ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC., DEF 14A filed on 3/30/2026
Proxy Statement (definitive)
v3.26.1
Document and Entity Information
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]  
Document Type DEF 14A
Entity Registrant Name ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
Entity Central Index Key 0000007536
Amendment Flag false
v3.26.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
$ / shares
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table

Average

Average

Summary

Summary

Summary

Summary

Compensation

Compensation

Compensation

Compensation

Compensation

Compensation

Compensation

Compensation

Actually

Table Total for

Table Total for

Table Total for

Actually Paid

Actually Paid

Actually Paid

Table Total 

 Paid to 

First

Second

Third

to First

to Second

to Third

for Non-PEO

Non-PEO

Year1 (a)

  ​

PEO2 (b)

  ​

PEO2 (c)

  ​

PEO2 (d)

  ​

PEO3 (e)

  ​

PEO3 (f)

  ​

PEO3 (g)

  ​

NEOs2 (h)

  ​

 NEOs3 (i)

2025

$4,347,295

$9,264,540

n/a

$3,830,368

(4,443,659)

n/a

$4,560,324

$4,212,341

2024

n/a

$8,229,294

n/a

n/a

$6,233,382

n/a

$2,895,533

$2,176,724

2023

n/a

$8,891,814

n/a

n/a

$8,801,499

n/a

$3,224,995

$3,983,576

2022

n/a

$7,478,225

$11,550,022

n/a

$8,049,694

$6,516,685

$2,734,955

$2,070,990

2021

n/a

n/a

$12,880,838

n/a

n/a

$24,843,768

$3,902,722

$6,736,978

Value of Initial Fixed

$100 Investment Based 

On:

Peer

Arrow's

Group

Total

Total

Net

Shareholder

Shareholder

Income

Absolute

Year1 (a)

  ​

Return4 (j)

  ​

Return5 (k)

  ​

(in millions)6 (l)

  ​

EPS7 (m)

2025

$113

$249

$ 571

$10.33

2024

$116

$200

$ 392

$10.83

2023

$126

$170

$ 904

$17.06

2022

$107

$132

$1,427

$23.13

2021

$138

$147

$1,108

$15.60

(1)

NEOs included in these columns reflect the following:

Year

  ​ ​ ​

PEOs

  ​ ​ ​

Non-PEO NEOs

2025

William F. Austen (PEO 1)
Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Eric C. Nowak, Richard J. Marano, Gretchen K. Zech

2024

Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Eric C. Nowak, Gretchen K. Zech, Richard J. Marano, Kristin D. Russell

2023

Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Gretchen K. Zech, Kristin D. Russell, Carine L. Jean-Claude, Michael J. Long, Kirk D. Schell

2022

Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)
Michael J. Long (PEO 3)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Kirk D. Schell, Gretchen K. Zech, Vincent P. Melvin, Richard A. Seidlitz, Christopher D. Stansbury

2021

Michael J. Long (PEO 3)

Sean J. Kerins, Christopher D. Stansbury, Gretchen K. Zech, Vincent P. Melvin

(2)

Amounts reflect the “Summary Compensation Table” for our NEOs as disclosed for the applicable reporting year.

(3)

The following table shows the adjustment to the total compensation reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable reporting year for our PEOs, as well as the average for our other NEOs, to determine “compensation actually paid,” as computed in accordance with the Rules. Because “compensation actually paid,” as calculated per the Rules, requires the inclusion of equity awards as compensation prior to vesting of the awards, the amounts reported below do not reflect the actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year, with a significant portion of the “compensation actually paid” subject to forfeiture if the underlying vesting conditions are not achieved.

2025

Non-PEO

PEO 1

PEO 2

NEO Average

Total Compensation from the Summary Compensation Table

  ​ ​ ​

$

4,347,295

  ​ ​ ​

$

9,264,540

  ​ ​ ​

$

4,560,324

Adjustments for Pension

Adjustment Summary Compensation Table Pension (a)

$

$

(850,350)

$

(323,175)

Amount added for Current Year Service Cost (b)

$

$

788,693

$

210,780

Amount added for Prior Year Service Cost Impacting Current Year (b)

$

$

$

Total Adjustments for Pension

$

$

(61,657)

$

(112,395)

Adjustments for Equity Grants

Adjustment for grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table(c)

$

(3,795,113)

$

(7,380,290)

$

(2,725,054)

Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year(d)

$

3,278,186

$

$

2,798,731

Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years(d)

$

$

$

(318,497)

Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in the current year (d)

$

$

$

Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years(d)

$

$

(81,425)

$

9,232

Forfeitures during the current year equal to the prior year-end fair value(d)

$

$

(6,565,032)

$

Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in total compensation

$

$

$

Changes in fair value to reflect excess fair value resulting from modifications to stock option and stock awards(e)

$

$

380,206

$

Total Adjustments for Equity Awards

$

(516,927)

$

(13,646,542)

$

(235,588)

Compensation Actually Paid

$

3,830,368

$

(4,443,659)

$

4,212,341

(a)

The amounts reflect the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable year.

