UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report
 
TERADATA CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	 	001-33458	 	75-3236470	
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)	 	(Commission
File Number)	 	(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)	
10000 Innovation Drive
Dayton, Ohio 45342
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
Stephen M. Scheppmann (866) 548-8348
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report)
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
☒    Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2016.

Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report
A copy of the Teradata Corporation Conflict Minerals Report for the year ended December 31, 2016 is provided as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD and is publicly available at www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility and then selecting “Teradata Conflict Minerals Report for 2016.”
Section 2 - Exhibits
Item 2.01 Exhibits
Exhibit 1.01        Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form.
 
2

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TERADATA CORPORATION	 		
		
By: /s/ Stephen M. Scheppmann                	 	Date: May 24, 2017	
Stephen M. Scheppmann	 		
Executive Vice President and	 		
Chief Financial Officer	 		
 
3

Exhibit 1.01
Teradata Corporation
Conflict Minerals Report
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
This Conflict Minerals Report (this “Report”) has been prepared by Teradata Corporation (herein referred to, alternatively, as “Teradata,” “we,” “us” and “our”) for the reporting period January 1 to December 31, 2016, and is presented to comply with the final Conflict Minerals implementing rules (the “Conflict Minerals Rules”) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and codified in Section 13(p) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as modified by SEC guidance issued on April 29, 2014 and the SEC order issued on May 2, 2014 (the “Conflict Minerals Rules”). “Conflict Minerals” are currently defined by the SEC as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite (coltan), wolframite, gold, or their derivatives, which the SEC has currently limited to tin, tantalum and tungsten (collectively, the “Subject Minerals,” “Conflict Minerals” or “3TG”).
To comply with the Conflict Minerals Rules, we conducted due diligence on the origin, source and chain of custody of the Conflict Minerals that were necessary to the functionality or production of the products that we manufactured or contracted to manufacture, for which manufacturing was completed during 2016, in order to ascertain whether these Conflict Minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country and financed or benefited Armed Groups (as defined in Section 1, Item 1.01(d)(2) of Form SD) in any of these countries. Our due diligence undertakings are described in this Report, which includes the activities of all our affiliates that are required to be consolidated.
When this Report uses the term “conflict-free” it means the applicable Conflict Minerals, smelters or refiners have been verified as complying with the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative’s (the “CFSI”) Conflict-Free Smelter Program (the “CFSP”) or an equivalent third-party audit program. When this Report uses the terms the “Covered Countries,” “DRC” or “DRC Region” it means the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, including Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.
 
 	1.	Company Overview	
Teradata is a global leader in analytic data solutions and related consulting, support and implementation services. Some of our analytic data solutions are deployed on workload-specific “platforms,” comprised of workload-specific computer hardware and software, that we sell, license or otherwise distribute to, or for the use of, our customers ( e.g., on-premises platforms), while others are deployed on cloud, as-a-service or software-only delivery models. Our workload-specific platforms for on-premises use include the Teradata hardware products that are within the scope of this Report. Our workload-specific platforms are used in multiple industries, including communications, ecommerce, financial services, gaming, government, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing, media and entertainment, oil and gas, retail, travel and transportation, and utilities. During 2016, we conducted business in approximately 77 countries (43 directly and 34 indirectly such as through distributors), had 1,400 analytic data solutions customers and employed approximately 10,000 people worldwide.
 
 	2.	Products Overview	
The equipment (excluding software) comprising our products typically includes electronic computer processors, boards, servers, data storage, power supplies, cabinetry and related tangible components. Collectively, the tangible components of those products are referred to in this Report as Teradata “hardware” or Teradata “hardware products.” Other products, including third-party equipment, that Teradata does not manufacture or contract to manufacture are outside the scope of this Report.
We engineer, design and establish specifications for our hardware products, leveraging best-in-class components from industry leaders and using industry-standard technologies selected and configured to work optimally with other hardware components and software. Each of our hardware products shares some common hardware components and/or suppliers with our other hardware products.
 
