|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 1—BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS
Real Industry, Inc. (“Real Industry,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), formerly known as Signature Group Holding, Inc., is a Delaware holding company that operates through its operating subsidiaries. Management expects to grow the Company through acquisitions, as well as through organic efforts within our existing operations described below. Our current business strategy seeks to leverage our public company status, considerable United States (“U.S.”) federal net operating tax loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) and the experience of our executive management team to acquire operating businesses at prices and on terms that are aligned with our growth plans.
During the first quarter of 2015, the Company underwent a considerable transformation. On January 9, 2015, we completed the sale of North American Breaker Co., LLC (“NABCO”), previously our primary operating business. On February 27, 2015, we acquired the global recycling and specification alloys business (the “Real Alloy Business”) of Aleris Corporation (“Aleris”) (the “Real Alloy Acquisition”). The Real Alloy Business, operating under Real Alloy Intermediate Holding, LLC (“Real Alloy Parent”) through its wholly owned subsidiary Real Alloy Holding, Inc. (“Real Alloy”), is a global leader in third-party aluminum recycling. Real Alloy offers a broad range of products and services to wrought alloy processors, automotive original equipment manufacturers, and foundries and casters. Real Alloy’s customers include companies that participate in or sell to the automotive, consumer packaging, steel and durable goods, aerospace, and building and construction industries. Real Alloy processes scrap aluminum and by-products, and delivers recycled metal in solid or molten form according to customer specifications. Real Alloy’s facilities are capable of processing industrial (new) scrap, post-consumer (old/obsolete) scrap, and various aluminum by-products, providing a great degree of flexibility in reclaiming high-quality recycled aluminum. Real Alloy currently operates twenty-four facilities strategically located throughout North America and Europe and, as of June 30, 2016, had approximately 1,700 employees.
Other significant milestones achieved in 2015 included: on April 21, 2015, our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “RELY” as part of the NASDAQ Global Select Market; on May 28, 2015, our stockholders approved an amendment to our charter to change our name to Real Industry, Inc.; and in June 2015, Real Industry became a member of the Russell Global®, Russell 2000® and Russell Microcap® indexes.
As a result of the transformative nature of the acquisition and divestiture activities described above, our operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015, which included the results of operations of Real Alloy for approximately four months, are not comparable to the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016, in which Real Alloy is reporting results for the full six months in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”). See Note 11—Segment Information for additional information about our reportable segments.
The assets and liabilities and results of operations of NABCO, prior to its divestiture, are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented as a result of its sale in the first quarter of 2015, and the strategic shift in the Company’s operations. Discontinued operations also includes certain assets and liabilities related to the former businesses of our subsidiary SGGH, LLC (“SGGH”), then known as Fremont General Corporation (“Fremont”) and its primary operating subsidiary, Fremont Investment & Loan (“FIL”). See Note 12—Discontinued Operations for additional information about our discontinued operations.
|
NOTE 2—FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION AND RECENT ACCOUNTING UPDATES
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements comprise the accounts of Real Industry and its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. The Company evaluates subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 may not necessarily be indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2016. These interim period unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2016 (the “Annual Report”).
During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company identified an error in the depreciation expense reported in the December 31, 2015 consolidated financial statements, which resulted in the overstatement of property, plant and equipment, net, by $3.8 million, overstated deferred tax liability by $1.1 million and overstated net earnings by $2.7 million. The error occurred in the quarter ended December 31, 2015, and was corrected during the quarter ended March 31, 2016. As a result of the correction, cost of sales; gross profit; selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses; operating loss; loss from continuing operations; and net loss are each impacted by the correction, with $3.7 million of the adjustment classified in cost of sales and $0.1 million in SG&A expenses presented in the results of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Management has concluded that the error reflected in the December 31, 2015 consolidated financial statements was not material and that the error correction in 2016 is not expected to be material to the full year results of operations.
