| Debt
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
1.Description of Business
Bruker Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“Bruker” or the “Company”), is a designer and manufacturer of high-performance scientific instruments and analytical and diagnostic solutions that enable its customers to explore life and materials at microscopic, molecular and cellular levels. Many of the Company’s products are used to detect, measure and visualize structural characteristics of chemical, biological and industrial material samples. The Company’s products address the rapidly evolving needs of a diverse array of customers in life science research, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, applied markets, cell biology, clinical research, microbiology, in-vitro diagnostics, nanotechnology and materials science research.
The Company has two reportable segments, Bruker Scientific Instruments (BSI), which represented approximately 92% of the Company’s revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 93% of the Company’s revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST), which represented the remainder of the Company’s revenues. Within BSI, the Company is organized into three operating segments: the Bruker BioSpin Group, the Bruker CALID Group and the Bruker Nano Group. For financial reporting purposes, the Bruker BioSpin, Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano operating segments are aggregated into the BSI reportable segment because each has similar economic characteristics, production processes, service offerings, types and classes of customers, methods of distribution and regulatory environments.
Bruker BioSpin- The Bruker BioSpin Group manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools based on magnetic resonance technology. The majority of Bruker BioSpin’s revenues are generated by academic and government research customers. Other customers include pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and nonprofit laboratories, as well as chemical, food and beverage, clinical and polymer companies.
Bruker CALID (Chemicals, Applied Markets, Life Science, In-Vitro Diagnostics, Detection)- The Bruker CALID Group designs, manufactures and distributes life science mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry systems, infrared spectroscopy and radiological/nuclear detectors for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRNE) detection in emergency response, homeland security and defense applications, and analytical and process analysis instruments and solutions based on infrared and Raman molecular spectroscopy technologies. Customers of the Bruker CALID Group include pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostics companies, contract research organizations, academic institutions, medical schools, nonprofit or for-profit forensics, agriculture, food and beverage safety, environmental and clinical microbiology laboratories, hospitals and government departments and agencies.
Bruker Nano- The Bruker Nano Group designs, manufactures and distributes advanced X-ray instruments, atomic force microscopy instrumentation, advanced fluorescence optical microscopy instruments, analytical tools for electron microscopes and X-ray metrology, defect-detection equipment for semiconductor process control, handheld, portable and mobile X-ray fluorescence spectrometry instruments and spark optical emission spectroscopy systems. Customers of the Bruker Nano Group include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, governmental customers, nanotechnology companies, semiconductor companies, raw material manufacturers, industrial companies and other businesses involved in materials analysis.
The Company’s BEST reportable segment develops and manufactures superconducting and non-superconducting materials and devices for use in renewable energy, energy infrastructure, healthcare and ‘‘big science’’ research. The segment focuses on metallic low temperature superconductors for use in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear magnetic resonance, fusion energy research and other applications, as well as ceramic high temperature superconductors primarily for energy grid and magnet applications.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated accounts of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial information presented herein does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any other interim period or the full year. Upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, the deferred financing costs related to the Company’s senior note obligations were reclassified as of December 31, 2015 to conform to the current year presentation and had no effect on previously reported net income or cash flows. See Note 7 for additional information regarding the Company’s senior note obligations.
At September 30, 2016, the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates, which are detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, have not changed.
|
|||
2.Stock-Based Compensation
In May 2010, the Bruker Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders. The 2010 Plan provided for the issuance of up to 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2010 Plan allowed a committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. The Compensation Committee had the authority to determine which employees would receive the awards, the amount of the awards and other terms and conditions of any awards. Awards granted under the 2010 Plan typically were made subject to a vesting period of three to five years.
In May 2016, the Bruker Corporation 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2016 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders. With the approval of the 2016 Plan, no further grants will be made under the 2010 Plan. The 2016 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 9,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and permits the grant of awards of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, as well as cash-based awards. The 2016 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine which employees will receive awards, the amount of any awards, and other terms and conditions of such awards. Awards granted under the 2016 Plan typically vest over a period of three to four years.
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense as follows in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
||||
|
Restricted stock units |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Costs of product revenue |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
1.7 |
|
1.4 |
|
4.8 |
|
4.0 |
|
||||
|
Research and development |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the underlying requisite service period of the stock-based award.
Stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock are periodically awarded to executive officers and other employees of the Company subject to a vesting period of three to five years. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Assumptions for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 regarding volatility, expected life, dividend yield and risk-free interest rates are required for the Black-Scholes model and are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
1.23% - 2.05% |
|
1.58% - 1.89% |
|
|
Expected life |
|
5.75 - 7.02 years |
|
6.0 - 6.25 years |
|
|
Volatility |
|
33.57% - 41.60% |
|
36.09% - 52.23% |
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.0% - 0.73% |
|
0.0% |
|
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |
|
4,637,279 |
|
$ |
16.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
254,042 |
|
24.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercised |
|
(799,410 |
) |
13.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Forfeited |
|
(163,037 |
) |
18.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
|
3,928,874 |
|
$ |
17.82 |
|
6.5 |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016 |
|
2,370,900 |
|
$ |
15.92 |
|
5.3 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercisable and expected to vest at September 30, 2016 (a) |
|
3,831,345 |
|
$ |
17.75 |
|
6.4 |
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In addition to the options that are vested at September 30, 2016, the Company expects a portion of the unvested options to vest in the future. Options expected to vest in the future are determined by applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the options that are unvested as of September 30, 2016. |
|
(b) |
The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the positive difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock price of $22.65 on September 30, 2016, or the date of exercises, as appropriate, and the exercise price of the underlying stock options. |
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $9.67 and $7.82 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $10.4 million and $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Restricted stock award activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |
|
243,150 |
|
$ |
18.58 |
|
|
Granted |
|
13,105 |
|
24.80 |
|
|
|
Vested |
|
(81,024 |
) |
17.87 |
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(1,375 |
) |
16.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
|
173,856 |
|
$ |
19.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock vested was $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the each of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Restricted stock unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Granted |
|
8,427 |
|
25.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
|
8,427 |
|
$ |
25.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No restricted stock units vested in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
At September 30, 2016, the Company expects to recognize pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $11.6 million associated with outstanding stock option awards granted under the Company’s stock plans over the weighted average remaining service period of 2.25 years. The Company expects to recognize additional pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $2.9 million associated with outstanding restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s stock plans over the weighted average remaining service period of 2.34 years. The Company also expects to recognize additional pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million associated with outstanding restricted stock units granted under the 2016 Plan over the weighted average remaining service period of 3.68 years.
|
|||
4.Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company applies the following hierarchy to determine the fair value of financial instruments, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement. The levels in the hierarchy are defined as follows:
|
· |
Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
· |
Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
· |
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
The valuation techniques that may be used by the Company to determine the fair value of Level 2 and Level 3 financial instruments are the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and the excess earnings method. The cost approach is based on the amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and presents them within the fair value hierarchy using the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in millions):
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total assets recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
1.3 |
|
— |
|
1.3 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.5 |
|
— |
|
0.5 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of short-term investments, restricted cash, derivative instruments consisting of foreign exchange contracts, commodity contracts, derivatives embedded in certain purchase and sale contracts, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings, accounts payable, contingent consideration and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of the Company’s short-term investments, restricted cash, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. Derivative assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s long-term debt consists principally of a private placement arrangement entered into in 2012 with various fixed interest rates based on the maturity date. The fair value of the long-term fixed interest rate debt, which has been classified as Level 2, was $260.3 million and $252.1 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, based on market and observable sources with similar maturity dates.
Fair value treatment may be elected either upon initial recognition of an eligible asset or liability or, for an existing asset or liability, if an event triggers a new basis of accounting. The Company did not elect to remeasure any of its existing financial assets or liabilities and did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities which originated during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2016 or 2015.
As part of certain historical acquisitions, the Company recorded contingent consideration liabilities that have been classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The contingent consideration represents the estimated fair value of future payments to the former shareholders of applicable acquired companies based on achieving annual revenue and gross margin targets in certain years as specified in the purchase and sale agreements. The Company initially values contingent consideration using a Monte Carlo simulation which models future revenue and costs of goods sold projections and discounts the average results to present value. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, additional contingent consideration of $7.7 million was recognized in earnings related to a recent acquisition within the Bruker Nano Group based upon an increase in forecasted revenue levels for the acquired business for the remainder of 2016 and was recorded within other charges, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
The following table sets forth the changes in contingent consideration liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
Current period additions |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
Current period adjustments |
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2016 |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration recognized in earnings was $0.0 million and $(3.0) million, respectively, and was recorded within other charges, net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
The Company enters into time deposits with varying maturity dates ranging from one to twelve months, as well as call deposits for which the Company has the ability to redeem the invested amounts over a period of 31 to 95 days. The Company has classified these investments within cash and cash equivalents or short-term investments within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets based on the call and maturity dates. As of September 30, 2016 none were classified as cash equivalents outstanding and $162.8 million were classified as short-term investments.
Short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains (losses) excluded from earnings and reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. There were no unrealized gains (losses) recorded during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews its short-term investments to determine if there have been any events that could create an impairment. None were noted for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
|
|||
5.Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
$ |
158.8 |
|
|
Work-in-process |
|
189.9 |
|
131.1 |
|
||
|
Finished goods |
|
99.1 |
|
93.3 |
|
||
|
Demonstration units |
|
37.6 |
|
38.8 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
483.1 |
|
$ |
422.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods include in-transit systems that have been shipped to the Company’s customers, but not yet installed and accepted by the customer. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, inventory-in-transit was $40.6 million and $44.7 million, respectively.