1

During 2016, Teradata did not manufacture any of our hardware products. All Teradata hardware manufactured during 2016 (as well as during 2013, 2014 and 2015) for distribution to others was manufactured for us under contract by our sole-source electronics manufacturing services provider, Flex Ltd. (previously “Flextronics International Ltd.”) (“Flex” or our “Contract-Manufacturer”).
We have determined that certain of these products for which manufacturing was completed during 2016 contain Conflict Minerals. Those products are:
 
 	●	 	Teradata Workload-Specific Platforms, including the Teradata Active Enterprise Data Warehouse, Teradata Data Warehouse Appliance, Teradata Data Mart Appliance, Teradata Appliance for SAS ® and Teradata Integrated Big Data Platform;	
 
 	●	 	Teradata Aster Discovery Platforms, including the Teradata Aster Analytics Appliance;	
 
 	●	 	Teradata Appliance for Hadoop; and	
 
 	●	 	Teradata Platform Framework Cabinet.	
 
 	3.	Supply Chain Overview	
During 2016, 85 suppliers, including our Contract-Manufacturer and its affiliates, directly provided hardware components and materials for Teradata hardware products (“key suppliers”). Our Contract-Manufacturer assembled those hardware components, performed and completed the manufacturing of our hardware products, and initiated distribution of those products from the United States. The hardware components and materials included in our hardware products include components and materials from multiple upstream suppliers, supplier-tiers and sources across the world. Teradata is multiple supplier-tiers downstream from the smelters and refiners that provide materials used in the supply-chain for Teradata hardware components. Teradata has had no direct relationships with those smelters or refiners, and has had no direct presence, direct business activities or employees located in the Covered Countries.
 
 	4.	Conflict Minerals Analysis	
Based upon a review of our product categories, we have concluded that:
 
 	●	 	Teradata is subject to the Conflict Minerals Rule;	
 
 	●	 	the Subject Minerals are commonly known to be used widely in the electronics industry and found in many electronic computing hardware components;	
 
 	●	 	the Subject Minerals are in various Teradata hardware product components;	
 
 	●	 	the Subject Minerals included in our hardware products did not originate exclusively from recycled or scrap resources; and	
 
 	●	 	all of the Subject Minerals included in our hardware products did not originate exclusively from supplies that entered the supply-chain before the period covered by the Rule ( e.g., before January 2013).	
We determined that our sole-source Contract-Manufacturer has:
 
 	●	 	declared it has a Conflict Minerals Policy, program and training module available for its suppliers and publishes documents regarding such (see the Flex “Conflict Minerals Policy” by selecting this link - https://flex.com/sites/default/files/component_b2/Conflict%2520Minerals%2520Policy.pdf and see the Flex “Conflict Minerals Supplier Training” by selecting this link - https://flex.com/sites/default/files/component_b2/Conflict%2520Minerals%2520Supplier%2520Training.pdf).	
 
 	●	 	declared that it is a member of the CFSI and that it uses the CFSI, CFSP and CFSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”) in connection with its Conflict Minerals program (see links above as well as http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/about/members-and-collaborations listing members of the CFSI (which includes Flex and Teradata) and http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/which provides information about the CFSI, CFSP and CMRT); and	
 
2

 	●	 	identified itself as being a reporting company under the Rule and posted such a report in 2016 for products it manufactured during 2015 (see http://d1lge852tjjqow.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000866374/3a87feee-8597-4a7a-92f8-0df249a1fb4c.pdf ) and in 2015 for products it manufactured during 2014 (see http://d1lge852tjjqow.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000866374/9975f203-1235-49a2-adb8-a79f0ac761fe.pdf?noexit=true ) and in 2014 for products it manufactured during 2013 (see http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ABEA-28U2SZ/0x0xS1104659-14-42967/866374/filing.pdf ).	
 
