NORTHWEST NATURAL HOLDING CO, DEF 14A filed on 4/10/2025
Proxy Statement (definitive)
v3.25.1
Cover
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Document Information [Line Items]  
Document Type DEF 14A
Amendment Flag false
Entity Information [Line Items]  
Entity Registrant Name NORTHWEST NATURAL HOLDING COMPANY
Entity Central Index Key 0001733998
v3.25.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K
(Rule), we are providing the following information about the relationship between what the SEC defines as “compensation actually paid” (CAP) and certain aspects of the Company’s financial performance. The OECC did not consider the Pay Versus Performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown. This information shall not be deemed to be incorporated into any other filing with the SEC.
The following table discloses information on CAP to our principal executive officer (PEO), who is our CEO, and to the remainder of the NEOs during the specified years alongside TSR and net income metrics as well as EPS. Net income is a relevant measure as it comprises approximately 50% of the formula for the EAIP. The Company selected EPS as important in linking NEOs’ CAP to Company performance, because EPS is the predominant metric used in our performance share awards under our LTIP and because it aligns executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests and drives a focus on earnings as further described on page 57.
The table below and the discussion that follows includes CAP calculated in accordance with the Rule, which requires, among other things, the revaluation of unvested and outstanding equity awards, in the following ways, as applicable:
 
   
the
year-end
fair value of the equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year;
   
the change in fair value from the end of the prior year to the end of the applicable year with respect to any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable fiscal year;
   
the fair value, as of the vesting date, of any awards that were granted and vested in the same year; and
   
the change in fair value from the end of the prior year to the vesting date or forfeiture date with respect to any awards granted in prior years that vested or failed to vest, as applicable, in the applicable year.
Stock awards include the dollar amount of accrued dividend equivalents. In addition, the Rule requires the subtraction of the aggregate change in actuarial present value of pension and the addition of pension service costs for services rendered for each relevant year.
The amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table are largely based on the grant date fair value of equity compensation awards made during the applicable fiscal year, whereas CAP is based on the fair value of equity awards made during the year valued at
year-end,
plus any change in the value of prior year’s awards, including awards granted in the prior four years, whether or not the NEO will ever actually receive that award. Thus, CAP for each year reflects all or portions of four years’ worth of equity awards, whereas the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table are based only on the equity awards granted in the applicable reporting year.
Importantly, as of the valuation dates in the table, none of the amounts included in CAP relating to unvested shares have been paid to our CEO or other NEOs. The amounts actually received will depend upon the Company’s performance and the Company’s stock price, including at the time the common stock underlying the equity awards is actually delivered.
 
CAP Calculated in Accordance with the Rule
 
Year
  
Summary
Compensation
Table for
PEO
1
  
CAP to PEO
2
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO

Named
Executive
Officers
3
  
Average CAP
to
Non-PEO

Named
Executive
Officers
2
  
 
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on
4
  
Net Income
6
  
EPS
7
  
Company TSR
  
Peer Group
TSR
5
(a)
  
(b)
  
(c)
  
(d)
  
(e)
  
(f)
  
(g)
  
(h)
  
(i)
2024
     $ 4,137,585      $ 3,721,091      $ 1,320,446        $1,325,377        $65.93      $ 106.50      $ 78,871,000      $ 2.03
2023
       3,537,654        2,579,106        1,139,993        890,769        61.72        96.61        93,868,000        2.59
2022
       3,641,640        3,295,181        1,153,599        1,202,476        72.15        101.83        86,303,000        2.54
2021
       3,759,354        3,369,633        1,133,392        1,196,854        71.13        101.46        78,666,000        2.56
2020
       3,824,428        1,386,395        1,110,184        579,240        64.48        86.65        76,781,000        2.51
 