Recent accounting updates
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which was the result of a joint project by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The issuance of a comprehensive and converged standard on revenue recognition is expected to enable financial statement users to better understand and consistently analyze an entity’s revenue across industries, transactions and geographies. The standard will require additional disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the nature, amount, timing, and potential uncertainty of the revenue that is recognized. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and management is evaluating the application methods available, but has yet to select from either retrospective application to each prior reporting period presented or retrospective application with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of adoption. Management continues to evaluate the impact ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and disclosure requirements. The adoption and implementation of the accounting and disclosure requirements of ASU 2014-09 is expected to have a substantial impact on financial statement disclosures.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”), which clarifies two aspects of Topic 606, identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. Before an entity can identify its performance obligations in a contract with a customer, the entity first identifies the promised goods or services in the contract. ASU 2016-10 is intended to clarify the operability and understandability of the licensing implementation guidance. ASU 2016-10 will be effective for the Company in conjunction with the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance in connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-10”), which provides clarification to Topic 606 on how to assess collectability, present sales tax, treat noncash consideration, and account for completed and modified contracts at the time of transition. In addition, ASU 2016-12 clarifies that an entity retrospectively applying the guidance in Topic 606 is not required to disclose the effect of the accounting change in the period of adoption. The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU 2014-09, which is effective January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance in connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which generally requires companies to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet. This guidance will be effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) (“ASU 2016-06”), which clarifies what steps are required when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call or put options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts, which is one of the criteria for bifurcating an embedded derivative. Consequently, when an option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to exercise the option is related to interest rates or credit risks. ASU 2016-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, an option to recognize gross share-based compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications in the statement of cash flows. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
|
NOTE 3—INVENTORIES
The following table presents the components of inventories as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Real Alloy: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods |
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
Raw materials and work in process |
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
Total Real Alloy inventories |
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
Cosmedicine - finished goods |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Total inventories |
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
|
NOTE 4—DEBT AND REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
The following table presents the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Senior Secured Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount outstanding |
$ |
305.0 |
|
|
$ |
305.0 |
|
Unamortized original issue discount and issuance costs |
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
Senior Secured Notes, net |
|
292.7 |
|
|
|
290.7 |
|
Asset-Based Facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount outstanding |
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Asset-Based Facility, net |
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Capital leases |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Total long-term debt, net |
$ |
316.7 |
|
|
$ |
312.1 |
|
Long-term debt
Senior Secured Notes
The Senior Secured Notes mature on January 15, 2019 and interest is payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year through the date of maturity. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, interest expense associated with the Senior Secured Notes was $8.5 million and $8.7 million, respectively, including $1.0 million and $1.1 million of noncash expense related to the amortization of the original issue discount and debt issuance costs, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, interest expense was $17.3 million and $16.7 million, respectively, including $2.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of amortization of debt discount and issuance costs. As of June 30, 2016, the borrowers were in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Indenture of the Senior Secured Notes.
Asset-Based Facility
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, interest expense associated with the Asset-Based Facility was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, including $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt issuance costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, interest expense was $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, including $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt issuance costs. As of June 30, 2016, the borrowers were in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Asset-Based Facility.
Capital Leases
In the normal course of operations, Real Alloy enters into capital leases to finance office and other equipment for its operations. As of June 30, 2016, $2.4 million of the $4.3 million in capital lease obligations are due within the next twelve months.
Redeemable Preferred Stock
The Redeemable Preferred Stock was issued to Aleris on February 27, 2015 as a portion of the purchase price for the Real Alloy Acquisition and has a liquidation preference of $27.4 million, as of June 30, 2016. The Redeemable Preferred Stock pays quarterly dividends at a rate of 7% for the first eighteen months after the date of issuance, 8% for the next twelve months, and 9% thereafter. Dividends may be paid in-kind for the first two years, and thereafter will be paid in cash. All accrued and accumulated dividends on the Redeemable Preferred Stock will be prior and in preference to any dividend on any of the Company’s common stock or other junior securities.
The Company may generally redeem the shares of Redeemable Preferred Stock at any time at the liquidation preference, and the holders may require the Company to redeem their shares of Redeemable Preferred Stock at the liquidation preference upon a change of control as defined in the Indenture of the Senior Secured Notes (or any debt facility that replaces or redeems the Senior Secured Notes) to the extent that the change of control does not provide for such redemption at the liquidation preference. A holder of Redeemable Preferred Stock may require the Company to redeem all, but not less than all, of such holder’s Redeemable Preferred Stock sixty-six months after the issuance date. In addition, the Company shall redeem shares of Redeemable Preferred Stock to the extent Aleris is required to indemnify the Company under the Real Alloy Purchase Agreement for the Real Alloy Acquisition. The Redeemable Preferred Stock is not transferrable (other than to another subsidiary of Aleris) for eighteen months following issuance (or such longer period in connection with any ongoing indemnity claims under the Real Alloy Purchase Agreement).