 	5.	Teradata’s Due Diligence Framework	
Teradata has designed its Conflict Minerals Policy and associated due diligence processes to support and align with the CFSI and CFSP frameworks and thereby with the five-step framework set forth in the Third Edition of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD”) “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas” and the supplements thereto (see http://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/mining.htm). The activities, websites, links and documents summarized and cited there and throughout this report address these undertakings.
 
 	A.	Establishment of Robust Company Ethics and Compliance Management Systems	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has adopted and maintains a policy on Conflict Minerals (the “Policy”), which can be viewed on our website at: www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility . The Policy has been communicated to relevant personnel and is available to all Teradata employees via Teradata’s website. Among other things, the Policy:	

°	  	authorizes and assigns responsibilities for a Teradata Conflict Minerals Management Committee;	
°	  	encourages respect and protection of human rights and the environment with our supply-chain;	
°	  	fosters supply-chain integrity, ethics, compliance and accountability, including with respect to Conflict Minerals, Conflict Minerals legal duties and Conflict Minerals industry/framework initiatives;	
		
°	  	prohibits knowing inclusion of Targeted DRC Conflict Minerals in our hardware products;	
		
°	  	establishes an escalation and corrective actions process in the event of actual or suspected Conflict Minerals compliance risks, exceptions or violations;	
		
°	  	establishes an expectation or requirement with our supply-chain that the 3TG content in our hardware products must become conflict-free as and when required by law and SEC guidance;	
		
°	  	adopted procedures and expectations that our Conflict Minerals initiatives and status are reviewed with Teradata senior management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors; and	
		
°	  	adopted procedures and expectations that our Conflict Minerals Policy is reviewed and updated at least annually and on an intermediate as-required basis to assure that any new legal developments are accounted for on a timely basis.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has prepared this Conflict Minerals Report for 2016 (replacing previously posted versions for 2013, 2014 and 2015) and posted it on our website at www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility ).	
 
3

 	●	 	Teradata has declared its support for and adopted the principles of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (“EICC”) Code of Conduct. The EICC Code of Conduct includes provisions regarding responsible sourcing of minerals, including with respect to 3TG and DRC Region Conflict Minerals at section D.7. of the EICC Code of Conduct (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct and www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility , including in the linked “Teradata Code of Conduct” and “Teradata Corporate Social Responsibility Report”; and, see the EICC Code of Conduct at http://www.eiccoalition.org/standards/code-of-conduct/).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has declared our support for and adopted the principles of the United Nations (“UN”) Global Compact (Principle Two of the UN Global Compact includes that businesses should make sure they are not complicit in human rights abuses), been a signatory to the UN Global Compact, been a financial supporter of the UN Global Compact, submitted UN Global Compact Communications on Progress (the “Teradata Corporate Social Responsibility Report”) and posted related information on our website (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct and www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility , including in the linked “Teradata Code of Conduct” and “Teradata Corporate Social Responsibility Report”; and, see information regarding the UN Global Compact, its principles, its members (including Teradata), its financial supporters (including Teradata) and its members who have submitted Communications on Progress at https://www.unglobalcompact.org/ and https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/15948-Teradata-Corporation ).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has adopted a company Code of Conduct and posted it for public access on our website, which includes provisions related to respecting and protecting human rights, our adoption of the principles of the EICC Code of Conduct and UN Global Compact and compliance regarding, among other areas, Conflict Minerals (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct , including in the linked “Teradata Code of Conduct”).	
 