(1)
Amounts in column (b) represent the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the CEO who is our PEO.
(2)
Amounts in columns (c) and (e) represent CAP as computed in accordance with the Rule for the CEO and the average of the NEOs other than the CEO, respectively. For 2024, the NEOs other than the CEO include Justin B. Palfreyman, Raymond J. Kaszuba III, Brody J. Wilson, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. For 2023, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Frank Burkhartsmeyer, Brody J. Wilson, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. For years prior to 2023, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Frank Burkhartsmeyer, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amounts of compensation earned by or paid to the CEO or other NEOs during the applicable year. To calculate CAP in accordance with the Rule, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table as described in the text preceding the table. A reconciliation of the adjustments is set forth in a table following these footnotes.
(3)
Amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the NEOs other than the CEO.
(4)
Pursuant to the Rule, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2019 in the Company’s common stock.
(5)
In accordance with the Rule, Peer Group TSR is determined using the same peer group used in the CD&A and identified in
Exhibit A
, weighted according to the respective peers’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. This peer group was consistent throughout the five-year period displayed, except that Clearway Energy, Inc. was added in 2024, and South Jersey Industries, Inc. was part of the peer group until it was acquired in 2023. El Paso Electric was also part of the peer group in 2020, until they were acquired in July 2020. Each adjustment to the peer group was made to provide a better comparator group to the Company.
(6)
 
Net income in accordance with GAAP.
(7)
 
EPS in accordance with GAAP.
 
Reconciliation of CAP Adjustments
 
Year
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
   
(Minus)

Change in
Accumulated
Benefits
Under
Defined
Benefit and
Actuarial
Pension
Plans
   
Plus

Service
Costs
Under
Defined
Benefit
and
Actuarial
Pension
Plans
    
(Minus)

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
Granted in
Fiscal Year
   
Plus

Fair Value
at Fiscal
Year-End
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Granted in
Fiscal Year
    
(Minus)/
Plus

Fair Value
at Fiscal
Year-End
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Granted in
Prior Fiscal
Years
   
Plus

Fair
Value at
Vesting
of Stock
Awards
Granted
in Fiscal
Year
that
Vested
During
Fiscal
Year
    
Plus/
(Minus)

Change in
Fair Value
as of
Vesting
Date of
Stock
Awards
Granted
in Prior
Years for
which
Applicable
Vesting
Conditions
were
Satisfied
During
Fiscal
Year
   
(Minus)

Fair Value
as of Prior
Fiscal
Year-End

of Stock
Awards
Granted
in Prior
Fiscal
Years that
Failed to
Meet
Applicable
Vesting
Conditions
During
Fiscal
Year
   
Equals

Compensation
Actually Paid
 
                           PEO
 
2024
    $4,137,585       $(572,759     $20,841      $ (1,629,976     $1,656,971        $21,990       $—        $86,439       $—       $3,721,091  
2023
    3,537,654       (398,487     20,015        (1,449,015     1,179,999        (294,636            (16,424           2,579,106  
2022
    3,641,640       (481,596     19,931        (1,450,637     1,437,741        (36,880            164,982             3,295,181  
2021
    3,759,354       (667,306     19,988        (1,360,798     1,409,352        55,819              153,224             3,369,633  
2020
    3,824,428       (1,039,036     19,016        (1,211,009     756,352        (620,683            (342,673           1,386,395  
                           Other NEOs (Average)
 
2024
    $1,320,446       $(36,293     $17,717        $(450,767     $455,296        $4,107       $—        $14,871       $—       $1,325,377  
2023
    1,139,993       (68,223     14,116        (372,021     302,953        (72,345            4,113       (57,817     890,769  
2022
    1,153,599             21,281        (412,749     409,084        (10,518            41,779             1,202,476  
2021
    1,133,392       (35,483     21,162        (392,592     406,594        15,053              48,728             1,196,854  
2020
    1,110,184       (150,977     17,045        (334,305     208,795        (183,708            (87,794           579,240  
       
