or other notices to stockholders, including printing
costs; our allocable portion of the fidelity bond, directors and officers/errors
and omissions liability insurance, and any other insurance premiums; direct
costs and expenses of administration, including auditor and legal costs; and all
other expenses incurred by us, by our Investment Adviser or by Prospect
Administration in connection with administering our business, such as our
allocable portion of overhead under the Administration Agreement, including rent
and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief
financial officer and his staff, including the internal legal
staff.
Duration
and termination
The
Investment Advisory Agreement was originally approved by our Board of Directors
on June 23, 2004 and was recently re-approved by the Board of Directors on June
17, 2009 for an additional one-year term expiring June 24, 2010. Unless
terminated earlier as described below, it will remain in effect from year to
year thereafter if approved annually by our Board of Directors or by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting
securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our directors
who are not interested persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will
automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The Investment Advisory
Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon not more than
60 days' written notice to the other. See "Risk factors — Risks Relating to Our
Business — We are dependent upon Prospect Capital Management's key management
personnel for our future success."
Administration
Agreement
We
have also entered into an Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration
under which Prospect Administration, among other things, provides (or arranges
for the provision of) administrative services and facilities for us. For
providing these services, we reimburse Prospect Administration for our allocable
portion of overhead incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer
and his staff, including the internal legal staff. Under this agreement,
Prospect Administration furnishes us with office facilities, equipment and
clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect
Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required
administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible
for the financial records that we are required to maintain and preparing reports
to our stockholders and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration assists us in
determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the preparation and
filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the
performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by
others. Under the Administration Agreement, Prospect Administration also
provides on our behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to
which we are required to provide such assistance. The Administration Agreement
may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days' written notice
to the other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our
Investment Adviser.
Prospect
Administration previously engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC ("Vastardis") to
serve as our sub-administrator to perform certain services required of Prospect
Administration. On April 30, 2009 we gave a 60-day notice to Vastardis of
termination of our agreement for Vastardis to provide sub-administration
services effective June 30, 2009. We entered into a new consulting services
agreement for the period from July 1, 2009 until the filing of our Form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 2009. We paid Vastardis a total of $30,000 for services
rendered in conjunction with preparation of Form 10-K under the new agreement.
All administration services were assumed by Prospect Administration effective
September 14, 2009.
We
reimbursed Prospect Administration $2.9 million, $2.1 million and $0.5 million
for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively, for services it provided to the Company at cost.
Indemnification
The
Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad
faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the
reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, Prospect Capital Management
and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification
from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys' fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the
rendering of Prospect Capital Management's services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.
The
Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless
disregard of its duties and obligations, Prospect Administration and its
officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members
and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administration's services under the
Administration Agreement or otherwise as our administrator.
Under
the sub-administration agreement
(which, as described above, was terminated as of June 30, 2009),
Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons,
members, and any other person or entity affiliated with Vastardis, are not
liable to the Administrator or to us for any action taken or omitted to be taken
by Vastardis in connection with the performance of any of its duties or
obligations or otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on our
behalf. The agreement also provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith
or negligence in the performance of Vastardis' duties or by reason of the
reckless disregard of Vastardis' duties and obligations, Vastardis and its
officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and any
other person or entity affiliated with Vastardis are entitled to indemnification
from the Administrator and us. All damages, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
incurred in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit,
investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the
right of the Administrator or us or our security holders) arising out of or
otherwise based upon the performance of any of Vastardis' duties or obligations
under the agreement or otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on
our behalf.
Board
of Directors approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement
On
June 17, 2009, our Board of Directors voted unanimously to renew the Investment
Advisory Agreement for the 12-month period ending June 24, 2010. In its
consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors
focused on information it had received relating to, among other things: (a) the
nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to
us by Prospect Capital Management; (b) comparative data with respect to advisory
fees or expense ratios paid by other business development companies with similar
investment objectives; (c) our projected operating expenses; (d) the projected
profitability of Prospect Capital Management and any existing and potential
sources of indirect income to Prospect Capital Management or Prospect
Administration from their relationships with us and the profitability of those
relationships; (e) information about the services to be performed and the
personnel performing such services under the Investment Advisory Agreement; (f)
the organizational capability and financial condition of Prospect Capital
Management and its affiliates and (g) the possibility of obtaining similar
services from other third party service providers or through an internally
managed structure. In approving the renewal of the Investment Advisory
Agreement, the Board of Directors, including all of the directors who are not
"interested persons," considered the following:
|
|
·
|
Nature, Quality and Extent of
Services
. The Board of Directors considered the nature,
extent and quality of the investment selection process employed by
Prospect Capital Management. The Board of Directors also considered
Prospect Capital Management's personnel and their prior experience in
connection with the types of investments made by us. The Board of
Directors concluded that the services to be provided under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are generally the same as those of comparable business
development companies described in the available market
data.
|
|
|
·
|
Investment
Performance
. The Board of Directors reviewed our
investment performance as well as comparative data with respect to the
investment performance of other externally managed business development
companies. The Board of Directors concluded that Prospect Capital
Management was delivering results consistent with our investment objective
and that our investment performance was satisfactory when compared to
comparable business development companies.
|
|
|
·
|
The reasonableness of the fees
paid to Prospect Capital Management
. The Board of
Directors considered comparative data based on publicly available
information on other business development companies with respect to
services rendered and the advisory fees (including the management fees and
incentive fees) of other business development companies as well as our
projected operating expenses and expense ratio compared to other business
development companies. The Board of Directors, on behalf of the Company,
also considered the profitability of Prospect Capital Management. Based
upon its review, the Board of Directors concluded that the fees to be paid
under the Investment Advisory Agreement are reasonable compared to other
business development companies.
|
|
|
·
|
Economies of
Scale
. The Board of Directors considered information
about the potential of Prospect Capital Management to realize economies of
scale in managing our assets, and determined that at this time there were
not economies of scale to be realized by Prospect Capital
Management.
|
Based
on the information reviewed and the discussions detailed above, the Board of
Directors (including all of the directors who are not "interested persons")
concluded that the investment advisory fee rates and terms are fair and
reasonable in relation to the services provided and approved the renewal of the
Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital Management as being in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Portfolio
Managers
The
following individuals function as portfolio managers primarily responsible for
the day-to-day management of our portfolio. Our portfolio managers are not
responsible for day-to-day management of any other accounts. For a description
of their principal occupations for the past five years, see above.
|
|
|
|
|
Length
of Service
with
Company (Years)
|
|
John
F. Barry
|
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
5
|
|
M.
Grier Eliasek
|
|
President
and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
5
|
Mr.
Eliasek receives no compensation from the Company. Mr. Eliasek receives a salary
and bonus from Prospect Capital Management that takes into account his role as a
senior officer of the Company and of Prospect Capital Management, his
performance and the performance of each of Prospect Capital Management and the
Company. Mr. Barry receives no compensation from the Company. Mr. Barry, as the
sole member of Prospect Capital Management, receives a salary and/or bonus from
Prospect Capital Management and is entitled to equity distributions after all
other obligations of Prospect Capital Management are met.
The
following table sets forth the dollar range of our common stock beneficially
owned by each of the portfolio managers described above as of June 30,
2009.
|
|
|
Aggregate
Dollar Range of
Common
Stock Beneficially Owned
by
Prospect Capital Management
|
|
John
F. Barry
|
Over
$100,000
|
|
M.
Grier Eliasek
|
Over
$100,000
|
Managerial
Assistance
As
a business development company, we offer, and must provide upon request,
managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. This assistance
could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our portfolio
companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and
advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and
financial guidance. We billed $846,000, $1,027,000, and $505,000 of managerial
assistance fees for the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, and June 30,
2007, respectively, of which $60,000 and $380,000 remains on the consolidated
statement of assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2009, and June 30, 2008,
respectively. These fees are paid to the Administrator so we simultaneously
accrue a payable to the Administrator for the same amounts, which remain on the
consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
License
Agreement
We
entered into a license agreement with Prospect Capital Management, pursuant to
which Prospect Capital Management agreed to grant us a nonexclusive, royalty
free license to use the name "Prospect Capital." Under this agreement, we have a
right to use the Prospect Capital name, for so long as Prospect Capital
Management or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than
with respect to this limited license, we have no legal right to the Prospect
Capital name. This license agreement will remain in effect for so long as the
Investment Advisory Agreement with our Investment Adviser is in
effect.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
We
have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital
Management. Our Chairman of the Board of Directors is the sole member of and
controls Prospect Capital Management. Our senior management may in the future
also serve as principals of other investment managers affiliated with Prospect
Capital Management that may in the future manage investment funds with
investment objectives similar to ours. In addition, our executive officers and
directors and the principals of Prospect Capital Management may serve as
officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or
related lines of business as we do or of investment funds managed by affiliates.
Accordingly, we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain
investments made by investment funds managed by advisers affiliated with
Prospect Capital Management. However, our Investment Adviser and other members
of the affiliated present and predecessor companies of Prospect Capital
Management intend to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable
manner consistent with our investment objectives and strategies so that we are
not disadvantaged in relation to any other client. See "Risk Factors — Risks
Relating To Our Business — Potential conflicts of interest could impact our
investment returns."
In
addition, pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement, Prospect
Administration provides, or arranges to provide, the Company with the office
facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day
operations. Prospect Capital Management is the sole member of and controls
Prospect Administration.
We
have no intention of investing in any portfolio company in which Prospect
Capital Management or any affiliate currently has an investment.
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
As
of February 25, 2010, there were no persons that owned 25% or more of our
outstanding voting securities, and we believe no person should be deemed to
control us, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act.
The
following table sets forth, as of February 25, 2010, certain ownership
information with respect to our common stock for those persons who directly or
indirectly own, control or hold with the power to vote, 5% or more
of
our outstanding common stock and all officers and directors, as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners set forth in the
tables below have sole voting and investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
Common
Stock
Outstanding(1)
|
|
Prospect
Capital Management LLC(2)
|
Record
and beneficial
|
|
968,251
|
|
1.52%
|
|
All
officers and directors as a group (6 persons)(3)
|
Record
and beneficial
|
|
1,940,391
|
|
3.05%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Does
not reflect shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon any exercise
of any underwriters' overallotment option.
|
|
|
(2)
|
John
F. Barry is a control person of Prospect Capital
Management.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
shares of common stock held by Prospect Capital Management. Because John
F. Barry controls Prospect Capital Management, he may be deemed to be the
beneficial owner of shares of our common stock held by Prospect Capital
Management. The address for all officers and directors is c/o Prospect
Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY
10016.
|
The
following table sets forth the dollar range of our equity securities
beneficially owned by each of our directors and officers as of December 31,
2009. We are not part of a "family of investment companies" as that term is
defined in the 1940 Act.
Name
of Director or Officer
|
|
Dollar
Range of Equity
Securities
in the Company(1)
|
|
|
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
Graham
D.S. Anderson
|
|
$
|
50,001
— $100,000
|
|
|
Andrew
C. Cooper
|
|
none
|
|
|
Eugene
S. Stark
|
|
$
|
50,001
— $100,000
|
|
|
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
F. Barry III(2)
|
|
Over
$100,000
|
|
|
M.
Grier Eliasek
|
|
Over
$100,000
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
H. Oswald
|
|
$
|
50,001
— $100,000
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Dollar
ranges are as follows: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000
or over $100,000.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Represents
an indirect beneficial ownership in shares of our common stock, that are
beneficially owned directly by Prospect Capital Management, by reason of
Mr. Barry's position as a control person of Prospect Capital
Management.
|
PORTFOLIO
COMPANIES
The
following is a listing of our portfolio companies at December 31, 2009. Values
are as of December 31, 2009.
The
portfolio companies are presented in three categories: "companies more than 25%
owned" are portfolio companies in which Prospect directly or indirectly owns
more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and, therefore, such portfolio company is presumed to be controlled by us under
the 1940 Act; "companies owned 5% to 25%" are portfolio companies where Prospect
directly or indirectly owns 5% to 25% of the outstanding voting securities of
such portfolio company and/or holds one or more seats on the portfolio company's
Board of Directors and, therefore, such portfolio company is deemed to be an
affiliated person with us under the 1940 Act; "companies less than 5% owned" are
portfolio companies where Prospect directly or indirectly owns less than 5% of
the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company and where it has no
other affiliations with such portfolio company. As of December 31, 2009,
Prospect owned 100.00% of the fully diluted common equity of GSHI, 100.00% of
the common equity of CCEHI, 49.00% of the fully diluted common equity of
Integrated, 79.83% of the fully diluted common equity of Iron Horse, 100.00% of
the members unit of AWCNC, LLC, 100.00% of the common equity of Coalbed, Inc.,
100.00% of the fully diluted equity of Freedom Marine Holdings Inc., 79.40% of
the fully diluted equity of Nupla Corporation, 80.00% of the fully diluted
common equity of NRG, 40.00% of the fully diluted equity of Sidump’r Trailer
Company, Inc., 74.51% of the fully diluted equity of R-V, 78.11% of the fully
diluted common equity of Ajax and 100.00% of the fully diluted common equity of
Yatesville. Prospect makes available significant managerial assistance to its
portfolio companies. Prospect generally requests and may receive rights to
observe the meetings of its portfolio companies' Boards of
Directors.
Name
of Portfolio
Company
|
Nature
of its
Principal
Business
(Location)
|
Title
and Class of
Securities
Held
|
|
|
Equity
Securities
Held,
at
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Companies
more than 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax
Rolled Ring and Machine
|
Manufacturing
(South Carolina)
|
Senior
secured debt, subordinated secured debt, preferred stock and common
equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Preferred shares; Senior secured note Tranche A, 10.50% due
4/01/2013; Subordinated secured note Tranche B, 11.50% plus 6.00% PIK due
4/01/2013; Subordinated secured note Tranche B, 15.00% due
10/30/2010
|
0.0
|
25.8
|
|
AWCNC,
LLC
|
Machinery
(North Carolina)
|
Members
Units
|
N/A
|
Members
units
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
C&J
Cladding LLC
|
Metal
services (Texas)
|
Warrants
|
N/A
— loan repaid
|
Warrants,
common shares, expiring 3/30/2014
|
3.1
|
0.0
|
|
Change
Clean Energy Holdings, Inc
|
Biomass
power (Maine)
|
Common
equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares
|
2.0
|
0.0
|
|
Coalbed,
Inc. / Coalbed, LLC
|
Oil
& Gas Production (Tennessee)
|
Senior
secured debt and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Senior secured note, 14.50%, in non-accrual status effective
10/21/2009 due 6/30/2010
|
0.0
|
3.7
|
|
Fischbein,
LLC
|
Machinery
(North Carolina)
|
Senior
subordinated debt and membership interests
|
Second
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Membership
interests; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus 6.50% PIK due
5/01/2013
|
1.9
|
3.5
|
|
Freedom
Marine Services LLC
|
Shipping
vessels (Louisiana)
|
Subordinated
secured debt and net profit interest
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Net
profit interest, 22.50%; Subordinated secured note, 16.00% PIK due
12/31/2011
|
0.0
|
6.2
|
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings,
Inc.
|
Gas
gathering and processing (Texas)
|
Senior
and junior secured debt and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Senior secured note, 18.00% due 12/22/2018; Junior secured note,
18.00% due 12/23/2018
|
55.2
|
30.0
|
|
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.
|
Contracting
(North Carolina)
|
Senior
and junior secured debt, preferred stock and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Preferred shares; Senior and junior secured notes, 7.00% plus
7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default interest, in non-accrual status effective
10/09/2007 past due; Senior demand note, 15.00% due
12/31/2009
|
0.0
|
5.3
|
|
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
Production
services (Alberta, Canada)
|
Senior
secured debt, bridge loan and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Bridge loan, 15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, in non-accrual status
effective 5/01/2009 due 12/31/2009; Senior secured note, 15.00%, in
non-accrual status effective 5/01/2009 due 12/31/2009
|
0.0
|
12.3
|
|
NRG
Manufacturing, Inc.
|
Manufacturing
(Texas)
|
Senior
secured debt and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Senior secured note, 16.50% due 8/31/2011
|
13.6
|
13.1
|
Name
of Portfolio
Company
|
Nature
of its
Principal
Business
(Location)
|
Title
and Class of
Securities
Held
|
|
|
Equity
Securities
Held,
at
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nupla
Corporation
|
Home
& Office Furnishings, Housewares & Durable
(California)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt, senior subordinated debt, preferred
stock and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%-7.25% plus 2.00%
default interest due 9/04/2012; Senior secured Term Loan A, 8.00% plus
2.00% default interest due 9/04/2012; Senior subordinated debt, 10.00%
plus 5.00% PIK, in non-accrual status effective 4/01/2009 due
3/04/2013
|
0.0
|
2.4
|
|
R-V
Industries, Inc.
|
Manufacturing
(Pennsylvania)
|
Warrants
and common equity
|
N/A
— loan repaid
|
Common
shares; Warrants, common shares, expiring 6/30/2017
|
12.0
|
0.0
|
|
Sidump’r
Trailer Company, Inc.
|
Automobile
(Nebraska)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt, preferred stock and common
equity
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Common
shares; Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%-7.25%, in
non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008 due 1/10/2011; Senior secured Term
Loan A, 7.25%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008 due 1/10/2011;
Senior secured Term Loan B, 8.75%, in non-accrual status effective
11/01/2008 due 1/10/2011; Senior secured Term Loan C, 16.50% PIK, in
non-accrual status effective 9/27/2008 due 7/10/2011; Senior secured Term
Loan D 7.25%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008 due
7/10/2011
|
0.0
|
0.9
|
|
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.
|
Mining
and coal production (Kentucky)
|
Senior
and junior secured debt and common equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Senior secured note, 15.77% due 12/31/2010, in non-accrual status
effective 1/01/2009; Junior secured note, 15.77% due 12/31/2010, in
non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies
5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian
Energy Holdings LLC
|
Construction
services (West Virginia)
|
Senior
secured debt, warrants and preferred units
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Preferred
stock; Warrants, common shares, expiring 2/13/2016, 6/17/2018, 11/30/2018;
Senior secured note Tranche A, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008 due 1/31/2011; Senior
secured note Tranche B, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK 3.00% default interest
non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, past due
|
0.0
|
1.2
|
|
Biotronic
NeuroNetwork
|
Healthcare
(Michigan)
|
Senior
secured debt and preferred stock
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Preferred
shares; Senior secured note, 11.50% plus 1.00% PIK due
2/21/2013
|
3.5
|
27.0
|
|
Boxercraft
Incorporated
|
Textiles
& Leather (Georgia)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt, preferred stock and common
equity
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 9/16/2013;
Senior secured Term Loan A, 9.50%-10.50% due 9/16/2013; Senior secured
Term Loan B, 10.00%-11.00% due 9/16/2013; Senior secured Term Loan C,
12.00% plus 6.50% PIK due 3/16/2014
|
0.0
|
12.4
|
|
KTPS
Holdings LLC
|
Textiles
& Leather (Colorado)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt and membership
interests
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Membership
interests; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 1/31/2012; Senior secured
Term Loan A, 10.50%-11.25% due 1/31/2012; Senior secured Term Loan B,
12.00% due 1/31/2012; Senior secured Term Loan C 12.00% plus 6.00% PIK due
3/31/2012
|
0.0
|
7.2
|
|
Miller
Petroleum, Inc.
|
Oil
and gas production (Tennessee)
|
Warrants
|
N/A
— loan repaid
|
Warrants,
expiring 5/04/2010 through 12/31/2014
|
0.9
|
0.0
|
|
Smart,
LLC
|
Diversified
/ Conglomerate Service (New York)
|
Membership
interests
|
N/A
|
Membership
interests
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Sports
Helmets Holdings, LLC
|
Personal
& Nondurable Consumer Products (New York)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt, senior subordinated debt and common
equity
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Common
shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 12/14/2013; Senior secured
Term Loan A, 4.26%-6.00% due 12/14/2013; Senior secured Term Loan B,
4.76%-6.50% due 12/14/2013; Senior subordinated debt Series A, 12.00% plus
3.00% PIK due 6/14/2014; Senior subordinated debt Series B, 10.00% plus
5.00% PIK due 6/14/2014
|
0.4
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies
less than 5% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADAPCO,
Inc.
|
Ecological
(Florida)
|
Common
equity
|
N/A
|
Common
shares
|
0.3
|
0.0
|
|
Aircraft
Fasteners International, LLC
|
Machinery
(California)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior and junior secured debt and convertible preferred
stock
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Convertible
preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 11/01/2012; Senior
secured Term Loan, 3.92%-5.40% due 11/01/2012; Junior secured Term Loan,
12.00% plus 2.00% PIK due 5/01/2013
|
0.4
|
8.3
|
|
Allied
Defense Group, Inc.
|
Aerospace
& Defense (Virginia)
|
Common
equity
|
N/A
|
Common
shares
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
American
Gilsonite
Company
|
Specialty
minerals (Utah)
|
Senior
subordinated secured debt and membership interests
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Membership
interests; Senior subordinated secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due
3/14/2013
|
2.7
|
15.1
|
Name
of Portfolio
Company
|
Nature
of its
Principal
Business
(Location)
|
Title
and Class of
Securities
Held
|
|
|
Equity
Securities
Held,
at
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Arrowhead
General Insurance Agency, Inc.
|
Insurance
(California)
|
Junior
secured debt
|
Second
perfected priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Junior
secured Term Loan, 10.25% plus 2.50% PIK due 2/08/2013
|
0.0
|
3.9
|
|
Borga,
Inc.
|
Mining,
Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metal and Coal Production
(California)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt and warrants
|
First
priority lien on all assets and pledge of all stock
|
Warrants;
Revolving line of credit, 0.50%-5.00% plus 3.00% default interest due
5/06/2010; Senior secured Term Loan B, 8.50% plus 3.00% default interest
due 5/06/2010; Senior secured Term Loan C, 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK plus
3.00% default interest due 5/06/2010
|
0.0
|
2.7
|
|
Caleel
& Hayden, LLC
|
Personal
& Nondurable Consumer Products (Colorado)
|
Junior
secured debt, senior subordinated debt, common equity and
options
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Options;
Common shares; Junior secured Term Loan B, 9.75%-10.00% due 11/10/2011;
Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus 4.50% PIK due
11/10/2012
|
0.3
|
14.2
|
|
Castro
Cheese Company,
Inc.
|
Food
products (Texas)
|
Junior
secured debt
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Junior
secured note, 11.00% plus 2.00% PIK due 2/28/2013
|
0.0
|
7.6
|
|
Copernicus
Group
|
Healthcare
(North Carolina)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt, senior subordinated debt and
preferred stock
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Preferred
shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%-10.50% due 10/08/2013; Senior
secured Term Loan A, 10.50%-11.50% due 10/08/2013; Senior subordinated
debt, 12.00% plus 6.00% PIK-10.00% plus 10.00% PIK due
4/08/2014
|
0.1
|
17.2
|
|
Custom
Direct, Inc.
|
Printing
& Publishing (Maryland)
|
Senior
and junior secured debt
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Senior
secured Term Loan, 3.06% due 12/31/2013; Junior secured Term Loan 6.31%
due 12/31/2014
|
0.0
|
2.5
|
|
Deb
Shops, Inc.
|
Retail
(Pennsylvania)
|
Second
lien debt
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Second
lien note, 1.00% plus 13.00% PIK due 10/23/2014
|
0.0
|
2.3
|
|
Diamondback
Operating LP
|
Oil
and gas production (Oklahoma)
|
Net
profit interest
|
N/A
— loan repaid.
|
Net
profit interest, 15.00%
|
0.4
|
0.0
|
|
Dover
Saddlery, Inc.
|
Retail
(Massachusetts)
|
Common
equity
|
N/A
|
Common
shares
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
EXL
Acquisition Corporation
|
Electronics
(South Carolina)
|
Revolving
line of credit, Senior secured debt and common equity
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Common
shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 3/15/2012; Senior secured Term
Loan A, 3.93%-5.50% due 3/15/2011; Senior secured Term Loan B, 4.18%-5.75%
due 3/15/2012; Senior secured Term Loan C, 4.68%-6.25% due 3/15/2012;
Senior secured Term Loan D, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due
3/15/2012
|
0.8
|
13.6
|
|
Fairchild
Industrial Products, Co.
|
Electronics
(North Carolina)
|
Preferred
stock and common equity
|
N/A
|
Common
shares; Preferred shares
|
0.6
|
0.0
|
|
H&M
Oil & Gas LLC
|
Oil
and gas production (Texas)
|
Senior
secured debt and net profit interest
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Net
profit interest, 8.00%; Senior secured note, 13.00% due
6/30/2010
|
1.0
|
46.1
|
|
Hudson
Products Holdings, Inc.
|
Mining,
Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal Production
(Texas)
|
Senior
secured debt
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Senior
secured Term Loan, 8.00% due 8/24/2015
|
0.0
|
7.0
|
|
IEC
Systems LP/Advanced Rig Services LLC
("ARS")
|
Oilfield
fabrication (Texas)
|
Senior
secured debt
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Senior
secured notes 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due 11/20/2012
|
0.0
|
32.3
|
|
Impact
Products, LLC
|
Machinery
(Ohio)
|
Junior
secured debt and senior subordinated debt
|
Second
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Junior
secured Term Loan, 6.25%-8.25% due 9/09/2012; Senior subordinated debt,
10.00% plus 5.00% PIK due 9/09/2012
|
0.0
|
13.0
|
|
Label
Corp Holdings, Inc.
|
Printing
& Publishing (Nebraska)
|
Senior
secured debt
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Senior
secured Term Loan, 8.50% due 8/08/2014
|
0.0
|
5.3
|
|
LHC
Holdings Corp.
|
Healthcare
(Florida)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt, senior subordinated debt and
membership interests
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Membership
interests; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 11/30/2012; Senior secured
Term Loan A, 4.31%-5.75% due 11/30/2012; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00%
plus 2.50% PIK due 5/31/2013
|
0.2
|
6.3
|
|
Mac
& Massey Holdings, LLC
|
Food
Products (Georgia)
|
Senior
subordinated debt and common equity
|
Subordinated
lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
shares; Senior subordinated debt, 10.00% plus 5.75% PIK due
2/10/2013
|
0.2
|
6.9
|
|
Maverick
Healthcare
LLC
|
Healthcare
(Arizona)
|
Second
lien debt, preferred units and common units
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Common
units; Preferred units; Second lien debt, 12.50% plus 3.50% PIK due
4/30/2014
|
1.7
|
12.9
|
|
Northwestern
Management Services, LLC
|
Healthcare
(Florida)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior and junior secured debt and common
equity
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Common
shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 12/13/2012; Senior secured
Term Loan A, 4.24%-5.75% due 12/13/2012; Senior secured Term Loan B,
4.74%-6.25% due 12/13/2012; Junior secured Term Loan, 12.00% plus 3.00%
due 6/13/2013
|
0.4
|
7.1
|
|
Prince
Mineral Company, Inc.
|
Metal
Services and Minerals (New York)
|
Junior
secured debt and senior subordinated debt
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Junior
secured Term Loan, 5.29%-7.00% due 12/21/2012; Senior subordinated debt,
13.00% plus 1.00% due 7/21/2013
|
0.0
|
9.1
|
|
Qualitest
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
Pharmaceuticals
(Alabama)
|
Second
lien debt
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Second
lien debt, 7.78% due 4/30/2015
|
0.0
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
of Portfolio
Company
|
Nature
of its
Principal
Business
(Location)
|
Title
and Class of
Securities
Held
|
|
|
Equity
Securities
Held,
at
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional
Management
Corp.
|
Financial
services (South Carolina)
|
Second
lien debt
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Second
lien debt, 13.00% plus 2.00% PIK due 6/29/2012
|
0.0
|
24.5
|
|
R-O-M
Corporation
|
Manufacturing
(Missouri)
|
Revolving
line of credit, senior secured debt and senior subordinated
debt
|
First
priority lien on all assets and stock
|
Revolving
line of credit, 0.50% due 2/08/2013; Senior secured Term Loan a,
3.00%-4.75% due 2/08/2013; Senior secured Term Loan B, 4.50%-6.25% due
5/08/2013; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due
8/08/2013
|
0.0
|
18.7
|
|
Shearer's
Foods, Inc.
|
Food
products (Ohio)
|
Second
lien debt and membership interests
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Membership
interests; Second lien debt, 15.00% due 10/31/2013
|
4.5
|
18.2
|
|
Stryker
Energy LLC
|
Oil
and gas production (Ohio)
|
Subordinated
secured revolving credit facility and overriding royalty
interest
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Overriding
royalty interest; Subordinated secured revolving credit facility, 12.00%
due 12/01/2011
|
2.8
|
28.3
|
|
TriZetto
Group
|
Healthcare
(California)
|
Subordinated
unsecured debt
|
Unsecured
|
Subordinated
unsecured note, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK due 10/01/2016
|
0.0
|
15.8
|
|
Unitek
|
Technical
services (Pennsylvania)
|
Second
lien debt
|
Second
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Second
lien debt, 13.08% due 12/31/2013
|
0.0
|
11.7
|
|
Wind
River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
|
Oil
and gas production (Utah)
|
Senior
secured debt and net profit interest
|
First
priority lien on substantially all assets
|
Net
profit interest, 5.00%; Senior secured note, 13.00% plus 3.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 12/01/2008 due
7/31/2010
|
0.0
|
10.6
|
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
The
net asset value per share of our outstanding shares of common stock will be
determined quarterly by dividing the value of total assets minus liabilities by
the total number of shares outstanding.
In
calculating the value of our total assets, we will value investments for which
market quotations are readily available at such market quotations. Short-term
investments which mature in 60 days or less, such as U.S. Treasury bills, are
valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized cost
method involves recording a security at its cost (i.e., principal amount plus
any premium and less any discount) on the date of purchase and thereafter
amortizing/accreting that difference between the principal amount due at
maturity and cost assuming a constant yield to maturity as determined at the
time of purchase. Short-term securities which mature in more than 60 days are
valued at current market quotations by an independent pricing service or at the
mean between the bid and ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or
dealers (if available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are valued at their net
asset value as of the close of business on the day of valuation.
Most
of the investments in our portfolio do not have market quotations which are
readily available, meaning the investments do not have actively traded markets.
Debt and equity securities for which market quotations are not readily available
are valued with the assistance of an independent valuation service using a
documented valuation policy and a valuation process that is consistently applied
under the direction of our Board of Directors. For a discussion of the risks
inherent in determining the value of securities for which readily available
market values do not exist, see "Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business—
Most of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as determined in
good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty as
to the value of our portfolio investments."
The
factors that may be taken into account in valuing such investments include, as
relevant, the portfolio company's ability to make payments, its estimated
earnings and projected discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of
any collateral, the financial environment in which the portfolio company
operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly traded companies,
changes in interest rates for similar debt instruments and other relevant
factors. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of
investments that do not have readily available market quotations, the fair value
of these investments may differ significantly from the values that would have
been used had such market quotations existed for such investments, and any such
differences could be material.
As
part of the fair valuation process, the independent valuation firm engaged by
the Board of Directors performs a review of each debt and equity investment and
provides a range of values for each investment, which, along with management's
valuation recommendations, is reviewed by the Audit Committee. Management and
the independent valuation firm may adjust their preliminary evaluations to
reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews
the final valuation report and management's valuation recommendations and makes
a recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis of the
methodologies employed and the various weights that should be accorded to each
portion of the valuation as well as factors that the independent valuation firm
and management may not have included in their evaluation processes. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and undertakes a
similar analysis to determine the fair value of each investment in the portfolio
in good faith.
Determination
of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates not susceptible to
substantiation by auditing procedures. Accordingly, under current accounting
standards, the notes to our financial statements will refer to the uncertainty
with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any change in such
valuations, on our financial statements.
SALES
OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At
our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on February 12, 2009 and our 2009
annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our stockholders
approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock
at any level of discount from net asset value (NAV) per share during the
twelve-month period following such approval. In order to sell shares pursuant to
this authorization a majority of our directors who have no financial interest in
the sale and a majority of our independent directors must (a) find that the sale
is in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders, and (b)
in consultation with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a
good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior to the first
solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase such shares,
or immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price at which
such shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of such shares, less any distributing commission or discount.
Any offering of common stock below NAV per share will be designed to raise
capital for investment in accordance with our investment objective.
In
making a determination that an offering below NAV per share is in our and our
stockholders' best interests, our Board of Directors would consider a variety of
factors, including:
|
|
·
|
The
effect that an offering below NAV per share would have on our
stockholders, including the potential dilution they would experience as a
result of the offering;
|
|
|
·
|
The
amount per share by which the offering price per share and the net
proceeds per share are less than the most recently determined NAV per
share;
|
|
|
·
|
The
relationship of recent market prices of par common stock to NAV per share
and the potential impact of the offering on the market price per share of
our common stock;
|
|
|
·
|
Whether
the estimated offering price would closely approximate the market value of
our shares;
|
|
|
·
|
The
potential market impact of being able to raise capital during the current
financial market difficulties;
|
|
|
·
|
The
nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
·
|
The
anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and availability of
investments; and
|
|
|
·
|
The
leverage available to us.
|
Our
Board of Directors would also consider the fact that sales of common stock at a
discount will benefit our Advisor as the Advisor will earn additional investment
management fees on the proceeds of such offerings, as it would from the offering
of any other securities of the Company or from the offering of common stock at
premium to NAV per share.