 	●	 	We have adopted a Teradata Supplier Code of Conduct and Teradata Business Partner Code of Conduct (each includes Conflict Minerals compliance provisions and the principles of the EICC Code of Conduct and UN Global Compact) and posted them for public access on our website (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct and www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility , including the documents linked for the “Teradata Code of Conduct for Suppliers” and the “Teradata Code of Conduct for Business Partners”).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has maintained and communicated information about the Teradata Ethics Helpline ( e.g., a whistleblower hotline) though which anyone may report Teradata-related actual or suspected violations of policies or laws or raise Teradata-related issues for review and guidance, and may do so on an anonymous and confidential basis (anyone may report and seek guidance regarding Teradata-related matters that pertain to Conflict Minerals through our Ethics Helpline (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct and www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility , including the documents linked for the “Teradata Code of Conduct,” the “Teradata Code of Conduct for Suppliers” and the “Teradata Code of Conduct for Business Partners,” as well as the online site for the Teradata Ethics Helpline at https://tdhelp.alertline.com/gcs/welcome ).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has maintained an Ethics and Compliance program and process for investigating, taking corrective actions and reporting matters related to ethics, compliance, actual or suspected violations of policies and actual or suspected violations of law (these include matters involving policies or laws that pertain to Conflict Minerals, of which there have been none) (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct and www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility , including the documents linked for the “Teradata Code of Conduct,” the “Teradata Code of Conduct for Suppliers,” the “Teradata Code of Conduct for Business Partners” and the “Teradata Corporate Social Responsibility Report”; the linkage between our Conflict Minerals compliance processes and our broader Ethics and Compliance processes is described in our Conflict Minerals Policy).	
 
4

 	●	 	We have issued an annual Teradata Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) Report (which includes reference to our Conflict Minerals policy and program, supply-chain integrity initiatives and initiatives to support and help protect human rights) and posted it for public access on our website (see www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility ).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has included Conflict Minerals, human rights and third-party due-diligence awareness and compliance in our ethics, compliance and code-of-conduct training for employees and members of our Board of Directors (see www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct and www.teradata.com/corporate-social-responsibility , including the documents linked for the “Teradata Code of Conduct” and the “Teradata Corporate Social Responsibility Report”).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has included requirements that Flex and our suppliers comply with our Conflict Minerals Policy in certain relevant specifications and vendor regulatory compliance criteria for our hardware products.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has included compliance with Conflict Minerals requirements provisions in certain relevant contracts with our Contract-Manufacturer and/or key suppliers.	
 
 	B.	Supply Chain Risk Identification and Assessment	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has communicated with our Contract-Manufacturer regarding Conflict Minerals surveying, tracking, reporting, expectations and upstream key supplier communications with respect to direct suppliers of components for our hardware who have not been identified as solely supplying components that do not contain any 3TG ( e.g., plastic, aluminum, packaging, labels, documentation and other non-3TG-containing components).	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has reviewed our Contract-Manufacturer’s Forms SD and Conflict Minerals Reports for 2015 (see http://d1lge852tjjqow.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000866374/3a87feee-8597-4a7a-92f8-0df249a1fb4c.pdf ), 2014 (see http://d1lge852tjjqow.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000866374/9975f203-1235-49a2-adb8-a79f0ac761fe.pdf?	
noexit=true ), and 2013 (see http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ABEA-28U2SZ/0x0xS1104659-14-42967/866374/filing.pdf ).
 
 	●	 	Teradata has reviewed some ( e.g., spot-checked) relevant websites, statements, Conflict Minerals Policies and/or Conflict Minerals Reports of some key suppliers regarding their stated Conflict Minerals initiatives, processes, reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) processes and due diligence processes.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata has received and reviewed a CFSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template form for 2016 (as well as 2013, 2014 and 2015) completed by our Contract-Manufacturer with respect to our hardware products; designed our Conflict Minerals program and actions and determinations related to our Conflict Minerals program described in this Report to materially meet RCOI requirements of the Rule and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas; Second Edition, including related supplements regarding 3TG.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata is a participating, membership-fee-supporting member of the CFSI (see http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/about/members-and-collaborations/ ).	
 
5

 	●	 	Teradata has, through our participation in and support of the CFSI, helped make Conflict Minerals training, guidance and resources available to our employees, suppliers and others (see http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/media/flash/conflict-minerals-overview/ ; http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/resources-and-training/training/ and http://www.conflictfreesourcing.org/resources-and-training/guidance-documents/ ).	
 
