UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
| Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): | January 26, 2011 |
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
__________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Florida | 001-13660 | 59-2260678 |
|
_____________________
(State or other jurisdiction |
_____________
(Commission |
______________
(I.R.S. Employer |
| of incorporation) | File Number) | Identification No.) |
| 815 Colorado Avenue, Stuart, Florida | 34994 | |
|
_________________________________
(Address of principal executive offices) |
___________
(Zip Code) |
| Registrants telephone number, including area code: | 772-287-4000 |
Not Applicable
______________________________________________
Former name or former address, if changed since last report
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
On January 26, 2011, the Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida ("Seacoast" or the "Company") announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010.
A copy of the press release announcing Seacoast’s results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010 is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
On January 27, 2011, Seacoast held an investor conference call to discuss its financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010. A transcript of this conference call is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated herein by reference. Also attached as Exhibit 99.3 are charts (available on the Company’s website at www.seacoastbanking.net) containing information used in the conference call and incorporated herein by reference. All information included in the transcript and the charts is presented as of December 31, 2010, and the Company does not assume any obligation to correct or update said information in the future.
The information in Items 2.02 and 7.01, as well as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3, is being furnished and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits
Exhibit
No. Description
99.1 Press Release dated January 26, 2011 with respect to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida’s financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010
99.2 Transcript of Seacoast’s investor conference call held on January 27, 2011 to discuss the Company’s financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010
99.3 Data on website containing information used in the conference call held on January 27, 2011
Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 referenced herein contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements about future financial and operating results, ability to realized deferred tax assets, cost savings, enhanced revenues, economic and seasonal conditions in our markets, and improvements to reported earnings that may be realized from cost controls and for integration of banks that we have acquired, as well as statements with respect to Seacoast’s objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Seacoast to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You should not expect us to update any forward-looking statements.
You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “support”, “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “further”, “point to,” “project,” “could,” “intend” or other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the effects of future economic and market conditions, including seasonality; governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative, tax and regulatory changes; changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, liquidity and the values of loan collateral, securities, and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; interest rate risks, sensitivities and the shape of the yield curve; the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market areas and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet; and the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses. The risks of mergers and acquisitions, include, without limitation: unexpected transaction costs, including the costs of integrating operations; the risks that the businesses will not be integrated successfully or that such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; the potential failure to fully or timely realize expected revenues and revenue synergies, including as the result of revenues following the merger being lower than expected; the risk of deposit and customer attrition; any changes in deposit mix; unexpected operating and other costs, which may differ or change from expectations; the risks of customer and employee loss and business disruption, including, without limitation, as the result of difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees; increased competitive pressures and solicitations of customers by competitors; as well as the difficulties and risks inherent with entering new markets.
All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 under “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors”, and otherwise in our SEC reports and filings. Such reports are available upon request from the Company, or from the Securities and Exchange Commission, including through the SEC’s Internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida | ||||
| January 31, 2011 | By: |
/s/ William R. Hahl
|
||
|
|
||||
| Name: William R. Hahl | ||||
| Title: Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
Description
Press Release dated January 26, 2011 with respect to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida’s financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010
Transcript of Seacoast’s investor conference call held on January 27, 2011 to discuss the Company’s financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010
Data on website containing information used in the conference call held on January 27, 2011
EXHIBIT 99.1
To Form 8-K dated January 26, 2011
NEWS RELEASE
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
Dennis S. Hudson, III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
(772) 288-6085
William R. Hahl
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(772) 221-2825
SEACOAST REPORTS SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS FOR
FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR
| | Revenue growth improved 6.3 percent (annualized, linked-quarter) through low cost deposit growth initiatives and improved fee income through an expanding customer base |
| | Capital remains at record levels with estimated total risk-based capital ratio at year-end of 17.8 percent, up from 15.2 percent a year ago |
| | Credit risk continues to decline with nonperforming loans falling 30.2 percent for the year and other real estate owned declining 20.7 percent from the third quarter |
STUART, FL., January 26, 2011 Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ-NMS: SBCF) today reported a significantly reduced net loss for the fourth quarter of 2010 totaling $10.2 million, compared to $38.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2009. In addition, the net loss was lower for the year 2010 totaling $33.2 million, compared to $146.7 million for 2009. For the year 2009, the net loss was impacted by a $49.8 million goodwill impairment, as well as, much higher provisioning for loan losses. The net loss that is available to Common shareholders for the fourth quarter and the year 2010 totaled, respectively, $11.1 million or $0.12 diluted earnings per share (DEPS), and $37.0 million or $0.48 DEPS. These figures compare to a loss of $0.73 DEPS and $4.74 DEPS a year ago for the same periods, respectively.
The new strategies we implemented in 2010 are gaining traction and driving improved results; the revenue generation of our core business and continued strength of the balance sheet are very positive, said Dennis S. Hudson, III, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. While the decrease in nonperforming assets and credit costs are certainly welcome, we are even more encouraged by the improvement in our operating results, driven by several of our business lines. Mr. Hudson also noted an improving net interest margin, a result of increasing loan production and continued favorable deposit trends which, together with lower credit costs, are expected to lead to profitability in 2011. .
During 2010 we achieved a number of important objectives:
| | Completed and began implementation of a Board-driven strategic plan that features strong organic growth, attractive profitability, and a low risk posture intended to enhance future shareholder value; |
| | Strengthened our capital position following our successful capital raise with gross proceeds of approximately $50 million; |
| | Completed a planned reduction in the size of our residential construction and land development loan portfolio which now totals $14 million, or 1.1 percent of loans outstanding at December 31, 2010; and |
| | Aggressive liquidation plan, which commenced in 2007, has now reduced our loan exposure well below regulatory targets for institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate loans and construction and development loans. |
Seacoast strengthened its capital ratios with the completion of a successful public common stock offering with gross proceeds totaling $50 million in April 2010. The estimated total risk-based capital ratio at year-end increased to 17.8 percent, up from 15.2 percent a year ago. The estimated tangible common equity ratio increased to 5.81 percent at year-end 2010 from 4.79 percent for year-end 2009.
As predicted, Seacoasts focused plan to address the slumping housing market in Florida which the Company implemented well ahead of the industry as a whole has positioned the Bank to be among the first in the state to emerge from the markets negative effects. As a result of loan sales and other aggressive liquidation efforts, aggregate commercial real estate exposure (construction loans and commercial real estate mortgages) has now been reduced to 218 percent of total risk-based capital, which is well below the regulatory threshold of 300 percent for institutions with commercial real estate loan concentrations.
As the plan to strengthen the balance sheet and reduce aggregate credit risk started to produce results upon implementation, the board and executive management began to proactively develop a five year strategic plan, which was completed in the first half of 2010. The Company implemented various components of the plan throughout the year designed to increase profitability and ultimately position Seacoast as a top-tier community bank as measured by low risk, strong organic growth and increased shareholder value.
Revenue achievements for the year and fourth quarter 2010 include:
| | Total revenues (excluding securities gains, net) increased $342,000 linked-quarter to $21.6 million, an increase of 6.3 percent annualized; |
| | Net interest margin of 3.42 percent, up 5 basis points from the fourth quarter 2009 and 7 basis points higher than the third quarter of 2010; |
| | Service charges on deposit accounts increased 20.9 percent linked-quarter annualized; |
| | Debit card income for the year totaled $3.2 million, up $550,000 or 21.0 percent compared to the prior years results, reflecting the growth in new deposit accounts; |
| | Mortgage banking revenues grew as a result of expanded capacity and focused growth initiatives, and increased year-over-year by $158,000 or 37.4 percent for the fourth quarter; |
| | Seacoast was the largest producer of residential mortgage purchase loans in its largest market, the Treasure Coast, for 2010; |
| | Noninterest bearing checking balances totaled 17.7 percent of deposits at year-end compared with 15.1 percent the prior year; |
| | Core deposits (total deposits, excluding time deposits over $100,000 and brokered deposits) comprise 84.5 percent of deposits, versus 80.5 percent a year ago; and |
| | Average cost of deposits totaled 0.76 percent, down 8 basis points from the third quarter of 2010 and 39 basis points lower compared to the prior year. |
Revenue growth improved throughout 2010 as a result of the Companys retail and small business deposit growth initiatives, and improvements in loan production. The impact of these initiatives on fee based revenue was evident throughout the year as noted in the table below.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company completed the sale of its merchant service
business and recorded a $600,000 gain on the sale. Seacoast will now continue to provide these
services to its customers on an outsourced basis. This sale reduced total revenues for the year
and quarter by approximately $200,000, and also reduced outsourced data processing expenses by
nearly the same amount due to the thin margin earned on this business.
Q-4 2010
Q-3 2010
Q-2 2010
Q-1 2010
$
1,590
$
1,511
$
1,452
$
1,372
510
500
491
476
580
654
464
421
325
306
257
286
355
330
310
339
814
810
822
717
75
71
82
93
320
297
310
391
$
4,569
$
4,479
$
4,188
$
4,095
$
114
$
322
$
413
$
465
600
0
0
0
$
5,283
$
4,801
$
4,601
$
4,560
Revenue earned from service charges on deposits, wealth management services, debit card interchange, and marine finance fees all improved linked quarter as a result of seasonal benefits and increased households. For the year, the retail bank added 7,495 new core deposit households, up 1,125 or 17.7 percent from 2009. Retail household growth for the entire year has improved as a result of the Companys retail deposit program and, more recently, expanded efforts to attract new commercial deposit accounts. New household acquisition was particularly strong for the fourth quarter; new personal retail checking relationships opened during the quarter rose 42.1 percent from the same quarter of 2009 and 18.8 percent from the third quarter of 2010. Likewise, new commercial business checking deposit relationships increased by 71.6 percent compared with the same quarter one year ago. Along with the new relationships, our programs have improved market share, increased average services per household and decreased customer attrition.