The carrying value of Redeemable Preferred Stock is based on the estimated fair value of the instrument as of the issuance date plus dividends paid in-kind and accretion of the fair value adjustment to the Redeemable Preferred Stock. The difference between the liquidation preference and the estimated fair value as of the issuance date is being accreted over the period preceding the holder’s right to redeem the instrument, or sixty-six months.
The following table presents the activity related to the carrying value of Redeemable Preferred Stock during the six months ended June 30, 2016:
(In millions) |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
$ |
21.9 |
|
Dividends on Redeemable Preferred Stock, in-kind |
|
0.9 |
|
Accretion of fair value adjustment to Redeemable Preferred Stock |
|
0.5 |
|
Balance, June 30, 2016 |
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
NOTE 5—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
The following table summarizes the activity within stockholders’ equity attributable to Real Industry and noncontrolling interest for the six months ended June 30, 2016:
(In millions) |
Equity Attributable to Real Industry, Inc. |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|||
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
$ |
141.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
142.4 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
Dividends and accretion of fair value adjustment to Redeemable Preferred Stock |
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Warrants exercised |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Balance, June 30, 2016 |
$ |
131.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
132.2 |
|
The following table reflects changes in the shares of common stock outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2016:
|
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
|
28,891,766 |
|
Restricted common stock awards granted, net of treasury shares reissued |
|
344,406 |
|
Common stock issued from the exercise of Warrants |
|
20,000 |
|
Treasury shares acquired, net of reissuance |
|
(2,750 |
) |
Balance, June 30, 2016 |
|
29,253,422 |
|
|
NOTE 6—ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table summarizes the activity within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2016:
(In millions) |
Currency Translation Adjustments |
|
|
Pension Benefit Adjustments |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
(6.0 |
) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
Current period currency translation adjustments |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial gains, net of tax |
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Balance, end of period |
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Included in current period currency translation adjustments are $1.0 million of currency translation adjustment losses associated with intercompany loans considered long-term in nature.
See Note 8—Employee Benefit Plans for additional information about the Company’s periodic benefit expense.
|
NOTE 7—INCOME TAXES
At the end of each reporting period, Real Industry makes an estimate of its annual effective income tax rate. The estimate used for the six months ended June 30, 2016 may change in subsequent periods. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate applied to earnings and losses before income taxes primarily as a result of the mix of earnings, losses and tax rates between tax jurisdictions, and changes in valuation allowances. The income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $0.2 million income tax expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, income tax expense was $0.9 million, compared to a $7.2 million income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company has estimated U.S. federal NOLs of $871.8 million and non-U.S. NOLs of $27.6 million. The U.S. federal NOLs have a 20-year life and begin to expire after the 2027 tax year. Additionally, the Company has state NOLs in amounts that are comparable to the U.S. federal NOLs. Real Industry has valuation allowances recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. Real Industry intends to maintain its valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists to support their realization through achieving profitability.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and local jurisdictions, as well as foreign jurisdictions located in Canada, Mexico, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom. With few exceptions, the 2010 through 2015 tax years remain open to examination.
|
NOTE 8—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit expense under the German defined benefit pension plans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Service cost |
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial gains |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
NOTE 10—DERIVATIVE AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Derivatives
Real Alloy may use forward contracts and options, as well as contractual price escalators, to reduce the risks associated with its metal, natural gas, and certain currency exposures. Generally, Real Alloy enters into master netting arrangements with its counterparties and offsets net derivative positions with the same counterparties against amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under those arrangements in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. For classification purposes, Real Alloy records the net fair value of each type of derivative position expected to settle in less than one year (by counterparty) as a net current asset or liability and each type of long-term position as a net long-term asset or liability.
Metal hedging
Primarily in our RAEU segment, London Metal Exchange (“LME”) future swaps or forward contracts are sold as metal is purchased to fill fixed-priced customer sales orders. As sales orders are priced, LME future or forward contracts may be purchased, which generally settle within six months. Real Alloy may also buy put option contracts for managing metal price exposures. Option contracts require the payment of a premium, which is recorded as a realized loss upon settlement or expiration of the option contract. Upon settlement of the put option contracts, Real Alloy receives cash and recognizes a related gain if the LME closing price is less than the strike price of the put option. If the put option strike price is less than the LME closing price, no amount is paid and the option expires. As of June 30, 2016, Real Alloy had 30.0 thousand metric tons of metal buy and sell derivative contracts.