 	C.	Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (“RCOI”)	
Our Contract-Manufacturer reported to us the following with respect to our hardware products manufactured during 2016:
 
 	●	 	58 key suppliers of components for our hardware for 2016 were surveyed regarding Conflict Minerals using the CFSI framework; 27 of our total 85 key suppliers were not surveyed because it was determined that they solely provide components or materials that do not to contain any 3TG at all or are outside the scope of the Rule, such as components or materials that are solely plastic, non-metallic fasteners, aluminum, packaging, test media, documentation, ink or a label; and	
 
 	●	 	as of April 28, 2017, of the 58 key suppliers surveyed, 21 of the responses of those key suppliers for 2016 were deemed complete, 37 were open ( e.g., awaiting responses or supplemental responses), 0 were rejected or repeated ( e.g., identity of smelter or refiner not provided or deemed to be invalid) and 0 had some other identified problem ( e.g., response in a form other than through the CMRT).	
The CFSI CMRT completed by our sole-source Contract-Manufacturer and provided to us for 2016 regarding our hardware products includes the following as of April 28, 2017:
 
 	●	 	each of the Subject Minerals is intentionally included in Teradata’s hardware products;	
 
 	●	 	each of the Subject Minerals is necessary to the production of Teradata’s hardware products and contained in our hardware products;	
 
 	●	 	some of the tantalum, tin and tungsten in Teradata’s hardware products originates from the Covered Countries;	
 
 	●	 	it is unknown if any of the gold in Teradata’s hardware products originates from the Covered Countries;	
 
 	●	 	100% of the Subject Minerals in Teradata’s hardware products do not originate from recycled or scrap sources;	
 
 	●	 	Conflict Minerals data/information has not yet been received from 100% of suppliers of 3TG used in Teradata’s hardware;	
 
 	●	 	all smelters of the Subject Minerals in Teradata’s hardware products have not yet been identified for all of the Subject Minerals;	
 
 	●	 	all applicable smelter information received by Teradata’s Contract-Manufacturer has been reported in its CMRT declaration that was provided to us;	
 
 	●	 	Teradata’s Contract-Manufacturer has a policy in place that addresses Conflict Minerals sourcing, and that policy is publicly available on Flex’s website at https://flex.com/sites/default/files/component_b2/Conflict%2520Minerals%2520Policy.pdf ;	
 
 	●	 	Among other things, Flex’s Conflict Minerals sourcing policy:	

°	  	requires its direct suppliers to be DRC conflict-free;	
°	  	it requires its direct suppliers to source 3TG from smelters whose due diligence practices have been validated by an independent private sector audit program;	
		
°	  	it has implemented due diligence measures for conflict-free sourcing;	
 
6

			
°	  	it collects Conflict Minerals due diligence information from its suppliers which is in conformance with IPC-1755 Conflict Minerals Data Exchange standard ( e.g., the CFSI CMRT);	
		
°	  	it requests smelter names from its suppliers;	
°	  	it reviews due diligence information it receives from its suppliers against its expectations;	
°	  	its review process includes corrective action management; and	
°	  	it is subject to the SEC Conflict Minerals Rule.	
In connection with that CMRT, our Contract-Manufacturer provided us with information regarding 322 smelters/refiners/sources of the Subject Minerals included during 2016 in our hardware products as identified in direct supplier surveys. Annex I of this Report includes a list of source countries for each of the Subject Minerals identified through that process. The information provided by our Contract-Manufacturer correspondingly identifies the following for each of the Subject Minerals as of April 28, 2017:
 
 	●	 	Gold – 139 smelters/refiners/sources of recycled, scrap and mined gold, sourced from 20 countries;	
 
 	●	 	Tantalum – 48 smelters/refiners/sources of recycled, scrap and mined tantalum sourced from 22 countries;	
 
 	●	 	Tin – 86 smelters/refiners/sources of recycled, scrap and mined tin sourced from 20 countries; and	
 