We
will not sell shares under a prospectus supplement to the registration statement
or current post-effective amendment thereto of which this prospectus forms a
part (the "current registration statement") if the cumulative dilution to our
NAV per share from offerings under the current registration statement exceeds
15%. This limit would be measured separately for each offering pursuant to the
current amendment by calculating the percentage dilution or accretion to
aggregate NAV from that offering and then summing the percentage from each
offering. For example, if our most recently determined NAV at the time of the
first offering is $10.06 and we have 64 million shares outstanding, sale of 16
million shares at net proceeds to us of $5.03 per share (a 50% discount) would
produce dilution of 10.00%. If we subsequently determined that our NAV per share
increased to $11.00 on the then 80 million shares outstanding and then made an
additional offering, we could, for example, sell approximately an
additional
8.885 million shares at net proceeds to us of $5.50 per share, which would
produce dilution of 5.00%, before we would reach the aggregate 15% limit. If we
file a new post-effective amendment, the threshold would reset.
Sales
by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose potential risks for our
existing stockholders whether or not they participate in the offering, as well
as for new investors who participate in the offering.
The
following three headings and accompanying tables will explain and provide
hypothetical examples on the impact of an offering at a price less than NAV per
share on three different set of investors:
|
|
·
|
existing
shareholders who do not purchase any shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
·
|
existing
shareholders who purchase a relatively small amount of shares in the
offering or a relatively large amount of shares in the offering;
and
|
|
|
·
|
new
investors who become shareholders by purchasing shares in the
offering.
|
Impact
On Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the Offering
Our
existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering below NAV per share
or who do not buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower
price we obtain in the offering (after expenses and commissions) face the
greatest potential risks. These stockholders will experience an immediate
decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV of the shares they hold and their
NAV per share. These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately
greater decrease in their participation in our earnings and assets and their
voting power than the increase we will experience in our assets, potential
earning power and voting interests due to the offering. These shareholders may
also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often
reflects to some degree announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV
per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases.
The
following chart illustrates the level of NAV dilution that would be experienced
by a nonparticipating stockholder in three different hypothetical offerings of
different sizes and levels of discount from NAV per share. It is not possible to
predict the level of market price decline that may occur.
The
examples assume that the issuer has 64,000,000 common shares outstanding,
$700,000,000 in total assets and $56,160,000 in total liabilities. The current
NAV and NAV per share are thus $643,840,000 and $10.06. The chart illustrates
the dilutive effect on Stockholder A of (1) an offering of 3,200,000 shares (5%
of the outstanding shares) at $9.56 per share after offering expenses and
commission (a 5% discount from NAV), (2) an offering of 6,400,000 shares (10% of
the outstanding shares) at $9.05 per share after offering expenses and
commissions (a 10% discount from NAV) and (3) an offering of 12,800,000 shares
(20% of the outstanding shares) at $8.05 per share after offering expenses and
commissions (a 20% discount from NAV). The prospectus supplement pursuant to
which any discounted offering is made will include a chart based on the actual
number of shares in such offering and the actual discount to the most recently
determined NAV, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example
1
|
|
|
Example
2
|
|
|
Example
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5%
Offering
|
|
|
10%
Offering
|
|
|
20%
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Prior
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Decrease
to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
67,200,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
70,400,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
NAV
per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
Dilution
to Nonparticipating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
by Stockholder A
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
Percentage
Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
(4.76
|
)%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(9.09
|
)%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
(16.67
|
)%
|
|
Total
NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
642,307
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
637,987
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
622,379
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
Total
Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per
Share)
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per Share
on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution
per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided by Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Impact
On Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in the Offering
Our
existing stockholders who participate in an offering below NAV per share or who
buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price as we
obtain in the offering (after expenses and commissions) will experience the same
types of NAV dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at a lower
level, to the extent they purchase less than the same percentage of the
discounted offering as their interest in our shares immediately prior to the
offering. The level of NAV dilution will decrease as the number of shares such
stockholders purchase increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than such
percentage will experience NAV dilution but will, in contrast to existing
stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate share of the offering,
experience an increase (often called accretion) in NAV per share over their
investment per share and will also experience a disproportionately greater
increase in their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting
power than our increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests
due to the offering. The level of accretion will increase as the excess number
of shares such stockholder purchases increases. Even a stockholder who
overparticipates will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make
additional discounted offerings in which such stockholder does not participate,
in which case such a stockholder will experience NAV dilution as described above
in such subsequent offerings. These shareholders may also experience a decline
in the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree
announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This decrease
could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts
increases.
The
following chart illustrates the level of dilution and accretion in the
hypothetical 20% discount offering from the prior chart (Example 3) for a
stockholder that acquires shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share of
the offering (i.e., 6,400 shares, which is 0.05% of an offering of 12,800,000
shares) rather than its 0.10% proportionate share and (2) 150% of such
percentage (i.e. 19,200 shares, which is 0.15% of an offering of 12,800,000
shares rather than its 0.10% proportionate share). The prospectus supplement
pursuant to which any discounted offering is made will include a chart for these
examples based on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual
discount from the most recently determined NAV per share, as applicable. It is
not possible to predict the level of market price decline that may
occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
|
Prior
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase
to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
NAV
per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
to Participating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
by Stockholder A
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
70,400
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
83,200
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
%
|
|
Percentage
Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(8.33
|
)%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
|
Total
NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
684,617
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
809,092
|
|
|
|
25.67
|
%
|
|
Total
Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per Share on Shares held
Prior to Sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
698,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
806,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be $10.06 on Shares Held
Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
(1.44
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
(3.64
|
)%
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided
by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.93
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Impact
On New Investors
Investors
who are not currently stockholders and who participate in an offering below NAV
but whose investment per share is greater than the resulting NAV per share due
to selling compensation and expenses paid by the issuer will experience an
immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and their NAV per
share compared to the price they pay for their shares. Investors who are not
currently stockholders and who participate in an offering below NAV per share
and whose investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per share due
to selling compensation and expenses paid by the issuer being significantly less
than the discount per share will experience an immediate increase in the NAV of
their shares and their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. These investors will experience a disproportionately greater
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than our
increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests. These
investors will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make additional
discounted offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in
which case such new stockholder will experience dilution as described above in
such subsequent offerings. These investors may also experience a decline in the
market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or
potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more
pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts
increases.
The
following chart illustrates the level of dilution or accretion for new investors
that would be experienced by a new investor in the same hypothetical 5%, 10% and
20% discounted offerings as described in the first chart above. The illustration
is for a new investor who purchases the same percentage (0.10%) of the shares in
the offering as Stockholder A in the prior examples held immediately prior to
the offering. The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted
offering is made will include a chart for these examples based on the actual
number of shares in such offering and the actual discount from the most recently
determined NAV per share, as applicable. It is not possible to predict the level
of market price decline that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example
1
|
|
|
Example
2
|
|
|
Example
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5%
Offering
|
|
|
10%
Offering
|
|
|
20%
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Prior
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase
to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
67,200,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
70,400,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
NAV
per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
by Investor A
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Held by Investor A
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
NAV Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
per Share Held by Investor A (NAV per Share Less Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.79
|
%
|
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT PLAN
We
have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of our
distributions on behalf of our stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to
receive cash as provided below. As a result, when our Board of Directors
authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not
"opted out" of our dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash dividends
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, rather than
receiving the cash dividends.
No
action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to have their cash
dividend reinvested in shares of our common stock. A registered stockholder may
elect to receive an entire dividend in cash by notifying the plan administrator
and our transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is received
by the plan administrator no later than the record date for dividends to
stockholders. The plan administrator sets up an account for shares acquired
through the plan for each stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends
in cash and hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a
stockholder participating in the plan, the plan administrator will, instead of
crediting shares to the participant's account, issue a certificate registered in
the participant's name for the number of whole shares of our common stock and a
check for any fractional share. Such request by a stockholder must be received
three days prior to the dividend payable date in order for that dividend to be
paid in cash. If such request is received less than three days prior to the
dividend payable date, then the dividends are reinvested and shares are
repurchased for the stockholder's account; however, future dividends are paid
out in cash on all balances. Those stockholders whose shares are held by a
broker or other financial intermediary may receive dividends in cash by
notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their
election.
We
primarily use newly issued shares to implement the plan, whether our shares are
trading at a premium or at a discount to net asset value. However, we reserve
the right to purchase shares in the open market in connection with our
implementation of the plan. The number of shares to be issued to a stockholder
is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to
such stockholder by the market price per share of our common stock at the close
of regular trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on the valuation date for
such dividend. If we use newly-issued shares to implement the plan, the
valuation date will not be earlier than the last day that stockholders have the
right to elect to receive cash in lieu of shares. Market price per share on that
date will be the closing price for such shares on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market or, if no sale is reported for such day, at the average of their reported
bid and asked prices. The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding
after giving effect to payment of the dividend cannot be established until the
value per share at which additional shares will be issued has been determined
and elections of our stockholders have been tabulated. Stockholders who do not
elect to receive dividends in shares of common stock may experience accretion to
the net asset value of their shares if our shares are trading at a premium at
the time we issue new shares under the plan and dilution if our shares are
trading at a discount. The level of accretion or discount would depend on
various factors, including the proportion of our stockholders who participate in
the plan, the level of premium or discount at which our shares are trading and
the amount of the dividend payable to a stockholder.
There
are no brokerage charges or other charges to stockholders who participate in the
plan. The plan administrator's fees under the plan are paid by us. If a
participant elects by written notice to the plan administrator to have the plan
administrator sell part or all of the shares held by the plan administrator in
the participant's account and remit the proceeds to the participant, the plan
administrator is authorized to deduct a $15 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per
share brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
Stockholders
who receive dividends in the form of stock are subject to the same U.S. Federal,
state and local tax consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their
dividends in cash. A stockholder's basis for determining gain or loss upon the
sale of stock received in a dividend from us will be equal to the total dollar
amount of the dividend payable to the stockholder. Any stock received in a
dividend will have a new holding period for tax purposes commencing on the day
following the day on which the shares are credited to the U.S. stockholder's
account.
Participants
may terminate their accounts under the plan by notifying the plan administrator
via its website at www.amstock.com or by filling out the transaction request
form located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to the plan
administrator at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, P.O. Box 922, Wall
Street Station, New York, NY 10269-0560 or by calling the plan administrator's
Interactive Voice Response System at (888) 888-0313.
The
plan may be terminated by us upon notice in writing mailed to each participant
at least 30 days prior to any payable date for the payment of any dividend by
us. All correspondence concerning the plan should be directed to the plan
administrator by mail at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden
Lane, New York, NY 10007 or by telephone at (718) 921-8200.
Stockholders
who purchased their shares through or hold their shares in the name of a broker
or financial institution should consult with a representative of their broker or
financial institution with respect to their participation in our dividend
reinvestment plan. Such holders of our stock may not be identified as our
registered stockholders with the plan administrator and may not automatically
have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of our common stock by the
administrator.
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The
following discussion is a general summary of the material U.S. Federal income
tax considerations applicable to us and to an investment in our shares. This
summary does not purport to be a complete description of the income tax
considerations applicable to us or our investors on such an investment. For
example, we have not described tax consequences that we assume to be generally
known by investors or certain considerations that may be relevant to certain
types of holders subject to special treatment under U.S. Federal income tax
laws, including stockholders subject to the alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt
organizations, insurance companies, dealers in securities, pension plans and
trusts, financial institutions, U.S. stockholders (as defined below) whose
functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons who mark-to-market our
shares and persons who hold our shares as part of a "straddle," "hedge" or
"conversion" transaction. This summary assumes that investors hold our common
stock as capital assets (within the meaning of the Code). The discussion is
based upon the Code, Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial
interpretations, each as of the date of this prospectus and all of which are
subject to change, possibly retroactively, which could affect the continuing
validity of this discussion. We have not sought and will not seek any ruling
from the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, regarding this offering. This
summary does not discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign,
state or local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment under U.S. Federal
income tax laws that could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or
certain other investment assets.
A
"U.S. stockholder" is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is
for U.S. Federal income tax purposes:
|
|
·
|
a
citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
·
|
a
corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or any state thereof or the District of
Columbia;
|
|
|
·
|
an
estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. Federal income taxation
regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
·
|
a
trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the
administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the
authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) it has
a valid election in place to be treated as a U.S.
person.
|
A
"Non-U.S. stockholder" is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that
is not a partnership and is not a U.S. stockholder.
If
a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes) holds shares of our common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner
and the activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is a
partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock should consult its
tax advisors with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares
of our common stock.
Tax
matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an investor of an
investment in our shares will depend on the facts of his, her or its particular
situation. We encourage investors to consult their own tax advisors regarding
the specific consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting
requirements, the applicability of U.S. Federal, state, local and foreign tax
laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable tax treaty and the effect
of any possible changes in the tax laws.
Election
To Be Taxed As A RIC
As
a business development company, we have qualified and elected to be treated as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we generally are not subject to
corporate-level U.S. Federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital
gains that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC,
we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset
diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, to obtain RIC
tax treatment, we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at
least 90% of our "investment company taxable income," which is generally our
ordinary income plus the excess of realized net short-term capital gains over
realized net long-term capital losses, or the Annual Distribution
Requirement.
Taxation
As A RIC
Provided
that we qualify as a
RIC and satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, we will not be subject to
U.S. Federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income
and net capital gain (which we define as net long-term capital gains in excess
of net short-term capital losses) we timely distribute to stockholders. We will
be subject to U.S. Federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any
income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our
stockholders.
We
will be subject to a 4% non-deductible U.S. Federal excise tax on certain
undistributed income of RICs unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount
at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar
year, (2) 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending
October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not
distributed, in preceding years.
In
December 2008, our Board of Directors elected to retain excess profits generated
in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and pay a 4% excise tax on such retained
earnings. We paid $533,000 for the excise tax with the filing of our tax return
in March 2009.
In
order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, we must, among
other things:
|
|
·
|
qualify
to be treated as a business development company or be registered as a
management investment company under the 1940 Act at all times during each
taxable year;
|
|
|
·
|
derive
in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends,
interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from
the sale or other disposition of stock or other securities or currencies
or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such
stock, securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest in
a "qualified publicly traded partnership" (as defined in the Code) or the
90% Income Test; and
|
|
|
·
|
diversify
our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable
year:
|
|
|
·
|
at
least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities
if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5%
of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting
securities of the issuer (which for these purposes includes the equity
securities of a "qualified publicly traded partnership");
and
|
|
|
·
|
no
more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities,
other than U.S. Government securities or securities of other RICs, (i) of
one issuer (ii) of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined
under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or
similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) of one or more "qualified
publicly traded partnerships," or the diversification
tests.
|
To
the extent that we invest in entities treated as partnerships for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes (other than a "qualified publicly traded partnership"), we
generally must include the items of gross income derived by the partnerships for
purposes of the 90% Income Test, and the income that is derived from a
partnership (other than a "qualified publicly traded partnership") will be
treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test only to the
extent that such income is attributable to items of income of the partnership
which would be qualifying income if realized by us directly. In addition, we
generally must take into account our proportionate share of the assets held by
partnerships (other than a "qualified publicly traded partnership") in which we
are a partner for purposes of the diversification tests.
In
order to meet the 90% Income Test, we may establish one or more special purpose
corporations to hold assets from which we do not anticipate earning dividend,
interest or other qualifying income under the 90% Income Test. Any such special
purpose corporation would generally be subject to U.S. Federal income tax, and
could result in a reduced after-tax yield on the portion of our assets held
there.
We
may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not
receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under
applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments
with payment-in-kind interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or
issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the
original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless
of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable
year. Because any original issue discount accrued will be included in our
investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to
make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual
Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any
corresponding cash amount.
Gain
or loss realized by us from warrants acquired by us as well as any loss
attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally will be treated as capital
gain or loss. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term or short-term,
depending on how long we held a particular warrant.
Although
we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized to borrow funds and to
sell assets in order to satisfy distribution requirements. However, under the
1940 Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while
our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain
"asset coverage" tests are met. See "Regulation — Senior Securities." Moreover,
our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be
limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (2) other
requirements relating to our status as a RIC, including the diversification
tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution
Requirement or to avoid the excise tax, we may make such dispositions at times
that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If
we fail to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement or otherwise fail to
qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we will be subject to tax in that year on
all of our taxable income, regardless of whether we make any distributions to
our stockholders. In that case, all of such income will be subject to
corporate-level U.S. Federal
income
tax, reducing the amount available to be distributed to our stockholders. See
"Failure To Obtain RIC Tax Treatment."
As
a regulated investment company, we are not allowed to carry forward or carry
back a net operating loss for purposes of computing our investment company
taxable income in other taxable years. Certain of our investment practices may
be subject to special and complex U.S. Federal income tax provisions that may,
among other things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of
certain losses or deductions, (ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain
and qualified dividend income into higher taxed short-term capital gain or
ordinary income, (iii) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction into a capital
loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (iv) cause us to recognize
income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (v) adversely affect the
time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed to occur,
(vi) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial
transactions, and (vii) produce income that will not be qualifying income for
purposes of the 90% Income Test. We will monitor our transactions and may make
certain tax elections in order to mitigate the effect of these
provisions.
As
described above, to the extent that we invest in equity securities of entities
that are treated as partnerships for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the
effect of such investments for purposes of the 90% Income Test and the
diversification tests will depend on whether or not the partnership is a
"qualified publicly traded partnership" (as defined in the Code). If the
partnership is a "qualified publicly traded partnership," the net income derived
from such investments will be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income
Test and will be "securities" for purposes of the diversification tests. If the
partnership, however, is not treated as a "qualified publicly traded
partnership," then the consequences of an investment in the partnership will
depend upon the amount and type of income and assets of the partnership
allocable to us. The income derived from such investments may not be qualifying
income for purposes of the 90% Income Test and, therefore, could adversely
affect our qualification as a RIC. We intend to monitor our investments in
equity securities of entities that are treated as partnerships for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes to prevent our disqualification as a RIC.
We
may invest in preferred securities or other securities the U.S. Federal income
tax treatment of which may not be clear or may be subject to recharacterization
by the IRS. To the extent the tax treatment of such securities or the income
from such securities differs from the expected tax treatment, it could affect
the timing or character of income recognized, requiring us to purchase or sell
securities, or otherwise change our portfolio, in order to comply with the tax
rules applicable to RICs under the Code.
Taxation
Of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions
by us generally are taxable to U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital
gains. Distributions of our "investment company taxable income" (which is,
generally, our ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in
excess of realized net long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary
income to U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings
and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. For
taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2010, to the extent such
distributions paid by us to noncorporate stockholders (including individuals)
are attributable to dividends from U.S. corporations and certain qualified
foreign corporations, such distributions generally will be eligible for taxation
at rates applicable to long term capital gains (currently a maximum tax rate of
15%)
provided
that we
properly designate such distribution as derived from "qualified dividend income"
and certain holding period and other requirements are satisfied. In this regard,
it is not anticipated that a significant portion of distributions paid by us
will be attributable to qualified dividends and, therefore, generally will not
qualify for the long term capital gains. Distributions of our net capital gains
(which is generally our realized net long-term capital gains in excess of
realized net short-term capital losses) properly designated by us as "capital
gain dividends" will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as long-term capital gains
(currently at a maximum rate of 15% in the case of individuals, trusts or
estates), regardless of the U.S. stockholder's holding period for his, her or
its common stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or reinvested in
additional common stock. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated
earnings and profits first will reduce a U.S. stockholder's adjusted tax basis
in such stockholder's common stock and, after the adjusted basis is reduced to
zero, will constitute capital gains to such U.S. stockholder.
Although
we currently intend to distribute any long-term capital gains at least annually,
we may in the future decide to retain some or all of our long-term capital
gains, but designate the retained amount as a "deemed distribution." In that
case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained amount, each
U.S. stockholder will be required to include his, her or its proportionate share
of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to
the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a
credit equal to his, her or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon by us.
The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the U.S.
stockholder's tax basis for his, her or its common stock. Since we expect to pay
tax on any retained capital gains at our regular corporate tax rate, and since
that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on
long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual stockholders will be
treated as having paid and for which they will receive a credit will exceed the
tax they owe on the retained net capital gain. Such excess generally may be
claimed as a credit against the U.S. stockholder's other U.S. Federal income tax
obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds a stockholder's
liability for U.S. Federal income tax. A stockholder that is not subject to U.S.
Federal income tax or otherwise required to file a U.S. Federal income tax
return would be required to file a U.S. Federal income tax return on the
appropriate form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. In order to
utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide written notice to our
stockholders prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the relevant
taxable year. We cannot treat any of our investment company taxable income as a
"deemed distribution."
For
purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual Distribution Requirement is
satisfied for any year and (2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for
that year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a dividend that
is paid during the following taxable year as if it had been paid during the
taxable year in question. If we make such an election, the U.S. stockholder will
still be treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which the
distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us in October, November
or December of any calendar year, payable to stockholders of record on a
specified date in any such month and actually paid during January of the
following year, will be treated as if it had been received by our U.S.
stockholders on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was
declared.
If
an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly before the record date
of a distribution, the price of the shares will include the value of the
distribution and the investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even
though it represents a return of his, her or its investment.
A
U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss if the
stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her or its shares of our common
stock. Any gain arising from such sale or disposition generally will be treated
as long-term capital gain or loss if the stockholder has held his, her or its
shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it would be classified as short-term
capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss arising from the sale or
disposition of shares of our common stock held for six months or less will be
treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain
dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed received, with respect
to such shares. In addition, all or a portion of any loss recognized upon a
disposition of shares of our common stock may be disallowed if other
substantially identical shares are purchased (whether through reinvestment of
distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after the disposition. The
ability to otherwise deduct capital losses may be subject to other limitations
under the code.
In
general, individual U.S. stockholders currently are subject to a maximum U.S.
Federal income tax rate of 15% on their net capital gain, or the excess of
realized net long-term capital gain over realized net short-term capital loss
for a taxable year, including a long-term capital gain derived from an
investment in our shares. Such rate is lower than the maximum rate on ordinary
income currently payable by individuals. Corporate U.S. stockholders currently
are subject to U.S. Federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35%
rate also applied to ordinary income. Noncorporate stockholders with net capital
losses for a year (which we define as capital losses in excess of capital gains)
generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their ordinary income
each year; any net capital losses of a noncorporate stockholder in excess of
$3,000 generally may be carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided
in the Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any net capital
losses for a year, but may carry back such losses for three years or carry
forward such losses for five years.
We
will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly as possible after the
end of each calendar year, a notice detailing, on a per share and per
distribution basis, the amounts includible in such U.S. stockholder's taxable
income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital gain. In
addition, the U.S. Federal tax status of each year's distributions generally
will be reported to the IRS (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible
for the 15% maximum rate). Distributions may also be subject to additional
state, local and foreign taxes depending on a U.S. stockholder's particular
situation. Dividends distributed by us generally will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction or the preferential rate applicable to qualifying
dividends.
We
may be required to withhold U.S. Federal income tax, or backup withholding,
currently at a rate of 28% (until January 1, 2011 when a higher rate
of 31% will apply absent Congressional action) from all taxable distributions to
any noncorporate U.S. stockholder (1) who fails to furnish us with a correct
taxpayer identification number or a certificate that such stockholder is exempt
from backup withholding, or (2) with respect to whom the IRS notifies us that
such stockholder has failed to properly report certain interest and dividend
income to the IRS and to respond to notices to that effect. An individual's
taxpayer identification number is his or her social security number. Backup
withholding is not an additional tax, and any amount withheld may be refunded or
credited against the U.S. stockholder's U.S. Federal income tax liability,
provided
that proper
information is timely provided to the IRS.
Taxation
Of Non-U.S. Stockholders
Whether
an investment in the shares is appropriate for a Non-U.S. stockholder will
depend upon that person's particular circumstances. An investment in the shares
by a Non-U.S. stockholder may have adverse tax consequences. Non-U.S.
stockholders should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common
stock.
Distributions
of our "investment company taxable income" to Non-U.S. stockholders that are not
"effectively connected" with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the Non-U.S.
stockholder, will generally be subject to withholding of U.S. Federal income tax
at a rate of 30% (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) to the extent
of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. However, effective for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010, we generally will not be
required to withhold any amounts with respect to distributions of (i)
U.S.-source interest income that would not have been subject to withholding of
U.S. Federal income tax if they had been earned directly by a Non-U.S.
stockholder, and (ii) net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term
capital losses that would not have been subject to withholding of U.S. Federal
income tax if they had been earned directly by a Non-U.S. stockholder, in each
case only to the extent that such distributions are properly designated by us as
"interest-related dividends" or "short-term capital gain dividends," as the case
may be, and certain other requirements are met.
Actual
or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a Non-U.S. stockholder, and
gains realized by a Non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale of our common stock, that
are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder, will generally not be subject to U.S. Federal withholding
tax and generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal income tax unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual and is physically present
in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year and meets
certain other requirements. However, withholding of U.S. Federal income tax at a
rate of 30% on capital gains of nonresident alien individuals who are physically
present in the United States for more than the 182 day period only applies in
exceptional cases because any individual present in the United States for more
than 182 days during the taxable year is generally treated as a resident for
U.S. income tax purposes; in that case, he or she would be subject to U.S.
income tax on his or her worldwide income at the graduated rates applicable to
U.S. citizens, rather than the 30% U.S. Federal withholding tax.
If
we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual
distributions (which we may do in the future), a Non-U.S. stockholder will be
entitled to a U.S. Federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the
stockholder's allocable share of the tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to
have been distributed. In order to obtain the refund, the Non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S.
Federal
income tax return even if the Non-U.S. stockholder would not otherwise be
required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. Federal
income tax return. Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be appropriate
for a Non-U.S. stockholder.
Distributions
of our "investment company taxable income" and net capital gains (including
deemed distributions) to Non-U.S. stockholders, and gains realized by Non-U.S.
stockholders upon the sale of our common stock that is "effectively connected"
with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the Non-U.S. stockholder (or if an
income tax treaty applies, attributable to a "permanent establishment" in the
United States), will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax at the graduated
rates applicable to U.S. citizens, residents and domestic corporations.
Corporate Non-U.S. stockholders may also be subject to an additional branch
profits tax at a rate of 30% imposed by the Code (or lower rate provided by an
applicable treaty). In the case of a non-corporate Non-U.S. stockholder, we may
be required to withhold U.S. Federal income tax from distributions that are
otherwise exempt from withholding tax (or taxable at a reduced rate) unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder certifies his or her foreign status under penalties of
perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The
tax consequences to a Non-U.S. stockholder entitled to claim the benefits of an
applicable tax treaty may differ from those described herein. Non-U.S.
stockholders are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the
particular tax consequences to them of an investment in our shares.
A
Non-U.S. stockholder who is a nonresident alien individual may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding of U.S. Federal income tax on
dividends unless the Non-U.S. stockholder provides us or the dividend paying
agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise
meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a Non-U.S.
stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup
withholding.
Non-U.S.
persons should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the U.S. Federal
income tax and withholding tax, and state, local and foreign tax consequences of
an investment in the shares.
Failure
To Obtain RIC Tax Treatment
If
we were unable to obtain tax treatment as a RIC, we would be subject to tax on
all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to
deduct distributions to stockholders, nor would they be required to be made.
Distributions would generally be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary
dividend income (currently eligible for the 15% maximum rate) to the extent of
our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations
under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction.
Distributions
in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated
first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder's tax basis, and
any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
The
discussion set forth herein does not constitute tax advice, and potential
investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the tax
considerations relevant to their particular situation.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The
following description is based on relevant portions of the Maryland General
Corporation Law and on our charter and bylaws. This summary is not necessarily
complete, and we refer you to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our
charter and bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions summarized
below.
Capital
Stock
Our
authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of stock, par value
$0.001 per share, all of which is initially classified as common stock. Our
common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
"PSEC." There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase our stock. No
stock has been authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans.
Under Maryland law, our stockholders generally are not personally liable for our
debts or obligations.
Under
our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to classify and reclassify any
unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, and to authorize
the issuance of such shares, without obtaining stockholder approval. As
permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter provides that the
Board of Directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend the
charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares
of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have
authority to issue.
The
below table sets forth each class of our outstanding securities as of February
25, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
Amount
Held
by
the Company
or
for its Account
|
|
(4)
Amount
Outstanding
Exclusive
of Amount
Shown
Under(3)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
100,000,000
|
|
0
|
|
63,586,731
|
Common
Stock
All
shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings, assets, dividends
and voting and, when they are issued, will be duly authorized, validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of our
common stock if, as and when authorized by our Board of Directors and declared
by us out of funds legally available therefor. Shares of our common stock have
no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and are freely transferable,
except where their transfer is restricted by U.S. Federal and state securities
laws or by contract. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
us, each share of our common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of
our assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay all debts
and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of our
preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each share
of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote
of stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with
respect to any other class or series of stock, the holders of our common stock
will possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the
election of directors, which means that prior to the issuance of preferred stock
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock will elect all
of our directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares will be
unable to elect any director.
Preferred
Stock
Our
charter authorizes our Board of Directors to classify and reclassify any
unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, including
preferred stock. Prior to issuance of shares of each class or series, the Board
of Directors is required by Maryland law and by our charter to set the terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or
conditions of redemption for each class or series. Thus, the Board of Directors
could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with terms and
conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for
holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. You should
note, however, that any issuance of preferred stock must comply with the
requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that
(1) immediately after issuance and before any dividend or other distribution
(other than in shares of stock) is made with respect to our common stock and
before any purchase of common stock is made, such preferred stock together with
all other senior securities
must
not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total assets after deducting the amount
of such dividend, distribution or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2)
the holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as
a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the
directors if dividends on such preferred stock become in arrears by two years or
more until all arrears are cured. Certain matters under the 1940 Act require the
separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock. For
example, holders of preferred stock would vote separately from the holders of
common stock on a proposal to operate other than as an investment company. We
believe that the availability for issuance of preferred stock will provide us
with increased flexibility in structuring future financings and
acquisitions.
Limitation
On Liability Of Directors And Officers; Indemnification And Advance Of
Expenses
Maryland
law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision
limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its
stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b)
active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being
material to the cause of action. Our charter contains such a provision which
eliminates directors' and officers' liability to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our
charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and
subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to obligate ourselves to indemnify
any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while serving
as a director or officer and at our request, serves or has served another
corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or
trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become
subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in any
such capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of
final disposition of a proceeding. Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent
permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while
serving as a director or officer and at our request, serves or has served
another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture,
trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner
or trustee and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding
by reason of his or her service in any such capacity from and against any claim
or liability to which that person may become subject or which that person may
incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or
reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a
proceeding. The charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance
expenses to any person who served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities
described above and any of our employees or agents or any employees or agents of
our predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, we will not indemnify any
person for any liability to which such person would be subject by reason of such
person's willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Maryland
law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which our
charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on
the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is
made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in that
capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former
directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines,
settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with
any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party by
reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established
that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the
matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2)
was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer
actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or
(c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However,
under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse
judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of
liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received, unless
in either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In
addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a
director or officer upon the corporation's receipt of (a) a written affirmation
by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has
met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and
(b) a written undertaking by
him
or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the
corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not
met.
Our
insurance policy does not currently provide coverage for claims, liabilities and
expenses that may arise out of activities that a present or former director or
officer of us has performed for another entity at our request. There is no
assurance that such entities will in fact carry such insurance. However, we note
that we do not expect to request our present or former directors or officers to
serve another entity as a director, officer, partner or trustee unless we can
obtain insurance providing coverage for such persons for any claims, liabilities
or expenses that may arise out of their activities while serving in such
capacities.
Provisions
Of The Maryland General Corporation Law And Our Charter And Bylaws
Anti-takeover
Effect
The
Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws contain provisions
that could make it more difficult for a potential acquiror to acquire us by
means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are
expected to discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to
negotiate first with our Board of Directors. These provisions could have the
effect of depriving stockholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a
premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from seeking
to obtain control of us. We believe that the benefits of these provisions
outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging any such acquisition
proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of such proposals may
improve their terms.
Control
Share Acquisitions
The
Maryland General Corporation Law under the Control Share Act provides that
control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition
have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror, by
officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation are excluded from
shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock
which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in
respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of
voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the
acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the
following ranges of voting power:
|
|
·
|
one-tenth
or more but less than one-third,
|
|
|
·
|
one-third
or more but less than a majority, or
|
|
|
·
|
a
majority or more of all voting
power.
|
The
requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an acquiror crosses
one of the thresholds of voting power set forth above. Control shares do not
include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of
having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition
means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain
exceptions.
A
person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition may compel
the Board of Directors of the corporation to call a special meeting of
stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights
of the shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is subject
to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an undertaking to pay the
expenses of the meeting. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation
may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If
voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does
not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then the
corporation may repurchase for fair value any or all of the control shares,
except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right of
the corporation to repurchase control shares is subject to certain conditions
and limitations, including, as provided in our bylaws, compliance with the 1940
Act. Fair value is determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights
for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by
the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the
shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are
approved at a stockholders meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a
majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise
appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of
appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the
acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The
Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger,
consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction
or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the
corporation.
Our
bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Act any and all
acquisitions by any person of our shares of stock. There can be no assurance
that such provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.
However, we will notify the Division of Investment Management at the SEC prior
to amending our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Act and will make such
amendment only if the Board of Directors determines that it would be in our best
interests.
Business
Combinations
Under
Maryland law, "business combinations" between a Maryland corporation and an
interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are
prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations
include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified
in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity
securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
|
|
·
|
any
person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the
corporation's shares; or
|
|
|
·
|
an
affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the
two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of
10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of
the corporation.
|
A
person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if the Board of
Directors approved in advance the transaction by which he otherwise would have
become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the Board
of Directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the Board of
Directors.