Company Selected Measure Name EPS        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote
(2)
Amounts in columns (c) and (e) represent CAP as computed in accordance with the Rule for the CEO and the average of the NEOs other than the CEO, respectively. For 2024, the NEOs other than the CEO include Justin B. Palfreyman, Raymond J. Kaszuba III, Brody J. Wilson, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. For 2023, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Frank Burkhartsmeyer, Brody J. Wilson, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. For years prior to 2023, the NEOs other than the CEO included Justin B. Palfreyman, Frank Burkhartsmeyer, MardiLyn Saathoff, and Kimberly Rush. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amounts of compensation earned by or paid to the CEO or other NEOs during the applicable year. To calculate CAP in accordance with the Rule, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table as described in the text preceding the table. A reconciliation of the adjustments is set forth in a table following these footnotes.
       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote
(5)
In accordance with the Rule, Peer Group TSR is determined using the same peer group used in the CD&A and identified in
Exhibit A
, weighted according to the respective peers’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. This peer group was consistent throughout the five-year period displayed, except that Clearway Energy, Inc. was added in 2024, and South Jersey Industries, Inc. was part of the peer group until it was acquired in 2023. El Paso Electric was also part of the peer group in 2020, until they were acquired in July 2020. Each adjustment to the peer group was made to provide a better comparator group to the Company.
       
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 4,137,585 $ 3,537,654 $ 3,641,640 $ 3,759,354 $ 3,824,428
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 3,721,091 2,579,106 3,295,181 3,369,633 1,386,395
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote
Year
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
   
(Minus)

Change in
Accumulated
Benefits
Under
Defined
Benefit and
Actuarial
Pension
Plans
   
Plus

Service
Costs
Under
Defined
Benefit
and
Actuarial
Pension
Plans
    
(Minus)

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
Granted in
Fiscal Year
   
Plus

Fair Value
at Fiscal
Year-End
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Granted in
Fiscal Year
    
(Minus)/
Plus

Fair Value
at Fiscal
Year-End
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Granted in
Prior Fiscal
Years
   
Plus

Fair
Value at
Vesting
of Stock
Awards
Granted
in Fiscal
Year
that
Vested
During
Fiscal
Year
    
Plus/
(Minus)

Change in
Fair Value
as of
Vesting
Date of
Stock
Awards
Granted
in Prior
Years for
which
Applicable
Vesting
Conditions
were
Satisfied
During
Fiscal
Year
   
(Minus)

Fair Value
as of Prior
Fiscal
Year-End

of Stock
Awards
Granted
in Prior
Fiscal
Years that
Failed to
Meet
Applicable
Vesting
Conditions
During
Fiscal
Year
   
Equals

Compensation
Actually Paid
 
                           PEO
 
2024
    $4,137,585       $(572,759     $20,841      $ (1,629,976     $1,656,971        $21,990       $—        $86,439       $—       $3,721,091  
2023
    3,537,654       (398,487     20,015        (1,449,015     1,179,999        (294,636            (16,424           2,579,106  
2022
    3,641,640       (481,596     19,931        (1,450,637     1,437,741        (36,880            164,982             3,295,181  
2021
    3,759,354       (667,306     19,988        (1,360,798     1,409,352        55,819              153,224             3,369,633  
2020
    3,824,428       (1,039,036     19,016        (1,211,009     756,352        (620,683            (342,673           1,386,395  
                           Other NEOs (Average)
 
2024
    $1,320,446       $(36,293     $17,717        $(450,767     $455,296        $4,107       $—        $14,871       $—       $1,325,377  
2023
    1,139,993       (68,223     14,116        (372,021     302,953        (72,345            4,113       (57,817     890,769  
2022
    1,153,599             21,281        (412,749     409,084        (10,518            41,779             1,202,476  
2021
    1,133,392       (35,483     21,162        (392,592     406,594        15,053              48,728             1,196,854  
2020
    1,110,184       (150,977     17,045        (334,305     208,795        (183,708            (87,794           579,240  
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 1,320,446 1,139,993 1,153,599 1,133,392 1,110,184
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 1,325,377 890,769 1,202,476 1,196,854 579,240
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote
Year
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
   
(Minus)

