|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
NOTE 1—NATURE OF OPERATIONS
We develop, market, sell, and support Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions. We offer solutions both as end-user stand alone products and as fully integrated modules. We market and license our products and services primarily in North America and Europe.
|
|||
NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation and consideration
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Open Text Corporation and our wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “Open Text” or the “Company”. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
These consolidated financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). The information furnished reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented and includes the financial results of Burntsand Inc. (Burntsand), with effect from May 27, 2010, Nstein Technologies Inc. (Nstein), with effect from April 1, 2010, and Vignette Corporation (Vignette), with effect from July 22, 2009 (see Note 14).
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable at that time, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In particular, significant estimates, judgments and assumptions include those related to: (i) revenue recognition, (ii) allowance for doubtful accounts, (iii) testing goodwill for impairment, (iv) the valuation of acquired intangible assets, (v) the valuation of long-lived assets, (vi) the recognition of contingencies, (vii) restructuring accruals, (viii) acquisition accruals and pre-acquisition contingencies, (ix) asset retirement obligations, (x) realization of investment tax credits, (xi) the valuation of stock options granted and liabilities related to share-based payments, including the valuation of our long-term incentive plan, (xii) the valuation of financial instruments, (xiii) the valuation of pension assets and obligations, and (xiv) accounting for income taxes.
Basis of Presentation
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (the Codification). The Codification has become the single source of authoritative non-government U.S GAAP, superseding various existing authoritative accounting pronouncements. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy contained in Statement No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative U.S. GAAP. All other U.S. GAAP literature is considered non-authoritative. This Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We adopted the Codification in our first quarter of Fiscal 2010. There was no change to our consolidated financial statements due to the implementation of the Codification other than changes in reference to various authoritative accounting pronouncements in our Notes to consolidated financial statements.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include investments that have terms to maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost and typically consist of term deposits, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and short-term interest bearing investment-grade securities of major banks in the countries in which we operate.
Capital assets
Capital assets are stated at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Gains and losses on asset disposals are taken into income in the year of disposition. The following represents the estimated useful lives of capital assets:
| Furniture and fixtures | 5 to 10 years | |
| Office equipment | 5 years | |
| Computer hardware | 3 to 7 years | |
| Computer software | 3 years | |
| Leasehold improvements | Over the term of the lease | |
| Building | 40 years |
Business combinations
In Fiscal 2010, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (ASC Topic 805), which revised the accounting guidance that we were required to apply for our acquisitions in comparison to prior fiscal years. The underlying principles are similar to the previous guidance and require that we recognize separately from goodwill the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, generally at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill to the extent that we identify adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our Consolidated Statements of Income.
As a result of adopting the revised accounting guidance provided for by ASC Topic 805 as of the beginning of Fiscal 2010, certain of our policies differ when accounting for acquisitions in Fiscal 2010 and future periods in comparison to the accounting for acquisitions in Fiscal 2009 and prior periods, including:
| • |
The direct transaction costs associated with the business combination are expensed as incurred (prior to Fiscal 2010, direct transaction costs were included as a part of the purchase price); |
| • |
The costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company are accounted for separately from the business combination (prior to Fiscal 2010, these restructuring and exit costs were included as a part of the assumed obligations in deriving the purchase price allocation); and |
| • |
Changes in estimates associated with income tax valuation allowances or uncertain tax positions after the measurement period are generally recognized as income tax expense with application of this policy also applied prospectively to all of our business combinations regardless of the acquisition date (prior to Fiscal 2010, any such changes were generally included as a part of the purchase price allocation indefinitely). |
Costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company or our internal operations are accounted for as one-time termination and exit costs pursuant to ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” (ASC Topic 420), and, as noted above, are accounted for separately from the business combination.
Uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date and we reevaluate these items quarterly with any adjustments to our preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill provided that we are within the measurement period and we continue to collect information relating to facts and circumstances that existed at acquisition date. Changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances made subsequent to the measurement period or if they relate to facts and circumstances that do not exist at acquisition date, are recorded in our provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statement of Income.
Acquired intangibles
Acquired intangibles consist of acquired technology and customer relationships associated with various acquisitions.
Acquired technology is initially recorded at fair value based on the present value of the estimated net future income-producing capabilities of software products acquired on acquisitions. We amortize acquired technology over its estimated useful life on a straight-line basis.
Customer relationships represent relationships that we have with customers of the acquired companies and are either based upon contractual or legal rights or are considered separable; that is, capable of being separated from the acquired entity and being sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. These customer relationships are initially recorded at their fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows. We amortize customer relationships on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
We continually evaluate the remaining estimated useful life of our intangible assets being amortized to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired.
ASC Topic 350 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” (ASC Topic 350) requires the carrying amounts of these assets be periodically reviewed for impairment (at least annually for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets) and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. The goodwill impairment analysis is comprised of two steps. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss equal to the difference. Recoverability of indefinite lived intangible assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future discounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If the asset is considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.
We allocate goodwill to reporting units on a geographical basis comprising of three reporting segments: North America, Europe, and “Other”; “Other” primarily consists of Australia, Japan, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates. The primary valuation method selected was the income approach (discounted cash flow) to estimate the fair value of the reporting units and have also considered the market approach to test the reasonableness of the conclusions reached through the primary approach. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results and related assumptions that are used in the preparation of the projected discounted cash flows. Should different conditions prevail, material write-downs of net intangible assets could occur. There have been no significant changes in management’s valuation assumptions from the prior year assessment. The fair value of the reporting units have been determined based upon the present value of future cash flows for each of the reporting units and based upon a discount rate that represents a risk adjusted rate of return. For this purpose we have used a discount rate of 11% based upon our estimate of the weighted average cost of our capital.
Our annual impairment analysis of goodwill was performed as of April 1, 2010. The analysis indicated that carrying values were substantially above their fair values and therefore there was no impairment for goodwill in any of our reporting units during Fiscal 2010. (No impairments were recorded for Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008).
Impairment of long-lived assets
We account for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment” (ASC Topic 360). We test long-lived assets or asset groups, such as capital assets and definite lived intangible assets, for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and a current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed of before the end of its estimated useful life.
Recoverability is assessed based on comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the aggregate pre-tax undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposal of the asset or asset group. Impairment is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group. The impairment loss, if any, is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds fair value, which for this purpose is based upon the discounted projected future cash flows of the asset or asset group. We have not recorded any impairment charges for long-lived assets during Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008. During Fiscal 2010 we recorded an impairment charge to intangible assets of $0.3 million. See Note 13 for further details.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make payments. We evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers prior to order fulfillment and based on these evaluations, we adjust our credit limit to the respective customer. In addition to these evaluations, we conduct on-going credit evaluations of our customers’ payment history and current creditworthiness. The allowance is maintained for 100% of all accounts deemed to be uncollectible and, for those receivables not specifically identified as uncollectible, an allowance is maintained for a specific percentage of those receivables based upon the aging of accounts, our historical collection experience and current economic expectations. To date, the actual losses have been within our expectations. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance as of June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Asset retirement obligations
We account for asset retirement obligations in accordance with ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (ASC Topic 410), which applies to certain obligations associated with “leasehold improvements” within our leased office facilities. ASC Topic 410 requires that a liability be initially recognized for the estimated fair value of the obligation when it is incurred. The associated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the remaining life of the underlying asset and the associated liability is accreted to the estimated fair value of the obligation at the settlement date through periodic accretion charges recorded within general and administrative expenses. When the obligation is settled, any difference between the final cost and the recorded amount is recognized as income or loss on settlement.
Revenue recognition
a) License revenues
We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (SOP 97-2) issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) in October 1997, as amended by SOP 98-9 issued in December 1998.
We record product revenue from software licenses and products when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the software product has been shipped, there are no significant uncertainties surrounding product acceptance by the customer, the fees are fixed and determinable, and collection is considered probable. We use the residual method to recognize revenue on delivered elements when a license agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date if evidence of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. If an undelivered element for the arrangement exists under the license arrangement, revenue related to the undelivered element is deferred based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of the fair value of the undelivered element.
Our multiple-element sales arrangements include arrangements where software licenses and the associated post contract customer support (PCS) are sold together. We have established VSOE of the fair value of the undelivered PCS element based on the contracted price for renewal PCS included in the original multiple element sales arrangement, as substantiated by contractual terms and our significant PCS renewal experience, from our existing worldwide base. Our multiple element sales arrangements generally include irrevocable rights for the customer to renew PCS after the bundled term ends. The customer is not subject to any economic or other penalty for failure to renew. Further, the renewal PCS options are for services comparable to the bundled PCS and cover similar terms.
It is our experience that customers generally exercise their renewal PCS option. In the renewal transaction, PCS is sold on a stand-alone basis to the licensees one year or more after the original multiple element sales arrangement. The exercised renewal PCS price is consistent with the renewal price in the original multiple element sales arrangement, although an adjustment to reflect consumer price changes is not uncommon.
If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all undelivered elements, all revenue is deferred until sufficient evidence exists or all elements have been delivered.
We assess whether payment terms are customary or extended in accordance with normal practice relative to the market in which the sale is occurring. Our sales arrangements generally include standard payment terms. These terms effectively relate to all customers, products, and arrangements regardless of customer type, product mix or arrangement size. Exceptions are only made to these standard terms for certain sales in parts of the world where local practice differs. In these jurisdictions, our customary payment terms are in line with local practice.
b) Service revenues
Service revenues consist of revenues from consulting, implementation, training and integration services. These services are set forth separately in the contractual arrangements such that the total price of the customer arrangement is expected to vary as a result of the inclusion or exclusion of these services. For those contracts where the services are not essential to the functionality of any other element of the transaction, we determine VSOE of fair value for these services based upon normal pricing and discounting practices for these services when sold separately. These consulting and implementation services contracts are primarily time and materials based contracts that are, on average, less than six months in length. Revenue from these services is recognized at the time such services are rendered as the time is incurred by us.
We also enter into contracts that are primarily fixed fee arrangements wherein the services are not essential to the functionality of a software element. In such cases, the proportional performance method is applied to recognize revenue.
Revenues from training and integration services are recognized in the period in which these services are performed.
c) Customer support revenues
Customer support revenues consist of revenue derived from contracts to provide PCS to license holders. These revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Advance billings of PCS are not recorded to the extent that the term of the PCS has not commenced and payment has not been received.
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue primarily relates to support agreements which have been paid for by customers prior to the performance of those services. Generally, the services will be provided in the twelve months after the signing of the agreement.