After
the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland
corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the
Board of Directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at
least:
|
|
·
|
80%
of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of
voting stock of the corporation; and
|
|
|
·
|
two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the
corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom
or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held
by an affiliate or associate of the interested
stockholder.
|
These
super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation's common
stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their
shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously
paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The
statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business
combinations that are exempted by the Board of Directors before the time that
the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our Board of
Directors has adopted a resolution that any business combination between us and
any other person is exempted from the provisions of the Business Combination
Act,
provided
that the
business combination is first approved by the Board of Directors, including a
majority of the directors who are not interested persons as defined in the 1940
Act. This resolution, however, may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at
any time. If this resolution is repealed, or the Board of Directors does not
otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may discourage others from
trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any
offer.
Conflict
with 1940 Act
Our
bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision of the Maryland
General Corporation Law, including the Control Share Act (if we amend our bylaws
to be subject to such Act) and the Business Combination Act, or any provision of
our charter or bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the
applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
Classified
Board of Directors
Our
Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered
three-year terms. The current terms of the first, second and third classes will
expire in 2011, 2012 and 2010 respectively, and in each case, until their
successors are duly elected and qualify. Each year one class of directors will
be elected to the Board of Directors by the stockholders. A classified board may
render a change in control of us or removal of our incumbent management more
difficult. We believe, however, that the longer time required to elect a
majority of a classified Board of Directors will help to ensure the continuity
and stability of our management and policies.
Election
of Directors
Our
charter and bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote in the election of
directors will be required to elect a director. Under the charter, our Board of
Directors may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect
directors.
Number
of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
Our
charter provides that the number of directors will be set only by the Board of
Directors in accordance with our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that a majority of
our entire Board of Directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of
directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of directors may
never be less than three nor more than eight. Our charter provides that, at such
time as we have three independent directors and our common stock is registered
under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, we elect to be
subject to the provision of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the Maryland General
Corporation Law regarding the filling of vacancies on the Board of Directors.
Accordingly, at such time, except as may be provided by the Board of Directors
in setting the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, any and all
vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote
of a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the remaining
directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy
will serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the
vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies, subject to any
applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our
charter provides that a director may be removed only for cause, as defined in
our charter, and then only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the
votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.
Action
by Stockholders
The
Maryland General Corporation Law provides that stockholder action can be taken
only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders or (unless the charter
provides for stockholder action by less than unanimous written consent, which
our charter does not) by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting. These
provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws regarding the calling
of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholders discussed below, may
have the effect of delaying consideration of a stockholder proposal until the
next annual meeting.
Advance
Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder
Proposals
Our
bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders,
nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors and the proposal
of business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to
our notice of the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) by a stockholder
who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance
notice procedures of the bylaws. With respect to special meetings of
stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be
brought before the meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of
Directors at a special meeting may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of
the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3)
provided
that the Board of
Directors has determined that directors will be elected at the meeting, by a
stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the
advance notice provisions of the bylaws.
The
purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice of nominations and
other business is to afford our Board of Directors a meaningful opportunity to
consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of any
other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by our
Board of Directors, to inform stockholders and make recommendations about such
qualifications or business, as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for
conducting meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our Board
of Directors any power to disapprove stockholder nominations for the election of
directors or proposals recommending certain action, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or the consideration of
stockholder proposals if proper procedures are not followed and of discouraging
or deterring a third party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect
its own slate of directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to
whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be harmful or
beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling
of Special Meetings of Stockholders
Our
bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called by our Board
of Directors and certain of our officers. Additionally, our bylaws provide that,
subject to the satisfaction of certain procedural and informational requirements
by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a special meeting of stockholders
will be called by the secretary of the corporation upon the written request of
stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled
to be cast at such meeting.
Approval
of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Charter and Bylaws
Under
Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its
charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share
exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of
business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to
cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these
matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter generally provides for approval
of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions by the stockholders
entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter.
Our
charter also provides that certain charter amendments and any proposal for our
conversion, whether by merger or otherwise, from a closed-end company to an
open-end company or any proposal for our liquidation or dissolution requires the
approval of the stockholders entitled to cast at least 80 percent of the votes
entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such amendment or proposal is
approved by at least two-thirds of our continuing directors (in addition to
approval by our Board of Directors), such amendment or proposal may be approved
by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The "continuing
directors" are defined in our charter as our current directors as well as those
directors whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by
the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of the continuing
directors then on the Board of Directors.
Our
charter and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will have the exclusive
power to make, alter, amend or repeal any provision of our bylaws.
No
Appraisal Rights
Except
with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection with the Control Share
Act discussed above, as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our
charter provides that stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal
rights.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR PREFERRED STOCK
In
addition to shares of common stock, our charter authorizes the issuance of
preferred stock. If we offer preferred stock under this prospectus, we will
issue an appropriate prospectus supplement. We may issue preferred stock from
time to time in one or more series, without stockholder approval. Our Board of
Directors is authorized to fix for any series of preferred stock the number of
shares of such series and the designation, relative powers, preferences and
rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such series;
except that, such an issuance must adhere to the requirements of the 1940 Act,
Maryland law and any other limitations imposed by law.
The
1940 Act requires, among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and
before any distribution is made with respect to common stock, the liquidation
preference of the preferred stock, together with all other senior securities,
must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total assets (taking into account
such distribution) and (2) the holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are
issued, must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to
elect a majority of the directors if dividends on the preferred stock are in
arrears by two years or more.
For
any series of preferred stock that we may issue, our Board of Directors will
determine and the prospectus supplement relating to such series will
describe:
|
|
·
|
the
designation and number of shares of such series;
|
|
|
·
|
the
rate and time at which, and the preferences and conditions under which,
any dividends will be paid on shares of such series, the cumulative nature
of such dividends and whether such dividends have any participating
feature;
|
|
|
·
|
any
provisions relating to convertibility or exchangeability of the shares of
such series;
|
|
|
·
|
the
rights and preferences, if any, of holders of shares of such series upon
our liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our
affairs;
|
|
|
·
|
the
voting powers of the holders of shares of such series;
|
|
|
·
|
any
provisions relating to the redemption of the shares of such
series;
|
|
|
·
|
any
limitations on our ability to pay dividends or make distributions on, or
acquire or redeem, other securities while shares of such series are
outstanding;
|
|
|
·
|
any
conditions or restrictions on our ability to issue additional shares of
such series or other securities;
|
|
|
·
|
if
applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. Federal income tax
considerations; and
|
|
|
·
|
any
other relative power, preferences and participating, optional or special
rights of shares of such series, and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof.
|
All
shares of preferred stock that we may issue will be identical and of equal rank
except as to the particular terms thereof that may be fixed by our Board of
Directors, and all shares of each series of preferred stock will be identical
and of equal rank except as to the dates from which cumulative dividends thereon
will be cumulative.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR DEBT SECURITIES
We
may issue debt securities in one or more series which, if publicly offered, will
be under an indenture to be entered into between us and a trustee. The specific
terms of each series of debt securities we publicly offer will be described in
the particular prospectus supplement relating to that series. For a complete
description of the terms of a particular series of debt securities, you should
read both this prospectus and the prospectus supplement relating to that
particular series.
The
prospectus supplement, which will accompany this prospectus, will describe the
particular series of debt securities being offered by including:
|
|
·
|
the
designation or title of the series of debt securities;
|
|
|
·
|
the
total principal amount of the series of debt
securities;
|
|
|
·
|
the
percentage of the principal amount at which the series of debt securities
will be offered;
|
|
|
·
|
the
date or dates on which principal will be payable;
|
|
|
·
|
the
rate or rates (which may be either fixed or variable) and/or the method of
determining such rate or rates of interest, if any;
|
|
|
·
|
the
date or dates from which any interest will accrue, or the method of
determining such date or dates, and the date or dates on which any
interest will be payable;
|
|
|
·
|
the
terms for redemption, extension or early repayment, if
any;
|
|
|
·
|
the
currencies in which the series of debt securities are issued and
payable;
|
|
|
·
|
the
provision for any sinking fund;
|
|
|
·
|
any
restrictive covenants;
|
|
|
·
|
any
events of default;
|
|
|
·
|
whether
the series of debt securities are issuable in certificated
form;
|
|
|
·
|
any
provisions for defeasance or covenant
defeasance;
|
|
|
·
|
any
special U.S. Federal income tax implications, including, if applicable,
U.S. Federal income tax considerations relating to original issue
discount;
|
|
|
·
|
any
provisions for convertibility or exchangeability of the debt securities
into or for any other securities;
|
|
|
·
|
whether
the debt securities are subject to subordination and the terms of such
subordination;
|
|
|
·
|
the
listing, if any, on a securities exchange;
|
|
|
·
|
the
name and address of the trustee; and
|
|
|
·
|
any
other terms.
|
The
debt securities may be secured or unsecured obligations. Under the provisions of
the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue debt
only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals
at least 200% after each issuance of debt. Unless the prospectus supplement
states otherwise, principal (and premium, if any) and interest, if any, will be
paid by us in immediately available funds.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR WARRANTS
We
may issue warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or
debt securities from time to time. Such warrants may be issued independently or
together with one of our Securities and may be attached or separate from such
securities. We will issue each series of warrants under a separate warrant
agreement to be entered into between us and a warrant agent. The warrant agent
will act solely as our agent and will not assume any obligation or relationship
of agency for or with holders or beneficial owners of warrants.
A
prospectus supplement will describe the particular terms of any series of
warrants we may issue, including the following:
|
|
·
|
the
title of such warrants;
|
|
|
·
|
the
aggregate number of such warrants;
|
|
|
·
|
the
price or prices at which such warrants will be issued;
|
|
|
·
|
the
currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in which the price
of such warrants may be payable;
|
|
|
·
|
the
number of shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities
issuable upon exercise of such warrants;
|
|
|
·
|
the
price at which and the currency or currencies, including composite
currencies, in which the shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities purchasable upon exercise of such warrants may be
purchased;
|
|
|
·
|
the
date on which the right to exercise such warrants will commence and the
date on which such right will expire;
|
|
|
·
|
whether
such warrants will be issued in registered form or bearer
form;
|
|
|
·
|
if
applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants which may be
exercised at any one time;
|
|
|
·
|
if
applicable, the number of such warrants issued with each share of common
stock, preferred stock or debt securities;
|
|
|
·
|
if
applicable, the date on and after which such warrants and the related
shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities will be
separately transferable;
|
|
|
·
|
information
with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
|
|
|
·
|
if
applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. Federal income tax
considerations; and
|
|
|
·
|
any
other terms of such warrants, including terms, procedures and limitations
relating to the exchange and exercise of such
warrants.
|
We
and the warrant agent may amend or supplement the warrant agreement for a series
of warrants without the consent of the holders of the warrants issued thereunder
to effect changes that are not inconsistent with the provisions of the warrants
and that do not materially and adversely affect the interests of the holders of
the warrants.
Under
the 1940 Act, we may generally only offer warrants
provided
that (1) the
warrants expire by their terms within ten years; (2) the exercise or conversion
price is not less than the current market value at the date of issuance; (3) our
stockholders authorize the proposal to issue such warrants, and our Board of
Directors approves such issuance on the basis that the issuance is in our best
interests and the best interest of our stockholders; and (4) if the warrants are
accompanied by other securities, the warrants are not separately transferable
unless no class of such warrants and the securities accompanying them has been
publicly distributed. The 1940 Act also provides that the amount of our voting
securities that would result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants at
the time of issuance may not exceed 25% of our outstanding voting
securities.
REGULATION
We
are a closed-end, non-diversified investment company that has filed an election
to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act and has
elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The 1940 Act
contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between business
development companies and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or
sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or
underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than
"interested persons," as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the
1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to
cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development company
unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
We
may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired directly from issuers
in privately negotiated transactions. With respect to such securities, we may,
for the purpose of public resale, be deemed an "underwriter" as that term is
defined in the Securities Act. Our intention is to not write (sell) or buy put
or call options to manage risks associated with the publicly-traded securities
of our portfolio companies, except that we may enter into hedging transactions
to manage the risks associated with interest rate and other market fluctuations.
However, in connection with an investment or acquisition financing of a
portfolio company, we may purchase or otherwise receive warrants to purchase the
common stock of the portfolio company. Similarly, in connection with an
acquisition, we may acquire rights to require the issuers of acquired securities
or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances. We also do
not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed
the limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, except with respect to
money market funds we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock
of any registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value of our
total assets in the securities of one investment company or invest more than 10%
of the value of our total assets in the securities of more than one investment
company. With regard to that portion of our portfolio invested in securities
issued by investment companies, it should be noted that such investments subject
our stockholders indirectly to additional expenses. None of these policies are
fundamental and may be changed without stockholder approval.
Qualifying
Assets
Under
the 1940 Act, a business development company may not acquire any asset other
than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are
referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made,
qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company's total assets. The
principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the
following:
(1)
Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the
issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions)
is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during
the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company,
or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC.
An "eligible portfolio company" is defined in the 1940 Act and rules adopted
pursuant thereto as any issuer which:
|
|
(a)
|
is
organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in,
the United States;
|
|
|
(b)
|
is
not an investment company (other than a small business investment company
wholly owned by the business development company) or a company that would
be an investment company but for exclusions under the 1940 Act for certain
financial companies such as banks, brokers, commercial finance companies,
mortgage companies and insurance companies; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
satisfies
any of the following:
|
|
|
1.
|
|
does
not have any class of securities with respect to which a broker or dealer
may extend margin credit;
|
|
|
2.
|
|
is
controlled by a business development company or a group of companies
including a business development company and the business development
company has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible
portfolio company;
|
|
|
3.
|
|
is
a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4
million and capital and surplus of not less than $2
million;
|
|
|
4.
|
|
does
not have any class of securities listed on a national securities exchange;
or
|
|
|
5.
|
|
has
a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an
aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity
of less than $250 million.
|
(2)
Securities in companies that were eligible portfolio companies when we made our
initial investment if certain other requirements are satisfied.
(3)
Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we control.
(4)
Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an
investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in
transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to
reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its
securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material
assistance other than conventional lending or financing agreements.
(5)
Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a
private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we
already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio
company.
(6)
Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to
securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of
warrants or rights relating to such securities.
(7)
Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt
securities maturing in one year or less from the time of
investment.
In
addition, a business development company must have been organized and have its
principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the
purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2),
(3) or (4) above.
Managerial
Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In
order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the
70% test, the business development company must either control the issuer of the
securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities
(other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial
assistance; except that, where the business development company purchases such
securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of
the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance.
Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things,
any arrangement whereby the business development company, through its directors,
officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide,
significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or
business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Temporary
Investments
Pending
investment in other types of "qualifying assets," as described above, our
investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, including money market funds,
U.S. government securities or high quality debt securities maturing in one year
or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as
temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets.
Typically, we will invest in money market funds, U.S. treasury bills or in
repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued
by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the
purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the
simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed upon future
date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that
reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements.
However, if more than 25% of our total assets constitute repurchase agreements
from a single counterparty, we would not meet the diversification tests in order
to qualify as a RIC for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not intend
to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this
limit. Our Investment Adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the
counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement
transactions.
Senior
Securities
We
are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of
indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset
coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately
after each such issuance. In addition, while any preferred stock or public debt
securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any
distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares
unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios after giving effect to such
distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of
our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset
coverage. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see "Risk
Factors."
Code
of Ethics
We,
Prospect Capital Management and Prospect Administration have each adopted a code
of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures
for personal investments and restricts certain personal securities transactions.
Personnel subject to each code may invest in securities for their personal
investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us,
so long as such investments are made in accordance with the code's requirements.
For information on how to obtain a copy of each code of ethics, see "Available
Information."
Investment
Concentration
Our
investment objective is to generate both current income and long-term capital
appreciation through debt and equity investments. While we are diversifying the
portfolio, many of our existing investments are in the energy and energy related
industries.
Compliance
Policies and Procedures
We
and our Investment Adviser have adopted and implemented written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the U.S. Federal
securities laws, and are required to review these compliance policies and
procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their
implementation, and to designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible
for administering the policies and procedures. Brian H. Oswald serves as our
Chief Compliance Officer.
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
We
have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Prospect Capital Management.
The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of Prospect Capital Management are set
forth below. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Prospect Capital
Management and our independent directors, and, accordingly, are subject to
change.
Introduction
. As
an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, Prospect Capital
Management has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its
clients. As part of this duty, Prospect Capital Management recognizes that it
must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and
in the best interests of its clients.
These
policies and procedures for voting proxies for Prospect Capital Management's
Investment Advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule
206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.
Proxy
policies
. These policies are designed to be responsive to the
wide range of subjects that may be the subject of a proxy vote. These policies
are not exhaustive due to the variety of proxy voting issues that Prospect
Capital Management may be required to consider. In general, Prospect Capital
Management will vote proxies in accordance with these guidelines unless: (1)
Prospect Capital Management has determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject matter of
the vote is not covered by these guidelines, (3) a material conflict of interest
is present, or (4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to vote
contrary to its general guidelines to maximize stockholder value and vote in its
clients' best interests. In such cases, a decision on how to vote will be made
by the Proxy Voting Committee (as described below). In reviewing proxy issues,
Prospect Capital Management will apply the following general
policies:
Elections of
directors
. In general, Prospect Capital Management will vote
in favor of the management-proposed slate of directors. If there is a proxy
fight for seats on the Board of Directors or Prospect Capital Management
determines that there are other compelling reasons for withholding votes for
directors, the Proxy Voting Committee will determine the appropriate vote on the
matter. Prospect Capital Management believes that directors have a duty to
respond to stockholder actions that have received significant stockholder
support. Prospect Capital Management may withhold votes for directors that fail
to act on key issues such as failure to implement proposals to declassify
boards, failure to implement a majority vote requirement, failure to submit a
rights plan to a stockholder vote and failure to act on tender offers where a
majority of stockholders have tendered their shares. Finally, Prospect Capital
Management may withhold votes for directors of non-U.S. issuers where there is
insufficient information about the nominees disclosed in the proxy
statement.
Appointment of
auditors
. Prospect Capital Management believes that the
Company remains in the best position to choose the auditors and will generally
support management's recommendation.
Changes in capital
structure
. Changes in a company's charter, articles of
incorporation or by-laws may be required by state or U.S. Federal regulation. In
general, Prospect Capital Management will cast its votes in accordance with the
Company's management on such proposal. However, the Proxy Voting Committee will
review and analyze on a case-by-case basis any proposals regarding changes in
corporate structure that are not required by state or U.S. Federal
regulation.
Corporate restructurings, mergers
and acquisitions
. Prospect Capital Management believes proxy
votes dealing with corporate reorganizations are an extension of the investment
decision. Accordingly, the Proxy Voting Committee will analyze such proposals on
a case-by-case basis.
Proposals affecting the rights of
stockholders
. Prospect Capital Management will generally vote
in favor of proposals that give stockholders a greater voice in the affairs of
the Company and oppose any measure that seeks to limit those rights. However,
when analyzing such proposals, Prospect Capital Management will weigh the
financial impact of the proposal against the impairment of the rights of
stockholders.
Corporate
governance
. Prospect Capital Management recognizes the
importance of good corporate governance in ensuring that management and the
Board of Directors fulfill their obligations to the stockholders. Prospect
Capital Management favors proposals promoting transparency and accountability
within a company.
Anti-takeover
measures
. The Proxy Voting Committee will evaluate, on a
case-by-case basis, proposals regarding anti-takeover measures to determine the
measure's likely effect on stockholder value dilution.
Stock
splits
. Prospect Capital Management will generally vote with
the management of the Company on stock split matters.
Limited liability of
directors
. Prospect Capital Management will generally vote
with management on matters that would affect the limited liability of
directors.
Social and corporate
responsibility
. The Proxy Voting Committee may review and
analyze on a case-by-case basis proposals relating to social, political and
environmental issues to determine whether they will have a financial impact on
stockholder value. Prospect Capital Management may abstain from voting on social
proposals that do not have a readily determinable financial impact on
stockholder value.
Proxy voting
procedures
. Prospect Capital Management will generally vote
proxies in accordance with these guidelines. In circumstances in which (1)
Prospect Capital Management has determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject matter of
the vote is not covered by these guidelines, (3) a material conflict of interest
is present, or (4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to vote
contrary to its general guidelines to maximize stockholder value and vote in its
clients' best interests, the Proxy Voting Committee will vote the
proxy.
Proxy voting
committee
. Prospect Capital Management has formed a proxy
voting committee to establish general proxy policies and consider specific proxy
voting matters as necessary. In addition, members of the committee may contact
the management of the Company and interested stockholder groups as necessary to
discuss proxy issues. Members of the committee will include relevant senior
personnel. The committee may also evaluate proxies where we face a potential
conflict of interest (as discussed below). Finally, the committee monitors
adherence to guidelines, and reviews the policies contained in this statement
from time to time.
Conflicts of
interest
. Prospect Capital Management recognizes that there
may be a potential conflict of interest when it votes a proxy solicited by an
issuer that is its advisory client or a client or customer of one of our
affiliates or with whom it has another business or personal relationship that
may affect how it votes on the issuer's proxy. Prospect Capital Management
believes that adherence to these policies and procedures ensures that proxies
are voted with only its clients' best interests in mind. To ensure that its
votes are not the product of a conflict of interests, Prospect Capital
Management requires that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process
(including members of the Proxy Voting Committee) disclose to the chairman of
the Proxy Voting Committee any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and
any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy
vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote
administration are prohibited from revealing how Prospect Capital Management
intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from
interested parties.
Proxy voting
. Each
account's custodian will forward all relevant proxy materials to Prospect
Capital Management, either electronically or in physical form to the address of
record that Prospect Capital Management has provided to the
custodian.
Proxy
recordkeeping
. Prospect Capital Management must retain the
following documents pertaining to proxy voting:
|
|
·
|
copies
of its proxy voting polices and procedures;
|
|
|
·
|
copies
of all proxy statements;
|
|
|
·
|
records
of all votes cast by Prospect Capital Management;
|
|
|
·
|
copies
of all documents created by Prospect Capital Management that were material
to making a decision how to vote proxies or that memorializes the basis
for that decision; and
|
|
|
·
|
copies
of all written client requests for information with regard to how Prospect
Capital Management voted proxies on behalf of the client as well as any
written responses provided.
|
All
of the above-referenced records will be maintained and preserved for a period of
not less than five years from the end of the fiscal year during which the last
entry was made. The first two years of records must be maintained at our
office.
Proxy voting
records
. Clients may obtain information about how Prospect
Capital Management voted proxies on their behalf by making a written request for
proxy voting information to: Compliance Officer, Prospect Capital Management
LLC, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes a variety of regulatory requirements on
publicly-held companies. In addition to our Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officers' required certifications as to the accuracy of our financial reporting,
we are also required to disclose the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as well as report on our assessment of our internal controls over
financial reporting, the latter of which must be audited by our independent
registered public accounting firm.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires us to continually review our policies and
procedures to ensure that we remain in compliance with all rules promulgated
under the Act.
CUSTODIAN,
TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our
Securities are held under a custody agreement by U.S. Bank National Association.
The address of the custodian is: 1555 North Rivercenter Drive, MK-WI-5302,
Milwaukee, WI 53212, Attention: Mutual Fund Custody Account Administrator,
facsimile: (866) 350-1430. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company acts as
our transfer agent, dividend paying agent and registrar. The principal business
address of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company is 59 Maiden Lane, New
York, NY 10007, telephone number: (718) 921-8200.
BROKERAGE
ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since
we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in privately negotiated
transactions, we infrequently use brokers in the normal course of our business.
The aggregate amount of brokerage commissions paid by us during the three most
recent fiscal years is $101,746. Subject to policies established by our Board of
Directors, Prospect Capital Management is primarily responsible for the
execution of the publicly-traded securities portion of our portfolio
transactions and the allocation of brokerage commissions.
Prospect
Capital Management does not expect to execute transactions through any
particular broker or dealer, but seeks to obtain the best net results for the
Company, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable
brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution,
and operational facilities of the firm and the firm's risk and skill in
positioning blocks of securities. While Prospect Capital Management generally
seeks reasonably competitive trade execution costs, the Company will not
necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available. Subject to applicable
legal requirements, Prospect Capital Management may select a broker based partly
upon brokerage or research services provided to it and the Company and any other
clients. In return for such services, we may pay a higher commission than other
brokers would charge if Prospect Capital Management determines in good faith
that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services
provided.
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
We
may sell the Securities pursuant to this prospectus and a prospectus supplement
in any of four ways (or in any combination): (a) through underwriters or
dealers; (b) directly to a limited number of purchasers or to a single
purchaser, including existing stockholders in a rights offering; (c) through
agents; or (d) directly to our stockholders and others through the issuance of
transferable or non-transferable rights to our stockholders. In the case of a
rights offering, the applicable prospectus supplement will set forth the number
of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of each right and the
other terms of such rights offering. We will not sell shares of
common stock in a rights offering to our stockholder at a price below NAV per
share under this prospectus. Any underwriter or agent involved in the
offer and sale of the Securities will also be named in the applicable prospectus
supplement. The Securities may be sold "at-the-market" to or through a market
maker or into an existing trading market for the securities, on an exchange or
otherwise. The prospectus supplement will set forth the terms of the offering of
such securities, including:
|
|
·
|
the
name or names of any underwriters or agents and the amounts of Securities
underwritten or placed by each of them;
|
|
|
·
|
the
offering price of the Securities and the proceeds to us and any discounts,
commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to underwriters or
agents; and
|
|
|
·
|
any
securities exchanges on which the Securities may be
listed.
|
In
addition, pursuant to the terms of certain applicable registration rights
agreements entered into by us
or
that we may enter into in the future
, certain of our stockholders may
resell shares of our common stock under this prospectus and as described in any
related prospectus supplement.
We
may use Securities to acquire investments in companies, the terms of which will
be further disclosed in a prospectus supplement if such stock is issued in an
offering hereunder.
Any
offering price and any discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to
underwriters or agents may be changed from time to time.
We
may sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common
stock, at a price below the current net asset value of our common stock in
certain circumstances, including if (i)(1) the holders of a majority of our
shares (or, if less, at least 67% of a quorum consisting of a majority of our
shares) and a similar majority of the holders of our shares who are not
affiliated persons of us approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is
less than the current net asset value, and (2) a majority of our Directors who
have no financial interest in the transaction and a majority of our independent
Directors (a) determine that such sale is in our and our stockholders' best
interests and (b) in consultation with any underwriter or underwriters of the
offering, make a good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior
to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase
such shares, or immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price
at which such shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely
approximates the market value of such shares, less any distributing commission
or discount or if (ii) a majority of the number of the beneficial holders of our
common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting, without regard to whether a
majority of such shares are voted in favor of the proposal, approve the sale of
our common stock at a price that is less than the current net asset value per
share. As stated above, we will not use this prospectus to sell our common
stock to our shareholders in a rights offering at a price below current net
asset value.
If
underwriters are used in the sale of any Securities, Securities acquired by the
underwriters for their own account may be resold from time to time in one or
more transactions, including negotiated transactions, at a fixed public offering
price or at varying prices determined at the time of sale. The Securities may be
either offered to the public through underwriting syndicates represented by
managing underwriters, or directly by underwriters. Generally, any obligations
by the underwriters to purchase the Securities will be subject to certain
conditions precedent.
The
maximum commission or discount to be received by any FINRA member or independent
broker-dealer will not exceed 8%. In connection with any rights offering to our
stockholders, we may also enter into a standby underwriting arrangement with one
or more underwriters pursuant to which the underwriter(s) will purchase our
common stock remaining unsubscribed for after the rights offering.
We
may sell the Securities through agents from time to time. The prospectus
supplement will name any agent involved in the offer or sale of the Securities
and any commissions we pay to them. Generally, any agent will be acting on a
best efforts basis for the period of its appointment.
Agents,
dealers and underwriters may be entitled to indemnification by us against
certain civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act or to
contribution with respect to payments which the agents or underwriters may be
required to make in respect thereof. Agents, dealers and underwriters may be
customers of, engage in transactions with, or perform services for us in the
ordinary course of business.
We
may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or sell Securities
outside of this prospectus to third parties in privately negotiated
transactions. If the applicable prospectus supplement indicates, in connection
with those derivatives, the third parties may sell Securities covered by this
prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement, including in short sale
transactions. If so, the third party may use Securities pledged by us or
borrowed from us or others to settle those sales or to close out any related
open borrowings of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement
of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of stock. The
third party in such sale transactions will be an underwriter and, if not
identified in this prospectus, will be identified in the applicable prospectus
supplement (or a post-effective amendment). We or one of our affiliates may loan
or pledge Securities to a financial institution or other third party that in
turn may sell the securities using this prospectus. Such
financial
institution or third party may transfer its short position to investors in our
Securities or in connection with a simultaneous offering of other Securities
offered by this prospectus or otherwise.
Any
of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement will be listed on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market, or another exchange on which our common stock
is traded.
In
order to comply with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, the
Securities offered hereby will be sold in such jurisdictions only through
registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in certain states, the
Securities may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for
sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or
qualification requirements is available and is complied with.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain
legal matters regarding the securities offered by this prospectus will be passed
upon for the Company by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York,
NY, and Venable LLP as special Maryland counsel.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO
Seidman, LLP is the independent registered public accounting firm of the
Company.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We
have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form N-2, together with all
amendments and related exhibits, under the Securities Act, with respect to our
Securities offered by this prospectus. The registration statement contains
additional information about us and the Securities being registered by this
prospectus. We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the
informational requirements of the Exchange Act. This information and the
information specifically regarding how we voted proxies relating to portfolio
securities for the period ended June 30, 2009, are available free of charge by
contacting us at 10 East 40th Street, 44th floor, New York, NY 10016 or by
telephone at toll-free (888) 748-0702. You may inspect and copy these reports,
proxy statements and other information, as well as the registration statement
and related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at
100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090 or
by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the SEC's Internet site
at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements
and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at the following E-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by
writing the SEC's Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
|
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and
June 30, 2009 (Audited)
|
F-1
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) — For the Three and Six Months Ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-2
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (UNAUDITED) — For the Six Months Ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-3
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) — For the Six Months
Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-4
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and June 30,
2009 (Audited)
|
F-5
|
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-21
|
|
AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
F-41
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — June 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-42
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS — For the Years Ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
F-43
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS — For the Years Ended June 30,
2009, 2008 and 2007
|
F-44
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — For the Years Ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
F-45
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-46
|
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-54
|
|
|
|
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
Assets
(Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
at fair value (cost of $633,636 and $531,424, respectively, Note
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments (cost of $165,867 and $187,105, respectively)
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
Affiliate
investments (cost of $68,052 and $33,544, respectively)
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments (cost of $399,717 and $310,775, respectively)
|
|
|
389,758
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
Total
investments at fair value
|
|
|
648,135
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
in money market funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
Receivables
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest,
net
|
|
|
5,723
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Due
from Prospect Administration (Note 8)
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Deferred
financing costs, net
|
|
|
5,891
|
|
|
|
6,951
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
689,080
|
|
|
$
|
667,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
facility payable (Note 10)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
Dividend
payable
|
|
|
25,894
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Due
to Prospect Administration (Note 8)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
Due
to Prospect Capital Management (Note 8)
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
5,871
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
8,039
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
51,603
|
|
|
|
134,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (100,000,000 and 100,000,000 common
shares authorized, respectively; 63,349,746 and 42,943,084 issued and
outstanding, respectively)
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
Paid-in
capital in excess of par
|
|
|
741,520
|
|
|
|
545,707
|
|
|
Under/(over)
distributed net investment income
|
|
|
(14,326
|
)
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
|
Accumulated
realized losses on investments
|
|
|
(104,279
|
)
|
|
|
(53,050
|
)
|
|
Unrealized
appreciation on investments
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
Net
Assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per
Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
The Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
For
The Three Months Ended
December
31,
|
|
|
For
The Six Months Ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of ($52), $62, ($19), and
$109, respectively)
|
|
$
|
5,052
|
|
|
$
|
5,075
|
|
|
$
|
9,643
|
|
|
$
|
11,797
|
|
|
Affiliate
investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $0, $0, $0, and $0,
respectively)
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
11,091
|
|
|
|
21,343
|
|
|
|
21,365
|
|
|
Total
interest income
|
|
|
18,539
|
|
|
|
17,241
|
|
|
|
33,374
|
|
|
|
34,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
|
|
10,360
|
|
|
|
9,168
|
|
|
Money
market funds
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
Total
dividend income
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
|
9,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income: (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control/affiliate
investments
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
Gain
on Patriot acquisition (Note 2)
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
12,996
|
|
|
Total
other income
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment
Income
|
|
|
28,883
|
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
58,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
management fee (Note 8)
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
6,385
|
|
|
|
5,763
|
|
|
Income
incentive fee (Note 8)
|
|
|
4,231
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
7,311
|
|
|
|
8,865
|
|
|
Total
investment advisory fees
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
13,696
|
|
|
|
14,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and credit facility expenses
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
Sub-administration
fees (Including former Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance
Officer)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
Legal
fees
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
Valuation
services
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
Audit,
compliance and tax related fees
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
Allocation
of overhead from Prospect Administration (Note 8)
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
Insurance
expense
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
Directors'
fees
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
Other
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
Tax
expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
Total Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
11,958
|
|
|
|
10,253
|
|
|
|
21,157
|
|
|
|
22,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment
Income
|
|
|
16,925
|
|
|
|
11,960
|
|
|
|
29,243
|
|
|
|
35,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
Net
change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on
investments
|
|
|
17,451
|
|
|
|
(5,452
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(16,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Net
Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per share:
(Note 7)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
Dividends/distributions
declared per share:
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For
The Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease)
Increase in Net Assets from Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment income
|
|
$
|
29,243
|
|
|
$
|
35,462
|
|
|
Net
realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
Net
change in unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(16,601
|
)
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Net
Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
|
20,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends/Distributions to
Shareholders:
|
|
|
(67,721
|
)
|
|
|
(23,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Share Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from capital shares sold
|
|
|
98,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Less:
Offering costs of public share offerings
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fair
value of equity issued in conjunction with Patriot
acquisition
|
|
|
92,800
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Reinvestment
of dividends/distributions
|
|
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets
Resulting from Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
195,833
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Net
Assets:
|
|
|
104,881
|
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
Net
assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
429,623
|
|
|
Net Assets at End of
Period
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Share Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
sold
|
|
|
11,431,797
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Shares
issued for Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
8,444,068
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Shares
issued through reinvestment of dividends/distributions
|
|
|
530,797
|
|
|
|
117,549
|
|
|
Net
increase in capital share activity
|
|
|
20,406,662
|
|
|
|
117,549
|
|
|
Shares
outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding at End of
Period
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
29,637,928
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For
The Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
For
The Six Months Ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
|
Net
realized loss (gain) on investments
|
|
|
51,229
|
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
Net
change in unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
16,601
|
|
|
Accretion
of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(6,670
|
)
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
Gain
on settlement of net profits interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(12,576
|
)
|
|
Gain
on Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
(5,714
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
for purchases of investments
|
|
|
(7,321
|
)
|
|
|
(70,513
|
)
|
|
Payment-in-kind
interest
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of investments and collection of investment
principal
|
|
|
69,735
|
|
|
|
13,077
|
|
|
Purchases
of cash equivalents
|
|
|
(199,997
|
)
|
|
|
(19,999
|
)
|
|
Sales
of cash equivalents
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
|
19,999
|
|
|
Net
decrease investments in money market funds
|
|
|
75,317
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in interest receivable
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
Decrease
in dividends receivable
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
Decrease
in loan principal receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Increase
in receivable for managerial assistance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
Increase
in receivable for potential deal expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in other receivables
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Increase
in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
|
Decrease
in due from Prospect Administration
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Increase
in other assets
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Decrease
in due to Prospect Administration
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in due to Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
(Decrease)
increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
Decrease
in other liabilities
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
Net
Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities:
|
|
|
155,128
|
|
|
|
(23,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Patriot, net of cash acquired (Note 2)
|
|
|
(106,586
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
Cash Used In Investing Activities:
|
|
|
(106,586
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
under credit facility
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
54,500
|
|
|
Payments
under credit facility
|
|
|
(174,800
|
)
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
Financing
costs paid and deferred
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
98,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Offering
costs from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Dividends/distributions
paid
|
|
|
(36,469
|
)
|
|
|
(22,221
|
)
|
|
Net
Cash Provided By Financing Activities:
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
|
|
25,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
(Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(6,098
|
)
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
Cash
balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
Cash
Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
3,844
|
|
|
$
|
2,438
|
|
|
Cash
Paid For Interest
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash
Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value of shares issued in connection with Patriot
acquisition
|
|
$
|
92,800
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Fair
value of shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
5,358
|
|
|
$
|
2,901
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine, Inc.
|
South
Carolina / Manufacturing
|
Senior
Secured Note – Tranche A (10.50%, due 4/01/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
$
|
21,266
|
|
|
$
|
21,266
|
|
|
$
|
21,266
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
Secured Note – Tranche B (11.50% plus 6.00% PIK, due 4/01/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
Secured Note – Tranche B (15.00%, due 10/30/2010)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock – Series A (6,143 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
Common Stock (6 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,861
|
|
|
|
25,802
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AWCNC,
LLC
(20)
|
North
Carolina / Machinery
|
Members
Units – Class A (1,800,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Members
Units – Class B-1 (1 unit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Members
Units – Class B-2 (7,999,999 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J
Cladding LLC
|
Texas
/ Metal Services and Minerals
|
Warrants
(400 warrants, expiring 3/30/2014)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. ("CCEHI")
(5)
|
Maine
/ Biomass Power
|
Common
Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coalbed,
Inc. / Coalbed, LLC
(6)
|
Tennessee
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Senior
Secured Note (14.50%, in non-accrual status effective 10/21/2009, due
6/30/2010)
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fischbein,
LLC
|
North
Carolina / Machinery
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 6.50% PIK, due 5/01/2013)
|
|
|
3,707
|
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest – Class A (2,800,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
Marine Services LLC
|
Louisiana
/ Shipping Vessels
|
Subordinated
Secured Note (16.00% PIK, due 12/31/2011)
(3)
|
|
|
7,960
|
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net
Profits Interest (22.50% payable on Equity distributions)
(3),
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(8)
|
Texas
/ Gas Gathering and Processing
|
Senior
Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/22/2018)
(3)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/23/2018)
(3)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (100 shares)
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.