Nonperforming loans declined by $29.6 million, or 30.2 percent during the year and totaled 5.50 percent of loans outstanding at year-end. Nonperforming loans, which peaked at $154.0 million in the third quarter of 2009, have consistently declined to $68.3 million at year-end 2010, a level last achieved in the first quarter of 2008. The improvement is the result of aggressive liquidation activities and a significant slowing of new problem loan inflows during 2010. Early stage delinquencies (accruing loans 30 89 days past due) remain nominal at 0.41 percent of loans outstanding. The allowance for loan losses remains strong at 3.04 percent, the same as the prior quarter and compared to 3.23 percent at year-end 2009. Other real estate owned (OREO) balances declined by $6.7 million or 20.7 percent from the third quarter as the result of sales and fewer loans foreclosed.
Accruing loans declined by approximately $127.3 million, or 9.8 percent to $1.172 billion for the year which negatively impacted net interest income, but were down only 1.80 percent compared to the third quarter 2010. This is the second consecutive quarter of modest negative loan growth as a result of improving loan production, a slowing of loans moving to nonaccrual status and our tactical focus on growing market share in lower risk customer segments. Should recent trends continue, we expect to see improvements in net interest income in the year ahead.
Core operating expenses (total noninterest expenses less losses on other real estate owned and other asset disposition expenses) were reduced throughout the year as noted in the table below. Noninterest expenses for the quarter totaled $27.8 million and increased $7.0 million from the prior years fourth quarter, entirely due to higher expenses for OREO and other asset dispositions which totaled $9.9 million in the fourth quarter 2010 compared to $2.3 million the prior year. Noninterest expenses for 2010 totaled $90.7 million compared to $81.9 million (excluding goodwill impairment) a year ago, an increase of $8.8 million, all of which was attributable to higher legal and professional fees (including non-recurring consulting fees totaling approximately $2.3 million for development and implementation assistance related to our strategic plan and enterprise risk management projects) and higher expense for OREO and other asset dispositions which totaled $15.8 million for the year 2010, compared to $6.3 million in 2009. Core operating expense was $17.9 million in the fourth quarter, down $859,000 or 4.6% from the third quarter.
Core operating expense trends are presented in the table below:
Q-4 2010
Q-3 2010
Q-2 2010
Q-1 2010
$
6,539
$
6,631
$
6,776
$
6,462
1,153
1,367
1,419
1,778
1,592
1,772
1,852
1,876
321
383
402
399
1,699
1,928
1,911
1,942
609
595
585
609
764
577
913
656
1,783
2,491
1,602
2,101
947
966
1,039
1,006
212
212
246
315
0
0
0
0
2,330
1,886
2,060
2,152
$
17,949
$
18,808
$
18,805
$
19,296
$
8,763
$
849
$
415
$
4,073
1,122
587
0
0
$
27,834
$
20,244
$
19,220
$
23,369
The Company expects to implement further cost saving measures during 2011 that result from an enterprise-wide review of operating efficiencies commencing in the first quarter.
The net interest margin increased by 7 basis points to 3.42 percent in the fourth quarter 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2010 primarily a result of lower nonperforming assets and lower costs for interest bearing liabilities. The net interest margin continues to be negatively impacted by higher levels of overnight liquidity and short-term investments. Interest bearing deposit costs decreased 9 basis points to 0.92 percent during the fourth quarter 2010, and total interest bearing liabilities decreased from 1.09 percent for the third quarter to 1.01 percent in the fourth quarter. The mix in deposits continues to improve, which strengthens the net interest margin, and is a result of our tactical activities designed to attract, on-board and retain new household relationships.
The Company will host a conference call on Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) to discuss its earnings results and business trends. Investors may call in (toll-free) by dialing (888) 517-2464 (access code: 5785075; leader: Dennis S. Hudson). Charts will be used during the conference call and may be accessed at Seacoasts website at www.seacoastbanking.net by selecting Presentations under the heading Investor Services. A replay of the conference call will be available beginning the afternoon of January 27 by dialing (877) 213-9653 (domestic), using the passcode 5785075.
Alternatively, individuals may listen to the live webcast of the presentation by visiting the Companys website at www.seacoastbanking.net . The link to the live audio webcast is located in the subsection Presentations under the heading Investor Services. Beginning the afternoon of January 27, 2011, an archived version of the webcast can be accessed from this same subsection of the website. This webcast will be archived and available for one year.
Seacoast, with approximately $2.0 billion in assets, is one of the largest independent commercial banking organizations in Florida. Seacoast has 39 offices in South and Central Florida and is headquartered on Floridas Treasure Coast, which is one of the wealthiest areas in the nation.
______________________________________________________________________________
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements about future financial and operating results, ability to realized deferred tax assets, cost savings, enhanced revenues, economic and seasonal conditions in our markets, and improvements to reported earnings that may be realized from cost controls and for integration of banks that we have acquired, as well as statements with respect to Seacoasts objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Seacoast to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You should not expect us to update any forward-looking statements.
You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as may, will, anticipate, assume, should, support, indicate, would, believe, contemplate, expect, estimate, continue, further, point to, project, could, intend or other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the effects of future economic and market conditions, including seasonality; economic impacts of value declines for collateral that secures our loans, governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative, tax and regulatory changes; changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, liquidity and the values of loan collateral, securities, and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; interest rate risks, sensitivities and the shape of the yield curve; the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market areas and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet; and the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses. The risks of mergers and acquisitions, include, without limitation: unexpected transaction costs, including the costs of integrating operations; the risks that the businesses will not be integrated successfully or that such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; the potential failure to fully or timely realize expected revenues and revenue synergies, including as the result of revenues following the merger being lower than expected; the risk of deposit and customer attrition; any changes in deposit mix; unexpected operating and other costs, which may differ or change from expectations; the risks of customer and employee loss and business disruption, including, without limitation, as the result of difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees; increased competitive pressures and solicitations of customers by competitors; as well as the difficulties and risks inherent with entering new markets.