Long-term sales contracts
We entered into certain long-term sales contracts involving the sale of integrated solutions that include the modification and customization of software and the provision of services that are essential to the functionality of the other elements in this arrangement. As prescribed by ASC Topic 985-605, “Software-Revenue Recognition” (ASC Topic 985-606), we recognize revenue from such arrangements in accordance with the contract accounting guidelines in ASC Topic 605-35, “Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts” (ASC Topic 605-35), after evaluating for separation of any non-ASC Topic 605-35 elements in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 605-25, “Multiple-Element Arrangements” (ASC Topic 605-25).
When circumstances exist that allow us to make reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenues, contract costs and the progress of the contract to completion, we account for sales under such long-term contracts using the percentage-of-completion (POC) method of accounting. Under the POC method, progress towards completion of the contract is measured based upon either input measures or output measures. We measure progress towards completion based upon an input measure and calculate this as the proportion of the actual hours incurred compared to the total estimated hours. For training and integration services rendered under such contracts, revenues are recognized as the services are rendered. We will review, on a quarterly basis, the total estimated remaining costs to completion for each of these contracts and apply the impact of any changes on the POC prospectively. If at any time we anticipate that the estimated remaining costs to completion will exceed the value of the contract, the loss will be recognized immediately.
When circumstances exist that prevent us from making reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenues, we account for sales under such long-term contracts using the completed contract method.
Sales to resellers and channel partners
We execute certain sales contracts through resellers and distributors (collectively, resellers) and also large, well-capitalized partners such as SAP AG and Accenture Inc. (collectively, channel partners).
We recognize revenue relating to sales through resellers when all the recognition criteria have been met—in other words, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred in the reporting period, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is probable. Typically, we recognize revenue to resellers only after the reseller communicates the occurrence of end-user sales to us, since we do not have privity of contract with the end-user. In addition we assess the creditworthiness of each reseller and if the reseller is newly formed, undercapitalized or in financial difficulty any revenues expected to emanate from such resellers are deferred and recognized only when cash is received and all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
We recognize revenue relating to sales through channel partners in the reporting period in which we receive evidence, from the channel partner, of end user sales (collectively, the documentation) and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. As a result, if the documentation is not received within a given reporting period we recognize the revenue in a period subsequent to the period in which the channel partner completes the sale to the end user.
Rights of return and other incentives
We do not generally offer rights of return or any other incentives such as concessions, product rotation, or price protection and, therefore, do not provide for or make estimates of rights of return and similar incentives.
Allowance for product returns
We provide allowances for estimated returns and return rights that exist for certain legacy Captaris customers. In general, our customers are not granted return rights at the time of sale. However, Captaris has historically accepted returns and, has therefore, reduced recognized revenue for estimated product returns. For those customers to whom we do grant return rights, we reduce revenue by an estimate of these returns. If we cannot reasonably estimate these returns, we defer the revenue until the return rights lapse. For software sold to resellers for which we have granted exchange rights, we defer the revenue until the reseller sells the software through to end-users. When customer acceptance provisions are present and we cannot reasonably estimate returns, we recognize revenue upon the earlier of customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.
Research and development costs
Research and development costs internally incurred in creating computer software to be sold, licensed or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred unless they meet the criteria for deferral and amortization, as described in ASC Topic 985-20, “Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased, or Marketed” (ASC Topic 985-20). In accordance with ASC Topic 985-20, costs related to research, design and development of products are charged to expenses as incurred and capitalized between the dates that the product is considered to be technologically feasible and is considered to be ready for general release to customers. In our historical experience, the dates relating to the achievement of technological feasibility and general release of the product have substantially coincided. In addition, no significant costs are incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility. As a result, we do not capitalize any research and development costs relating to internally developed software to be sold, licensed or otherwise marketed.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (ASC Topic 740). Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. These temporary differences are measured using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the extent that we consider it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining the valuation allowance, we consider factors such as the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected taxable income, and the character of income tax assets and tax planning strategies. A change to these factors could impact the estimated valuation allowance and income tax expense.
We account for our uncertain tax provisions by using a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the appropriate amount of the benefit to recognize. The amount of benefit to recognize is measured as the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be realized. The tax position is derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not capable of being sustained. On subsequent recognition and measurement the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be recognized at each reporting date will represent the Company’s best estimate, given the information available at the reporting date, although the outcome of the tax position is not absolute or final. Upon adopting the revisions in ASC Topic 740, we elected to follow an accounting policy to classify accrued interest related to liabilities for income taxes within the “Interest expense” line and penalties related to liabilities for income taxes within the “Other expense” line of our Consolidated Statements of Income (see Note 12 for more details).
Fair value of financial instruments
Carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable (trade and accrued liabilities) approximate their fair value due to the relatively short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization.
The fair value of our total long-term debt approximates its carrying value.
Foreign currency translation
Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. In general, the functional currency of our subsidiaries is the local currency. For such subsidiary, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S dollars at the exchange rates in effect at balance sheet dates and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the month of the transaction. The effect of foreign currency translation adjustments not affecting net income are included in Shareholders’ equity under the “Cumulative translation adjustment” account as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)”. Transactional foreign currency gains (losses) are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income under the line item “Other income (expense)” (For details see Note 18).
Restructuring charges
We record restructuring charges relating to contractual lease obligations and other exit costs in accordance with ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” (ASC Topic 420). ASC Topic 420 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. In order to incur a liability pursuant to ASC Topic 420, our management must have established and approved a plan of restructuring in sufficient detail. A liability for a cost associated with involuntary termination benefits is recorded when benefits have been communicated and a liability for a cost to terminate an operating lease or other contract is incurred when the contract has been terminated in accordance with the contract terms or we have ceased using the right conveyed by the contract, such as vacating a leased facility.
The recognition of restructuring charges requires us to make certain judgments regarding the nature, timing and amount associated with the planned restructuring activities, including estimating sub-lease income and the net recoverable amount of equipment to be disposed of. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the appropriateness of the remaining accrued balances. For details, see Note 13.
Litigation
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Quarterly, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss in accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies”.
Net income per share
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding including contingently issuable shares where the contingency has been resolved. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of Common Shares and stock equivalents outstanding using the treasury stock method during the year (for details see Note 19).
Share-based payment
We measure share-based compensation costs, in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (ASC Topic 718) on the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award. We have elected to treat awards with graded vesting as a single award when estimating fair value. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee requisite service period, which in our circumstances is the stated vesting period of the award, provided that total compensation cost recognized at least equals the pro rata value of the award that has vested. Compensation cost is initially based on the estimated number of options for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. This estimate is adjusted in the period once actual forfeitures are known. For details, see Note 11.
Accounting for Pensions, post-retirement and post-employment benefits
Pension expense is accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 715, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits” (ASC Topic 715). Pension expense consists of: actuarially computed costs of pension benefits in respect of the current year of service, imputed returns on plan assets (for funded plans) and imputed interest on pension obligations. The expected costs of post retirement benefits, other than pensions, are accrued in the financial statements based upon actuarial methods and assumptions. The over-funded or under-funded status of defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans are recognized as an asset or a liability (with the offset to “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” within “Shareholders’ equity”), respectively, on the balance sheet. See Note 9 for details relating to our pension plans.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (ASC Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 applies to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements that are currently within the scope of FASB ASC Subtopic 605-25 (previously included in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue no. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”). ASU 2009-13 provides principles and application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. It also requires an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have VSOE or third-party evidence of selling price. The guidance eliminates the use of the residual method, requires entities to allocate revenue using the relative-selling-price method, and significantly expands the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. Additionally, in October 2009 the FASB also issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-14 (ASC Topic 985): “Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Arrangements” (ASU 2009-14). ASU 2009-14 focuses on determining which arrangements are within the scope of the software revenue guidance in ASC Topic 985 (previously included in AICPA Statement of Position no. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition”) and those that are not. ASU 2009-14 removes tangible products from the scope of the software revenue guidance if the products contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver a product’s essential functionality and provides guidance on determining whether software deliverables in an arrangement that includes a tangible product are within the scope of the software revenue guidance. Both of these updates are effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We have adopted these updates beginning July 1, 2010 and the adoption thereof is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure Requirements Related to Fair Value Measurements
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820)—Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value of such liability using one or more of the techniques prescribed by the update. We adopted ASU 2009-05 in our first quarter of Fiscal 2010 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 includes certain additional disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this new accounting standards update in our third quarter of Fiscal 2010 and the adoption thereof did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|||
NOTE 3—ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
|
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2007 |
$ | 2,089 | ||
|
Bad debt expense for the year |
2,855 | |||
|
Write-off /adjustments |
(970 | ) | ||
|
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2008 |
3,974 | |||
|
Bad debt expense for the year |
4,562 | |||
|
Write-off /adjustments |
(4,328 | ) | ||
|
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2009 |
4,208 | |||
|
Bad debt expense for the year |
4,683 | |||
|
Write-off /adjustments |
(4,023 | ) | ||
|
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 4,868 | ||
Included in accounts receivable are unbilled receivables in the amount of $11.7 million as of June 30, 2010 (June 30, 2009 – $7.0 million).