(9)
|
North
Carolina / Contracting
|
Senior
Demand Note (15.00%, due 12/31/2009)
(10)
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series A (10 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (49 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
Alberta,
Canada /
Production
Services
|
Bridge
Loan (15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, in non-accrual status effective 5/01/2009,
due 12/31/2009)
|
|
$
|
11,418
|
|
|
$
|
11,199
|
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Note (15.00%, in non-accrual status effective 5/01/2009, due
12/31/2009)
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (1,781 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
NRG
Manufacturing, Inc.
|
Texas
/
Manufacturing
|
Senior
Secured Note (16.50%, due 8/31/2011)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (800 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
26,690
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nupla
Corporation
|
California
/ Home
&
Office
Furnishings,
Housewares &
Durable
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50% – 7.25% plus 2.00% default interest, due
9/04/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (8.00% plus 2.00% default interest, due
9/04/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (10.00% plus 5.00% PIK, in non-accrual status effective
4/01/2009, due 3/04/2013)
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Class A (475 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Class B (1,045 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (1,140,584 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V
Industries, Inc.
|
Pennsylvania
/
Manufacturing
|
Warrants
(200,000 warrants, expiring 6/30/2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (545,107 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,768
|
|
|
|
11,962
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sidump'r
Trailer Company, Inc.
|
Nebraska
/
Automobile
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50% – 7.25%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008,
due 1/10/2011)
(4)
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (7.25%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008,
due 1/10/2011)
(4)
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (8.75%, in-non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008,
due 1/10/2011)
(4)
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan C (16.50% PIK, in non-accrual status effective
9/27/2008, due 7/10/2011)
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan D (7.25%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008,
due 7/10/2011)
(4)
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock (49,635 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (64,050 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.
(11)
|
Kentucky
/
Mining,
Steel,
|
Senior
Secured Note (15.77%, in non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009, due
12/31/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
Iron
and
Non-Precious
Metals
|
Junior
Secured Note (15.77%, in non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009, due
12/31/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
41,836
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
and
Coal
Production
|
Common
Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Control Investments
|
|
|
|
165,867
|
|
|
|
191,898
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate
Investments (5.00% to 24.99% voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian
Energy Holdings LLC
(12)
|
West
Virginia / Construction Services
|
Senior
Secured Debt – Tranche A (14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, due
1/31/2011)
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
1,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt – Tranche B (14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, past
due)
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series A (200 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series B (241 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series C (500 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(6,065 warrants, expiring 2/13/2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(6,025 warrants, expiring 6/17/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(25,000 warrants, expiring 11/30/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Biotronic
NeuroNetwork
(17)
|
Michigan
/ Healthcare
|
Senior
Secured Note (11.50% plus 1.00% PIK, due 2/21/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
27,014
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock (9,925 shares)
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,527
|
|
|
|
30,511
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boxercraft
Incorporated
|
Georgia
/ Textiles
&
Leather
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 9/16/2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (9.50% – 10.50%, due 9/16/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (10.00% – 11.00%, due 9/16/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan C (12.00% plus 6.50% PIK, due 3/16/2014)
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock (1,000,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (10,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
|
|
12,395
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
KTPS
Holdings, LLC
|
Colorado
/ Textiles
&
Leather
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 1/31/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (10.50% – 11.25%, due 1/31/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (12.00%, due 1/31/2012)
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan C (12.00% plus 6.00% PIK, due 3/31/2012)
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest – Class A (730 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest – Common (199,795 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
Miller
Petroleum, Inc.
|
Tennessee
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Warrants,
Common Stock (2,117,689 warrants, expiring 5/04/2010 to 12/31/2014)
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Smart,
LLC
(15)
|
New
York /
Diversified
/
Conglomerate
Service
|
Membership
Interest – Class B (1,218 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest – Class D (1 unit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate
Investments (5.00% to 24.99% voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sport
Helmets Holdings, LLC
(15)
|
New
York /
Personal
& Nondurable
Consumer
Products
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 12/14/2013)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (4.26% – 6.00%, due 12/14/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (4.76% – 6.50%, due 12/14/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
5,072
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt – Series A (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
6/14/2014)
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
|
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt – Series B (10.00% plus 5.00% PIK, due
6/14/2014)
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (20,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,176
|
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
68,052
|
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADAPCO,
Inc.
|
Florida
/ Ecological
|
Common
Stock (5,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Aircraft
Fasteners International, LLC
|
California
/
Machinery
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 11/01/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan (3.92% – 5.40%, due 11/01/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan (12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 5/01/2013)
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
|
|
4,555
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock (32,500 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,604
|
|
|
|
8,684
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
American
Gilsonite Company
|
Utah
/ Specialty Minerals
|
Senior
Subordinated Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 3/14/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
15,078
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest Units in AGC/PEP, LLC (99.9999%)
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
17,806
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
Arrowhead
General Insurance Agency, Inc.
(17)
|
California
/ Insurance
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan (10.25% plus 2.50% PIK, due 2/8/2013)
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Borga,
Inc.
|
California
/ Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal
Production
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50% – 5.00% plus 3.00% default interest, due
5/06/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (8.50% plus 3.00% default interest, due 5/6/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan C (12.00% plus 4.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest,
due 5/06/2010)
|
|
|
8,453
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(33,750 warrants)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,763
|
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caleel
+ Hayden, LLC
(15)
|
Colorado
/ Personal & Nondurable
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan B (9.75% – 10.00%, due 11/10/2011)
(4)
|
|
$
|
8,425
|
|
|
$
|
8,399
|
|
|
$
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
Consumer
Products
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 4.50% PIK, due 11/10/2012)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,779
|
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (7,500 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Options
in Mineral Fusion Natural Brands, LLC (11,662 options)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
14,545
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castro
Cheese Company, Inc.
|
Texas
/ Food Products
|
Junior
Secured Note (11.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 2/28/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
|
|
7,505
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,505
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copernicus
Group
|
North
Carolina / Healthcare
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50% – 10.50%, due 10/08/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (10.50% – 11.50%, due 10/08/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
5,205
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 6.00% PIK – 10.00% plus 10.00% PIK, due
4/08/2014)
|
|
|
12,741
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series A (1,000,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series C (212,121 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,215
|
|
|
|
17,293
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom
Direct, Inc.
(17)
|
Maryland
/ Printing & Publishing
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan (3.06%, due 12/31/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan (6.31%, due 12/31/2014)
(4)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deb
Shops, Inc.
(17)
|
Pennsylvania
/ Retail
|
Second
Lien Debt (1.00% plus 13.00% PIK, in non-accrual status effective
2/24/2009, due 10/23/2014)
|
|
|
16,378
|
|
|
|
14,607
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,607
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondback
Operating, LP
|
Oklahoma
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Net
Profits Interest (15.00% payable on Equity distributions)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXL
Acquisition Corp.
|
South
Carolina / Electronics
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 3/15/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (3.93% – 5.50%, due 3/15/2011)
(4)
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (4.18% – 5.75%, due 3/15/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan C (4.68% – 6.25%, due 3/15/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan D (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 3/15/2012)
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock – Class A (2,475 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock – Class B (25 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,322
|
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairchild
Industrial Products, Co.
(2)
|
North
Carolina / Electronics
|
Preferred
Stock – Class A (378 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock – Class B (28 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M
Oil & Gas, LLC
|
Texas
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Senior
Secured Note (13.00%, due 6/30/2010)
|
$
|
49,661
|
|
$
|
49,661
|
|
|
$
|
46,081
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net
Profits Interest (8.00% payable on Equity distributions)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,661
|
|
|
|
47,128
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson
Products Holdings, Inc.
(17)
|
Texas
/ Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal
Production
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan (8.00%, due 8/24/2015)
(4)
|
|
$
|
7,406
|
|
|
$
|
6,729
|
|
|
$
|
6,993
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,729
|
|
|
|
6,993
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC
Systems LP ("IEC") /Advanced Rig Services LLC ("ARS")
|
Texas
/ Oilfield Fabrication
|
IEC
Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 11/20/2012)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
ARS
Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 11/20/2012)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact
Products, LLC
|
Ohio
/ Machinery
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan (6.25% – 8.25%, due 9/09/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
|
|
7,704
|
|
|
|
7,753
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (10.00% plus 5.00%, due 9/09/2012)
|
|
|
5,548
|
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,963
|
|
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Label
Corp Holdings, Inc.
|
Nebraska
/ Printing & Publishing
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan (8.50%, due 8/08/2014)
(4)
|
|
|
5,823
|
|
|
|
5,193
|
|
|
|
5,306
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,193
|
|
|
|
5,306
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LHC
Holdings Corp.
(17)
|
Florida
/ Healthcare
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 11/30/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (4.31% – 5.75%, due 11/30/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 2.50% PIK, due 5/31/2013)
|
|
|
4,565
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
4,156
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest (125 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,487
|
|
|
|
6,549
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac
& Massey Holdings, LLC
|
Georgia
/ Food Products
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (10.00% plus 5.75% PIK, due 2/10/2013)
|
|
|
8,426
|
|
|
|
6,960
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (250 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,129
|
|
|
|
7,110
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick
Healthcare, LLC
|
Arizona
/ Healthcare
|
Second
Lien Debt (12.50% plus 3.50% PIK, due 4/30/2014)(3)
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
14,587
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwestern
Management
Services, LLC
|
Florida
/ Healthcare
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 12/13/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (4.24% – 5.75%, due 12/13/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (4.74% – 6.25%, due 12/13/2012)
(4)
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan (12.00% plus 3.00%, due 6/13/2013)
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (50 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,657
|
|
|
|
7,542
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prince
Mineral Company, Inc.
|
New
York / Metal Services and Minerals
|
Junior
Secured Term Loan
(5.29%
– 7.00%, due 12/21/2012)
(4)
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
|
$
|
7,633
|
|
|
$
|
7,816
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt
(13.00%
plus 1.00%, due 7/21/2013)
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
9,085
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitest
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(17)
|
Alabama
/ Pharmaceuticals
|
Second
Lien Debt (7.78%, due 4/30/2015)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional
Management Corp.
|
South
Carolina / Financial Services
|
Second
Lien Debt (13.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 6/29/2012)
(3)
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-O-M
Corporation
|
Missouri
/ Manufacturing
|
Revolving
Line of Credit (0.50%, due 2/08/2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan A (3.00% – 4.75%, due 2/08/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
5,440
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Term Loan B (4.50% – 6.25%, due 5/08/2013)
(4)
|
|
|
8,294
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
7,263
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 3.00% due 8/08/2013)
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,564
|
|
|
|
18,658
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shearer's
Foods, Inc.
|
Ohio
/
Food Products
|
Second
Lien Debt (15.00%, due 10/31/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,180
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
Membership
Interest Units in Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC (2,000 units)
(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
22,647
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker
Energy, LLC
|
Ohio
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Subordinated
Secured Revolving Credit Facility (12.00%, due 12/01/2011)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,217
|
|
|
|
28,360
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Overriding
Royalty Interests
(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,217
|
|
|
|
31,122
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriZetto
Group
(17)
|
California
/ Healthcare
|
Subordinated
Unsecured Note (12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, due 10/01/2016)(3)
|
|
|
15,319
|
|
|
|
15,185
|
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,181
|
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitek
(17)
|
Pennsylvania
/
Technical
Services
|
Second
Lien Debt (13.08%, due 12/31/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind
River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
|
Utah
/ Oil & Gas
Production
|
Senior
Secured Note (13.00% plus 3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 12/01/2008, due 7/31/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,627
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net
Profits Interest (5.00% payable on Equity distributions)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,627
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (Level 3
Investments)
|
|
|
|
399,598
|
|
|
|
389,640
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Level 3 Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
633,517
|
|
|
|
648,017
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
1 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allied
Defense Group, Inc.
|
Virginia
/ Aerospace & Defense
|
Common
Stock (10,000 shares)
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Dover
Saddlery, Inc.
|
Massachusetts
/ Retail
|
Common
Stock (30,974 shares)
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (Level 1
Investments)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
633,636
|
|
|
|
648,135
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
2 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds — Government Portfolio (Class
I)
|
|
|
|
16,070
|
|
|
|
16,070
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds — Government Portfolio (Class I)
(3)
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Victory
Government Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Total
Money Market Funds (Level 2 Investments)
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
105.3
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
Control
Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine, Inc.
|
South
Carolina / Manufacturing
|
Senior
Secured Note – Tranche A (10.50%, due 4/01/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
Secured Note – Tranche B (11.50% plus 6.00% PIK, due 4/01/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock – Series A (6,143 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
Common Stock (6 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,219
|
|
|
|
31,638
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J
Cladding LLC
|
Texas
/ Metal Services and Minerals
|
Senior
Secured Note (14.00%, due 3/30/2012)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(400 warrants, expiring 3/30/2014)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
|
Maine
/ Biomass Power
|
Common
Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(8)
|
Texas
/ Gas Gathering and Processing
|
Senior
Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/22/2018)
(3)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/23/2018)
(3)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (100 shares)
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.
(9)
|
North
Carolina / Contracting
|
Senior
Demand Note (15.00%, due 6/30/2009)
(10)
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Junior
Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series A (10 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (49 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
Alberta,
Canada / Production Services
|
Bridge
Loan (15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 12/31/2009)
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Note (15.00%, due 12/31/2009)
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (1,781 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG
Manufacturing, Inc.
|
Texas
/ Manufacturing
|
Senior
Secured Note (16.50%, due 8/31/2011)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (800 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
19,294
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
32,374
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V
Industries, Inc.
|
Pennsylvania
/ Manufacturing
|
Warrants
(200,000 warrants, expiring 6/30/2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (545,107 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
12,267
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.768
|
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.
(11)
|
Kentucky
/ Mining, Steel,
|
Senior
Secured Note (15.72%, in non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009, due
12/31/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
Iron
and Non- Precious Metals
|
Junior Secured Note
(15.72%, in non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009, due 12/31/2010)
(4)
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
and
Coal Production
|
Common
Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,890
|
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total
Control Investments
|
|
|
|
187,105
|
|
|
|
206,332
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate
Investments (5.00% to 24.99% voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian
Energy Holdings LLC
(12)
|
West
Virginia / Construction Services
|
Senior
Secured Debt – Tranche A (14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, due
1/31/2011)
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,891
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt – Tranche B (14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, past
due)
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series A (200 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series B (241 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock – Series C (500 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(6,065 warrants, expiring 2/13/2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(6,025 warrants, expiring 6/17/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Warrants
(25,000 warrants, expiring 11/30/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotronic
NeuroNetwork
(17)
|
Michigan
/ Healthcare
|
Senior
Secured Note (11.50% plus 1.00% PIK, due 2/21/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock (9,925 shares)
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,527
|
|
|
|
29,846
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Gilsonite Company
|
Utah
/ Specialty Minerals
|
Senior
Subordinated Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 3/14/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest Units in AGC/PEP, LLC (99.9999%)
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castro
Cheese Company, Inc.
|
Texas
/ Food Products
|
Junior
Secured Note (11.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 2/28/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest
Cherokee, LLC
(6)
|
Tennessee
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Senior
Secured Note (13.00% plus 4.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 4/01/2009, past due)
(4)
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Overriding
Royalty Interests
(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
7,420
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deb
Shops, Inc.
(17)
|
Pennsylvania
/ Retail
|
Second
Lien Debt (8.67%, due 10/23/2014)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondback
Operating, LP
|
Oklahoma
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Net
Profits Interest (15.00% payable on Equity distributions)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
Marine Services LLC
|
Louisiana
/ Shipping Vessels
|
Subordinated
Secured Note (12.00% plus 4.00% PIK, due 12/31/2011)
(3)
|
|
|
7,234
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net
Profits Interest (22.50% payable on Equity distributions)
(3),
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M
Oil & Gas, LLC
(3)
|
Texas
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Senior
Secured Note (13.00%, due 6/30/2010)
(3)
|
|
$
|
49,688
|
|
|
$
|
49,688
|
|
|
$
|
49,697
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net
Profits Interest (8.00% payable on Equity distributions)
(3),
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
51,379
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC
Systems LP ("IEC") /Advanced Rig Services LLC ("ARS")
|
Texas
/ Oilfield Fabrication
|
IEC
Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 11/20/2012)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,839
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
ARS
Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 11/20/2012)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,247
|
|
|
|
34,931
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick
Healthcare, LLC
|
Arizona
/ Healthcare
|
Second
Lien Debt (12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, due 4/30/2014)
(3)
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Common
Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,943
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller
Petroleum, Inc.
|
Tennessee
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Warrants,
Common Stock (1,935,523 warrants, expiring 5/04/2010 to 6/30/2014)
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peerless
Manufacturing
|
Texas
/ Manufacturing
|
Subordinated
Secured Note (11.50% plus 3.50% PIK, due 4/29/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitest
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(17)
|
Alabama
/ Pharmaceuticals
|
Second
Lien Debt (8.10%, due 4/30/2015)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional
Management Corp.
|
South
Carolina / Financial Services
|
Second
Lien Debt (12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 6/29/2012)
(3)
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resco
Products, Inc.
|
Pennsylvania
/ Manufacturing
|
Second
Lien Debt (8.67%, due 6/22/2014)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shearer's
Foods, Inc.
|
Ohio
/ Food Products
|
Second
Lien Debt (14.00%, due 10/31/2013)
(3)
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,360
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Membership
Interest Units in Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC (2,000 units)
(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
21,779
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker
Energy, LLC
|
Ohio
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Subordinated
Secured Revolving Credit Facility (12.00%, due 12/01/2011)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
29,554
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
Overriding
Royalty Interests
(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
32,472
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriZetto
Group
(17)
|
California
/ Healthcare
|
Subordinated
Unsecured Note (12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, due 10/01/2016)
(3)
|
|
|
15,205
|
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitek
(17)
|
Pennsylvania
/ Technical Services
|
Second
Lien Debt (13.08%, due 12/31/2013)
(3),
(4)
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind
River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
|
Utah
/ Oil & Gas Production
|
Senior
Secured Note (13.00% plus 3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 12/01/2008, due 7/31/2010)
(4)
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net
Profits Interest (5.00% payable on Equity distributions)
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
310,775
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Level 3 Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
531,424
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL
2 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds — Government Portfolio (Class
I)
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds — Government Portfolio (Class I)
(3)
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Total
Money Market Funds (Level 2 Investments)
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
|
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
%
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — (CONTINUED)
December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(in
thousands, except share data)
Endnote
Explanations for the Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009
|
|
(1)
|
The
securities in which Prospect Capital Corporation ("we", "us" or "our") has
invested were acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the "Securities Act."
These securities may be resold only in transactions that are exempt from
registration under the Securities Act.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Fair
value is determined by or under the direction of our Board of Directors.
As of December 31, 2009, two of our portfolio investments, Allied Defense
Group, Inc. and Dover Saddlery, Inc., were publically traded and
classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy established by
Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures ("ASC 820"). As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the
fair value of our remaining portfolio investments was determined using
significant unobservable inputs. ASC 820 classifies such inputs used to
measure fair value as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Our
investments in money market funds are classified as Level 2. See Note 3
and Note 4 within the accompanying consolidated financial statements for
further discussion.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Security,
or portion thereof, is held as collateral for the revolving credit
facility (see Note 10). The market values of these investments at December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 were $339,012 and $434,069, respectively; they
represent 50.5% and 67.2% of total investments at fair value,
respectively.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Floating
rate loan. Stated interest rate was in effect at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
(5)
|
There
are several entities involved in the Biomass investment. We own 100 shares
of common stock in Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. ("WEHI"), representing
100% of the issued and outstanding common stock. WEHI, in turn, owns 51
membership certificates in Biochips LLC ("Biochips"), which represents a
51% ownership stake.
|
|
|
|
We
own 282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc. ("WECO"),
which represents 51% of the issued and outstanding common stock. We own
directly 1,665 shares of common stock in Change Clean Energy Inc.
("CCEI"), f/k/a Worcester Energy Partners, Inc., which represents 51% of
the issued and outstanding common stock and the remaining 49% is owned by
WECO. CCEI owns 100 shares of common stock in Precision Logging and
Landclearing, Inc. ("Precision"), which represents 100% of the issued and
outstanding common stock.
|
|
|
|
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we created two new entities in
anticipation of the foreclosure proceedings against the co-borrowers
(WECO, CCEI and Biochips) Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. ("CCEHI") and
DownEast Power Company, LLC ("DEPC"). We own 1,000 shares of CCEHI,
representing 100% of the issued and outstanding stock, which in turn, owns
a 100% of the membership interests in DEPC.
|
|
|
|
On
March 11, 2009, we foreclosed on the assets formerly held by CCEI and
Biochips with a successful credit bid of $6,000 to acquire the assets. The
assets were subsequently assigned to DEPC. WECO, CCEI and Biochips are
joint borrowers on the term note issued to Prospect Capital. Effective
July 1, 2008, this loan was placed on non-accrual
status.
|
|
|
|
Biochips,
WECO, CCEI, Precision and WEHI currently have no material operations and
no significant assets. As of June 30, 2009, our Board of Directors
assessed a fair value of $0 for all of these equity positions and the loan
position. We determined that the impairment of both CCEI and CCEHI as of
June 30, 2009 was other than temporary and recorded a realized loss for
the amount that the amortized cost exceeds the fair value at June 30,
2009. Our Board of Directors set the value of the remaining CCEHI
investment at $1,976 and $2,530 as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009,
respectively.
|
|
|
(6)
|
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, we created two new entities,
Coalbed Inc. and Coalbed LLC, to foreclose on the outstanding senior
secured loan and assigned rights and interests of Conquest Cherokee, LLC
("Conquest"), as a result of the deterioration of Conquest's financial
performance and inability to service debt payments. We own 1,000 shares of
common stock in Coalbed Inc., representing 100% of the issued and
outstanding common stock. Coalbed Inc., in turn owns 100% of the
membership interest in Coalbed LLC.
|
|
|
|
On
October 21, 2009, Coalbed LLC foreclosed on the loan formerly made to
Conquest. As of December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors assessed a fair
value of $3,686 for the equity and the loan position in Coalbed
LLC.
|
|
|
(7)
|
In
addition to the stated returns, the net profits interest held will be
realized upon sale of the borrower or a sale of the
interests.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned investment of
us.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Entity
was formed as a result of the debt restructuring of ESA Environmental
Specialist, Inc. In early 2009, we foreclosed on the two loans on
non-accrual status and purchased the underlying personal and real
property. We own 1,000 shares of common stock in The Healing Staff
("THS"), f/k/a Lisamarie Fallon, Inc. representing 100% ownership. We own
1,500 shares of Vets Securing America, Inc. ("VSA"), representing 100%
ownership. VSA is a holding company for the real property of Integrated
Contract Services, Inc. ("ICS") purchased during the foreclosure
process.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Loan
is with THS an affiliate of ICS.
|
|
|
(11)
|
On
June 30, 2008, we consolidated our holdings in four coal companies into
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc. ("Yatesville"), and consolidated the
operations under one management team. As part of the transaction, the debt
that we held of C&A Construction, Inc. ("C&A"), Genesis Coal Corp.
("Genesis"), North Fork Collieries LLC ("North Fork") and Unity Virginia
Holdings LLC ("Unity") were exchanged for newly issued debt from
Yatesville, and our ownership interests in C&A, E&L Construction,
Inc. ("E&L"), Whymore Coal Company Inc. ("Whymore"), Genesis and North
Fork were exchanged for 100% of the equity of Yatesville. This
reorganization allows for a better utilization of the assets in the
consolidated group. Genesis Coal Corp. ("Genesis"), was not part of the
transaction.
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009 and at June 30, 2009, Yatesville owned 100% of the
membership interest of North Fork. In addition, Yatesville held a $9,325
and $8,062, respectively, note receivable from North Fork as of those two
respective dates.
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009 and at June 30, 2009, Yatesville owned 90% and 87%,
respectively, of the common stock of Genesis and held a note receivable of
$20,897 and $20,802, respectively, as of those two respective
dates.
|
|
|
|
Yatesville
held a note receivable of $4,261 from Unity at December 31, 2009 and at
June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
There
are several entities involved in Yatesville's investment in Whymore at
June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, Yatesville owned 10,000 shares of
common stock or 100% of the equity and held a $14,973 senior secured debt
receivable from C&A, which owns the equipment. Yatesville owned 10,000
shares of common stock or 100% of the equity of E&L, which leases the
equipment from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator
with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives revenues and
pays all operating expenses. Yatesville owned 4,900 shares of common stock
or 49% of the equity of Whymore, which applies for and holds permits on
behalf of E&L. Yatesville also owned 4,285 Series A convertible
preferred shares in each of C&A, E&L and Whymore. Whymore and
E&L are guarantors under the C&A credit agreement with
Yatesville.
|
|
|
|
In
August 2009, Yatesville sold its 49% ownership interest in the common
shares of Whymore to the 51% holder of the Whymore common shares ("Whymore
Purchaser"). All reclamation liability was transferred to the Whymore
Purchaser. In September 2009, Yatesville completed an auction for all of
its equipment.
|
|
|
|
Yatesville
currently has no material operations. As of December 31, 2009, our Board
of Directors determined that the impairment of Yatesville was other than
temporary and we recorded a realized loss for the amount that the
amortized cost exceeds the fair value. Our Board of Directors set the
value of the remaining Yatesville investment at $1,035 as of December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
(12)
|
There
are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC
("AEH") investment. We own warrants, the exercise of which will permit us
to purchase 37,090 Class A common units of AEH at a nominal cost and in
near-immediate fashion. We own 200 units of Series A preferred equity, 241
units of Series B preferred equity, and 500 units of Series C preferred
equity of AEH. The senior secured notes are with C&S Operating LLC and
East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by
AEH.
|
|
|
(13)
|
On
a fully diluted basis represents, 11.677% of voting common
shares.
|
|
|
(14)
|
Total
common shares outstanding of 19,310,956 as of December 9, 2009 from Miller
Petroleum, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 21, 2009
as applicable to our December 31, 2009 reporting date. Total common shares
outstanding of 15,811,856 as of March 11, 2009 from Miller's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 16, 2009.
|
|
|
(15)
|
A
portion of the positions listed were issued by an affiliate of the
portfolio company.
|
|
|
(16)
|
We
own 99.9999% of AGC/PEP, LLC. AGC/PEP, LLC owns 2,038 out of a total of
83,639 shares (including 4,932 vested an unvested management options) of
American Gilsonite Holding Company which owns 100% of American Gilsonite
Company.
|
|
|
(17)
|
Syndicated
investment which had been originated by another financial institution and
broadly distributed.
|
|
|
(18)
|
Mistral
Chip Holdings, LLC owns 44,800 shares out of 50,650 total shares
outstanding of Chip Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Shearer's Foods,
Inc., before adjusting for management options.
|
|
|
(19)
|
The
overriding royalty interests held receive payments at the stated rates
based upon operations of the borrower.
|
|
|
(20)
|
On
December 31, 2009, we sold our investment in Aylward Enterprises, LLC.
AWCNC, LLC is the remaining holding company with zero assets and our
remaining outstanding debt has no value of December 31,
2009
|
.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
References
herein to "we", "us" or "our" refer to Prospect Capital Corporation ("Prospect")
and its subsidiary unless the context specifically requires
otherwise.
We
were formerly known as Prospect Energy Corporation, a Maryland corporation. We
were organized on April 13, 2004 and were funded in an initial public offering
("IPO"), completed on July 27, 2004. We are a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a Business Development Company ("BDC"),
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). As a BDC, we have
qualified and have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company
("RIC"), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project financings,
recapitalizations, and other purposes.
On
May 15, 2007, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Prospect Capital Funding,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the purpose of holding certain of
our loan investments in the portfolio which are used as collateral for our
credit facility.
|
Note
2.
|
Patriot
Acquisition
|
On
December 2, 2009, we acquired the outstanding shares of Patriot Capital Funding,
Inc. ("Patriot") common stock for $201,083. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, Patriot common shareholders received 0.363992 shares of our common
stock for each share of Patriot common stock, resulting in 8,444,068 shares of
common stock being issued by us. In connection with the transaction, we repaid
all the outstanding borrowings of Patriot, in compliance with the merger
agreement.
On
December 2, 2009, Patriot made a final dividend payment equal to its
undistributed net ordinary income and capital gains of $0.38 per share. In
accordance with a recent IRS revenue procedure, the dividend was paid 10% in
cash and 90% in newly issued shares of Patriot's common stock. The exchange
ratio was adjusted to give effect to the final income distribution.
The
merger has been accounted for as an acquisition of Patriot by Prospect in
accordance with acquisition method of accounting as detailed in ASC 805,
Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). The fair value of the consideration paid was
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair
values as of the date of acquisition. As described in more detail in ASC 805,
goodwill, if any, would have been recognized as of the acquisition date, if the
consideration transferred exceeded the fair value of identifiable net assets
acquired. As of the acquisition date, the fair value of the identifiable net
assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the consideration transferred, and we
recognized the excess as a gain. A gain of $5,714 was recorded by Prospect in
the quarter ended December 31, 2009 related to the acquisition of Patriot. The
acquisition of Patriot was negotiated in July 2009 with the purchase agreement
being signed on August 3, 2009. Between July 2009 and December 2, 2009, our
valuation of certain of the investments acquired from Patriot increased due to
market improvement, which resulted in the recognition of the gain at
closing.
