UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
  
FORM 10-Q
 
ý       Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
 
or
 
o          Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the transition period from                to               
 
Commission File Number
1-11978  
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

			
Wisconsin	 	39-0448110	
(State or other jurisdiction	 	(I.R.S. Employer	
of incorporation or organization)	 	Identification Number)	

			
2400 South 44th Street,	 	 	
Manitowoc, Wisconsin	 	54221-0066	
(Address of principal executive offices)	 	(Zip Code)	
 
(920) 684-4410
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ý   No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  ý   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

			
Large accelerated filer  x	 	Accelerated filer  o	
 	 	 	
Non-accelerated filer  o	 	Smaller reporting company  o	
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	 	 	

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o   No  ý

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, as of June 30, 2016 , the most recent practicable date, was 137,576,641 .

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Financial Statements  

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-share and average shares data)

																
 	Three Months Ended
June 30,	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,	
 	2016	 	2015	 	2016	 	2015	
Net sales	$	457.7		 	$	477.7		 	$	885.1		 	$	884.4		
Cost of sales	369.5		 	382.8		 	715.0		 	714.1		
Gross profit	88.2		 	94.9		 	170.1		 	170.3		
Operating costs and expenses:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses	73.4		 	79.5		 	145.8		 	162.2		
Amortization expense	0.8		 	0.7		 	1.5		 	1.5		
Restructuring expense	8.8		 	0.6		 	13.2		 	0.8		
Other	0.4		 	(0.1	)	 	1.8		 	(0.1	)	
Total operating costs and expenses	83.4		 	80.7		 	162.3		 	164.4		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income	4.8		 	14.2		 	7.8		 	5.9		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other income (expense):	 		 	 		 	 	 	 	
Interest expense	(9.9	)	 	(24.0	)	 	(19.6	)	 	(47.3	)	
Amortization of deferred financing fees	(0.4	)	 	(1.0	)	 	(1.3	)	 	(2.1	)	
Loss on debt extinguishment	—		 	—		 	(76.3	)	 	—		
Other income - net	2.1		 	2.8		 	3.2		 	2.6		
Total other expense	(8.2	)	 	(22.2	)	 	(94.0	)	 	(46.8	)	
Loss from continuing operations before taxes on income	(3.4	)	 	(8.0	)	 	(86.2	)	 	(40.9	)	
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income	0.7		 	(1.7	)	 	122.2		 	(11.2	)	
Loss from continuing operations	(4.1	)	 	(6.3	)	 	(208.4	)	 	(29.7	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Discontinued operations:	 		 	 		 	 	 	 	
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes of $0.0, $16.5, ($1.3) and $24.7, respectively	(0.8	)	 	29.6		 	(4.0	)	 	44.6		
Net (loss) income	$	(4.9	)	 	$	23.3		 	$	(212.4	)	 	$	14.9		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic (loss) income per common share:	 		 	 		 	 	 	 	
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.03	)	 	$	(0.05	)	 	$	(1.52	)	 	$	(0.22	)	
(Loss) income from discontinued operations	(0.01	)	 	0.22		 	(0.03	)	 	0.33		
Basic (loss) income per common share	$	(0.04	)	 	$	0.17		 	$	(1.55	)	 	$	0.11		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted (loss) income per common share:	 		 	 		 	 	 	 	
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.03	)	 	$	(0.05	)	 	$	(1.52	)	 	$	(0.22	)	
(Loss) income from discontinued operations	(0.01	)	 	0.21		 	(0.03	)	 	0.32		
Diluted (loss) income per common share:	$	(0.04	)	 	$	0.17		 	$	(1.55	)	 	$	0.11		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic	137,138,220		 	136,130,861		 	136,869,066		 	135,887,738		
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted	137,138,220		 	137,985,899		 	136,869,066		 	137,431,565		
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
(Unaudited)
(In millions)

	
																
 	Three Months Ended
June 30,	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,	
 	2016	 	2015	 	2016	 	2015	
Net (loss) income	$	(4.9	)	 	$	23.3		 	$	(212.4	)	 	$	14.9		
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Unrealized (loss) income on derivatives, net of income tax provision (benefit) of $0.0, $2.5, $0.0 and $(0.2), respectively	(0.1	)	 	4.3		 	1.5		 	0.2		
Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of income tax provision of $0.0, $0.5, $0.0 and $1.0, respectively	1.2		 	1.4		 	2.4		 	2.8		
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(17.4	)	 	8.6		 	31.8		 	(54.2	)	
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	(16.3	)	 	14.3		 	35.7		 	(51.2	)	
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(21.2	)	 	$	37.6		 	$	(176.7	)	 	$	(36.3	)	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except share data)

								
 	June 30,
2016	 	December 31,
2015	
Assets	 		 	 		
Current Assets:	 		 	 		
Cash and temporary investments	$	40.8		 	$	31.5		
Restricted cash	16.3		 	16.9		
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $12.5 and $12.8, respectively	189.7		 	155.7		
Inventories — net	499.9		 	452.6		
Notes receivable	58.2		 	59.7		
Other current assets	45.2		 	43.0		
Current assets of discontinued operations	—		 	254.2		
  Total current assets	850.1		 	1,013.6		
 	 	 	 	
Property, plant and equipment — net	415.4		 	410.7		
Goodwill	307.5		 	306.5		
Other intangible assets — net	118.7		 	119.3		
Other long-term assets	68.6		 	182.6		
Long-term assets held for sale	5.6		 	5.5		
Long-term assets of discontinued operations	—		 	1,501.5		
  Total assets	$	1,765.9		 	$	3,539.7		
Liabilities and Equity	 		 	 		
Current Liabilities:	 		 	 		
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	395.5		 	$	436.3		
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	17.2		 	67.2		
Product warranties	38.3		 	35.9		
Customer advances	9.8		 	10.3		
Product liabilities	22.1		 	21.9		
Current liabilities of discontinued operations	—		 	312.0		
  Total current liabilities	482.9		 	883.6		
Non-Current Liabilities:	 		 	 		
Long-term debt	275.0		 	1,330.4		
Deferred income taxes	40.6		 	25.6		
Pension obligations	78.7		 	99.4		
Postretirement health and other benefit obligations	37.1		 	44.4		
Long-term deferred revenue	22.5		 	29.7		
Other non-current liabilities	77.8		 	87.3		
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations	—		 	219.8		
  Total non-current liabilities	531.7		 	1,836.6		
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)			 			
Total Equity:	 		 	 		
Common stock (300,000,000 shares authorized, 163,175,928 shares issued, 137,576,641 and 136,617,161 shares outstanding, respectively)	1.4		 	1.4		
Additional paid-in capital	564.2		 	558.0		
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(123.4	)	 	(207.8	)	
Retained earnings	378.3		 	539.5		
Treasury stock, at cost (25,599,287 and 26,558,767 shares, respectively)	(69.2	)	 	(71.6	)	
  Total equity	751.3		 	819.5		
  Total liabilities and equity	$	1,765.9		 	$	3,539.7		

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
(Unaudited)
(In millions)

	
								
 	Six Months Ended
June 30,	
 	2016	 	2015	
Cash Flows from Operations:	 		 	 		
Net (loss) income	$	(212.4	)	 	$	14.9		
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash used for operating activities of continuing operations:	 		 	 		
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	4.0		 	(44.6	)	
Depreciation	23.6		 	24.0		
Amortization of intangible assets	1.5		 	1.5		
Amortization of deferred financing fees	1.3		 	2.1		
Deferred income taxes	125.2		 	32.8		
Loss on early debt extinguishment	15.4		 	—		
Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment	1.7		 	(0.6	)	
Other	(4.5	)	 	6.1		
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of business acquisitions and divestitures:	 		 	 		
Accounts receivable	(33.3	)	 	(1.0	)	
Inventories	(43.0	)	 	(95.6	)	
Other assets	(2.2	)	 	(8.9	)	
Accounts payable	(40.8	)	 	7.5		
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	0.9		 	22.2		
Net cash used for operating activities of continuing operations	(162.6	)	 	(39.6	)	
Net cash used for operating activities of discontinued operations	(63.9	)	 	(40.6	)	
Net cash used for operating activities	(226.5	)	 	(80.2	)	
 	 	 	 	
Cash Flows from Investing:	 		 	 		
Capital expenditures	(24.7	)	 	(22.5	)	
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	0.9		 	5.1		
Restricted cash	0.3		 	3.3		
Net cash used for investing activities of continuing operations	(23.5	)	 	(14.1	)	
Net cash used for investing activities of discontinued operations	(2.4	)	 	(7.0	)	
Net cash used for investing activities	(25.9	)	 	(21.1	)	
 	 	 	 	
Cash Flows from Financing:	 		 	 		
Proceeds from revolving credit facility	—		 	142.0		
Payments on long-term debt	(1,365.9	)	 	(34.6	)	
Proceeds from long-term debt	261.1		 	1.4		
Payments on notes financing	(5.0	)	 	(9.3	)	
Debt issuance costs	(8.3	)	 	—		
Exercises of stock options	2.5		 	3.9		
       Dividend from spun-off subsidiary	1,361.7		 	—		
      Cash transferred to spun-off subsidiary	(17.7	)	 	—		
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations	228.4		 	103.4		
Net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations	0.2		 	0.2		
Net cash provided by financing activities	228.6		 	103.6		
 	 	 	 	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	1.2		 	(2.6	)	
 	 	 	 	
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(22.6	)	 	(0.3	)	
Balance at beginning of period, including cash of discontinued operations of $31.9 and $16.5	63.4		 	68.0		
Balance at end of period, including cash of discontinued operations of $0.0 and $14.8	$	40.8		 	$	67.7		