|
|||
NOTE 4—CAPITAL ASSETS
| As of June 30, 2010 | |||||||||
| Cost | Accumulated Depreciation |
Net | |||||||
|
Furniture and fixtures |
$ | 13,600 | $ | 9,197 | $ | 4,403 | |||
|
Office equipment |
6,542 | 5,630 | 912 | ||||||
|
Computer hardware |
89,191 | 73,789 | 15,402 | ||||||
|
Computer software |
31,244 | 24,047 | 7,197 | ||||||
|
Leasehold improvements |
23,679 | 13,570 | 10,109 | ||||||
|
Buildings* |
18,399 | 2,136 | 16,263 | ||||||
| $ | 182,655 | $ | 128,369 | $ | 54,286 | ||||
| As of June 30, 2009 | |||||||||
| Cost | Accumulated Depreciation |
Net | |||||||
|
Furniture and fixtures |
$ | 11,472 | $ | 7,677 | $ | 3,795 | |||
|
Office equipment |
8,696 | 7,674 | 1,022 | ||||||
|
Computer hardware |
77,813 | 66,118 | 11,695 | ||||||
|
Computer software |
28,094 | 20,679 | 7,415 | ||||||
|
Leasehold improvements |
19,662 | 13,074 | 6,588 | ||||||
|
Building |
16,163 | 1,513 | 14,650 | ||||||
| $ | 161,900 | $ | 116,735 | $ | 45,165 | ||||
| * | Included in the cost of the building is an amount which relates to the Company’s construction of a new building in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Additions to the building amounted to $0.3 million during the year ended June 30, 2010. Construction of the building is in progress and therefore depreciation has not yet commenced. |
|
|||
NOTE 5—GOODWILL
Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid for an acquisition of a business exceeds the fair value of identifiable net tangible and intangible assets. The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill since June 30, 2008:
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
$ | 564,648 | ||
|
Acquisition of Vizible Corporation (note 14) |
253 | |||
|
Acquisition of Captaris Inc. (note 14) |
65,508 | |||
|
Acquisition of a division of Spicer Corporation (note 14) |
4,791 | |||
|
Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions* |
(33,120 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange |
(25,969 | ) | ||
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
576,111 | |||
|
Acquisition of Burntsand Inc. (note 14) |
5,485 | |||
|
Acquisition of New Generation Consulting Inc. (note 14) |
3,062 | |||
|
Acquisition of Nstein Technologies Inc. (note 14) |
3,282 | |||
|
Acquisition of Vignette Corporation (note 14) |
109,956 | |||
|
Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions** |
(751 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange |
(25,521 | ) | ||
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
$ | 671,624 | ||
| * | Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions relate primarily to: (i) adjustments to plans formulated in accordance with the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination” (EITF 95-3), relating to employee termination and abandonment of excess facilities and (ii) the evaluation of the tax attributes of acquisition-related operating loss carry forwards and deductions, including reductions in previously recognized valuation allowances, originally assessed at the various dates of acquisition. |
| ** | Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions relate to EITF 95-3 adjustments made in relation to acquisitions consummated prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 805 (pre Fiscal 2010 acquisitions). |
|
|||
NOTE 6—ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
| Technology Assets |
Customer Assets |
Total | ||||||||||
|
Net book value, June 30, 2008 |
$ | 141,703 | $ | 140,121 | $ | 281,824 | ||||||
|
Acquisition of Vizible Corporation (note 14) |
374 | — | 374 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of Captaris Inc. (note 14) |
73,600 | 32,900 | 106,500 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of eMotion LLC (note 14) |
2,823 | 1,411 | 4,234 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of a division of Spicer Corporation (note 14) |
5,529 | 1,777 | 7,306 | |||||||||
|
Purchase of an asset group constituting a business (note 14) |
— | 2,081 | 2,081 | |||||||||
|
Amortization expense |
(47,733 | ) | (33,259 | ) | (80,992 | ) | ||||||
|
Foreign exchange and other impacts |
(2,749 | ) | (3,530 | ) | (6,279 | ) | ||||||
|
Net book value, June 30, 2009 |
173,547 | 141,501 | 315,048 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of Burntsand Inc.(note 14) |
— | 753 | 753 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of New Generation Consulting Inc.(note 14) |
— | 440 | 440 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of Nstein Technologies Inc. (note 14) |
17,310 | 2,919 | 20,229 | |||||||||
|
Acquisition of Vignette Corporation (note 14) |
68,200 | 22,700 | 90,900 | |||||||||
|
Amortization expense |
(60,472 | ) | (35,940 | ) | (96,412 | ) | ||||||
|
Impairment of intangible assets (note 13) |
(281 | ) | — | (281 | ) | |||||||
|
Foreign exchange and other impacts |
(308 | ) | (2,176 | ) | (2,484 | ) | ||||||
|
Net book value, June 30, 2010 |
$ | 197,996 | $ | 130,197 | $ | 328,193 | ||||||
The weighted average amortization period for acquired technology and customer intangible assets is approximately 6 years and 7 years, respectively.
The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for the fiscal years indicated below. This calculation assumes no future adjustments to acquired intangible assets:
| Fiscal years ending June 30, |
|||
|
2011 |
$ | 96,265 | |
|
2012 |
94,018 | ||
|
2013 |
90,739 | ||
|
2014 |
31,576 | ||
|
2015 and beyond |
15,595 | ||
|
Total |
$ | 328,193 | |
|
|||
NOTE 7—OTHER ASSETS
| As of June 30, 2010 |
As of June 30, 2009 |
|||||
|
Debt issuance costs |
$ | 4,362 | $ | 4,728 | ||
|
Deposits and restricted cash |
8,486 | 4,615 | ||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets |
3,858 | 3,130 | ||||
|
Pension assets |
190 | 591 | ||||
|
Deferred charges |
27,558 | — | ||||
| $ | 44,454 | $ | 13,064 | |||
Debt issuance costs relate primarily to costs incurred for the purpose of obtaining long-term debt used to partially finance our acquisition of Hummingbird Ltd. in 2006 (the Hummingbird acquisition) and are being amortized over the life of the long-term debt. Deposits and restricted cash relate to security deposits provided to landlords in accordance with facility lease agreements and cash restricted per the terms of contractual-based agreements. Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets primarily relate to certain advance payments on long-term licenses that are being amortized over the applicable terms of the licenses. Pension assets relate to defined benefit pension plans for legacy IXOS Software AG (IXOS) employees and directors (see Note 9), recognized under ASC Topic 715, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits”. Deferred charges relate to cash taxes payable and the elimination of deferred tax balances on account of legal entity consolidations done as part of an internal reorganization of international subsidiaries in Fiscal 2010 (see Note 12).
|
|||
NOTE 8—ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are comprised of the following:
| As of June 30, 2010 |
As of June 30, 2009 |
|||||
|
Accounts payable—trade |
$ | 12,247 | $ | 15,465 | ||
|
Accrued salaries and commissions |
34,062 | 31,973 | ||||
|
Accrued liabilities |
53,844 | 49,527 | ||||
|
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring (note 13) |
11,498 | 5,061 | ||||
|
Amounts payable in respect of acquisitions and acquisition related accruals |
4,417 | 12,992 | ||||
|
Asset retirement obligations |
3,536 | 1,974 | ||||
| $ | 119,604 | $ | 116,992 | |||
Long-term accrued liabilities
| As of June 30, 2010 |
As of June 30, 2009 |
|||||
|
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring (note 13) |
$ | 582 | $ | 849 | ||
|
Amounts payable in respect of acquisitions and acquisition related accruals |
2,514 | 7,128 | ||||
|
Other accrued liabilities |
9,982 | 7,936 | ||||
|
Asset retirement obligations |
2,677 | 5,186 | ||||
| $ | 15,755 | $ | 21,099 | |||
Asset retirement obligations
We are required to return certain of our leased facilities to their original state at the conclusion of our lease. We have accounted for such obligations in accordance with ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations”. As of June 30, 2010 the present value of this obligation was $6.2 million (June 30, 2009 – $7.2 million), with an undiscounted value of $6.8 million (June 30, 2009 – $8.7 million).
Accruals relating to acquisitions
In relation to our acquisitions made before July 1, 2009, the date on which we adopted ASC Topic 805, we have accrued for costs relating to legacy workforce reductions and abandonment of excess legacy facilities. Such accruals were capitalized as part of the cost of the subject acquisition and in the case of abandoned facilities, have been recorded at present value less our best estimate for future sub-lease income and costs incurred to achieve sub-tenancy. The accrual for workforce reductions is extinguished against the payments made to the employees and in the case of excess facilities, will be discharged over the term of the respective leases. Any excess of the difference between the present value and actual cash paid for the abandoned facility will be charged to income and any deficits will be reversed to goodwill. The provisions for abandoned facilities are expected to be paid by February 2015.
The following table summarizes the activity with respect to our acquisition accruals during the year ended June 30, 2010.
| Balance June 30, 2009 |
Initial Accruals |
Usage/ Foreign Exchange |
Subsequent Adjustments to Goodwill |
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
|
Captaris |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
$ | 4,916 | $ | — | $ | (4,264 | ) | $ | (590 | ) | $ | 62 | |||||
|
Excess facilities |
6,123 | — | (2,333 | ) | 147 | 3,937 | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | (49 | ) | 49 | — | |||||||||||
| 11,039 | — | (6,646 | ) | (394 | ) | 3,999 | |||||||||||
|
Hummingbird |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
25 | — | (25 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
1,463 | — | (998 | ) | (251 | ) | 214 | ||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| 1,488 | — | (1,023 | ) | (251 | ) | 214 | |||||||||||
|
IXOS |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
7,483 | — | (4,624 | ) | (196 | ) | 2,663 | ||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| 7,483 | — | (4,624 | ) | (196 | ) | 2,663 | |||||||||||
|
Centrinity |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
110 | — | (55 | ) | — | 55 | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| 110 | — | (55 | ) | — | 55 | ||||||||||||
|
Totals |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
4,941 | — | (4,289 | ) | (590 | ) | 62 | ||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
15,179 | — | (8,010 | ) | (300 | ) | 6,869 | ||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | (49 | ) | 49 | — | |||||||||||
| $ | 20,120 | $ | — | $ | (12,348 | ) | $ | (841 | ) | $ | 6,931 | ||||||
The following table summarizes the activity with respect to our acquisition accruals during the year ended June 30, 2009.
| Balance June 30, 2008 |
Initial Accruals |
Usage/ Foreign Exchange |
Subsequent Adjustments to Goodwill |
Balance June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
|
Captaris |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
$ | — | $ | 9,276 | $ | (6,870 | ) | $ | 2,510 | $ | 4,916 | ||||||
|
Excess facilities |
— | 3,347 | (1,060 | ) | 3,836 | 6,123 | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | 797 | (1,109 | ) | 312 | — | |||||||||||
| — | 13,420 | (9,039 | ) | 6,658 | 11,039 | ||||||||||||
|
Division of Spicer Corporation |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | 262 | (240 | ) | (22 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| — | 262 | (240 | ) | (22 | ) | — | |||||||||||
|
Hummingbird |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
310 | — | (189 | ) | (96 | ) | 25 | ||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
4,249 | — | (1,991 | ) | (795 | ) | 1,463 | ||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
815 | — | (120 | ) | (695 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| 5,374 | — | (2,300 | ) | (1,586 | ) | 1,488 | |||||||||||
|
IXOS |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
15,255 | — | (7,772 | ) | — | 7,483 | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | (45 | ) | 45 | — | |||||||||||
| 15,255 | — | (7,817 | ) | 45 | 7,483 | ||||||||||||
|
Eloquent |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
243 | — | (243 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
| 243 | — | (243 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Centrinity |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
211 | — | (101 | ) | — | 110 | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| 211 | — | (101 | ) | — | 110 | ||||||||||||
|
Artesia |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
24 | — | (24 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| 24 | — | (24 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Totals |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination costs |
310 | 9,276 | (7,059 | ) | 2,414 | 4,941 | |||||||||||
|
Excess facilities |
19,739 | 3,347 | (10,948 | ) | 3,041 | 15,179 | |||||||||||
|
Transaction-related costs |
1,058 | 1,059 | (1,757 | ) | (360 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| $ | 21,107 | $ | 13,682 | $ | (19,764 | ) | $ | 5,095 | $ | 20,120 | |||||||
The adjustments to goodwill primarily relate to adjustments to amounts accrued for employee termination costs and excess facilities accounted for in accordance with EITF 95-3. The goodwill adjustments relating to amounts accrued for transaction costs are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.141, “Business Combinations”, as they relate to acquisitions consummated prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 805 (on July 1, 2009).