(b)

The amounts represent the sum of the actuarial present value of the benefits under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans attributable to services rendered during the indicated fiscal year and any plan modifications during the applicable year, calculated using the same methodology as used in Arrow’s financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles.

(c)

The amounts reflect the aggregate grant-date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable year.

(d)

In accordance with the Rules, the fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were remeasured starting on December 31, 2019, and subsequently as of each vesting date and as of the end of each fiscal year while the award remains unvested, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, risk-free interest rates, and probability of achievement of the underlying performance goals) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value on the grant date under US GAAP.

For options, a Black-Scholes model was used to estimate the fair value as of the various measurement dates. We explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards on the grant date in the “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” section of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Arrow’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the corresponding fiscal year.

(e)

Represents the excess fair value, if any, of modified option awards and stock awards over the fair value of the original awards as of the modification. For 2025, reflects the incremental fair value associated with the modification of Mr. Kerins outstanding option awards to extend the post-termination exercise period.

(4)

The amounts in this column show changes over our past five fiscal years in the value of $100 (assuming reinvestment of dividends) invested in Arrow’s common shares traded on the NYSE.

(5)

The amounts in this column show changes over the past five fiscal years in the value of $100 (assuming reinvestment of dividends), invested in Arrow’s Peer Group, consisting of Avnet, Inc., Celestica Inc., Flex Ltd., Jabil Inc., WESCO International, Inc., CDW Corp., HP Inc., HP Enterprise Co., and TD SYNNEX Corp.  

(6)

The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in Arrow’s audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year.

(7)

While we use numerous financial and non-financial performance measures to evaluate performance under our compensation programs, Absolute EPS is the financial performance measure that, in our assessment, represents the most important performance measure used to link “compensation actually paid” to NEOs to Company performance in 2025. Absolute EPS determines the payout with respect to 70% of our 2025 annual cash incentive. See Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of Absolute EPS to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

       
Company Selected Measure Name Absolute EPS        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote

(1)

NEOs included in these columns reflect the following:

Year

  ​ ​ ​

PEOs

  ​ ​ ​

Non-PEO NEOs

2025

William F. Austen (PEO 1)
Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Eric C. Nowak, Richard J. Marano, Gretchen K. Zech

2024

Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Eric C. Nowak, Gretchen K. Zech, Richard J. Marano, Kristin D. Russell

2023

Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Gretchen K. Zech, Kristin D. Russell, Carine L. Jean-Claude, Michael J. Long, Kirk D. Schell

2022

Sean J. Kerins (PEO 2)
Michael J. Long (PEO 3)

Rajesh K. Agrawal, Kirk D. Schell, Gretchen K. Zech, Vincent P. Melvin, Richard A. Seidlitz, Christopher D. Stansbury

2021

Michael J. Long (PEO 3)

Sean J. Kerins, Christopher D. Stansbury, Gretchen K. Zech, Vincent P. Melvin

       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote

(5)

The amounts in this column show changes over the past five fiscal years in the value of $100 (assuming reinvestment of dividends), invested in Arrow’s Peer Group, consisting of Avnet, Inc., Celestica Inc., Flex Ltd., Jabil Inc., WESCO International, Inc., CDW Corp., HP Inc., HP Enterprise Co., and TD SYNNEX Corp.  

       
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote

(3)

The following table shows the adjustment to the total compensation reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable reporting year for our PEOs, as well as the average for our other NEOs, to determine “compensation actually paid,” as computed in accordance with the Rules. Because “compensation actually paid,” as calculated per the Rules, requires the inclusion of equity awards as compensation prior to vesting of the awards, the amounts reported below do not reflect the actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year, with a significant portion of the “compensation actually paid” subject to forfeiture if the underlying vesting conditions are not achieved.