All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their
entirety by this cautionary notice, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties
described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under Special
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors, and otherwise in our
SEC reports and filings. Such reports are available upon request from the Company, or from the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including through the SECs Internet website at
http://www.sec.gov
.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(Unaudited)
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
Three Months Ended
Twelve Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands,
December 31,
December 31,
except per share data)
2010
2009
2010
2009
$
(10,205
)
$
(38,149
)
$
(33,203
)
$
(146,686
)
(11,142
)
(39,086
)
(36,951
)
(150,434
)
16,379
17,518
66,485
73,847
(2.01
)%
(6.91
)%
(1.60
)%
(6.58
)%
(1.99
)
(6.89
)
(1.57
)
(4.37
)
(23.31
)
(84.51
)
(19.30
)
(73.79
)
3.42
3.37
3.37
3.55
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.73
)
$
(0.48
)
$
(4.74
)
(0.12
)
(0.73
)
(0.48
)
(4.74
)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
| (1) | Calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using amortized cost. |
| (2) | These ratios are stated on an annualized basis and are not necessarily indicative of future periods. |
| (3) | The calculations of ROA and ROE do not include the mark-to-market unrealized gains (losses) because the unrealized gains (losses) are not included in net income (loss). |
| (4) | The Company believes that return on average assets and equity excluding the impacts of noncash amortization expense on intangible assets is a better measurement of the Companys trend in earnings growth. |
| (5) | The Company defines tangible common equity as total shareholders equity less preferred stock and intangible assets. |
| (6) | The ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP ratio used by the investment community to measure capital adequacy. |
| FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | (unaudited) (contd) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| SEACOAST BANKING | CORPORATION OF | FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, | December 31, | Increase/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| except per share data) | 2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Credit Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs year-to-date
|
$ | 39,128 | $ | 108,963 | (64.1 | ) | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs to average loans
|
2.95 | % | 6.86 | % | (57.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Loan loss provision year-to-date
|
$ | 31,680 | $ | 124,767 | (74.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance to loans at end of period
|
3.04 | % | 3.23 | % | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Nonperforming loans
|
$ | 68,284 | $ | 97,876 | (30.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other real estate owned
|
25,697 | 25,385 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
$ | 93,981 | $ | 123,261 | (23.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructured loans (accruing)
|
$ | 66,350 | $ | 57,433 | 15.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Nonperforming assets to loans and other real
estate
owned at end of period
|
7.42 | % | 8.66 | % | (14.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets
|
4.66 | 5.73 | (18.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Selected Financial Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 2,016,381 | $ | 2,151,315 | (6.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities available for sale (at fair value)
|
435,140 | 393,648 | 10.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities held for investment (at amortized
cost)
|
26,861 | 17,087 | 57.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loans
|
1,202,864 | 1,352,311 | (11.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
1,637,228 | 1,779,434 | (8.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total shareholders equity
|
166,299 | 151,935 | 9.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shareholders equity
|
120,051 | 106,936 | 12.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Book value per share common
|
1.28 | 1.82 | (29.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tangible book value per share
|
1.75 | 2.51 | (30.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tangible common book value per share (5)
|
1.25 | 1.75 | (28.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average shareholders equity to average assets
|
8.27 | % | 8.92 | % | (7.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Tangible common equity to tangible assets (5),(6)
|
5.81 | 4.79 | 21.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average Balances (Year-to-Date)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 2,080,570 | $ | 2,228,418 | (6.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Less: intangible assets
|
3,580 | 29,446 | (87.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total average tangible assets
|
$ | 2,076,990 | $ | 2,198,972 | (5.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total equity
|
$ | 172,022 | $ | 198,798 | (13.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Less: intangible assets
|
3,580 | 29,446 | (87.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total average tangible equity
|
168,442 | $ | 169,352 | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using amortized cost. |
| (2) | These ratios are stated on an annualized basis and are not necessarily indicative of future periods. |
| (3) | The calculations of ROA and ROE do not include the mark-to-market unrealized gains (losses) because the unrealized gains (losses) are not included in net income (loss). |
| (4) | The Company believes that return on average assets and equity excluding the impacts of noncash amortization expense on intangible assets is a better measurement of the Companys trend in earnings growth. |
| (5) | The Company defines tangible common equity as total shareholders equity less preferred stock and intangible assets. |
| (6) | The ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP ratio used by the investment community to measure capital adequacy. |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) |
|
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
| Three Months Ended | For The Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2010 | 2009 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest on securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taxable
|
$ | 3,484 | $ | 3,862 | $ | 13,881 | $ | 16,357 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nontaxable
|
40 | 72 | 227 | 305 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
16,503 | 19,248 | 69,454 | 84,882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest on federal funds sold and other investments
|
216 | 241 | 979 | 661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Interest Income
|
20,243 | 23,423 | 84,541 | 102,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest on deposits
|
609 | 1,247 | 3,952 | 6,031 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest on time certificates
|
2,547 | 3,936 | 11,345 | 18,749 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest on borrowed money
|
766 | 796 | 3,032 | 3,836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Interest Expense
|
3,922 | 5,979 | 18,329 | 28,616 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Income
|
16,321 | 17,444 | 66,212 | 73,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
3,975 | 41,514 | 31,680 | 124,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Interest Income (Loss) After Provision for Loan Losses
|
12,346 | (24,070 | ) | 34,532 | (51,178 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
1,590 | 1,612 | 5,925 | 6,491 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trust income
|
510 | 543 | 1,977 | 2,098 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage banking fees
|
580 | 422 | 2,119 | 1,746 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Brokerage commissions and fees
|
325 | 321 | 1,174 | 1,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marine finance fees
|
355 | 228 | 1,334 | 1,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Debit card income
|
814 | 658 | 3,163 | 2,613 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other deposit based EFT fees
|
75 | 79 | 321 | 331 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merchant income
|
114 | 409 | 1,314 | 1,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
920 | 329 | 1,918 | 1,403 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
5,283 | 4,601 | 19,245 | 19,015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities gains, net
|
0 | 2,188 | 3,687 | 5,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Noninterest Income
|
5,283 | 6,789 | 22,932 | 24,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Salaries and wages
|
6,539 | 6,446 | 26,408 | 26,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Employee benefits
|
1,153 | 1,228 | 5,717 | 6,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outsourced data processing costs
|
1,592 | 1,741 | 7,092 | 7,143 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Telephone / data lines
|
321 | 420 | 1,505 | 1,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Occupancy
|
1,699 | 1,977 | 7,480 | 8,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Furniture and equipment
|
609 | 645 | 2,398 | 2,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marketing
|
764 | 519 | 2,910 | 2,067 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Legal and professional fees
|
1,783 | 2,336 | 7,977 | 6,984 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FDIC assessments
|
947 | 1,042 | 3,958 | 4,952 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
212 | 315 | 985 | 1,259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asset dispositions expense
|
1,122 | 195 | 2,268 | 1,172 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss on other real estate owned and
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
repossessed assets
|
8,763 | 2,125 | 13,541 | 5,155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill impairment
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 49,813 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
2,330 | 1,879 | 8,428 | 7,656 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Noninterest Expenses
|
27,834 | 20,868 | 90,667 | 131,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss Before Income Taxes
|
(10,205 | ) | (38,149 | ) | (33,203 | ) | (158,511 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
0 | 0 | 0 | (11,825 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Loss
|
(10,205 | ) | (38,149 | ) | (33,203 | ) | (146,686 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock Dividends and Accretion on
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock Discount
|
937 | 937 | 3,748 | 3,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Loss Available to Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders
|
$ | (11,142 | ) | $ | (39,086 | ) | $ | (36,951 | ) | $ | (150,434 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Per share common stock:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss diluted
|
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.73 | ) | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (4.74 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss basic
|
(0.12 | ) | (0.73 | ) | (0.48 | ) | (4.74 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends declared
|
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average diluted shares outstanding
|
93,426,748 | 53,790,905 | 76,561,692 | 31,733,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average basic shares outstanding
|
93,426,748 | 53,790,905 | 76,561,692 | 31,733,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) |
|
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and due from banks
|
$ | 35,358 | $ | 32,200 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Interest bearing deposits with other banks
|
176,047 | 182,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
211,405 | 215,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Available for sale (at fair value)
|
435,140 | 393,648 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Held for investment (at amortized cost)
|
26,861 | 17,087 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Securities
|
462,001 | 410,735 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans available for sale
|
12,519 | 18,412 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
1,240,608 | 1,397,503 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
(37,744 | ) | (45,192 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Loans
|
1,202,864 | 1,352,311 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bank premises and equipment, net
|
36,045 | 38,932 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other real estate owned
|
25,697 | 25,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
3,137 | 4,121 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
62,713 | 86,319 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
$ | 2,016,381 | $ | 2,151,315 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Demand deposits (noninterest bearing)
|
$ | 289,621 | $ | 268,789 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Savings deposits
|
812,625 | 838,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other time deposits
|
281,681 | 326,070 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Brokered time certificates
|
7,093 | 38,656 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Time certificates of $100,000 or more
|
246,208 | 307,631 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Deposits
|
1,637,228 | 1,779,434 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase,
maturing within 30 days
|
98,213 | 105,673 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowed funds
|
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Subordinated debt
|
53,610 | 53,610 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
11,031 | 10,663 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1,850,082 | 1,999,380 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred stock Series A
|
46,248 | 44,999 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock
|
9,349 | 5,887 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional paid in capital
|
221,522 | 178,096 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
(112,652 | ) | (78,200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Treasury stock
|
(1 | ) | (855 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
164,466 | 149,927 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gain, net
|
1,833 | 2,008 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
166,299 | 151,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
$ | 2,016,381 | $ | 2,151,315 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Shares Outstanding
|
93,487,581 | 58,867,229 |
Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date.
CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited)
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERS
2010
Last 12
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Months
$
(10,205
)
$
(7,638
)
$
(13,796
)
$
(1,564
)
$
(33,203
)
Return on average assets-GAAP basis (2),(3)
(2.01
)
%
(1.47
)
%
(2.61
)
%
(0.30
)
%
(1.60
)
%
Return on average tangible assets (2),(3),(4)
(1.99
)
(1.44
)
(2.58
)
(0.26
)
(1.57
)
(23.31
)
(16.63
)
(30.73
)
(4.18
)
(19.30
)
3.42
3.35
3.27
3.48
3.37
8.63
8.83
8.49
7.13
8.27
$
4,678
$
10,700
$
20,209
3,541
$
39,128
1.47
%
3.29
%
5.95
%
1.03
%
2.95
%
$
3,975
$
8,866
$
16,771
$
2,068
$
31,680
3.04
%
3.04
%
3.10
%
3.18
%
$
66,350
$
64,403
$
64,876
$
60,032
$
68,284
$
69,519
$
90,885
$
96,321
25,697
32,406
19,018
19,076
$
93,981
$
101,925
$
109,903
$
115,397
7.42
%
7.87
%
8.33
%
8.29
%
4.66
5.06
5.25
5.44
5.50
5.50
6.99
7.03
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.09
)
$
(0.25
)
$
(0.04
)
$
(0.48
)
(0.12
)
(0.09
)
(0.25
)
(0.04
)
(0.48
)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.28
1.43
1.51
1.80
$
2,013,405
$
2,062,857
$
2,120,388
$
2,127,074
3,239
3,452
3,669
3,969
$
2,010,166
$
2,059,405
$
2,116,719
$
2,123,105
$
173,707
$
182,202
$
180,093
$
151,731
3,239
3,452
3,669
3,969
$
170,468
$
178,750
$
176,424
$
147,762
| (1) | Calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using amortized cost. |
| (2) | These ratios are stated on an annualized basis and are not necessarily indicative of future periods. |
| (3) | The calculations of ROA and ROE do not include the mark-to-market unrealized gains (losses) because the unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities are not included in net income (loss). |
| (4) | The Company believes that return on average assets and equity excluding the impacts of noncash amortization expense on intangible assets is a better measurement of the Companys trend in earnings growth. |
1
| CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited) |
|
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
(Dollars in thousands)
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
| SECURITIES | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
|
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government Agencies
|
$ | 4,212 | $ | 3,688 | ||||
|
Mortgage-backed
|
426,477 | 384,864 | ||||||
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
1,709 | 2,063 | ||||||
|
Other securities
|
2,742 | 3,033 | ||||||
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
435,140 | 393,648 | ||||||
|
Mortgage-backed
|
18,963 | 12,853 | ||||||
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
7,398 | 4,234 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Other securities
|
500 | 0 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Securities Held for Investment
|
26,861 | 17,087 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Securities
|
$ | 462,001 | $ | 410,735 | ||||
|
|
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
| LOANS | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
|
Construction and land development
|
$ | 79,306 | $ | 162,868 | ||||||||
|
Real estate mortgage
|
1,060,597 | 1,109,077 | ||||||||||
|
Installment loans to individuals
|
51,602 | 64,024 | ||||||||||
|
Commercial and financial
|
48,825 | 61,058 | ||||||||||
|
Other loans
|
278 | 476 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total Loans
|
$ | 1,240,608 | $ | 1,397,503 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
2
3
(1) On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed on an annualized
basis using amortized cost. Fees on loans have been included in interest on loans. Nonaccrual
loans are included in loan balances.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS AND RATES (1)
(Unaudited)
2010
2009
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Average
Yield/
Average
Yield/
Average
Yield/
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
$
446,081
3.12
%
$
402,970
3.32
%
$
368,830
4.19
%
4,293
5.59
5,463
6.81
6,393
6.76
450,374
3.15
408,433
3.37
375,223
4.23
187,023
0.46
259,492
0.39
211,685
0.45
1,263,237
5.19
1,291,879
5.29
1,478,126
5.18
1,900,634
4.24
1,959,804
4.23
2,065,034
4.51
Allowance for loan losses
(39,443
)
(40,434
)
(41,662)
33,024
27,311
34,553
36,460
37,421
41,872
82,730
78,755
89,902
$
2,013,405
$
2,062,857
$2,189,699
$
49,548
0.24
%
$
73,188
0.28
%
$
53,109
0.52
%
110,382
0.11
107,241
0.15
101,005
0.24
662,315
0.33
675,273
0.46
654,250
0.68
537,772
1.88
556,395
1.94
710,955
2.20
83,183
0.27
75,085
0.29
92,466
0.25
103,610
2.72
103,610
2.80
110,479
2.64
1,546,810
1.01
1,590,792
1.09
1,722,264
1.38
280,412
278,424
275,589
12,476
11,439
12,753
1,839,698
1,880,655
2,010,606
173,707
182,202
179,093
$
2,013,405
$
2,062,857
$2,189,699
Interest expense as a % of earning assets
0.82
%
0.89
%
1.15
%
Net interest income as a % of earning assets
3.42
3.35
3.37
QUARTERLY TRENDS LOANS AT END OF PERIOD
(Dollars in Millions) (Unaudited)
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
2009
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
Construction and Land Development
Residential:
Condominiums
>$4 million
$
8.4
$
7.9
$
5.3
$
-
7.9
8.8
3.7
6.1
Town homes
>$4 million
-
-
-
-
4.2
2.3
Single Family
Residences
>$4 million
6.6
6.5
-
-
13.9
10.3
7.1
4.1
Single Family Land &
Lots
21.8
21.8
5.9
5.9
29.6
21.5
19.5
16.6
Multifamily
>$4 million
7.8
7.8
6.6
6.6
17.0
9.8
9.5
8.3
TOTAL
44.6
44.0
17.8
12.5
TOTAL
72.6
52.7
39.8
35.1
GRAND TOTAL
$
117.2
$
96.7
$
57.6
$
47.6
QUARTERLY TRENDS LOANS AT END OF PERIOD
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Millions)
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES
2010
Nonperforming
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
4th Qtr
Number
Construction and Land Development
Residential:
Condominiums
>$4 million
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
-
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
Town homes
>$4 million
-
-
-
-
-
-
Single Family
Residences
>$4 million
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.9
3.6
3.8
Single Family
Land & Lots
>$4 million
5.9
5.9
-
-
-
-
15.7
9.6
10.3
7.0
0.2
4
Multifamily
>$4 million
6.6
4.3
-
-
-
-
8.1
8.2
6.3
6.1
1.1
2
TOTAL
12.5
10.2
TOTAL
28.6
22.3
21.3
14.0
2.2
7
GRAND TOTAL
$
41.1
$
32.5
$
21.3
$
14.0
$
2.2
7
QUARTERLY TRENDS LOANS AT END OF PERIOD
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Millions)
2009
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
$
16.3
$
16.8
$
9.0
$
6.1
4.2
2.3
20.5
16.7
7.1
4.1
51.4
43.3
25.4
22.6
24.8
17.6
16.1
14.8
117.2
96.7
57.6
47.6
17.4
13.8
13.8
13.9
70.0
55.9
23.0
3.9
60.9
51.2
50.8
45.6
9.0
8.5
8.2
2.5
5.7
6.0
4.8
4.8
0.6
31.6
30.0
28.1
6.8
6.2
1.4
201.4
166.8
128.7
77.5
34.0
32.4
30.7
29.3
16.2
11.8
11.1
8.5
50.2
44.2
41.8
37.8
368.8
307.7
228.1
162.9
333.1
328.0
325.9
289.4
90.8
90.6
89.5
88.6
85.5
83.8
83.9
86.8
60.3
60.1
59.7
60.1
569.7
562.5
559.0
524.9
140.6
141.6
144.2
132.3
109.1
120.0
151.4
164.6
95.3
93.0
89.3
88.4
28.3
30.9
25.4
24.7
34.8
34.6
30.8
29.6
1.7
1.4
3.3
3.0
27.2
31.7
35.1
29.7
3.0
5.6
5.6
5.4
26.3
26.3
25.6
25.5
6.1
5.1
5.0
4.7
8.2
11.8
12.0
11.7
23.3
23.2
22.8
22.1
18.1
18.0
5.9
15.8
24.9
29.6
28.1
26.6
546.9
572.8
584.5
584.1
1,116.6
1,135.3
1,143.5
1,109.0
75.5
71.8
66.0
61.1
19.4
18.0
16.6
15.3
26.3
26.9
26.8
26.4
25.7
24.3
23.3
22.3
71.4
69.2
66.7
64.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
$
1,632.6
$
1,584.3
$
1,504.6
$
1,397.5
QUARTERLY TRENDS LOANS AT END OF PERIOD (continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Millions)
2010
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
$
0.9
$
0.9
$
0.9
$
0.9
3.9
3.6
3.8
21.6
15.5
10.3
7.0
14.7
12.5
6.3
6.1
41.1
32.5
21.3
14.0
13.7
3.9
45.7
38.5
35.1
33.6
2.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
6.8
72.6
38.8
35.4
33.8
28.9
27.4
26.3
24.4
8.7
8.2
9.1
7.1
37.6
35.6
35.4
31.5
151.3
106.9
92.1
79.3
290.5
295.9
300.9
303.3
87.6
86.0
84.1
82.6
89.1
79.0
74.4
73.4
60.1
58.8
58.4
57.7
527.3
519.7
517.8
517.0
131.1
128.2
122.9
122.0
163.5
155.9
152.0
151.5
81.7
84.0
79.8
78.0
29.1
29.4
29.0
30.0
29.1
28.5
29.4
28.8
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
25.3
23.6
23.2
22.4
5.3
2.6
2.6
2.5
23.5
23.4
22.1
21.9
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.5
11.4
10.8
10.7
10.6
22.3
21.0
18.9
18.6
15.7
22.2
22.1
21.9
25.3
25.6
26.8
28.0
571.0
562.8
546.9
543.6
1,098.3
1,082.5
1,064.7
1,060.6
62.1
49.9
54.0
48.8
14.4
12.9
11.6
10.9
25.3
27.3
19.7
19.8
21.7
20.8
20.9
20.9
61.4
61.0
52.2
51.6
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
$
1,373.3
$
1,300.6
$
1,263.3
$
1,240.6
QUARTERLY TRENDS INCREASE (DECREASE) IN LOANS BY QUARTER
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Millions)
2009
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
$
(1.1
)
$
0.4
$
(7.7
)
$
(2.9
)
(1.9
)
(1.9
)
(2.3
)
(6.3
)
(3.7
)
(9.7
)
(3.0
)
(1.4
)
(8.1
)
(17.9
)
(2.9
)
(2.0
)
(7.2
)
(1.5
)
(1.2
)
(12.7
)
(20.5
)
(39.1
)
(10.0
)
0.1
(3.6
)
0.1
1.3
(14.1
)
(32.9
)
(19.1
)
(12.4
)
(9.7
)
(0.4
)
(5.2
)
(4.3
)
(0.5
)
(0.3
)
(5.7
)
5.7
