Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table

PAY VERSUS

PERFORMANCE

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation

S-K

(Rule), we are providing the following information about the relationship between what the SEC defines as “compensation actually paid”(CAP) and certain aspects of the Company’s financial performance. The OECC did not consider the Pay Versus Performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown. This information shall not be deemed to be incorporated into any other filing with the SEC.

The following table discloses information on CAP to our principal executive officer (PEO), who is our CEO, and to the remainder of the NEOs during the specified years alongside TSR and net income metrics as well as EPS. Net income is a relevant measure as it comprises approximately 50% of the formula for the EAIP. The Company selected EPS as important in linking NEOs’ CAP to Company performance, because EPS is the predominant metric used in our performance share awards under our LTIP and because it aligns executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests and drives a focus on earnings as further described on page 50.

The table below and the discussion that follows includes CAP calculated in accordance with the Rule, which requires, among other things, the revaluation of unvested and outstanding equity awards, in the following ways, as applicable:

•

The

year-end

fair value of the equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year;

•

The change in fair value from the end of the prior year to the end of the applicable year with respect to any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable fiscal year;

•

The fair value, as of the vesting date, of any awards that were granted and vested in the same year; and

•

The change in fair value from the end of the prior year to the vesting date or forfeiture date with respect to any awards granted in prior years that vested or failed to vest, as applicable, in the applicable year.

Stock awards include the dollar amount of accrued dividend equivalents. In addition, the Rule requires the subtraction of the aggregate change in actuarial present value of pension and the addition of pension service costs for services rendered for each relevant year.

The amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table are largely based on the grant date fair value of equity compensation awards made during the applicable fiscal year, whereas CAP is based on the fair value of equity awards made during the year valued at

year-end,

plus any change in the value of prior year’s awards, including awards granted in the prior four years, whether or not the NEO will ever actually receive that award. Thus, CAP for each year reflects all or portions of multiple years’ worth of equity awards, whereas the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table are based only on the equity awards granted in the applicable reporting year.

Importantly, as of the valuation dates in the table, none of the amounts included in CAP relating to unvested shares have been paid to our CEO or other NEOs. The amounts actually received will depend upon the Company’s performance and the Company’s stock price, including at the time the common stock underlying the equity awards is actually delivered.

CAP Calculated in Accordance with the

Rule


Year	Summary Compensation Table for Anderson PEO (1)		CAP to Anderson PEO (2)		Summary Compensation Table for Palfreyman PEO (1)		CAP to Palfreyman PEO (2)		Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (3)		Average CAP to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (4)		Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on (5)				Net Income (7)		EPS (8)
Year	Summary Compensation Table for Anderson PEO (1)		CAP to Anderson PEO (2)		Summary Compensation Table for Palfreyman PEO (1)		CAP to Palfreyman PEO (2)				Average CAP to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (4)		Company TSR		Peer Group TSR (6)		Net Income (7)		EPS (8)
(a)	(b)		(c)		(b)		(c)		(d)		(e)		(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)

2025		$575,775		$1,146,637		$3,695,467		$3,610,999		$1,557,143		$1,733,342		$126.55		$142.65		$113,319,000		$2.77

2024		4,137,585		3,721,091		—		—		1,320,446		1,325,377		102.25		122.91		78,871,000		2.03

2023		3,537,654		2,579,106		—		—		1,139,993		890,769		95.72		111.49		93,868,000		2.59

2022		3,641,640		3,295,181		—		—		1,153,599		1,202,476		111.89		117.52		86,303,000		2.54

2021		3,759,354		3,369,633		—		—		1,133,392		1,196,854		110.31		117.09		78,666,000		2.56

(1)

Amounts in columns (b) represent the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for

Mr. Anderson

, who was the CEO and our PEO for all of 2021 through 2024 and a portion of 2025, as well as the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2025 for

Mr. Palfreyman

, who was the CEO and our PEO for a portion of 2025.

(2)

Amounts in columns (c) represent CAP as computed in accordance with the Rule for the CEO(s). The dollar amounts do no

t refl

ect the actual amounts of compensation earned by or paid to the CEO(s) during the applicable year. To calculate CAP in accordance with the Rule, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table as described in the text preceding the table. A reconciliation of the adjustments is set forth in a table following these footnotes.