2025

Non-PEO

PEO 1

PEO 2

NEO Average

Total Compensation from the Summary Compensation Table

  ​ ​ ​

$

4,347,295

  ​ ​ ​

$

9,264,540

  ​ ​ ​

$

4,560,324

Adjustments for Pension

Adjustment Summary Compensation Table Pension (a)

$

$

(850,350)

$

(323,175)

Amount added for Current Year Service Cost (b)

$

$

788,693

$

210,780

Amount added for Prior Year Service Cost Impacting Current Year (b)

$

$

$

Total Adjustments for Pension

$

$

(61,657)

$

(112,395)

Adjustments for Equity Grants

Adjustment for grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table(c)

$

(3,795,113)

$

(7,380,290)

$

(2,725,054)

Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year(d)

$

3,278,186

$

$

2,798,731

Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years(d)

$

$

$

(318,497)

Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in the current year (d)

$

$

$

Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years(d)

$

$

(81,425)

$

9,232

Forfeitures during the current year equal to the prior year-end fair value(d)

$

$

(6,565,032)

$

Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in total compensation

$

$

$

Changes in fair value to reflect excess fair value resulting from modifications to stock option and stock awards(e)

$

$

380,206

$

Total Adjustments for Equity Awards

$

(516,927)

$

(13,646,542)

$

(235,588)

Compensation Actually Paid

$

3,830,368

$

(4,443,659)

$

4,212,341

(a)

The amounts reflect the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable year.

(b)

The amounts represent the sum of the actuarial present value of the benefits under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans attributable to services rendered during the indicated fiscal year and any plan modifications during the applicable year, calculated using the same methodology as used in Arrow’s financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles.

(c)

The amounts reflect the aggregate grant-date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable year.

(d)

In accordance with the Rules, the fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were remeasured starting on December 31, 2019, and subsequently as of each vesting date and as of the end of each fiscal year while the award remains unvested, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, risk-free interest rates, and probability of achievement of the underlying performance goals) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value on the grant date under US GAAP.

For options, a Black-Scholes model was used to estimate the fair value as of the various measurement dates. We explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards on the grant date in the “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” section of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Arrow’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the corresponding fiscal year.

(e)

Represents the excess fair value, if any, of modified option awards and stock awards over the fair value of the original awards as of the modification. For 2025, reflects the incremental fair value associated with the modification of Mr. Kerins outstanding option awards to extend the post-termination exercise period.

       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 4,560,324 $ 2,895,533 $ 3,224,995 $ 2,734,955 $ 3,902,722
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 4,212,341 2,176,724 3,983,576 2,070,990 6,736,978
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote

(3)

The following table shows the adjustment to the total compensation reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable reporting year for our PEOs, as well as the average for our other NEOs, to determine “compensation actually paid,” as computed in accordance with the Rules. Because “compensation actually paid,” as calculated per the Rules, requires the inclusion of equity awards as compensation prior to vesting of the awards, the amounts reported below do not reflect the actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year, with a significant portion of the “compensation actually paid” subject to forfeiture if the underlying vesting conditions are not achieved.

2025

Non-PEO

PEO 1

PEO 2

NEO Average

Total Compensation from the Summary Compensation Table

  ​ ​ ​

$

4,347,295

  ​ ​ ​

$

9,264,540

  ​ ​ ​

$

4,560,324

Adjustments for Pension

Adjustment Summary Compensation Table Pension (a)

$

$

(850,350)

$

(323,175)

Amount added for Current Year Service Cost (b)

$

$

788,693

$

210,780

Amount added for Prior Year Service Cost Impacting Current Year (b)

$

$

$

Total Adjustments for Pension

$

$

(61,657)

$

(112,395)

Adjustments for Equity Grants

Adjustment for grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table(c)

$

(3,795,113)

$

(7,380,290)

$

(2,725,054)

Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year(d)

$

3,278,186

$

$

2,798,731

Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years(d)

$

$

$

(318,497)

Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in the current year (d)

$

$

$

Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years(d)

$

$

(81,425)

$

9,232

Forfeitures during the current year equal to the prior year-end fair value(d)

$

$

(6,565,032)

$

Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in total compensation

$

$

$

Changes in fair value to reflect excess fair value resulting from modifications to stock option and stock awards(e)

$

$

380,206

$

Total Adjustments for Equity Awards

$

(516,927)

$

(13,646,542)

$

(235,588)

Compensation Actually Paid

$

3,830,368

$

(4,443,659)

$

4,212,341

(a)

The amounts reflect the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable year.

(b)

The amounts represent the sum of the actuarial present value of the benefits under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans attributable to services rendered during the indicated fiscal year and any plan modifications during the applicable year, calculated using the same methodology as used in Arrow’s financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles.

(c)

The amounts reflect the aggregate grant-date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the applicable year.

(d)

In accordance with the Rules, the fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were remeasured starting on December 31, 2019, and subsequently as of each vesting date and as of the end of each fiscal year while the award remains unvested, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, risk-free interest rates, and probability of achievement of the underlying performance goals) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value on the grant date under US GAAP.

For options, a Black-Scholes model was used to estimate the fair value as of the various measurement dates. We explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards on the grant date in the “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” section of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Arrow’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the corresponding fiscal year.

(e)

Represents the excess fair value, if any, of modified option awards and stock awards over the fair value of the original awards as of the modification. For 2025, reflects the incremental fair value associated with the modification of Mr. Kerins outstanding option awards to extend the post-termination exercise period.