Natural gas hedging
To manage the price exposure for natural gas purchases, Real Alloy may fix the future price of a portion of its natural gas requirements by entering into financial hedge agreements. Under these swap agreements, payments are made or received based on the differential between the monthly closing price on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) and the contractual hedge price. Natural gas cost can also be managed through the use of cost escalators included in some long-term supply contracts with customers, which limits exposure to natural gas price risk. As of June 30, 2016, Real Alloy had 2.5 trillion British thermal unit forward buy contracts.
Currency exchange hedging
From time to time, Real Alloy may enter into currency forwards, futures, call options and similar derivative financial instruments to limit its exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. As of June 30, 2016, no currency derivative contracts were outstanding.
Credit risk
Real Alloy is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the derivative financial instruments discussed above; however, management does not anticipate any nonperformance by the counterparties. The counterparties are evaluated for creditworthiness and risk assessment prior to initiating trading activities with the brokers and periodically throughout each year while actively trading. As of June 30, 2016, no cash collateral was posted or held.
The table below presents gross amounts of recognized assets and liabilities, the amounts offset in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and the net amounts of assets and liabilities presented therein. As of June 30, 2016, there were no amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that have not been offset in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
|
Fair Value of Derivatives |
|
|
Fair Value of Derivatives |
|
||||||||||
|
as of June 30, 2016 |
|
|
as of December 31, 2015 |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
||||
Metal |
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Natural gas |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Total |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Effect of counterparty netting arrangements |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Net derivatives assets (liabilities) as classified in the consolidated balance sheets |
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
The following table presents details of the fair value of Real Alloy’s derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
Prepaid expenses, supplies, and other current assets |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Natural Gas |
Prepaid expenses, supplies, and other current assets |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Natural Gas |
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total derivative assets |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Natural Gas |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Common stock warrant liability
On June 11, 2010, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1.5 million shares of Real Industry’s common stock were issued (the “Warrants”). The aggregate purchase price for the Warrants was $0.3 million, due in equal installments as the Warrants vested, 20% upon issuance and, thereafter, 20% annually on the anniversary of the issuance date and, as of June 30, 2015, the Warrants are 100% vested. The Warrants expire in June 2020 and had an original exercise price of $10.30 per share. The Warrants were issued without registration in reliance on the exemption set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Warrants include customary terms that provide for certain adjustments of the exercise price and the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon the exercise of the Warrants in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, pro rata distributions and certain other fundamental transactions. Additionally, the Warrants are subject to pricing protection provisions. During the term of the Warrants, the pricing protection provisions provide that certain issuances of new shares of common stock at prices below the current exercise price of the Warrants automatically reduce the exercise price of the Warrants to the lowest per share purchase price of common stock issued. In February 2015, the Company issued shares of common stock in the Rights Offering at $5.64 per share, thereby reducing the exercise price of the Warrants to $5.64 per share. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, 20,000 Warrants were exercised on a cashless basis and, as of June 30, 2016, there were 1,448,333 Warrants outstanding.
The common stock warrant liability is a derivative liability related to the anti-dilution and pricing protection provisions of the Warrants. The fair value of the common stock warrant liability is based on a Monte Carlo simulation that utilizes various assumptions, including estimated volatility of 49.8% and an expected term of 3.9 years as of June 30, 2016, and 49.9% volatility and an expected term of 4.4 years as of December 31, 2015, along with a 60% equity raise probability assumption, and a 15% equity raise price discount assumption in the periods following the measurement date. The most significant input in determining the fair value of the common stock warrant liability is the price of our common stock on the measurement date. Significant decreases in the expected term or the equity raise probability and related assumptions would result in a minor decrease in the estimated fair value of the common stock warrant liability, while significant increases in the expected term or the equity raise probability and related assumptions would result in a minor increase in the estimated fair value of the common stock warrant liability. A 10% increase or decrease in any or all of the unobservable inputs would not have a material impact on the estimated fair value of the common stock warrant liability.