|
|||
NOTE 9—PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS
CDT Defined Benefit Plan and CDT Long-term Employee Benefit Obligations:
On November 1, 2008, the following unfunded defined benefit pension plan and long-term employee benefit obligations were acquired, relating to legacy Captaris employees of a wholly owned subsidiary of Captaris called Captaris Document Technologies GmbH (CDT). As of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the balances relating to these obligations were as follows:
| Total benefit obligation |
Current portion of benefit obligation* |
Noncurrent portion of benefit obligation |
|||||||
|
CDT defined benefit plan |
$ | 15,507 | $ | 405 | $ | 15,102 | |||
|
CDT Anniversary plan |
524 | 89 | 435 | ||||||
|
CDT early retirement plan |
351 | — | 351 | ||||||
|
Total as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 16,382 | $ | 494 | $ | 15,888 | |||
| Total benefit obligation |
Current portion of benefit obligation* |
Noncurrent portion of benefit obligation |
|||||||
|
CDT defined benefit plan |
$ | 14,828 | $ | 362 | $ | 14,466 | |||
|
CDT Anniversary plan |
960 | 214 | 746 | ||||||
|
CDT early retirement plan |
591 | — | 591 | ||||||
|
Total as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | 16,379 | $ | 576 | $ | 15,803 | |||
| * | The current portion of the benefit obligation has been included within Accounts payable and accrued liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
CDT Defined Benefit Plan
CDT sponsors an unfunded defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all CDT employees (CDT pension plan) which provides for old age, disability and survivors’ benefits. Benefits under the CDT pension plan are generally based on age at retirement, years of service and the employee’s annual earnings. The net periodic cost of this pension plan is determined using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and estimated service costs.
The following are the components of net periodic benefit costs for the CDT pension plan and the details of the change in the benefit obligation for the periods indicated:
| As of June 30, 2010 |
As of June 30, 2009 |
|||||||
|
Benefit obligation—beginning |
$ | 14,828 | * | $ | 13,489 | ** | ||
|
Service cost |
403 | 349 | ||||||
|
Interest cost |
862 | 585 | ||||||
|
Benefits paid |
(340 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
|
Curtailment gain |
(308 | )*** | (271 | ) | ||||
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
2,064 | (734 | ) | |||||
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
(2,002 | ) | 1,544 | |||||
|
Benefit obligation—ending |
15,507 | 14,828 | ||||||
|
Less: current portion |
(405 | ) | (362 | ) | ||||
|
Noncurrent portion of benefit obligation |
$ | 15,102 | $ | 14,466 | ||||
| * | Benefit obligation as of June 30, 2009. |
| ** | Benefit obligation as of November 1, 2008 (date of acquisition). |
| *** | Includes portion charged to the purchase price adjustment in accordance with ASC Topic 715, paragraph 30-15. |
The following are the details of net pension expense for the CDT pension plan for the periods indicated:
| Year ended June 30, 2010 |
Year ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||
|
Pension expense: |
|||||||
|
Service cost |
$ | 403 | $ | 349 | |||
|
Interest cost |
862 | 585 | |||||
|
Curtailment gain |
(403 | ) | — | ||||
|
Net pension expense |
$ | 862 | $ | 934 | |||
The CDT pension plan is an unfunded plan and therefore no contributions have been made since the inception of the plan.
In determining the fair value of the CDT pension plan benefit obligations as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, we used the following weighted-average key assumptions:
| June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||
|
Assumptions: |
||||||
|
Salary increases |
2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | ||
|
Pension increases |
1.50 | % | 1.50 | % | ||
|
Discount rate |
5.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||
|
Employee fluctuation rate: |
||||||
|
to age 30 |
1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | ||
|
to age 35 |
0.50 | % | 0.50 | % | ||
|
to age 40 |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||
|
to age 45 |
0.50 | % | 0.50 | % | ||
|
to age 50 |
0.50 | % | 0.50 | % | ||
|
from age 51 |
1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | ||
Anticipated pension payments under the CDT pension plan for the fiscal years indicated below are as follows:
|
2011 |
$ | 405 | |
|
2012 |
427 | ||
|
2013 |
474 | ||
|
2014 |
524 | ||
|
2015 |
590 | ||
|
2016 to 2019 |
3,882 | ||
|
Total |
$ | 6,302 | |
CDT Long-term Employee Benefit Obligations.
CDT’s long-term employee benefit obligations arise under CDT’s “Anniversary plan” and an early retirement plan. The obligation is unfunded and carried at a fair value of $0.5 million for the Anniversary plan and $0.4 million for the early retirement plan as of June 30, 2010 ($1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009).
The Anniversary plan is a defined benefit plan for long-tenured CDT employees. The plan provides for a lump-sum payment to employees of two months of salary upon reaching the anniversary of twenty-five years of service and three months of salary upon reaching the anniversary of forty years of service. The early retirement plan is designed to create an incentive for employees, within a certain age group, to transition from (full or part-time) employment into retirement before their legal retirement age. This plan allows employees, upon reaching a certain age, to elect to work full-time for a period of time and be paid 50% of their full-time salary. After working within this arrangement for a designated period of time, the employee is eligible to take early retirement and receive payments from the earned but unpaid salaries until they are eligible to receive payments under the postretirement benefit plan discussed above. Benefits under the early retirement plan are generally based on the employee’s compensation and the number of years of service.
IXOS AG Defined Benefit Plans
Included within “Other Assets” are net pension assets of $0.2 million (June 30, 2009 – $0.6 million) relating to two IXOS defined benefit pensions plans (IXOS pension plans) in connection with certain former members of the IXOS Board of Directors and certain IXOS employees, respectively (See Note 7 “Other Assets”). The net periodic pension cost with respect to the IXOS pension plans is determined using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets. The fair value of our total plan assets under the IXOS pension plans, as of June 30, 2010, is $3.3 million (June 30, 2009 – $3.5 million). The fair value of our total pension obligation under the IXOS pension plans as of June 30, 2010 is $3.1 million (June 30, 2009 – $2.9 million).
|
|||
NOTE 10—LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt
Long-term debt is comprised of the following:
| As of June 30, 2010 |
As of June 30, 2009 |
|||||
|
Long-term debt |
||||||
|
Term loan |
$ | 288,019 | $ | 291,012 | ||
|
Mortgage |
12,493 | 11,671 | ||||
| 300,512 | 302,683 | |||||
|
Less: |
||||||
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
||||||
|
Term loan |
2,993 | 2,993 | ||||
|
Mortgage |
12,493 | 456 | ||||
| 15,486 | 3,449 | |||||
|
Long-term portion of long-term debt |
$ | 285,026 | $ | 299,234 | ||
Term loan and Revolver
On October 2, 2006, we entered into a $465.0 million credit agreement (the credit agreement) with a Canadian chartered bank (the bank) consisting of a $390.0 million term loan facility (the term loan) and a $75.0 million committed revolving long-term credit facility (the revolver). The term loan was used to finance a portion of our Hummingbird acquisition. We have not drawn down any amounts under the revolver to date.
Term loan
The term loan has a seven year term, expires on October 2, 2013 and bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%. The quarterly scheduled term loan principal repayments are equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount, due each quarter with the remainder due at the end of the term, less ratable reductions for any non-scheduled prepayments made. From October 2, 2006 (the inception of the loan) to June 30, 2010, we have made total non-scheduled prepayments of $90.0 million towards the principal on the term loan. Our current quarterly scheduled principal payment is approximately $0.7 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2010, we recorded interest expense of $7.4 million (June 30, 2009-$11.2 million and June 30, 2008- $21.3 million) relating to the term loan.
Revolver
The revolver has a five year term and expires on October 2, 2011. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at rates specified in the credit agreement. The revolver is subject to a “stand-by” fee ranging between 0.30% and 0.50% per annum depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver as of June 30, 2010.
For the year ended June 30, 2010, we recorded an expense of $0.2 million (June 30, 2009 – $0.2 million and June 30, 2008 – $0.3 million), on account of stand-by fees relating to the revolver.
Mortgage
The mortgage consists of a five year mortgage agreement entered into during December 2005 with the bank. The original principal amount of the mortgage was Canadian $15.0 million. The mortgage: (i) has a fixed term of five years, (ii) matures on January 1, 2011, and (iii) is secured by a lien on our headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Interest accrues monthly at a fixed rate of 5.25% per annum. Principal and interest are payable in monthly installments of Canadian $0.1 million with a final lump sum principal payment of Canadian $12.6 million due on maturity. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of the mortgage was $12.5 million (June 30, 2009 – $11.7 million).
As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of the existing Waterloo building was $15.9 million (June 30, 2009 – $14.7 million).
For the year ended June 30, 2010, we recorded interest expense of $0.6 million (June 30, 2009 – $0.6 million and June 30, 2008 – $0.7 million) relating to the mortgage.
|
|||
NOTE 11—SHARE CAPITAL, OPTION PLANS AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Share Capital
Our authorized share capital includes an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of first preference shares. No preference shares have been issued.
Treasury Stock
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010, we repurchased 307,579 Open Text shares, in the amount of $14.0 million, for the purpose of future reissuance under our Fiscal 2010 Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP). No such purchases were made during Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008.
As of June 30, 2010 we have not reissued any shares from treasury.