The Company reduces the carrying value of its demonstration inventories for differences between its cost and estimated net realizable value through a charge to cost of product revenue that is based on a number of factors, including the age of the unit, the physical condition of the unit and an assessment of technological obsolescence. Amounts recorded in Cost of Revenue related to the write-down of demonstration units to net realizable value were $4.0 million and $5.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $12.5 million and $15.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
|
|||
6.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
130.6 |
|
|
Foreign currency effect |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2016 |
|
$ |
131.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of intangible assets (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Carrying |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Carrying |
|
||||||
|
Existing technology and related patents |
|
$ |
156.8 |
|
$ |
(109.1 |
) |
$ |
47.7 |
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
$ |
(95.5 |
) |
$ |
59.0 |
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
18.4 |
|
(7.5 |
) |
10.9 |
|
18.4 |
|
(5.9 |
) |
12.5 |
|
||||||
|
Non compete contracts |
|
1.8 |
|
(1.0 |
) |
0.8 |
|
1.8 |
|
(0.6 |
) |
1.2 |
|
||||||
|
Trade names |
|
1.6 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
1.3 |
|
1.6 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
1.4 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
178.6 |
|
(117.9 |
) |
60.7 |
|
176.3 |
|
(102.2 |
) |
74.1 |
|
||||||
|
In-process research and development |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
0.6 |
|
— |
|
0.6 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
178.6 |
|
$ |
(117.9 |
) |
$ |
60.7 |
|
$ |
176.9 |
|
$ |
(102.2 |
) |
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded amortization expense of $5.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively, related to intangible assets subject to amortization. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded amortization expense of $16.2 million and $15.5 million, respectively, related to intangible assets subject to amortization.
|
|||
7.Debt
The Company’s debt obligations as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
US Dollar revolving loan under the 2015 Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
|
US Dollar notes under the Note Purchase Agreement |
|
240.0 |
|
240.0 |
|
||
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs under the Note Purchase Agreement |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
||
|
Capital lease obligations and other loans |
|
1.7 |
|
1.7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total debt |
|
364.9 |
|
265.8 |
|
||
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
(20.2 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
344.7 |
|
$ |
265.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 27, 2015, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement, referred to as the 2015 Credit Agreement, and terminated the prior credit agreement. The 2015 Credit Agreement provides a maximum commitment on the Company’s revolving credit line of $500.0 million and a maturity date of October 2020. Borrowings under the revolving credit line of the 2015 Credit Agreement accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) adjusted LIBOR plus 1.00%, plus margins ranging from 0.00% to 0.30% or (b) LIBOR, plus margins ranging from 0.90% to 1.30%. There is also a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.20%.
Borrowings under the 2015 Credit Agreement are secured by guarantees from certain material subsidiaries, as defined in the 2015 Credit Agreement. The 2015 Credit Agreement also requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios related to maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage. Specifically, the Company’s leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.5 and the Company’s interest coverage ratio cannot be less than 2.5. In addition to the financial ratios, the 2015 Credit Agreement contains negative covenants, including among others, restrictions on liens, indebtedness of the Company and its subsidiaries, asset sales, dividends and transactions with affiliates. Failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default on the 2015 Credit Agreement, which could permit acceleration of the debt and require the Company to prepay the debt before its scheduled due date.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the 2015 Credit Agreement. The Company’s leverage ratio (as defined in the 2015 Credit Agreement) was 1.4 and interest coverage ratio (as defined in the 2015 Credit Agreement) was 15.7.