The following table presents changes in the fair value of the common stock warrant liability during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
Warrants exercised |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Change in fair value of common stock warrant liability |
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
Balance, end of period |
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
Fair values
Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value using quoted market prices and significant other observable inputs. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3—Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Where appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads, and credit considerations. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence and unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables set forth financial assets and liabilities and their level in the fair value hierarchy that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|||||
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
Hierarchy |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Derivative assets |
Level 2 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
Level 2 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Net derivative assets (liabilities) |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
Common stock warrant liability |
Level 3 |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments are included within losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Natural gas |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total realized losses |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Unrealized losses (gains): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Natural gas |
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total unrealized losses (gains) |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Other Financial Instruments
The following tables present the carrying values and estimated fair values of other financial instruments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
June 30, 2016 |
|
|||||
(In millions) |
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
Financing receivable |
Level 2 |
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
Loans receivable, net (other noncurrent assets) |
Level 3 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Notes |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
292.7 |
|
|
$ |
305.0 |
|
Asset-Based Facility |
Level 2 |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock |
Level 3 |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
|||||
(In millions) |
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
Financing receivable |
Level 2 |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
Restricted cash held in escrow (other current assets) |
Level 1 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Loans receivable, net (other noncurrent assets) |
Level 3 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Notes |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
290.7 |
|
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
Asset-Based Facility |
Level 2 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock |
Level 3 |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
The Company used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of each financial instrument as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash held in escrow
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash held in escrow are recorded at historical cost. The carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value as these instruments have short-term maturities and market interest rates.
Financing receivable
Financing receivable represents the net amount due from the sale and transfer of trade accounts receivable under a €50 million factoring facility (the “Factoring Facility”). The Factoring Facility provides for the transfer and sale of eligible receivables to a counterparty, the settlement of which generally occurs within thirty days of transfer, which are accounted for as true sales, and are included in operating cash flows. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, $83.7 million and $173.5 million, respectively, of receivables were transferred on a nonrecourse basis and proceeds of $81.6 million and $170.0 million, respectively, were received. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, $117.2 million of trade receivables were transferred and $119.0 million of proceeds were received. Administrative fees and expenses associated with the Factoring Facility were $0.2 million in each of the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and $0.4 million in each of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
The transferred receivables are isolated from Real Alloy’s accounts. Real Alloy maintains continuing involvement with the transferred receivables through limited servicing obligations, primarily related to recordkeeping. Real Alloy retains no rights to the transferred receivables, or associated collateral, and does not collect a servicing fee. Following transfer, Real Alloy has no further rights to any cash flows or other assets to any party related to the transfer.
The carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value as the financing receivable is generally outstanding for no more than thirty days and the counterparty is a large creditworthy financial institution.
Loans receivable, net
Loans receivable, net, consists of commercial real estate loans. The estimated fair value considers the collateral coverage of assets securing the loans and estimated credit losses, as well as variable interest rates, which approximate market interest rates.
Long-term debt – Senior Secured Notes
The estimated fair value of the Senior Secured Notes is based on observable market prices.
Long-term debt – Asset-Based Facility
The estimated fair value of the Asset-Based Facility is based on its market characteristics, including interest rates and maturity dates generally consistent with market terms.
Redeemable Preferred Stock
The estimated fair value of Redeemable Preferred Stock is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis using the Hull & White model, with a remaining term of fifty months, assuming either the holder will put or the issuer will call at the redemption date. The cash dividend yield and the Redeemable Preferred Stock, including the payment-in-kind Redeemable Preferred Stock, were discounted at the spot rate plus a 17.0% credit spread adjustment to a zero coupon yield curve, based on similar market instruments.
|
NOTE 11—SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that our chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”), who is our chief executive officer, manages the segments, evaluates financial results, and makes key operating decisions, and for which discrete financial information is available. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had two reportable segments: Real Alloy North America (“RANA”) and Real Alloy Europe (“RAEU”).
Measurement of segment income or loss and segment assets and liabilities
Our measure of profitability for our reportable segments is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and excludes certain other items (“Adjusted EBITDA”). Certain of the Company’s assets and liabilities have not been allocated to our reportable segments, including corporate cash, the common stock warrant liability, deferred income taxes, and long-term debt, none of which our CODM uses to evaluate the performance of our reportable segments. Additionally, certain of the Company’s corporate administrative expenses are not allocated to the reportable segments.
Reportable segment information
The following tables show segment revenues from external customers (there were no intersegment revenues) and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss for each period presented. Although the three month periods are comparable, the year-to-date periods are not comparable as the results for 2015 include the results of operations for the period from the Real Alloy acquisition date to June 30, 2015, or approximately four months.