Option Plans
A summary of stock options outstanding under our various Stock Option Plans is set forth below. All numbers shown in the chart below have been adjusted, where applicable, to account for the two-for-one stock split that occurred on October 22, 2003.
| 1998 Stock Option Plan |
2004 Stock Option Plan |
Artesia Stock Option Plan |
Centrinity Stock Option Plan |
Gauss Stock Option Plan |
Hummingbird Option Plan |
IXOS Stock Option Plan |
Vista Stock Option Plan |
|||||||||
|
Date of inception |
Jun-98 | Oct-04 | Sep-04 | Jan-03 | Jan-04 | Oct-06 | Mar-04 | Sep-04 | ||||||||
|
Eligibility |
Eligible employees and directors, as determined by the Board of Directors |
Eligible employees, as determined by the Board of Directors |
Eligible employees, and consultants of Artesia Technologies Inc. |
Eligible employees, consultants and directors, as determined by the Board of Directors |
Eligible employees as determined by the Board of Directors |
Eligible employees, and consultants of Hummingbird Inc. |
Eligible employees as determined by the Board of Directors |
Former employees, and consultants of Vista Inc. |
||||||||
|
Options granted to date |
7,914,290 | 3,122,100 | 20,000 | 414,968 | 51,000 | 355,675 | 210,000 | 43,500 | ||||||||
|
Options exercised to date |
(4,457,680) | (974,850) | — | (395,641) | (3,000) | (18,579) | (57,250) | (19,250) | ||||||||
|
Options cancelled to date |
(2,555,110) | (463,625) | (10,000) | (13,500) | (13,000) | (318,531) | (144,750) | (17,625) | ||||||||
|
Options outstanding |
901,500 | 1,683,625 | 10,000 | 5,827 | 35,000 | 18,565 | 8,000 | 6,625 | ||||||||
|
Termination grace periods |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
Immediately “for cause”; 90 days for any other reason; 180 days due to death |
||||||||
|
Vesting schedule |
25% per year, unless other-
wise |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
25% per
year,
unless wise specified |
||||||||
|
Exercise price range |
$8.44 – $31.35 | $14.02 – $48.39 | $17.99 – $17.99 | $13.50 – $13.50 | $26.24 – $26.24 | $18.36 – $27.75 | $26.24 – $26.24 | $17.99 – $17.99 | ||||||||
|
Expiration dates |
7/31/2010 to 2/3/2016 |
12/9/2011 to 5/3/2017 |
9/3/2010 to 9/3/2013 |
1/28/2013 to 1/28/2013 |
1/27/2014 to 1/27/2014 |
10/2/2013 to 10/2/2013 |
1/27/2014 to 1/27/2014 |
9/3/2010 to 9/3/2013 |
||||||||
The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding at June 30, 2010:
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||
|
Range of Exercise |
Number of options Outstanding as of June 30, 2010 |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number of options Exercisable as of June 30, 2010 |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||
|
$ 8.44 – $14.02 |
500,327 | 2.46 | $ | 12.32 | 450,327 | $ | 12.14 | |||||
|
$14.10 – $14.94 |
317,750 | 1.48 | 14.15 | 317,750 | 14.15 | |||||||
|
$14.94 – $17.01 |
320,775 | 1.29 | 16.85 | 214,525 | 16.78 | |||||||
|
$17.04 – $19.85 |
289,342 | 2.88 | 18.53 | 253,983 | 18.36 | |||||||
|
$20.00 – $27.70 |
273,100 | 4.47 | 24.25 | 230,600 | 24.40 | |||||||
|
$27.75 – $31.35 |
201,098 | 5.04 | 29.93 | 82,456 | 30.71 | |||||||
|
$34.50 – $34.75 |
397,500 | 4.10 | 34.51 | 90,000 | 34.51 | |||||||
|
$34.75 – $42.14 |
218,750 | 6.13 | 38.36 | 18,750 | 37.22 | |||||||
|
$43.43 – $48.39 |
150,500 | 6.62 | 44.44 | — | — | |||||||
|
$ 8.44 – $48.39 |
2,669,142 | 3.43 | $ | 23.55 | 1,658,391 | $ | 18.20 | |||||
Share-Based Payments
Total share-based compensation cost for the periods indicated below is detailed as follows:
| Year ended June 30, | ||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
|
Stock options |
$ | 7,293 | * | $ | 5,032 | $ | 3,789 | |||
|
Restricted stock units (legacy Vignette employees) |
869 | — | — | |||||||
|
Deferred stock units (Directors) |
127 | — | — | |||||||
|
Performance stock units (Fiscal 2010 LTIP) |
1,476 | — | — | |||||||
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ | 9,765 | $ | 5,032 | $ | 3,789 | ||||
| * | Inclusive of charges of $3.2 million booked to Special charges (see Note 13). |
Summary of Outstanding Stock Options
As of June 30, 2010, options to purchase an aggregate of 2,669,142 Common Shares were outstanding and 1,382,345 Common Shares were available for issuance under our stock option plans. Our stock options generally vest over four years and expire between seven and ten years from the date of the grant. The exercise price of the options we grant is set at an amount that is not less than the closing price of our Common Shares on the trading day on NASDAQ immediately preceding the applicable grant date.
A summary of option activity under our stock option plans for the year ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
| Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($’000s) |
||||||||
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
2,828,989 | $ | 20.71 | ||||||||
|
Granted |
328,000 | 41.29 | |||||||||
|
Exercised |
(474,444 | ) | 18.86 | ||||||||
|
Forfeited or expired |
(13,403 | ) | 24.61 | ||||||||
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
2,669,142 | $ | 23.55 | 3.43 | $ | 38,589 | |||||
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
1,658,391 | $ | 18.20 | 2.75 | $ | 32,073 | |||||
| Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($’000s) |
||||||||
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
3,763,665 | $ | 15.22 | ||||||||
|
Granted |
716,100 | 32.66 | |||||||||
|
Exercised |
(1,538,572 | ) | 12.17 | ||||||||
|
Forfeited or expired |
(112,204 | ) | 29.95 | ||||||||
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
2,828,989 | $ | 20.71 | 4.27 | $ | 44,476 | |||||
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
1,625,975 | $ | 16.64 | 3.49 | $ | 32,173 | |||||
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, consistent with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (ASC Topic 718), and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The option-pricing models require input of subjective assumptions including the estimated life of the option and the expected volatility of the underlying stock over the estimated life of the option. We use historical volatility as a basis for projecting the expected volatility of the underlying stock and estimate the expected life of our stock options based upon historical data.
We believe that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair value of our stock option grants. Estimates of fair value are not intended, however, to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards.
For the periods indicated, the following weighted-average fair value of options and weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:
| Year ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
|
Weighted—average fair value of options granted |
$ | 14.26 | $ | 12.47 | $ | 12.72 | ||||||
|
Weighted-average assumptions used: |
||||||||||||
|
Expected volatility |
39 | % | 42 | % | 43 | % | ||||||
|
Risk—free interest rate |
2.2 | % | 2.9 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||
|
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
|
Expected life (in years) |
4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |||||||||
|
Forfeiture rate (based on historical rates) |
5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||
As of June 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to the unvested stock awards not yet recognized was $7.8 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.
No cash was used by us to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation arrangements.
We have not capitalized any share-based compensation costs as part of the cost of an asset in any of the periods presented.
For the year ended June 30, 2010, cash in the amount of $8.9 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 2010 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $1.9 million, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
For the year ended June 30, 2009, cash in the amount of $18.7 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 2009 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $8.6 million, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
For the year ended June 30, 2008, cash in the amount of $11.6 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 2008 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $1.1 million, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
Deferred Stock Units (DSUs) and Performance Stock Units (PSUs)
During the year ended June 30, 2010, we granted 4,299 deferred stock units (DSUs) to certain nonemployee directors (June 30, 2009 – nil, June 30, 2008 – nil). The DSUs were issued under the Company’s Deferred Share Unit Plan that came into effect on February 2, 2010 and will vest at the date of the Company’s next annual general meeting (expected to be in December, 2010).
During the year ended June 30, 2010 we also granted 307,579 performance stock units (PSUs) under our Fiscal 2010 LTIP (June 30, 2009-nil, June 30, 2008-nil). Awards achieved under the Fiscal 2010 LTIP will be settled over the three year period ending June 30, 2012.
Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs)
On July 21, 2009, we granted, as part of our acquisition of Vignette, 574,767 Open Text RSAs to certain legacy Vignette employees and directors as replacement for similar restricted stock awards held by these employees and directors when they were employed by Vignette. These awards were valued at $13.33 per RSA on July 21, 2009, and a portion has been allocated to the purchase price of Vignette. The remaining portion is amortized, as part of share-based compensation expense, over the vesting period of these awards.
Long Term Incentive Plans
On September 10, 2007, our Board of Directors approved the implementation of a LTIP called the “Open Text Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan”. The LTIP is a rolling three year program whereby we make a series of annual grants, each of which covers a three year performance period, to certain of our employees, and which vests upon the employee and/or the Company meeting pre-determined performance and market-based criteria.
Grants made in Fiscal 2008 under the LTIP (LTIP 1) took effect in Fiscal 2008, starting on July 1, 2007. Awards under LTIP 1 will be settled in cash.
Grants made in Fiscal 2009 under the LTIP (LTIP 2) took effect in Fiscal 2009 starting on July 1, 2008. Awards under LTIP 2 may be equal to 100% of the target. We expect to settle LTIP 2 awards in cash.
Grants made in Fiscal 2010 under the LTIP (LTIP 3) took effect in Fiscal 2010 starting on July 1, 2009. Awards under LTIP 3 may be equal to 50%, 100% or 150% of the target. We expect to settle LTIP 3 awards in stock.
Consistent with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, we have measured the fair value of the liability under LTIP 1 and LTIP 2 as of June 30, 2010 and recorded an expense relating to such liability to compensation cost in the amount of $14.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2010 (June 30, 2009 – $3.9 million, June 30, 2008 – $2.2 million). The outstanding liability under the LTIP as of June 30, 2010 was $15.4 million (June 30, 2009 – $6.2 million) and is re-measured based upon the change in the fair value of the liability, as of the end of every reporting period, and a cumulative adjustment to compensation cost for the change in fair value is recognized. The cumulative compensation expense recognized upon completion of the LTIP will be equal to the payouts made.
PSUs granted under LTIP 3 have been measured at fair value, consistent with ASC Topic 718 and will be charged to share-based compensation expense over the remaining life of the plan. During Fiscal 2010 an amount of $1.5 million has been charged to share-based compensation expense on account of LTIP 3.
|
|||
NOTE 12—INCOME TAXES
We operate in several tax jurisdictions. Our income is subject to varying rates of tax, and losses incurred in one jurisdiction cannot be used to offset income taxes payable in another. The effective tax rate represents the net effect of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions which are subject to a wide range of income tax rates.