0.3
(1.2
)
0.6
(0.6
)
0.9
(1.6
)
(1.9
)
(21.3
)
0.2
(4.8
)
(1.4
)
(7.9
)
(34.6
)
(38.1
)
(51.2
)
(1.7
)
(1.6
)
(1.7
)
(1.4
)
(4.1
)
(4.4
)
(0.7
)
(2.6
)
(5.8
)
(6.0
)
(2.4
)
(4.0
)
(26.4
)
(61.1
)
(79.6
)
(65.2
)
4.1
(5.1
)
(2.1
)
(36.5
)
(4.7
)
(0.2
)
(1.1
)
(0.9
)
0.7
(1.7
)
0.1
2.9
1.8
(0.2
)
(0.4
)
0.4
1.9
(7.2
)
(3.5
)
(34.1
)
(5.8
)
1.0
2.6
(11.9
)
(2.8
)
10.9
31.4
13.2
0.6
(2.3
)
(3.7
)
(0.9
)
(0.9
)
2.6
(5.5
)
(0.7
)
(0.4
)
(0.2
)
(3.8
)
(1.2
)
(0.3
)
1.9
(0.3
)
4.5
3.4
(5.4
)
2.6
(0.2
)
(0.3
)
(0.7
)
(0.1
)
(0.1
)
(1.0
)
(0.1
)
(0.3
)
(0.3
)
3.6
0.2
(0.3
)
(0.2
)
(0.1
)
(0.4
)
(0.7
)
(0.1
)
(0.1
)
(12.1
)
9.9
(0.5
)
4.7
(1.5
)
(1.5
)
(10.8
)
25.9
11.7
(0.4
)
(8.9
)
18.7
8.2
(34.5
)
(7.3
)
(3.7
)
(5.8
)
(4.9
)
(1.4
)
(1.4
)
(1.4
)
(1.3
)
0.3
0.6
(0.1
)
(0.4
)
(0.4
)
(1.4
)
(1.0
)
(1.0
)
(1.5
)
(2.2
)
(2.5
)
(2.7
)
0.2
$
(44.1
)
$
(48.3
)
$
(79.7
)
$
(107.1
)
QUARTERLY TRENDS INCREASE (DECREASE) IN LOANS BY QUARTER (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Millions)
2010
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
$
(5.2
)
$
$
$
(0.2
)
(0.3
)
0.2
(3.8
)
(0.9
)
(6.1
)
(5.2
)
(3.3
)
(0.2
)
(2.2
)
(6.2
)
(0.2
)
(6.5
)
(8.6
)
(11.2
)
(7.3
)
(0.2
)
(13.7
)
(3.9
)
0.1
(7.2
)
(3.4
)
(1.5
)
(2.2
)
(0.3
)
(4.8
)
0.2
(6.8
)
(4.9
)
(33.8
)
(3.4
)
(1.6
)
(0.4
)
(1.5
)
(1.1
)
(1.9
)
0.2
(0.5
)
0.9
(2.0
)
(0.2
)
(2.0
)
(0.2
)
(3.9
)
(11.6
)
(44.4
)
(14.8
)
(12.8
)
1.1
5.4
5.0
2.4
(1.0
)
(1.6
)
(1.9
)
(1.5
)
2.3
(10.1
)
(4.6
)
(1.0
)
(1.3
)
(0.4
)
(0.7
)
2.4
(7.6
)
(1.9
)
(0.8
)
(1.2
)
(2.9
)
(5.3
)
(0.9
)
(1.1
)
(7.6
)
(3.9
)
(0.5
)
(6.7
)
2.3
(4.2
)
(1.8
)
4.4
0.3
(0.4
)
1.0
(0.5
)
(0.6
)
0.9
(0.6
)
(0.1
)
(4.4
)
(1.7
)
(0.4
)
(0.8
)
(0.1
)
(2.7
)
(0.1
)
(2.0
)
(0.1
)
(1.3
)
(0.2
)
(0.1
)
(0.1
)
(0.3
)
(0.6
)
(0.1
)
(0.1
)
0.2
(1.3
)
(2.1
)
(0.3
)
(0.1
)
6.5
(0.1
)
(0.2
)
(1.3
)
0.3
1.2
1.2
(13.1
)
(8.2
)
(15.9
)
(3.3
)
(10.7
)
(15.8
)
(17.8
)
(4.1
)
1.0
(12.2
)
4.1
(5.2
)
(0.9
)
(1.5
)
(1.3
)
(0.7
)
(1.1
)
2.0
(7.6
)
0.1
(0.6
)
(0.9
)
0.1
(2.6
)
(0.4
)
(8.8
)
(0.6
)
(0.3
)
0.1
$
(24.2
)
$
(72.7
)
$
(37.3
)
$
(22.7
)
EXHIBIT 99.2
To Form 8-K dated January 26, 2011
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2010 Earnings Conference Call
January 27, 2011
9:00 AM Eastern Time
Operator:
Welcome to the Fourth Quarter and Year End 2010 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Sandra, and I will be your operator for todays call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded.
I will now turn the call over to Mr. Dennis S. Hudson. Mr. Hudson, you may begin, sir.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Thank you very much, Sandra, and welcome to our Seacoast Fourth Quarter Conference Call.
As always, before we begin, we will direct your attention to the statement contained at the end of our press release last night regarding forward statements. During this call, we will be discussing issues that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Act and accordingly our comments are intended to be covered within the meaning of Section 27A of that Act.
With me is today is Jean Strickland, our President; Russ Holland, our Chief Lending Officer; and Bill Hahl, our CFO.
We are very pleased to report continued progress this quarter; and in fact, we are very pleased with our revenue improvements and overhead improvements, which have been particularly strong in the second half of the year.
But before we discuss the factors that are producing these improvements, as well as our outlook for 2011, I want to comment on the year that just closed out and how our progress in 2010 will support our return to profitability in 2011.
Throughout 2010, we progressed forward in our effort to reduce aggregate credit risk in the balance sheet. Our targeted plan to reduce loan concentrations, and as I said in our July conference call, by focusing our liquidation efforts on our larger problem loan exposures and larger concentrations in 2009, we are now seeing problem loan inflows pace slower and the inflow is comprised of smaller loans. At the time of our call back in July, I also said that we believe our problem loan exposure peaked in the third quarter of 2009, and our belief was supported with a continued decline in the level of classified loans. As a result, I also said that we expected to see a moderation of new problem loans. Well, our nonperforming loans declined each quarter throughout the year in 2010. Nonperforming loans declined by 23.5 percent in the third quarter on a linked basis to $69.5 million, and then fell to $68 million in the fourth quarter, compared with a peak level of $154 million in the third quarter of 2009. Nonperforming loans at year-end represented a decline of 56 percent from the peak and a decline of 30 percent for the year. Other real estate owned did in fact grow throughout the year, as I said it would during our first quarter call, but then declined 21 percent on a linked-quarter basis to $25.7 million at year-end as we continued our problem asset liquidation effort.
Earnings results for the year 2010 were lumpy, again something I said we should expect during our first quarter call, including this quarter with our loss of $10 million. The lumpy results were due entirely as we predicted to losses associated with the sale of OREO (other real estate owned) and asset dispositions, particularly in the first and final quarters of 2010.
Our success in managing down our credit risk will now begin to support our return to profitability. A reduction in aggregate credit risk, combined with signs of stability in the local economy, means fewer new problem loans and improved credit migration trends, and thats exactly what we are now seeing. I would say the real news here today is that what started out as hopeful signs of improvement in early 2010 have now emerged as real trends, trends we expect to continue.
As I now look at the liquidation work ahead of us, it will be very different than that of the past two years. First of all, our C&D loan exposure, which drove the bulk of our losses, has been all but eliminated. Second, further bulk loan sales are no longer needed to muscle down aggregate credit risk. And third, credit charge-offs primarily come from new problem inflows; and given that those inflows are now much reduced and are in asset classes with lower loss potential, we fully expect credit losses to continue to moderate. The assets that remain have generally received credit marks that reflect current conditions. This doesnt mean we have eliminated the risk brought on by current conditions, because conditions remain weak, but we do expect to see improved credit costs and continued improvements in credit quality in the next quarter and throughout 2011.
Now back to my opening comments regarding revenues and overhead. We reported very positive improvements in revenue growth last quarter and this trend continued into the final quarter of 2010. This growth occurred across the board and is a result of our focused efforts to accelerate household growth and market share. Bill is going to speak to some of the details, but Im particularly pleased with the growth in fees given the new regulatory fee restrictions that were put in place and impacted our final quarter.
Moving to overhead, core operating expenses, which totaled $19.3 million in the first quarter of 2010, were reduced 7 percent to $17.9 million in the final quarter of the year. These positive trends relating to revenues and positive trends relating to overhead, together with positive trends relating to asset quality and credit costs, support our belief that we can now begin to return to profitability in 2011 provided the overall economic outlook remains stable, as we think it will.
Im now going to turn the call over to Bill for a few comments, and then well conclude with some questions.
William R. Hahl:
Thank you, Denny; and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the call today. Weve posted a few slides for the call on our website for your reference. Ill quickly review some of the highlights from our results and then turn the call back to Denny and well take your questions.
Overall, our results for 2010 were driven by steadily improving credit trends that saw net charge-offs fall $70 million to $39.1 million, or 295 basis points of average loans, and provisioning for loan losses fell $93 million to $31.7 million. NPLs fell by 30 percent to $68.3 million compared to the prior year. Taken together, these two factors contributed significantly to our year-over-year earnings improvement. Encouragingly, fourth quarter loan production in our consumer, residential and commercial loan portfolios resulted in only a 1.8 percent decline in accruing loans linked-quarter. Additionally, expansion of the net interest margin, coupled with good expense control, contributed to improving operating efficiencies; and higher deposit household acquisitions enabled our retail bank to offset the reduction in consumer service charges that Denny mentioned during the mid-year implementation of changes to Reg E.