The following is a summary of the maximum commitments and the net amounts available to the Company under the 2015 Credit Agreement and other lines of credit with various financial institutions located primarily in Germany and Switzerland that are unsecured and typically due upon demand with interest payable monthly, at September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Total Amount |
|
Outstanding |
|
Outstanding |
|
Total Amount |
|
||||
|
2015 Credit Agreement |
|
1.8 |
% |
$ |
500.0 |
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
$ |
374.9 |
|
|
Other lines of credit |
|
— |
|
237.6 |
|
— |
|
129.8 |
|
107.8 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total revolving lines of credit |
|
|
|
$ |
737.6 |
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
$ |
482.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2012, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement, referred to as the Note Purchase Agreement, with a group of accredited institutional investors. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and sold $240.0 million of senior notes, referred to as the Senior Notes, which consist of the following:
|
· |
$20.0 million 3.16% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche A, due January 18, 2017; |
|
· |
$15.0 million 3.74% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche B, due January 18, 2019; |
|
· |
$105.0 million 4.31% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche C, due January 18, 2022; and |
|
· |
$100.0 million 4.46% Series 2012A Senior Notes, Tranche D, due January 18, 2024. |
Under the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company may issue and sell additional senior notes up to an aggregate principal amount of $600 million, subject to certain conditions. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on January 18 and July 18 of each year. The Senior Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries. The Senior Notes rank pari passu in right of repayment with the Company’s other senior unsecured indebtedness. The Company may prepay some or all of the Senior Notes at any time in an amount not less than 10% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes to be prepaid, at a price equal to the sum of (a) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and (b) the applicable make-whole amount, upon not less than 30 and no more than 60 days written notice to the holders of the Senior Notes. In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company may be required to prepay the Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains affirmative covenants, including, without limitation, maintenance of corporate existence, compliance with laws, maintenance of insurance and properties, payment of taxes, addition of subsidiary guarantors and furnishing notices and other information. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains certain restrictive covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur liens, transfer or sell assets, engage in certain mergers and consolidations and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Note Purchase Agreement also includes customary representations and warranties and events of default. In the case of an event of default arising from specified events of bankruptcy or insolvency, all outstanding Senior Notes will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. In the case of payment events of defaults, any holder of Senior Notes affected thereby may declare all Senior Notes held by it due and payable immediately. In the case of any other event of default, a majority of the holders of the Senior Notes may declare all the Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding the Company will not permit (i) its leverage ratio, as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, as of the end of any fiscal quarter to exceed 3.50 to 1.00, (ii) its interest coverage ratio as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement as of the end of any fiscal quarter for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters to be less than 2.50 to 1 or (iii) priority debt at any time to exceed 25% of consolidated net worth, as determined pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Note Purchase Agreement. The Company’s leverage ratio (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) was 1.4 and interest coverage ratio (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) was 15.7.
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which amends the existing guidance to require that debt issuance costs be presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as a reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of as an other asset. The Company adopted ASU 2015-03 on a retrospective basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in debt issuance costs recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related debt liability under the Note Purchase Agreement. The $0.8 million in debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2016 will be amortized over the remaining term of the Note Purchase Agreement. The retrospective adoption resulted in $0.9 million of debt issuance costs being reclassified from other current assets and other non-current assets to a reduction of the carrying value of long-term debt as of December 31, 2015. The Company also adopted ASU No. 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, and elected not to reclassify the debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements for the 2015 Credit Agreement.
|
|||
8.Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Interest Rate Risks
The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to outstanding variable rate debt and adverse movements in the related short-term market rates. The most significant component of the Company’s interest rate risk relates to amounts outstanding under the 2015 Credit Agreement, which totaled $124.0 million at September 30, 2016. The Company currently has a higher level of fixed rate debt than variable rate debt, which limits the exposure to adverse movements in interest rates.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Management
The Company generates a substantial portion of its revenues and expenses in international markets, principally Germany and other countries in the European Union, Switzerland and Japan, which subjects its operations to the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate movement can be positive or negative in any period. The Company periodically enters into foreign exchange contracts in order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in foreign currency have on its monetary transactions. Under these arrangements, the Company typically agrees to purchase a fixed amount of a foreign currency in exchange for a fixed amount of U.S. Dollars or other currencies on specified dates with maturities of less than twelve months. These transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, the instrument is recorded at fair value with the corresponding gains and losses recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The Company had the following notional amounts outstanding under foreign exchange contracts at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in millions):
|
Buy |
|
Notional |
|
Sell |
|
Maturity |
|
Notional |
|
Fair Value of |
|
Fair Value of |
|
|||
|
September 30, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Euro |
|
19.9 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
October 2016 |
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Swiss Francs |
|
6.4 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
October 2016 |
|
6.6 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
6.0 |
|
Israel Shekel |
|
October 2016 |
|
6.0 |
|
— |
|
0.2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Israel Shekel |
|
7.5 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
October 2016 |
|
2.0 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Euro |
|
1.4 |
|
Polish Zloty |
|
January 2017 |
|
1.5 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.3 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
December 31, 2015: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Euro |
|
21.1 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
January 2016 |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Swiss Francs |
|
5.9 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
April 2016 |
|
6.0 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
6.0 |
|
Israel Shekel |
|
April 2016 |
|
6.0 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company periodically enters into purchase and sales contracts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the parties to the transaction. The Company accounts for these transactions by separately valuing the “embedded derivative” component of these contracts. Contracts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the transacting parties amounted to $59.8 million for the delivery of products and $2.8 million for the purchase of products at September 30, 2016 and $59.0 million for the delivery of products and $4.1 million for the purchase of products at December 31, 2015. The changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives are recorded as foreign currency exchange gains/losses within interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Commodity Price Risk Management
The Company has an arrangement with a customer under which it has a firm commitment to deliver copper based superconductors at a fixed price. In order to minimize the volatility that fluctuations in the price of copper have on the Company’s sales of these superconductors, the Company enters into commodity hedge contracts. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had fixed price commodity contracts with notional amounts aggregating $3.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The changes in the fair value of these commodity contracts are recorded within interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
The fair value of the derivative instruments described above is recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets for the periods as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
0.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
||
The impact on net income of unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.3 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
— |
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
— |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.2 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts related to derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded within interest and other income (expense), net in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
|
|||
9.(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, calculated using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be reflected in the tax return. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In addition, the Company accounts for uncertain tax positions that have reached a minimum recognition threshold.