The following is a geographical breakdown of income before the provision for income taxes:
| Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
|
Domestic income |
$ | 44,296 | $ | 28,493 | $ | 55,385 | |||
|
Foreign income |
44,569 | 52,284 | 21,112 | ||||||
|
Income before income taxes* |
$ | 88,865 | $ | 80,777 | $ | 76,497 | |||
| * | Excludes minority interest of nil, $51,000 and $498,000, respectively, for Fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008. |
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
|
Current income taxes: |
||||||||||||
|
Domestic |
$ | 2,649 | $ | 5,450 | $ | 11,874 | ||||||
|
Foreign |
22,881 | 28,252 | 35,445 | |||||||||
| 25,530 | 33,702 | 47,319 | ||||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes (recoveries): |
||||||||||||
|
Domestic |
16,001 | (60 | ) | 2,064 | ||||||||
|
Foreign |
(40,220 | ) | (9,854 | ) | (26,390 | ) | ||||||
| (24,219 | ) | (9,914 | ) | (24,326 | ) | |||||||
|
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 1,311 | $ | 23,788 | $ | 22,993 | ||||||
A reconciliation of the combined Canadian federal and provincial income tax rate with our effective income tax rate is as follows:
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
|
Expected statutory rate |
32.50 | % | 33.25 | % | 34.81 | % | ||||||
|
Expected provision for income taxes |
$ | 28,881 | $ | 26,858 | $ | 26,629 | ||||||
|
Effect of permanent differences |
(2,130 | ) | (4,850 | ) | (2,971 | ) | ||||||
|
Effect of foreign tax rate differences |
(8,275 | ) | (7,296 | ) | (1,189 | ) | ||||||
|
Effect of change in tax rates |
(6,768 | ) | (1,540 | ) | (1,603 | ) | ||||||
|
Benefit of losses |
— | — | (1,082 | ) | ||||||||
|
Change in valuation allowance |
814 | 6,823 | 1,809 | |||||||||
|
Difference in tax filings from provision |
1,590 | 177 | 1,880 | |||||||||
|
Withholding taxes and other items |
8,401 | 3,616 | (480 | ) | ||||||||
|
Impact of internal reorganization of subsidiaries and legal entity reductions |
(21,202 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| $ | 1,311 | $ | 23,788 | $ | 22,993 | |||||||
As a result of an internal reorganization of our international subsidiaries we recorded a tax recovery of $21.2 million during Fiscal 2010. This initiative was undertaken to consolidate our intellectual property within certain jurisdictions and to effect an operational reduction of our global subsidiaries with a view to, eventually, having a single operating legal entity in each jurisdiction.
We have approximately $39.7 million of domestic non-capital loss carryforwards. In addition, we have $169.2 million of foreign non-capital loss carryforwards of which $129.9 million have no expiry date. The remainder of the foreign losses expires between 2011 and 2030. In addition, investment tax credits of $25.9 million will expire between 2011 and 2030.
The primary components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows, for the periods indicated below:
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
|
Deferred tax assets |
||||||||
|
Non-capital loss carryforwards |
$ | 63,589 | $ | 106,858 | ||||
|
Capital loss carryforwards |
— | 5,993 | ||||||
|
Undeducted scientific research and development expenses |
7,859 | 11,242 | ||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
15,510 | 22,252 | ||||||
|
Restructuring costs and other reserves |
10,690 | 13,927 | ||||||
|
Other |
22,923 | 24,165 | ||||||
|
Total deferred tax asset |
120,571 | 184,437 | ||||||
|
Valuation allowance |
(63,991 | ) | (81,767 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||
|
Scientific research and development tax credits |
(8,252 | ) | (10,282 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred credits |
(861 | ) | (772 | ) | ||||
|
Acquired intangibles |
(11,028 | ) | (108,798 | ) | ||||
|
Intercompany debt reserve |
(22,418 | ) | — | |||||
|
Other |
(12,745 | ) | (1,717 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
(55,304 | ) | (121,569 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
$ | 1,276 | $ | (18,899 | ) | |||
|
Comprised of: |
||||||||
|
Current assets |
$ | 15,714 | $ | 20,621 | ||||
|
Long-term assets |
27,405 | 69,877 | ||||||
|
Current liabilities |
(28,384 | ) | (508 | ) | ||||
|
Long-term liabilities |
(13,459 | ) | (108,889 | ) | ||||
| $ | 1,276 | $ | (18,899 | ) | ||||
We believe that sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets that a valuation allowance is required. We continue to evaluate our taxable position quarterly and consider factors by taxing jurisdiction, including but not limited to factors such as estimated taxable income, any historical experience of losses for tax purposes and the future growth of Open Text.
The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) were as follows:
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of July 1, 2008 |
$ | 89,324 | ||
|
Increases on account of current year positions |
4,819 | |||
|
Increases on account of prior year positions |
2,346 | |||
|
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities |
(201 | ) | ||
|
Decreases due to lapses of statutes of limitations |
(4,935 | ) | ||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of July 1, 2009 |
91,353 | |||
|
Increases on account of current year positions |
540 | |||
|
Increases on account of prior year positions* |
22,429 | |||
|
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities |
(671 | ) | ||
|
Decreases due to lapses of statutes of limitations |
(6,153 | ) | ||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 107,498 | ||
| * | Included in these balances as of June 30, 2010, are acquired balances of $4.4 million, relating to the acquisition of Vignette. |
Included in the above tabular reconciliation are unrecognized tax benefits of $42.1 million relating to deferred tax assets in jurisdictions in which these deferred tax assets are offset with valuation allowances. The net unrecognized tax benefit excluding these deferred tax assets is $65.4 million as of June 30, 2010 ($47.0 million as of June 30, 2009).
Upon adoption of FIN 48 we elected to follow an accounting policy to classify interest related to liabilities for income tax expense under the “Interest income (expense), net” line and penalties related to liabilities for income tax expense under the “Other income (expense)” line of our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ended June 30, 2010, we recognized interest in the amount of $1.4 million (June 30, 2009 – $1.0 million, June 30, 2008 – $1.1 million) and penalties reversed in the amount of $1.1 million (June 30, 2009 penalties recognized- $0.2 million, June 30, 2008 penalties recognized – $0.4 million). The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of June 30, 2010 was $6.8 million ($4.1 million as of June 30, 2009) and $12.0 million ($9.4 million as of June 30, 2009), respectively. Included in these balances as of June 30, 2010, are accrued interest and penalties of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, relating to the acquisition of Vignette (see Note 14).
We believe that it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits, as of June 30, 2010 could increase tax expense in the next 12 months by $4.0 million (June 30, 2009, decrease by $0.2 million), relating primarily to the expiration of competent authority relief and tax years becoming statute barred for purposes of future tax examinations by local taxing jurisdictions.
Our three most significant tax jurisdictions are Canada, the United States and Germany. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. Tax years that remain open to examinations by local taxing authorities vary by jurisdiction up to ten years.
We are subject to tax examinations in all major taxing jurisdictions in which we operate and currently have examinations open in Canada, the United States, France, and Spain. On a quarterly basis we assess the status of these examinations and the potential for adverse outcomes to determine the adequacy of the provision for income and other taxes.
We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our tax examinations and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, we cannot predict with any level of certainty the exact nature of any future possible settlements.
|
|||
NOTE 13—SPECIAL CHARGES (RECOVERIES)
Special charges are primarily costs related to certain restructuring initiatives that we have undertaken from time to time under our various restructuring plans. In addition, with effect from July 1, 2009, Special charges also include acquisition-related costs with respect to acquisitions made on or after July 1, 2009.
The following tables summarize total Special charges incurred during the periods indicated below:
| Year ended June 30, | ||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
|
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan (cash liability portion) |
$ | 33,799 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
|
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan (share-based compensation expense) |
3,164 | — | — | |||||||
|
Total Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan |
36,963 | — | — | |||||||
|
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan |
2,878 | 14,211 | — | |||||||
|
Other Restructuring Plans* |
— | — | (418 | ) | ||||||
|
Acquisition-related costs |
3,248 | — | — | |||||||
|
Impairment charges and other impacts |
577 | 223 | — | |||||||
|
Total special charges (recoveries) |
$ | 43,666 | $ | 14,434 | $ | (418 | ) | |||
| * | Relates to restructuring plans implemented prior to Fiscal 2008. |
Total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2010 restructuring plan are expected to be approximately $32 million to $40 million, of which $37.0 million has been recorded within Special charges to date. Reconciliations of the liability relating to each of our outstanding restructuring plans are provided hereunder:
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan (cash liability portion)
In the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, our Board approved, and we began to implement, restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate certain excess facilities (Fiscal 2010 restructuring plan). These charges relate to workforce reductions and other miscellaneous direct costs. The provision related to workforce reduction is expected to be paid by December 2010. On a quarterly basis, we will conduct an evaluation of the remaining balances relating to workforce reduction and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for year ended June 30, 2010 is shown below.
|
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan |
Workforce reduction |
Facility costs | Other* | Total | ||||||||||||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Accruals and adjustments |
28,875 | 2,274 | 2,650 | 33,799 | ||||||||||||
|
Cash payments |
(20,068 | ) | (1,057 | ) | (2,650 | ) | (23,775 | ) | ||||||||
|
Noncash draw-downs and foreign exchange |
(76 | ) | 4 | — | (72 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 8,731 | $ | 1,221 | $ | — | $ | 9,952 | ||||||||
| * | Other costs relate to one-time legal and consulting fees incurred on account of an internal reorganization of our international subsidiaries initiated to consolidate our intellectual property within certain jurisdictions and to effect an operational reduction of our global subsidiaries with a view to, eventually, having a single operating legal entity in each jurisdiction (see Note 12). |
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2009, our Board approved, and we began to implement, restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate certain excess facilities (Fiscal 2009 restructuring plan). The total costs incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2009 restructuring were $17.1 million, which has been recorded within Special charges since the commencement of the plan. The $17.1 million charge consisted primarily of costs associated with workforce reduction in the amount of $12.4 million and abandonment of excess facilities in the amount of $4.7 million. The provision related to workforce reduction has been substantially paid and the provision relating to facility costs is expected to be paid by April 2012.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the years ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 are shown below.
|
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan |
Workforce reduction |
Facility costs | Total | |||||||||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | 2,718 | $ | 2,933 | $ | 5,651 | ||||||
|
Accruals and adjustments |
2,158 | 720 | 2,878 | |||||||||
|
Cash payments |
(4,585 | ) | (2,588 | ) | (7,173 | ) | ||||||
|
Noncash draw-downs and foreign exchange |
38 | 563 | 601 | |||||||||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 329 | $ | 1,628 | $ | 1,957 | ||||||
|
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan |
Workforce reduction |
Facility costs | Total | |||||||||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
|
Accruals and adjustments |
10,250 | 3,961 | 14,211 | |||||||||
|
Cash payments |
(7,177 | ) | (1,082 | ) | (8,259 | ) | ||||||
|
Foreign exchange and other adjustments |
(355 | ) | 54 | (301 | ) | |||||||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | 2,718 | $ | 2,933 | $ | 5,651 | ||||||
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan
In the first quarter of Fiscal 2006, our Board approved, and we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate our excess facilities (Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan). These charges related to workforce reductions, abandonment of excess facilities and other miscellaneous direct costs. The total cost incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan was $20.9 million which has been recorded within Special charges since the commencement of the plan. The actions related to workforce reduction were completed as of September 30, 2007. The provisions relating to facility costs are expected to be paid by January 2014.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the years ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 are shown below.
|
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan |
Facility costs | |||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | 259 | ||
|
Accruals and adjustments |
— | |||
|
Cash payments |
(94 | ) | ||
|
Noncash draw-downs and foreign exchange |
6 | |||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 171 | ||
|
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan |
Facility costs | |||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
$ | 906 | ||
|
Accruals and adjustments |
— | |||
|
Cash payments |
(560 | ) | ||
|
Foreign exchange and other adjustments |
(87 | ) | ||
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | 259 | ||
Impairment Charges and Other Impacts
Included within Special charges for the year ended June 30, 2010 is a charge of (i) $0.4 million relating to the write down of certain prepaid royalties in connection with the discontinuance of certain of our product lines, (ii) a charge of $0.5 million, relating to certain capital assets that were written down in connection with various leasehold improvements and redundant office equipment at abandoned facilities, (iii) a charge of $0.3 million relating to an impairment of intangible assets and (iv) a recovery of $0.5 million relating to a reduction in an asset retirement obligation associated with a facility that has been partially vacated.