Change in
Accumulated
Benefits
Under
Defined
Benefit and
Actuarial
Pension
Plans
   
Plus

Service
Costs
Under
Defined
Benefit
and
Actuarial
Pension
Plans
    
(Minus)

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
Granted in
Fiscal Year
   
Plus

Fair Value
at Fiscal
Year-End
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Granted in
Fiscal Year
    
(Minus)/
Plus

Fair Value
at Fiscal
Year-End
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Stock
Awards
Granted in
Prior Fiscal
Years
   
Plus

Fair
Value at
Vesting
of Stock
Awards
Granted
in Fiscal
Year
that
Vested
During
Fiscal
Year
    
Plus/
(Minus)

Change in
Fair Value
as of
Vesting
Date of
Stock
Awards
Granted
in Prior
Years for
which
Applicable
Vesting
Conditions
were
Satisfied
During
Fiscal
Year
   
(Minus)

Fair Value
as of Prior
Fiscal
Year-End

of Stock
Awards
Granted
in Prior
Fiscal
Years that
Failed to
Meet
Applicable
Vesting
Conditions
During
Fiscal
Year
   
Equals

Compensation
Actually Paid
 
                           PEO
 
2024
    $4,137,585       $(572,759     $20,841      $ (1,629,976     $1,656,971        $21,990       $—        $86,439       $—       $3,721,091  
2023
    3,537,654       (398,487     20,015        (1,449,015     1,179,999        (294,636            (16,424           2,579,106  
2022
    3,641,640       (481,596     19,931        (1,450,637     1,437,741        (36,880            164,982             3,295,181  
2021
    3,759,354       (667,306     19,988        (1,360,798     1,409,352        55,819              153,224             3,369,633  
2020
    3,824,428       (1,039,036     19,016        (1,211,009     756,352        (620,683            (342,673           1,386,395  
                           Other NEOs (Average)
 
2024
    $1,320,446       $(36,293     $17,717        $(450,767     $455,296        $4,107       $—        $14,871       $—       $1,325,377  
2023
    1,139,993       (68,223     14,116        (372,021     302,953        (72,345            4,113       (57,817     890,769  
2022
    1,153,599             21,281        (412,749     409,084        (10,518            41,779             1,202,476  
2021
    1,133,392       (35,483     21,162        (392,592     406,594        15,053              48,728             1,196,854  
2020
    1,110,184       (150,977     17,045        (334,305     208,795        (183,708            (87,794           579,240  
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
CAP Versus TSR
Of the measures displayed in the above table, TSR has the most direct and significant impact on CEO and other NEO CAP calculations. This is primarily driven by our compensation program design, which is structured with a significant portion of compensation, and 100% incentive equity awards,
at-risk.
Approximately 49% of CEO compensation and approximately 36% of the average of other NEO compensation granted annually is composed of RSUs and performance share awards, and therefore is directly impacted by TSR. Additionally, the Rule requires that for each year that CAP is presented, outstanding but unvested equity awards are effectively
re-calculated
using the stock price as of the end of the applicable year. While similar values of RSUs and performance share awards were granted across the five years displayed, the onset of the pandemic in 2020 brought volatile stock markets and a
-35.44%
TSR and, using the Rule calculations, significantly reduced CAP for that year. Despite utilities being one of the few sectors to maintain or exceed EPS estimates throughout 2020, they experienced one of the largest price to earnings contractions during that time. Even though the Company’s 2021 annual TSR was 10.31%, the price contraction generally persisted through 2021 as utilities underperformed the broader market amidst rising interest rates, smaller cap utilities underperformed larger cap utilities, and electric utilities
out-performed
gas utilities. For 2022, the Company’s annual TSR was 1.44%, which, while above the average LTIP peer group TSR of 0.37%, was on par with the S&P Utility Index return of 1.57% for the year, reflecting market volatility amid a historically fast rising interest rate environment, uncertainty regarding Federal Reserve actions, and other factors. In 2022, the Company’s TSR significantly outperformed the broader S&P 500, which provided a
-18.17%
annual TSR. In 2023 the Company’s
one-year
TSR was
-14.49%
as energy utility stocks continued to be under pressure due to higher interest rates, with greater underperformance in smaller utilities with less stock liquidity, and in gas and electric utilities in the Pacific Northwest, particularly in states considering building codes affecting natural gas. In 2024, the Company’s
one-year
TSR was positive at 6.76%, albeit lower than the S&P Utility Index TSR of 23.22%, which included electric utilities that benefited
 