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
212.4 |
|
|
$ |
108.4 |
|
|
$ |
320.8 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
231.0 |
|
|
$ |
137.6 |
|
|
$ |
368.6 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
413.2 |
|
|
$ |
217.0 |
|
|
$ |
630.2 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
316.5 |
|
|
$ |
189.9 |
|
|
$ |
506.4 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments |
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Segment depreciation and amortization |
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Amortization of inventories and supplies purchase accounting adjustments |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Corporate and Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss—excludes share-based compensation expense |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Other |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Nonoperating expenses |
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
The following tables present summarized balance sheet information for each of our reportable segments and reconciliations to consolidated assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
June 30, 2016 |
|
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
||||
Segment Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Financing receivable |
|
— |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
Inventories |
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
Prepaid expenses, supplies, and other current assets |
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Total current assets |
|
167.0 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
199.3 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Goodwill |
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Total segment assets |
$ |
474.4 |
|
|
$ |
207.5 |
|
|
$ |
460.6 |
|
|
$ |
211.7 |
|
Segment Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables |
$ |
70.2 |
|
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
$ |
58.1 |
|
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
Accrued pension benefits |
|
— |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
Environmental liabilities |
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Total segment liabilities |
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Alloy North America |
$ |
474.4 |
|
|
$ |
460.6 |
|
Real Alloy Europe |
|
207.5 |
|
|
|
211.7 |
|
Unallocated |
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
Total consolidated assets |
$ |
704.1 |
|
|
$ |
700.9 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Alloy North America |
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
Real Alloy Europe |
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
Unallocated |
|
336.4 |
|
|
|
332.1 |
|
Total consolidated liabilities |
$ |
548.6 |
|
|
$ |
536.6 |
|
|
NOTE 12—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
NABCO
On January 9, 2015, we sold all of our interests in NABCO for $77.9 million, including a final working capital adjustment of $0.1 million, and $3.9 million of proceeds released from escrow in the first quarter of 2016. As a result of the sale, the gain on sale of NABCO, along with the assets, liabilities and results of operations of NABCO are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
SGGH
As of June 30, 2016, the largest liability within discontinued operations is a repurchase reserve that represents estimated losses from repurchase claims based on claimed breaches of certain representations and warranties provided by FIL to counterparties that purchased residential real estate loans, predominantly from 2002 through 2007. Management estimates the likely range of the loan repurchase liability based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the timing of such claims relative to the loan origination date, the quality of the documentation supporting such claims, the number and involvement of cross-defendants, if any, related to such claims, and a time and expense estimate if a claim were to result in litigation. The estimate is based on currently available information and was subject to known and unknown uncertainties using multiple assumptions requiring significant judgment.
In June 2015, the New York State Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division in ACE Securities Corp v. DB Structured Products, Inc. (the “ACE Securities Case”), whereby the New York state six-year statute of limitations on loan repurchase demands begins to run as of the closing date on which the representations were made, which, in the ACE Securities Case, was the date of the mortgage loan purchase agreements. Based on the final decision in the ACE Securities Case, management has reassessed its exposure to losses from repurchase demands and believes a repurchase reserve of $0.7 million is adequate as of June 30, 2016.
The Company did not settle or receive any repurchase claims during the six months ended June 30, 2016 or the year ended December 31, 2015. The repurchase reserve liability was $0.7 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the repurchase reserve was reduced by zero and $0.2 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the repurchase reserve was reduced by zero and $4.8 million, respectively.
Earnings from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is primarily related to $0.2 million of restitution received from the U.S. government related to an investigation of various sub-prime mortgage loan brokers. Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is primarily related to the $39.7 million pretax gain on sale of NABCO and a $4.8 million reduction in the repurchase reserve.
|
NOTE 13—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
Real Alloy’s operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations governing air emissions, wastewater discharges, the handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste, and employee health and safety. These laws and regulations can impose joint and several liabilities for releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances upon statutorily defined parties, including us, regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the original activity or disposal. Given the changing nature of environmental legal requirements, we may be required, from time to time, to take environmental control measures at some of our facilities to meet future requirements. Real Alloy is under regulatory consent orders or directives to perform environmental remediation by agencies in two states, and is working with local authorities to resume the operations of its Norwegian salt slag operations. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of the June 2016 suspension of its salt slag operations will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, overall trends in results of operations, or cash flows.
Real Alloy’s reserves for environmental remediation liabilities totaled $15.6 million and $16.0 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Of the total remediation liability as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $3.9 million and $4.3 million, respectively, are classified in accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, with the remaining portion classified as environmental liabilities.
In addition to environmental liabilities, Real Alloy has asset retirement obligations associated with legal requirements related primarily to the normal operation of its landfills and the retirement of the related assets, which represents the most probable costs of remedial actions. Real Alloy’s total asset retirement obligations were $5.1 million and $5.0 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, of which $0.8 million and $0.9 million are classified as accrued liabilities, respectively, and $4.3 million and $4.1 million as other noncurrent liabilities, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
Real Industry, Real Alloy and SGGH have been named as a defendant in or as a party to a number of legal actions or proceedings that arose in the ordinary course of business. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for monetary damages are asserted. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings, management generally cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss related to each pending matter may be, if any.