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
1. Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Board of Directors of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (“Manitowoc,” “MTW,” and the “Company”) approved the tax-free spin-off of the Company’s foodservice business (“MFS”) into an independent, public company (the “Spin-Off”). To consummate the Spin-Off, the Board declared a pro rata dividend of MFS common stock to MTW’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 22, 2016 (the "Record Date"), payable on March 4, 2016. Each MTW stockholder received one  share of MFS common stock for every share of MTW common stock held as of the close of business on the Record Date.
In these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, unless otherwise indicated, references to Manitowoc, MTW and the Company, refer to The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Spin-Off, or, in the case of information as of dates or for periods prior to the Spin-Off, the consolidated entities of the Crane business and certain other assets and liabilities that were historically held at the MTW corporate level but were specifically identifiable and attributable to the Crane business. The Company is a leading providers of engineered lifting equipment for the global construction industry, including lattice-boom cranes, tower cranes, mobile telescopic cranes, and boom trucks.
As a result of the Spin-Off, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related financial information reflect MFS operations, assets and liabilities, and cash flows as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Refer to Note 2, "Discontinued Operations," for additional information regarding the Spin-Off.
Subsequent to the Spin-Off, the management team determined that Manitowoc has one reportable segment, the Crane business. The Company identified its segment using the “management approach,” which designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , the cash flows for the same six -month periods, and the financial position at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , and except as otherwise discussed, such adjustments consist of only those of a normal recurring nature.  The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year and do not contain information included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2015 .  Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations dealing with interim financial statements.  However, the Company believes that the disclosures made in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. All dollar amounts, except share and per share amounts, are in millions of dollars throughout the tables included in these notes unless otherwise indicated.
During the first quarter of 2016 , in conjunction with the Spin-Off, the Company identified an out-of-period adjustment related to deferred tax assets which originated prior to 2010, whereby the Company had understated the deferred tax assets by $6.2 million at each balance sheet date prior to March 31, 2016. In the first quarter of 2016 , the Company recorded an adjustment to the deferred tax assets and the income tax provision on continuing operations to record the out-of-period adjustment.  Additionally, the Company identified an out-of-period adjustment in MFS’ deferred tax assets, which also originated prior to 2010, whereby the Company had understated the deferred tax assets by $2.9 million at each balance sheet date prior to March 31, 2016. In the first quarter of 2016, prior to the Spin-Off, the Company recorded an adjustment to the deferred tax assets and the income tax provision on discontinued operations to correct the out-of-period adjustment.  The Company does not believe that these adjustments were material to its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company identified two adjustments to the previously issued financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2016. In evaluating whether the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements were materially misstated, the Company considered the guidance in ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1, Assessing Materiality . The Company determined that these errors were not material to the Company's prior interim period consolidated financial statements and therefore, amendment of the previously filed report was not required. However, the Company determined that the impact of the corrections would be too significant to record

5

within the second quarter of 2016. As such, the revision for the corrections is reflected in the financial information of the applicable prior periods in this Form 10-Q filing.
The adjustments identified during the second quarter of 2016 are as follows:

•	Adjustment related to accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL"), whereby the Company had understated loss on debt extinguishment by $4.3 million , overstated income tax expense by $0.8 million , and understated loss from continuing operations by $3.5 million in the first quarter of 2016. The adjustment also resulted in an overstatement of AOCL and understatement of retained earnings by $2.6 million as of March 31, 2016.	

•	Adjustment related to the classification of income tax expense between continuing operations and discontinued operations in the three months ended March 31, 2015, whereby the Company had understated the benefit for taxes on continuing operations, and understated the income tax provision on discontinued operations by $2.1 million .	
A summary of the adjustments on the impacted financial statement line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as revised and as previously presented in the March 31, 2016, Form 10-Q is as follows:

																
 	Three Months Ended
March 31, 2016	 	Three Months Ended
March 31, 2015	
 	As revised	 	As previously presented	 	As revised	 	As previously presented	
Loss on debt extinguishment	$	(76.3	)	 	$	(72.0	)	 	$	—		 	$	—		
Loss from continuing operations before taxes on income	(82.8	)	 	(78.5	)	 	(32.9	)	 	(32.9	)	
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income	121.5		 	122.3		 	(9.5	)	 	(7.4	)	
Loss from continuing operations	(204.3	)	 	(200.8	)	 	(23.4	)	 	(25.5	)	
Discontinued operations:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(3.2	)	 	(3.2	)	 	15.0		 	17.1		
Net loss	$	(207.5	)	 	$	(204.0	)	 	$	(8.4	)	 	$	(8.4	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Loss per common share - basic and diluted	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
  Loss from continuing operations	$	(1.50	)	 	$	(1.47	)	 	$	(0.17	)	 	$	(0.19	)	
  (Loss) income from discontinued operations	(0.02	)	 	(0.02	)	 	0.11		 	0.13		
  Loss per common share	$	(1.52	)	 	$	(1.49	)	 	$	(0.06	)	 	$	(0.06	)	

2. Discontinued Operations
On March 4, 2016, Manitowoc completed the Spin-Off of MFS. The financial results of MFS are presented as income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table presents the financial results of MFS through the date of the Spin-Off for the indicated periods and do not include corporate overhead allocations:

6

	
																	
Major classes of line items constituting earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes related to MFS	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended
June 30,	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,	
(in millions)	 	2016	 	2015	 	2016	 	2015	
Net sales	 	$	—		 	$	407.7		 	$	219.6		 	$	753.1		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cost of sales	 	—		 	280.1		 	141.5		 	518.4		
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses	 	—		 	65.2		 	48.3		 	141.1		
Amortization expense	 	—		 	7.9		 	5.2		 	15.7		
Restructuring expense	 	—		 	(0.5	)	 	0.3		 	0.4		
Separation expense	 	0.7		 	8.3		 	27.7		 	9.8		
Other	 	—		 	0.5		 	—		 	0.5		
Total operating costs and expenses	 	0.7		 	361.5		 	223.0		 	685.9		
(Loss) earnings from operations	 	(0.7	)	 	46.2		 	(3.4	)	 	67.2		
Other (expense) income	 	—		 	(0.2	)	 	(1.8	)	 	2.2		
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes	 	(0.7	)	 	46.0		 	(5.2	)	 	69.4		
(Benefit) provision for taxes on earnings	 	—		 	16.4		 	(1.3	)	 	24.7		
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	 	$	(0.7	)	 	$	29.6		 	$	(3.9	)	 	$	44.7		
 
The assets and liabilities of MFS have been classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2015 . No assets or liabilities of MFS are reflected on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2016 . These amounts consisted of the following carrying amounts in each major class at December 31, 2015 .

						
Carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of discontinued operations related to MFS	 	 	
(in millions)	 	 	December 31,
2015	
Assets	 	 	 	
Cash and temporary investments	 	 	$	31.9		
Restricted cash	 	 	0.6		
Accounts receivable - net	 	 	63.8		
Inventories - net	 	 	145.9		
Other current assets	 	 	12.0		
Property, plant and equipment - net	 	 	116.3		
Goodwill	 	 	845.8		
Other intangible assets - net	 	 	519.5		
Other long-term assets	 	 	16.2		
Long-term assets held for sale	 	 	3.7		
Total major classes of assets of discontinued operations	 	 	$	1,755.7		
 	 	 	 	
Liabilities	 	 	 	
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	 	 	$	271.6		
Current portion of long-term debt	 	 	0.4		
Other current liabilities	 	 	40.0		
Long-term debt	 	 	2.3		
Deferred income taxes	 	 	167.9		
Pension	 	 	29.3		
Postretirement health and other benefit obligations	 	 	3.0		
Other non-current liabilities	 	 	17.3		
Total major classes of liabilities of discontinued operations	 	 	$	531.8		

7

Manitowoc and MFS entered into several agreements in connection with the separation, including a transition services agreement ("TSA"), separation and distribution agreement, tax matters agreement, intellectual property matters agreement, and an employee matters agreement.
Pursuant to the TSA, Manitowoc, MFS and their respective subsidiaries are providing various services to each other on an interim, transitional basis. Services being provided by Manitowoc include, among others, finance, information technology and certain other administrative services. The services generally commenced on March 4, 2016 and are expected to terminate within 12 months of that date. Billings by Manitowoc under the TSA are recorded as a reduction of the costs to provide the respective service in the applicable expense category.
During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , the Company recorded $0.7 million and $8.3 million , respectively, of separation costs related to the Spin-Off. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 the Company recorded $27.7 million and $9.8 million , respectively, of separation costs related to the Spin-Off. Separation costs consist primarily of professional and consulting fees, and are included in the results of discontinued operations.
The following selected financial data of various other businesses disposed of prior to 2014, consisting primarily of administrative costs, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the results of operations would have been had the businesses operated as stand-alone entities.  

																	
 	 	Three Months Ended
June 30,	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,	
(in millions)	 	2016	 	2015	 	2016	 	2015	
Net sales	 	$	—		 	$	—		 	$	—		 	$	—		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Pretax (loss) income from discontinued operations	 	(0.1	)	 	0.1		 	(0.1	)	 	(0.1	)	
Provision for taxes on income	 	—		 	0.1		 	—		 	—		
Net loss from discontinued operations	 	$	(0.1	)	 	$	—		 	$	(0.1	)	 	$	(0.1	)	
In 2014, the Company sold its interest in Manitowoc Dong Yue. Subsequent to the sale, Manitowoc Dong Yue had approximately $17.3 million of third party debt outstanding under a loan agreement entered into during the first quarter of 2014 that the Company has fully guaranteed. The loan is fully secured by Manitowoc Dong Yue’s fixed assets as well as finished goods inventory. Manitowoc Dong Yue is repaying the loan over a four -year period, with the last payment due on December 31, 2017.
3. Acquisitions and Disposals
Foodservice businesses
On October 21, 2015 , MFS acquired the remaining 50.0% of outstanding shares of a joint venture in Thailand. Welbilt Thailand is a manufacturer of kitchen equipment in Southeast Asia. The purchase price, net of cash acquired, was approximately $5.3 million . Allocation of the purchase price resulted in $1.4 million of goodwill and $4.2 million of intangible assets. The results of Welbilt Thailand were included in the results of MFS since the date of acquisition, and, thus, are now classified in discontinued operations.
On December 7, 2015, Manitowoc announced the completion of the sale of a non-material MFS subsidiary, Kysor Panel Systems, a manufacturer of wood frame and high-density rail panel systems for walk-in freezers and coolers for the retail and convenience-store markets. The sale price for the transaction was approximately $85 million , with cash proceeds received of approximately $78 million , which were used to reduce outstanding debt. As a result of the Spin-Off, the results of this business are classified in discontinued operations.
4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by level within the fair value hierarchy.  Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

8

	
																
 	Fair Value as of June 30, 2016	
(in millions)	Level 1	 	Level 2	 	Level 3	 	Total	
Current Assets:	 		 	 		 	 		 	 		
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	—		 	$	0.3		 	$	—		 	$	0.3		
Commodity contracts	—		 	0.1		 	—		 	0.1		
Total current assets at fair value	$	—		 	$	0.4		 	$	—		 	$	0.4		
Current Liabilities:	 		 	 		 	 		 	 		
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	—		 	$	5.3		 	$	—		 	$	5.3		
Commodity contracts	—		 	0.1		 	—		 	0.1		
Total current liabilities at fair value	$	—		 	$	5.4		 	$	—		 	$	5.4		