       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return

Graphic

       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income

Graphic

       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure

Graphic

       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group

Graphic

       
Tabular List, Table

As required by the Rules, the following is a list of the most important performance measures used to link “compensation actually paid” to Company performance. The role of each of these performance measures in our executive compensation programs is more thoroughly discussed in the “Executive Compensation” section in the CD&A along with a description of how executive compensation relates to Company performance and how the Compensation Committee makes its decisions.

Tabular List

  ​ ​ ​

  ​ ​ ​

Absolute EPS

Relative EPS Growth

ROIC

Relative TSR

       
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 113 116 126 107 138
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 249 200 170 132 147
Net Income (Loss) $ 571,000,000 $ 392,000,000 $ 904,000,000 $ 1,427,000,000 $ 1,108,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount | $ / shares 10.33 10.83 17.06 23.13 15.6
PEO Name William F. Austen        
Annual cash incentive percentage to determine Absolute EPS 70.00%        
Measure:: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Absolute EPS        
Non-GAAP Measure Description

(7)

While we use numerous financial and non-financial performance measures to evaluate performance under our compensation programs, Absolute EPS is the financial performance measure that, in our assessment, represents the most important performance measure used to link “compensation actually paid” to NEOs to Company performance in 2025. Absolute EPS determines the payout with respect to 70% of our 2025 annual cash incentive. See Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of Absolute EPS to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

       
Measure:: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Relative EPS Growth        
Measure:: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name ROIC        
Measure:: 4          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Relative TSR        
William F. Austen          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 4,347,295        
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount 3,830,368        
Sean J. Kerins          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
PEO Total Compensation Amount 9,264,540 $ 8,229,294 $ 8,891,814 $ 7,478,225  
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount (4,443,659) $ 6,233,382 $ 8,801,499 8,049,694  
Michael J. Long          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
PEO Total Compensation Amount       11,550,022 $ 12,880,838
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount       $ 6,516,685 $ 24,843,768
PEO | William F. Austen | Equity Awards Adjustments          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (516,927)        
PEO | William F. Austen | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (3,795,113)        
PEO | William F. Austen | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 3,278,186        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pension (61,657)        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (850,350)        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 788,693        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Equity Awards Adjustments          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (13,646,542)        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (7,380,290)        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (81,425)        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (6,565,032)        
PEO | Sean J. Kerins | Changes In Fair Value To Reflect Excess Fair Value Resulting From Modifications To Stock Option And Stock Awards [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 380,206        
Non-PEO NEO          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pension (112,395)        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (323,175)        
Non-PEO NEO | Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 210,780        
Non-PEO NEO | Equity Awards Adjustments          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (235,588)        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (2,725,054)        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 2,798,731        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (318,497)        
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 9,232        
v3.26.1
Award Timing Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Award Timing Disclosures [Line Items]  
Award Timing MNPI Disclosure

The Compensation Committee and senior management monitor Arrow’s equity grant practices to evaluate whether such policies comply with governing regulations and are consistent with good corporate practices. Arrow’s equity grants under its executive compensation program consist of RSUs and PSUs and Arrow does not currently utilize options, stock-appreciation rights, or similar equity instruments as a component of its executive-officer compensation.

When making regular annual equity grants, the Compensation Committee’s practice is to approve them at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the calendar year as part of the annual compensation review and after results for the preceding fiscal year become available. Because the Compensation Committee’s regular meeting schedule is determined in the prior fiscal year, the proximity of any awards to other significant corporate events is coincidental. In addition, the Board or Compensation Committee may make grants at any time during the year it deems appropriate, including with respect to new hires or transitions. Arrow does not schedule its equity grants in anticipation of the release of MNPI nor does Arrow time the release of MNPI based on equity grant dates.

Award Timing Method

When making regular annual equity grants, the Compensation Committee’s practice is to approve them at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the calendar year as part of the annual compensation review and after results for the preceding fiscal year become available. Because the Compensation Committee’s regular meeting schedule is determined in the prior fiscal year, the proximity of any awards to other significant corporate events is coincidental. In addition, the Board or Compensation Committee may make grants at any time during the year it deems appropriate, including with respect to new hires or transitions. Arrow does not schedule its equity grants in anticipation of the release of MNPI nor does Arrow time the release of MNPI based on equity grant dates.

Award Timing Predetermined true
Award Timing MNPI Considered false
Award Timing, How MNPI Considered Arrow does not schedule its equity grants in anticipation of the release of MNPI nor does Arrow time the release of MNPI based on equity grant dates
MNPI Disclosure Timed for Compensation Value false
v3.26.1
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures [Line Items]  
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures Adopted true