from the prospective demand growth from artificial intelligence data centers. These macro trends resulted in larger movements in TSR and CAP calculations shown in the table below. The CAP table above and charts below do not display the 25% reduction in performance share awards paid due to lower than targeted relative TSR results in each of 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 for the years preceding vesting.
The graph below shows the relationship between (1) CAP to our CEO and the average of the CAP to our other NEOs, and (2) our cumulative TSR and peer group cumulative TSR, over the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2024. The stock performance shown in the graph is not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance.
 
LOGO
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
CAP
Versus
Net Income
The Rule requires that net income be presented as a performance measure in the CAP table above. In addition, net income comprises approximately 50% of the formula for the EAIP. The graph below shows the relationship between CAP to our CEO and the average of the CAP to our other NEOs and the Company’s net income over the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2024, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
LOGO
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure
Earnings Per Share
EPS is the Company-selected measure because three-year cumulative EPS is the predominant metric used in our performance share awards under our LTIP and because it aligns executives’ interests with shareholder’s interests and drives a focus on earnings. The Rules do not appear to permit a multi-year financial measure such as three-year cumulative EPS, so EPS was selected as the most closely aligned measure. The graph below shows the relationship between CAP paid to our CEO and the average of our other NEOs and our EPS for each of the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2024.
 
 
LOGO
       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group
CAP Versus TSR
Of the measures displayed in the above table, TSR has the most direct and significant impact on CEO and other NEO CAP calculations. This is primarily driven by our compensation program design, which is structured with a significant portion of compensation, and 100% incentive equity awards,
at-risk.
Approximately 49% of CEO compensation and approximately 36% of the average of other NEO compensation granted annually is composed of RSUs and performance share awards, and therefore is directly impacted by TSR. Additionally, the Rule requires that for each year that CAP is presented, outstanding but unvested equity awards are effectively
re-calculated
using the stock price as of the end of the applicable year. While similar values of RSUs and performance share awards were granted across the five years displayed, the onset of the pandemic in 2020 brought volatile stock markets and a
-35.44%
TSR and, using the Rule calculations, significantly reduced CAP for that year. Despite utilities being one of the few sectors to maintain or exceed EPS estimates throughout 2020, they experienced one of the largest price to earnings contractions during that time. Even though the Company’s 2021 annual TSR was 10.31%, the price contraction generally persisted through 2021 as utilities underperformed the broader market amidst rising interest rates, smaller cap utilities underperformed larger cap utilities, and electric utilities
out-performed
gas utilities. For 2022, the Company’s annual TSR was 1.44%, which, while above the average LTIP peer group TSR of 0.37%, was on par with the S&P Utility Index return of 1.57% for the year, reflecting market volatility amid a historically fast rising interest rate environment, uncertainty regarding Federal Reserve actions, and other factors. In 2022, the Company’s TSR significantly outperformed the broader S&P 500, which provided a
-18.17%
annual TSR. In 2023 the Company’s
one-year
TSR was
-14.49%
as energy utility stocks continued to be under pressure due to higher interest rates, with greater underperformance in smaller utilities with less stock liquidity, and in gas and electric utilities in the Pacific Northwest, particularly in states considering building codes affecting natural gas. In 2024, the Company’s
one-year
TSR was positive at 6.76%, albeit lower than the S&P Utility Index TSR of 23.22%, which included electric utilities that benefited
 
from the prospective demand growth from artificial intelligence data centers. These macro trends resulted in larger movements in TSR and CAP calculations shown in the table below. The CAP table above and charts below do not display the 25% reduction in performance share awards paid due to lower than targeted relative TSR results in each of 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 for the years preceding vesting.
The graph below shows the relationship between (1) CAP to our CEO and the average of the CAP to our other NEOs, and (2) our cumulative TSR and peer group cumulative TSR, over the five fiscal years ending December 31, 2024. The stock performance shown in the graph is not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance.
 