The income tax (benefit) provision for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $(4.0) million and $10.7 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of (9.3)% and 45.3%, respectively. The income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $3.8 million and $17.8 million, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 4.3% and 29.3%, respectively. The decrease in our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily caused by the release of valuation allowances. The decrease in our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily caused by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the closure of certain tax audits, release of valuation allowances and changes in the expected mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions. The Company’s effective tax rate may change over time as the amount or mix of income and taxes changes among the jurisdictions in which the Company is subject to tax.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits, excluding penalties and interest, of approximately $7.3 million and $26.9 million, respectively, of which $6.4 million and $13.0 million, if recognized, would result in a reduction of the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately $0.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was included in other long-term liabilities on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. Penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.9 million and $0.0 million were recorded in the provision for income taxes during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $1.5 million and $1.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company files tax returns in the United States, which include federal, state and local jurisdictions, and many foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company considers Germany, the United States and Switzerland to be its significant tax jurisdictions. The tax years 2009 to 2015 are open tax years in Germany and Switzerland. Tax years 2011 to 2015 remain open for examination in the United States.
The Company asserts that its foreign earnings, with the exception of its foreign earnings that have been previously taxed by the U.S., are indefinitely reinvested. The Company regularly evaluates its assertion that its foreign earnings are indefinitely reinvested. If the cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments held by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are needed to fund operations in the U.S., or the Company otherwise elects to repatriate the unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in the form of dividends or otherwise, or if the shares of the subsidiaries were sold or transferred, the Company would likely be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, net of the impact of any available tax credits, which could result in a higher effective tax rate in the future.
|
|||
10.Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
Lawsuits, claims and proceedings of a nature considered normal to its businesses may be pending from time to time against the Company. The Company believes the outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accruals recorded for such potential contingencies were immaterial to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Korea Fair Trade Commission (“KFTC”) has conducted an investigation into improper bidding by Bruker Korea Co., Ltd. and several other companies in connection with bids for sales of X-ray systems in 2010 and 2012. Three of the bids under investigation involved Bruker Korea. The Company cooperated fully with the KFTC regarding this matter. In September 2016, the KFTC fined Bruker Korea approximately $15,000 and referred the matter for criminal prosecution. The potential range of penalties which may arise as a result of any criminal or other proceedings which may be brought by other Korean government agencies against the Company or its subsidiaries operating in Korea involving this matter could include the imposition of a criminal fine and a suspension of all or a portion of the Company’s operations from bidding for or conducting sales to Korean governmental agencies for a period of time. At this time the Company cannot reasonably assess the timing or outcome of these matters or their effect, if any, on the Company’s business or results of operations. Sales to customers in Korea were approximately 2% of the Company’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Letters of Credit and Guarantees
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had bank guarantees of $130.9 million and $137.7 million, respectively, related primarily to customer advances. These arrangements guarantee the refund of advance payments received from customers in the event that the merchandise is not delivered or warranty obligations are not fulfilled in compliance with the terms of the contract. These guarantees affect the availability of the Company’s lines of credit.
|
|||
12.Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests represent the minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the Company’s majority owned subsidiaries. The following table sets forth the changes in noncontrolling interests (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
Net income |
|
0.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
2.7 |
|
||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
||||
|
Cash payments to noncontrolling interests |
|
(0.7 |
) |
— |
|
(0.7 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
13.Other Charges, Net
The components of other charges, net were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Information technology transformation costs |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
2.8 |
|
3.0 |
|
6.4 |
|
5.3 |
|
||||
|
Pension settlement charge |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
10.2 |
|
||||
|
Professional fees incurred in connection with internal investigation |
|
— |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
0.4 |
|
||||
|
Acquisition-related charges (benefits) |
|
0.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
8.1 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
||||
|
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
— |
|
2.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
4.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other charges, net |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In recent years, the Company has been undertaking productivity improvement initiatives in an effort to better optimize its operations. These restructuring initiatives have included the divestiture of certain non-core businesses, outsourcing of various manufacturing activities, transferring or ceasing operations at certain facilities, and an overall right-sizing within the Company based on the current business environment.