Included within Special charges for the year ended June 30, 2009 is a charge of $0.2 million relating to certain capital assets that were written down in connection with various leasehold improvements and redundant office equipment at abandoned facilities.
|
|||
NOTE 14—ACQUISITIONS
Fiscal 2010
Burntsand Inc.
On May 27, 2010, we acquired Burntsand Inc. (Burntsand), a provider of technology consulting services for customers with complex information processing and information management requirements, focusing in particular in areas such as ECM, Collaboration and Service Management. Burntsand was based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We believe the acquisition of Burntsand will complement and enhance our current service offerings to further strengthen our position in the ECM market. In accordance with ASC Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Burntsand have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning May 27, 2010.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for Burntsand and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:
|
Cash consideration paid |
$ | 10,792 | |
|
Acquisition related costs (included in Special charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income) for the year ended June 30, 2010 |
$ | 303 | |
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of May 27, 2010 are set forth below:
|
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $2,629) |
$ | 6,627 | ||
|
Long-term assets |
813 | |||
|
Intangible customer assets |
753 | |||
|
Total liabilities assumed |
(2,886 | ) | ||
|
Total identifiable net assets |
5,307 | |||
|
Goodwill |
5,485 | |||
| $ | 10,792 | |||
The factors that impact the deductibility of goodwill are currently being assessed.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $3.3 million. The gross amount receivable was $3.3 million, all of which is expected to be collectible.
The fair value of the acquired intangible customer assets and goodwill is provisional, pending any tax related impacts on the valuations of these items.
The amount of Burntsand’s revenue and net income (loss) included in Open Text’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, and the unaudited pro forma revenue and net income of the combined entity had the acquisition date been consummated as of July 1, 2009 and July 1, 2008, are set forth below:
| Revenue | Net Income (loss) | ||||||
|
Actual from May 27, 2010 to June 30, 2010 |
$ | 1,661 | $ | (513 | ) | ||
| Year ended June 30, | ||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
|
Supplemental Unaudited Pro forma Information |
||||||
|
Total revenues |
$ | 929,033 | $ | 808,449 | ||
|
Net income* |
$ | 83,397 | $ | 56,742 | ||
| * | Included within net income for the periods reported above are the estimated amortization charges relating to the preliminary allocated values of intangible assets. |
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table above is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period presented or the result that may be realized in the future.
Nstein Technologies Inc.
On April 1, 2010, we acquired Nstein Technologies Inc. (Nstein), a software company based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Nstein provides content management solutions which help enterprises centralize, understand and manage large amounts of content. Nstein’s solutions include its patented “Text Mining Engine” which allows users to more easily search through different content and data. We acquired Nstein to leverage and enhance our product offerings. In accordance with ASC Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Nstein have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning April 1, 2010.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for Nstein and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:
|
Equity consideration paid |
$ | 8,548 | |
|
Cash consideration paid |
25,326 | ||
|
Fair value of total consideration transferred |
33,874 | ||
|
Acquisition related costs (included in Special charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income) for the year ended June 30, 2010 |
$ | 958 | |
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of April 1, 2010 are set forth below:
|
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $4,956) |
$ | 13,602 | ||
|
Long-term assets |
10,545 | |||
|
Intangible customer assets |
2,919 | |||
|
Intangible technology assets |
17,310 | |||
|
Total liabilities assumed |
(13,784 | ) | ||
|
Total identifiable net assets |
30,592 | |||
|
Goodwill |
3,282 | |||
| $ | 33,874 | |||
The fair value of Common Shares issued as part of the consideration was CAD $48.39 per share, determined based upon the 10 day volume-weighted average price of Open Text’s Common Shares, as traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, prior to the acquisition date.
The factors that impact the deductibility of goodwill are currently being assessed.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $5.1 million. The gross amount receivable was $6.0 million, of which $0.9 million was expected to be uncollectible.
The fair value of intangible assets and goodwill is provisional, pending any tax related impacts on the valuations of these items.
The amount of Nstein’s revenue and net income (loss) included in Open Text’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, and the unaudited pro forma revenue and net income of the combined entity had the acquisition date been consummated as of July 1, 2009 and July 1, 2008, are set forth below:
| Revenue | Net Income (loss) | ||||||
|
Actual from April 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 |
$ | 4,469 | $ | (2,039 | ) | ||
| Year ended June 30, | ||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
|
Supplemental Unaudited Pro forma Information |
||||||
|
Total revenues |
$ | 925,072 | $ | 807,636 | ||
|
Net income* |
$ | 81,464 | $ | 54,066 | ||
| * | Included within net income for the periods reported above are the estimated amortization charges relating to the preliminary allocated values of intangible assets. |
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table above is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period presented or the result that may be realized in the future.
New Generation Consulting Inc.
On April 16, 2010 we acquired certain miscellaneous assets and liabilities from New Generation Consulting Inc., in the amount of $4.0 million. Of this amount, $0.5 million has been held back and not paid to the seller, and pending the resolution of certain post closing purchase price adjustments, will be paid in and around the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. Of the total purchase price approximately $3.1 million has been allocated to goodwill, $0.4 million to customer intangible assets and the remainder to certain receivables and liabilities assumed.
Vignette Corporation.
On July 21, 2009, we acquired, by way of merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Vignette, an Austin, Texas based company that provides and develops software used for managing and delivering business content. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, each share of common stock of Vignette (not already owned by Open Text) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the merger (July 21, 2009) was converted into the right to receive $8.00 in cash and 0.1447 of one Open Text common share (equivalent to a value of $5.33 as of July 21, 2009). We acquired Vignette to strengthen our ability to offer an expanded portfolio of Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions to further consolidate our position as an independent leader in the ECM marketplace. In accordance with ASC Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Vignette have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning July 22, 2009.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for Vignette and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:
|
Equity consideration paid |
$ | 125,223 | |
|
Cash consideration paid |
182,909 | ||
|
Fair value of total consideration transferred |
308,132 | ||
|
Vignette shares already owned by Open Text through open market purchases (at fair value) |
13,283 | ||
| $ | 321,415 | ||
|
Acquisition related costs (included in Special charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income) for the year ended June 30, 2010 |
$ | 1,931 | |
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of July 21, 2009, are set forth below:
|
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $92,309) |
$ | 171,616 | ||
|
Long-term assets |
17,484 | |||
|
Intangible customer assets |
22,700 | |||
|
Intangible technology assets |
68,200 | |||
|
Total liabilities assumed |
(68,541 | ) | ||
|
Total identifiable net assets |
211,459 | |||
|
Goodwill |
109,956 | |||
| $ | 321,415 | |||
The fair value of Common shares issued as part of the consideration was determined based upon the closing price of Open Text’s common shares on NASDAQ on acquisition date.
The portion of the purchase price allocated to goodwill has been assigned in the ratio of 59%, 35% and 6% to our North America, Europe and Other reporting units, respectively.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $27.1 million. The gross amount receivable was $28.3 million, of which $1.2 million was expected to be uncollectible.
We recognized a gain of $4.4 million as a result of re-measuring to fair value our investment in Vignette held before the date of acquisition. The gain was recognized in “Other income” in our consolidated financial statements during Fiscal 2010.
The amount of Vignette’s revenue and net income included in Open Text’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, and the unaudited pro forma revenue and net income of the combined entity had the acquisition date been consummated as of July 1, 2009 and July 1, 2008, are set forth below. Non-recurring charges of $11.9 million are included in the unaudited pro forma information. These charges relate primarily to one-time business combination and share-based compensation costs incurred by Vignette prior to our acquisition.
| Revenue | Net Income | |||||
|
Actual from July 22, 2009 to June 30, 2010 |
$ | 118,100 | $ | 4,510 | ||
| Year ended June 30, | ||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
|
Supplemental Unaudited Pro forma Information |
||||||
|
Total revenues |
$ | 918,230 | $ | 936,237 | ||
|
Net income* |
$ | 70,213 | $ | 41,509 | ||
| * | Included within net income for the periods reported above are the amortization charges relating to the allocated values of intangible assets. |
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table above is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period presented or the result that may be realized in the future.
Fiscal 2009
Vizible Corporation.
On April 8, 2009 we acquired Vizible Corporation (Vizible), a Toronto-based privately held maker of digital media interface solutions. We acquired Vizible to help expand our suite of digital asset management solutions. Vizible was acquired prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 805 becoming effective for the Company. In accordance with SFAS 141, this acquisition is accounted for as a business combination.
Total purchase consideration for this acquisition was approximately $0.9 million, of which approximately $0.4 million has been allocated to technology assets, $0.3 million has been allocated to deferred tax assets, and the remainder to goodwill.
Captaris Inc.
On October 31, 2008, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Captaris, a provider of software products that automate “document-centric” processes. We acquired Captaris to strengthen our ability to offer an expanded portfolio of solutions that integrate with SAP, Microsoft and Oracle solutions. In accordance with SFAS 141, this acquisition is accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Captaris have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning November 1, 2008.
Total consideration for this acquisition was $102.1 million, which consisted of $101.0 million in cash, net of cash acquired, and approximately $1.1 million of direct acquisition related costs.
Purchase Price Allocation
The purchase price allocation set forth below represents our final allocation of the purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired.
|
Current assets (net of cash acquired of $30,043) |
$ | 28,971 | ||
|
Long-term assets |
26,252 | |||
|
Intangible customer assets |
32,900 | |||
|
Technology assets |
73,600 | |||
|
In-process research and development* |
121 | |||
|
Goodwill |
65,646 | |||
|
Total assets acquired |
227,490 | |||
|
Total liabilities assumed and acquisition-related accruals |
(125,300 | ) | ||
| $ | 102,190 | |||
| * | Included as part of research and development expense in the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
The useful lives of intangible customer assets have been estimated to be between six and eight years. The useful lives of technology assets have been estimated to be between four and five years.
No amount of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The portion of the purchase price allocated to goodwill has been assigned in the ratio of 51%, 37% and 12% to our North America, Europe and Other reporting units, respectively.