 	●	 	Tungsten – 49 smelters/refiners/sources of recycled, scrap and mined tungsten sourced from 21 countries.	
Of the 139 identified gold smelters/refiners/sources, 93 (67%) were listed as CFSP compliant, 7 (5%) were listed as CFSP active and 39 (28%) were not CFSP listed — for a total CFSP compliant/active rate for identified sources of gold in our supply-chain of 72%.
Of the 48 identified tantalum smelters/refiners/sources, 44 (92%) were listed as CFSP compliant, 0 (0%) were listed as CFSP active and 4 (8%) were not CFSP listed — for a total CFSP compliant/active rate for identified sources of tantalum in our supply-chain of 92%.
Of the 86 identified tin smelters/refiners/sources, 65 (76%) were listed as CFSP compliant, 7 (8%) were listed as CFSP active and 14 (16%) were not CFSP listed — for a total CFSP compliant/active rate for identified sources of tin in our supply-chain of 84%.
Of the 49 identified tungsten smelters/refiners/sources, 40 (82%) were listed as CFSP compliant, 0 (0%) were listed as CFSP active and 9 (18%) were not CFSP listed — for a total CFSP compliant/active rate for identified sources of tungsten in our supply-chain of 82%.
Thus, of the 322 total identified smelters/refiners/sources of the Subject Minerals, 242 (75%) were listed as CFSP compliant, 14 (4%) were listed as CFSP active and 66 (21%) were not CFSP listed — for a total CFSP compliant/active rate for identified sources of the Subject Minerals in our supply-chain of 80%.
Teradata subsequently spot-checked CFSI/CFSP data regarding our key suppliers for adverse discrepancies and red flags versus the information and data reported to us by our Contract Manufacturer. We did not detect any adverse discrepancies or red flags from this spot-check. The actions and determinations relevant to RCOI set forth above in this Report, the information in Annex I, the information provided to us by our Contract-Manufacturer from which we derived the information in Annex I, our review of that information, and the immediately preceding paragraph reflect and summarize our RCOI process and results for our hardware products manufactured during 2016.
 
7

 	D.	Teradata’s Responses to Identified Risks	
In connection with the CMRT for 2016 from our Contract-Manufacturer and as of April 28, 2017, our Contract-Manufacturer identified to us 39 smelters/refiners/sources for the Subject Minerals included in our hardware products that reportedly source, or reportedly might source, directly and/or indirectly, 3TG from mines or sources in the Covered Countries. Those smelters/refiners/sources are listed in Annex II of this Report. Included are 30 smelters/refiners of tantalum, 5 smelters/refiners of tin and 4 smelters/refiners of tungsten. All 39 of those smelters (100%) have been identified as being DRC conflict-free for their respective Subject Minerals, in accordance with the CFSI/CFSP protocols. Thus, the total CFSP compliant rate for identified sources of the Subject Minerals in our supply-chain originating from the Covered Countries is 100%.
We subsequently spot-checked CFSI/CFSP data regarding these smelters/refiners of DRC-sourced 3TG for adverse discrepancies and red flags versus the information and data reported to us by our Contract Manufacturer. We did not detect any adverse discrepancies or red flags from this spot-check. The actions and determinations relevant to Conflict Minerals due diligence set forth above, the information in Annex II, the information provided to us by both CFSI and our Contract-Manufacturer from which we derived the information in Annex II, our review of that information, and the immediately preceding paragraph summarize our Conflict Minerals due diligence process and results for our hardware products manufactured during 2016.
 
 	E.	Continued Risk Mitigation	
Teradata continues to build upon its Conflict Minerals program attributes and activities set forth in this Report. Specifically, during 2016:
 
 	●	 	All smelters/refiners identified by our Contract-Manufacturer to us that reportedly source, or reportedly might source, directly or indirectly, 3TG from mines or sources in the Covered Countries were on the CFSP-compliant list for 2016.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata increased the total number of identified smelters/refiners/sources for the Subject Minerals from 304 for 2015 to 322 in 2016.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata reduced the number of our key suppliers from 94 for 2015 to 85 for 2016.	
 