Preliminary
Purchase Price Allocation
The
purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair values as summarized in the following
table:
|
Cash
(to repay Patriot debt)
|
|
$
|
107,313
|
|
|
Cash
(to fund purchase of restricted stock from former Patriot
employees)
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
Common
stock issued
(1)
|
|
|
92,800
|
|
|
Total
purchase price
|
|
|
201,083
|
|
|
Assets
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
(2)
|
|
|
207,126
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
Assets
acquired
|
|
|
212,682
|
|
|
Other
liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
Net
assets acquired
|
|
|
206,797
|
|
|
Preliminary
gain on Patriot acquisition
(3)
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
value of the shares of common stock exchanged with the Patriot common
shareholders was based upon the closing price of our common stock on
December 2, 2009, the price immediately prior to the closing of the
transaction.
|
|
(2)
|
The
fair value of Patriot's investments were determined by the Board of
Directors in conjunction with an independent valuation agent. This
valuation resulted in a purchase price which was $98,150 below the
amortized cost of such investments. For those assets which are performing,
Prospect will record the accretion to par value in interest income over
the remaining term of the
investment.
|
|
(3)
|
The
preliminary gain has been determined based upon the estimated value of
certain liabilities which are not yet settled. Any changes to such
accruals will be recoded in future periods as an adjustment to such gain.
We do not believe such adjustments will be
material.
|
Preliminary
Condensed Statement of Net Assets Acquired
The
following condensed statement of net assets acquired reflects the preliminary
values assigned to Patriot's net assets as of the acquisition date, December 2,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
securities
|
|
$
|
207,126
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
212,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
Preliminary
fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
206,797
|
|
The
following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information does not
purport to be indicative of actual financial position or results of our
operations had the Patriot acquisition actually been consummated at the
beginning of each period presented. Certain one-time charges have been
eliminated. The pro forma adjustments reflecting the allocation of the purchase
price of Patriot and the gain of $5,714 recognized on the Patriot Acquisition
have been eliminated from all periods presented. Management expects to realize
net operating synergies from this transaction. The pro forma condensed combined
financial information does not reflect the potential impact of these synergies
and does not reflect any impact of additional accretion which would have been
recognized on the transaction, except for that which was recorded after the
transaction was consummated on December 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investment Income
|
|
$
|
30,730
|
|
|
$
|
32,384
|
|
|
$
|
60,298
|
|
|
$
|
78,412
|
|
|
Net
Investment Income
|
|
|
18,098
|
|
|
|
16,392
|
|
|
|
31,812
|
|
|
|
44,953
|
|
|
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from
Operations
|
|
|
(15,901
|
)
|
|
|
(11,944
|
)
|
|
|
(26,766
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations per
share
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
Note
3.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The
following are significant accounting policies consistently applied by
us:
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying interim financial statements, which are not audited, have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and pursuant
to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 6 and 10 of
Regulation S-X, as appropriate.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of GAAP financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses
during the reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial
markets, creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any other parameters
used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ, and
these differences could be material.
Basis
of Consolidation
Under
the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X and
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Audit and Accounting
Guide for Investment Companies, we are precluded from consolidating any entity
other than another investment company or an operating company which provides
substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our financial statements
include our accounts and the accounts of Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, our only
wholly-owned, closely-managed subsidiary that is also an investment company. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Investment
Classification
We
are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. We classify
our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control
investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a
controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is
generally deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has the
right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial ownership of 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and
affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed
to exist through the possession outright or via the right to acquire within 60
days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting
securities of another person.
Investments
are recognized when we assume an obligation to acquire a financial instrument
and assume the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument. Investments
are derecognized when we assume an obligation to sell a financial instrument and
forego the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument. Specifically,
we record all security transactions on a trade date basis. Investments in other,
non-security financial instruments are recorded on the basis of subscription
date or redemption date, as applicable. Amounts for investments recognized or
derecognized but not yet settled are reported as receivables for investments
sold and payables for investments purchased, respectively, in the Consolidated
Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Investment
Risks
The
Company's investments are subject to a variety of risks. Those risks include the
following:
Market
Risk
Market
risk represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the fair
value of the financial instrument.
Credit
Risk
Credit
risk represents the risk that the Partnership would incur if the counterparties
failed to perform pursuant to the terms of their agreements with the
Partnership.
Liquidity
Risk
Liquidity
risk represents the possibility that the Partnership may not be able to rapidly
adjust the size of its positions in times of high volatility and financial
stress at a reasonable price.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest
rate risk represents a change in interest rates, which could result in an
adverse change in the fair value of an interest-bearing financial
instrument.
Prepayment
Risk
Most
of the Company's debt investments allow for prepayment of principal without
penalty. Downward changes in interest rates may cause prepayments to occur at a
faster than expected rate, thereby effectively shortening the maturity of the
security and making the security less likely to be an income producing
instrument.
Investment
Valuation
Our
Board of Directors has established procedures for the valuation of our
investment portfolio. These procedures are detailed
below. Investments for which market quotations are readily available
are valued at such market quotations.
For
most of our investments, market quotations are not available. With respect to
investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such
market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of Directors
has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described
below:
|
(1)
|
Each
portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our investment
professionals with the independent valuation
firm;
|
|
(2)
|
the
independent valuation firm engaged by our Board of Directors conducts
independent appraisals and makes their own independent
assessment;
|
|
(3)
|
the
audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews and discusses the
preliminary valuation of our Investment Adviser and that of the
independent valuation firm; and
|
|
(4)
|
the
Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of
each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of our
Investment Adviser, the respective independent valuation firm and the
audit committee.
|
Investments
are valued utilizing a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches,
as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation
techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a
single present value amount (discounted) calculated based on an appropriate
discount rate. The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these
approaches, the types of factors that we may take into account in fair value
pricing our investments include, as relevant: available current market data,
including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables,
applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection
provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments, its earnings and
discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business,
comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, M&A
comparables, the principal market and enterprise values, among other
factors.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures
("ASC 820"). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. We adopted ASC 820 on a prospective basis beginning in the
quarter ended September 30, 2008.
ASC
820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following
hierarchy:
Level 1:
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible
by us at the measurement date.
Level 2:
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
In
all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to each investment.
The changes to GAAP from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of
fair value, framework for measuring fair value, and the expanded disclosures
about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to fair value measurements
already required or permitted by other standards. In accordance with ASC 820,
the fair value of our investments is defined as the price that we would receive
upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in
the principal or most advantageous market in which that investment is
transacted.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic 820-10-65,
Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly"
("ASC
820-10"). This update provides further clarification for ASC 820 in markets that
are not active and provides additional guidance for determining when the volume
of trading level of activity for an asset or liability has
significantly
decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. ASC 820-10-65 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10-65 for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009, did not have any effect on our net asset value,
financial position or results of operations as there was no change to the fair
value measurement principles set forth in ASC 820.
Valuation
of Other Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In
February 2007, FASB issued ASC Subtopic 820-10-05-1,
The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities
("ASC 820-10-05-1"). ASC 820-10-05-1
permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement
attribute for many of assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has
been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using another
measurement attribute. We adopted this statement on July 1, 2008 and have
elected not to value other assets and liabilities at fair value as would be
permitted by ASC 820-10-05-1.
Revenue
Recognition
Realized
gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific
identification method.
Interest
income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is
recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, closing and/or commitment fees
associated with investments in portfolio companies are accreted into interest
income over the respective terms of the applicable loans. Accretion of such
purchase discounts or premiums is calculated by the effective interest method as
of the purchase date and adjusted only for material amendments or prepayments.
Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and
unamortized loan origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income. The purchase discount for portfolio investments acquired from
Patriot was determined based on the difference between par value and fair market
value as of December 2, 2009, and will continue to accrete until maturity or
repayment of the respective loans.
Dividend
income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Structuring
fees and similar fees are recognized as income as earned, usually when paid.
Structuring fees, excess deal deposits, net profits interests and overriding
royalty interests are included in other income.
Loans
are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past
due 90 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest
will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed
on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be
recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management's
judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due
principal and interest is paid and in management's judgment, are likely to
remain current.
Federal
and State Income Taxes
We
have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company and intend to
continue to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(the "Code"), applicable to regulated investment companies. We are required to
distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend to
distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of our investment
company taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore, we have
made no provision for income taxes. The character of income and gains that we
will distribute is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to stockholder
dividends and distributions and other permanent book and tax differences are
reclassified to paid-in capital.
If
we do not distribute (or are not deemed to have distributed) at least 98% of our
annual taxable income in the calendar year it is earned, we will generally be
required to pay an excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our
annual taxable income exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for the
year. To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year annual
taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend
distributions from such taxable income, we accrue excise taxes, if any, on
estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned using an annual
effective excise tax rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by
dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual taxable
income.
We
adopted FASB ASC 740,
Income
Taxes
("ASC 740"). ASC 740 provides guidance for how uncertain tax
positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the
financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in the course of preparing our tax returns to determine
whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the
applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the
more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the
current year. Adoption of ASC 740 was applied to all open tax years as of July
1, 2007. The adoption of ASC 740 did not have an effect on our net asset value,
financial condition or results of operations as there was no liability for
unrecognized tax benefits and no change to our beginning net asset value. As of
December 31, 2009 and for the three and six months then ended, we did not have a
liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. Management's determinations
regarding ASC 740 may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based
upon factors including, but not limited to, an on-going analysis of tax laws,
regulations and interpretations thereof.
Dividends
and Distributions
Dividends
and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
The amount, if any, to be paid as a dividend or distribution is approved by our
Board of Directors each quarter and is generally based upon our management's
estimate of our earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Financing
Costs
We
record origination expenses related to our credit facility as deferred financing
costs. These expenses are deferred and amortized as part of interest expense
using the effective interest method over the stated life of the
facility.
We
record registration expenses related to shelf filings as prepaid assets. These
expenses consist principally of Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
registration fees, legal fees and accounting fees incurred. These prepaid assets
will be charged to capital upon the receipt of an equity offering proceeds or
charged to expense if no offering completed.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements
We
follow FASB ASC 460,
Guarantees
("ASC 460"). ASC
460 elaborates on the disclosure requirements of a guarantor in its interim and
annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that
it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, for those guarantees that are covered by ASC 460, the fair value of
the obligation undertaken in issuing certain guarantees. ASC 460 did not have a
material effect on the financial statements. Refer to Note 4, Note 8 and Note 11
for further discussion of guarantees and indemnification
agreements.
Per
Share Information
Net
increase or decrease in net assets resulting from operations per common share
are calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period presented. Diluted net increase or decrease in net assets
resulting from operations per share are not presented as there are no
potentially dilutive securities outstanding.
Subsequent
Events
In
May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855,
Subsequent Events
("ASC
855"). ASC 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. The standard, which includes a new
required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.
We evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 2009 up
through February 26, 2010, the date we issued the accompanying financial
statements. During this period, we did not have any material recognizable
subsequent events other than those disclosed in our financial
statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105,
Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles
("ASC 105"), which establishes the FASB Codification which
supersedes all existing accounting standard documents and will become the single
source of authoritative non-governmental U.S. GAAP. All other accounting
literature not included in the Codification will be considered
non-authoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP but reorganizes the
literature. ASC 105 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. We have conformed our financial statements and related Notes
to the new Codification for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860,
Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets — an amendment to FAS 140
("ASC 860"). ASC 860 improves
the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the
information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets: the effects of a transfer on its financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows: and a transferor's continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. ASC 860 is effective as of
the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual reporting period that
begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Our
management does not believe that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC 860
will have a significant effect on our financial statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R)
("ASC 810"). ASC 810 is intended to (1) address the effects on
certain provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as a result of the elimination of
the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in ASC 860, and (2) constituent
concerns about the application of certain key provisions of Interpretation
46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the
Interpretation do not always provided timely and useful information about an
enterprise's involvement in a variable interest entity. ASC 810 is effective as
of the beginning of our first annual reporting period that begins after November
15, 2009. Our management does not believe that the adoption of the amended
guidance in ASC 860 will have a significant effect on our financial
statements.
In
August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-05,
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,
to amend FASB Accounting Standards Codification ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures
("ASC 820"), to clarify how entities should estimate the
fair value of liabilities. ASC 820, as amended, includes clarifying guidance for
circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market is not available, the
effect of the existence of liability transfer restrictions, and the effect of
quoted prices for the identical liability, including when the identical
liability is traded as an asset. We adopted ASU 2009-05 effective October 1,
2009. The amended guidance in ASC 820 does not have a significant effect on our
financial statements for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12,
Measuring Fair Value of Certain
Investments
("ASU 2009-12"). This update provides further amendments to
ASC 820 to offer investors a practical expedient for measuring the fair value of
investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share.
Specifically, measurement using net asset value per share is reasonable for
investments within the scope of ASU 2009-12. We adopted ASU 2009-12
effective
October 1, 2009. The amended guidance in ASC 820 does not have a significant
effect on our financial statements for the quarter ended December 31,
2009.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements
("ASC 2010-06"). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820-10 and clarifies
and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and
non-recurring fair value measurements and employers' disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Our management does
not believe that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC 820-10 will have a
significant effect on our financial statements.
|
Note
4.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At
December 31, 2009, we had invested in 55 long-term portfolio investments, which
had an amortized cost of $633,636 and a fair value of $648,135. At June 30,
2009, we had invested in 30 long-term portfolio investments, which had an
amortized cost of $531,424 and a fair value of $547,168.
As
of December 31, 2009, we own controlling interests in Ajax Rolled Ring &
Machine ("Ajax"), AWCNC, LLC, C&J Cladding, LLC ("C&J"), Change Clean
Energy Holdings, Inc. ("CCEHI"), Coalbed, Inc./Coalbed, LLC (formerly Conquest
Cherokee, LLC) ("Coalbed"), Fischbein, LLC ("Fischbein"), Freedom Marine
Services LLC ("Freedom Marine"), Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. ("GSHI"),
Integrated Contract Services, Inc. ("ICS"), Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
("Iron Horse"), NRG Manufacturing, Inc. ("NRG"), Nupla Corporation ("Nupla"),
R-V Industries, Inc. ("R-V"), Sidump'r Trailer Company, Inc. ("Sidump'r") and
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc. ("Yatesville"). We also own an affiliated
interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC ("AEH"), Biotronic NeuroNetwork
("Biotronic"), Boxercraft Incorporated ("Boxercraft"), KTPS Holdings, LLC
("KTPS"), Miller Petroleum, Inc. ("Miller"), Smart, LLC ("Smart") and Sport
Helmets Holdings, LLC ("Sport Helmets").
The
fair values of our portfolio investments as of December 31, 2009 disaggregated
into the three levels of the ASC 820 valuation hierarchy are as
follows:
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Securities
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
Affiliate
investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
389,640
|
|
|
|
389,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
648,017
|
|
|
|
648,135
|
|
|
Investments
in money market funds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
Total
assets reported at fair value
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
23,418
|
|
|
$
|
648,017
|
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
The
aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments changed during the six months
ended December 31, 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using Unobservable Inputs (Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/
Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value as of June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
$
|
32,254
|
|
|
$
|
308,582
|
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
Total
realized losses
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
Change
in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
7,390
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(7,209
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
(1)
|
|
Assets
acquired in the Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
10,534
|
|
|
|
36,400
|
|
|
|
160,073
|
|
|
|
207,007
|
|
|
Purchases
of portfolio investments
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
7,321
|
|
|
Payment-in-kind
interest
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
Accretion
of original issue discount
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
6,670
|
|
|
Dispositions
of portfolio investments
|
|
|
(8,733
|
)
|
|
|
(2,516
|
)
|
|
|
(59,628
|
)
|
|
|
(70,877
|
)
|
|
Transfers
within Level 3
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
(17,832
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Transfers
in (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fair
value as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
$
|
66,479
|
|
|
$
|
389,640
|
|
|
$
|
648,017
|
|
|
(1)
|
Relates
to assets held at December 31,
2009.
|
As
of December 31, 2009, the valuation methodology for Ajax changed from a
discounted cash flow analysis to an enterprise and equity valuation. The
independent valuation agent proposed this adjustment due to our controlling
equity interest in Ajax. As a result, and combined with declining financial
results, the fair market value of Ajax decreased from $31,638 to $25,802 as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. There were no other material
changes to our valuation methodology.
At
December 31, 2009, nine loan investments were on non-accrual status: AEH,
Coalbed, Deb Shops, ICS, Iron Horse, Nupla, Sidump'r, Wind River Resources Corp.
and Wind River II Corp. ("Wind River"), and Yatesville. At June 30, 2009, five
loan investments were on non-accrual status: AEH, Coalbed, ICS, Wind River and
Yatesville. The loan principal of these loans amounted to $146,376 and $92,513
as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The fair values of
these investments represent approximately 5.7% and 7.3% of our net assets as of
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. For the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the income foregone as a result of not
accruing interest on non-accrual debt investments amounted to $8,052 and $2,528,
respectively. For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
the income foregone as a result of not accruing interest on non-accrual debt
investments amounted to $12,510 and $4,983, respectively. At December 31, 2009,
we held one asset on which payment of interest was past-due more than 90 days
for which we continue to accrue interest, H&M Oil and Gas, LLC. The
principal balance of this loan is $49,661 and the accrued interest receivable is
$2,744 at December 31, 2009. We expect full repayment of principal and interest
on this loan.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, we discontinued operations at
Yatesville. As of December 31, 2009, consistent with the decision to discontinue
operations, we determined that the impairment of Yatesville was
other-than-temporary and recorded a realized loss of $51,228 for the amount that
the amortized cost exceeded the fair market value. As of December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, Yatesville is valued at $1,035 and $13,097,
respectively.
GSHI
has indemnified us against any legal action arising from its investment in Gas
Solutions, LP. We have incurred approximately $2,093 from the inception of the
investment in GSHI through December 31, 2009 for fees associated with a legal
action, and GSHI has reimbursed us for the entire amount. Of the $2,093
reimbursement, $41 and $182 was reflected as dividend income: control
investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008, respectively. There were no such legal fees
incurred or reimbursed for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009.
Additionally, certain other expenses incurred by us which are attributable to
GSHI have been reimbursed by GSHI and are reflected as dividend income: control
investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, such reimbursements totaled as
$800 and $1,895, respectively. For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, such reimbursements totaled as $2,031and $3,515,
respectively.
The
original cost basis of debt placements and equity securities acquired (including
purchases of portfolio investments, follow-on investments and payment-in-kind
interest) totaled to approximately $210,438 and $13,564
during
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
These placements and acquisitions totaled to approximately $216,506 and $84,020
during the six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The $210,438 and $216,506 for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009, respectively, include $207,126 of portfolio investments
acquired from Patriot. Debt repayments and sales of equity securities with a
cost basis of approximately $45,494 and $2,112 were received during the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. These
repayments and sales amounted to $69,735 and $11,416 during the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
Note
5.
|
Other
Investment Income
|
Other
investment income consists of the gain on our acquisition of Patriot,
structuring and amendment fees, overriding royalty interests, settlement of net
profit interests, deal deposits, administrative agent fee, and other
miscellaneous and sundry cash receipts. Income from such sources for the three
and six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
For
The Three Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
For
The Six Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on Patriot acquisition
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Structuring
and amendment fees
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
Overriding
royalty interests
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
Settlement
of net profits interests
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
Other
Investment Income
|
|
$
|
6,174
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
6,638
|
|
|
$
|
13,827
|
|
|
Note
6.
|
Equity
Offerings and Related Expenses
|
We
issued 11,437,797 shares of our common stock in public and private offerings
during the six months ended December, 2009. We did not issue any common stock
during the six months ended December 31, 2008. The proceeds raised, the related
underwriting fees, the offering expenses and the prices at which these shares
were issued are as follows:
Issuances
of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
7, 2009
|
|
|
5,175,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.000
|
|
|
$
|
46,575
|
|
|
$
|
2,329
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August
20, 2009
(1)
|
|
|
3,449,686
|
|
|
$
|
8.500
|
|
|
$
|
29,322
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
24, 2009
(1)
|
|
|
2,807,111
|
|
|
$
|
9.000
|
|
|
$
|
25,264
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
840
|
|
|
(1)
|
Concurrent
with the sale of these shares, we entered into a registration rights
agreement in which we granted the purchasers certain registration rights
with respect to the shares. We have filed with the SEC a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement on Form N-2 which has been
declared effective by the SEC.
|
Our
shareholders' equity accounts at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 reflect
cumulative shares issued as of those respective dates. Our common stock has been
issued through public offerings, a registered direct offering, private
offerings, the exercise of over-allotment options on the part of the
underwriters, our dividend reinvestment plan and business combinations. When our
common stock is issued, the related offering expenses have been charged against
paid-in capital in excess of par. All underwriting fees and offering expenses
were borne by us.
On
December 2, 2009, we issued 8,444,068 shares of common stock to acquire Patriot.
This transaction is described in further detail in Note 2.
On
July 20, 2009 and October 19, 2009, we issued shares of our common stock in
connection with the dividend reinvestment plan of 297,274 and 233,523,
respectively.
On
October 9, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase plan under
which we may repurchase up to $20,000 of our common stock at prices below our
net asset value as reported in our financial statements published for the year
ended June 30, 2008. We have not made any purchases of our common stock during
the period from October 9, 2008 to December 31, 2009 pursuant to this
plan.
|
Note
7.
|
Net
Decrease (Increase) in Net Assets per Common
Share
|
The
following information sets forth the computation of net (decrease) increase in
net assets resulting from operations per common share for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
For
The Three Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
For
The Six Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
$
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
57,613,489
|
|
|
|
29,618,762
|
|
|
|
53,709,197
|
|
|
|
29,569,571
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common
share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
Note
8.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
We
have entered into an investment advisory and management agreement with Prospect
Capital Management (the "Investment Advisory Agreement") under which the
Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of our Board of
Directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment
advisory services to us. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement,
our Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our portfolio, the
nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing
such changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the
investments we make (including performing due diligence on our prospective
portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and monitors investments we
make.
Prospect
Capital Management's services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not
exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long
as its services to us are not impaired. For providing these services the
Investment Adviser receives a fee from us, consisting of two components: a base
management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an
annual rate of 2.00% on our gross assets (including amounts borrowed). For
services currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base
management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is
calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the end of the two
most recently completed calendar quarters and appropriately adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
The
total base management fees incurred to the favor of the Investment Adviser for
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $3,176, and
$2,940, respectively. The fees incurred for the six months ended December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 were $6,385, and $5,763, respectively.
The
incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income incentive fee, is
calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our pre-incentive fee net
investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this
purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend
income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for
providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees and other fees that we receive from portfolio
companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating expenses for
the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the
Administration Agreement described below, and any interest expense and dividends
paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of
investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount,
debt instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon securities),
accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net
investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital
losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net
investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets
at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
"hurdle rate" of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
The
net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also
included in the amount of the gross assets used to calculate the 2.00% base
management fee. We pay the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows:
|
|
·
|
no
incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net
investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate;
|
|
|
·
|
100.00%
of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that
portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that
exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized
hurdle rate); and
|
|
|
·
|
20.00%
of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that
exceeds 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle
rate).
|
These
calculations are appropriately prorated for any period of less than three months
and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current
quarter.
The
second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, is determined
and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination
of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of our realized capital gains for the calendar year, if any, computed net
of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of
such year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to the
Investment Adviser, we calculate the aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate
realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as
applicable, with respect to each investment that has been in its portfolio. For
the purpose of this calculation, an "investment" is defined as the total of all
rights and claims which maybe asserted against a portfolio company arising from
our participation in the debt, equity, and other financial instruments issued by
that company. Aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the
differences between the aggregate net sales price of each investment and the
aggregate cost basis of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed.
Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the
aggregate net sales price of each investment is less than the aggregate cost
basis of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation equals the sum of the differences, if negative, between the
aggregate valuation of each investment and the aggregate cost basis of such
investment as of the applicable calendar year-end . At the end of the applicable
calendar year, the amount of capital gains that serves as the basis for our
calculation of the capital gains incentive fee involves netting aggregate
realized capital gains against aggregate realized capital losses on a
since-inception basis and then reducing this amount by the aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation. If this number is positive, then the capital gains
incentive fee payable is equal to 20.00% of such amount, less the aggregate
amount of any capital gains incentive fees paid since inception.
For
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, income incentive
fees of $4,231 and $2,990, respectively, were incurred. For the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, income incentive fees of $7,311 and
$8,865, respectively, were incurred. No capital gains incentive fees were
incurred for the three or six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
Administration
Agreement
We
have also entered into an Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration,
LLC ("Prospect Administration") under which Prospect Administration, among other
things, provides (or arranges for the provision of) administrative services and
facilities for us. For providing these services, we reimburse Prospect
Administration for our allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance
officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs. For the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the reimbursement was approximately
$840 and $588, respectively. For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, the reimbursement was approximately $1,680 and $1,176, respectively. Under
this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with office facilities,
equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such
facilities. Prospect Administration also performs, or oversees the performance
of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things,
being responsible for the financial records that we are required to maintain and
preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In
addition, Prospect Administration assists us in determining and publishing our
net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and
the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally
oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and
professional services rendered to us by others. Under the Administration
Agreement, Prospect Administration also provides on our behalf managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such
assistance. The Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon 60 days' written notice to the other party. Prospect
Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our Investment
Adviser.
The
Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless
disregard of its duties and obligations, Prospect Administration and its
officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members
and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administration's services under the
Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for us.
Prospect
Administration, pursuant to the approval of our Board of Directors, engaged
Vastardis Fund Services LLC ("Vastardis") to serve as our sub-administrator to
perform certain services required of Prospect Administration. Under the
sub-administration agreement, Vastardis provided us with office facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities.
Vastardis also conducted relations with custodians, depositories, transfer
agents, dividend disbursing agents, other stockholder servicing agents,
accountants, attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers, corporate
fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in any such other capacity
deemed to be necessary or desirable. Vastardis provided reports to the
Administrator and the Directors of its performance of obligations and furnished
advice and recommendations with respect to such other aspects of our business
and affairs as it shall determine to be desirable. Under the sub-administration
agreement, Vastardis also provided the service of William E. Vastardis as our
Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). We compensated Vastardis for providing us these
services by the payment of an asset-based fee with a $400 annual minimum,
payable monthly. Our service agreement was amended on September 28, 2008 so that
Mr. Vastardis no longer served as our CFO effective as of November 11, 2008. At
that time, Brian H. Oswald, a managing director at Prospect Administration,
assumed the role of CFO.
We
terminated our agreement with Vastardis to provide sub-administration services
effective June 30, 2009. We entered into a new consulting services agreement for
the period from July 1, 2009 until the filing of our Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2009. We paid Vastardis a total of $30 for services rendered in
conjunction with
preparation
of Form 10-K under the new agreement. All services previously provided by
Vastardis were assumed by Prospect Administration beginning on July 1, 2009 for
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 and thereafter.
Managerial
Assistance
As
a business development company, we offer, and must provide upon request,
managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. This assistance
could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our portfolio
companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and
advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and
financial guidance. We billed $260 and $215 of managerial assistance fees for
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, of
which $135 and $60 remains on the consolidated statement of assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively. We billed
$461 and $431 of managerial assistance fees for the six months ended December
31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. These fees are paid to the
Administrator when received. We simultaneously accrue a payable to the
Administrator for the same amounts, which remain on the consolidated statements
of assets and liabilities.
|
Note
9.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
For
The Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Share Data
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
Net
investment income
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
Net
realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
Net
unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
Net
decrease in net assets as a result of public offerings and DRIP
issuance
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets as a result of shares issued for Patriot
acquisition
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Dividends
declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
(1.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
Net
asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
11.81
|
|
|
$
|
11.97
|
|
|
$
|
11.81
|
|
|
$
|
11.97
|
|
|
Total
return based on market value
(2)
|
|
|
14.09
|
%
|
|
|
(3.41
|
%)
|
|
|
37.87
|
%
|
|
|
(3.17
|
%)
|
|
Total
return based on net asset value
(2)
|
|
|
(6.32
|
%)
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
|
|
(12.87
|
%)
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
Shares
outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
29,637,928
|
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
29,637,928
|
|
|
Average
weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
57,613,489
|
|
|
|
29,618,762
|
|
|
|
53,709,197
|
|
|
|
29,569,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio
/ Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
assets at end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
Annualized
ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
7.65
|
%
|
|
|
9.34
|
%
|
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
|
Annualized
ratio of net operating income to average net assets
|
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
|
|
11.33
|
%
|
|
|
9.77
|
%
|
|
|
16.86
|
%
|
Note
9: Financial Highlights (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Share Data
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
Costs
related to the initial public offering
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
Costs
related to the secondary public offering
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
investment income
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
Realized
(loss) gain
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets as a result of public
offering
|
|
|
(2.11
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
Dividends
declared and paid
|
|
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
Net
asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
|
Total
return based on market value
(2)
|
|
|
(22.04
|
%)
|
|
|
(15.90
|
%)
|
|
|
12.65
|
%
|
|
|
44.90
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
%)
|
|
Total
return based on net asset value
(2)
|
|
|
(4.81
|
%)
|
|
|
7.84
|
%
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
Shares
outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
Average
weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
Ratio
/ Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
Annualized
ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
9.03
|
%
|
|
|
9.62
|
%
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
|
Annualized
ratio of net investment income to average net assets
|
|
|
13.14
|
%
|
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
|
9.71
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Financial
highlights are based on weighted average
shares.
|
|
(2)
|
Total
return based on market value is based on the change in market price per
share between the opening and ending market prices per share in each
period and assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with our
dividend reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is based
upon the change in net asset value per share between the opening and
ending net asset values per share in each period and assumes that
dividends are reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment
plan.
|
|
Note
10.
|
Revolving
Credit Agreements
|
On
June 6, 2007, we closed on a $200,000 three-year revolving credit facility (as
amended on December 31, 2007) with Rabobank Nederland ("Rabobank") as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger (the "Rabobank Facility"). Until
November 14, 2008, interest on the Rabobank Facility was charged at LIBOR plus
175 basis points; thereafter, under the terms of a commitment letter with
Rabobank to arrange and structure a new rated credit facility, we agreed to an
immediate increase in the current borrowing rate on the Rabobank Facility to
LIBOR plus 250 basis points. Additionally, Rabobank charged a fee on the unused
portion of the facility. This fee is assessed at the rate of 37.5 basis points
per annum of the amount of that unused portion.
On
June 25, 2009, we completed a first closing on an expanded $250,000 revolving
credit facility (the "Syndicated Facility"). The new Syndicated Facility, which
had $195,000 and $175,000 total commitments as of December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009, respectively, includes an accordion feature which allows the Syndicated
Facility to accept up to an aggregate total of $250,000 of commitments for which
we continue to solicit additional commitments from other lenders for the
additional $55,000 as of December 31, 2009. The revolving period extends through
June 24, 2010. If not renewed or extended by the participant banks, a one year
amortization period would commence whereby we may not borrow additional funds.
Thereafter for ten years, all principal, interest and fee payments received in
conjunction with collateral pledged to the Syndicated Facility, less a monthly
servicing fee payable to us, are required to be used to repay outstanding
borrowings under the Syndicated Facility. Any remaining outstanding borrowings
would be due and payable on the commitment termination date, which is currently
June 24, 2011.
The
Syndicated Facility contains restrictions pertaining to the geographic and
industry concentrations of funded loans, maximum size of funded loans, interest
rate payment frequency of funded loans, maturity dates of funded loans and
minimum equity requirements. The Syndicated Facility also contains certain
requirements relating to portfolio performance, including required minimum
portfolio yield and limitations on delinquencies and charge-offs, violation of
which could result in the early termination of the Syndicated Facility. The
Syndicated Facility also requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity
requirement. At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with
the applicable covenants.
Interest
on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month LIBOR plus 400 basis
points, subject to a minimum Libor floor of 200 basis points. Additionally, the
banks charge a fee on the unused portion of the credit facility equal to 100
basis points. As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we had $10,000 and
$124,800 outstanding under our credit facility, respectively. As of December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009, $62,914 and $946 was available to us for additional
borrowing under our credit facility, respectively. As we make additional
investments which are eligible to be pledged under the credit facility, we will
generate additional availability to the extent such investments are eligible to
be placed into the borrowing base. At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the
investments used as collateral for the Syndicated Facility had an aggregate
market value of $339,012 and $434,069, which represents 53.2% and 81.5% of net
assets, respectively.
In
connection with the origination and amendment of the Syndicated Facility, we
incurred approximately $9,472 of fees which are being amortized over the term of
the facility.
|
Note
11.
|
Commitments
and Off-Balance Sheet Risks
|
From
time to time, we provide guarantees for portfolio companies for payments to
counterparties, usually as an alternative to investing additional capital. We
provide indemnifications to Prospect Administration in accordance with our
respective agreements with that service provider. These indemnifications are
described in further detail in Note 8. As of December 31, 2009, no other
material contingency agreements exist.
From
time to time, we may become involved in various investigations, claims and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These matters may
relate to intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or other
matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise will be subject to
various uncertainties and, even if such claims are without merit, could result
in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial
resources.
On
December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, L.P. ("DGP") served us with a complaint
filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division. DGP alleges that DGP was defrauded and that we breached our
fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with DGP's contract to purchase
Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection
with our alleged agreement in September 2004 to loan DGP funds with which DGP
intended to buy Gas Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint
sought relief not limited to $100,000. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate
Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Texas, Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant our
Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006,
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Galveston Division issued an order granting our Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP, against us. On May 16, 2007, the
Court also granted us summary judgment on DGP's liability to us on our
counterclaim for DGP's breach of a release and covenant not to sue. On January
4, 2008, the Court, Judge Melinda Harmon presiding, granted our motion to
dismiss all DGP's claims asserted against certain of our officers and
affiliates. On August 20, 2008, Judge Harmon entered a Final Judgment dismissing
all of DGP's claims. DGP appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, which affirmed the Final Judgment on June 24, 2009. DGP then moved for
rehearing on July 8, 2009, which the Fifth Circuit denied on August 6, 2009. Our
damage claims against DGP remain pending.