																
 	Fair Value as of December 31, 2015	
(in millions)	Level 1	 	Level 2	 	Level 3	 	Total	
Current Assets:	 		 	 		 	 		 	 		
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	—		 	$	0.3		 	$	—		 	$	0.3		
Total current assets at fair value	$	—		 	$	0.3		 	$	—		 	$	0.3		
Current Liabilities:	 		 	 		 	 		 	 		
Foreign currency exchange contracts	$	—		 	$	1.1		 	$	—		 	$	1.1		
Commodity contracts	—		 	0.7		 	—		 	0.7		
    Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed	—		 	1.7		 	—		 	1.7		
Total current liabilities at fair value	$	—		 	$	3.5		 	$	—		 	$	3.5		
Non-current Liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed	$	—		 	$	0.6		 	$	—		 	$	0.6		
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		 	0.1		 	—		 	0.1		
Total non-current liabilities at fair value	$	—		 	$	0.7		 	$	—		 	$	0.7		
The fair value of the Company's 12.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 was $280.3 million as of June 30, 2016 . The fair value of the Company’s 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 was $623.1 million as of December 31, 2015 and the fair value of the Company’s 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 was $310.6 million as of December 31, 2015 ; these Senior Notes were redeemed on March 3, 2016 . The fair values of the Company’s previously outstanding Term Loans under its Prior Senior Credit Facility, which was replaced by the ABL Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in N ote 9, “Debt”) on March 3, 2016 , were as follows as of December 31, 2015 : Term Loan A - $307.7 million and Term Loan B - $116.7 million . The Term Loans were repaid in conjunction with the Spin-Off. See Note 9, “Debt,” for a description of the debt instruments and their related carrying values.
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurement,” defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820-10 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

		
Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities	
 	 	
Level 2	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or	
 	 	
 	Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or	
 	 	
 	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability	
 	 	
Level 3	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability	
The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Company

9

estimates the fair value of its Senior Notes and previously outstanding Term Loans based on quoted market prices of the instruments; because these markets are typically thinly traded, the assets and liabilities are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, deferred purchase price notes on receivables sold (see Note 10, “Accounts Receivable Securitization”) and short-term variable debt, including any amounts outstanding under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility, approximate fair value, without being discounted as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
As a result of its global operating and financing activities, the Company is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices, which may adversely affect the Company’s operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, the Company minimizes these risks through the use of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes, and the Company does not use leveraged derivative financial instruments. The foreign currency exchange, commodity and interest rate contracts are valued through an independent valuation source that uses an industry standard data provider, with resulting valuations periodically validated through third-party or counterparty quotes. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2.

10

5. Derivative Financial Instruments
Use of derivative instruments is consistent with the overall business and risk management objectives of the Company.  Derivative instruments may be used to manage business risk within limits specified by the Company’s risk policy and to manage exposures that have been identified through the risk identification and measurement process, provided that they clearly qualify as “hedging” activities as defined in the risk policy.  Use of derivative instruments is not automatic, nor is it necessarily the only response to managing pertinent business risk.  Use is permitted only after the risks that have been identified are determined to exceed defined tolerance levels and are considered to be unavoidable. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes.
The primary risks managed by the Company by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk, commodity price risk and foreign currency exchange risk.  Interest rate swaps are used to manage interest rate or fair value risk.  Swap contracts on various commodities are used to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in the Company’s manufacturing processes.  The Company also enters into various foreign currency derivative instruments to manage foreign currency risk associated with the Company’s projected foreign currency denominated purchases, sales, and receivable and payable balances.
ASC Topic 815-10, “Derivatives and Hedging,” requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position.  In accordance with ASC Topic 815-10, the Company designates commodity swaps, foreign currency exchange contracts, and float-to-fixed interest rate derivative contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases of commodities and purchases and sales currencies, and of variable rate interest payments.  Also in accordance with ASC Topic 815-10, the Company designates fixed-to-float interest rate swaps as fair market value hedges of fixed rate debt, which synthetically swap the Company’s fixed rate debt to floating rate debt.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.  Gains and losses on the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.  In the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $0.2 million of unrealized losses net of tax related to commodity price and currency exchange rate hedging will be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings.  Foreign currency and commodity hedging is generally completed prospectively on a rolling basis for between twelve and twenty-four months, respectively, depending on the type of risk being hedged.
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , the Company had the following outstanding commodity and foreign currency exchange contracts that were intended to hedge forecasted transactions:

											
Designated Hedging Instruments	 	Units Hedged	 	 	 	 	
Commodity	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	 	Unit	 	Type	
Natural Gas	 	64,688		 	175,617		 	MMBtu	 	Cash Flow	
Steel	 	5,570		 	4,811		 	Tons	 	Cash Flow	

	
									
Designated Hedging Instruments	 	Units Hedged	 	 	
Short Currency	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	 	Type	
European Euro	 	30,002,158		 	—		 	Cash Flow	
South Korean Won	 	1,034,848,360		 	1,533,257,930		 	Cash Flow	
Singapore Dollar	 	3,000,000		 	1,800,000		 	Cash Flow	
United States Dollar	 	1,324,560		 	—		 	Cash Flow	
Japanese Yen	 	328,727,300		 	245,915,700		 	Cash Flow	
As of December 31, 2015 , the Company had $ 175.0 million notional amount of float-to-fixed interest rate swaps outstanding related to Term Loan A under the Prior Senior Credit Facility that were designated as cash flow hedges. As a result, $ 175.0 million of Term Loan A was hedged at an interest rate of 1.635% , plus the applicable spread based on the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio of the Company as defined under the Prior Senior Credit Facility at December 31, 2015 .
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , the Company had no outstanding fixed-to-float interest rate swaps related to the Senior Notes.

11

See Note 9, “Debt,” for a description of the debt instruments.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815-10, the gains or losses on the derivatives are recognized in current earnings within Other income, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , the Company had the following outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts that were not designated as hedging instruments:

												
Non Designated Hedging Instruments	 	Units Hedged	 	 	 	 	 	
Short Currency	 	June 30,
2016	 	December 31, 2015	 	 	Recognized Location	 	Purpose	
European Euro	 	8,612,505		 	20,490,320		 	 	Other income, net	 	Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement	
United States Dollar	 	2,852,568		 	17,321,106		 	 	Other income, net	 	Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement	
Japanese Yen	 	320,074,648		 	70,518,463		 	 	Other income, net	 	Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement	
British Pound Sterling	 	—		 	4,840,238		 	 	Other income, net	 	Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement	
Singapore Dollar	 	—		 	500,000		 	 	Other income, net	 	Accounts Payable and Receivable Settlement	
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments and recorded as assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was as follows: 

											
Designated Hedging Instruments	 	 	 	ASSET DERIVATIVES	
 	 	 	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
(in millions)	 	Balance Sheet Location	 	Fair Value	
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	 	 	 	 		 	 		
Foreign exchange contracts	 	Other current assets	 	$	0.3		 	$	0.3		
Commodity contracts	 	Other current assets	 	0.1		 	—		
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	 	 	 	$	0.4		 	$	0.3		

											
Total asset derivatives	 	 	 	$	0.4		 	$	0.3		

12

The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was as follows: 

											
 	 	 	 	LIABILITY DERIVATIVES	
 	 	 	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
(in millions)	 	Balance Sheet Location	 	Fair Value	
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	 	 	 	 		 	 		
Foreign exchange contracts	 	Accounts payable and accrued expenses	 	$	0.6		 	$	0.2		
Commodity contracts	 	Accounts payable and accrued expenses	 	0.1		 	0.7		
Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed	 	Accounts payable and accrued expenses	 	—		 	1.7		
Commodity contracts	 	Other non-current liabilities	 	—		 	0.1		
Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed	 	Other non-current liabilities	 	—		 	0.6		
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	 	 	 	$	0.7		 	$	3.3		

											
 	 	 	 	LIABILITY DERIVATIVES	
 	 	 	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
(in millions)	 	Balance Sheet Location	 	Fair Value	
Derivatives NOT designated as hedging instruments	 	 	 	 		 	 		
Foreign exchange contracts	 	Accounts payable and accrued expenses	 	$	4.7		 	$	0.9		
Total derivatives NOT designated as hedging instruments	 	 	 	$	4.7		 	$	0.9		
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liability derivatives	 	 	 	$	5.4		 	$	4.2		

13

6. Inventories
The components of inventories as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized as follows:

									
(in millions)	 	June 30,
2016	 	December 31,
2015	
Inventories — gross:	 	 		 	 		
Raw materials	 	$	126.3		 	$	155.3		
Work-in-process	 	112.9		 	116.3		
Finished goods	 	343.6		 	263.8		
Total inventories — gross	 	582.8		 	535.4		
Excess and obsolete inventory reserve	 	(49.4	)	 	(46.2	)	
Net inventories at FIFO cost	 	533.4		 	489.2		
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO value	 	(33.5	)	 	(36.6	)	
Inventories — net	 	$	499.9		 	$	452.6		
7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2016 are as follows:

					
(in millions)	 	Total	
Balance as of January 1, 2015	 	$	325.3		
Foreign currency impact	 	(18.8	)	
Balance as of December 31, 2015	 	306.5		
Foreign currency impact	 	1.0		
Gross balance as of June 30, 2016	 	307.5		
Accumulated asset impairments	 	—		
Net balance as of June 30, 2016	 	$	307.5		
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets under the guidance of ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” for its single reporting unit, cranes.
The Company performs an annual impairment review at June 30 of every year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company performs impairment reviews using a fair-value method based on the present value of future cash flows, which involves management’s judgments and assumptions about the amounts of those cash flows and the discount rates used. The estimated fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including recorded goodwill. Goodwill is then subject to risk of write-down to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.
As of June 30, 2016 , the Company performed its annual impairment analysis relative to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, and based on those results, no impairment was indicated. The Company continually monitors market conditions and determines if any additional interim reviews of goodwill, other intangibles or long-lived assets are warranted. In the event the Company determines that assets are impaired in the future, the Company would recognize a non-cash impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Results of Operations.
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net book value of the Company’s intangible assets other than goodwill at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

14

	
																									
 	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
(in millions)	 	Gross
Carrying
Amount	 	Accumulated
Amortization	 	Net
Book
Value	 	Gross
Carrying
Amount	 	Accumulated
Amortization	 	Net
Book
Value	
Trademarks and tradenames	 	$	94.9		 	$	—		 	$	94.9		 	$	94.2		 	$	—		 	$	94.2		
Customer relationships	 	10.3		 	(7.4	)	 	2.9		 	10.4		 	(7.1	)	 	3.3		
Patents	 	29.3		 	(27.5	)	 	1.8		 	29.1		 	(26.6	)	 	2.5		
Engineering drawings	 	10.3		 	(9.8	)	 	0.5		 	10.2		 	(9.3	)	 	0.9		
Distribution network	 	18.5		 	—		 	18.5		 	18.4		 	—		 	18.4		
Other intangibles	 	0.4		 	(0.3	)	 	0.1		 	0.3		 	(0.3	)	 	—		
Total	 	$	163.7		 	$	(45.0	)	 	$	118.7		 	$	162.6		 	$	(43.3	)	 	$	119.3		
Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $0.8 million and $0.7 million , respectively.
Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1.5 million and $1.5 million , respectively.
8. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized as follows:

									
(in millions)	 	June 30,
2016	 	December 31,
2015	
Trade accounts payable	 	$	228.7		 	$	268.5		
Interest payable	 	12.3		 	13.2		
Employee related expenses	 	58.9		 	60.1		
Restructuring expenses	 	11.3		 	6.5		
Profit sharing and incentives	 	6.1		 	2.4		
Deferred revenue - current	 	11.9		 	13.3		
Income taxes payable	 	1.0		 	4.4		
Miscellaneous accrued expenses	 	65.3		 	67.9		
Total	 	$	395.5		 	$	436.3		

15

9. Debt
Outstanding debt at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is summarized as follows:

									
(in millions)	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
Term loan A	 	$	—		 	$	312.8		
Term loan B	 	—		 	119.5		
Senior notes due 2020	 	—		 	613.1		
Senior notes due 2022	 	—		 	299.2		
Senior secured second lien notes due 2021	 	248.7		 	—		
Other	 	48.5		 	66.3		
Deferred financing costs	 	(5.0	)	 	(13.3	)	
Total debt	 	292.2		 	1,397.6		
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	 	(17.2	)	 	(67.2	)	
Long-term debt	 	$	275.0		 	$	1,330.4		
On March 3, 2016 , the Company entered into a $225.0 million Asset Based Revolving Credit Facility (as amended, the "ABL Revolving Credit Facility") by and among the Company and certain of its domestic and German subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as Joint Lead Arrangers. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility includes a $75.0 million Letter of Credit Facility, $10.0 million of which is available to the German borrower, with a term of 5 years.
Loans made under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base and are secured by certain inventories and fixed assets of the Company and the guarantors and are guaranteed by the material direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility contains a Fixed Charge Coverage springing financial covenant, which measures the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other adjustments (Adjusted EBITDA), as defined in the credit agreement, to (ii) fixed charges, as defined in the related credit agreement. The financial covenant is triggered only if the Company fails to maintain minimum levels of availability under the credit facility. If triggered, the Company must maintain a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 .
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties, events of default and customary covenants, including without limitation: limitations on indebtedness, capital expenditures, restricted payments, disposals, investments, and acquisitions.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility replaced the $1,050.0 million Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Prior Senior Credit Facility”), which the Company entered into on January 3, 2014. The Prior Senior Credit Facility included three different loan facilities. The first was a revolving facility with a five year term in the amount of $500.0 million . The second facility was Term Loan A in the aggregate amount of $350.0 million , with a term of five years. The third facility was Term Loan B in the aggregate amount of $200.0 million , with a term of seven years.
The termination of the Prior Senior Credit Facility resulted in a loss of $5.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing expenses.
As of December 31, 2015 , the Company had $175.0 million notional amount of float-to-fixed interest rate swaps outstanding related to Term Loan A under the Prior Senior Credit Facility that were designated as cash flow hedges. As a result, $175.0 million of Term Loan A was hedged at an interest rate of 1.635% , plus the applicable spread based on the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio of the Company as defined under the Prior Senior Credit Facility. Interest rate swaps were terminated concurrent with the separation resulting in a loss of $4.3 million .
On February 18, 2016 , the Company entered into an indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trust and collateral agent, and completed the sale of $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due August 15, 2021 (the " 2021 Notes"). Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. The 2021 Notes were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The 2021 Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Company's 100% owned domestic subsidiaries. These subsidiaries also guarantee the Company's obligations under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility together with certain of the Company's German

16

subsidiaries. The 2021 Notes contain affirmative and negative covenants that limit, among other things, the Company's ability to redeem or repurchase its debt, incur additional debt, make acquisitions, merge with other entities, pay dividends or distributions, repurchase capital stock, and create or become subject to liens and include customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing with respect to the 2021 Notes, then the trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the outstanding 2021 Notes may declare the principal and accrued interest to be due and payable immediately. In addition, in the case of an event of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy, all unpaid principal of, unamortized discount, and accrued and unpaid interest on all outstanding 2021 Notes will become due and payable immediately.
The notes are redeemable, at the Company’s option, in whole or in part from time to time, at any time prior to February 15, 2019 , at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued but unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, the Company may redeem the 2021 Notes in whole or in part for a premium at any time on or after February 15, 2019 . The following would be the principal and premium paid by the Company, expressed as percentages of the principal amount thereof, if it redeems the 2021 Notes during the periods as set forth below:

				
Start Date (on or after)	End Date (prior to)	Percentage	
2/15/2019	2/15/2020	106.375	%	
2/15/2020	8/15/2020	103.188	%	
8/15/2020	8/15/2021	100.000	%	
In addition, at any time prior to February 15, 2019 , the Company is permitted to, at its option, use the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the 2021 Notes at a redemption price of 112.75% , plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption; provided that (1) at least 65.0% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes outstanding remains outstanding immediately after any such redemption; and (2) the Company makes such redemptions not more than 90 days after the consummation of any such public offering. Further, the Company is required to offer to repurchase the 2021 Notes for cash at a price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event.
On March 3, 2016 , the Company redeemed its previously outstanding 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Prior 2020 Notes”) and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Prior 2022 Notes” and, together with the 2021 Notes and Prior 2020 Notes, the "Senior Notes") for $625.5 million and $330.5 million , or 104.250% and 110.167% as expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, respectively.
The redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $31.5 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $24.6 million related to the redemption premium and $6.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously monetized derivative assets related to fixed-to-float interest rate swaps were treated as an increase to the debt balance of the Prior 2020 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining monetization balance of $11.8 million as of March 3, 2016 , was amortized as a reduction to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016 .
The redemption of the Prior 2022 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $34.6 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $31.2 million related to the redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously, derivative liabilities related to termination of fixed-to-float swaps were treated as a decrease to the debt balance of the Prior 2022 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining balance of $0.7 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016 .
Outstanding balances under the Company's Prior Senior Credit Facility and Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes were repaid with proceeds from the 2021 Notes and a cash dividend from MFS in conjunction with the Spin-Off.
As of June 30, 2016 , the Company had outstanding $48.5 million of other indebtedness that has a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 5.26% .  This debt includes outstanding line of credit balances and capital lease obligations in its Americas, Asia-Pacific and European regions.
The Company had no borrowings on the ABL Revolving Credit Facility during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 . The interest rate of the ABL Revolving Credit Facility fluctuates based on excess availability.  Had the Company borrowed as of June 30, 2016 , the spreads for LIBOR and Prime borrowings were 1.50% and 0.50% , respectively, with excess availability of approximately $173.4 million , which represents revolver borrowing capacity of 197.7 million less letters of credit outstanding of 24.3 million .

17

As of June 30, 2016 , the Company had no interest rate swaps outstanding related to its Senior Notes.
The balance sheet values of the Senior Notes as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are not equal to the face value of the Senior Notes because of original issue discounts and gains (losses) of previously terminated fixed-to-float interest rate hedges (see Note 5, "Derivative Financial Instruments" for more information), respectively, which are included in the applicable balance sheet values.
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASC No. 2015-03 and has classified its net deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from long-term debt versus as a deferred asset.
As of June 30, 2016 , the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants in its debt instruments, inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and the 2021 Notes.  Based upon the Company's current plans and outlook, management believes the Company will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
10. Accounts Receivable Securitization
The Company maintains an accounts receivable securitization program with a commitment size of $75.0 million , whereby transactions under the program are accounted for as sales in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.”  Sales of trade receivables under the program are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the proceeds received, including collections on the deferred purchase price notes, are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  The Company deems the interest rate risk related to the deferred purchase price notes to be de minimis , primarily due to the short average collection cycle of the related receivables (i.e., less than 60 days) as noted below.
On March 3, 2016 , the Company entered into a Receivables Purchase Agreement ("RPA") among Manitowoc Funding, LLC ("MTW Funding"), as Seller, The Manitowoc Company, Inc., as Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Purchaser and as Agent. The RPA replaced the Fifth Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated December 15, 2014.
Under the RPA (and the related Purchase and Sale Agreements referenced in the RPA), the Company’s domestic trade accounts receivable are sold to MTW Funding which, in turn, sells, conveys, transfers and assigns to a third-party financial institution (“Purchaser”), all of MTW Funding's rights, title and interest in to a pool of receivables to the Purchaser.
The Purchaser receives ownership of the pool of receivables, in each instance. New receivables are purchased by MTW Funding and resold to the Purchaser as cash collections and reduce previously sold investments. The Company acts as the servicer (in such capacity, the "Servicer") of the receivables and, as, such administers, collects and otherwise enforces the receivables. The Servicer is compensated for doing so on terms that are generally consistent with what would be charged by an unrelated servicer. The Servicer initially receives payments made by obligors on the receivables but is required to remit those payments to the Purchaser in accordance with the RPA. The Purchaser has no recourse for uncollectible receivables.
Trade accounts receivables sold to the Purchaser and being serviced by the Company totaled $45.9 million and $64.2 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , respectively. 
Due to an average collection cycle of less than 60 days for such accounts receivable, as well as, the Company’s collection history, the fair value of the Company’s deferred purchase price notes approximates book value.  The fair value of the deferred purchase price notes recorded as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $37.3 million and $54.1 million , respectively, and is included in accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The securitization program also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other restrictions, these covenants require the Company to meet specified financial tests, which include a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio which is the same as the covenant ratio required per the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2016 , the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the RPA, as amended. Based on management’s current plans and outlook, it believes the Company will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
11.  Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company recorded income tax expense of $0.7 million compared to an income tax benefit of $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 . For the six months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company recorded income tax expense of $ 122.2 million , compared to an income tax benefit of $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 . The increase in the Company’s tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 relative to the prior year

18

relates primarily to a non-cash charge of $120.2 million in relation to the valuation allowance associated with the Company’s domestic federal and state deferred tax assets and attributes in connection with the Spin-Off. In addition to the non-cash charge related to the valuation allowance, the Company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates.
The Company has reserved all of its domestic net deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016 , with a valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes," which requires an estimation of the recoverability of the recorded income tax asset balances. As of June 30, 2016 , the Company has recorded $120.2 million of valuation allowances attributable to its domestic net deferred tax assets. The determination of recording and releasing valuation allowances against deferred tax assets is made, in part, pursuant to the Company’s assessment as to whether it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income against which benefits of the deferred tax assets may or may not be realized.
The Company will continue to periodically evaluate its valuation allowance requirements in light of changing facts and circumstances, and may adjust its deferred tax asset valuation allowances accordingly. It is reasonably possible that the Company will either add to, or reverse a portion of its existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future. Such changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances will be reflected in the current operations through the Company’s income tax provision, and could have a material effect on operating results.
The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $16.4 million as of June 30, 2016 , and $19.4 million as of December 31, 2015 . During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that $0.6 million of the unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate.
The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves.  As of June 30, 2016 , the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax positions it has taken will be sustained upon the resolution of its audits resulting in no material impact on its consolidated financial position and the results of operations and cash flows.  However, the final determination with respect to any tax audits, and any related litigation, could be materially different from the Company’s estimates and/or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.