 	●	 	We generally maintained the percentage of total key suppliers which were surveyed during the year: 70% surveyed for 2015 and 68% surveyed for 2016.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata continued to include compliance with our Conflict Minerals Policy, the principles of the EICC Code of Conduct and the principles of the UN Global Compact in our Code of Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct and Business Partner Code of Conduct during 2016, and included information about each of those items in our annual all-employee ethics and compliance training for 2016.	
 
 	●	 	We reviewed and updated our Conflict Minerals Policy during 2016.	
 
 	●	 	We continue to report relevant information regarding Conflict Mineral requirements, compliance and status to our senior management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata further monitored legal developments and guidance related to Conflict Mineral compliance during 2016, and considered and applied relevant developments to our Conflict Minerals program.	
 
 	●	 	We continue to assess, with assistance from subject-matter-experts from an outside consulting firm, independent private sector audit (IPSA) readiness requirements and criteria for application to our Conflict Minerals program, should such undertakings become legally required in the future.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata maintains and supplements information and materials on our internal employee Conflict Minerals online resource and collaboration site.	
 
8

 	●	 	We maintain inquiries regarding Conflict Minerals as part of our compliance due diligence questionnaire template for merger-and-acquisition candidates.	
 
 	●	 	Teradata continues to be a member of the CFSI and financially support the CFSI through paying our CFSI membership-fees.	
 
 	●	 	By becoming a member of the CFSI starting in 2015, Teradata gained deeper direct access to CFSI participant data, enabling us to take measures to verify related data reported to us by our Contract Manufacturer and to review relevant data to look for red flags and indicia of risks, rather than relying solely on our Contract-Manufacturer to do so and report such to us.	
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this Report relating to due diligence and risk mitigation improvements are forward-looking in nature. These statements are not a guarantee of performance and are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors that may be outside of Teradata’s control and that could cause actual events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the statements made herein.
 
9

ANNEX I
To Teradata Corporation
Conflict Minerals Report
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
IDENTIFIED COUNTRIES/PLACES OF ORIGIN FOR CONFLICT MINERALS
Recycled, Scrap and Mines

Gold (20)	 	Tantalum (22)	 	Tin (20)	 	Tungsten (21)	
				
Benin	 	Australia	 	Australia	 	Australia	
Bolivia	 	Bolivia	 	Bolivia	 	Austria	
Burkina Faso	 	Brazil	 	Brazil	 	Bolivia	
Chile	 	Burundi	 	Burundi	 	Brazil	
Colombia	 	China	 	China	 	Burundi	
Ecuador	 	Democratic Republic of Congo	 	Colombia	 	Cambodia	
Eritrea	 	Ethiopia	 	Democratic Republic of Congo	 	Canada	
Ghana	 	France	 	Indonesia	 	China	
Guatemala	 	Guinea	 	Laos	 	Colombia	
Guinea	 	Guyana	 	Malaysia	 	Democratic Republic of Congo	
Guyana	 	India	 	Mongolia	 	Japan	
Honduras	 	Madagascar	 	Myanmar	 	Mexico	
Mali	 	Malaysia	 	Nigeria	 	Mongolia	
Nicaragua	 	Mozambique	 	Peru	 	Nigeria	
Panama	 	Namibia	 	Portugal	 	Portugal	
Peru	 	Nigeria	 	Russia	 	Russia	
Senegal	 	Russia	 	Rwanda	 	Rwanda	
South Africa	 	Rwanda	 	Thailand	 	Spain	
Togo	 	Sierra Leone	 	Uganda	 	United States of America	
United States of America	 	Thailand	 	Vietnam	 	Uzbekistan	
	 	United States of America	 		 	Vietnam	
	 	Zimbabwe	 		 		
 
10

ANNEX II
To Teradata Corporation
Conflict Minerals Report
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
IDENTIFIED POSSIBLE SMELTERS/REFINERS/SOURCES OF CONFLICT MINERALS FROM THE DRC REGION

Smelter/Refiner Name	 	Location	    	Smelter ID
Number	    	CFSP Compliance Status
(as listed at conflictfreesourcing.org)	
Tantalum (30)	 		    		    		
				
Changsha South Tantalum	 	China	    	CID000211	    	Compliant	
Niobium Co., Ltd.	 		    		    		
				