(3)

Amounts reported in column (d)

represent

the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the NEOs other than the CEO(s). For 2025, the NEOs other than the CEO(s) include Raymond J. Kaszuba III, MardiLyn Saathoff, Kimberly Rush, and Megan Berge. For 2024, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Raymond J. Kaszuba III, Brody J. Wilson, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. For 2023, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Frank Burkhartsmeyer, Brody J. Wilson, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. For years prior to 2023, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Frank Burkhartsmeyer, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush.

(4)

Amounts in column (e) represent CAP as computed in accordance with the Rule for the average of the NEOs other than the CEO(s). The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amounts of compensation earned by or paid to the other NEOs during the applicable year. To calculate CAP in accordance with the Rule, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table as described in the text preceding the table. A reconciliation of the adjustments is set forth in a table following these footnotes.

(5)	Pursuant to the Rule, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2020 in the Company’s common stock.

(6)

In accordance with the Rule, Peer Group TSR is determined using the same peer group identified in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, weighted according to the respective peers’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. This peer group was consistent throughout the five-year period displayed, except that Clearway Energy, Inc. was added in 2024, and South Jersey Industries, Inc. was part of the peer group until it was

acquired

in 2023. Each adjustment to the peer group was made to provide a better comparator group to the Company.

(7)	Net income in accordance with GAAP.

(8)	EPS in accordance with GAAP.

Reconciliation of CAP

Adjustments


Year	Summary Compensation Table Total		(Minus) Change in Accumulated Benefits Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans		Plus Service Costs Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans		(Minus) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year		Plus Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year		(Minus)/ Plus Change in Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years		Plus Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year		Plus/ (Minus) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions were Satisfied During Fiscal Year		(Minus) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year		Equals Compensation Actually Paid

PEO ( Palfreyman )

2025		$3,695,467		$—		$—		$(1,726,208)		$1,400,517		$143,377		$—		$97,846		$—		$3,610,999

PEO (Anderson)

2025		$575,775		$—		$20,211		$—		$—		$331,486		$—		$377,735		$(158,570)		$1,146,637

2024		4,137,585		(572,759)		20,841		(1,629,976)		1,656,971		21,990		—		86,439		—		3,721,091

2023		3,537,654		(398,487)		20,015		(1,449,015)		1,179,999		(294,636)		—		(16,424)		—		2,579,106

2022		3,641,640		(481,596)		19,931		(1,450,637)		1,437,741		(36,880)		—		164,982		—		3,295,181

2021		3,759,354		(667,306)		19,988		(1,360,798)		1,409,352		55,819		—		153,224		—		3,369,633

Other NEOs (Average)

2025		$1,557,143		$121,113		$22,550		$(540,372)		$459,816		$56,288		$—		$56,804		$—		$1,733,342

2024		1,320,446		(36,293)		17,717		(450,767)		455,296		4,107		—		14,871		—		1,325,377

2023		1,139,993		(68,223)		14,116		(372,021)		302,953		(72,345)		—		4,113		(57,817)		890,769

2022		1,153,599		—		21,281		(412,749)		409,084		(10,518)		—		41,779		—		1,202,476

2021		1,133,392		(35,483)		21,162		(392,592)		406,594		15,053		—		48,728		—		1,196,854

Company Selected Measure Name

EPS

Named Executive Officers, Footnote

(3)

Amounts reported in column (d)

represent

Peer Group Issuers, Footnote

(6)

acquired

in 2023. Each adjustment to the peer group was made to provide a better comparator group to the Company.

Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote


Year	Summary Compensation Table Total		(Minus) Change in Accumulated Benefits Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans		Plus Service Costs Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans		(Minus) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year		Plus Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year		(Minus)/ Plus Change in Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years		Plus Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year		Plus/ (Minus) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions were Satisfied During Fiscal Year		(Minus) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year		Equals Compensation Actually Paid

PEO ( Palfreyman )

2025		$3,695,467		$—		$—		$(1,726,208)		$1,400,517		$143,377		$—		$97,846		$—		$3,610,999

PEO (Anderson)

2025		$575,775		$—		$20,211		$—		$—		$331,486		$—		$377,735		$(158,570)		$1,146,637

2024		4,137,585		(572,759)		20,841		(1,629,976)		1,656,971		21,990		—		86,439		—		3,721,091

2023		3,537,654		(398,487)		20,015		(1,449,015)		1,179,999		(294,636)		—		(16,424)		—		2,579,106

2022		3,641,640		(481,596)		19,931		(1,450,637)		1,437,741		(36,880)		—		164,982		—		3,295,181

2021		3,759,354		(667,306)		19,988		(1,360,798)		1,409,352		55,819		—		153,224		—		3,369,633

Other NEOs (Average)

2025		$1,557,143		$121,113		$22,550		$(540,372)		$459,816		$56,288		$—		$56,804		$—		$1,733,342

2024		1,320,446		(36,293)		17,717		(450,767)		455,296		4,107		—		14,871		—		1,325,377

2023		1,139,993		(68,223)		14,116		(372,021)		302,953		(72,345)		—		4,113		(57,817)		890,769

2022		1,153,599		—		21,281		(412,749)		409,084		(10,518)		—		41,779		—		1,202,476

2021		1,133,392		(35,483)		21,162		(392,592)		406,594		15,053		—		48,728		—		1,196,854

Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount

$ 1,557,143

$ 1,320,446

$ 1,139,993

$ 1,153,599

$ 1,133,392

Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount

$ 1,733,342

1,325,377

890,769

1,202,476

1,196,854

Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote


Year	Summary Compensation Table Total		(Minus) Change in Accumulated Benefits Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans		Plus Service Costs Under Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans		(Minus) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year		Plus Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year		(Minus)/ Plus Change in Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years		Plus Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year		Plus/ (Minus) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years for which Applicable Vesting Conditions were Satisfied During Fiscal Year		(Minus) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year		Equals Compensation Actually Paid

PEO ( Palfreyman )

2025		$3,695,467		$—		$—		$(1,726,208)		$1,400,517		$143,377		$—		$97,846		$—		$3,610,999

PEO (Anderson)

2025		$575,775		$—		$20,211		$—		$—		$331,486		$—		$377,735		$(158,570)		$1,146,637

2024		4,137,585		(572,759)		20,841		(1,629,976)		1,656,971		21,990		—		86,439		—		3,721,091

2023		3,537,654		(398,487)		20,015		(1,449,015)		1,179,999		(294,636)		—		(16,424)		—		2,579,106

2022		3,641,640		(481,596)		19,931		(1,450,637)		1,437,741		(36,880)		—		164,982		—		3,295,181

2021		3,759,354		(667,306)		19,988		(1,360,798)		1,409,352		55,819		—		153,224		—		3,369,633

Other NEOs (Average)

2025		$1,557,143		$121,113		$22,550		$(540,372)		$459,816		$56,288		$—		$56,804		$—		$1,733,342

2024		1,320,446		(36,293)		17,717		(450,767)		455,296		4,107		—		14,871		—		1,325,377

2023		1,139,993		(68,223)		14,116		(372,021)		302,953		(72,345)		—		4,113		(57,817)		890,769

2022		1,153,599		—		21,281		(412,749)		409,084		(10,518)		—		41,779		—		1,202,476

2021		1,133,392		(35,483)		21,162		(392,592)		406,594		15,053		—		48,728		—		1,196,854

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return

CAP Versus TSR

Of the measures displayed in the above table, TSR has the most direct and sig

nific

ant impact on CEO and other NEO CAP

calculations

. This is primarily driven by our compensation program design, which is structured with a significant portion of compensation, and 100% incentive equity awards,

at-risk.

Approximately 51% of CEO compensation and approximately 39% of the average of other NEO compensation granted annually is composed of RSUs and performance share awards, and therefore is directly impacted by TSR. Additionally, the Rule requires that for each year that CAP is presented, outstanding but unvested equity awards are effectively

re-calculated

using the stock price as of the end of the applicable year. While similar values of RSUs and performance share awards were granted across the five years displayed, macroeconomic trends and stock price variations may result in wider variation in TSR and CAP calculations shown in the table below. The CAP table above and charts below do not display the 25% reduction in performance share awards paid due to lower than targeted relative TSR results in each of 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 for the years preceding vesting.