19

12. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share: 

												
 	Three Months Ended
June 30,	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,	
 	2016	 	2015	 	2016	 	2015	
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	137,138,220		 	136,130,861		 	136,869,066		 	135,887,738		
Effect of dilutive securities	—		 	1,855,038		 	—		 	1,543,827		
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	137,138,220		 	137,985,899		 	136,869,066		 	137,431,565		
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 , 4.2 million and 2.2 million , respectively, of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options were anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 , respectively, 4.2 million and 2.2 million of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options were anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , the total number of potentially dilutive options was 1.6 million and 1.1 million , respectively. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations for the quarter, these dilutive options were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share since doing so would decrease the loss per share.
No dividends were paid during each of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 .
13.  Stockholders’ Equity
The following is a roll forward of retained earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 : 

					
(in millions)	 	Retained Earnings	
Balance at December 31, 2015	 	$	539.5		
Net loss	 	(212.4	)	
Distribution of MFS	 	51.2		
Balance at June 30, 2016	 	$	378.3		

					
(in millions)	 	Retained Earnings	
Balance at December 31, 2014	 	$	486.9		
Net income	 	14.9		
Balance at June 30, 2015	 	$	501.8		
Authorized capitalization consists of 300 million shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 3.5 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock.  None of the preferred shares have been issued.
Currently, the Company has authorization to purchase up to 2.4 million shares of common stock at management’s discretion; however, the Company has not purchased any shares of its common stock under this authorization since 2006.

20

	
																	
(in millions)	 	Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges	 	Pension & Postretirement	 	Foreign Currency Translation	 	Total	
Balance at December 31, 2015	 	$	(3.8	)	 	$	(82.6	)	 	$	(121.4	)	 	$	(207.8	)	
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	 	(2.7	)	 	—		 	49.2		 	46.5		
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	 	4.3		 	1.2		 	—		 	5.5		
Net current period other comprehensive income	 	1.6		 	1.2		 	49.2		 	52.0		
Distribution of MFS	 	2.1		 	44.5		 	2.1		 	48.7		
Balance at March 31, 2016	 	(0.1	)	 	(36.9	)	 	(70.1	)	 	(107.1	)	
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	 	—		 	—		 	(17.4	)	 	(17.4	)	
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	 	(0.1	)	 	1.2		 	—		 	1.1		
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	 	(0.1	)	 	1.2		 	(17.4	)	 	(16.3	)	
Balance at June 30, 2016	 	$	(0.2	)	 	$	(35.7	)	 	$	(87.5	)	 	$	(123.4	)	

																	
(in millions)	 	Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges	 	Pension & Postretirement	 	Foreign Currency Translation	 	Total	
Balance at December 31, 2014	 	$	(6.3	)	 	$	(95.0	)	 	$	(29.2	)	 	$	(130.5	)	
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	 	(6.9	)	 	—		 	(62.8	)	 	(69.7	)	
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	 	2.8		 	1.4		 	—		 	4.2		
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	 	(4.1	)	 	1.4		 	(62.8	)	 	(65.5	)	
Balance at March 31, 2015	 	(10.4	)	 	(93.6	)	 	(92.0	)	 	(196.0	)	
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	 	1.0		 	—		 	8.6		 	9.6		
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	 	3.3		 	1.4		 	—		 	4.7		
Net current period other comprehensive income	 	4.3		 	1.4		 	8.6		 	14.3		
Balance at June 30, 2015	 	$	(6.1	)	 	$	(92.2	)	 	$	(83.4	)	 	$	(181.7	)	

21

The following is a reconciliation of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 :

											
 	 	Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016	 	Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016	 	 	
(in millions)	 	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	 	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	 	Recognized Location	
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges	 	 	 	 	 	 	
  Commodity contracts	 	$	0.1		 	$	(1.0	)	 	Cost of sales	
  Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed	 	—		 	(4.3	)	 	Interest expense	
 	 	0.1		 	(5.3	)	 	Total before tax	
 	 	—		 	1.1		 	Tax benefit	
 	 	$	0.1		 	$	(4.2	)	 	Net of tax	
Amortization of pension and postretirement items	 	 	 	 	 	 	
  Actuarial losses	 	$	(1.2	)	 	$	(2.4	)	(a)	 	
 	 	(1.2	)	 	(2.4	)	 	Total before tax	
 	 	—		 	—		 	Tax benefit	
 	 	$	(1.2	)	 	$	(2.4	)	 	Net of tax	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total reclassifications for the period	 	$	(1.1	)	 	$	(6.6	)	 	Net of tax	
(a) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 17, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for further details).	

											
 	 	Three Months Ended
June 30, 2015	 	Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015	 	 	
(in millions)	 	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	 	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	 	Recognized Location	
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges	 	 	 	 	 	 	
  Foreign exchange contracts	 	$	(4.0	)	 	$	(7.2	)	 	Cost of sales	
  Commodity contracts	 	(0.7	)	 	(1.4	)	 	Cost of sales	
  Interest rate swap contracts: Float-to-fixed	 	(0.6	)	 	(1.2	)	 	Interest Expense	
 	 	(5.3	)	 	(9.8	)	 	Total before tax	
 	 	2.0		 	3.7		 	Tax benefit	
 	 	$	(3.3	)	 	$	(6.1	)	 	Net of tax	
Amortization of pension and postretirement items	 	 	 	 	 	 	
  Actuarial losses	 	$	(1.9	)	 	$	(3.8	)	(a)	 	
 	 	(1.9	)	 	(3.8	)	 	Total before tax	
 	 	0.5		 	1.0		 	Tax benefit	
 	 	$	(1.4	)	 	$	(2.8	)	 	Net of Tax	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total reclassifications for the period	 	$	(4.7	)	 	$	(8.9	)	 	Net of Tax	
(a) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 17, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for further details).	
14.  Stock-Based Compensation

22

The Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Omnibus Plan”) was approved by shareholders on May 7, 2013 and replaced several of the Company's incentive plans (collectively referred to as the "Prior Plans"). No new awards may be granted under the Prior Plans; however, outstanding awards under the Prior Plans will continue in force and effect until vested, exercised, forfeited or expired pursuant to their terms. The 2013 Omnibus Plan provides for both short-term and long-term incentive awards for employees and non-employee directors. Stock-based awards may take the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares or performance unit awards. The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock originally available for awards under the 2013 Omnibus Plan was 8.0 million shares, and the amount is subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and certain other transactions or events in the future. On March 20, 2016, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2013 Plan to reflect the effect of the Spin-Off in accordance with the 2013 Plan’s provisions governing such adjustments; as a result, a total of 28,184,595 shares were available for future awards under the 2013 Plan as of that date.
Performance shares are earned based on the extent to which performance goals are met over the applicable performance period.  The performance goals and the applicable performance period vary for each grant year. The performance goals for the performance shares granted in 2016 are based fifty percent ( 50% ) on total shareholder return relative to peers and fifty percent ( 50% ) on the weighted average return on invested capital (ROIC) over the three -year performance period. Shares granted in 2014 were modified as of the Spin-Off date such that payout will be at target with service through December 31, 2016 . Depending on the foregoing factors, the number of shares granted could range from zero to 1.6 million and zero to 0.1 million for the 2016 and 2014 performance share grants, respectively. Due to the Spin-Off, awards with performance conditions other than service were not granted in 2015 .
The Company granted options to acquire 1.8 million and 0.4 million shares of common stock to employees during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively.  In addition, the Company issued a total of 1.4 million restricted stock units ("RSUs") to employees and directors during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 0.4 million restricted stock units to employees and directors during the six months ended June 30, 2015 .  The RSUs granted to employees vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The RSUs granted to directors vest on the second anniversary of the grant date.
In April 2015, the Company issued a total of 0.4 million restricted stock awards ("RSAs") to employees as retention awards to provide additional incentive for the employees to continue in employment and contribute toward the successful completion of the Spin-Off. As of June 30, 2016 , 0.3 million RSAs remain outstanding. Under the retention agreements, each employee was granted RSAs that will vest on the second anniversary of the Spin-Off if the employee has been continuously employed with MTW, MFS or an affiliate through that second anniversary.
Stock-based compensation expense was $1.5 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively.  Stock-based compensation expense was $2.8 million and $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the stock-based awards' vesting period.
On March 4, 2016, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Company adjusted its outstanding equity awards in accordance with the terms of the employee matters agreement. For purposes of the vesting of these equity awards, continued employment or service with MTW or with MFS is treated as continued employment for purposes of these awards. Stock options, RSUs and RSAs granted for MTW common stock prior to March 4, 2016 were generally converted into the same number of MTW stock options (with an adjusted exercise price), RSUs and RSAs, as well as, an equal number of MFS stock options, RSUs and RSAs. The underlying performance conditions for the RSUs are consistent with MTW’s original performance targets and future measurement periods. As no incremental fair value was awarded as a result of the adjustments, the modifications did not result in significant incremental compensation expense.
15.  Contingencies and Significant Estimates
The Company believes that it has obtained and is in substantial compliance with those material environmental permits and approvals necessary to conduct its various businesses.  Based on the facts presently known, the Company does not expect environmental compliance costs to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
As of June 30, 2016 , various product-related lawsuits were pending.  To the extent permitted under applicable law, all of these are insured with self-insurance retention levels and/or coverage with outside insurers.  The Company’s self-insurance retention levels vary by business and have fluctuated over the last 10 years.  The high-end of the Company’s self-insurance retention level is a legacy product liability insurance program inherited in the Grove acquisition for cranes manufactured in the United States for occurrences from January 2000 through October 2002.  As of June 30, 2016 , the largest self-insured retention level for new occurrences currently maintained by the Company is $2.0 million per occurrence and applies to product liability claims for cranes manufactured in the United States.