As part of the purchase price allocation, we recognized liabilities in connection with this acquisition of approximately $19.4 million relating to employee termination charges, costs relating to abandonment of excess Captaris facilities and accruals for unpaid direct acquisition related costs. This was the result of our management approved and initiated plans to restructure the operations of Captaris by way of workforce reduction and abandonment of excess legacy facilities.
Proforma financial information (unaudited)
The unaudited proforma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined result of Open Text and Captaris, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of July 1, 2008. This information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period presented or the result that may be realized in the future.
The unaudited pro forma information included hereunder does not include the financial impacts of the restructuring initiatives relating to former Captaris activities, as these have been capitalized as part of the preliminary purchase allocation but does include the estimated amortization charges relating to the allocation of values to acquired intangible assets.
| Year ended June 30, 2009 |
|||
|
Total revenues |
$ | 831,793 | |
|
Net income* |
$ | 41,768 | |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.80 | |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.78 | |
| * | Included herein are non-recurring charges in the amount of $9.3 million, recorded by Captaris in relation to business combination costs incurred by Captaris and the acceleration of the vesting of Captaris employee stock options. |
eMotion LLC
In July 2008, we acquired 100% ownership of eMotion LLC (eMotion), a division of Corbis Corporation. eMotion specializes in managing and distributing digital media assets and marketing content. We acquired eMotion to enhance our capabilities in the “digital asset management” market, giving us a broader portfolio of offerings for marketing and advertising agencies, adding capabilities that complement our existing enterprise asset-management solutions. eMotion is based in Seattle, Washington. In accordance with SFAS 141, this acquisition is accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of eMotion have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning July 3, 2008.
Total consideration for this acquisition was $4.4 million which consisted of $4.2 million in cash, net of cash acquired, and approximately $0.2 million in costs directly related to this acquisition. An amount of $0.5 million which was originally accrued and held back, as provided for in the purchase agreement, was released in Fiscal 2010.
Purchase Price Allocation
Under business combination accounting the total purchase price, was allocated to eMotion’s net assets based on their estimated fair values as of July 3, 2008, as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets was recorded as goodwill.
The purchase price allocation set forth below represents our final allocation of the purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired.
|
Current assets |
$ | 648 | ||
|
Long-term assets |
238 | |||
|
Intangible customer assets |
1,411 | |||
|
Technology assets |
2,823 | |||
|
Total assets acquired |
5,120 | |||
|
Liabilities assumed |
(751 | ) | ||
| $ | 4,369 | |||
The useful lives of intangible customer and technology assets have been estimated to be five and seven years, respectively.
Division of Spicer Corporation
In July 2008, we acquired 100% ownership of a division of Spicer Corporation (Spicer), a privately-held company based in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. Spicer specializes in “file format” viewer solutions for desktop applications, integrated business process management systems and reprographics. We acquired a division of Spicer to complement and extend our existing enterprise content management suite, providing flexible document viewing options and enhanced document security functionality. In accordance with SFAS 141, this acquisition is accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Spicer have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning July 1, 2008.
Total consideration for this acquisition was $11.7 million which consisted of $11.4 million in cash, and approximately $0.3 million in costs directly related to this acquisition. In addition, a further amount of $0.2 million has been held back from the purchase price and will be recorded as part of the purchase only upon the resolution of certain contingencies.
Purchase Price Allocation
Under business combination accounting the total purchase price, excluding the amount of $0.2 million which has been held back, was allocated to Spicer’s net assets, based on their estimated fair values as of July 1, 2008, as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets was recorded as goodwill.
The purchase price allocation set forth below represents our final allocation of the purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired.
|
Current assets |
$ | 953 | ||
|
Long-term assets |
23 | |||
|
Intangible customer assets |
1,777 | |||
|
Technology assets |
5,529 | |||
|
Goodwill |
4,791 | |||
|
Total assets acquired |
13,073 | |||
|
Liabilities assumed |
(1,330 | ) | ||
| $ | 11,743 | |||
The useful life of the intangible customer and technology assets has been estimated to be five and seven years, respectively.
The portion of the purchase price allocated to goodwill has been assigned in the ratio of approximately 48% and 52% to our North America and Europe reporting units, respectively, and a portion of it is deductible for tax purposes.
|
|||
NOTE 15—SEGMENT INFORMATION
ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (ASC Topic 280), establishes standards for reporting, by public business enterprises, information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method of determining what information, under ASC Topic 280, to report is based on the way that an entity organizes operating segments for making operational decisions and how the entity’s management and chief operating decision maker (CODM) assess an entity’s financial performance. Our operations are analyzed by management and our CODM as being part of a single industry segment: the design, development, marketing and sales of enterprise content management software and solutions.
The following table sets forth the distribution of revenues, determined by location of customer, by significant geographic area, for the periods indicated:
| Year ended June 30, | |||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
|
Revenues: |
|||||||||
|
Canada |
$ | 70,968 | $ | 53,782 | $ | 55,494 | |||
|
United States |
401,189 | 338,073 | 283,014 | ||||||
|
United Kingdom |
97,756 | 78,575 | 90,385 | ||||||
|
Germany |
114,011 | 126,645 | 116,869 | ||||||
|
Rest of Europe |
161,052 | 146,164 | 142,840 | ||||||
|
All other countries |
67,047 | 42,426 | 36,930 | ||||||
|
Total revenues |
$ | 912,023 | $ | 785,665 | $ | 725,532 | |||
The following table sets forth the distribution of long-lived assets, representing capital assets and intangible assets, by significant geographic area, as of the periods indicated below.
| As of June 30, 2010 |
As of June 30, 2009 |
|||||
|
Long-lived assets: |
||||||
|
Canada |
$ | 69,487 | $ | 53,367 | ||
|
United States |
209,060 | 193,636 | ||||
|
United Kingdom |
24,571 | 27,487 | ||||
|
Germany |
27,607 | 39,942 | ||||
|
Rest of Europe |
33,573 | 41,231 | ||||
|
All other countries |
18,181 | 4,550 | ||||
|
Total |
$ | 382,479 | $ | 360,213 | ||
|
|||
NOTE 16—GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES
We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum annual payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
| Payments due by | |||||||||||||||
| Total | Period ending June 30, 2011 |
July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2013 |
July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2015 |
July 1, 2015 and beyond |
|||||||||||
|
Long-term debt obligations |
$ | 325,074 | $ | 23,267 | $ | 20,956 | $ | 280,851 | $ | — | |||||
|
Operating lease obligations* |
120,372 | 27,091 | 33,377 | 24,419 | 35,485 | ||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations |
6,255 | 4,316 | 1,924 | 15 | — | ||||||||||
| $ | 451,701 | $ | 54,674 | $ | 56,257 | $ | 305,285 | $ | 35,485 | ||||||
| * | Net of $6.6 million of non-cancelable sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to other parties. |
The long-term debt obligations are comprised of interest and principal payments on our term loan agreement and a five-year mortgage on our headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. See Note 10. As of June 30, 2010 there were no borrowings outstanding under our revolver, however if the revolver is drawn down, it would increase our contractual obligations.
We do not enter into off-balance sheet financing arrangements as a matter of practice except for the use of operating leases for office space, computer equipment and vehicles. In accordance with U.S GAAP, neither the lease liability nor the underlying asset is carried on the balance sheet, as the terms of the leases do not meet the criteria for capitalization.
Guarantees and indemnifications
We have entered into license agreements with customers that include limited intellectual property indemnification clauses. Generally, we agree to indemnify our customers against legal claims that our software products infringe certain third party intellectual property rights. In the event of such a claim, we are generally obligated to defend our customers against the claim and either settle the claim at our expense or pay damages that our customers are legally required to pay to the third-party claimant. These intellectual property infringement indemnification clauses generally are subject to limits based upon the amount of the license sale. In Fiscal 2010 we have not made any indemnification payments in relation to these indemnification clauses.
In connection with certain facility leases, we have guaranteed payments on behalf of our subsidiaries either by providing a security deposit with the landlord or through unsecured bank guarantees obtained from local banks.
We have not accrued a liability for guarantees, indemnities or warranties described above in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets since no material payments are expected to be made. The maximum amount of potential future payments under such guarantees, indemnities and warranties is not determinable.
Litigation
We are subject from time to time to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business, and accrue for these items where appropriate. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
|
|||
NOTE 17—SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
| Year ended June 30, | |||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|||||||||
|
Cash paid during the year for interest |
$ | 10,701 | $ | 15,175 | $ | 23,082 | |||
|
Cash received during the year for interest |
$ | 1,141 | $ | 4,245 | $ | 5,641 | |||
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes |
$ | 32,946 | $ | 3,591 | $ | 19,622 | |||
|
|||
NOTE 18—OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Included in Other income (expense) for the year ended June 30, 2010, is primarily transactional foreign exchange losses of approximately $15.4 million, (June 30, 2009 foreign exchange losses of $2.3 million and June 30, 2008 foreign exchange losses of $0.9 million). This amount was offset by a gain of $4.4 million resulting from re-measuring to fair value our investment in Vignette held before the date of acquisition (see Note 14).
|
|||
NOTE 19—NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the shares used in the calculation of basic net income per share plus the dilutive effect of common share equivalents, such as stock options, using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
| Year ended June 30, | |||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
|
Basic earnings per share |
|||||||||
|
Net income |
$ | 87,554 | $ | 56,938 | $ | 53,006 | |||
|
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 1.56 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.04 | |||
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|||||||||
|
Net income |
$ | 87,554 | $ | 56,938 | $ | 53,006 | |||
|
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1.53 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 1.01 | |||
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|||||||||
|
Basic |
56,280 | 52,030 | 50,780 | ||||||
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
1,105 | 1,241 | 1,824 | ||||||
|
Diluted |
57,385 | 53,271 | 52,604 | ||||||
|
Excluded as anti-dilutive* |
577 | 87 | — | ||||||
| * | Represents options to purchase Common Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than or equal to the average price of the Common Shares during the period. |
|
|||
NOTE 20—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our procedure regarding the approval of any related party transaction is that the material facts of such transaction shall be reviewed by the independent members of our Board and the transaction approved by a majority of the independent members of our Board. The Board reviews all transactions wherein we are, or will be a participant and any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Board generally takes into account, among other facts it deems appropriate: whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances; the extent and nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the benefits to the company of the proposed transaction; if applicable, the effects on a director’s independence; and if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable services or products.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, Mr. Stephen Sadler, a director, earned approximately $0.6 million (June 30, 2009 – $0.5 million, June 30, 2008 – $0.08 million), inclusive of bonus fees aggregating $480,000, in consulting fees from Open Text for assistance with acquisition-related business activities. Mr. Sadler abstained from voting on all transactions from which he would potentially derive consulting fees.