In
May 2006, based in part on unfavorable due diligence and the absence of
investment committee approval, we declined to extend a loan for $10,000 to a
potential borrower ("plaintiff"). Plaintiff was subsequently sued by its own
attorney in a local Texas court for plaintiff's failure to pay fees owed to its
attorney. In December 2006, plaintiff filed a cross-action against us and
certain affiliates (the "defendants") in the same local Texas court, alleging,
among other things, tortuous interference with contract and fraud. We petitioned
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the
"District Court") to compel arbitration and to enjoin the Texas action. In
February 2007, our motions were granted. Plaintiff appealed that decision. On
July 24, 2008, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the
District Court. The arbitration commenced in July 2007 and concluded in late
November 2007. Post-hearing briefings were completed in February 2008. On April
14, 2008, the arbitrator rendered an award in our favor, rejecting all of
plaintiff's claims. On April 18, 2008, we filed a petition before the District
Court to confirm the award. On October 8, 2008, the District Court granted the
Company's petition to confirm the award, confirmed the awards and subsequently
entered judgment thereon in favor of the Company in the amount of $2,288. After
filing a defective notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit on November 5, 2008, plaintiff's counsel resubmitted a new
notice of appeal on January 9, 2009. The plaintiff subsequently requested that
the Company agree to stipulate to the withdrawal of plaintiff's appeal to the
Second Circuit. Such a stipulation was filed with the Second Circuit on or about
April 14, 2009. Based on this
stipulation,
the Second Circuit issued a mandate terminating the appeal, which was
transmitted to the District Court on April 23, 2009. Post-judgment discovery
against plaintiff is continuing and we have filed a motion for sanctions against
plaintiff's counsel. Argument for the motion for sanctions was held on November
19, 2009 and a decision from the court is pending.
|
Note
13.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Realized and Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)
|
|
|
Net
Increase (Decrease)
in
Net Assets from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2006
|
|
$
|
6,432
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
3,274
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
3,964
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
March
31, 2007
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
June
30, 2007
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2007
|
|
|
15,391
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
10,660
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
12,919
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
23,448
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
23,986
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2008
(2)
|
|
|
35,799
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
(9,504
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
11,960
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
6,524
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
20,669
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
15,331
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
June
30, 2009
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
11,981
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
(12,730
|
)
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
21,517
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(18,696
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
(6,378
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
28,883
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
16,925
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
(33,778
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
(1)
|
Per
share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares during
period.
|
|
(2)
|
Additional
income for this quarter was driven by other investment income from the
settlement of net profits interests on IEC Systems LP and Advanced Rig
Services LLC.
|
|
Note
14.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On
January 25, 2010, we issued 236,985 shares of our common stock in connection
with the dividend reinvestment plan.
On
January 4, 2010, we completed a closing for an additional $15,000 commitment to
the Syndicated Facility, increasing total commitments to $210,000.
Merger
Discussions with Allied Capital Corporation
On
January 14, 2010, Prospect Capital delivered a proposal letter to the Allied
Capital Board (the "First Prospect Capital Merger Offer Letter") containing an
offer to acquire each outstanding Allied Capital Corporation ("Allied Capital")
Share in exchange for 0.385 of a share of Prospect Capital Common Stock (the
"First Prospect Capital Merger Offer").
On
January 19, 2010, Allied Capital filed a Form 8-K stating that the Allied
Capital Board determined that the First Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not
constitute a "Superior Proposal" as such term is defined in the Ares Capital
Merger Agreement.
On
January 20, 2010, Prospect Capital issued a press release containing a copy of a
letter it subsequently sent to the Allied Capital Board in connection with the
First Prospect Capital Merger Offer.
On
January 26, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it delivered another letter to
the Allied Capital Board, raising its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the
"Second Prospect Capital Merger Offer Letter").
On
February 3, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed a Form 8-K stating that
the Allied Capital Board determined that the Second Prospect Capital Merger
Offer did not constitute a "Superior Proposal" as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement.
On
February 9, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it delivered another letter to
the Allied Capital Board, raising its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the
"Third Prospect Capital Merger Offer Letter")
.
On February 11, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed a
Form 8-K stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the Third
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a "Superior Proposal" as such
term is defined in the Ares Capital Merger Agreement. Prospect Capital has
filed proxy material to solicit Allied Shareholders to vote against Allied's
proposed merger with Ares Capital Corporation.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Prospect
Capital Corporation
New
York, New York
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities
of Prospect Capital Corporation, including the schedule of investments, as of
June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended June 30, 2009, and the financial highlights for each of the periods
presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit
also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and financial highlights
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Prospect Capital Corporation at June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended June 30, 2009, and the financial highlights for each of the periods
presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Prospect Capital Corporation's
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report
dated September 11, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/
BDO Seidman, LLP
New
York, New York
September
11, 2009
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
(NOTE 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
at fair value (net cost of $531,424 and $496,805, respectively,
Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments (net cost of $187,105 and $203,661,
respectively)
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
$
|
205,827
|
|
|
Affiliate
investments (net cost of $33,544 and $5,609, respectively)
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments (net cost of $310,775 and
$287,535,respectively)
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
285,660
|
|
|
Total
investments at fair value
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
497,530
|
|
|
Investments
in money market funds
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
Receivables
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest,
net
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
Loan
principal
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
Deferred
financing costs
|
|
|
6,951
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
667,025
|
|
|
|
541,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
facility payable (Note 10)
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
|
91,167
|
|
|
Dividends
payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
|
Due
to Prospect Administration (Note 7)
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
Due
to Prospect Capital Management (Note 7)
|
|
|
5,871
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
134,429
|
|
|
|
112,155
|
|
|
Net
Assets
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
Components
of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (100,000,000 and 100,000,000 common
shares authorized, respectively; 42,943,084 and 29,520,379 issued and
outstanding, respectively) (Note 5)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
Paid-in
capital in excess of par
|
|
|
545,707
|
|
|
|
441,332
|
|
|
Undistributed
net investment income
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
Accumulated
realized losses on investments
|
|
|
(53,050
|
)
|
|
|
(13,972
|
)
|
|
Unrealized
appreciation on investments
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
Net
Assets
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per
Share
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
June 30,
2008
|
|
|
June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Investment
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $166, $230, and $178,
respectively)
|
|
$
|
19,281
|
|
|
$
|
21,709
|
|
|
$
|
13,500
|
|
|
Affiliate
investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $ — , $70, and $237,
respectively)
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
40,606
|
|
|
|
35,466
|
|
|
|
13,095
|
|
|
Total
interest income
|
|
|
62,926
|
|
|
|
59,033
|
|
|
|
30,084
|
|
|
Dividend
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments
|
|
|
22,468
|
|
|
|
11,327
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
Money
market funds
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
Total
dividend income
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
|
|
12,033
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
Other
income: (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control/affiliate
investments
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
13,513
|
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
Total
other income
|
|
|
14,762
|
|
|
|
8,336
|
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
Total Investment
Income
|
|
|
100,481
|
|
|
|
79,402
|
|
|
|
40,681
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
management fee (Note 7)
|
|
|
11,915
|
|
|
|
8,921
|
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
|
Income
incentive fee (Note 7)
|
|
|
14,790
|
|
|
|
11,278
|
|
|
|
5,781
|
|
|
Total
investment advisory fees
|
|
|
26,705
|
|
|
|
20,199
|
|
|
|
11,226
|
|
|
Interest
and credit facility expenses
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
6,318
|
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
Sub-administration
fees (including former Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance
Officer)
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
Legal
fees
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
Valuation
services
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
Audit,
compliance and tax related fees
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
Allocation
of overhead from Prospect Administration (Note 7)
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
Insurance
expense
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
Directors'
fees
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
Other
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
Excise
taxes
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
41,318
|
|
|
|
34,289
|
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
|
Net
Investment Income
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
45,113
|
|
|
|
23,131
|
|
|
Net
realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(39,078
|
)
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
Net
change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
Net
Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations per share: (Note 6
and Note 8)
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding:
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
Increase
in Net Assets from Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment income
|
|
$
|
59,163
|
|
|
$
|
45,113
|
|
|
$
|
23,131
|
|
|
Net
realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(39,078
|
)
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
Net
change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
Net Increase in Net
Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
|
35,104
|
|
|
|
27,591
|
|
|
|
16,728
|
|
|
Dividends to
Shareholders
|
|
|
(36,519
|
)
|
|
|
(39,513
|
)
|
|
|
(27,542
|
)
|
|
Capital
Share Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from capital shares sold
|
|
|
100,304
|
|
|
|
140,249
|
|
|
|
197,558
|
|
|
Less:
Offering costs of public share offerings
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
Reinvestment
of dividends
|
|
|
5,107
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net
Assets Resulting from Capital ShareTransactions
|
|
|
104,388
|
|
|
|
141,497
|
|
|
|
202,592
|
|
|
Total Increase in Net
Assets:
|
|
|
102,973
|
|
|
|
129,575
|
|
|
|
191,778
|
|
|
Net
assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
429,623
|
|
|
|
300,048
|
|
|
|
108,270
|
|
|
Net Assets at End
of Year
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
Capital
Share Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
sold
|
|
|
12,942,500
|
|
|
|
9,400,000
|
|
|
|
12,526,650
|
|
|
Shares
issued through reinvestment of dividends
|
|
|
480,205
|
|
|
|
171,314
|
|
|
|
352,542
|
|
|
Net
increase in capital share activity
|
|
|
13,422,705
|
|
|
|
9,571,314
|
|
|
|
12,879,192
|
|
|
Shares
outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding
at End of Year
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
Net
realized loss (gain) on investments
|
|
|
39,078
|
|
|
|
16,239
|
|
|
|
(1,947
|
)
|
|
Net
change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on
investments
|
|
|
(15,019
|
)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
Accretion
of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(2,399
|
)
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
Change
in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
for purchases of investments
|
|
|
(98,305
|
)
|
|
|
(311,947
|
)
|
|
|
(167,255
|
)
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of investments and collection of investment
principal
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
127,212
|
|
|
|
38,407
|
|
|
Purchases
of cash equivalents
|
|
|
(39,999
|
)
|
|
|
(274,949
|
)
|
|
|
(259,887
|
)
|
|
Sales
of cash equivalents
|
|
|
39,999
|
|
|
|
274,932
|
|
|
|
259,885
|
|
|
Net
(increase) decrease investments in money market funds
|
|
|
(65,735
|
)
|
|
|
8,760
|
|
|
|
(40,152
|
)
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in interest receivable, net
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in dividends receivable
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
|
|
(3,985
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in loan principal receivable
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
Decrease
in receivable for securities sold
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
Decrease
in receivable for structuring fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Decrease
in due from Prospect Administration
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Decrease
in due from Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Increase
in other receivables
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
(Decrease)
increase in payables for securities purchased
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Increase
in due to Prospect Administration
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
(Decrease)
increase in due to Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
(Decrease)
increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
(74,000
|
)
|
|
|
(204,025
|
)
|
|
|
(143,890
|
)
|
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
under credit facility
|
|
|
100,157
|
|
|
|
238,492
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Payments
under credit facility
|
|
|
(66,524
|
)
|
|
|
(147,325
|
)
|
|
|
(28,500
|
)
|
|
Financing
costs paid and deferred
|
|
|
(6,270
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
100,304
|
|
|
|
140,249
|
|
|
|
197,558
|
|
|
Offering
costs from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
Dividends
paid
|
|
|
(43,257
|
)
|
|
|
(24,915
|
)
|
|
|
(21,634
|
)
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
83,387
|
|
|
|
204,580
|
|
|
|
143,890
|
|
|
Total Increase in
Cash
|
|
|
9,387
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cash
balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cash Balance at End of
Year
|
|
$
|
9,942
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Cash Paid For
Interest
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,942
|
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing
Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
of shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
5,107
|
|
|
$
|
2,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,908
|
|
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June
30, 2009 and June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
Value/
Shares/
Ownership
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Control
Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine
|
South
Carolina/ Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
common shares (7 total unrestricted common shares issued and outstanding
and 681.85 restricted common shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series A
convertible preferred shares (7,192.6 total preferred shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
6,142.6
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
secured note — Tranche B,11.50% plus 6.00% PIK,
4/01/2013(3),(4)
|
|
|
$
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note — Tranche A, 10.50%,
4/01/2013(3),(5)
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,219
|
|
|
|
31,638
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
C&J
Cladding LLC
|
Texas/Metal
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant,
common units, expiring 3/30/2014 (1,000 total company units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 14.00%, 3/30/2012(3),(6)
|
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
Change
Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. ("CCEHI")(7)
|
Maine/Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCEHI
common shares (1,000 total common shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.(3),(8)
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
Junior
secured note, 18.00%, 12/23/2018
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 18.00%, 12/22/2018
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.(9)
|
North
Carolina/ Contracting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series A
preferred shares (10 total Series A preferred shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Junior
secured note, stated rate 7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past
due
|
|
|
$
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, stated rate 7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past
due
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Senior
demand note, 15.00%, 6/30/2009(10)
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
Alberta,
Canada/ Production Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (2,231 total class A common shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 15.00%, 12/31/2009
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Bridge
loan, 15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 12/31/2009
|
|
|
$
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
NRG
Manufacturing, Inc.
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (1,000 total common shares issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
19,294
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 16.50%, 8/31/2011(3),(11)
|
|
|
$
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
32,374
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
R-V
Industries, Inc.
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (750,000 total common shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
545,107
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
12,267
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
Warrants,
common shares, expiring 6/30/2017 (200,000 total common shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,768
|
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.(12)
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock (1,000 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Junior
secured note, 15.72%, in non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009, matures
12/31/2010
|
|
|
$
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 15.72%, in non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009, matures
12/31/2010
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,890
|
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Total Control
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,105
|
|
|
|
206,332
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
Affiliate
Investments (5.00% to 24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian
Energy Holdings LLC(13)
|
West
Virginia/ Construction Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants —
Class A common units, expiring 2/13/2016 (86,843 total fully-diluted
class A common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Warrants —
Class A common units, expiring 6/17/2018 (86,843 total fully-diluted
class A common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Warrants —
Class A common units, expiring 11/30/2018 (86,843 total fully-diluted
class A common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series A
preferred equity (1,075 total series A preferred equity units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series B
preferred equity (794 total series B preferred equity units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series C
preferred equity (500 total series C preferred equity units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt Tranche B, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest, non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, past
due
|
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt Tranche A, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default
interest, non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, matures
1/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Biotronic
Neuro Network
|
Michigan/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
shares (85,000 total preferred shares outstanding)(14)
|
|
|
|
9,925.455
|
|
|
$
|
2,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 11.50% plus 1.00% PIK, 2/21/2013(3),(15)
|
|
|
$
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,527
|
|
|
|
29,846
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
Total Affiliate
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Gilsonite Company
|
Utah/Specialty
Minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership
interest units in AGC PEP, LLC(16)
|
|
|
|
99.9999
|
%
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Senior
subordinated note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 3/14/2013(3)
|
|
|
$
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
Castro
Cheese Company, Inc.(3)
|
Texas/Food
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior
secured note, 11.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 2/28/2013
|
|
|
$
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Conquest
Cherokee, LLC(17)
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding
Royalty Interests
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 13.00%, in non-accrual status effective 4/01/2009 plus 4.00%
default interest, past due(18)
|
|
|
$
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
7,420
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Deb
Shops, Inc.(19)
|
Pennsylvania/
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 8.67%, 10/23/2014
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,623
|
|
|
$
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
Diamondback
Operating, LP
|
Oklahoma/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
profits interest, 15.00% payable on equity
distributions(20)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Freedom
Marine Services LLC(3),(21)
|
Louisiana/
Shipping Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
profits interest, 22.50% payable on equity distributions
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
secured note, 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK, 12/31/2011(22)
|
|
|
$
|
7,234
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
H&M
Oil & Gas, LLC(3),(21)
|
Texas/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
profits interest, 8.00% payable on equity distributions
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 13.00%, 6/30/2010(23)
|
|
|
$
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
49,697
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
51,379
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
IEC
Systems LP ("IEC") /Advanced Rig Services LLC
("ARS")(3),(24)
|
Texas/Oilfield
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC
senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
$
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,839
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
ARS
senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
$
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,247
|
|
|
|
34,931
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
Maverick
Healthcare, LLC
|
Arizona/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
units (79,000,000 total class A common units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Preferred
units (79,000,000 total preferred units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Second
lien debt, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, 4/30/2014(3)
|
|
|
$
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,943
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
Miller
Petroleum, Inc.(25)
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants,
common shares, expiring 5/04/2010 to 6/30/2014 (15,811,856 total common
shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,935,523
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
Peerless
Manufacturing Co.(3)
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
secured note, 11.50% plus 3.50%PIK, 4/29/2013
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
Qualitest
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3),(26)
|
Alabama/
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 8.10%, 4/30/2015
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
Regional
Management Corp.(3)
|
South
Carolina/ Financial Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 6/29/2012
|
|
|
$
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
Resco
Products, Inc.(3),(27)
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 8.67%, 6/22/2014
|
|
|
$
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Shearer's
Foods, Inc.
|
Ohio/Food
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership
interest units in Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC (45,300 total membership
units outstanding)(28)
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Second
lien debt, 14.00%, 10/31/2013(3)
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,360
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
21,779
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
Stryker
Energy, LLC(29)
|
Ohio/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding
Royalty Interests
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
secured revolving credit facility, 12.00%,
12/01/2011(3),(30)
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
29,554
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
32,472
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
TriZetto
Group(3)
|
California/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
unsecured note, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, 10/01/2016
|
|
|
$
|
15,205
|
|
|
$
|
15,065
|
|
|
$
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
Unitek(3),(31)
|
Pennsylvania/
Technical Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 13.08%, 12/31/2013
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
Wind
River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.(21)
|
Utah/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
profits interest, 5.00% payable on equity distributions
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, stated rate 13.00% plus 3.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 12/01/2008, matures
7/31/2010(32)
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Total
Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,775
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
|
Total
Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,424
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
%
|
|
Money Market
Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds -Government Portfolio
(Class I)
|
|
|
|
94,752,972
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds -Government Portfolio
(Class I)(3)
|
|
|
|
3,982,278
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Total Money Market
Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
%
|
|
Control
Investments (25.00% or greater of voting
control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine
|
South
Carolina/ Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
common shares (7 total unrestricted common shares issued and outstanding
and 803.18 restricted common shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series A
convertible preferred shares (7,222.6 total preferred shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
6,142.6
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
secured note — Tranche B,11.50% plus 6.00% PIK,
4/01/2013(3),(4)
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note — Tranche A, 10.50%,
4/01/2013(3),(5)
|
|
|
$
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,683
|
|
|
|
39,683
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
C&J
Cladding LLC(3)
|
Texas/Metal Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant,
common units, expiring 3/30/2014 (600 total company units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 14.00%, 3/30/2012(6)
|
|
|
$
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
4,607
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.(8)
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,221
|
|
|
|
41,542
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
Subordinated
secured note, 18.00%, 12/22/2009(3)
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,221
|
|
|
|
61,542
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.(9)
|
North
Carolina/ Contracting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series A
preferred shares (10 total Series A preferred shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Junior
secured note, 14.00%, 9/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 14.00%, 9/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Senior
demand note, 15.00%, 6/30/2009(10)
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,464
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
Alberta,
Canada/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (1,093 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Warrants
for common shares(33)
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 15.00%, 4/19/2009
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,094
|
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
Bridge
loan, 15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 12/11/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,465
|
|
|
|
11,182
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
NRG
Manufacturing, Inc.
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (1,000 total common shares issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
8,656
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 16.50%, 8/31/2011(3),(11)
|
|
|
$
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
21,736
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
R-V
Industries, Inc.
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares (800,000 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
545,107
|
|
|
|
5,031
|
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
Warrants,
common shares, expiring 6/30/2017
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 15.00%, 6/30/2017(3)
|
|
|
$
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
18,549
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
Worcester
Energy Partners, Inc.(7)
|
Maine/
Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
ownership
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 12.50%, 12/31/2012
|
|
|
$
|
37,388
|
|
|
|
37,264
|
|
|
|
15,579
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,721
|
|
|
|
15,580
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.(12)
|
Kentucky/
Mining
and Coal Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock (1,000 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Junior
secured note, 12.50%, 12/31/2010
|
|
|
$
|
30,136
|
|
|
|
30,136
|
|
|
|
15,726
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 12.50%, 12/31/2010
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,420
|
|
|
|
25,726
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
Total Control
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,661
|
|
|
|
205,827
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to
24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian
Energy Holdings LLC(3),(13)
|
West
Virginia/ Construction Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants —
Class A common units, expiring 2/13/2016 (49,753 total class A
common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
12,090
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Series A
preferred equity (16,125 total series A preferred equity units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Series B
preferred equity (794 total series B preferred equity units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt Tranche A, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK,
1/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Senior
Secured Debt Tranche B, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK,
05/01/2009
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Total
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Gilsonite Company
|
Utah/Specialty
Minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership
interest units in AGC/PEP, LLC(16)
|
|
|
|
99.9999
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
Senior
subordinated note, 12.00% plus 3.00%, 3/14/2013(3)
|
|
|
$
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,632
|
|
|
|
15,632
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
Conquest
Cherokee, LLC
(3),
(17),(18)
|
Tennessee/Oil
and
Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
secured note, 13.00%, 5/05/2009
|
|
|
$
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
9,923
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
Deb
Shops, Inc.(3),(19)
|
Pennsylvania/
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 10.69%, 10/23/2014
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
14,577
|
|
|
|
13,428
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
Deep
Down, Inc.(3)
|
Texas/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant,
common shares, expiring 8/06/2012(174,732,501 total common shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
4,960,585
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
Diamondback
Operating, LP(3),(21)
|
Oklahoma/
Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
secured note, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 8/28/2011
|
|
|
$
|
9,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,108
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
Freedom
Marine Services LLC
(3),
(21),(22)
|
Louisiana/
Shipping
Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
secured note, 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK, 12/31/2011
|
|
|
$
|
6,948
|
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
6,805
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
H&M
Oil & Gas, LLC
(3),
(21),(23)
|
Texas/Oil
and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
secured note, 13.00%, 6/30/2010
|
|
|
$
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
IEC
Systems LP ("IEC")/Advanced Rig Services LLC
("ARS")(3),(24)
|
Texas/Oilfield
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC
senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
$
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
ARS
senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
$
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,853
|
|
|
|
24,853
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
Maverick
Healthcare, LLC(3)
|
Arizona/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
units (78,100,000 total common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
Preferred
units (78,100,000 total preferred units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Senior
secured note, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, 10/13/2014
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,752
|
|
|
|
13,752
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
Miller
Petroleum, Inc.
|
Tennessee/
Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants,
common shares, expiring 5/04/2010 to3/31/2013 (14,566,856 total common
shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
1,571,191
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Peerless
Manufacturing Co.(3)
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
secured note, 11.50% plus 3.50% PIK, 4/30/2013
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
Qualitest
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3),(26)
|
Alabama/
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 12.45%, 4/30/2015
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
Regional
Management Corp.(3)
|
South
Carolina/
Financial
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
secured note, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK,
6/29/2012
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
Resco
Products, Inc.(3),(27)
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 11.06%, 6/24/2014
|
|
|
$
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
Shearer's
Foods, Inc.
|
Ohio/Food
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mistral
Chip Holdings, LLC membership unit (45,300 total membership units
outstanding)(28)
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Second
lien debt, 14.00%, 10/31/2013(3)
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
19,351
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
Stryker
Energy, LLC
(3),
(29),(30)
|
Ohio/Oil
and
Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
revolving credit facility, 12.00%, 11/30/2011
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,041
|
|
|
|
28,518
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
Unitek(3),(31)
|
Pennsylvania/
Technical
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
lien debt, 12.75%, 12/27/2012
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,337
|
|
|
|
11,337
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
Wind
River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
(3),
(21),(32)
|
Utah/Oil
and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
secured note, 13.00%, 7/31/2009
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
14,690
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
Total Non-control/Non-affiliate
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,535
|
|
|
|
285,660
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
%
|
|
Total Portfolio
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,805
|
|
|
|
497,530
|
|
|
|
115.8
|
%
|
|
Money
Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity
Institutional Money Market Funds -Government Portfolio
(Class I)
|
|
|
|
25,954,531
|
|
|
|
25,954
|
|
|
|
25,954
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
First
American Funds, Inc. — Prime Obligations Fund
(Class A)(3)
|
|
|
|
7,045,610
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
Total Money Market
Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
529,805
|
|
|
$
|
530,530
|
|
|
|
123.4
|
%
|
Endnote
Explanations for the Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of June 30, 2009
and June 30, 2008
|
|
(1)
|
The
securities in which Prospect Capital Corporation ("we", "us" or "our") has
invested were acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the "Securities Act."
These securities may be resold only in transactions that are exempt from
registration under the Securities Act.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Fair
value is determined by or under the direction of our Board of Directors
(see Note 2).
|
|
|
(3)
|
Security,
or portion thereof, is held as collateral for the credit facility with
Rabobank Nederland (see Note 11). The market values of these investments
at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 were $434,069 and $376,463,
respectively; they represent 67.2% and 71.0% of total investments at fair
value, respectively.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 11.5% or 3-month LIBOR plus 8.5%; rate reflected is
as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 10.5% or 3-month LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is
as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 14.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected
is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(7)
|
There
are several entities involved in the Biomass investment. We own 100 shares
of common stock in Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. ("WEHI"), representing
100% of the issued and outstanding common stock. WEHI, in turn, owns 51
membership certificates in Biochips LLC ("Biochips"), which represents a
51% ownership stake.
|
|
|
|
We
own 282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc. ("WECO"),
which represents 51% of the issued and outstanding common stock. We own
directly 1,665 shares of common stock in Change Clean Energy Inc.
("CCEI"), f/k/a Worcester Energy Partners, Inc., which represents 51% of
the issued and outstanding common stock and the remaining 49% is owned by
WECO. CCEI owns 100 shares of common stock in Precision Logging and
Landclearing, Inc. ("Precision"), which represents 100% of the issued and
outstanding common stock.
|
|
|
|
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we created two new entities in
anticipation of the foreclosure proceedings against the co-borrowers
(WECO, CCEI and Biochips) Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. ("CCEHI") and
DownEast Power Company, LLC ("DEPC"). We own 1,000 shares of CCEHI,
representing 100% of the issued and outstanding stock, which in turn, owns
a 100% of the membership interests in DEPC.
|
|
|
|
On
March 11, 2009, we foreclosed on the assets formerly held by CCEI and
Biochips with a successful credit bid of $6,000 to acquire the assets. The
assets were subsequently assigned to DEPC.
|
|
|
|
WECO,
CCEI and Biochips are joint borrowers on the term note issued to Prospect
Capital. Effective July 1, 2008, this loan was placed on non-accrual
status.
|
|
|
|
Biochips,
WECO, CCEI, Precision and WEHI currently have no material operations and
no significant assets. As of June 30, 2009, our Board of Directors
assessed a fair value of $0 for all of these equity positions and the loan
position. We have determined that the impairment of both CCEI and CCEHI as
of June 30, 2009 is other than temporary and have recorded a realized loss
for the amount that the amortized cost exceeds the fair value at June 30,
2009. Our Board of Directors set the value of the remaining CCEHI
investment at $2,530 at June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned investment of
us.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Entity
was formed as a result of the debt restructuring of ESA Environmental
Specialist, Inc. In early 2009, we foreclosed on the two loans on
non-accrual status and purchased the underlying personal and real
property. We own 1,000 shares of common stock in The Healing Staff
("THS"), f/k/a Lisamarie Fallon, Inc. representing 100% ownership. We own
1,500 shares of Vets Securing America, Inc. ("VSA"), representing 100%
ownership. VSA is a holding company for the real property of Integrated
Contract Services, Inc. ("ICS") purchased during the foreclosure
process.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Loan
is with THS an affiliate of ICS.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 16.5% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected
is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(12)
|
On
June 30, 2008, we consolidated our holdings in four coal companies into
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc. ("Yatesville"), and consolidated the
operations under one management team. In the transaction, the debt that we
held of C&A Construction, Inc. ("C&A"), Genesis Coal Corp.
("Genesis"), North Fork Collieries LLC ("North Fork") and Unity Virginia
Holdings LLC ("Unity") were exchanged for newly issued debt from
Yatesville, and our ownership interests in C&A, E&L Construction,
Inc. ("E&L"), Whymore Coal Company Inc. ("Whymore"), Genesis and North
Fork were exchanged for 100% of the equity of Yatesville. This
reorganization allows for a better utilization of the assets in the
consolidated group.
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2009 and at June 30, 2008, Yatesville owned 100% of the
membership interest of North Fork. In addition, Yatesville held a $8,062
and $5,721, respectively, note receivable from North Fork as of those two
respective dates.
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2009 and at June 30, 2008, Yatesville owned 87% and 75%,
respectively, of the common stock of Genesis and held a note receivable of
$20,802 and $17,692, respectively, as of those two respective
dates.
|
|
|
|
Yatesville
held a note receivable of $4,261 and $3,902, respectively, from Unity at
June 30, 2009 and at June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
There
are several entities involved in Yatesville's investment in Whymore at
June 30, 2009 and at June 30, 2008. As of those two respective dates,
Yatesville owned 10,000 shares of common stock or 100% of the equity and
held a $14,973 and $12,822, respectively, senior secured debt receivable
from C&A, which owns the equipment. Yatesville owned 10,000 shares of
common stock or 100% of the equity of E&L, which leases the equipment
from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator with the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives revenues and pays all
operating expenses. Yatesville owns 4,900 shares of common stock or 49% of
the equity of Whymore, which applies for and holds permits on behalf of
E&L. Yatesville also owned 4,285 Series A convertible preferred shares
in each of C&A, E&L and Whymore. Additionally, Yatesville retains
an option to purchase the remaining 51% of Whymore. Whymore and E&L
are guarantors under the C&A credit agreement with
Yatesville.
|
|
|
(13)
|
There
are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC
("AEH") investment. We own warrants, the exercise of which will permit us
to purchase 15,215 units of Class A common units of AEH at a nominal cost
and in near-immediate fashion. We own 200 units of Series A preferred
equity, 241 units of Series B preferred equity, and 62.5 units of Series C
preferred equity of AEH. The senior secured notes are with C&S
Operating LLC and East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned
by AEH.
|
|
|
(14)
|
On
a fully diluted basis represents, 11.677% of voting common
shares.
|
|
|
(15)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 11.5% or 6-month LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is
as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(16)
|
We
own 99.9999% of AGC/PEP, LLC. AGC/PEP, LLC owns 2,038 out of a total of
65,232 shares of American Gilsonite Holding Company which owns 100% of
American Gilsonite Company.
|
|
|
(17)
|
In
addition to the stated returns, we also hold overriding royalty interests
on which we receive payment based upon operations of the borrower and net
profits interest of 10.00% on equity distributions which will be realized
upon sale of the borrower or a sale of the interests.
|
|
|
(18)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 13.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.5% not to exceed
14.50%; rate reflected is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June
30, 2008, as applicable.
|
|
|
(19)
|
Interest
rate is 3-Month LIBOR plus 8.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as applicable.
|
|
|
(20)
|
In
January 2009, our loan was repaid in full and we retained a 15.0% net
profits interest payable on equity distributions.
|
|
|
(21)
|
In
addition to the stated returns, we also hold net profits interest which
will be realized upon sale of the borrower or a sale of the
interests.
|
|
|
(22)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 12.0% or 3-Month LIBOR plus 6.11%; rate reflected
is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(23)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 13.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected
is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(24)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 12.0% or 12-month LIBOR plus 6.0%; rate reflected
is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(25)
|
Total
common shares outstanding of 15,811,856 as of March 11, 2009 from Miller
Petroleum, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 16,
2009.
|
|
|
(26)
|
Interest
rate is 3-Month LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(27)
|
Interest
rate is 3-Month LIBOR plus 8.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as applicable.
|
|
|
(28)
|
Mistral
Chip Holdings, LLC owns 45,300 shares out of 50,500 total shares
outstanding of Chip Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Shearer's Foods,
Inc.
|
|
|
(29)
|
In
addition to the stated returns, we also hold overriding royalty interests
on which we receive payment based upon operations of the
borrower.
|
|
|
(30)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 12.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected
is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(31)
|
As
of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, interest rate is the greater of 13.08%
and 12.75%, respectively, or 3-Month LIBOR plus 7.25%; rate reflected is
as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable.
|
|
|
(32)
|
Interest
rate is the greater of 13.0% or 12-month LIBOR plus 7.5% not to exceed
14.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting date — June 30, 2009 or June
30, 2008, as applicable.
|
|
|
(33)
|
The
number of these warrants which are exercisable is contingent upon the
length of time that passes before the bridge loan is repaid, 224 shares on
August 11, 2008, 340 additional shares on October 11, 2008 and 574
additional shares on December 11,
2008.
|
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2009
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note
1. Organization
References
herein to "we", "us" or "our" refer to Prospect Capital Corporation and its
subsidiary unless the context specifically requires otherwise.
We
were formerly known as Prospect Energy Corporation, a Maryland corporation. We
were organized on April 13, 2004 and were funded in an initial public offering
("IPO"), completed on July 27, 2004. We are a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a Business Development Company ("BDC"),
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). As a BDC, we have
qualified and have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company
("RIC"), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project financings,
recapitalizations, and other purposes.
On
May 15, 2007, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Prospect Capital Funding,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the purpose of holding certain of
our loan investments in the portfolio which are used as collateral for our
credit facility.
Note
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The
following are significant accounting policies consistently applied by
us:
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("GAAP") and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-K and
Regulation S-X. The financial results of our portfolio investments are not
consolidated in the financial statements.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of GAAP financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses
during the reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial
markets, creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any other parameters
used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ, and
these differences could be material.