23

Product liability reserves in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $22.1 million and $21.9 million , respectively; $5.3 million and $2.8 million , respectively, was reserved specifically for actual cases and $16.8 million and $19.1 million , respectively, for claims incurred but not reported, which were estimated using actuarial methods.  Based on the Company’s experience in defending product liability claims, management believes the current reserves are adequate for estimated case resolutions on aggregate self-insured claims and insured claims.  Any recoveries from insurance carriers are dependent upon the legal sufficiency of claims and solvency of insurance carriers.
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , the Company had reserved $45.9 million and $43.9 million , respectively, for warranty claims included in product warranties and other non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Certain of these warranty and other related claims involve matters in dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration or litigation.
It is reasonably possible that the estimates for environmental remediation, product liability and warranty costs may change in the near future based upon new information that may arise or matters that are beyond the scope of the Company’s historical experience.  Presently, there are no reliable methods to estimate the amount of any such potential changes.
The Company is involved in numerous lawsuits involving asbestos-related claims in which the Company is one of numerous defendants.  After taking into consideration legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, the current political environment with respect to asbestos-related claims, and the liabilities accrued with respect to such matters, in the opinion of management, ultimate resolution is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
The Company is also involved in various legal actions arising out of the normal course of business, which, taking into account the liabilities accrued and legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution, individually and in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
16. Guarantees
The Company periodically enters into transactions with customers that provide for residual value guarantees and buyback commitments.  These initial transactions are recorded as deferred revenue and are amortized to income on a straight-line basis over a period equal to that of the customer’s third party financing agreement.  The deferred revenue included in other current and non-current liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $34.5 million and $43.0 million , respectively.  The total amount of residual value guarantees and buyback commitments given by the Company and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $38.5 million and $42.9 million , respectively.  These amounts are not reduced for amounts the Company would recover from the repossession and subsequent resale of the units.  The residual value guarantees and buyback commitments expire at various times through 2018. 
During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , the Company sold $3.4 million and $0.9 million , respectively, of additional long-term notes receivable to third party financing companies. The Company guarantees the collection of some percentage (up to 100% ) of notes sold to the financing companies.  The Company has accounted for the sales of the notes as a financing of receivables.  The receivables remain on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of payments made, in other current and non-current assets, and the Company has recognized an obligation equal to the net outstanding balance of the notes in other current and non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The cash flow benefit of these transactions is reflected in financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , the customers paid $8.5 million and $10.2 million , respectively, on the notes to the third party financing companies.  As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , the outstanding balance of the notes receivable guaranteed by the Company was $19.3 million and $24.4 million , respectively.
See Note 2, “Discontinued Operations,” for discussion of debt guaranteed by the Company related to Manitowoc Dong Yue.
In the normal course of business, the Company provides its customers a warranty covering workmanship, and in some cases materials, on products manufactured by the Company.  The warranty generally provides that products will be free from defects for periods ranging from 12 to 60 months with certain equipment having longer-term warranties.  If a product fails to comply with the Company’s warranty, the Company may be obligated, at its expense, to correct any defect by repairing or replacing such defective products.  The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its warranty at the time product revenue is recognized.  These costs primarily include labor and materials, as necessary, associated with repair or replacement.  The primary factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units shipped and historical and anticipated warranty claims.  As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary.  Below is a table

24

summarizing the warranty activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 : 

									
(in millions)	 	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016	 	Year Ended
December 31, 2015	
Balance at beginning of period	 	$	43.9		 	$	50.2		
Accruals for warranties issued during the period	 	23.5		 	49.8		
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period	 	(21.9	)	 	(52.7	)	
Currency translation	 	0.4		 	(3.4	)	
Balance at end of period	 	$	45.9		 	$	43.9		
17. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides certain pension, health care and death benefits for eligible retirees and their dependents.  The pension benefits are funded, while the health care and death benefits are not funded but are paid as incurred.  Eligibility for coverage is based on meeting certain years of service and retirement qualifications.  These benefits may be subject to deductibles, co-payment provisions, and other limitations.  The Company has reserved the right to modify these benefits.
As part of the Spin-Off, and in accordance with the employee matters agreement referred to in Note 2, "Discontinued Operations," certain combined plans were split between MTW and MFS. Accordingly, the Company transferred to MFS pension obligations associated with its active, retired and other former employees for those impacted defined benefit pension plans. The allocation of plan assets was determined in accordance with applicable ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), Internal Revenue Service and other jurisdictional requirements.
The components of periodic benefit costs for three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 are as follows:

																									
 	 	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016	 	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Postretirement	 	 	 	 	 	Postretirement	
 	 	U.S.	 	Non-U.S.	 	Health and	 	U.S.	 	Non-U.S.	 	Health and	
 	 	Pension	 	Pension	 	Other	 	Pension	 	Pension	 	Other	
(in millions)	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	
Service cost - benefits earned during the period	 	$	—		 	$	0.4		 	$	—		 	$	—		 	$	0.9		 	$	0.1		
Interest cost of projected benefit obligations	 	1.7		 	0.6		 	0.4		 	3.9		 	2.2		 	0.9		
Expected return on plan assets	 	(1.4	)	 	(0.5	)	 	—		 	(3.2	)	 	(1.7	)	 	—		
Amortization of actuarial net loss	 	0.9		 	0.3		 	—		 	2.1		 	0.7		 	—		
Net periodic benefit costs	 	1.2		 	0.8		 	0.4		 	2.8		 	2.1		 	1.0		
Net periodic benefit costs associated with MFS	 	—		 	—		 	—		 	0.4		 	0.4		 	0.1		
Net periodic benefit costs included in continuing operations	 	$	1.2		 	$	0.8		 	$	0.4		 	$	2.4		 	$	1.7		 	$	0.9		

																									
 	 	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015	 	Six Months Ended June 30, 2015	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Postretirement	 	 	 	 	 	Postretirement	
 	 	U.S.	 	Non-U.S.	 	Health and	 	U.S.	 	Non-U.S.	 	Health and	
 	 	Pension	 	Pension	 	Other	 	Pension	 	Pension	 	Other	
(in millions)	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	 	Plans	
Service cost - benefits earned during the period	 	$	—		 	$	0.7		 	$	0.1		 	$	—		 	$	1.4		 	$	0.2		
Interest cost of projected benefit obligations	 	2.4		 	2.2		 	0.5		 	4.7		 	4.4		 	1.0		
Expected return on plan assets	 	(2.3	)	 	(1.9	)	 	—		 	(4.5	)	 	(3.8	)	 	—		
Amortization of actuarial net loss	 	1.3		 	0.6		 	—		 	2.6		 	1.2		 	—		
Net periodic benefit costs	 	1.4		 	1.6		 	0.6		 	2.8		 	3.2		 	1.2		
Net periodic benefit costs associated with MFS	 	0.1		 	0.5		 	—		 	0.2		 	1.1		 	—		
Net periodic benefit costs included in continuing operations	 	$	1.3		 	$	1.1		 	$	0.6		 	$	2.6		 	$	2.1		 	$	1.2		

25

18. Restructuring
The Company incurred $8.8 million and $13.2 million of restructuring expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively. These costs related primarily to employee termination benefits associated with workforce reductions in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. The workforce reductions are part of ongoing manufacturing and operations rationalization programs. The restructuring expense in the three months ended June 30, 2016 also included $2.3 million of expense related to the resignation of the former Chief Financial Officer.
The following is a roll-forward of all of the Company's restructuring activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 (in millions): 

																
 	Restructuring Reserve
Balance as of
December 31, 2015	 	Restructuring
Expenses	 	Use of Reserve	 	Restructuring Reserve
Balance as of
June 30, 2016	
Total	$	6.5		 	$	13.2		 	$	(8.4	)	 	$	11.3		

19. Recent Accounting Changes and Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Deferral of the Effective Date, which amends ASU No. 2014-09. As a result, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which amends ASU 2014-09. ASU No. 2016-08 provides additional guidance for revenue transactions that involve a third party in providing goods or services to a customer. The reporting entity must determine if the obligation to the customer is to provide the goods or services, i.e., as the principal, or to arrange for a third party to provide the goods or services, i.e., as the agent. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which amends ASU 2014-09. ASU No. 2016-10 clarifies that goods or services that are immaterial in the context of the contract are not required to be identified as separate performance obligations. In addition, the ASU provides an accounting policy election to treat shipping and handling activities as a fulfillment cost and not part of the revenue transaction. The ASU also provides guidance regarding licensing arrangements to determine whether the license grants the right to use functional or symbolic intellectual property. Revenue for licenses of functional intellectual property, such as software, is generally recognized at a point in time, while revenue for licenses of symbolic intellectual property, such as tradenames, is generally recognized over time. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amends ASU 2014-09. This ASU clarifies the requirement to assess collectability of contract consideration, clarifies the treatment of noncash consideration and provides a policy election to exclude from revenue amounts collected from customers for sales and similar taxes. The adoption will use one of two retrospective application methods. The Company is evaluating the potential effects of these ASUs on the consolidated financial statements.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11 - "Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (SEC Update)." This ASU discusses rescission of revenue and expense recognition for freight services, rescission of presentation of shipping and handling fees billed to a customer (classify as revenue only for those entities that record revenue based on gross amount billed to customer; classification of costs is an accounting policy decision, rescission of accounting by a customer for certain consideration received from a vendor (expense associated with a free product or service delivered at time of sale of another good or service should be classified as cost of sales) and rescission of accounting for gas-balancing arrangements. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 - "Compensation-Stock Compensation" (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting." This update is part of the Simplification Initiative, and its objective is to identify, evaluate and improve areas of GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. The update involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The effective date for this ASU is for annual periods beginning

26

after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06 - "Derivatives and Hedging: Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments." The amendments clarify the steps required to assess whether a call or put option meets the criteria for bifurcation as an embedded derivative. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 - "Leases", which is intended to improve financial reporting on leasing transactions. This standard requires a lessee to record on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by lease terms of more than 12 months. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 - "Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." ASU 2016-01 amends various aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure for financial instruments. Most significantly, ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of an investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income (loss). ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 - “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.” This update clarifies the guidance related to accounting for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability; see further discussion of ASU 2015-03 below. The guidance in ASU 2015-03 did not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early application permitted. The guidance will be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-1 - “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” This update changes the guidance on accounting for inventory accounted for on a first-in first-out (FIFO) basis. Under the revised standard, an entity should measure FIFO inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company believes the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05 - “Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” This update provides guidance on accounting for a software license in a cloud computing arrangement. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. Further, all software licenses are within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 350-40 and will be accounted for consistent with other licenses of intangible assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 - “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” To simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs, this update requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts, rather than as a deferred asset. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early application permitted. The guidance will be applied on a