The graph below shows the relationship between (1) CAP to our CEOs and the average of the CAP to our other NEOs, and (2) our cumulative TSR and peer group cumulative TSR, over the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2025. The stock performance shown in the graph is not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income

CAP Versus Net Income

The Rule requires that net income be presented as a performance measure in the CAP table above. In addition, net income comprises approximately 50% of the formula for the EAIP. The graph below shows the relationship between CAP to our CEOs and the average of the CAP to our other NEOs and the Company’s net income over the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2025, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure

Earnings

Per

EPS is the Company-selected measure because three-year cumulative EPS is the predominant metric used in our performance share awards under our LTIP and because it aligns executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests and drives a focus on earnings. The Rules do not appear to permit a multi-year financial measure such as three-year cumulative EPS, so EPS was selected as the most closely aligned measure. The graph below shows the relationship between CAP paid to our CEOs and the average of our other NEOs and our EPS for each of the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2025.

Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group

CAP Versus TSR

Of the measures displayed in the above table, TSR has the most direct and sig

nific

ant impact on CEO and other NEO CAP

calculations

. This is primarily driven by our compensation program design, which is structured with a significant portion of compensation, and 100% incentive equity awards,

at-risk.

re-calculated

Tabular List, Table

Performance Measures

The seven performance measures listed below represent the most important measures the Company used to determine NEO compensation for fiscal year 2025. These measures and other identified considerations are further described in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” above.

Financial performance measures selected:



• Net Income		• Return on Invested Capital

• Earnings Per Share		• Return on Equity

• 3-Year Cumulative EPS		• 3-Year Relative TSR

• Total Shareholder Return

Total Shareholder Return Amount

$ 126.55

102.25

95.72

111.89

110.31

Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount

142.65

122.91

111.49

117.52

117.09

Net Income (Loss)

$ 113,319,000

$ 78,871,000

$ 93,868,000

$ 86,303,000

$ 78,666,000

Company Selected Measure Amount

2.77

2.03

2.59

2.54

2.56

Measure:: 1

Net Income

Measure:: 2

Earnings Per Share

Measure:: 3

3-Year Cumulative EPS

Measure:: 4

Total Shareholder Return

Measure:: 5

Return on Invested Capital

Measure:: 6

Return on Equity

Measure:: 7

3-Year Relative TSR

Mr.Anderson [Member]

PEO Total Compensation Amount

$ 575,775

$ 4,137,585

$ 3,537,654

$ 3,641,640

$ 3,759,354

PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount

$ 1,146,637

$ 3,721,091

$ 2,579,106

$ 3,295,181

$ 3,369,633

PEO Name

Mr. Anderson

Mr.Palfreyman [Member]

PEO Total Compensation Amount

$ 3,695,467

$ 0

PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount

$ 3,610,999

PEO Name

Mr. Palfreyman

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Pension Adjustments Prior Service Cost

$ 0

(572,759)

(398,487)

(481,596)

(667,306)

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested

20,211

20,841

20,015

19,931

19,988

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested

(1,629,976)

(1,449,015)

(1,450,637)

(1,360,798)

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year

1,656,971

1,179,999

1,437,741

1,409,352

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year

331,486

21,990

(294,636)

(36,880)

55,819

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year

PEO | Mr.Anderson [Member] | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year

377,735

86,439

(16,424)

164,982

153,224

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table

(158,570)

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Pension Adjustments Prior Service Cost

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested

(1,726,208)

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year

1,400,517

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year

143,377

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year

PEO | Mr.Palfreyman [Member] | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year

97,846

Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table

Non-PEO NEO | Pension Adjustments Prior Service Cost

121,113

(36,293)

(68,223)

(35,483)

Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested

22,550

17,717

14,116

21,281

21,162

Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested

(540,372)

(450,767)

(372,021)

(412,749)

(392,592)

Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year

459,816

455,296

302,953

409,084

406,594

Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year

56,288

4,107

(72,345)

(10,518)

15,053

Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year

Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year

56,804

14,871

4,113

41,779

48,728