Basis
of Consolidation
Under
the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X and
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Audit and Accounting
Guide for Investment Companies, we are precluded from consolidating any entity
other than another investment company or an operating company which provides
substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our financial statements
include our accounts and the accounts of Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, our only
wholly-owned, closely-managed subsidiary that is also an investment company. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Investment
Classification
We
are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. We classify
our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control
investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a
controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is
generally deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has the
right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial ownership of 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and
affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed
to exist through the possession outright or via the right to acquire within 60
days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting
securities of another person.
Investments
are recognized when we assume an obligation to acquire a financial instrument
and assume the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument. Investments
are derecognized when we assume an obligation to sell a financial instrument and
forego the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument. Specifically,
we record all security transactions on a trade date basis. Investments in other,
non-security financial instruments are recorded on the basis of subscription
date or redemption date, as applicable. Amounts for investments recognized or
derecognized but not yet settled are reported as receivables for investments
sold and payables for investments purchased, respectively, in the Consolidated
Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Investment
Valuation
Our
Board of Directors has established procedures for the valuation of our
investment portfolio. These procedures are detailed below.
Investments
for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market
quotations.
For
most of our investments, market quotations are not available. With respect to
investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such
market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of Directors
has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described
below:
(1)
Each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our investment professionals
with the independent valuation firm engaged by our Board of
Directors;
(2)
the independent valuation firm conducts independent appraisals and makes their
own independent assessment;
(3)
the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews and discusses the
preliminary valuation of our Investment Adviser and that of the independent
valuation firm; and
(4)
the Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of
each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of our
Investment Adviser, the respective independent valuation firm and the audit
committee.
Investments
are valued utilizing a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches,
as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation
techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a
single present value amount (discounted) calculated based on an appropriate
discount rate. The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these
approaches, the types of
factors
that we may take into account in fair value pricing our investments include, as
relevant: available current market data, including relevant and applicable
market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and
multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights,
the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's
ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in
which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of
peer companies that are public, M&A comparables, the principal market and
enterprise values, among other factors.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements"
("FAS 157"). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those years. We
have adopted this statement on a prospective basis beginning in the quarter
ended September 30, 2008. Adoption of this statement did not have a material
impact on our financial statements for the year ended June 30,
2009.
FAS
157 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following
hierarchy:
Level 1
: Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by us
at the measurement date.
Level 2
: Quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level
3
: Unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability.
In
all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value
measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to each investment.
The changes to GAAP from the application of FAS 157 relate to the definition of
fair value, framework for measuring fair value, and the expanded disclosures
about fair value measurements. FAS 157 applies to fair value measurements
already required or permitted by other standards. In accordance with FAS 157,
the fair value of our investments is defined as the price that we would receive
upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in
the principal or most advantageous market in which that investment is
transacted.
In
April 2009, FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When
the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" ("FSP FAS 157-4").
FSP FAS 157-4 provides further clarification for the application of FAS 157 in
markets that are not active and provides additional guidance for determining
when the volume of trading level of activity for an asset or liability has
significantly decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 for
the year ended June 30, 2009, did not have any effect on our net asset value,
financial position or results of operations as there was no change to the fair
value measurement principles set forth in FAS 157.
Valuation
of Other Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In
February 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,
"The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities —
including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115"
("FAS
159"). FAS 159 permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and
subsequent measurement attribute for many of assets and liabilities for which
the fair value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities
measured using another measurement attribute. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those years. We have adopted this statement on July
1, 2008 and have elected not to value some assets and liabilities at fair value
as would be permitted by FAS 159.
Revenue
Recognition
Realized
gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific
identification method.
Interest
income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is
recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, closing and/or commitment fees
associated with investments in portfolio companies are accreted into interest
income over the respective terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of
a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as interest
income.
Loans
are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past
due 90 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest
will be collected. Unpaid accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is
placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans
may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management's
judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due
principal and interest is paid and in management's judgment, are likely to
remain current.
Dividend
income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Structuring
fees and similar fees are recognized as income as earned, usually when paid.
Structuring fees, excess deal deposits, net profits interests and overriding
royalty interests are included in other income.
Federal
and State Income Taxes
We
have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company and intend to
continue to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(the "Code"), applicable to regulated investment companies. We are required to
distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend to
distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of our investment
company taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore, we have
made no provision for income taxes. The character of income and gains that we
will distribute is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to stockholder
dividends and distributions and other permanent book and tax differences are
reclassified to paid-in capital.
If
we do not distribute (or are not deemed to have distributed) at least 98% of our
annual taxable income in the calendar year earned, we will generally be required
to pay an excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our annual
taxable income exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for the year.
To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year annual taxable
income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions from
such taxable income, we accrue excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable
income as taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax rate.
The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by dividing the estimated
annual excise tax by the estimated annual taxable income. During the quarter
ended December 31, 2008, we elected to retain a portion of our annual taxable
income and paid $533 for the excise tax with the filing of the return in March
2009.
We
adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes"
("FIN 48"). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be
recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN
48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the
course of preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are
"more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax
positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as
a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 was applied to
all open tax years as of July 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an
effect on our net asset value, financial condition or results of operations as
there was no liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no change to our
beginning net asset value. As of June 30, 2009 and for the twelve months then
ended, we did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits.
Management's determinations regarding FIN 48 may be subject to review and
adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to, an
on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations
thereof.
Dividends
and Distributions
Dividends
and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
The amount, if any, to be paid as a dividend is approved by our Board of
Directors each quarter and is generally based upon our management's estimate of
our earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any, are
distributed at least annually.
Financing
Costs
We
record origination expenses related to our credit facility as deferred financing
costs. These expenses are deferred and amortized as part of interest expense
using a method that appropriates the effective interest method.
We
record registration expenses related to shelf filings as prepaid assets. These
expenses consist principally of Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
registration, legal and accounting fees incurred through June 30, 2009 that are
related to the shelf filings that will be charged to capital upon the receipt of
the capital or charged to expense if not completed.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements
We
follow FASB Interpretation Number 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosure requirements of a
guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations
under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, for those guarantees that are
covered by FIN 45, the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing
certain guarantees. FIN 45 did not have a material effect on the financial
statements. Refer to Note 3, Note 7 and Note 10 for further discussion of
guarantees and indemnification agreements.
Per
Share Information
Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share are calculated
using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period
presented. Diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per
share are not presented as there are no potentially dilutive securities
outstanding.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made in the presentation of prior consolidated
financial statements to conform to the presentation as of and for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2009.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
141(R) , "Business Combinations" ("FAS 141(R)"). FAS 141(R) establishes
accounting principles and disclosure requirements for all transactions in which
a company obtains control over another business. The standard is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Our management does not believe
that the adoption of FAS 141(R) will have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,
"Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133" ("FAS 161"). FAS 161 is intended to improve financial
reporting for derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that
enables investors to understand how and why the entity uses derivatives, how
derivatives are accounted for, and how derivatives affect an entity's results of
operations, financial position, and cash flows. FAS 161 becomes effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008; therefore, is applicable for our
fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009. Our management does not believe that the
adoption of FAS 161 will have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162,
"The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("FAS 162"). FAS 162
identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting
the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This
statement is effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Our
management does not believe that the adoption of FAS 162 will have a material
impact on our financial statements.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165,
"Subsequent Events" ("FAS 165"). FAS 165 establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The
standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an
entity has evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We evaluated all events or transactions that
occurred after June 30, 2009 up through September 11, 2009, the date we issued
these financial statements. Management has also evaluated all events or
transactions from September 12, 2009 through November 6, 2009, and has updated
Note 12 for any additional transactions which have occurred, which are
unaudited. During these periods, we did not have any material recognizable
subsequent events other than those disclosed in Note 12.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168,
"The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" ("FAS
168"). FAS 168 provides for the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
"Codification") to become the single official source of authoritative,
nongovernmental GAAP. The Codification did not change GAAP but reorganizes the
literature. FAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Our management does not believe that the adoption of FAS 168
will have a material impact on our financial statements.
Note
3. Portfolio Investments
At
June 30, 2009, we had invested in 30 long-term portfolio investments, which had
an amortized cost of $531,424 and a fair value of $547,168 and at June 30, 2008,
we had invested in 29 long-term portfolio investments (including a net profits
interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading LLC), which had an amortized cost of
$496,805 and a fair value of $497,530.
As
of June 30, 2009, we own controlling interests in Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine
("Ajax"), C&J Cladding, LLC ("C&J"), Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
("CCEHI"), Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. ("GSHI"), Integrated
Contract
Services, Inc. ("ICS"), Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. ("Iron Horse"), NRG
Manufacturing, Inc. ("NRG"), R-V Industries, Inc. ("R-V"), and Yatesville Coal
Holdings, Inc. ("Yatesville"). We also own an affiliated interest in Appalachian
Energy Holdings, LLC ("AEH") and Biotronic NeuroNetwork
("Biotronic").
The
fair values of our portfolio investments as of June 30, 2009 disaggregated into
the three levels of the FAS 157 valuation hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Securities
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
investments
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
Affiliate
investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
Investments
in money market funds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
Total
assets reported at fair value
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
98,735
|
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
The
aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments changed during the twelve
months ended June 30, 2009 as follows:
Change
in Portfolio Valuations using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level
3)
|
Fair
value at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
497,530
|
|
|
Total
gains (losses) reported in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income — accretion of original issue discount on
investments
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
Included
in realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(39,078
|
)
|
|
Included
in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
|
Payments
for purchases of investments, payment-in-kind interest, and net profits
interests
|
|
|
98,305
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of investments and collection of investment
principal
|
|
|
(27,007
|
)
|
|
Fair
value at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
The
amount of net unrealized gain included in the results of operations
attributable to Level 3 assets still held at June 30, 2009 and
reported within the caption Net change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations:
|
|
$
|
19,397
|
|
At
June 30, 2009, we determined that one of our investments, Change Clean Energy
Inc. ("CCEI"), was other than temporarily impaired and recorded a realized loss
representing the amount by which the amortized cost exceeded the fair value. At
June 30, 2009, five loan investments were on non-accrual status: AEH, Conquest
Cherokee, LLC ("Conquest"), ICS, Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II
Corp. ("Wind River"), and Yatesville. At June 30, 2008, the loans extended to
ICS were on non-accrual status. The loan principal of these loans amounted to
$92,513 and $14,803 as of June 30, 2009, and June 30, 2008, respectively. The
fair values of these investments represent approximately 7.3% and 0.9% of our
net assets as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. For the years
ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, the income foregone as a
result of not accruing interest on non-accrual debt investments amounted to
$18,746, $3,449 and $1,270, respectively.
GSHI
has indemnified us against any legal action arising from its investment in Gas
Solutions, LP. We have incurred approximately $2,093 from the inception of the
investment in GSHI through June 30, 2009 for fees associated with a legal
action, and GSHI has reimbursed us for the entire amount. The $2,093
reimbursement is reflected as dividend income: control investments in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations with $179, $118 and $178 reflected for the
year ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively, and the
remainder
reflected
in prior periods. Additionally, certain other expenses incurred by us which are
attributable to GSHI have been reimbursed by GSHI and are reflected as dividend
income: control investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For
the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, such
reimbursements totaled as $4,422, $4,589 and $2,578, respectively.
The
original cost basis of debt placements and equity securities acquired, including
follow-on investments for existing portfolio companies, totaled $98,305,
$311,947 and $167,255 during the year ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007, respectively. Debt repayments and sales of equity securities with
a cost basis of approximately $66,084, $143,434 and $36,458 were received during
the year ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively.
Note
4. Other Investment Income
Other
investment income consists of structuring fees, overriding royalty interests,
prepayment penalty on net profits interests, settlement of net profits
interests, deal deposits, administrative agent fee, and other miscellaneous and
sundry cash receipts. Income from such sources was $14,762, $8,336 and $4,444
for the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively.
|
|
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structuring
fees
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
$
|
4,751
|
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
Overriding
royalty interests
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
Prepayment
penalty on net profits interests
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
Settlement
of net profits interests
|
|
|
12,651
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Deal
deposit
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
Administrative
agent fee
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other
Investment Income
|
|
$
|
14,762
|
|
|
$
|
8,336
|
|
|
$
|
4,444
|
|
Note
5. Equity Offerings and Related Expenses
During
the year ended June 30, 2009, we issued 12,942,500 shares of our common stock
through public offerings, a registered direct offering, and through the exercise
of over-allotment options on the part of the underwriters. Offering expenses
were charged against paid-in capital in excess of par. All underwriting fees and
offering expenses were borne by us. The proceeds raised, the related
underwriting fees, the offering expenses, and the prices at which common stocks
were issued since inception are detailed in the following table:
Issuances
of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 26,
2009 over-allotment
|
|
|
1,012,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,353
|
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8.250
|
|
|
May 26,
2009
|
|
|
6,750,000
|
|
|
|
55,687
|
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
8.250
|
|
|
April 27,
2009 over-allotment
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
April 27,
2009
|
|
|
3,200,000
|
|
|
|
24,800
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
March 19,
2009
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
8.200
|
|
|
June 2,
2008
|
|
|
3,250,000
|
|
|
|
48,425
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
14.900
|
|
|
March 31,
2008
|
|
|
1,150,000
|
|
|
|
17,768
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
15.450
|
|
|
March 28,
2008
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
19,786
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
15.220
|
|
|
November 13,
2007 over-allotment
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3,268
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16.340
|
|
|
October 17,
2007
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
57,190
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
16.340
|
|
|
January 11,
2007 over-allotment
|
|
|
810,000
|
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17.315
|
(1)
|
|
December 13,
2006
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
106,200
|
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
17.700
|
|
|
August 28,
2006 over-allotment
|
|
|
745,650
|
|
|
|
11,408
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15.300
|
|
|
August 10,
2006
|
|
|
4,971,000
|
|
|
|
76,056
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
15.300
|
|
|
August 27,
2004 over-allotment
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15.000
|
|
|
July 27,
2004
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
15.000
|
|
|
(1)
|
We
declared a dividend of $0.385 per share between offering and over —
allotment dates.
|
Our
shareholders' equity accounts at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 reflect
cumulative shares issued as of those respective dates. Our common stock has been
issued through public offerings, a registered direct offering, the exercise of
over-allotment options on the part of the underwriters and our dividend
reinvestment plan. When our common stock is issued, the related offering
expenses have been charged against paid-in capital in excess of par. All
underwriting fees and offering expenses were borne by us.
On
October 9, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase plan under
which we may repurchase up to $20,000 of our common stock at prices below our
net asset value as reported in our financial statements published for the year
ended June 30, 2008. We have not made any purchases of our common stock during
the period from October 9, 2008 to June 30, 2009 pursuant to this
plan.
Note
6. Net Increase in Net Assets per Common Share
The
following information sets forth the computation of net increase in net assets
resulting from operations per common share for the years ended June 30, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations per common
share
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
Note
7. Related Party Agreements and Transactions
Investment
Advisory Agreement
We
have entered into an investment advisory and management agreement with Prospect
Capital Management (the "Investment Advisory Agreement") under which the
Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of our Board of
Directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment
advisory services to, us. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement,
our Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our portfolio, the
nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing
such changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the
investments we make (including performing due diligence on our prospective
portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and monitors investments we
make.
Prospect
Capital Management's services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not
exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long
as its services to us are not impaired. For providing these services the
Investment Adviser receives a fee from us, consisting of two components: a base
management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an
annual rate of 2.00% on our gross assets (including amounts borrowed). For
services currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base
management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is
calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the end of the two
most recently completed calendar quarters and appropriately adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
The
Investment Adviser had previously voluntarily agreed to waive 0.5% of the base
management fee if in the future the average amount of our gross assets for each
of the two most recently completed calendar quarters at that time, appropriately
adjusted for any share issuances, repurchases or other transactions during such
quarters, exceeds $750,000, for that portion of the average amount of our gross
assets that exceeds $750,000. The voluntary
agreement
by the Investment Adviser for such waiver for each fiscal quarter after December
31, 2007 has been terminated by the Investment Adviser.
The
total base management fees earned by and paid to Prospect Capital Management for
the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were $11,915,
$8,921 and $5,445, respectively.
The
incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income incentive fee, is
calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our pre-incentive fee net
investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this
purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend
income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for
providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees and other fees that we receive from portfolio
companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating expenses for
the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the
Administration Agreement described below, and any interest expense and dividends
paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of
investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount,
debt instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon securities),
accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net
investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital
losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net
investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets
at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
"hurdle rate" of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
Previously,
our Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed that for each fiscal quarter from
January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2007, the quarterly hurdle rate was to be equal to
the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal to the sum of 25.0% of the
daily average of the "quoted treasury rate" for each month in the immediately
preceding two quarters plus 0.50%. "Quoted treasury rate" means the yield to
maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis) at the time of
computation for Five Year U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as
compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release
H). These calculations were to be appropriately prorated for any period of less
than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the
current quarter. The voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the
hurdle rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after January 1, 2005 (as
discussed above) was terminated by the Investment Adviser as of the June 30,
2007 quarter. The investment adviser had also voluntarily agreed that, in the
event it is paid an incentive fee at a time when our common stock is trading at
a price below $15 per share for the immediately preceding 30 days (as adjusted
for stock splits, recapitalizations and other transactions), it will cause the
amount of such incentive fee payment to be held in an escrow account by an
independent third party, subject to applicable regulations. The Investment
Adviser had further agreed that this amount may not be drawn upon by the
Investment Adviser or any affiliate or any other third party until such time as
the price of our common stock achieves an average 30 day closing price of at
least $15 per share. The Investment Adviser also had voluntarily agreed to cause
30% of any incentive fee that it is paid and that is not otherwise held in
escrow to be invested in shares of our common stock through an independent
trustee. Any sales of such stock were to comply with any applicable six month
holding period under Section 16(b) of the Securities Act and all other
restrictions contained in any law or regulation, to the fullest extent
applicable to any such sale. These two voluntary agreements by the Investment
Adviser have been terminated by the Investment Adviser for all incentive fees
after December 31, 2007.
The
net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also
included in the amount of the gross assets used to calculate the 2.00% base
management fee. We pay the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows:
|
|
·
|
no
incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net
investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate;
|
|
|
·
|
100.00%
of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that
portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that
exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 125.00% of
the
|
|
|
|
quarterly
hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate); and
|
|
|
·
|
20.00%
of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that
exceeds 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle
rate).
|
These
calculations are appropriately prorated for any period of less than three months
and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current
quarter.
The
second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, is determined
and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination
of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of our realized capital gains for the calendar year, if any, computed net
of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of
such year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to the
Investment Adviser, we calculate the aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate
realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as
applicable, with respect to each investment that has been in its portfolio. For
the purpose of this calculation, an "investment" is defined as the total of all
rights and claims which maybe asserted against a portfolio company arising from
our participation in the debt, equity, and other financial instruments issued by
that company. Aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the
differences between the aggregate net sales price of each investment and the
aggregate cost basis of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed.
Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the
aggregate net sales price of each investment is less than the aggregate cost
basis of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation equals the sum of the differences, if negative, between the
aggregate valuation of each investment and the aggregate cost basis of such
investment as of the applicable calendar year-end . At the end of the applicable
calendar year, the amount of capital gains that serves as the basis for our
calculation of the capital gains incentive fee involves netting aggregate
realized capital gains against aggregate realized capital losses on a
since-inception basis and then reducing this amount by the aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation. If this number is positive, then the capital gains
incentive fee payable is equal to 20.00% of such amount, less the aggregate
amount of any capital gains incentive fees paid since inception.
Income
incentive fees totaling $14,790, $11,278 and $5,781 were earned for the years
ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. No capital
gains incentive fees were earned for years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008
and June 30, 2007.
Administration
Agreement
We
have also entered into an Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration,
LLC ("Prospect Administration") under which Prospect Administration, among other
things, provides (or arranges for the provision of) administrative services and
facilities for us. For providing these services, we reimburse Prospect
Administration for our allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance
officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs. For the years
ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the reimbursement was approximately $2,856,
$2,139 and $532, respectively. Under this agreement, Prospect Administration
furnishes us with office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and
record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect Administration also
performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services,
which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records
that we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and
reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration assists us in
determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the preparation and
filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the
performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by
others. Under the Administration Agreement, Prospect Administration also
provides on our behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to
which we are required to provide such assistance. The Administration Agreement
may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days' written notice
to the other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our
Investment Adviser.
The
Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless
disregard of its duties and obligations, Prospect Administration and its
officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members
and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administration's services under the
Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for us.
Prospect
Administration previously engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC ("Vastardis") to
serve as our sub-administrator to perform certain services required of Prospect
Administration. On April 30, 2009 we gave a 60-day notice to Vastardis of
termination of our agreement to provide sub-administration services effective
June 30, 2009. We entered into a new consulting services agreement for the
period from July 1, 2009 until the filing of our Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2009. We paid Vastardis a total of $30 for services rendered in
conjunction with preparation of Form 10-K under the new agreement. All
administration services were assumed by Prospect Administration effective
September 14, 2009.
Managerial
Assistance
As
a business development company, we offer, and must provide upon request,
managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. This assistance
could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our portfolio
companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and
advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and
financial guidance. We billed $846, $1,027, and $505 of managerial assistance
fees for the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, and June 30, 2007,
respectively, of which $60 and $380 remains on the consolidated statement of
assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2009, and June 30, 2008, respectively.
These fees are paid to the Administrator so we simultaneously accrue a payable
to the Administrator for the same amounts, which remain on the consolidated
statements of assets and liabilities.
Note
8. Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Share Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
Costs
related to the initial public offering
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
Costs
related to the secondary public offering
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
investment income
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
Realized
(loss) gain
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets as a result of public
offering
|
|
|
(2.11
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
Dividends
declared and paid
|
|
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
Net
asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
Per
share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
|
Total
return based on market value(2)
|
|
|
(22.04
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.90
|
)%
|
|
|
12.65
|
%
|
|
|
44.90
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
|
Total
return based on net asset value(2)
|
|
|
(4.81
|
)%
|
|
|
7.84
|
%
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
Shares
outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
Average
weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
Ratio
/Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
assets at end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
Annualized
ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
9.03
|
%
|
|
|
9.62
|
%
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
|
Annualized
ratio of net investment income to average net assets
|
|
|
13.14
|
%
|
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
|
9.71
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Financial
highlights are based on weighted average
shares.
|
|
(2)
|
Total
return based on market value is based on the change in market price per
share between the opening and ending market prices per share in each
period and assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with our
dividend reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is based
upon the change in net asset value per share between the opening and
ending net asset values per share in each period and assumes that
dividends are reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment
plan.
|
Note
9. Litigation
From
time to time, we may become involved in various investigations, claims and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These matters may
relate to intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or other
matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise will be subject to
various uncertainties and, even if such claims are without merit, could result
in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial
resources.
On
December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, L.P. ("DGP") served us with a complaint
filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division. DGP alleges that DGP was defrauded and that we breached our
fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with DGP's contract to purchase
Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection
with our alleged agreement in September 2004 to loan DGP funds with which DGP
intended to buy Gas Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint
sought relief not limited to $100,000. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate
Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Texas, Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant our
Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006,
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Galveston Division issued an order granting our Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP, against us. On May 16, 2007, the
Court also granted us summary judgment on DGP's liability to us on our
counterclaim for DGP's breach of a release and covenant not to sue. On January
4, 2008, the Court, Judge Melinda Harmon presiding, granted our motion to
dismiss all DGP's claims asserted against certain of our officers and
affiliates. On August 20, 2008, Judge Harmon entered a Final Judgment dismissing
all of DGP's claims. DGP appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, which affirmed the Final Judgment on June 24, 2009. DGP has moved for
rehearing. Our damage claims against DGP remain pending.
In
May 2006, based in part on unfavorable due diligence and the absence of
investment committee approval, we declined to extend a loan for $10,000 to a
potential borrower ("plaintiff"). Plaintiff was subsequently sued by its own
attorney in a local Texas court for plaintiff's failure to pay fees owed to its
attorney. In December 2006, plaintiff filed a cross-action against us and
certain affiliates (the "defendants") in the same local Texas court, alleging,
among other things, tortuous interference with contract and fraud. We petitioned
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the
"District Court") to compel arbitration and to enjoin the Texas action. In
February 2007, our motions were granted. Plaintiff appealed that decision. On
July 24, 2008, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the
District Court. The arbitration commenced in July 2007 and concluded in late
November 2007. Post-hearing briefings were completed in February 2008. On April
14, 2008, the arbitrator rendered an award in our favor, rejecting all of
plaintiff's claims. On April 18, 2008, we filed a petition before the District
Court to confirm the award. On October 8, 2008, the District Court granted the
Company's petition to confirm the award, confirmed the awards and subsequently
entered judgment thereon in favor of the Company in the amount of $2,288. After
filing a defective notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit on November 5, 2008, plaintiff's counsel resubmitted a new
notice of appeal on January 9, 2009. The plaintiff subsequently requested that
the Company agree to stipulate to the withdrawal of plaintiff's appeal to the
Second Circuit. Such a stipulation was filed with the Second Circuit on or about
April 14, 2009. Based on this stipulation, the Second Circuit issued a mandate
terminating the appeal, which was transmitted to the District Court on April 23,
2009. Post-judgment discovery against plaintiff is continuing and we have filed
a motion for sanctions against plaintiff's counsel which is scheduled for
argument on October 5, 2009.
Note
10. Revolving Credit Agreements
On
June 6, 2007, we closed on a $200,000 three-year revolving credit facility (as
amended on December 31, 2007) with Rabobank Nederland ("Rabobank") as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger (the "Rabobank Facility"). Until
November 14, 2008, interest on the Rabobank Facility was charged at LIBOR plus
175 basis points; thereafter, under the terms of a commitment letter with
Rabobank to arrange and structure a new rated credit facility, we agreed to an
immediate increase in the current borrowing rate on the Rabobank Facility to
LIBOR plus 250 basis points. Additionally, Rabobank charged a fee on the unused
portion of the facility. This fee is assessed at the rate of 37.5 basis points
per annum of the amount of that unused portion.
On
June 25, 2009, we completed a first closing on an expanded $250,000 revolving
credit facility (the "Syndicated Facility"). The new Syndicated Facility, which
had $175,000 total commitments as of June 30, 2009, includes an accordion
feature which allows the Syndicated Facility to accept up to an aggregate total
of $250,000 of commitments for which we continue to solicit additional
commitments from other lenders for the additional $75,000. The revolving period
extends through June 24, 2010, with an additional one year amortization period
thereafter whereby all principal, interest and fee payments received in
conjunction with collateral pledged to the Syndicated Facility, less a monthly
servicing fee payable to us, are required to be used to repay outstanding
borrowings under the Syndicated Facility. Any remaining outstanding borrowings
would be due and payable on the commitment termination date, which is currently
June 24, 2011.
The
Syndicated Facility contains restrictions pertaining to the geographic and
industry concentrations of funded loans, maximum size of funded loans, interest
rate payment frequency of funded loans, maturity dates of funded loans and
minimum equity requirements. The Syndicated Facility also contains certain
requirements relating to portfolio performance, including required minimum
portfolio yield and limitations on delinquencies and charge-offs, violation of
which could result in the early termination of the Syndicated Facility. The
Syndicated Facility also requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity
requirement. At June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the applicable
covenants.
Interest
on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month LIBOR plus 400 basis
points, subject to a minimum Libor floor of 200 basis points. Additionally, the
banks charge a fee on the unused portion of the credit facility equal to 100
basis points. As of June 30, 2009, we had $124,800 outstanding under our credit
facility. As of June 30, 2009, $946 was available to us for borrowing under our
credit facility. As we make additional investments which are eligible to be
pledged under the credit facility, we will generate additional availability to
the extent such investments are eligible to be placed into the borrowing base.
At June 30, 2009, the investments used as collateral for the Syndicated Facility
had an aggregate market value of $434,069, which represents 81.5% of net
assets.
In
connection with the origination and amendment of the Syndicated Facility, we
incurred approximately $6.3 million of fees which are being amortized over the
term of the facility.
Note
11. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Realized and
Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)
|
|
|
Net
Increase (Decrease)
in
Net Assets from
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
6,432
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
3,274
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
3,964
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
March 31,
2007
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
June 30,
2007
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
15,391
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
10,660
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
March 31,
2008
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
12,919
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
June 30,
2008
|
|
|
23,448
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
23,986
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
September 30,
2008(2)
|
|
|
35,799
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
(9,504
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
11,960
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
6,524
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
20,669
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
15,331
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
11,981
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
(12,730
|
)
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
(1)
|
Per
share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares during
period.
|
|
(2)
|
Additional
income for this quarter was driven by other investment income from the
settlement of net profits interests on IEC Systems LP and Advanced Rig
Services LLC. See Note 4.
|
Note
12. Subsequent Events
On
July 6, 2009, and July 8, 2009, we paid down $50,500 and $74,300 of our
revolving credit facility, respectively, reducing our outstanding borrowing to
zero.
On
July 7, 2009, we closed a public offering of 5,175,000 shares of our common
stock (including the exercise of over-allotment options of our underwriters).
The net proceeds to us were approximately $44,046 after deducting estimated
offering expenses.
On
July 20, 2009, we purchased 297,274 shares of our common stock in connection
with the dividend reinvestment plan.
On
August 3, 2009, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire Patriot Capital Funding, Inc. (NASDAQ: PCAP) ("Patriot") for
approximately $197,000 comprised of our common stock and cash to repay all
Patriot debt, anticipated to be $110,500. when the acquisition closes. Our
common shares will be exchanged at a ratio of approximately 0.3992 for each
Patriot share, or 8,616,467 shares of our common stock for 21,584,251 Patriot
shares, with such exchange ratio decreased for any tax distributions Patriot may
declare before closing. In return, we will acquire assets with an amortized cost
of approximately $311,000 for approximately $196,000, based on an estimate of
our common stock price of $10 per share and the anticipated debt outstanding at
the closing, the value of either may change prior to the closing. We, in
conjunction with an independent valuation agent, have determined that the fair
value of the assets is approximate to the anticipated purchase price and do not
anticipate recording any material gain on the consummation of the
transaction.
On
August 20, 2009, we issued 3,449,686 shares at $8.50 per share in a private
stock offering. The net proceeds to us were approximately $29,205 after
deducting legal and advisory fees. Concurrent with the sale of these shares, we
entered into a registration rights agreement in which we granted the purchasers
certain registration rights with respect to the Shares. Under the terms and
conditions of the registration rights agreement, we will use our reasonable best
efforts to file with the SEC within sixty (60) days a post-effective amendment
to the registration statement on Form N-2 and will also use our reasonable best
efforts to cause such post-effective amendment to be declared effective by the
SEC within one hundred twenty (120) days. Under the registration rights
agreement, the Corporation may be obligated to make liquidated damages payments
to holders upon certain events.
On
August 31, 2009, C&J repaid the $3,150 loan receivable to us and we received
an additional 5% prepayment penalty totaling $158. We continue to hold warrants
for common units in this investment.
On
September 4, 2009, Peerless Manufacturing Co. repaid the $20,000 loan receivable
to us.
On
September 24, 2009, we issued 2,807,111 shares at $9.00 per share in a private
stock offering. The net proceeds to us were approximately $24,423 after
deducting estimated legal and advisory fees. Concurrent with the sale of these
shares, we entered into a registration rights agreement in which we granted the
purchasers certain registration rights with respect to the Shares. Under the
terms and conditions of the registration rights agreement, we will use our
reasonable best efforts to file with the SEC within sixty (60) days a
post-effective amendment to the registration statement on Form N-2 and will also
use our reasonable best efforts to cause such post-effective amendment to be
declared effective by the SEC within one hundred twenty (120) days. Under the
registration rights agreement, the Corporation may be obligated to make
liquidated damages payments to holders upon certain events.
On
September 28, 2009, we announced the declaration of a cash distribution of
$0.4075 per share to holders of record on October 8, 2009 to be paid on October
19, 2009.
On
September 29, 2009, we announced a $20,000 increase in total commitments on our
revolving credit facility, increasing the facility size from $175,000 to
$195,000.
On
October 19, 2009, we issued 233,523 shares of our common stock in connection
with the dividend reinvestment plan.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not complete and may be
changed. A registration statement relating to these securities has been
filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This preliminary prospectus supplement is not an offer to sell
nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the
offer or sale is not permitted.
__________
Shares
Common
Stock
$__________
per Share
Prospect
Capital Corporation is a financial services company that lends to and invests in
middle market, privately-held companies. We are organized as an
externally-managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company
that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940. Prospect Capital Management LLC manages our
investments, and Prospect Administration LLC provides the administrative
services necessary for us to operate.
We
are offering _______ shares of our common stock. See “Plan of Distribution”
beginning on page S-__ of this prospectus supplement for more information
regarding this offering. These shares may be offered at a discount from our most
recently determined net asset value per share pursuant to authority granted by
our stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11,
2009
.
Sales of common stock at
prices below net asset value per share dilute the interests of existing
stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net asset value per share and may
reduce our market price per share. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page S-__ and
"Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value" beginning on page S-__ of this
prospectus supplement and on page 14 of the accompanying
prospectus.
Our
common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
"PSEC." The last reported closing sales price for our common stock on _______,
2010 was $____ per share and our most recently determined net asset value per
share was $10.06 as of December 31, 2009 ($10.07 on an as adjusted basis solely
to give effect to the issuance of our common stock on January 25, 2010 in
connection with our dividend reinvestment plan).
This
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus contain important
information you should know before investing in our securities. Please read it
before you invest and keep it for future reference. We file annual, quarterly
and current reports, proxy statements and other information about us with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. This information is available
free of charge by contacting us at 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY
10016 or by telephone at (212) 448-0702. The SEC maintains a website at
www.sec.gov where such information is available without charge upon written or
oral request. Our Internet website address is www.prospectstreet.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this
prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus and you should not consider
information contained on our website to be part of this prospectus.