27

retrospective basis. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02 - “Consolidation (Topic 820)—Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” This update amends the current consolidation guidance for both the variable interest entity (VIE) and voting interest entity (VOE) consolidation models. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01 - “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items.” This update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. ASU 2015-01 is effective for the first interim period within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company adopted this guidance as required beginning January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

28

20.  Subsequent Events

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect management’s evaluation of subsequent events through August 9, 2016, the date that the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the quarter-ended June 30, 2016 were issued.
On August 8, 2016 the Company announced its intent to relocate its crawler crane manufacturing operations located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin to Shady Grove Pennsylvania, effective in the third quarter 2017.  The program addresses the company’s strategic imperative of reducing its manufacturing capacity globally. The Company will involve local stakeholders, including relevant employee representatives, at the impacted location in compliance with local practices and requirements. The Company expects to incur cash charges related to severance costs and other employment related benefits in the range of $10 to $15 million , other costs in the range of $15 to $20 million and capital expenditures of $10 to $15 million .  Non-cash charges, primarily related to fixed assets and inventory related charges are expected to be in the range of $30 to $40 million .
With the announced intent to relocate its crawler crane manufacturing location in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, the Company has decided to no longer continue to implement its SAP ERP platform and will recognize a non-cash impairment charge associated with accumulated costs of approximately $75 to $80 million in the second half of 2016, including amounts specifically related to the SAP environment for the Manitowoc, Wisconsin manufacturing facility. 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
On March 4, 2016, the Company completed the spin-off of its former foodservice business (“MFS”) into an independent, public company (the “Spin-Off”). As a consequence, the Company’s former MFS operations are now being presented as discontinued operations. See Note 1, “Accounting Policies,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Analysis of Net Sales
Consolidated net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 decreased 4.2% to $457.7 million from $477.7 million for the same period in 2015 . Consolidated net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 increased 0.1% to $885.1 million from $884.4 million for the same period in 2015 . The decrease in net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 is primarily due to ongoing softness in the mobile cranes market driven largely by the underperformance in the U.S stemming from lower oil prices. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 , continued strength in tower crane sales as a result of improving residential and commercial construction trends in Europe, combined with new product introductions have offset the softness in the mobile crane business resulting in the slight improvement. Consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were favorably impacted by $1.4 million and unfavorably impacted by $2.2 million , respectively, from the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus foreign currencies.
As of June 30, 2016 , total backlog was $393.5 million , a 21.6% decrease from the March 31, 2016 backlog of $502.2 million , and a 46.2% decrease from the June 30, 2015 backlog of $731.0 million . 
Analysis of Operating Income
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $88.2 million , a decrease of $6.7 million compared to $94.9 million of consolidated gross profit for the same period in 2015 . Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $170.1 million , a decrease of $0.2 million compared to $170.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 . The decrease in gross profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was the primarily result of the decrease in net sales noted previously, which also resulted in less absorption of fixed manufacturing costs. The impact of lower sales volume was partially offset by actions taken over the last twelve months that are intended to right-size the business, including plant rationalizations, reductions in force and other operating efficiency initiatives.
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 , engineering, selling and administrative (“ES&A”) expenses decreased $6.1 million to $73.4 million versus $79.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 . ES&A expenses decrease d 10.1% to $145.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $162.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 . The decrease in ES&A expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods was due primarily to reduced headcount levels, lower stock-based compensation and pension and post-retirement expense and lower discretionary spending. Other expense of $0.4 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016  is comprised primarily of separation equity awards.

29

The Company's subtotal operating earnings, which represents gross profit less ES&A, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were favorably impacted by $0.1 million and and favorably impacted by $0.5 million , respectively, from the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus foreign currencies.
The Company is continuing its restructuring activities in conjunction with its growth plan. This resulted in $8.8 million of restructuring expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 related to workforce reductions in its North American and European facilities and the resignation of a former executive officer ( $2.3 million ) compared to $0.6 million of expense in the three months ended June 30, 2015 . The Company's efforts to balance capacity resulted in restructuring expense of $13.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $0.8 million of expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 .

Analysis of Non-Operating Income Statement Items
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $9.9 million versus $24.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 . Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $19.6 million versus $47.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 . The decrease was due to a lower average debt balance, partially offset by a higher average interest rate. Additionally, the remaining balance of $0.7 million as of March 3, 2016 in derivative liabilities related to the termination of fixed-to-float swaps that were previously treated as a decrease to the debt balance for the Prior 2022 Notes, and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap, was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016 .
There was no loss on debt extinguishment for the three months ended June 30, 2016 or the six months ended June 30, 2015 . The loss on debt extinguishment for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $76.3 million and consisted of:

•	$31.5 million related to the March 3, 2016 redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes, which included $24.6 million related to the redemption premium and $6.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing fees;	

•	$34.6 million on the redemption of the Prior 2022 Notes, comprised of $31.2 million related to the redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees;	

•	$5.9 million on the termination of the Prior Senior Credit Facility as a result of the write-off of deferred financing expenses; and	

•	a $4.3 million loss on the termination of interest rate swaps.	
Amortization expense for deferred financing fees was $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 . Amortization expense for deferred financing fees was $1.3 million of expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $2.1 million of expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 .
Other income (expense) for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $2.1 million of income compared to $2.8 million of income for the same period in 2015 and was comprised primarily of foreign currency translation. Other income (expense) for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $3.2 million of income compared to $2.6 million of income for the same period in 2015 and was comprised primarily of foreign currency translation.
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company recorded income tax expense of $0.7 million , compared to an income tax benefit of $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 . For the six months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company recorded income tax expense of $122.2 million , compared to an income tax benefit of $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 . The increase in the Company’s tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 relative to the prior year relates primarily to a one-time increase in the valuation allowance associated with the Company’s domestic federal and state deferred tax assets and attributes in connection with the Spin-Off. In addition to the non-cash charge related to the valuation allowance, the Company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates.
The Company's income (loss) from discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was a $0.8 million loss compared to income of $29.6 million for the same period in 2015 . The Company's income (loss) from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was a $4.0 million loss compared to income of $44.6 million for the same period in 2015 . Activity in earnings (loss) from discontinued operations relates primarily to the results of MFS through the separation date (March 4, 2016) and separation costs associated with the Spin-Off which are classified in discontinued operations.
Financial Condition

30

First Six Months of 2016
Cash and cash equivalents balance as of June 30, 2016 totaled $40.8 million , a decrease of $22.6 million from the December 31, 2015 balance of $63.4 million , which included $31.9 million in cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations.
Cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations for the first six months of 2016 were $162.6 million compared to cash flows used for continuing operations of $39.6 million for the first six months of 2015.  During the first six months of 2016 compared to the first six months of 2015, the increase in cash flows used for continuing operations was primarily due to a cash prepayment penalty of $56.6 million related to the redemption of the Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes. Additionally, there was an increase of $32.3 million and $48.3 million of cash used for the change in accounts receivable and accounts payable, respectively, due to lower sales and inventory purchase levels in the three months ended June 30, 2016, versus the comparative prior year period. This increase in cash use from accounts receivable and accounts payable was partially offset by a decrease of $52.6 million on the use of cash for inventory on lower sales driving lower inventory levels. Other than the prepayment penalty, the use of cash from operations in the first six months of 2016 is generally consistent with historical seasonal trends as the business uses cash to build working capital in anticipation of seasonal sales increases during summer months.
Cash flows used for investing activities of continuing operations of $23.5 million for the first six months of 2016 consisted of capital expenditures of $24.7 million , with the majority related to equipment purchases in North America and Europe, partially offset by proceeds from sales of property, plant, and equipment of $0.9 million and a change in restricted cash of $0.3 million .
Cash flows provided by financing activities of continuing operations of $228.4 million for the first six months of 2016 consisted primarily of net cash received as a dividend from MFS immediately prior to the Spin-Off and proceeds from the 2021 Notes. We used cash to repay our Prior Senior Credit Facility and the Prior 2020 Notes and 2022 Notes.
First Six Months of 2015
Cash and cash equivalents balance as of June 30, 2015 totaled $67.7 million , a decrease of $0.3 million from the December 31, 2014 balance of $68.0 million . The balances at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , included cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations of $14.8 million and $16.5 million , respectively.
Cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations for the first six months of 2015 were $39.6 million . During the first six months of 2015, cash flows used for continuing operations were primarily due to the seasonal increase in working capital in anticipation of seasonal sales increases during summer months.
Cash flows used for investing activities of continuing operations of $14.1 million for the first six months of 2015 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $22.5 million , with the majority of the capital expenditures related to equipment purchases and our enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system implementation, partially offset by proceeds from sales of property, plant, and equipment of $5.1 million and change in restricted cash of $3.3 million .
Cash flows provided by financing activities of continuing operations of $103.4 million for the first six months of 2015 consisted primarily of proceeds from the Company's prior revolving credit facility.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Outstanding debt as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is summarized as follows:

									
(in millions)	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
Term loan A	 	$	—		 	$	312.8		
Term loan B	 	—		 	119.5		
Senior notes due 2020	 	—		 	613.1		
Senior notes due 2022	 	—		 	299.2		
Senior notes due 2021	 	248.7		 	—		
Other	 	48.5		 	66.3		
Deferred financing costs	 	(5.0	)	 	(13.3	)	
Total debt	 	292.2		 	1,397.6		
Less current portion and short-term borrowings	 	(17.2	)	 	(67.2	)	
Long-term debt	 	$	275.0		 	$	1,330.4		

