The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries (CACI or the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for the Company, including its subsidiaries and ventures that are more than 50 percent owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and amounts included in other current assets and current liabilities that meet the definition of a financial instrument approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts. The fair value of the Company’s debt outstanding as of September 30, 2014 under its bank credit facility approximates its carrying value. The fair value of the Company’s debt under its bank credit facility was estimated using Level 2 inputs based on market data of companies with a corporate rating similar to CACI’s that have recently priced credit facilities. See Notes 4 and 10.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications (all of which are of a normal, recurring nature) that are necessary for the fair presentation of the periods presented. It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the full fiscal year.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP.

The standard is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which the Company will adopt the standard in FY2018.

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

Intangible assets are primarily amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from one to fifteen years. The weighted-average period of amortization for all customer contracts and related customer relationships as of September 30, 2014 is 13.1 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 11.3 years. The weighted-average period of amortization for acquired technologies as of September 30, 2014 is 9.6 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 4.9 years.

Expected amortization expense for the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, and for each of the fiscal years thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

Bank Credit Facility

The Company has a $1,681.3 million credit facility (the Credit Facility), which consists of an $850.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and an $831.3 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Facility has subfacilities of $50.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $400.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times senior secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals. The Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital expenses and capital expenditures.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $850.0 million. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had $415.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. The Company pays a quarterly facility fee for the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $10.4 million through December 31, 2016 and $20.8 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on November 15, 2018. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had $800.1 million outstanding under the Term Loan.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at the Company’s option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable rate based upon the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2014, the effective interest rate, including the impact of the Company’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements and excluding the effect of amortization of debt financing costs, for the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 2.67 percent.

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting the Company’s ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of the Company’s assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

The Company has capitalized $18.1 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Facility. All debt issuance costs are being amortized from the date incurred to the expiration date of the Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2014, $4.9 million of the unamortized balance is included in long-term debt and $5.8 million is included in other long-term assets.

Convertible Notes Payable

Effective May 16, 2007, the Company issued at par value $300.0 million convertible notes (the Convertible Notes) which matured on May 1, 2014. Upon maturity, the aggregate conversion value was $406.8 million. Accordingly, the Company paid note holders the outstanding principal value totaling $300.0 million in cash and issued approximately 1.4 million shares of our common stock for the remaining aggregate conversion value. Concurrently with the issuance of our common stock upon conversion, the Company received 1.4 million shares of our common stock pursuant to the terms of the call option hedge transaction described below. The Company included these shares within treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheet.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes in May 2007, we entered into separate call option hedge and warrant transactions to reduce the potential dilutive impact upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes. The Call Options and the Warrants (each as defined below) are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind CACI and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.

Call Options and Warrants

The Company purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of its common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of $54.65 per share. The cost of the Call Options was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. The Call Options allowed CACI to receive shares of its common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that CACI would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion. The Company exercised the call options upon the maturity and conversion of the Convertible Notes and received 1.4 million shares of our common stock.

In addition, the Company sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at a strike price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million and were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The Warrants settle daily over 90 trading days starting in August 2014 and ending in December 2014. We issue shares upon settlement of the Warrants. Since the price of our common stock exceeded the strike price on certain days during the trading settlement period, we issued 81,619 shares during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments as part of a strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. The Company has entered into several floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $600.0 million which hedge a portion of the Company’s floating rate indebtedness. The swaps mature at various dates through 2020. The Company has designated the swaps as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains are recognized as assets while unrealized losses are recognized as liabilities. The interest rate swap agreements are highly correlated to the changes in interest rates to which the Company is exposed. Unrealized gains and losses on these swaps are designated as effective or ineffective. The effective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, while the ineffective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of interest expense. Realized gains and losses in connection with each required interest payment are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to interest expense. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The effect of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows (in thousands):

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any liability or loss associated with such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and liquidity.

Government Contracting

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee and time-and-materials contracts are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). The DCAA has completed its audits of the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 and on April 3, 2014 the Defense Contract Management Agency issued final determinations regarding those incurred cost submissions, with a final determination on penalties and interest associated with the Company’s incurred cost submission for the year ending June 30, 2006 subsequently issued on May 21, 2014. The Company has appealed all of these determinations. The DCAA is currently in the process of auditing the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the year ended June 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010. Two of the Company’s task orders associated with work performed in Afghanistan are also currently under audit by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. In the opinion of management, adjustments that may result from these audits and the audits not yet started are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company has accrued its best estimate of potential disallowances. Additionally, the DCAA continually reviews the cost accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company. In the course of those reviews, cost accounting and other issues are identified, discussed and settled.

On March 26, 2012, the Company received a subpoena from the Defense Criminal Investigative Service seeking documents related to one of the Company’s contracts for the period of January 1, 2007 through March 26, 2012. The Company is providing documents responsive to the subpoena and cooperating fully with the government’s investigation. The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of zero to $1.8 million.

On April 9, 2012, the Company received a letter from the Department of Justice (DoJ) informing the Company that the DoJ is investigating whether the Company violated the civil False Claims Act by submitting false claims to receive federal funds pursuant to a GSA contract. Specifically, the DoJ is investigating whether the Company failed to comply with contract requirements and applicable regulations by improperly billing for certain contracting personnel under the contract. The Company has not accrued any liability as based on its present knowledge of the facts, it does not believe an unfavorable outcome is probable.