The Company recorded total restructuring charges during the three months ended September 30, 2016 of $5.3 million related to these initiatives, all within the BSI Segment. These charges consisted of $0.3 million of inventory provisions for excess inventory, $4.6 million of severance costs and $0.4 million of exit related costs, such as professional service and facility exit charges. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $2.5 million as a component of cost of revenue and $2.8 million as a component of other charges, net in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The Company recorded total restructuring charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $12.8 million related to these initiatives, all within the BSI Segment. These charges consisted of $1.4 million of inventory provisions for excess inventory, $7.9 million of severance costs and $3.5 million of exit related costs, such as professional service and facility exit charges. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $6.4 million as a component of cost of revenue and $6.4 million as a component of other charges, net in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
The Company commenced a restructuring initiative in 2015 within the Bruker BioSpin Group, which was developed as a result of a revenue decline that occurred during the second half of 2014 and continued during the first half of 2015. This initiative was intended to improve Bruker BioSpin Group’s operating results. Restructuring actions resulted in a reduction of employee headcount within the Bruker BioSpin Group of approximately 9%. Included in the total restructuring charges discussed above are restructuring expenses related to this initiative recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $3.3 million of severance and exit costs, of which $2.2 million was recorded as a component of cost of revenue and $1.1 million as a component of other charges, net in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. This restructuring initiative also included the closure and consolidation of a Bruker BioSpin Group manufacturing facility. From inception of this restructuring initiative in the second quarter of 2015, cumulative restructuring expenses and other one-time charges recorded have been $19.5 million, consisting of $4.2 million of inventory write-downs and asset impairments and $15.3 million of severance and exit costs. As of September 30, 2016, expenses incurred under this restructuring initiative were substantially complete.
The Company commenced a restructuring initiative in 2016 to address lower demand in the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups as a result of weakness in European academic funding and ongoing weakness in several of the industrial end market segments that affect the Bruker Nano Group. This initiative is intended to improve the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Group operating results in response to these market conditions. Restructuring actions will result in a reduction of approximately 125 employees within the Bruker CALID and Bruker Nano Groups. Included in the total restructuring charges discussed above are restructuring expenses related to this initiative of $5.4 million for severance and exit costs, of which $3.0 million was recorded as a component of cost of revenue and $2.4 million as a component of other charges, net, and $0.7 million for inventory write-down and asset impairment charges related to the closure and consolidation of manufacturing facilities, of which $0.5 million was recorded as a component of cost of revenue and $0.2 million as a component of other charges, net in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Total restructuring and other one-time charges related to this initiative in 2016 and 2017 are expected to be between $11.0 and $13.0 million, of which $10.0 to $11.5 million relate to employee separation and facility exit costs and $1.0 to $1.5 million relate to estimated inventory write-downs and asset impairments.
The following table sets forth the changes in restructuring reserves for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
|
|
Total |
|
Severance |
|
Exit Costs |
|
Provisions |
|
||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
12.8 |
|
7.9 |
|
3.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
||||
|
Cash payments |
|
(16.7 |
) |
(12.5 |
) |
(3.3 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
||||
|
Other, non-cash adjustments and foreign currency effect |
|
(3.2 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Balance at September 30, 2016 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
14.Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
The components of interest and other income (expense), net, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
$ |
(9.4 |
) |
$ |
(9.2 |
) |
|
Exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions |
|
— |
|
(2.1 |
) |
(1.6 |
) |
(5.4 |
) |
||||
|
Loss on disposal of product line |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||
|
Other |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Interest and other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
$ |
(11.1 |
) |
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
15.Business Segment Information
The Company has two reportable segments, BSI and BEST, as discussed in Note 1 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Revenue and operating income by reportable segment are presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
BSI |
|
$ |
361.5 |
|
$ |
366.6 |
|
$ |
1,057.6 |
|
$ |
1,060.3 |
|
|
BEST |
|
35.5 |
|
32.9 |
|
91.2 |
|
91.2 |
|
||||
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
(3.1 |
) |
(3.4 |
) |
(7.8 |
) |
(5.9 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
393.9 |
|
$ |
396.1 |
|
$ |
1,141.0 |
|
$ |
1,145.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
BSI |
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
$ |
95.3 |
|
$ |
68.2 |
|
|
BEST |
|
2.7 |
|
2.5 |
|
4.1 |
|
6.1 |
|
||||
|
Corporate, eliminations and other (b) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
0.9 |
|
0.7 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments. |
|
(b) |
Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments. |
Total assets by reportable segment are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
BSI |
|
$ |
1,780.6 |
|
$ |
1,714.4 |
|
|
BEST |
|
21.5 |
|
79.1 |
|
||
|
Eliminations and other (a) |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(63.5 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,797.9 |
|
$ |
1,730.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Assets not allocated to the reportable segments and eliminations of intercompany transactions. |
|
|||