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, management establishes an accrued liability for litigation when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. The estimated loss is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment, a variety of assumptions, and known and unknown uncertainties. The matters underlying the estimated loss may change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate. Therefore, an estimate of loss represents what management believes to be an estimate of loss only for certain matters meeting these criteria. It does not represent the Company’s maximum loss exposure.
Based on management’s current understanding of these pending legal actions and proceedings, it does not believe that judgments or settlements arising from pending or threatened legal matters, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, and the very large or indeterminate damages that may be sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to the Company’s results of operations or cash flows for any particular reporting period.
See Note 23—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of the Company’s Annual Report for additional information on certain legal proceedings and other matters involving the Company.
|
Recent accounting updates
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which was the result of a joint project by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The issuance of a comprehensive and converged standard on revenue recognition is expected to enable financial statement users to better understand and consistently analyze an entity’s revenue across industries, transactions and geographies. The standard will require additional disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the nature, amount, timing, and potential uncertainty of the revenue that is recognized. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and management is evaluating the application methods available, but has yet to select from either retrospective application to each prior reporting period presented or retrospective application with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of adoption. Management continues to evaluate the impact ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and disclosure requirements. The adoption and implementation of the accounting and disclosure requirements of ASU 2014-09 is expected to have a substantial impact on financial statement disclosures.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”), which clarifies two aspects of Topic 606, identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. Before an entity can identify its performance obligations in a contract with a customer, the entity first identifies the promised goods or services in the contract. ASU 2016-10 is intended to clarify the operability and understandability of the licensing implementation guidance. ASU 2016-10 will be effective for the Company in conjunction with the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance in connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-10”), which provides clarification to Topic 606 on how to assess collectability, present sales tax, treat noncash consideration, and account for completed and modified contracts at the time of transition. In addition, ASU 2016-12 clarifies that an entity retrospectively applying the guidance in Topic 606 is not required to disclose the effect of the accounting change in the period of adoption. The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU 2014-09, which is effective January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance in connection with the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which generally requires companies to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet. This guidance will be effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) (“ASU 2016-06”), which clarifies what steps are required when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call or put options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts, which is one of the criteria for bifurcating an embedded derivative. Consequently, when an option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to exercise the option is related to interest rates or credit risks. ASU 2016-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, an option to recognize gross share-based compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications in the statement of cash flows. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
|
The following table presents the components of inventories as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Real Alloy: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods |
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
Raw materials and work in process |
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
Total Real Alloy inventories |
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
Cosmedicine - finished goods |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Total inventories |
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
|
The following table presents the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Senior Secured Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount outstanding |
$ |
305.0 |
|
|
$ |
305.0 |
|
Unamortized original issue discount and issuance costs |
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
Senior Secured Notes, net |
|
292.7 |
|
|
|
290.7 |
|
Asset-Based Facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount outstanding |
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Asset-Based Facility, net |
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Capital leases |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Total long-term debt, net |
$ |
316.7 |
|
|
$ |
312.1 |
|
The following table presents the activity related to the carrying value of Redeemable Preferred Stock during the six months ended June 30, 2016:
(In millions) |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
$ |
21.9 |
|
Dividends on Redeemable Preferred Stock, in-kind |
|
0.9 |
|
Accretion of fair value adjustment to Redeemable Preferred Stock |
|
0.5 |
|
Balance, June 30, 2016 |
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity within stockholders’ equity attributable to Real Industry and noncontrolling interest for the six months ended June 30, 2016:
(In millions) |
Equity Attributable to Real Industry, Inc. |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|||
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
$ |
141.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
142.4 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
Dividends and accretion of fair value adjustment to Redeemable Preferred Stock |
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Warrants exercised |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Balance, June 30, 2016 |
$ |
131.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
132.2 |
|
The following table reflects changes in the shares of common stock outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2016:
|
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
|
28,891,766 |
|
Restricted common stock awards granted, net of treasury shares reissued |
|
344,406 |
|
Common stock issued from the exercise of Warrants |
|
20,000 |
|
Treasury shares acquired, net of reissuance |
|
(2,750 |
) |
Balance, June 30, 2016 |
|
29,253,422 |
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2016:
(In millions) |
Currency Translation Adjustments |
|
|
Pension Benefit Adjustments |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
(6.0 |
) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
Current period currency translation adjustments |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial gains, net of tax |
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Balance, end of period |
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit expense under the German defined benefit pension plans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Service cost |