Included in GAAP earnings for 2010 were credit-related expenses related to elevated nonperforming asset management costs and direct costs to manage these assets and combined totaled $17.8 million for the year compared to $6.3 million for 2009. Additionally, noncore operating expenses for professional fees related to the assistance in developing the Companys new strategic plan and new risk management system of $2.3 million are also included in GAAP noninterest expenses. Without these costs and on a comparable basis, overhead for the year 2010 declined by $2.7 million compared to the prior year.
Next, Id like to cover a few highlights from the balance sheet and the income statement. Taxable equivalent net interest income was $16.4 million for the fourth quarter, slightly lower than the third quarter. The net interest margin improved slightly during the fourth quarter, averaging 3.42 percent, up seven basis points from 3.35 percent in the third quarter. As we discussed on the earnings call in October, we held higher levels of cash on the balance sheet during the third quarter, and this continued in the fourth quarter. In this unusually low interest rate environment and with the prospects for improved asset yields in 2011 and beyond, we remain opportunistic investors. While this program negatively impacts the net interest margin, it is a temporary issue and it will allow for future margin expansion as the economy improves and loan growth returns, perhaps as early as late 2011. Offsetting this has been improved deposit mix, which allowed net interest deposit costs to decline 9 basis points to 0.92 percent and overall costs of deposits to decline 8 basis points to 0.76 percent compared to the third quarter.
As for the balance sheet, compared with the third quarter, residential real estate loans grew by an annualized 7.7 percent, reflecting specifically the retaining of more mortgage loan production in the portfolio, while consumer loan correction was largely offset by monthly amortization of principal. While it seems clear that economic activity continues to improve, commercial loan growth is still weak and dependent on market share increases, as little new business is being started, expanded or opened.
With that said, we continue to see strong growth in core deposits. Average core customer deposits, which exclude CDs greater than $100,000, increased in the fourth quarter to 84.5 percent of total deposits, up from 80.5 percent a year ago.
Turning to noninterest income excluding security gains, noninterest income was $5.3 million for the recent quarter compared to $4.8 million in the third quarter. Mortgage banking fees were $580,000 for the quarter, down from $654,000 linked-quarter. As I mentioned earlier, this decline can be attributed to our decision to retain a higher percentage of mortgage production, as closed production increased to $49 million in the quarter, up from $38 million in the third quarter and sequentially was up every quarter. We started with first quarter at $33 million.
Service charges on deposit accounts were $1.6 million during the quarter compared with $1.5 million linked-quarter. This 20.9 percent annualized increase reflected the full impact of the implementation of the new Reg E, which Denny mentioned and I mentioned earlier, but it was largely offset. There were declines in those fees, but they were principally offset with increases in personal and business core deposit household growth.
Turning to expenses, operating expenses continue to be well controlled during the recent quarter. Excluding credit-related costs and professional fees, as discussed earlier core operating expenses were $17.5 million, down from $17.7 million in the third quarter. Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of total loans were 147 basis points, down from 329 basis points linked-quarter. The provision for credit losses was also down at $4 million for the quarter compared to $9 million in the linked-quarter. The provision allowed for the allowance for loan losses to remain at a steady 3.04 percent of total loans at year-end.
The tangible common equity (TCE) ratio was 5.81 percent at the end of the fourth quarter, a 105 basis point increase from 4.76 percent at December 31, 2009. We increased the deferred tax valuation allowance again this quarter and it now totals $47.8 million. The recapture of the valuation allowance will allow the TCE to increase by 137 basis points when we are able to rely on a forecast of future taxable earnings as support for the Companys net deferred tax assets (DTA).
The outlook for 2011 is for the rate of recovery to remain slow with levels of economic activity improving. We expect the net interest margin for 2011 to be relatively consistent with the 3.42 percent we recorded in the fourth quarter. Overall, our goal for 2011 is to sustain the improvements that we have gained during 2010 and to further develop and implement strategies which achieve our long-term objective of improving shareholder value.
That concludes my remarks, so Ill turn the back to Denny and we will open for some questions.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Thank you, Bill. We included a new slide this quarter, nonperforming loan inflows, slide number six If you take a look at that, it is very supportive of some of the comments I made earlier in the call. Again, we are seeing a very significant reduction in the level of inflows. And the final comment Ill make is we were very comprehensive in our look at year-end nonperforming assets with respect to credit marks needed and so forth to move those assets out as we look forward into 2011. Youll probably have some questions on that and Im happy to give you a little more detail around that. But I think for now, we will just throw the floor open to questions and ask the operator to please announce our questions.
Operator:
Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. If you have a question, please press star, then one, on your touchtone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, please press the pound sign or the hash key. There will be a delay before the first question is announced. If youre using a speakerphone, you may need to pick up the handset first before pressing the numbers. Once again, if you have a question, please press star, then one, on your touchtone phone.
The first question is from Brad Scheiner from FBR Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Brad Scheiner:
Good morning, gentlemen.
William R. Hahl:
Good morning.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Good morning.
Brad Scheiner:
Good to see credit improving. I understand you will have about a 140 basis point TCE recapture when the DTA comes back. TCE, though, is still below 6 percent. Can you just give some color on how you are thinking about capital, whether you think you need to access the capital markets?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Well, I think our focus is on returning to profitability. And as we return to profitability, the visibility of the deferred tax asset gets a little clearer, and we think its important to do that. So were comfortable with our capital position right now. As I said, we were pretty aggressive in the fourth quarter, looking at all of the credit marks throughout the portfolio and getting the portfolio now to a point where we can start to more rapidly reduce and liquidate, in an appropriate way, those assets. So as we do that, we continue to improve credit quality, number one, and risk levels continue to improve, which we think is positive in terms of looking at capital. That is to say, the credit impact on capital will become much less in 2011, and we think we have bottomed out in terms of some of the capital numbers there. So we fully expect to see that number improve over the next year.
Brett Scheiner:
Let me ask you a follow-up on that. Your intention would be for the at least partial DTA recovery, if not all, as you return to profitabilitycertainly you have plenty of time to use itand then raise capital at a more favorable price? Or do you believe at that point that youll be capitalized at a comfortable rate?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
We believe well be capitalized at a comfortable rate. Given the improving risk profile of the organization, the growing revenues, and increasing profitability, we will start accreting capital in 2011.
Brett Scheiner:
Okay great. Congrats in the improvements in the year. Take care.
William R. Hahl:
Thanks.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Chris Marinac from FIG Partners. Please go ahead.
Chris Marinac:
Thanks. Good morning, Denny and Bill.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Good morning.
William R. Hahl:
Good morning, Chris.
Chris Marinac:
I wanted to ask about your perception about the classified assets relative to capital reserves at this juncture. Are you satisfied with the improvements there, and do you think that there will be further changes in that ratio coming lower in the coming quarters?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yeah, we are very pleased with the level of classified assets to capital. Its improved consistently for quite some time now. In fact, our classified assets peaked prior to the nonperforming loans peaking in the third quarter, so it would have been a couple of quarters earlier. And ever since then, we have seen a continuous decline in the level of classified assets. When you relate that number to our capital, again the trends are positive. We are seeing those numbers get even more favorable as we hit the end of 2011 in terms of our outlook and projection. So, yeah, we feel pretty comfortable with where we are there. The trends are great; the numbers are down to levels that we find a lot more acceptable than they were two years ago; and again the inflows and migration trends are very favorable as well. We are now seeingI think I said last quarterwe are starting to see more upgrades than we are downgrades, and that continued into the fourth quarter. So we are seeing things clearly stabilize, Chris, on that front. Back to the earlier question on capital, thats one reason we feel comfortable with the current capital position. We are seeing all the risk metrics improve very nicely.
Chris Marinac:
Denny, is there any rule of thumb on if we see NPAs and other performance metrics improve, is there any relationship to how classifieds drop? Do the classifieds actually fall faster than NPAs, or is there any rule of thumb there?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yeah, I dont know. I dont have that number off of the top of my head. But Id say as the NPAs come down, we do see some probably modest, even further improvement in the level of classifieds, and its because of performing classified loans, again, improving. The other thing I said last quarter was the quality of the classified loans that are not on nonaccrual, that is to say those that continue to perform, the quality of those classified assets continues to improve. We are seeing relationships that two years ago were headed....had trends that were very negative and now we are seeing the trends improve. Its still a classified asset; its still got stress; we are still concerned about it, but the falling trends have now stabilized in just about all cases, and in many cases have actually improved; and we can begin to start seeing the borrower is returning to better health. So there is some of that going on, and that would tend to increase the improvement beyond that that you are seeing in NPLs.
Chris Marinac:
Okay. And then just one quick last question, Denny. On OREO costs, how much change should we expect in that? I know this quarter was a large one, but just curious on how that number is going to fluctuate quarter-quarter?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yeah, this quarter was... Its a good question. This quarter was a very large impact. And again, as the inflows have now moderated and our projected inflows continue to moderate as we look forward, we felt this quarter we needed to look very carefully at current market conditions and try to achieve credit marks, particularly in the OREO portfolio, that would allow us to continue to liquidate those assets over the next several quarters. We feel pretty good about that. We think weve got things marked more aggressively now than they probably ever have been, and its the right time to do that.