Conghua Tantalum and	 	China	    	CID000291	    	Compliant	
Niobium Smeltry	 		    		    		
				
Duoluoshan	 	China	    	CID000410	    	Compliant	
				
Exotech Inc.	 	USA	    	CID000456	    	Compliant	
				
F&X Electro-Materials Ltd.	 	China	    	CID000460	    	Compliant	
				
FIR Metals & Resource Ltd.	 	China	    	CID002505	    	Compliant	
				
Global Advanced Metals Aizu	 	Japan	    	CID002558	    	Compliant	
				
Global Advanced Metals Boyertown	 	USA	    	CID002557	    	Compliant	
				
Guangdong Zhiyuan	 	China	    	CID000616	    	Compliant	
New Materials Co., Ltd.	 		    		    		
				
H.C. Starck Co., Ltd.	 	Thailand	    	CID002544	    	Compliant	
				
H.C. Starck GmbH Goslar	 	Germany	    	CID002545	    	Compliant	
				
H.C. Starck Inc.	 	USA	    	CID002548	    	Compliant	
				
H.C. Starck Ltd.	 	Japan	    	CID002549	    	Compliant	
				
H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co. KG	 	Germany	    	CID002550	    	Compliant	
				
Hengyang King Xing Lifeng	 	China	    	CID002492	    	Compliant	
New Materials Co., Ltd.	 		    		    		
				
High-Temp Specialty Metals, Inc.	 	USA	    	CID000731	    	Compliant	
				
Jiangxi Tuohong New Raw Material	 	China	    	CID002842	    	Compliant	
				
JiuJiang JinXin Nonferrous Metals	 	China	    	CID000914	    	Compliant	
Co., Ltd.	 		    		    		
				
Jiujiang Tanbre Co., Ltd.	 	China	    	CID000917	    	Compliant	
				
Jiujiang Zhongao Tantalum &	 	China	    	CID002506	    	Compliant	
Niobium Co., Ltd.	 		    		    		
 
11

							
				
 KEMET Blue Metals	 	Mexico	    	CID002539	    	Compliant	
				
KEMET Blue Powder	 	USA	    	CID002568	    	Compliant	
				
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.	 	Japan	    	CID001192	    	Compliant	
				
Molycorp Silmet A.S.	 	Estonia	    	CID001200	    	Compliant	
				
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry
Co, Ltd.	 	China	    	CID001277	    	Compliant	
				
Taki Chemical Co., Ltd.	 	Japan	    	CID001869	    	Compliant	
				
Telex Metals	 	USA	    	CID001891	    	Compliant	
				
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC	 	Kazakhstan	    	CID001969	    	Compliant	
				
Yichun Jin Yang Rare Metal Co., Ltd.	 	China	    	CID002307	    	Compliant	
				
Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Group
Co., Ltd.	 	China	    	CID002232	    	Compliant	
				
Tin (5)	 		    		    		
				
Alpha	 	USA	    	CID000292	    	Compliant	
				
Malaysia Smelting Corporation	 	Malaysia	    	CID001105	    	Compliant	
				
Metallo-Chimique N.V.	 	Belgium	    	CID002773	    	Compliant	
				
Thaisarco	 	Thailand	    	CID001898	    	Compliant	
				
Yunnan Tin Company Limited	 	China	    	CID002180	    	Compliant	
				
Tungsten (4)	 		    		    		
				
Asia Tungsten Products Vietnam Ltd.	 	Vietnam	    	CID002502	    	Compliant	
				
Vietnam Youngsun Tungsten Industry
Co., Ltd.	 	Vietnam	    	CID002011	    	Compliant	
				
Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG	 	Austria	    	CID002044	    	Compliant	
				
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd.	 	China	    	CID002320	    	Compliant	
				
Gold (0)	 		    		    		
 
12