16.Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory. The new standard requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory) when the transfer occurs. This is a change from existing GAAP which prohibits recognition of current and deferred income taxes until the asset is sold to a third party. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard, including which period to adopt, and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-16 will have on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Stock Compensation - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The new standard simplifies accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences and the classification of the tax impact on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard, including which period to adopt, and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 will have on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases. The new standard supersedes present U.S. GAAP guidance on leases and requires substantially all leases to be reported on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, as well as additional disclosures. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard, including which period to adopt, and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 will have on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The new guidance eliminates the measurement of inventory at market value, and inventory will now be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The ASU defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. ASU No. 2015-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this standard, including which period to adopt, and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU No. 2015-11 will have on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements under ASC Topic 605. The new guidance was the result of a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop common revenue standards for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of the new guidance is that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB elected to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted as of the previous effective date of December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact the new guidance may have on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
|
|||
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense as follows in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
||||
|
Restricted stock units |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense as follows in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Costs of product revenue |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
1.7 |
|
1.4 |
|
4.8 |
|
4.0 |
|
||||
|
Research and development |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 regarding volatility, expected life, dividend yield and risk-free interest rates are required for the Black-Scholes model and are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
1.23% - 2.05% |
|
1.58% - 1.89% |
|
|
Expected life |
|
5.75 - 7.02 years |
|
6.0 - 6.25 years |
|
|
Volatility |
|
33.57% - 41.60% |
|
36.09% - 52.23% |
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.0% - 0.73% |
|
0.0% |
|
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |
|
4,637,279 |
|
$ |
16.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
254,042 |
|
24.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercised |
|
(799,410 |
) |
13.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Forfeited |
|
(163,037 |
) |
18.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
|
3,928,874 |
|
$ |
17.82 |
|
6.5 |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016 |
|
2,370,900 |
|
$ |
15.92 |
|
5.3 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercisable and expected to vest at September 30, 2016 (a) |
|
3,831,345 |
|
$ |
17.75 |
|
6.4 |
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In addition to the options that are vested at September 30, 2016, the Company expects a portion of the unvested options to vest in the future. Options expected to vest in the future are determined by applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the options that are unvested as of September 30, 2016. |
|
(b) |
The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the positive difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock price of $22.65 on September 30, 2016, or the date of exercises, as appropriate, and the exercise price of the underlying stock options. |
Restricted stock award activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |
|
243,150 |
|
$ |
18.58 |
|
|
Granted |
|
13,105 |
|
24.80 |
|
|
|
Vested |
|
(81,024 |
) |
17.87 |
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(1,375 |
) |
16.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
|
173,856 |
|
$ |
19.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Granted |
|
8,427 |
|
25.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
|
8,427 |
|
$ |
25.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and presents them within the fair value hierarchy using the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in millions):
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total assets recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
0.2 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
1.3 |
|
— |
|
1.3 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.5 |
|
— |
|
0.5 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the changes in contingent consideration liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
Current period additions |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
Current period adjustments |
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2016 |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
$ |
158.8 |
|
|
Work-in-process |
|
189.9 |
|
131.1 |
|
||
|
Finished goods |
|
99.1 |
|
93.3 |
|
||
|
Demonstration units |
|
37.6 |
|
38.8 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
483.1 |
|
$ |
422.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The following table sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
130.6 |
|
|
Foreign currency effect |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2016 |
|
$ |
131.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of intangible assets (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Carrying |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Carrying |
|
||||||
|
Existing technology and related patents |
|
$ |
156.8 |
|
$ |
(109.1 |
) |
$ |
47.7 |
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
$ |
(95.5 |
) |
$ |
59.0 |
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
18.4 |
|
(7.5 |
) |
10.9 |
|
18.4 |
|
(5.9 |
) |
12.5 |
|
||||||
|
Non compete contracts |
|
1.8 |
|
(1.0 |
) |
0.8 |
|
1.8 |
|
(0.6 |
) |
1.2 |
|
||||||
|
Trade names |
|
1.6 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
1.3 |
|
1.6 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
1.4 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
178.6 |
|
(117.9 |
) |
60.7 |
|
176.3 |
|
(102.2 |
) |
74.1 |
|
||||||
|
In-process research and development |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
0.6 |
|
— |
|
0.6 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
178.6 |
|
$ |
(117.9 |
) |
$ |
60.7 |
|
$ |
176.9 |
|
$ |
(102.2 |
) |
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The Company’s debt obligations as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
US Dollar revolving loan under the 2015 Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
|
US Dollar notes under the Note Purchase Agreement |
|
240.0 |
|
240.0 |
|
||
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs under the Note Purchase Agreement |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