Russ, did you have any comments on...
H. Russell Holland, III:
Well, just sort of confirming what you said that we have written the assets down to where we are seeing increased market activity, which has been reducing our days in ORE. So we have been able to start seeing more movement in the assets sooner.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Right. We are seeing good activity on the OREO side and things are moving, and actually probably a little ahead of where we had thought we would be in the fourth quarter on OREO. Again, with all of the migration that occurred in 2010 into OREO, its pretty amazing. We actually saw no growth from year-end to year-end in OREO balances. So we are feeling pretty good about our ability to move the stuff out, and we believe that will continue next quarter and into 2011. We are more optimistic today than we were last quarter, and we were very optimistic about the trends last quarter. So we are feeling pretty good now that things have really turned, clearly stabilized. Locally things are stabilizing, and we are seeing much better numbers out ahead of us.
Chris Marinac:
Great. Thanks very much for the color.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yep.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Dave Bishop from Stifel Nicolaus. Please go ahead.
Dave Bishop:
Hey. Good morning, guys.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Morning.
William R. Hahl:
Morning.
Dave Bishop:
Hey, circling back to the OREO costs there, in terms of the expenses this quarter, was it - how deep of a dive was it? Were there larger credits impacting that? Actually, what was moved out of there? What flowed in, in terms of the size and depth, or was it a little bit more granular in terms of some of the write-down?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Ill make a general comment and then turn it over to Russ and Jean to give a little more color. Generally speaking, again in my earlier comments several quarters back, we focused our liquidation efforts in late 2008 and all of 2009 on our largest, biggest, baddest, nastiest stuff. And as a result of that, the inflows that we are seeing now are much smaller in sizenow meaning during 2010tended to be more granular and things that are easier to liquidate. That was the plan back in late 2008, and we executed on that plan. Now we are seeing it come to fruition with these improvements in 2010. Those improvements will continue on into 2011 and the negative impacts are driven down by the increased granularity and the increased liquidity associated with it.
Any other comments, Russ or Jean, on that?
H. Russell Holland, III:
As far as the nature of the write-downs, they were fairly diverse across the portfolios and were again valuation-driven, enabling us to move the assets more quickly.
O. Jean Strickland:
We had a conscious thought... This is Jean Strickland. We had a conscious thought that we wanted to take a hard look so that we could make sure of our ability this year to continue moving things out.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yeah.
Dave Bishop:
Has there been any change in terms of the depth of the market there for secondary, for buyers there in terms of dipping their toe in the market? Is it becoming a little bit more rational, a bit more professional-driven, where people are getting not necessarily more optimistic, but a little bit more rational in terms of the pricing there? Its okay, its more acceptable in terms of the marks that you are taking?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
We are actually seeing improved volumes. First of all, for example, residential home sales accelerated back up in December and were actually surprisingly strong in the month of December. We are seeing pricing... The valuations now on the residential side of things are not what I would call bargains, because it is the market price, but they are very reasonably priced and they are pricedas Ive said for several quartersto match income levels. Everything has come back into balance, and that is what is driving the volume up in those areas. We are also seeing some stability, I would say, across the board and in commercial as well.
You were about to say something...
O. Jean Strickland:
Just that we commented earlier, I think you and Russ both did, about the activity that we are seeing. Were seeing a more active market, which speaks for a little bit more demand. So to your point about: Are the pricing expectations of sellers and buyers getting closer together, I would say, Yes, we are seeing that now.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yeah, and I think the price capitulation on the part of the seller, which was driven by a lot of short sales and distressed asset sales and that sort of thing, have really come into a better balance with the buyers expectations. So we are again seeing things move. We have a much more positive outlook today than we had a year ago.
Dave Bishop:
Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star/one on your phone.
The next question is from Mac Hodgson from SunTrust Robinson. Please go ahead.
Mac Hodgson:
Good morning.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Good morning.
Mac Hodgson:
On the margin, I know you mentioned that the excess cash liquidity of $200 million or so is a drag and that you hope to obviously redeploy it. Can you help us think through long-term where the margin could go when that turns around and loan growth comes back?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
As Bill pointed out, the higher level is not just cash. Its also higher levels of short-term investments in the portfolio that restricts our ability to produce a better margin. And as that liquidity in the short-term investment portfolio is reinvested into loans, we are projecting some very nice margin expansions over time. I think the key there is: what is the pace of that? We have been very disciplined with respect to our forward projections for interest rate risk, and we are very concerned over where yields may be going over the next year. So we have been, as I said, very disciplined in trying to manage that price risk very diligently, and we put more of our efforts into growing a loan portfolio. There are two things that happened that will layout over the next couple of years, Mac. The first thing will be the redeployment of liquidity into the loan portfolio, and that is worth a lot of money. That would have a significant impact on net interest income, and it would actually probably have a very significant impact on bottom line performance. We see that occurring over the next 12 to 18 months. And then beyond that, the continued growth in market share and household growth that we talked about this quarter and last quarter, particularly, starts expanding the balance sheet in a very low cost way. Again, that works its way back into earning assets, which is the secondary source of margin growth and will be more of an impact in 2012 and beyond. But all of those things are stacking up to improve margin growth. It might be good for somebody to comment on what effort we have underway to grow the loan portfolio.
H. Russell Holland, III:
Sure. On the commercial side, we have been heavily recruiting commercial lenders from our competitors in various markets, and we have seen some activity of bringing those relationships over from our competitors. We are focused on small business lending, owner-occupied type financing, and have seen an increase in the fourth quarter in the number of transactions. In residential mortgages, we have had a significant increase in volume bringing us back to improve our market share in our core markets and increase our volume in those areas. We are also working heavily with our retail branches in originating additional consumer credit.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Right. So we have a lot of irons in the fire, Mac, to grow that loan portfolio in an appropriate way. We have seen great success in the residential and a little bit in the consumer area. Thats working very well, and those are market share gains that are driving that success. We want to see similar market share gains driving success in the small business owner-occupied area, as Russ said, and that led us to recruiting. What we seeing out there with our recruiting effortsand this is fairly recent, something we started last quarter and talked aboutwe actually landed some folks in the fourth quarter who are beginning to produce. But the real impact starts to get felt in 2011 with growing revenues out of that. But I know...
H. Russell Holland, III:
Well the interesting thing in our market is there is still quite a bit of disruption with some of our larger competitors that are in transition, and that transition is causing disruption not only with their customers, but also with their line production folks. We are able to attract them because what Seacoast has to offer is fairly unique in our market, and it is attracting not only the customers, but the originators as well.
Mac Hodgson:
How many bankers did you hire?
H. Russell Holland, III:
We brought on four in the fourth quarter, and we are going to continue that trend throughout 2011.
Mac Hodgson:
Okay, thats great color. Thanks. Just a couple others...
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
And by the way, I just remind you, in the second quarter call in July, I talked about we had moved all of our softer workouts back into special assets, so what was frenetic in the prior year 2009 has now clearly turned into, I think I called it, a mop up operation by the time we hit mid-year. So the focus was in the second half of the year to really press forward to drive revenue growth so that we could set ourselves up for some more impressive revenue growth in 2011 and beyond. A lot of our existing production folks are now devoting greater amounts of their time, in fact full-time now, on new loan growth. We think that the timing was good, because the economy is stabilizing and the local economy is starting to repair itself now. Unemployment is still very, very high in our marketsin most of our markets, its 12 and 13 percent or even a couple of them almost 14 percentso conditions are still very, very soft. But we think the timing is very appropriate for us to be back out in the market now. What we have to focus on is...We are not seeing any new production, new business, new expansion going on; it is all market share acquisition, so we are lasering in on particular market segments that are very attractive in the current environment and are likely to show improved performance over the next couple of years. We are lasering in on those areas, and we are seeking production folks in other markets from other competitors who have a specialty in those targeted segments; and its beginning to work. We saw volume increase very nicely in the commercial side in the fourth quarter, and pipelines are starting to build. We did this a year ago on the residential side, and it is now paying dividends big time. We believe by the time we get to the end of 2011, we will have some very nice overall loan growth beginning to materialize and that will drive net interest income throughout 2011, but even more aggressively in 2012.
Mac Hodgson:
Okay great. Just maybe just one last one. What is the liquidity at the holding company and when do you expect to go back to, unless I missed it already, go back to paying the TARP interest or preferred dividends?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Yeah, thats kind of a current topic. We have over $20 million of liquidity at the parent, and we believe we are very fast approaching a point when it makes sense for us to come out of deferral. So it is a current topic; and as we get better visibility on that, we will be letting you know what our thoughts are.
Mac Hodgson:
Okay great. Thanks.
Operator:
Thank you. The next question is from Bill Young from Macquarie. Please go ahead.
Bill Young:
Hey, good morning, guys.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Good morning.
William R. Hahl:
Good morning.
Bill Young:
Could you just quickly remind us how much you expect to achieve from cost savings with the efficiency plan next year?
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
We dont have anything that weve announced in terms of what that looks like, but well have something to say I think in the first quarter.
You had a comment?