German Value-Added Taxes

The Company is under audit by the German tax authorities for issues related to value-added tax returns. At this time, the Company has not been assessed any deficiency and, based on sound factual and legal precedent, believes it is in compliance with the applicable value-added tax regulations. The Company has not accrued any liability for this matter because an unfavorable outcome is not considered probable. The Company estimates reasonable possible losses to be not greater than $3.0 million.

Virginia Sales and Use Tax Audit

The Company is under audit for sales and use tax related issues by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of $2.8 million to $4.8 million.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized, together with the income tax benefits recognized, is as follows (in thousands):

Under the terms of its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), the Company may issue, among others, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, SSARs, and performance awards, collectively referred to herein as equity instruments. During the periods presented all equity instrument grants were made in the form of RSUs. Other than performance-based RSUs which contain a market-based element, the fair value of RSU grants was determined based on the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs with market-based vesting features was also measured on the grant date, but was done so using a binomial lattice model.

In September 2013, the Company made its annual grant to key employees consisting of 202,170 Performance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs). The final number of such PRSUs that were earned by participants and vest was based on the achievement of a specified net after tax profit (NATP) for the year ended June 30, 2014 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day period ending September 13, 2014 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 13, 2013. The specified NATP for the year ended June 30, 2014 was met and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 13, 2014 exceeded the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 13, 2013 resulting in an additional 11,933 RSUs earned by participants.

Annual grants under the 2006 Plan are generally made to the Company’s key employees during the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year and to members of the Company’s Board of Directors during the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. With the approval of its Chief Executive Officer, the Company also issues equity instruments to strategic new hires and to employees who have demonstrated superior performance. In September 2014, the Company made its annual grant to its key employees consisting of 180,570 Performance Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs). The final number of such performance-based RSUs which will be considered earned by the participants and eventually vest is based on the achievement of a specified earnings per share (EPS) for the year ending June 30, 2015 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day period ending September 23, 2015, 2016 and 2017 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 23, 2014. No PRSUs will be earned if the specified EPS for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015 is not met. If EPS for the year ending June 30, 2015 exceeds the specified EPS and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 23, 2015, 2016 and 2017 exceeds the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 23, 2014 by 100 percent or more, then an additional 180,570 RSUs could be earned by participants. This is the maximum number of additional RSUs that can be earned related to the September 2014 annual grant. In addition to the performance and market conditions, there is a service vesting condition which stipulates that 50 percent of the earned award will vest on September 23, 2017 and 50 percent of the earned award will vest on September 1, 2018, in both cases dependent upon continuing service by the grantee as an employee of the Company, unless the grantee is eligible for earlier vesting upon retirement or certain other events.

The total number of shares authorized by shareholders for grants under the 2006 Plan and its predecessor plan is 12,450,000 as of September 30, 2014. The aggregate number of grants that may be made may exceed this approved amount as forfeited SSARs, stock options, restricted stock and RSUs, and vested but unexercised SSARs and stock options that expire, become available for future grants. As of September 30, 2014, cumulative grants of 13,449,045 equity instruments underlying the shares authorized have been awarded, and 4,117,531 of these instruments have been forfeited.

Activity related to SSARs/non-qualified stock options and RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2014 is as follows:

As of September 30, 2014, there was $35.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs scheduled to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.

ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260), requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock but not securities that are anti-dilutive, including stock options and SSARs with an exercise price greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Using the treasury stock method, diluted earnings per share include the incremental effect of SSARs, stock options, restricted shares, and those RSUs that are no longer subject to a market or performance condition. There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. The PRSUs granted in September 2014 are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the underlying shares are considered to be contingently issuable shares. These shares will be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share beginning in the first reporting period in which the performance metric is achieved. The shares underlying the Convertible Notes were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2013 because the average share price was above the conversion price during the three month period. The Warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share during the three months ended September 30, 2013 because the Warrants’ strike price of $68.31 was greater than the average market price of a share of Company common stock during that period. The Warrants were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share during the three months ended September 30, 2014 because the strike price was lower than the average market price of a share of the Company stock during the period. The chart below shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax statutes and regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and require the application of significant judgment. The Company is currently under examination by one state jurisdiction and one foreign jurisdiction for years ended June 30, 2004 through June 30, 2012. The Company does not expect the resolution of these examinations to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

The Company’s total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 was $9.5 million and $9.6 million, respectively. Of the $9.5 million unrecognized tax benefit at September 30, 2014, $2.4 million, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.

The Company reports operating results and financial data in two segments: domestic operations and international operations. Domestic operations provide information solutions and services to its customers. Its customers are primarily U.S. federal government agencies. Other customers of the Company’s domestic operations include state and local governments and commercial enterprises. The Company places employees in locations around the world in support of its clients. International operations offer services to both commercial and non-U.S. government customers primarily within the Company’s business systems and enterprise IT markets. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net income attributable to CACI. Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction. The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market. When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid. Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available. When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels, as follows:

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value included interest rate swap agreements. The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.