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial gains |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
The table below presents gross amounts of recognized assets and liabilities, the amounts offset in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and the net amounts of assets and liabilities presented therein. As of June 30, 2016, there were no amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that have not been offset in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
|
Fair Value of Derivatives |
|
|
Fair Value of Derivatives |
|
||||||||||
|
as of June 30, 2016 |
|
|
as of December 31, 2015 |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
||||
Metal |
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Natural gas |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Total |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Effect of counterparty netting arrangements |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Net derivatives assets (liabilities) as classified in the consolidated balance sheets |
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
The following table presents details of the fair value of Real Alloy’s derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
Prepaid expenses, supplies, and other current assets |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Natural Gas |
Prepaid expenses, supplies, and other current assets |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Natural Gas |
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total derivative assets |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Natural Gas |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
The following table presents changes in the fair value of the common stock warrant liability during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
Warrants exercised |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Change in fair value of common stock warrant liability |
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
Balance, end of period |
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
The following tables set forth financial assets and liabilities and their level in the fair value hierarchy that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|||||
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
Hierarchy |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
||
Derivative assets |
Level 2 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
Level 2 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Net derivative assets (liabilities) |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
Common stock warrant liability |
Level 3 |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
The following table presents losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Natural gas |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total realized losses |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Unrealized losses (gains): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Natural gas |
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total unrealized losses (gains) |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
The following tables present the carrying values and estimated fair values of other financial instruments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
June 30, 2016 |
|
|||||
(In millions) |
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
Financing receivable |
Level 2 |
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
Loans receivable, net (other noncurrent assets) |
Level 3 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Notes |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
292.7 |
|
|
$ |
305.0 |
|
Asset-Based Facility |
Level 2 |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock |
Level 3 |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
|||||
(In millions) |
Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
Financing receivable |
Level 2 |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
Restricted cash held in escrow (other current assets) |
Level 1 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Loans receivable, net (other noncurrent assets) |
Level 3 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Notes |
Level 1 |
|
$ |
290.7 |
|
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
Asset-Based Facility |
Level 2 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock |
Level 3 |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
Reportable segment information
The following tables show segment revenues from external customers (there were no intersegment revenues) and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss for each period presented. Although the three month periods are comparable, the year-to-date periods are not comparable as the results for 2015 include the results of operations for the period from the Real Alloy acquisition date to June 30, 2015, or approximately four months.
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
212.4 |
|
|
$ |
108.4 |
|
|
$ |
320.8 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
231.0 |
|
|
$ |
137.6 |
|
|
$ |
368.6 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
413.2 |
|
|
$ |
217.0 |
|
|
$ |
630.2 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
|
|||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Revenues |
$ |
316.5 |
|
|
$ |
189.9 |
|
|
$ |
506.4 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments |
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Segment depreciation and amortization |
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Amortization of inventories and supplies purchase accounting adjustments |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Corporate and Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss—excludes share-based compensation expense |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Other |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Nonoperating expenses |
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
The following tables present summarized balance sheet information for each of our reportable segments and reconciliations to consolidated assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
June 30, 2016 |
|
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
|
RANA |
|
|
RAEU |
|
||||
Segment Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Financing receivable |
|
— |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
Inventories |
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
Prepaid expenses, supplies, and other current assets |
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Total current assets |
|
167.0 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
199.3 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Goodwill |
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Total segment assets |
$ |
474.4 |
|
|
$ |
207.5 |
|
|
$ |
460.6 |
|
|
$ |
211.7 |
|
Segment Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables |
$ |
70.2 |
|
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
$ |
58.1 |
|
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
Accrued pension benefits |
|
— |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
Environmental liabilities |
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Total segment liabilities |
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(In millions) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Alloy North America |
$ |
474.4 |
|
|
$ |
460.6 |
|
Real Alloy Europe |
|
207.5 |
|
|
|
211.7 |
|
Unallocated |
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
Total consolidated assets |
$ |
704.1 |
|
|
$ |
700.9 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Alloy North America |
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
$ |
108.2 |
|
Real Alloy Europe |
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
Unallocated |
|
336.4 |
|
|
|
332.1 |
|
Total consolidated liabilities |
$ |
548.6 |
|
|
$ |
536.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|