Exhibit 99-a December 19, 1994

CACI International Inc Announces Court Approval of Settlement of Shareholder Suits Filed in Early 1991

Arlington, VA - CACI International Inc (NASDAQ: CACI) announced today that both the Delaware Chancery Court and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia have accepted the proposed settlement of two shareholder lawsuits originally filed in Delaware and the District of Columbia in early 1991 on the terms previously announced.

By orders dated November 15, 1994 and December 1, 1994, respectively, the Delaware Chancery Court and the Federal District Court decreed that all issues of the litigations have been resolved by the settlement and ordered that the cases be dismissed. In the quarter ended September 30, 1993, the Company reported a $300,000 extraordinary charge against earnings that will cover the cost of the settlement.

CACI Chairman and CEO, Jack London, said, "We are pleased to have reached a final settlement of these matters. While the settlement does not acknowledge any wrongdoing on the part of the Board of Directors on any aspect of the suits, the Board believes that the settlement will allow the Company to concentrate its efforts on building the Company going forward."

CACI is an international information technology products and services corporation. The company specializes in developing and integrating systems, software, and simulation products in support of government agencies and commercial enterprises worldwide.

For further information, contact:

Samuel R. Strickland               Douglas Poretz
CACI International Inc             Poretz Ltd.
(703) 841-7800                     (703) 506-1778

                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                          IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

- - - --------------------------------------------
JOHN CHRYSOGELOS, on Behalf of Himself      )
and All Others Similarly Situated,          )
                                            )
                Plaintiff,                  )
                                            )
     - against -                            )
                                            )
J.P. LONDON, JOHN DeNIGRIS, THOMAS H.       )
MOORER, JOHN H. BAKER, PAUL J. COLEMAN,     )  Civil Action No. 11910
J.H. BERKSON, and WARREN R. PHILLIPS        )
                                            )
                Defendants,                 )
                                            )
     - and -                                )
                                            )
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC., a                  )
Delaware Corporation,                       )
                                            )
                Nominal Defendant.          )
- - - --------------------------------------------

A hearing having been held before this Court of November 15, 1994, pursuant to this Court's Order of August 16, 1994, 1994 (the "Scheduling Order"), upon a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise and Settlement, dated July 1994 (the "Stipulation"), of the above-captioned action (the "Action"), which is incorporated herein by reference; it appearing that due notice of said hearing has been given in accordance with the aforesaid Scheduling Order; the respective parties having appeared by their attorneys of record; the Court having heard and considered evidence in support of the proposed Settlement; the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard; an opportunity to be heard having been given to all other persons requesting to be heard in accordance with the Scheduling Order; the Court having determined that notice to the Class Members and Shareholders pursuant to the aforesaid Scheduling Order was adequate and sufficient; and the entire matter having been heard and considered by the Court;

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED this 15th day of November, 1994, that:

1. Notice to the Class pursuant to Chancery Rule 23(d) and notice to CACI shareholders pursuant to Chancery Rule 23.1, has been given in an adequate and sufficient manner, constituting the best notice practicable, complying in all respects with such Rules and due process, including, but not limited to, the forms of notice and the methods of identifying and giving notice.

2. Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1) and (2) and 23.1:
(a) the Court finds that (i) the Class, as defined below is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (ii) there are questions of law and fact common to the Class, (iii) the claims of the plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Class, and (iv) the plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class;
(b) the action is hereby certified as a class action on behalf of all persons who owned CACI Class A common stock at any time during the period on and from April 26, 1990, through and including December 1, 1990, in each case excluding CACI, the Individual Defendants, the officers and directors of CACI during any period of fiscal year 1990 or any portion thereof, members of their immediate families, subsidiaries or other corporations under common control, successors and assigns (the "Class" and each member of the Class A "Class Member");
(c) plaintiffs are hereby certified as Class representatives and their respective counsel are certified as Class Counsel; and
(d) the Court finds that plaintiffs, with their respective counsel, will fairly and adequately enforce the derivative claims brought on behalf of CACI; and
(e) the Court finds that the requirements of Court of Chancery Rules 23(b)(1) and (2) and 23.1 have been satisfied.

3. The proposed Settlement is approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the shareholders of CACI and the Class, and shall be consummated in accordance with its terms and conditions.

4. This Action is dismissed with prejudice and on the merits and without award of court costs, and all Released Claims, as defined in the Stipulation, hereby are extinguished.

5. Plaintiffs and each and every shareholder and Class Member are permanently barred and enjoined from asserting directly, individually, derivatively or in any other capacity against Defendants or any of them (or any of the other Released Parties mentioned in the Stipulation) any and all of the Released Claims or any claim, right, demand or cause of action which could have been asserted based upon a Released Claim.

6. Neither this Final Judgment nor the Stipulation is an admission or concession by any of the Defendants of any actual or potential fault, omission, liability or wrongdoing. This Judgment is not a finding of the validity or invalidity of any claims in the actions or of any wrongdoing by any of the Defendants. Neither this Judgment nor the Stipulation or the fact of settlement, nor settlement proceedings, nor the settlement negotiations, nor any related document shall be used as an admission of any actual or potential fault or omission by any person or be offered or received in evidence as an admission, concession, presumption or inference against any party in any proceeding other than such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce the Stipulation of Settlement.

7. Plaintiff's counsel are awarded the sum of $550,000 as legal fees and $48,000 as reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses. Such sums shall be allocated by Plaintiffs' counsel among those Plaintiffs' counsel who have contributed to the settlement in such proportion as Plaintiffs' counsel determine is fair and equitable.

8. Without affecting the finality of this Final Order and Judgment in any way, this Court reserves jurisdiction over all matters relating to the administration and consummation of this settlement.

    /s/
-----------------------------------

Vice Chancellor

                                                                 EXHIBIT 99-c

                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

- - - --------------------------------------------
LARRY L. PFIRMAN, on behalf of Himself      )             FILED
and All Others Similarly Situated,          )           DEC 1 1994
                                            )
                Plaintiff,                  )      CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
                                            )        DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
     - against -                            )
                                            )
J.P. LONDON, JOHN DeNIGRIS, THOMAS H.       )
MOORER, JOHN H. BAKER, PAUL J. COLEMAN,     )  Civil Action No.
J.H. BERKSON, and WARREN R. PHILLIPS, and   )      90-3119
CACI INTERNATIONAL, INC.                    )
                                            )
                Defendants,                 )  (Hon. Thomas Penfield
                                            )  Jackson)
     - and -                                )
                                            )
CACI INTERNATIONAL, INC., a                 )
Delaware Corporation,                       )
                                            )
                Nominal Defendant.          )
- - - --------------------------------------------

             /s/
----------------------------
THOMAS PENFIELD JACKSON
United States District Judge

Washington, DC 20036