Investing
in our common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors" beginning on
page S-__ of this prospectus supplement and on page 14 of the accompanying
prospectus.
The
SEC has not approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete.
Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Sales
Load (underwriting discounts and commissions)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
to Prospect Capital Corporation, before expenses(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Before
deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us of approximately
$_______.
|
The
underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or about_______,
2010
The underwriters have the option to
purchase up to an additional ______ shares of common stock at the public
offering price, less the sales load (underwriting discounts and commissions),
within 30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement solely to cover
over-allotments. If the over-allotment option is exercised in full, the total
public offering price will be $______, and the total sales load (underwriting
discounts and commissions) will be $______. The proceeds to us would be $______,
before deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us of approximately
$______.
Prospectus
Supplement dated _________, 2010
You
should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus. We have not authorized any other person to provide
you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus. If anyone provides you with different
or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an
offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.
You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus supplement
and the accompanying prospectus is accurate only as of their respective dates.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations may have changed
since those dates. This prospectus supplement supersedes the accompanying
prospectus to the extent it contains information that is different from or in
addition to the information in that prospectus.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT
|
Prospectus
Summary
|
S-1
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
S-6
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
S-7
|
|
Capitalization
|
S-7
|
|
Recent
Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value
|
S-9
|
|
Distributions
and Price Range of Common Stock
|
S-9
|
|
Sales
of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value
|
S-12
|
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
S-12
|
|
Legal
Matters
|
S-16
|
|
Independent
Registered Public Accounting firm
|
S-16
|
|
Available
Information
|
S-16
|
PROSPECTUS
|
About
This Prospectus
|
1
|
|
Prospectus
Summary
|
2
|
|
Selected
Condensed Financial Data
|
8
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
27
|
|
Report
of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
47
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
47
|
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
|
48
|
|
Distributions
|
50
|
|
Senior
Securities
|
52
|
|
Price
Range of Common Stock
|
53
|
|
Business
|
54
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Transactions
|
79
|
|
Control
Persons and Principal Stockholders
|
79
|
|
Portfolio
Companies
|
81
|
|
Determination
of Net Asset Value
|
85
|
|
Sales
of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value
|
86
|
|
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
|
90
|
|
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
|
91
|
|
Description
of Our Capital Stock
|
97
|
|
Description
of Our Preferred Stock
|
104
|
|
Description
of our Debt Securities
|
105
|
|
Description
of Our Warrants
|
106
|
|
Regulation
|
107
|
|
Custodian,
Transfer and Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar
|
113
|
|
Brokerage
Allocation and Other Practices
|
113
|
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
113
|
|
Legal
Matters
|
115
|
|
Independent
Registered accounting Firm
|
115
|
|
Available
Information
|
115
|
|
Index
to Financial Statements
|
116
|
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This
summary highlights some information from this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, and it may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. To understand the terms of the common stock offered hereby,
you should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
carefully. Together, these documents describe the specific terms of the shares
we and the selling stockholders are offering. You should carefully read the
sections titled "Risk Factors" in this prospectus supplement and in the
accompanying prospectus and the documents identified in the section "Available
Information."
The
terms "we," "us," "our" and "Company," refer to Prospect Capital Corporation;
"Prospect Capital Management" and "Investment Advisor" refer to Prospect Capital
Management LLC; and "Prospect Administration" and the "Administrator" refer to
Prospect Administration LLC.
The
Company
Prospect
Capital Corporation is a financial services company that primarily lends to and
invests in middle market privately-held companies. We are a closed-end
investment company that has filed an election to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act.
We invest primarily in senior and subordinated debt and equity of companies in
need of capital for acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project
financing and recapitalization. We work with the management teams or financial
sponsors to seek investments with historical cash flows, asset collateral or
contracted pro-forma cash flows.
Typically,
we concentrate on making investments in companies with annual revenues of less
than $500 million and enterprise values of less than $250 million. Our typical
investment involves a secured loan of less than $50 million with some form of
equity participation. From time to time, we acquire controlling interests in
companies in conjunction with making secured debt investments in such companies.
In most cases, companies in which we invest are privately held at the time we
invest in them. We refer to these companies as "target" or "middle market"
companies and these investments as "middle market investments."
We
seek to maximize total returns to our investors, including both current yield
and equity upside, by applying rigorous credit analysis and asset-based and
cash-flow based lending techniques to make and monitor our investments. A
majority of our investments to date have been in energy-related industries. We
have made no investments to date in the real estate or mortgage industries, and
we do not intend currently to focus on such investments.
We
are currently pursuing multiple investment opportunities, including purchases of
portfolios from private and public companies, as well as originations and
secondary purchases of particular securities. There can be no assurance that we
will successfully consummate any investment opportunity we are currently
pursuing. Motivated sellers, including commercial finance companies, hedge
funds, other business development companies, total return swap counterparties,
banks, collateralized loan obligation funds, and other entities, are suffering
from excess leverage, and we believe we are well positioned to capitalize as
potential buyers of such assets at attractive prices. If any of these
opportunities are consummated, there can be no assurance that investors will
share our view of valuation or that any assets acquired will not be subject to
future write downs, each of which could have an adverse effect on our stock
price.
As
of December 31, 2009, we held investments in 55 portfolio companies. The
aggregate fair value as of December 31, 2009 of investments in these portfolio
companies held on that date is approximately $648 million. Our portfolio across
all our long-term debt and certain equity investments had an annualized current
yield of 15.6% as of December 31, 2009. The yield includes interest as well as
dividends.
Recent
Developments
On January 6, 2010,
we announced a $15 million increase in total commitments on our revolving
credit facility, increasing the facility size from $195 million to $210
million.
Acquisition
of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.
On
December 2, 2009, we completed our previously announced acquisition of Patriot
under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2009, by and
among, us and Patriot. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we
acquired Patriot for approximately $200 million comprised of our common stock
and cash to repay all of Patriot’s outstanding debt, which amounted to $107.3
million. In the merger, each outstanding share of Patriot common
stock was converted into the right to receive 0.363992 shares of common stock of
Prospect, representing 8,444,068 shares of the Company’s common stock, and the
payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares of Prospect common stock of less
than $200 resulting from the application of the foregoing exchange
ratio.
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
At
our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our
stockholders approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of our
common stock at any level of discount from net asset value per share during the
twelve month period following such approval.
The
Offering
|
Common
stock offered by us, excluding the underwriters' over-allotment
option
|
|
_______
shares.
|
|
Common
stock outstanding prior to this offering
|
|
_______
shares.
|
|
Common
stock outstanding
after this offering,
excluding the underwriters’ over-allotment option
|
|
_______
shares.
|
|
Use
of proceeds
|
|
We
expect to use the net proceeds from this offering initially to maintain
balance sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under our credit
facility, investments in high quality short-term debt instruments or a
combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term investments in
accordance with our investment objective.
See “Use of Proceeds” in this prospectus
supplement
.
|
|
The
NASDAQ Global Select Market symbol
|
|
PSEC
|
|
Risk
factors
|
|
See
"Risk Factors" in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus and other information in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully
consider before you decide whether to make an investment in shares of our
common stock.
|
|
Current
distribution rate
|
|
For
our second fiscal quarter of 2010, our Board of Directors declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.40875 per share, representing an annualized
dividend yield of approximately __ % based on our _______, 2010 closing
stock price of $__ per share. Such dividend was payable out of
earnings. Our dividend is subject to change or discontinuance
at any time in the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our future
earnings and operating cash flow may not be sufficient to support a
dividend.
|
Fees
and Expenses
The
following tables are intended to assist you in understanding the costs and
expenses that an investor in this offering will bear directly or indirectly. In
these tables, we assume that we have borrowed $195 million under our recently
completed extended credit facility, which is the maximum amount currently
available under the credit facility. Except where the context suggests
otherwise, whenever this prospectus supplement contains a reference to fees or
expenses paid by "you," "us" or "Prospect Capital," or that "we" will pay fees
or expenses, the Company will pay such fees and expenses out of our net assets
and, consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as an investor
in the Company. However, you will not be required to deliver any
money or otherwise bear personal liability or responsibility for such fees or
expenses.
|
Stockholder
transaction expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Offering
expenses borne by us (as a percentage of offering
price)(2)
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dividend
reinvestment plan expenses(3)
|
|
None
|
|
|
Total
stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering
price)
|
|
%
|
|
|
Annual
expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common
stock)(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
base management fee (___%)(5) and incentive fees payable under Investment
Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital gains and 20% of pre-incentive
fee net investment income) (2.03%)(6)
|
|
%
|
|
|
Interest
payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
%
|
(7)
|
|
Acquired
Fund Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
%
|
(8)
|
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
%
|
(9)
|
|
Total
annual expenses
|
|
|
%
|
(6)(9)
|
Example
The
following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of cumulative expenses
we would pay out of net assets and that you would indirectly bear over various
periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In
calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed that our annual
operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above and
that we pay the stockholder transaction costs shown in the table
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You
would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5%
annual return
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
While
the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance
will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The income
incentive fee under our Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital
Management would be zero at the 5% annual return assumption required by the SEC
for this table, since no incentive fee is paid until the annual return exceeds
7%. This illustration assumes that we will not realize any capital gains
computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation
in any of the indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an
incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors
after such expenses, would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes
reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at NAV per share, participants
in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common
stock determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to
a participant by the market price per share of our common stock at the close of
trading on the valuation date for the dividend. See "Dividend Reinvestment Plan"
in the accompanying prospectus for additional information regarding our dividend
reinvestment plan.
This
example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a
representation of our future expenses. Actual expenses (including the cost of
debt, if any, and other expenses) may be greater or less than those
shown.
|
|
(1
|
)
|
The sales load (underwriting discounts and
commissions) with respect to our common stock sold in this offering, which
is a one time fee, is the only sales load paid in connection with this
offering
.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
The
offering expenses of this offering are estimated to be approximately
$________.
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
The
expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in "other
expenses."
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Net
assets attributable to our common stock equal net assets (i.e., total
assets less liabilities other than liabilities for money borrowed for
investment purposes) at Deceber 31, 2009. See "Capitalization" in this
prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Our
base management fee is 2% of our gross assets (which include any amount
borrowed, i.e., total assets without deduction for any liabilities).
Assuming that we have borrowed $195 million (the size of our credit
facility), the 2% management fee of gross assets equals ____% of net
assets. See "Management — Management Services — Investment Advisory
Agreement" in the accompanying prospectus and footnote 7
below.
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Based
on an annualized level of incentive fee paid during our quarter ended
December 31, 2009, all of which consisted of an income incentive fee. For
a more detailed discussion of the calculation of the two-part incentive
fee, see "Management — Management Services — Investment Advisory
Agreement" in the accompanying prospectus.
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
We
may borrow additional money before and after the proceeds of this offering
are substantially invested. After this offering, we will have an increased
amount available for us under our $195 million extended credit facility
and we will continue to seek additional lenders to upsize the facility to
up to $250 million. For more information, see "Risk Factors — Risks
Relating To Our Business — Changes in interest rates may affect
our
|
|
|
|
cost
of capital and net investment income" and "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of
Operations — Operating Expenses — Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources" in the accompanying prospectus. The table above assumes
that we have borrowed $195 million under our credit facility, which is the
maximum amount currently available under the credit facility. If we do not
borrow amounts following this offering, our base management fee, as a
percentage of net assets attributable to common stock, will decrease from
the percentage shown in the table above, as borrowings will not represent
a portion of our overall assets.
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
The
Company's stockholders indirectly bear the expenses of underlying
investment companies in which the Company invests. This amount includes
the fees and expenses of investment companies in which the Company is
invested in as of December 31, 2009. When applicable, fees and expenses
are based on historic fees and expenses for the investment companies and
for those investment companies with little or no operating history, fees
and expenses are based on expected fees and expenses stated in the
investment companies' prospectus or other similar communication without
giving effect to any performance. Future fees and expenses for certain
investment companies may be substantially higher or lower because certain
fees and expenses are based on the performance of the investment
companies, which may fluctuate over time. The amount of the Company's
average net assets used in calculating this percentage was based on
average monthly net assets of approximately $637 million for the six
months ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
"Other
expense" is based on our annualized expenses during our quarter ended
December 31, 2009, as adjusted for the increased costs anticipated in
connection with the extended credit facility. See "Management — Management
Services — Administration Agreement" in the accompanying
prospectus.
|
RISK
FACTORS
Investing
in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully
consider the risks described below and in the accompanying prospectus, together
with all of the other information included in this prospectus supplement and in
the accompanying prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in
our common stock. The risks set forth below and in the accompanying prospectus
are not the only risks we face. If any of the adverse events or conditions
described below or in the accompanying prospectus occur, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In
such case, our NAV and the trading price of our common stock could decline, we
could reduce or eliminate our dividend and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Recent
developments may increase the risks associated with our business and an
investment in us.
The
U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high level of volatility,
disruption and distress, which was exacerbated by the failure of several major
financial institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the U.S.
economy has entered a recession, which is likely to be severe and prolonged.
Similar conditions have occurred in the financial markets and economies of
numerous other countries and could worsen, both in the U.S. and globally. These
conditions have raised the level of many of the risks described in the
accompanying prospectus and could have an adverse effect on our portfolio
companies as well as on our business, financial condition, results of
operations, dividend payments, credit facility, access to capital, valuation of
our assets (including our NAV) and our stock price.
If
we sell common stock at a discount to our NAV per share, stockholders who do not
participate in such sale will experience immediate dilution in an amount that
may be material.
We
have obtained approval from our stockholders for us to be able to sell an
unlimited number of shares of our common stock at any level of discount from NAV
per share in certain circumstances during the one-year period ending December
11, 2010 as described in the accompanying prospectus. The issuance or sale by us
of shares of our common stock at a discount to net asset value poses a risk of
dilution to our stockholders. In particular, stockholders who do not purchase
additional shares at or below the discounted price in proportion to their
current ownership will experience an immediate decrease in NAV per share (as
well as in the aggregate NAV of their shares if they do not participate at all).
These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately greater decrease in
their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than the
increase we experience in our assets, potential earning power and voting
interests from such issuance or sale. In addition, such sales may adversely
affect the price at which our common stock trades. For additional information
about recent sales below NAV per share, see "Recent Sales of Common Stock Below
Net Asset Value" in this prospectus supplement and for additional information
and hypothetical examples of these risks, see "Sales of Common Stock Below Net
Asset Value" in this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying
prospectus.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
The
net proceeds from the sale of _____ shares of our common stock in this offering
will be $_______ (or $_______ if the over-allotment is exercised in full) after
deducting estimated offering expenses of approximately $_______ payable by
us.
We
expect to use the net proceeds from this offering initially to maintain balance
sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under our credit facility,
investments in high quality short-term debt instruments or a combination
thereof, and thereafter to make long-term investments in accordance with our
investment objective.
We
are currently pursuing multiple investment opportunities, including purchases of
portfolios from private and public companies, as well as originations and
secondary purchases of particular securities. There can be no assurance that we
will successfully consummate any investment opportunity we are currently
pursuing. Motivated sellers, including commercial finance companies, hedge
funds, other business development companies, total return swap counterparties,
banks, collateralized loan obligation funds, and other entities, are suffering
from excess leverage, and we believe we are well positioned to capitalize as
potential buyers of such assets at attractive prices. If any of these
opportunities are consummated, there can be no assurance that investors will
share our view of valuation or that any assets acquired will not be subject to
future write downs, each of which could have an adverse effect on our stock
price.
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31,
2009:
|
|
·
|
|
on
an actual basis;
|
|
|
·
|
|
on
an as adjusted basis giving effect to our distribution of shares in
connection with our dividend reinvestment plan on January 25, 2010 and
additional borrowings;
|
|
|
·
|
|
on
an as further adjusted basis giving effect to the transactions noted in
the prior column and the s
ale of _______
shares in this offering, at a net price of $ _______ per share
after deducting estimated offering expenses of approximately $_______
payable by us, and our receipt of the estimated net proceeds from this
offering
.
|
This
table should be read in conjunction with "Use of Proceeds" and our "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
our financial statements and notes thereto included in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
Adjusted for Stock Issuances and Additional Borrowings After
December
31,2009
|
|
|
As
further Adjusted for this Offering
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except shares and per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Long-term
debt, including current maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
under senior credit facility
(1)
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
owed to affiliates
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
|
Total
long-term debt
|
|
|
17,412
|
|
|
|
32,412
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (100,000,000 common shares authorized;
63,349,746 shares outstanding actual, 63,586,731(2) shares
outstanding as adjusted for stock issuances in connection with our
dividend reinvestment plan completed after December 31, 2009 and
_______
shares outstanding
as further adjusted for this offering)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
741,520
|
|
|
|
744,415
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
(distributions in excess of) net investment income
|
|
|
(14,326
|
)
|
|
|
(14,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
realized losses on investments
|
|
|
(104,279
|
)
|
|
|
(104,279
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
637,477
|
|
|
|
640,373
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capitalization
|
|
$
|
654,889
|
|
|
$
|
672,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
As
of December 31, 2009, we had $10 million of borrowings outstanding under
our credit facility. As of February 25, 2010, we had
$25.0 million of borrowings under our credit facility, representing a
$15.0 million increase in borrowing subsequent to December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Includes
236,985 shares of our common stock issued on January 25, 2010 in
connection with our dividend reinvestment
plan.
|
RECENT
SALES OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At
our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on February 12, 2009 and our 2009
annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our stockholders
approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock
at any level of discount to NAV per share during the twelve-month period
following such approval. Accordingly, we may make additional offerings of our
common stock without any limitation on the total amount of dilution to
stockholders. See "Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value" in this
supplement and in the base prospectus. Pursuant to this authority, we have made
the following offerings:
|
|
|
Price
Per Share
to
Investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Net Asset
Value
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 18,
2009
|
|
$
|
8.20
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
April 27,
2009
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
3,680,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.15
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
May 26,
2009
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
7,762,500
|
|
|
$
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
%
|
|
July 7,
2009
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
5,175,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
|
August 20,
2009
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
3,449,686
|
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
September 24,
2009
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
2,807,111
|
|
|
$
|
11.36
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
DISTRIBUTIONS
AND PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
We
have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly distributions to our
stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. Our
distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors. Certain
amounts of the quarterly distributions may from time to time be paid out of our
capital rather than from earnings for the quarter as a result of our deliberate
planning or by accounting reclassifications.
In
order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at least 90% of our
ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized
net long-term capital losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on RICs, we are
required to distribute with respect to each calendar year by January 31 of the
following year an amount at least equal to the sum of
|
|
·
|
98%
of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
·
|
98%
of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period
ending on October 31 of the calendar year, and
|
|
|
·
|
any
ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years that were not
distributed during such years.
|
In
December 2008, our Board of Directors elected to retain excess profits generated
in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and pay a 4% excise tax on such retained
earnings. We paid $533,000 for the excise tax with the filing of our tax return
in March 2009.
In
addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized net capital gains
(which we define as net long-term capital gains in excess of short-term capital
losses), if any, at least annually, out of the assets legally available for such
distributions, we may decide in the future to retain such capital gains for
investment. In such event, the consequences of our retention of net capital
gains are as described under "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations"
in the accompanying prospectus. We can offer no assurance that we will achieve
results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue
senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so
causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940
Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our
borrowings.
We
maintain an "opt out" dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As
a result, if we declare a dividend, then stockholders' cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they
specifically "opt out" of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash
dividends. Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock are
subject to the same U.S. Federal, state and local tax consequences as are
stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in cash. See "Dividend
Reinvestment Plan" in the accompanying prospectus. The tax consequences of
distributions to stockholders are described in the accompanying prospectus under
the label "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations" in the accompanying
prospectus. To the extent prudent and practicable, we intend to declare and pay
dividends on a quarterly basis.
With
respect to the dividends paid to stockholders, income from origination,
structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront fees associated with
investments in portfolio companies were treated as taxable income and
accordingly, distributed to stockholders. During the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, we paid total dividends of approximately $56.1 million. For the first and
second quarters of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, we paid total
distributions of approximately $22.3 million and $25.9 million,
respectively.
Tax
characteristics of all distributions will be reported to stockholders, as
appropriate, on Form 1099-DIV after the end of the year. Our ability to pay
distributions could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
Our
common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
"PSEC." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our NAV per
share of common stock and the high and low closing prices per share of our
common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our common stock
historically trades at prices both above and below its NAV. There can be no
assurance, however, that such premium or discount, as applicable, to NAV will be
maintained. Common stock of business development companies, like that of
closed-end investment companies, frequently trades at a discount to current
NAV. In the past, our common stock has traded at a discount to our
NAV. The risk that our common stock may continue to trade at a discount to our
NAV is separate and distinct from the risk that our NAV per share may
decline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
(Discount)
of
High to
|
|
|
Premium
(Discount)
of
Low to
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
15.15
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.280
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.300
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.340
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
14.86
|
|
|
$
|
16.77
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
|
|
18.79
|
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.385
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
15.18
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3875
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.390
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
15.08
|
|
|
$
|
18.68
|
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
14.58
|
|
|
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
11.22
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.395
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
14.15
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
13.55
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.400
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
16.12
|
|
|
|
13.18
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40125
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
$
|
11.12
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4025
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(56.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40375
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
14.19
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40625
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.82
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4075
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
12.31
|
|
|
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40875
|
|
|
Third
quarter (to 2/25/10)
|
|
|
(3
|
)(4)
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net
asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant
quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the
date of the high or low sales price. The NAVs shown are based on
outstanding shares at the end of each period.
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
The
High/Low Stock Price is calculated as of the closing price on a given day
in the applicable quarter.
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Our
most recently determined NAV per share was $10.06 as of December 31, 2009
($10.07 on an as adjusted basis solely to give effect to our issuance of
common stock on January 25, 2010 in connection with our dividend
reinvestment plan). NAV as of March 31, 2010 may be higher or lower than
$10.07 based on potential changes in valuations as of March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
NAV
has not yet been finally determined for any day after December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
The
dividend for the third quarter of 2010 will be declared in March
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On
________, 2010, the last reported sales price of our common stock was
$________ per share.
|
|
|
|
|
As
of ________, 2010, we had approximately ________ stockholders
of record.
|
|
|
|
|
The
below table sets forth each class of our outstanding securities as of
________, 2010
|
|
(1)
Title of Class
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
Amount
Held by
Registrant
or for
its
Account
|
|
(4)
Amount
Outstanding
Exclusive
of Amount
Shown
Under(3)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
________
|
SALES
OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At
our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on February 12, 2009 and our 2009
annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our stockholders
approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock
at any level of discount from net asset value (NAV) per share during the
twelve-month period following such approval. In order to sell shares pursuant to
this authorization a majority of our directors who have no financial interest in
the sale and a majority of our independent directors must (a) find that the sale
is in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders, and (b)
in consultation with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a
good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior to the first
solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase such shares,
or immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price at which
such shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of such shares, less any distributing commission or
discount. Any offering of common stock below NAV per share will be
designed to raise capital for investment in accordance with our investment
objective.
In
making a determination that an offering below NAV per share is in our and our
stockholders' best interests, our Board of Directors would consider a variety of
factors including:
|
|
·
|
The
effect that an offering below NAV per share would have on our
stockholders, including the potential dilution they would experience as a
result of the offering;
|
|
|
·
|
The
amount per share by which the offering price per share and the net
proceeds per share are less than the most recently determined NAV per
share;
|
|
|
·
|
The
relationship of recent market prices of par common stock to NAV per share
and the potential impact of the offering on the market price per share of
our common stock;
|
|
|
·
|
Whether
the estimated offering price would closely approximate the market value of
our shares;
|
|
|
·
|
The
potential market impact of being able to raise capital during the current
financial market difficulties;
|
|
|
·
|
The
nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
·
|
The
anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and availability of
investments; and
|
|
|
·
|
The
leverage available to us.
|
Our
Board of Directors would also consider the fact that sales of common stock at a
discount will benefit our Advisor as the Advisor will earn additional investment
management fees on the proceeds of such offerings, as it would from the offering
of any other securities of the Company or from the offering of common stock at
premium to NAV per share.
We
will not sell shares under a prospectus supplement to the registration statement
or current post-effective amendment thereto of which this prospectus forms a
part (the "current registration statement") if the cumulative dilution to our
NAV per share from offerings under the current registration statement exceeds
15%. This limit would be measured separately for each offering
pursuant to the current amendment by calculating the percentage dilution or
accretion to aggregate NAV from that offering and then summing the percentage
from each offering. For example, if our most recently determined NAV at the time
of the first offering is $10.07 and we have 63.59 million shares outstanding,
sale of 16 million shares at net proceeds to us of $5.04 per share (a 50%
discount) would produce dilution of 10.04%. If we subsequently determined that
our NAV per share increased to $11.00 on the then
79.59
million shares outstanding and then made an additional offering, we could, for
example, sell approximately an additional 8.759 million shares at net proceeds
to us of $5.50 per share, which would produce dilution of 4.96%, before we would
reach the aggregate 15% limit. If we file a new post-effective amendment, the
threshold would reset.
Sales
by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose potential risks for our
existing stockholders whether or not they participate in the offering, as well
as for new investors who participate in the offering.
The
following three headings and accompanying tables will explain and provide
hypothetical examples on the impact of an offering at a price less than NAV per
share on three different set of investors:
|
|
·
|
existing
shareholders who do not purchase any shares in the
offering
|
|
|
·
|
existing
shareholders who purchase a relatively small amount of shares in the
offering or a relatively large amount of shares in the
offering
|
|
|
·
|
new
investors who become shareholders by purchasing shares in the
offering.
|
Impact
On Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the Offering
Our
existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering below NAV per share
or who do not buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower
price we obtain in the offering (after expenses and commissions) face the
greatest potential risks. These stockholders will experience an immediate
decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV of the shares they hold and their
NAV per share. These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately
greater decrease in their participation in our earnings and assets and their
voting power than the increase we will experience in our assets, potential
earning power and voting interests due to the offering. These stockholders may
also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often
reflects to some degree announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV
per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increase.
The
following chart illustrates the level of NAV dilution that would be experienced
by a stockholder who does not participate in the offering. NAV has
not been finally determined for any day after December 31, 2009. The table below
is shown based upon the pro-forma NAV calculated by us taking into account the
effects on our NAV per share of our issuance of shares in connection with our
dividend reinvestment plan on January 25, 2010. For purposes of
illustration, the table below assumes that our December 31, 2009 NAV per share
has been increased to 10.07 per share as a result of the foregoing transaction.
The following example assumes a sale of 7,000,000 shares at a sales price to the
public of $10.00 with a 5.0% underwriting discount and commissions and $350,000
of expenses ($9.45 per share net). It is not possible to predict the
level of market price decline that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Decrease
to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
63,586,731
|
|
|
|
70,586,731
|
|
|
|
11.01
|
%
|
|
NAV
per Share
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)%
|
|
Dilution
to Nonparticipating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
by Stockholder A
|
|
|
63,587
|
|
|
|
63,587
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
Percentage
Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(9.92
|
)%
|
|
Total
NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
640,375
|
|
|
$
|
636,460
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)%
|
|
Total
Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.07 per
Share)
|
|
$
|
640,375
|
|
|
$
|
646,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
per Share Held by Stockholder A after offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.07 per Share on
Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.82
|
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution
per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided by Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)%
|
Impact
On Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in the Offering
Our
existing stockholders who participate in the offering or who buy additional
shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the
offering (after expenses and commissions) will experience the same types of NAV
dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at a lower level, to the
extent they purchase less than the same percentage of the discounted offering as
their interest in our shares immediately prior to the offering. The level of NAV
dilution will decrease as the number of shares such stockholders purchase
increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than such percentage will
experience NAV dilution but will, in contrast to existing stockholders who
purchase less than their proportionate share of the offering, experience an
increase (often called accretion) in NAV per share over their investment per
share and will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in their
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than our
increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests due to the
offering. The level of accretion will increase as the excess number of shares
such stockholder purchases increases. Even a stockholder who overparticipates
will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted
offerings in which such stockholder does not participate, in which case such a
stockholder will experience NAV dilution as described above in such subsequent
offerings. These stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price
of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or potential
increases and decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more pronounced
as the size of the offering and level of discounts increases.
The
following chart illustrates the level of dilution and accretion in the
hypothetical 20% discount offering from the prior chart (Example 3) for a
stockholder that acquires shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share of
the offering (i.e., 3,500 shares, which is 0.05% of an offering of 7,000,000
shares) rather than its 0.10% proportionate share and (2) 150% of such
percentage (i.e. 10,500 shares, which is 0.15% of an offering of 7,000,000
shares rather than its 0.10% proportionate share). NAV has not been
finally determined for any day after December 31, 2009. The table below is shown
based upon the pro-forma NAV calculated by us taking into account the effects on
our NAV per share of our issuance of shares in connection with our dividend
reinvestment plan on January 25, 2010. For purposes of illustration,
the table below assumes that our December 31, 2009 NAV per share has been
increased to 10.07 per share as a result of the foregoing transaction. The
following example assumes a sale of 7,000,000 shares at a sales price to the
public of $10.00 with a 5.0% underwriting discount and commissions and $350,000
of expenses ($9.45 per share net). It is not possible to predict the
level of market price decline that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase
to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
63,586,731
|
|
|
|
70,586,731
|
|
|
|
11.01
|
%
|
|
|
70,586,731
|
|
|
|
11.01
|
%
|
|
NAV
per Share
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)%
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)%
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
to Participating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
by Stockholder A
|
|
|
63,587
|
|
|
|
67,087
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
74,087
|
|
|
|
16.51
|
%
|
|
Percentage
Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(4.96
|
)%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
|
Total
NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
640,376
|
|
|
$
|
671,493
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
$
|
741,558
|
|
|
|
15.80
|
%
|
|
Total
Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.07
per
Share on Shares held Prior to Sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
675,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
745,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV
Less
Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to
be
$10.07 on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)%
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)%
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV
per
Share Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided
by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.57
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.51
|
)%
|
Impact
On New Investors
Investors
who are not currently stockholders and who participate in an offering below NAV
but whose investment per share is greater than the resulting NAV per share due
to selling compensation and expenses paid by the issuer will experience an
immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and their NAV per
share compared to the price they pay for their shares. Investors who are not
currently stockholders and who participate in an offering below NAV per share
and whose investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per share due
to selling compensation and expenses paid by the issuer being significantly less
than the discount per share will experience an immediate increase in the NAV of
their shares and their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. These investors will experience a disproportionately greater
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than our
increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests. These
investors will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make additional
discounted offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in
which case such new stockholder will experience dilution as described above in
such subsequent offerings. These investors may also experience a decline in the
market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or
potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more
pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts
increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution or
accretion for new investors that will be experienced by a new investor who
purchases the same percentage (0.10%) of the shares in the offering as the
stockholder in the prior examples held immediately prior to the offering. These
stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares,
which often reflects to some degree announced or potential increases and
decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size
of the offering and level of discounts increases.
NAV has not
been finally determined for any day after December 31, 2009. The table below is
shown based upon the pro-forma NAV calculated by us taking into account the
effects on our NAV per share of our issuance of shares in connection with our
dividend reinvestment plan on January 25, 2010. For purposes of
illustration, the table below assumes that our December 31, 2009 NAV per share
has been increased to 10.07 per share as a result of the foregoing transaction.
The following example assumes a sale of 7,000,000 shares at a sales price to the
public of $10.00 with a 5.0% underwriting discount and commissions and $350,000
of expenses ($9.45 per share net). It is not possible to predict the
level of market price decline that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase
to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
63,586,731
|
|
|
|
70,586,731
|
|
|
|
11.01
|
%
|
|
NAV
per Share
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)%
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held
by Investor A
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Held by Investor A
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
NAV Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
70,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion
per Share Held by Investor A (NAV per Share Less Investment per
Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
We
are selling the shares of our common stock under this prospectus supplement
______. Subject to the terms of ______, we have agreed to sell
______ shares of our common stock at a price of $______ per share in
cash.
We
expect to have our transfer agent deliver the shares of our common stock after
we receive the payment of the total purchase price therefor in immediately
available funds.
Our
common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
“PSEC.”
We
will bear all of the expenses that we incur in connection with the offering of
our shares of common stock under this prospectus supplement. We estimate the
total expenses payable by us in connection with the offering will be
approximately $______.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain
legal matters regarding the common stock offered hereby have been passed upon
for the Company by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New
York, and Venable LLP as special Maryland counsel.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO
Seidman LLP is the independent registered public accounting firm for the
Company.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We
have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form N-2, together with all
amendments and related exhibits, under the Securities Act of 1933, with respect
to our common stock offered by this prospectus supplement. The registration
statement contains additional information about us and the common stock being
registered by this prospectus supplement. We file with or submit to the SEC
annual, quarterly and current periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. This
information and the information specifically regarding how we voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities for the period ended June 30, 2009, are
available free of charge by contacting us at 10 East 40th Street, 44th floor,
New York, NY 10016 or by telephone at toll-free (888) 748-0702. You may inspect
and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information, as well as the
registration statement and related exhibits and schedules, at the Public
Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at (202) 551-8090. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports,
proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by
us with the SEC which are available on the SEC's Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements
and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at the following E-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by
writing the SEC's Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
No
dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized to give any
information or to make any representation other than those contained in this
prospectus supplement and, if given or made, such information or representations
must not be relied upon as having been authorized by us. This prospectus
supplement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to
buy any securities in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is
not authorized or in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not
qualified to do so, or
to
any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Neither
the delivery of this prospectus supplement nor any sale made hereunder shall,
under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in
our affairs or that information contained herein is correct as of any time
subsequent to the date hereof.
$500,000,000
Prospect
Capital Corporation
March
4, 2010