||
|
Capital lease obligations and other loans |
|
1.7 |
|
1.7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total debt |
|
364.9 |
|
265.8 |
|
||
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
(20.2 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
344.7 |
|
$ |
265.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the maximum commitments and the net amounts available to the Company under the 2015 Credit Agreement and other lines of credit with various financial institutions located primarily in Germany and Switzerland that are unsecured and typically due upon demand with interest payable monthly, at September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Total Amount |
|
Outstanding |
|
Outstanding |
|
Total Amount |
|
||||
|
2015 Credit Agreement |
|
1.8 |
% |
$ |
500.0 |
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
$ |
374.9 |
|
|
Other lines of credit |
|
— |
|
237.6 |
|
— |
|
129.8 |
|
107.8 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total revolving lines of credit |
|
|
|
$ |
737.6 |
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
$ |
482.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The Company had the following notional amounts outstanding under foreign exchange contracts at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in millions):
|
Buy |
|
Notional |
|
Sell |
|
Maturity |
|
Notional |
|
Fair Value of |
|
Fair Value of |
|
|||
|
September 30, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Euro |
|
19.9 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
October 2016 |
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Swiss Francs |
|
6.4 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
October 2016 |
|
6.6 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
6.0 |
|
Israel Shekel |
|
October 2016 |
|
6.0 |
|
— |
|
0.2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Israel Shekel |
|
7.5 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
October 2016 |
|
2.0 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Euro |
|
1.4 |
|
Polish Zloty |
|
January 2017 |
|
1.5 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.3 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
December 31, 2015: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Euro |
|
21.1 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
January 2016 |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Swiss Francs |
|
5.9 |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
April 2016 |
|
6.0 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
6.0 |
|
Israel Shekel |
|
April 2016 |
|
6.0 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the derivative instruments described above is recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets for the periods as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
0.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
||
The impact on net income of unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
Embedded derivatives in purchase and delivery contracts |
|
0.3 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
— |
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||
|
Fixed price commodity contracts |
|
— |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.2 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The following table sets forth the changes in noncontrolling interests (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
Net income |
|
0.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
2.7 |
|
||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
0.1 |
|
— |
|
0.1 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
||||
|
Cash payments to noncontrolling interests |
|
(0.7 |
) |
— |
|
(0.7 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The components of other charges, net were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Information technology transformation costs |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
2.8 |
|
3.0 |
|
6.4 |
|
5.3 |
|
||||
|
Pension settlement charge |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
10.2 |
|
||||
|
Professional fees incurred in connection with internal investigation |
|
— |
|
0.4 |
|
— |
|
0.4 |
|
||||
|
Acquisition-related charges (benefits) |
|
0.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
8.1 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
||||
|
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
— |
|
2.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
4.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Other charges, net |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the changes in restructuring reserves for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in millions):
|
|
|
Total |
|
Severance |
|
Exit Costs |
|
Provisions |
|
||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
12.8 |
|
7.9 |
|
3.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
||||
|
Cash payments |
|
(16.7 |
) |
(12.5 |
) |
(3.3 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
||||
|
Other, non-cash adjustments and foreign currency effect |
|
(3.2 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Balance at September 30, 2016 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The components of interest and other income (expense), net, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
$ |
(9.4 |
) |
$ |
(9.2 |
) |
|
Exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions |
|
— |
|
(2.1 |
) |
(1.6 |
) |
(5.4 |
) |
||||
|
Loss on disposal of product line |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||
|
Other |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Interest and other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
$ |
(11.1 |
) |
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Revenue and operating income by reportable segment are presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
BSI |
|
$ |
361.5 |
|
$ |
366.6 |
|
$ |
1,057.6 |
|
$ |
1,060.3 |
|
|
BEST |
|
35.5 |
|
32.9 |
|
91.2 |
|
91.2 |
|
||||
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
(3.1 |
) |
(3.4 |
) |
(7.8 |
) |
(5.9 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
393.9 |
|
$ |
396.1 |
|
$ |
1,141.0 |
|
$ |
1,145.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
BSI |
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
$ |
95.3 |
|
$ |
68.2 |
|
|
BEST |
|
2.7 |
|
2.5 |
|
4.1 |
|
6.1 |
|
||||
|
Corporate, eliminations and other (b) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
0.9 |
|
0.7 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents product and service revenue between reportable segments. |
|
(b) |
Represents corporate costs and eliminations not allocated to the reportable segments. |
Total assets by reportable segment are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
BSI |
|
$ |
1,780.6 |
|
$ |
1,714.4 |
|
|
BEST |
|
21.5 |
|
79.1 |
|
||
|
Eliminations and other (a) |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(63.5 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,797.9 |
|
$ |
1,730.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Assets not allocated to the reportable segments and eliminations of intercompany transactions. |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||