O. Jean Strickland:
Only that we are looking at working with an outside firm to assist with an overhead review, so it will be significant.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
It will be a significant deep look, and we are looking for operating efficiencies. We have been through a very tumultuous period, and as we begin to now stabilize the organization and see these trends emerge, I think its very important and very timely for us to refocus our attention on our structural overhead, match that overhead to the opportunities out ahead of us, and begin to increase our efficiencies as we look forward. Our efficiency ratio today is completely unacceptable. It is not where it needs to be, but that is not entirely due to the operational side and the cost side. It is also very, very much a function of the revenue side of the equation given what we have been through here. Id remind you that not only are we holding very high levels of liquidity, but we are also continuing to carry higher levels of nonperforming assets; and as those assets are liquidated and reinvested, all of that continues to drive revenue up. So we think the combination of a look at overhead, combined with this focus on revenue, will begin to get our overhead ratios back, in a year from now, to a level that we find a lot more acceptable.
O. Jean Strickland:
And part of focusing on efficiency has to do with improving customer service, so thats another benefit that we expect to achieve through the look we will do this year.
Mac Hodgson:
Got it. Thanks, guys.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Dave Bishop from Stifel Nicolaus is back online with a question. Please go ahead.
Dave Bishop:
Yeah, I just had one follow-up. Jean, I think you talked about this before, and it doesnt look like there was too much movement in or out either way, but on the restructured loan portfolios, have you had much experience there I think you were assuming it was like 20 percent on the residential side and no re-defaults on the commercial real estate side? Is that still holding true?
O. Jean Strickland:
That is still holding true. We have no re-defaults on the commercial side. And on the residential side, we are experiencing half of what the industry sees in terms of us having a 20 percent re-default rate versus 40.
Dave Bishop:
Okay, gotcha. Great. Thank you.
Operator:
Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star/one on your phone. At this time, there are no further questions.
Dennis S. Hudson, III:
Okay. Well thank you very much for your attendance today. We look forward to talking with you after the first quarter results. Thank you.
Operator:
Thank you. Ladies and gentleman, this concludes todays conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
EXHIBIT 99.3
To Form 8-K dated January 26, 2011
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
Fourth Quarter 2010
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements about future financial and operating results, ability to realized deferred tax assets, cost savings, enhanced revenues, economic and seasonal conditions in our markets, and improvements to reported earnings that may be realized from cost controls and for integration of banks that we have acquired, as well as statements with respect to Seacoasts objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Seacoast to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You should not expect us to update any forward-looking statements.
You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as may, will, anticipate, assume, should, support, indicate, would, believe, contemplate, expect, estimate, continue, further, point to, project, could, intend or other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the effects of future economic and market conditions, including seasonality; governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative, tax and regulatory changes; changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, liquidity and the values of loan collateral, securities, and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; interest rate risks, sensitivities and the shape of the yield curve; the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market areas and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet; and the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses. The risks of mergers and acquisitions, include, without limitation: unexpected transaction costs, including the costs of integrating operations; the risks that the businesses will not be integrated successfully or that such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; the potential failure to fully or timely realize expected revenues and revenue synergies, including as the result of revenues following the merger being lower than expected; the risk of deposit and customer attrition; any changes in deposit mix; unexpected operating and other costs, which may differ or change from expectations; the risks of customer and employee loss and business disruption, including, without limitation, as the result of difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees; increased competitive pressures and solicitations of customers by competitors; as well as the difficulties and risks inherent with entering new markets.
All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors, and otherwise in our SEC reports and filings. Such reports are available upon request from the Company, or from the Securities and Exchange Commission, including through the SECs Internet website at http://www.sec.gov .
1
Highlights
| | Loss of $11.1 million, or $0.12 per share, improved significantly compared to last year |
| | Solid capital position with estimated tangible common equity (TCE) ratio of 8.0% when DTA valuation allowance of $47.8 million is recaptured. |
| | Nonperforming loans declined from $69.5 million at September 30, 2010 to $68.2 million during the quarter |
| | The trend of decline in accruing loans outstanding continues to slow |
| | Liquidity remains strong with low cost core funding from deposits and sweep repos |
| | Cost of deposits for the quarter declined 8 basis points to 0.76%; total interest bearing liabilities down 8 basis points to 1.01% |
| | Improved asset quality trends continued with nonperforming assets, nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs all declining |
| | Favorable deposit volume and mix trends continued |
| | Expenses remain well managed |
| | Operating trends continue to be encouraging and we remain acutely focused on executing client satisfaction and retention initiatives to drive steadily improving results |
Capital Ratios
| 4Q-2010 | 3Q-2010 | 2Q-2010 | 1Q-2010 | |||||||||||||
| Estimate | Actual | Actual | Actual | |||||||||||||
|
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
|
16.57 | % | 17.11 | % | 17.62 | % | 13.83 | % | ||||||||
|
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio
|
17.84 | % | 18.38 | % | 18.89 | % | 15.29 | % | ||||||||
|
YTD Average Equity to YTD Average
Assets
|
8.27 | % | 8.15 | % | 7.82 | % | 7.13 | % | ||||||||
|
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets
|
8.10 | % | 8.76 | % | 8.78 | % | 6.96 | % | ||||||||
|
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible
Assets
|
5.81 | % | 6.48 | % | 6.60 | % | 4.82 | % | ||||||||
|
Tangible Common Equity to Risk
Weighted Assets
|
9.43 | % | 10.32 | % | 10.78 | % | 7.53 | % | ||||||||
Credit Analysis
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4Q-2010 | 3Q-2010 | 2Q-2010 | 1Q-2010 | 4Q-2009 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs
|
$ | 4,678 | $ | 10,700 | $ | 20,209 | $ | 3,541 | $ | 45,172 | ||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs to average
loans
|
1.47 | % | 3.29 | % | 5.95 | % | 1.03 | % | 12.12 | % | ||||||||||
|
Loan loss provision
|
$ | 3,975 | $ | 8,866 | $ | 16,771 | $ | 2,068 | $ | 41,514 | ||||||||||
|
Allowance to loans at end
of period
|
3.04 | % | 3.04 | % | 3.10 | % | 3.18 | % | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||
NPL Inflows
| 1Q-09 | 2Q-09 | 3Q-09 | 4Q-09 | 1Q-10 | 2Q-10 | 3Q-10 | 4Q-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NPL Inflows
|
$ | 37,170 | $ | 46,303 | $ | 75,295 | $ | 36,196 | $ | 11,895 | $ | 22,560 | $ | 8,151 | $ | 9,990 | ||||||||||||||||
Funding & Liquidity
Stable Funding Profile and Strong Liquidity Position
Funding
| | Deposits and sweep repo base |
- Customer deposits and sweep repos were $1.734 billion at December 31, 2010 (1)
- Customer deposits and sweep repos compose 94% of total funding (2)
Liquidity
| | Daily overnight borrowing position maintained at zero since year-end 2008 |
| | On balance sheet cash liquidity averaged approximately $174 billion for the fourth quarter |
| | Combined available contingent liquidity from the Federal Reserve, FHLB, and free securities approximately $638 million |
| (1) | Excludes brokered deposits; but includes Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) deposits |
| (2) | Total funding includes customer deposits, broker deposits, sweep repos, borrowed funds and subordinated debt. |
2
Noninterest Expense
Controllable Expenses Well Managed
($ in thousands)
4Q2010
3Q2010
4Q2009
$
27,834
$
20,244
$
20,868
179
791
902
1,414
942
488
8,763
849
2,125
$
10,356
$
2,582
$
3,515
$
17,478
$
17,662
$
17,353
4Q 2010
4Q 2010
vs 3Q 2010
vs 4Q 2009
37.5
%
33.4
%
301.1
%
194.6
%
-1.0
%
0.7
%
| (1) | Does not include personnel expense related to credit administration or default management costs |
3
Core Deposit Growth
Net Interest Margin
Noninterest Income (excluding securities gains)
Service Area
[Map of Franchise]
4
Favorable Mix Shift
($ in thousands)
4Q-2010
Mix
4Q-2009
Mix
$
289,621
17.69
%
$
268,789
15.11
%
812,625
49.63
%
838,288
47.11
%
$
1,102,246
67.31
%
$
1,107,077
62.22
%
281,681
17.20
%
326,070
18.32
%
7,093
0.43
%
38,656
2.17
%
246,208
15.04
%
307,631
17.29
%
$
534,982
32.68
%
$
672,357
37.78
%
$
1,637,228
$
1,779,434
4Q-09
1Q-10
2Q-10
3Q-10
4Q-10
3.37
%
3.48
%
3.27
%
3.35
%
3.42
%
Focus on deposit pricing and favorable deposit trends benefited the margin
Margin is expected to remain stable provided the slower pace of decline in accruing
loans outstanding continues in the following year
Quarterly Trends Improve Sequentially in 2010
2010
Q-4
Q-3
Q-2
Q-1
$
5,283
$
4,801
$
4,601
$
4,559
$
1,509
$
1,511
$
1,452
$
1,372
510
500
491
476
580
654
464
421
325
306
257
286
355
330
310
339
814
810
822
717
Seminole County
Orange County
Brevard County
Indian River County
Okeechobee County
St. Lucie County
Martin County
Palm Beach County
Hardee County
Highlands County
Desoto County
Glades County
Hendry County