31

On March 3, 2016 , the Company entered into a $225.0 million Asset Based Revolving Credit Facility (as amended, the "ABL Revolving Credit Facility") with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as Joint Lead Arrangers. The ABL Revolving Credit Facility includes a $75.0 million Letter of Credit Facility, $10.0 million of which is available to the German borrower, with a term of 5 years.
The ABL Revolving Credit Facility replaced the $1,050.0 million Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Prior Senior Credit Facility”). The termination of the Prior Senior Credit Facility resulted in a loss of $5.9 million related to the write-off of deferred financing expenses and $4.3 million related to termination of interest rate swaps.
On February 18, 2016 , the Company entered into an indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trust and collateral agent, and completed the sale of $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due August 15, 2021 (the " 2021 Notes"). Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. The 2021 Notes were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act.
On March 3, 2016 , the Company redeemed its 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Prior 2020 Notes”) and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Prior 2022 Notes”) for $625.5 million and $330.5 million , or 104.250% and 110.167% as expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, respectively.
The redemption of the Prior 2020 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $31.5 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $24.6 million related to redemption premium and $6.9 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously monetized derivative assets related to fixed-to-float interest rate swaps were treated as an increase to the debt balance of the Prior 2020 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining monetization balance of $11.8 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as a reduction to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016 .
The redemption of the Prior 2022 Notes resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $34.6 million during the first quarter of 2016 and consisted of $31.2 million related to redemption premium and $3.4 million related to write-off of deferred financing fees. Previously, derivative liabilities related to termination of fixed-to-float swaps were treated as a decrease to the debt balance of the Prior 2022 Notes and were being amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. As a result of the redemption, the remaining balance of $0.7 million as of March 3, 2016 was amortized as an increase to interest expense during the first quarter of 2016 .
Outstanding balances under the Company's Prior Senior Credit Facility and Prior 2020 and 2022 Notes were repaid with proceeds from the 2021 Notes and a cash dividend from MFS in conjunction with the Spin-Off.
As of June 30, 2016 , the Company had outstanding $48.5 million of other indebtedness that has a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 5.26% . This debt includes outstanding line of credit balances and capital lease obligations in its Americas, Asia-Pacific and European regions.
The revolving facility under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility has a maximum borrowing capacity of $225.0 million and expires in March of  2021 . During the quarter ended June 30, 2016 , the Company did not borrow against the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. The interest rate of the ABL Revolving Credit Facility fluctuates based on excess availability.  Had the Company borrowed as of June 30, 2016 , the spreads for LIBOR and Prime borrowings were 1.50% and 0.50% , respectively, with excess availability of approximately $173.4 million .
As of June 30, 2016 , the Company had no interest rate swaps outstanding related to its 2021 Notes.
The balance sheet values of the Senior Notes as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are not equal to the face value of the Senior Notes because of gains (losses) of previously terminated fixed-to-float interest rate hedges and original issue discounts included in the applicable balance sheet values (see Note 5, "Derivative Financial Instruments," of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
As of June 30, 2016 , the Company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants in its debt instruments inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the ABL Revolving Credit Facility and the 2021 Notes.  Based upon the Company's current plans and outlook, management believes the Company will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent twelve months.
See additional discussion of the credit facilities and Senior Notes in Note 9, “Debt,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and excluding certain adjustments provided for in its ABL Revolving Credit Facility and listed below. The

32

Company’s trailing twelve-month Adjusted EBITDA as of June 30, 2016 was $111.8 million . The Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful to the reader in order to understand the basis for the Company's debt covenant calculations. The reconciliation of net loss attributable to the Company to Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2016 was as follows: 

				
 	Trailing Twelve
Months,	
(in millions)	June 30, 2016	
Net loss	$	(163.8	)	
Income from discontinued operations	(86.7	)	
Depreciation and amortization	62.5		
Interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees	71.3		
Costs due to early extinguishment of debt	76.5		
Restructuring expense	22.4		
Income taxes	90.5		
Pension and post-retirement	13.7		
Stock-based compensation	7.9		
Asset impairment	15.3		
Other	2.2		
Adjusted EBITDA	$	111.8		
The Company maintains an accounts receivable securitization program with a commitment size of $75.0 million , whereby transactions under the program are accounted for as sales in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.”  Sales of trade receivables under the program are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds received, including collections on the deferred purchase price notes, are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  See Note 10, “Accounts Receivable Securitization,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the program.
The Company’s liquidity position at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is summarized as follows:

									
(in millions)	 	June 30, 2016	 	December 31, 2015	
Cash and cash equivalents	 	$	40.8		 	$	31.5		
Revolver borrowing capacity	 	197.7		 	500.0		
Less: Borrowings on revolver	 	—		 	—		
Less: Short-term borrowings	 	(17.2	)	 	(67.2	)	
Less: Outstanding letters of credit	 	(24.3	)	 	(5.7	)	
Total liquidity	 	$	197.0		 	$	458.6		
The Company believes its liquidity and expected cash flows from operations should be sufficient to meet expected working capital, capital expenditure and other general ongoing operational needs.
The Company has not provided for additional U.S. income taxes on approximately $490.1 million of undistributed earnings of consolidated non-U.S. subsidiaries included in stockholders’ equity. Such earnings could become taxable upon sale or liquidation of these non-U.S. subsidiaries or upon dividend repatriation of cash balances. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of the unrecognized tax liability on such earnings. At June 30, 2016 , approximately $24.0 million of the Company’s total cash and cash equivalents were held by its foreign subsidiaries. This cash is associated with earnings that the Company has asserted are permanently reinvested. The Company has no current plans to repatriate cash or cash equivalents held by its foreign subsidiaries because it plans to reinvest such cash and cash equivalents to support its operations and continued growth plans outside the U.S. through the funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions, research, operating expenses or other similar cash needs of these operations. Further, although the Company has not generated cash from operations in the current period, the Company does not currently forecast a need for these funds in the U.S. because its future U.S. operations and debt service will be supported by the cash generated by its U.S. operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies have not materially changed since the 2015 Form 10-K was filed.

33

Cautionary Statements about Forward-Looking Information
Statements in this report and in other company communications that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, which are based upon our current expectations, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what appears within this quarterly report.
Forward-looking statements include descriptions of plans and objectives for future operations, and the assumptions behind those plans. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “targets” and “expects,” or similar expressions, usually identify forward-looking statements. Any and all projections of future performance are forward-looking statements.
In addition to the assumptions, uncertainties, and other information referred to specifically in the forward-looking statements, a number of factors could cause actual results to be significantly different from what is presented in this quarterly report. Those factors include, without limitation, the following:
Cyclicality of the construction industry; the effects of government spending on construction-related projects throughout the world; unanticipated changes in global demand for high-capacity lifting equipment; changes in demand for lifting equipment in emerging economies; the replacement cycle of technologically obsolete cranes; crude oil prices; and demand for used equipment.
Corporate - possible negative effects on the Company’s business operations, assets, or financial results as a result of the Spin-Off; changes in laws and regulations, as well as their enforcement, throughout the world; the ability to complete and appropriately integrate, and/or transition, restructure and consolidate acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances, joint ventures and other strategic alternatives; in connection with acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances and joint ventures, the finalization of the price and other terms, the realization of contingencies consistent with any established reserves, and unanticipated issues associated with transitional services; realization of anticipated earnings enhancements, cost savings, strategic options and other synergies, and the anticipated timing to realize those savings, synergies, and options; the successful development of innovative products and market acceptance of new and innovative products; the ability to focus and capitalize on product quality and reliability; issues relating to the ability to timely and efficiently execute on manufacturing strategies, including issues relating to new plant start-ups, plant closings, and/or consolidations of existing facilities and operations; efficiencies and capacity utilization of facilities; actions of competitors, including competitive pricing; availability of certain raw materials; changes in raw materials and commodity prices; unexpected issues associated with the quality of materials and components sourced from third parties and resolution of those issues; matters impacting the successful and timely implementation of ERP systems; changes in domestic and international economic and industry conditions, including steel industry conditions and the price of oil; changes in the markets we serve; unexpected issues associated with the availability of local suppliers and skilled labor; changes in the interest rate environment; unanticipated changes in capital and financial markets; risks associated with growth; foreign currency fluctuations and their impact on reported results and hedges in place; world-wide political risk; geographic factors and economic risks (including those related to the U.K.'s decision to exit the European Union); pressure of financing leverage; unanticipated changes in revenue, margins, costs and capital expenditures; work stoppages, labor negotiations, rates and temporary labor; issues associated with workforce reductions and subsequent ramp-up; growth of general and administrative expenses, including health care and post-retirement costs (resulting from, among other matters, U.S. health care legislation and reforms); unanticipated changes in consumer spending; the ability of our customers to obtain financing; the state of financial and credit markets; the ability to generate cash and manage working capital consistent with our stated goals; non-compliance with debt covenants; unexpected issues affecting the effective tax rate for the year; unanticipated issues associated with the resolution or settlement of uncertain tax positions; unfavorable resolution of tax audits; unanticipated changes in customer demand; the ability to increase operational efficiencies and capitalize on those efficiencies; the ability to capitalize on key strategic opportunities; actions of activist shareholders; risks associated with data security and technological systems and protections; natural disasters disrupting commerce in one or more regions of the world; acts of terrorism; government approval and funding of projects; and other events outside our control.
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The Company’s market risk disclosures have not materially changed since the 2015 Form 10-K was filed.  The Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2015 .
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures:   The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:   Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). During the period covered by this report, we made no changes that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company’s risk factors disclosures have not materially changed since the 2015 Form 10-K was filed, except those risks related to the Spin-Off not occurring and those specifically related to our former foodservice business are no longer applicable. The Company’s risk factors are incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Item 6.  Exhibits
(a)   Exhibits:  See exhibit index following the signature page of this Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

35

SIGNATURES  
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		
Date: August 9, 2016	The Manitowoc Company, Inc.	
 	(Registrant)	

 	/s/ Barry L. Pennypacker	
 	Barry L. Pennypacker	
 	President and Chief Executive Officer	
 	 	
 	/s/ David J. Antoniuk	
 	David J. Antoniuk	
 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	

36

THE MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
TO FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
June 30, 2016

	
							
Exhibit No.	 	Description	 	Filed/Furnished
Herewith	 	
 		 	 	 	 	 	
10.1		 	Offer Letter, accepted as of April 27, 2016, by and between David J. Antoniuk and The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 27, 2016).	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
10.2		 	Severance Agreement and Release, dated June 30, 2016, by and between The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and Carl J. Laurino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2016).	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
31		 	Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certifications	 	X	(1)	
 		 	 	 	 	 	
32.1		 	Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350	 	X	(2)	
 		 	 	 	 	 	
32.2		 	Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350	 	X	(2)	
 		 	 	 	 	 	
101		 	The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related notes.	 	X	(1)	
 
(1)  Filed Herewith
(2)  Furnished Herewith

37

Exhibit 31  
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 
I, Barry Pennypacker, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Manitowoc Company, Inc.;	

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;	

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	

(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):	

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and	

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: August 9, 2016

		
 	/s/ Barry L. Pennypacker	
 	Barry L. Pennypacker	
 	President and Chief Executive Officer	

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, David J. Antoniuk, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Manitowoc Company, Inc.;	

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;	

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	

(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):	

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and	

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  	
Date: August 9, 2016

		
 	/s/ David J. Antoniuk	
 	David J. Antoniuk	
 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	

Exhibit 32.1
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  
In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (the “company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry L. Pennypacker, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and	

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company as of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report.	

		
/s/ Barry L. Pennypacker	 	
Barry L. Pennypacker	 	
President and Chief Executive Officer	 	
August 9, 2016	 	
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and will be retained by The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 32.2
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  
In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (the “company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Antoniuk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and	

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company as of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report.	

		
/s/ David J. Antoniuk	 	
David J. Antoniuk	 	
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 	
August 9, 2016	 	
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and will be retained by The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.