LOGO
       
Tabular List, Table
Performance Measures and Other Considerations
The seven performance measures listed below represent the most important measures the Company used to determine NEO compensation for fiscal year 2024. We have also identified other considerations related to compensation decisions. The use of each measure and the other identified considerations are further described in the CD&A.
 
Financial Performance Measures
Selected
  
Other Considerations Related to Compensation Decisions
Net Income
 
Earnings Per Share
 
3-Year
Cumulative EPS
 
Total Shareholder Return
 
Return on Invested Capital
 
Return on Equity
 
3-Year
Relative TSR
   In addition to the performance measures listed here, the OECC considers a range of factors in determining NEO compensation that is aligned with Company performance and achieves the OECC’s other goals. Additional performance measures that were utilized by the OECC in compensation decisions include: customer satisfaction, market share and customer growth, public safety, employee safety, execution of the Company’s strategic plans, advancement of goals related to decarbonization of the Company’s natural gas systems, achievement of constructive regulatory objectives, successful execution of the Company’s water sector growth objectives, growth and execution of the Company’s unregulated RNG business, sustained strong employee engagement, certain operational targets, and implementation of enhancements to disclosure and communications to convey the Company’s community and sustainability objectives. For additional information regarding our NEO’s 2024 performance and the role of the performance measures in our compensation program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” above.
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 65.93 61.72 72.15 71.13 64.48
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 106.5 96.61 101.83 101.46 86.65
Net Income (Loss) $ 78,871,000 $ 93,868,000 $ 86,303,000 $ 78,666,000 $ 76,781,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 2.03 2.59 2.54 2.56 2.51
Measure:: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Net Income        
Measure:: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Earnings Per Share        
Measure:: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name 3-Year Cumulative EPS        
Measure:: 4          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Total Shareholder Return        
Measure:: 5          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Return on Invested Capital        
Measure:: 6          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Return on Equity        
Measure:: 7          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name 3-Year Relative TSR        
PEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (572,759) $ (398,487) $ (481,596) $ (667,306) $ (1,039,036)
PEO | Pension Adjustments Prior Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 20,841 20,015 19,931 19,988 19,016
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (1,629,976) (1,449,015) (1,450,637) (1,360,798) (1,211,009)
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 1,656,971 1,179,999 1,437,741 1,409,352 756,352
PEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 21,990 (294,636) (36,880) 55,819 (620,683)
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0 0
PEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 86,439 (16,424) 164,982 153,224 (342,673)
PEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (36,293) (68,223) 0 (35,483) (150,977)
Non-PEO NEO | Pension Adjustments Prior Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 17,717 14,116 21,281 21,162 17,045
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (450,767) (372,021) (412,749) (392,592) (334,305)
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 455,296 302,953 409,084 406,594 208,795
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 4,107 (72,345) (10,518) 15,053 (183,708)
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 14,871 4,113 41,779 48,728 (87,794)
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 0 $ (57,817) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
v3.25.1
Award Timing Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Award Timing Disclosures [Line Items]  
Award Timing MNPI Disclosure
Equity Grant Practices
We did not grant options, stock appreciation rights (SARs) or similar option-like instruments during 2024 and do not currently intend to grant such awards to our directors and officers as part of our compensation program. Accordingly, we do not have a formal written policy in place with regard to the timing of grants of options, SARs or similar option-like instruments in relation to the disclosure of material nonpublic information.
MNPI Disclosure Timed for Compensation Value false
v3.25.1
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures [Line Items]  
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures Adopted true